Search

Background Annual mortality from neonatal sepsis is an estimated 430 000–680 000 infants globally, most of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The WHO currently recommends a narrow-spectrum β-lactam (e.g. ampicillin) and gentamicin as first-line empirical therapy. However, available epidemiological data demonstrate high rates of resistance to both agents. Alternative empirical regimens are needed. Flomoxef and amikacin are two off-patent antibiotics with potential for use in this setting. Objectives To assess the pharmacodynamics of flomoxef and amikacin in combination. Methods The pharmacodynamic interaction of flomoxef and amikacin was assessed in chequerboard assays and a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) experiment. The combination was further assessed in HFIM experiments mimicking neonatal plasma exposures of clinically relevant doses of both drugs against five Enterobacterales isolates with a range of flomoxef/amikacin MICs. Results Flomoxef and amikacin in combination were synergistic in bacterial killing in both assays and prevention of emergence of amikacin resistance in the HFIM. In the HFIM assessing neonatal-like drug exposures, the combination killed 3/5 strains to sterility, (including 2/5 that monotherapy with either drug failed to kill) and failed to kill the 2/5 strains with flomoxef MICs of 32 mg/L. Conclusions We conclude that the combination of flomoxef and amikacin is synergistic and is a potentially clinically effective regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis in LMIC settings and is therefore suitable for further assessment in a clinical trial.

Background Neonatal sepsis is a serious bacterial infection of neonates, globally killing up to 680 000 babies annually. It is frequently complicated by antimicrobial resistance, particularly in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings with widespread resistance to the WHO’s recommended empirical regimen of ampicillin and gentamicin. Objectives We assessed the utility of flomoxef and fosfomycin as a potential alternative empirical regimen for neonatal sepsis in these settings. Methods We studied the combination in a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) experiment and chequerboard assays. We further assessed the combination using clinically relevant regimens in the HFIM with six Enterobacterales strains with a range of flomoxef/fosfomycin MICs. Results Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the HFIM experimental output, along with data from chequerboard assays, indicated synergy of this regimen in terms of bacterial killing and prevention of emergence of fosfomycin resistance. Flomoxef monotherapy was sufficient to kill 3/3 strains with flomoxef MICs ≤0.5 mg/L to sterility. Three of three strains with flomoxef MICs ≥8 mg/L were not killed by fosfomycin or flomoxef monotherapy; 2/3 of these were killed with the combination of the two agents. Conclusions These data suggest that flomoxef/fosfomycin could be an efficacious and synergistic regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis in LMIC settings with prevalent antimicrobial resistance. Our HFIM results warrant further assessment of the flomoxef/fosfomycin combination in clinical trials.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exists in various metabolic states, including a nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype which may affect response to therapy. We have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate discovery of effective Mtb treatment regimens and previously found pretomanid (PMD), moxifloxacin (MXF), and bedaquiline (BDQ) to readily kill logarithmic- and acid-phase Mtb. Here, we studied multiple concentrations of each drug in flask-based, time-kill studies against NRP Mtb in single-, two- and three-drug combinations, including the active M2 metabolite of BDQ. We used nonparametric population algorithms in the Pmetrics package for R to model the data and to simulate the 95% confidence interval of bacterial population decline due to the two-drug combination regimen of PMD + MXF and compared this to observed declines with three-drug regimens. PMD + MXF at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated Mtb. Unlike other states for Mtb, we observed no sustained emergence of less susceptible isolates for any regimen. The addition of BDQ as a third drug significantly (P < 0.05) shortened time to total bacterial suppression by 3 days compared to the two-drug regimen, similar to our findings for Mtb in logarithmic or acid growth phases.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolic state affects the response to therapy. Quantifying the effect of antimicrobials in the acid and nonreplicating metabolic phases of M. tuberculosis growth will help to optimize therapy for tuberculosis. As a brute-force approach to all possible drug combinations against M. tuberculosis in all different metabolic states is impossible, we have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate the discovery. Using multiple concentrations of each drug in time-kill studies, we examined single drugs and two- and three-drug combinations of pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and bedaquiline plus its active metabolite against M. tuberculosis in its acid-phase metabolic state. We used a nonparametric modeling approach to generate full distributions of interaction terms between pretomanid and moxifloxacin for susceptible and less susceptible populations. From the model, we could predict the 95% confidence interval of the simulated total bacterial population decline due to the 2-drug combination regimen of pretomanid and moxifloxacin and compare this to observed declines with 3-drug regimens. We found that the combination of pretomanid and moxifloxacin at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated M. tuberculosis in its acid growth phase and prevented emergence of less susceptible isolates. The addition of bedaquiline as a third drug shortened time to total and less susceptible bacterial suppression by 8 days compared to the 2-drug regimen, which was significantly faster than the 2-drug kill.

BackgroundVancomycin is a first line antibiotic for many common infectious diseases and is the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in the United States hospital setting. Vancomycin is also well known to cause kidney injury; two recent prospective studies have identified that increasing vancomycin area under the concentration curve predicts vancomycin induced kidney injury (VIKI). However, outside of clinical trials, it is unclear if pre-clinical data can quantitatively describe VIKI in patients.MethodsData were simultaneously analyzed from a pre-clinical rat model and two prospective clinical studies. Logged vancomycin area under the concentration curve (AUC) data for rats (n=48) and patients from PROVIDE (n=263) and CAMERA2 (n=291) were included. VIKI was defined as urinary KIM-1 concentrations ≥9.42 ng/mL in the rat and according to KDIGO stage 1 kidney injury for all human patients. Multiple generalized linear models were explored, and the order of magnitude was calculated between the probability of acute kidney injury (AKI) from the average obtained in the clinical studies (i.e. CAMERA2 and PROVIDE) and the rat for 0.1 increments in Log10AUC bounded common concentrations obtained in the therapeutic range (i.e. ~200 −800 mg*24h/L).ResultsA logit link model best fit the data. When calculating the multiplicative factors between the studies therapeutic range AUCs, the rat was an average 2.7 to 4.2 times more sensitive to AKI between AUCs of 199.5 (i.e. log 10 AUC=2.3) and 794.3 mg*h/L (i.e. log 10 AUC=2.9), respectively.ConclusionsA pre-clinical rat model was quantitatively linked to toxicity data from two large human studies. The rat is an attractive pre-clinical model to explore exposure toxicity relationships with vancomycin. External validation is required.

Isavuconazole, administered as the water-soluble prodrug isavuconazonium sulfate, is a new triazole agent used to treat invasive fungal infections. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of isavuconazole in 46 immunocompromised pediatric patients, stratified by age (1 to 80% and >76% of simulated pediatric patients following i.v. or oral administration, respectively. Intravenous and oral administration of isavuconazonium sulfate at the studied dosage of 10 mg/kg was well tolerated and resulted in exposure in pediatric patients similar to that in adults. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03241550).

Antimicrobial resistance (particularly through extended-spectrum β-lactamase and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme production) in neonatal sepsis is a global problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, with significant mortality rates. High rates of resistance are reported for the current WHO-recommended first-line antibiotic regimen for neonatal sepsis, i.e., ampicillin and gentamicin. We assessed the utility of fosfomycin and amikacin as a potential alternative regimen to be used in settings of increasingly prevalent antimicrobial resistance. The combination was studied in a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) experiment. The combination of amikacin and fosfomycin enhanced bactericidal activity and prevented the emergence of resistance, compared to monotherapy with either antibiotic. Modeling of the experimental quantitative outputs and data from checkerboard assays indicated synergy. We further assessed the combination regimen at clinically relevant doses in the HFIM with nine Enterobacterales strains with high fosfomycin and amikacin MICs and demonstrated successful kill to sterilization for 6/9 strains. From these data, we propose a novel combination breakpoint threshold for microbiological success for this antimicrobial combination against Enterobacterales strains, i.e., MIC(F) × MIC(A) < 256 (where MIC(F) and MIC(A) are the fosfomycin and amikacin MICs, respectively). Monte Carlo simulations predict that a standard fosfomycin-amikacin neonatal regimen would achieve >99% probability of pharmacodynamic success for strains with MICs below this threshold. We conclude that the combination of fosfomycin with amikacin is a viable regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis and is suitable for further clinical assessment in a randomized controlled trial.

In recent years, clofazimine (CFZ) has been regaining prominence for the treatment of tuberculosis. However, it shows limited efficacy as a single drug and optimal combination partners have not been identified. Therefore, the objective of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of CFZ-containing two-drug regimens with pretomanid (PMD), bedaquiline (BDQ) or linezolid (LZD) by: (i) determining their pharmacodynamic (PD) mode of interaction against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strain H37Rv in log- phase and acid-phase metabolic states, and against Mtb strain 18b in a non-replicating persister (NRP) metabolic state; (ii) predicting bacterial cell kill of the drugs alone and in combination; and (iii) evaluating the relationship between the interaction mode and the extent of bacterial cell kill. The results of our Greco universal response surface analysis showed that CFZ was at least additive with a clear trend towards synergy when combined with PMD, BDQ and LZD against Mtb in all explored metabolic states under in vitro checkerboard assay conditions. The results further showed that all two-drug combination regimens exerted greater bacterial kill than any of the drugs alone. CFZ alone showed the least antimicrobial efficacy amongst the evaluated drugs, and there was a lack of correlation between the mode of interaction and the extent of bacterial kill. However, we may underestimate the effect of CFZ in this screening approach owing to limited in vitro study duration and neglect of target site accumulation. Clofazimine; Pretomanid; Bedaquiline; Linezolid; Combination chemotherapy; Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The high interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of linezolid has been described, which results in an unacceptably high proportion of patients with either suboptimal or potentially toxic concentrations following the administration of a fixed regimen. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of linezolid and use this to build and validate alogorithms for individualized dosing. A retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using data from 338 hospitalized patients (65.4% male, 65.5 [±14.6] years) who underwent routine therapeutic drug monitoring for linezolid. Linezolid concentrations were analyzed by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using a nonparametric methodology with Pmetrics, and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to calculate the 100% time >MIC after the administration of a fixed regimen of 600 mg administered every 12 h (q12h) intravenously (i.v.). The dose of linezolid needed to achieve a PTA ≥ 90% for all susceptible isolates classified according to EUCAST was estimated to be as high as 2,400 mg q12h, which is 4 times higher than the maximum licensed linezolid dose. The final PK model was then used to construct software for dosage individualization, and the performance of the software was assessed using 10 new patients not used to construct the original population PK model. A three-compartment model with an absorptive compartment with zero-order i.v. input and first-order clearance from the central compartment best described the data. The dose optimization software tracked patients with a high degree of accuracy. The software may be a clinically useful tool to adjust linezolid dosages in real time to achieve prespecified drug exposure targets. A further prospective study is needed to examine the potential clinical utility of individualized therapy.

The need for precision dosing has been challenged on the basis of insufficient evidence. Herein, we argue that adequate evidence exists to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and precisely target antibiotic exposures. While achievement of any antibiotic concentration does not guarantee efficacy sans toxicity for any single patient, stochastic control optimizes the probability of achieving favourable responses across patients. We argue that variability in targets (such as the organism’s MIC) can be considered with models. That is, complexity alone does not relegate the decision-making framework to ‘clinician intuition’. We acknowledge the exposure–response relationships are modified by patient-specific factors (other drugs, baseline organ functional status etc.) and describe how precision dosing can inform clinical decision making rather than protocolize it. Finally, we call for randomized, controlled trials; however, we suggest that these trials are not necessary to make TDM standard of care for multiple classes of antibiotics.

Gentamicin is known to have concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, and its nephrotoxic effect is well described. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to optimize gentamicin dosing in pediatrics. Data were retrospectively collected for pediatric patients 1 month to 12 years of age, admitted to general pediatric wards or intensive care units and received gentamicin for suspected or proven Gram-negative infections at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 306 gentamicin peak and trough concentrations sets from 107 patients were analyzed with mean (±standard deviation) patient age and weight of 4.5 ± 3.5 years and 16.7 ± 10.8 kg, respectively. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were adequately described with a one compartment system (R = 0.82, bias = 1.75% and precision = 88% for population predictions and R = 0.94, bias = 5% and precision = 29% for individual predictions). The gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: volume of distribution = 8.9 L, total body clearance = 2.8 L/h for a 20-kg patient. Monte Carlo simulations showed that doses of 5-6 mg/kg/dose once daily are adequate only to treat infections with Gram-negative organisms having minimal inhibitory concentration less than 1 µg/mL. While, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 1 µg/mL, higher doses (7-8 mg/kg/dose once daily) are needed to maximize the efficacy of gentamicin. However, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL, even a 10 mg/kg dose showed poor target attainment (52%). The finding of this study highlights the need to reevaluate the current breakpoints of gentamicin and also to assess the safety of higher doses of gentamicin in pediatrics.

The repurposed agent moxifloxacin has become an important addition to the physician’s armamentarium for the therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. When a drug is administered, we need to have metrics for success. As for most antimicrobial chemotherapy, we contend that for Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy, these metrics should be a decline in the susceptible bacterial burden and the suppression of amplification of less-susceptible populations. To achieve optimal outcomes relative to these metrics, a dose and schedule of administration need to be chosen. For large populations of patients, there are true between-patient differences in important pharmacokinetic parameters. These distributions of parameter values may have an impact on these metrics, depending on what measure of drug exposure drives the metrics. To optimize dose and schedule choice of moxifloxacin, we performed a dose fractionation experiment in the hollow fiber infection model. We examined 12-, 24-, and 48-h dosing intervals with doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg for each interval, respectively. Within each interval, we had an arm where half-lives of 12, 8, and 4 h were simulated. We attempted to keep the average concentration (C(avg)) or area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) constant across arms. We found that susceptible bacterial load decline was linked to C(avg), as we had indicated previously. Resistance suppression, a nonmonotonic function, had minimum concentration (C(min)) as the linked index. The 48-h interval with the 4-h half-life had the largest less-susceptible population. Balancing bacterial kill, resistance suppression, toxicity (linked to peak concentration [C(peak)]), and adherence, we conclude that the dose of 400 mg daily is optimal for moxifloxacin.

Vancomycin induces exposure-related acute kidney injury. However, the pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic (PK-TD) relationship remains unclear. Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (i.v.) vancomycin doses of 300 mg/kg/day and 400 mg/kg/day, divided into once-, twice-, three-times-, or four-times-daily doses (i.e., QD, BID, TID, or QID) over 24 h. Up to 8 samples plus a terminal sample were drawn during the 24-h dosing period. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1). Vancomycin was quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Following terminal sampling, nephrectomy and histopathologic analyses were conducted. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics. PK exposures (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24] and maximum concentration from 0 to 24 h [Cmax0-24]) were calculated for each rat, and PK-TD relationships were discerned. A total of 53-rats generated PK-TD data. A 2-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian observed versus predicted concentrations; R2 = 0.96). KIM-1 values were greater in QD and BID groups (P for QD versus TID

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug discovery effort has generated a substantial number of new/repurposed drugs for therapy for this pathogen. The arrival of these drugs is welcome, but another layer of difficulty has emerged. Single agent therapy is insufficient for patients with late-stage tuberculosis because of resistance emergence. To achieve our therapeutic ends, it is requisite to identify optimal combination regimens. These regimens go through a lengthy and expensive evaluative process. If we have a modest group of 6 to 8 new or repurposed agents, this translates into 15 to 28 possible 2-drug combinations. There is neither time nor resources to give an extensive evaluation for all combinations. We sought a screening procedure that would identify combinations that had a high likelihood of achieving good bacterial burden decline. We examined pretomanid, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and bedaquiline in log-phase growth, acid-phase growth, and nonreplicative persister (NRP) phase in the Greco interaction model. We employed the interaction term α and the calculated bacterial burden decline as metrics to rank different regimens in different metabolic states. No relationship was found between α and bacterial kill. We chose bacterial kill as the prime metric. The combination of pretomanid plus moxifloxacin emerged as the clear frontrunner, as the largest bacterial declines were seen in log phase and acid phase with this regimen and it was second best in NRP phase. Bedaquiline also produced good kill. This screening process may identify optimal combinations that can be further evaluated in both the hollow-fiber infection model and in animal models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Preclinical animal models of infection are employed to develop new agents but also to screen among molecules to rank them. There are often major differences between human pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and those developed by animal models of infection, and these may lead to substantial differences in efficacy relative to that seen in humans. Linezolid is a repurposed agent employed to great effect for therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this study, we used the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) to evaluate the impact of different pharmacokinetic profiles of mice and nonhuman primates (NHP) versus humans on bacterial cell kill as well as resistance suppression. We examined both plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) profiles. We examined simulated exposures equivalent to 600 mg and 900 mg daily of linezolid in humans. For both plasma and ELF exposures, the murine PK profile provided estimates of effect that were biased low relative to human and NHP PK profiles. Mathematical modeling identified a linkage between minimum concentrations (C(min)) and bacterial kill and peak concentrations (C(peak)) and resistance suppression, with the latter being supported by a prospective validation study. Finding new agents with novel mechanisms of action against M. tuberculosis is difficult. It would be a tragedy to discard a new agent because of a biased estimate of effect in a preclinical animal system. The HFIM provides a system to benchmark evaluation of new compounds in preclinical animal model systems against human PK effects (species scale-up estimates of PK), to safeguard against unwarranted rejection of promising new agents.

The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to determine a dosing regimen for caspofungin in critically ill patients. Nine blood samples were drawn per dosing occasion. Fifteen patients with (suspected) invasive candidiasis had one dosing occasion and five had two dosing occasions, measured on day 3 (±1) of treatment. Pmetrics was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA). A target 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value of 98 mg·h/liter was used as an efficacy parameter., The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to determine a dosing regimen for caspofungin in critically ill patients. Nine blood samples were drawn per dosing occasion. Fifteen patients with (suspected) invasive candidiasis had one dosing occasion and five had two dosing occasions, measured on day 3 (±1) of treatment. Pmetrics was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA). A target 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value of 98 mg·h/liter was used as an efficacy parameter. Secondarily, the AUC/MIC targets of 450, 865, and 1,185 were used to calculate PTAs for Candida glabrata, C. albicans, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The final 2-compartment model included weight as a covariate on volume of distribution (V). The mean V of the central compartment was 7.71 (standard deviation [SD], 2.70) liters/kg of body weight, the mean elimination constant (Ke) was 0.09 (SD, 0.04) h−1, the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the central to the peripheral compartment was 0.44 (SD, 0.39) h−1, and the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the peripheral to the central compartment was 0.46 (SD, 0.35) h−1. A loading dose of 2 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 1.25 mg/kg as a maintenance dose, was chosen. With this dose, 98% of the patients were expected to reach the AUC target on the first day and 100% of the patients on the third day. The registered caspofungin dose might not be suitable for critically ill patients who were all overweight (≥120 kg), over 80% of median weight (78 kg), and around 25% of lower weight (≤50 kg). A weight-based dose regimen might be appropriate for achieving adequate exposure of caspofungin in intensive care unit patients.

Given that aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, may be used for multi-drug resistant infections, optimization of therapy is paramount for improved treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate the pharmacodynamics of different simulated intravenous amikacin doses on susceptible to inform ventilator-associated pneumonia and sepsis treatment choices.A hollow-fibre infection model with two isolates (MIC 2 and 8 mg/L) with an initial inoculum ∼10 colony-forming unit/mL was used to test different amikacin dosing regimens. Three regimens (15, 25 and 50 mg/kg) simulating a blood exposure and a 30 mg/kg regimen simulating the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for potential respiratory tract infection were tested. Data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Whole genome sequencing was used to identify mutations associated with resistance emergence.While bacterial density was reduced by >6-logs within the first 12 h in simulated blood exposures, following this initial bacterial kill, there was amplification of a resistant sub-population with ribosomal mutations that were likely mediating amikacin resistance. No appreciable bacterial killing occurred with subsequent doses. There was less (

Cefepime is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat bacterial infections. The time during which the free cefepime concentration is above the MIC (fT(>MIC)) should be optimized to increase the efficacy of the regimen. We aim to optimize the exposure of cefepime in ICU patients by using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. Two data sets were included in this study. The first was a prospective study of pediatric patients who received cefepime at 50 mg/kg of body weight and had extensive PK sampling. The second study comprised retrospective data for adult ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital who received cefepime and had their cefepime concentrations measured. The population PK model was developed, and simulations were performed, using Pmetrics. The target exposures were 100% fT(>MIC) and 100% fT(>4×MIC). The studies included a total of 266 patients, and the mean ages were 3.9 years in the pediatric group and 55 years in adult group. More than half of the patients were males. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 125 (93) ml/min. The mean (SD) daily dose for adults was 4.9 (1.6) g. Cefepime was well described by a two-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution and elimination rate constant (k(el)), and CrCl and age group as covariates on k(el). At a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a cefepime loading dose of 4 g as an extended infusion followed by a 6-g continuous infusion was needed for good target attainment. In conclusion, prolonged or continuous infusions will be needed to achieve optimal cefepime exposure for ICU patients. Given the observed variability, therapeutic drug monitoring can help individualize therapy.

Objectives Area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) -guided dosing provides better estimates of exposure than vancomycin trough concentrations. Though clinical benefits have been reported, the costs of AUC-guided dosing are uncertain. The objective of this study was to quantify the costs of single-sample Bayesian or two-sample AUC strategies versus trough-guided dosing. Methods A cost–benefit analysis from the institutional perspective was conducted using a decision tree to model the probabilities and costs of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with vancomycin administered over 48 hours up to 21+ days. Costs included vancomycin concentrations, Bayesian software and AKI hospitalization costs, and probabilities were obtained from primary literature. Robustness was assessed via both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results In the base-case model, two-sample AUC versus trough dosing saved an average of US$ 846 per patient encounter, and single-sample Bayesian AUC versus trough dosing saved an average of US$ 2065 per patient encounter. This translates into annual cost-savings of US$ 846 810 and US$ 2 065 720 for two-sample and single-sample Bayesian methods versus trough dosing, respectively, assuming 1000 vancomycin-treated patients per year. Assuming a budget of US$ 100 000 per year for Bayesian software, an institution would need to treat ≥41 patients with vancomycin for at least 48 hours to break even. Conclusions There are significant institutional cost benefits using two-sample AUC or single-sample Bayesian methods over trough dosing, even after accounting for the annual costs of Bayesian programs. The potential to decrease rates of AKI, improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs to the institution strongly warrants consideration of improved dosing methods for vancomycin.

Multidrug therapy is often required. Examples include antiviral therapy, nosocomial infections, and, most commonly, anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy. Our laboratory previously identified a mathematical approach to identify 2-drug regimens with a synergistic or additive interaction using a full factorial study design. Our objective here was to generate a method to identify an optimal 3-drug therapy. We studied M. tuberculosis isolate H37Rv in log-phase growth in flasks. Pretomanid and moxifloxacin were chosen as the base 2-drug regimen. Bedaquiline (plus M2 metabolite) was chosen as the third drug for evaluation. Total bacterial burden and bacterial burden less-susceptible to study drugs were enumerated. A large mathematical model was fit to all the data. This allowed extension to evaluation of the 3-drug regimen by employing a Monte Carlo simulation. Pretomanid plus moxifloxacin demonstrated excellent bacterial kill and suppressed amplification of less-susceptible pathogens. Total bacterial burden was driven to extinction in 3 weeks in 6 of 9 combination therapy evaluations. Only the lowest pretomanid/moxifloxacin exposures in combination did not extinguish the bacterial burden. No combination regimen allowed resistance amplification. Generation of 95% credible intervals about estimates of the interaction parameters α (α(s), α(r-p), and α(r-m)) by bootstrapping showed the interaction was near synergistic. The addition of bedaquiline/M2 metabolite was evaluated by forming a 95% confidence interval regarding the decline in bacterial burden. The addition of bedaquiline/M2 metabolite shortened the time to eradication by 1 week and was significantly different. A model-based system approach to evaluating combinations of 3 agents shows promise to rapidly identify the most promising combinations that can then be trialed.

OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to 1) define extent and potential clinical impact of increased or decreased renal elimination of meropenem in children with sepsis, based on analysis of renal function during the first 2 days of PICU stay; and 2) estimate the risk of subtherapeutic meropenem exposure attributable to increased renal clearance. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated patients with a diagnosis of sepsis, receiving meropenem from the PICU at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego from 2015–2017. Meropenem exposure was estimated by using FDA-approved doses (20 and 40 mg/kg/dose) on day 1 and day 2 of PICU stay, based on a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. For this population with sepsis, we assessed time-above-minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) for pathogen MICs. RESULTS Meropenem treatment was documented in 105 episodes of sepsis with a 48% rate of pathogen detection. By day 2, increased eGFR (>120 mL/min/1.73 m2) was documented in 49% of patients, with 17% meeting criteria for augmented renal clearance ([ARC] >160 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 10%, for decreased function. Simulations documented that 80% of PICU patients with ARC did not achieve therapeutic meropenem exposure for Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a MIC of 2, using standard doses to achieve a pharmacodynamic goal of 80% T>MIC. CONCLUSIONS Approximately 3 of every 20 children with sepsis exhibited ARC during the first 48 hours of PICU stay. Simulations documented an increased risk for subtherapeutic meropenem exposure, suggesting that higher meropenem doses may be required to achieve adequate antibiotic exposure early in the PICU course.

Monte Carlo simulations allow prediction and comparison of concentration-time profiles arising from different dosing regimens in a defined population, provided a population pharmacokinetic model has been established. The aims of this study were to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of imipenem in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) using EUCAST data. A two-compartment model based on a data set of 19 subjects was employed. Various dosage regimens at 0.5-h and 3-h infusion rates and as continuous infusion were evaluated against the pharmacodynamic targets of 20%fT>MIC, 40%fT>MIC and 100%fT>MIC. For the target of 40%fT>MIC, all 0.5-h infusion regimens achieved optimal exposures (CFR ≥ 90%) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, with nearly optimal exposure against Klebsiella pneumoniae (CFR ≥ 89.4%). The 3-h infusions and continuous infusion exceeded 97% CFR against all pathogens with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., where the maximum CFRs were 85.5% and 88.4%, respectively. For the 100%fT>MIC target, only continuous infusion was associated with nearly optimal exposures. Higher PTAs for the targets of 40%fT>MIC and 100%fT>MIC were achieved with 3-h infusions and continuous infusion in comparison with 0.5-h infusions; however, continuous infusion carries a risk of not reaching the MIC of less susceptible pathogens in a higher proportion of patients. In critically ill patients with HAP with risk factors for Gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria, maximum doses administered as extended infusions may be necessary.

Vancomycin has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic relationship for AKI is not well defined. Allometrically scaled vancomycin exposures were used to assess the relationship between vancomycin exposure and AKI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received clinical-grade vancomycin in normal saline (NS) as intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections for 24- to 72-h durations with doses ranging 0 to 200 mg/kg of body weight divided once or twice daily. Urine was collected over the protocol's final 24 h. Renal histopathology was qualitatively scored. Urinary biomarkers (e.g., cystatin C, clusterin, kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1], osteopontin, lipocalin 2/neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin 2) were assayed using a Luminex xMAP system. Plasma vancomycin concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. A three-compartment vancomycin pharmacokinetic model was fit to the data with the Pmetrics package for R. The exposure-response in the first 24 h was evaluated using Spearman's nonparametric correlation coefficient ( r s ) values for the area under the concentration-time curve during the first 24 h (AUC 0–24 ), the maximum concentration in plasma during the first 24 h (C max 0–24 ), and the lowest (minimum) concentration in plasma after the dose closest to 24 h (C min 0–24 ). A total of 52 rats received vancomycin ( n = 42) or NS ( n = 10). The strongest exposure-response correlations were observed between AUC 0–24 and C max 0–24 and urinary AKI biomarkers. Exposure-response correlations ( r s values) for AUC 0–24 , C max 0–24 , and C min 0–24 were 0.37, 0.39, and 0.22, respectively, for clusterin; 0.42, 0.45, and 0.26, respectively, for KIM-1; and 0.52, 0.55, and 0.42, respectively, for osteopontin. However, no differences in histopathological scores were observed. Optimal sampling times after administration of the i.p. dose were 0.25, 0.75, 2.75, and 8 h for the once-daily dosing schemes and 0.25, 1.25, 14.5, and 17.25 h for the twice-daily dosing schemes. Our observations suggest that AUC 0–24 or C max 0–24 correlates with increases in urinary AKI biomarkers.

Background Cefepime (CEF) is commonly used for adult and pediatric infections. Several studies have examined CEF’s pharmacokinetics (PK) in various populations; however, a unifying PK model for adult and pediatric subjects does not yet exist. We developed a combined population model for adult and pediatric patients and validated the model. Methods The initial model includes adult and pediatric patients with a rich cefepime sampling design. All adults received 2 g CEF while pediatric subjects received a mean of 49 (SD 5) mg/kg. One- and two-compartment models were considered as base models and were fit using a non-parametric adaptive grid algorithm within the Pmetrics package 1.5.2 (Los Angeles, CA) for R 3.5.1. Compartmental model selection was based on Akaike information criteria (AIC). Covariate relationships with PK parameters were visually inspected and mathematically assessed. Predictive performance was evaluated using bias and imprecision of the population and individual prediction models. External validation was conducted using a separate adult cohort. Results A total of 45 subjects (n = 9 adults; n = 36 pediatrics) were included in the initial PK model build and 12 subjects in the external validation cohort. Overall, the data were best described using a two-compartment model with volume of distribution (V) normalized to total body weight (TBW/70 kg) and an allometric scaled elimination rate constant (Ke) for pediatric subjects (AIC = 4,138.36). Final model observed vs. predicted plots demonstrated good fit (population R2 = 0.87, individual R2 = 0.97, Figure 1a and b). For the final model, the population median parameter values (95% credibility interval) were V0 (total volume of distribution), 11.7 L (10.2–14.6); Ke for adult, 0.66 hour−1 (0.38–0.78), Ke for pediatrics, 0.82 hour−1 (0.64–0.85), KCP (rate constant from central to peripheral compartment), 1.4 hour−1 (1.3–1.8), KPC (rate constant from peripheral to central compartment), 1.6 hour−1 (1.2–1.8). The validation cohort has 12 subjects, and the final model fit the data well (individual R2 = 0.75). Conclusion In this diverse group of adult and pediatrics, a two-compartment model described CEF PK well and was externally validated with a unique cohort. This model can serve as a population prior for real-time PK software algorithms. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

ObjectivesResistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae to all gonorrhoea therapeutic antimicrobials has emerged. Novel therapeutic antimicrobials are imperative and the first-in-class spiropyrimidinetrione zoliflodacin appears promising. Zoliflodacin could be introduced in dual antimicrobial therapies to prevent the emergence and/or spread of resistance. We investigated the in vitro activity of and selection of resistance to zoliflodacin alone and in combination with six gonorrhoea therapeutic antimicrobials against N. gonorrhoeae.MethodsThe international gonococcal reference strains WHO F (WT) and WHO O, WHO V and WHO X (strains with different AMR profiles) were examined. Zoliflodacin was evaluated alone or combined with ceftriaxone, cefixime, spectinomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, cethromycin or sitafloxacin in chequerboard assays, time–kill curve analysis and selection-of-resistance studies.ResultsZoliflodacin alone or in combination with all six antimicrobials showed rapid growth inhibition against all examined strains. The time–kill curve analysis indicated that tetracycline or cethromycin combined with zoliflodacin can significantly decrease the zoliflodacin kill rate in vitro. The frequency of selected zoliflodacin-resistance mutations was low when evaluated as a single agent and further reduced for all antimicrobial combinations. All resistant mutants contained the GyrB mutations D429N, K450T or K450N, resulting in zoliflodacin MICs of 0.5–4 mg/L.ConclusionsZoliflodacin, alone or in combination with sexually transmitted infection therapeutic antimicrobials, rapidly kills gonococci with infrequent resistance emergence. Zoliflodacin remains promising for gonorrhoea oral monotherapy and as part of dual antimicrobial therapy with low resistance emergence potential. A Phase III trial evaluating efficacy and safety of zoliflodacin for uncomplicated gonorrhoea treatment is planned in 2019.

Voriconazole is a first-line antifungal agent. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a standard of care., Voriconazole is a first-line antifungal agent. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a standard of care. The best way to adjust dosages to achieve desired drug exposure endpoints is unclear due to nonlinear and variable pharmacokinetics. Previously described software was used to prospectively adjust voriconazole dosages. The CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genotypes were determined. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a Cmin at 120 h in the range 1 to 3 mg/liter using software to adjust voriconazole dosages. A total of 19 patients were enrolled, and 14 were evaluable. Of these, 12/14 (85.7%; 95% confidence interval = 57.2 to 98.2%) had a Cmin at 120 h posttreatment initiation of 1 to 3 mg/liter, which was higher than the a priori expected proportion of 33%. There was no association of CYP genotype-derived metabolizer phenotype with voriconazole AUC. Software can be used to adjust the dosages of voriconazole to achieve drug exposures that are safe and effective. (The clinical trial discussed in this paper has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database under EudraCT no. 2013-0025878-34 and in the ISRCTN registry under no. ISRCTN83902726.)

A major goal for improving tuberculosis therapy is to identify drug regimens with improved efficacy and shorter treatment durations. Shorter therapies improve patient adherence to the antibiotic regimens that, in turn, decreases resistance emergence. M. tuberculosis exists in multiple metabolic states. At the initiation of therapy, the bulk of the population is in Log-Phase growth. Consequently, it is logical to focus initial therapy on these organisms. Moxifloxacin has good early bactericidal activity against Log-Phase growth bacteria and is a logical component of initial therapy. It would be optimal if this agent also possessed activity against Acid-Phase and Non-Replicative Persister (NRP) Phenotype organisms. We studied multiple exposures to moxifloxacin (equivalent to 200 mg-800 mg daily) in our Hollow Fiber Infection Model against strain H37Rv in Acid-Phase and against strain 18b in streptomycin starvation, which is a model for NRP-Phase organisms. Moxifloxacin possesses good activity against Acid-Phase organisms, generating from 3.75 Log 10 (CFU/ml) cell kill (200 mg daily) to 5.16 Log 10 (CFU/ml) cell kill (800 mg daily) over the 28 days of the experiment. Moxifloxacin also has activity against the streptomycin-starved strain 18b. The 400 to 800 mg daily regimens achieved extinction at day 28, while the no-treatment control still had 1.96 Log 10 (CFU/ml) culturable. The lowest dose (200 mg daily) still had 0.7 Log 10 (CFU/ml) measurable at day 28, a net kill of 1.26 Log 10 (CFU/ml). Moxifloxacin is an attractive agent for early therapy, as it possesses activity against three metabolic states of M. tuberculosis .

Voriconazole is the agent of choice for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in children at least 2 years of age. The galactomannan index is a routinely used diagnostic marker for invasive aspergillosis and can be useful for following the clinical response to antifungal treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) mathematical model that links the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole with the galactomannan readout in children. Twelve children receiving voriconazole for treatment of proven, probable, and possible invasive fungal infections were studied. A previously published population PK model was used as the Bayesian prior. The PK-PD model was used to estimate the average area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in each patient and the resultant galactomannan-time profile. The relationship between the ratio of the AUC to the concentration of voriconazole that induced half maximal killing (AUC/EC 50 ) and the terminal galactomannan level was determined. The voriconazole concentration-time and galactomannan-time profiles were both highly variable. Despite this variability, the fit of the PK-PD model was good, enabling both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to be described in individual children. (AUC/EC 50 )/15.4 predicted terminal galactomannan ( P = 0.003), and a ratio of >6 suggested a lower terminal galactomannan level ( P = 0.07). The construction of linked PK-PD models is the first step in developing control software that enables not only individualized voriconazole dosages but also individualized concentration targets to achieve suppression of galactomannan levels in a timely and optimally precise manner. Controlling galactomannan levels is a first critical step to maximizing clinical response and survival.

OBJECTIVES Ganciclovir is the most widely used treatment for cytomegalovirus infections. However, neutropenia is a frequent associated adverse effect leading to a decrease in the ganciclovir dose or discontinuation of the therapy, thereby favouring viral resistance. In the present study, the objectives were: (i) to describe the pharmacokinetics of blood and intracellular ganciclovir and its metabolites; and (ii) to explore the relationship between exposure to ganciclovir and/or its metabolites and evolution of the neutrophil count under treatment. METHODS Pharmacokinetic profiles (pre-dose and 1, 2, 3 and 5 h after dosing) of ganciclovir and its metabolites were measured in 22 adult renal transplant patients and further modelled by a non-parametric approach (PMetrics(®)). The relationship between exposure indices to ganciclovir and the slope of the neutrophil count was investigated using multiple linear regression. RESULTS A four-compartment open model was able to accurately describe ganciclovir and its intracellular forms. A significant association was found between intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate concentrations (AUC0-5) and the decrease in neutrophil count over the first 3 months of treatment (β= -0.0019 ± 5 × 10(-4); P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this population of renal transplant patients, the decrease in neutrophil count, used as a surrogate marker of haematological toxicity, was associated with ganciclovir triphosphate accumulation in blood cells. Further studies are needed to test this biomarker as a predictive factor for toxicity.

Treating high-density bacterial infections is a challenging clinical problem. We have a paucity of new agents that can address this problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a particularly difficult pathogen to treat effectively because of the plethora of resistance mechanisms it carries. Fosfomycin is an agent discovered circa 40 years ago. Recently, it has been resurrected in the United States and studied for intravenous therapy. We hypothesized that, to maximize its utility, it would require combination chemotherapy when used in a clinical circumstance in high-bacterial-burden infections. We chose to examine the combination of meropenem plus fosfomycin. These agents were studied in the hollow-fiber infection model. We utilized a fully factorial study design, looking at 2 doses of meropenem alone (1 and 2 g 8-hourly) and two doses of fosfomycin alone (6 and 8 g 8-hourly), as well as all possible combinations plus a no-treatment control. We used a high-dimensional model of 5 inhomogeneous differential equations with 5 system outputs to analyze all data simultaneously. Combination therapy outperformed all monotherapy regimens, with all combinations driving >6 log(10) CFU/ml of bacterial killing. Combination therapy was able to counterselect resistance emergence (meropenem mutants being killed by the combination, as well as fosfomycin mutants being killed by the combination) in all regimens studied. The analysis demonstrated that the combination was significantly synergistic for bacterial cell killing and resistance suppression. Meropenem plus fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of high-burden Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and requires further study.

Background Isavuconazole (ISZ), dosed as the pre-drug isavuconazonium (ISM), is active against a wide variety of clinically important fungal pathogens. ISM is approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults ≥18 years of age. We present our experience with ISM to treat proven or to prevent fungal infection in pediatric patients. Methods In a retrospective review of patients who received ISM at our institution between April 2016 and April 2019, we abstracted demographic information, primary diagnosis, indication for ISM therapy, ISZ serum concentrations if available, and outcomes. Results Of 16 patients who received ISM, 12 were < 18 years of age (range 6–17 years). Underlying conditions included leukemia (n = 8), lymphoma (n = 1), post BMT (n = 1), diabetes (n = 1), and cardiac transplant (n = 1). Nine (75%) had proven invasive fungal infection with aspergillosis (n = 2), zygomycosis (n = 3), mixed aspergillosis and zygomycosis (n = 2), mixed Rhizopus and Scedosporium (n = 1), and pathology only (n = 1). Five of these 9 patients received combination ISM and liposomal amphotericin initially, followed by monotherapy with ISM in 4 patients after a mean of 26 days (range 6–63), and continued dual therapy in the fifth. The other 4 received liposomal amphotericin with or without other azoles prior to changing to ISM monotherapy. ISM dosing was 10 mg/kg q8h on days 1 and 2, followed by q24 thereafter, up to a maximum of 372 mg/dose. There were 19 measured ISZ serum concentrations obtained from 8 patients after >1 week of verified inpatient dosing, ranging from 1.0 to 7.5 mg/L, above the MIC in all cases when known. Five (42%) patients died of underlying non-mycological causes, 1 (8%) died of progressive scedosporiosis, and 6 (50%) improved. The two patients receiving ISM prophylaxis did not suffer a breakthrough fungal infection. ISM was well tolerated with no dose-limiting, drug-related toxicities noted. Conclusion ISM is a well-tolerated therapeutic option in pediatric patients at risk for or with invasive mycosis. Only 1 of our 12 patients died from progressive fungal disease. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The therapy for treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections is long and arduous. It has been hypothesized that the therapy duration is driven primarily by populations of organisms in different metabolic states that replicate slowly or not at all (acid-phase and nonreplicative-persister [NRP]-phase organisms). Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial with substantial activity against Log-phase M. tuberculosis . Here, we examined organisms in acid-phase growth and nonreplicative-persister-phenotype growth and determined the effect of differing clinically relevant exposures to linezolid in a hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). The endpoints measured were bacterial kill over 29 days and whether organisms that were less susceptible to linezolid could be recovered during that period. In addition, we evaluated the effect of administration schedule on linezolid activity, contrasting daily administration with administration of twice the daily dose every other day. Linezolid demonstrated robust activity when administered daily against both acid-phase and NRP-phase organisms. We demonstrated a clear dose response, with 900 mg of linezolid daily generating ≥3 Log(CFU/ml) killing of acid-phase and NRP-phase M. tuberculosis over 29 days. Amplification of a population less susceptible to linezolid was not seen. Activity was reduced with every 48-h dosing, indicating that the minimum concentration ( C min )/MIC ratio drove the microbiological effect. We conclude that once-daily linezolid dosing has substantial activity against M. tuberculosis in acid-phase and NRP-phase metabolic states. Other studies have shown activity against Log-phase M. tuberculosis . Linezolid is a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for M. tuberculosis and has the potential for substantially shortening therapy duration.

We hypothesized that dosing vancomycin to achieve trough concentrations of >15 mg/liter overdoses many adults compared to area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. We conducted a 3-year, prospective study of vancomycin dosing, plasma concentrations, and outcomes. In year 1, nonstudy clinicians targeted trough concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/liter (infection dependent) and controlled dosing. In years 2 and 3, the study team controlled vancomycin dosing with BestDose Bayesian software to achieve a daily, steady-state AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400, with a maximum AUC value of 800 mg · h/liter, regardless of trough concentration. For Bayesian estimation of AUCs, we used trough samples in years 1 and 2 and optimally timed samples in year 3. We enrolled 252 adults who were ≥18 years old with ≥1 available vancomycin concentration. Only 19% of all trough concentrations were therapeutic versus 70% of AUCs ( P < 0.0001). After enrollment, median trough concentrations by year were 14.4, 9.7, and 10.9 mg/liter ( P = 0.005), with 36%, 7%, and 6% over 15 mg/liter ( P < 0.0001). Bayesian AUC-guided dosing in years 2 and 3 was associated with fewer additional blood samples per subject (3.6, 2.0, and 2.4; P = 0.003), shorter therapy durations (8.2, 5.4, and 4.7 days; P = 0.03), and reduced nephrotoxicity (8%, 0%, and 2%; P = 0.01). The median inpatient stay was 20 days among nephrotoxic patients versus 6 days ( P = 0.002). There was no difference in efficacy by year, with 42% of patients having microbiologically proven infections. Compared to trough concentration targets, AUC-guided, Bayesian estimation-assisted vancomycin dosing was associated with decreased nephrotoxicity, reduced per-patient blood sampling, and shorter length of therapy, without compromising efficacy. These benefits have the potential for substantial cost savings. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01932034.)

Background Best practice to establish dosage regimens for “first-in-pediatric” clinical trials requires knowledge of efficacious and safe exposures in adults. Methods Pediatric equivalent doses were predicted for patients aged 6 months and Results As shown in the figure, an isavuconazonium sulfate dose of 10 mg/kg is expected to result in AUCss within the target range for the majority of patients >1 year old, in agreement with that predicted by allometry for patients aged 2–17 years. For patients aged 6 months to 1 year, a dose of 6 mg/kg predicts comparable exposures. Conclusion A proposed isavuconazonium sulfate dose of 10 mg/kg administered every 8 hours for the first 2 days and once daily thereafter is predicted to result in safe and efficacious steady state exposures in patients aged 1–17 years, similar to predictions from allometric scaling for patients aged 2–17 years. For subjects aged 6 months to 1 year, a dose of 6 mg/kg is predicted to achieve similar exposures. These doses should be tested in clinical trials to confirm. Disclosures A. Desai, Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Employee, Salary. L. Kovanda, Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Employee, Salary. C. Lademacher, Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Employee, Salary. W. Hope, F2G: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant. Astellas: Grant Investigator and Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. Pfizer: Grant Investigator, Research support. Gilead: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. P. Bonate, Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Employee, Salary. A. Edginton, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee.

Serum penicillin G falls to low levels 2 weeks after injection as benzathine penicillin G (BPG) in young adults. Using Pmetrics and previously reported penicillin G pharmacokinetic data after 1.2 million units were given as BPG to 329 male military recruits, here we develop the first reported population pharmacokinetic model of penicillin G after BPG injection. We simulated time-concentration profiles over a broad range of pediatric and adult weights after alternative doses and dose frequencies to predict the probability of maintaining serum penicillin G concentrations of >0.02 mg/liter, a proposed protective threshold against group A Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS). The final population model included linear absorption into a central compartment, distribution to and from a peripheral compartment, and linear elimination from the central compartment, with allometrically scaled volumes and rate constants. With 1.2 million units of BPG given intramuscularly every 4 weeks in four total doses, only 23.2% of 5,000 simulated patients maintained serum penicillin G trough concentrations of >0.02 mg/liter 4 weeks after the last dose. When the doses were 1.8 million units and 2.4 million units, the percentages were 30.2% and 40.7%, respectively. With repeated dosing of 1.2 million units every 3 weeks and every 2 weeks for 4 doses, the percentages of simulated patients with a penicillin G trough concentration of >0.02 mg/liter were 37.8% and 65.2%, respectively. Our simulations support recommendations for more frequent rather than higher BPG doses to prevent recurrent rheumatic heart disease in areas of high GAS prevalence or during outbreaks.

Background. Meropenem plus levofloxacin treatment was shown to be a promising combination in our in vitro hollow fiber infection model. We strove to validate this finding in a murine Pseudomonas pneumonia model. Methods. A dose-ranging study with meropenem and levofloxacin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was performed in a granulocytopenic murine pneumonia model. Meropenem and levofloxacin were administered to partially humanize their pharmacokinetic profiles in mouse serum. Total and resistant bacterial populations were estimated after 24 hours of therapy. Pharmacokinetic profiling of both drugs was performed in plasma and epithelial lining fluid, using a population model. Results. Meropenem and levofloxacin penetrations into epithelial lining fluid were 39.3% and 64.3%, respectively. Both monotherapies demonstrated good exposure responses. An innovative combination-therapy analytic approach demonstrated that the combination was statistically significantly synergistic (α = 2.475), as was shown in the hollow fiber infection model. Bacterial resistant to levofloxacin and meropenem was seen in the control arm. Levofloxacin monotherapy selected for resistance to itself. No resistant subpopulations were observed in any combination therapy arm. Conclusions. The combination of meropenem plus levofloxacin was synergistic, producing good bacterial kill and resistance suppression. Given the track record of safety of each agent, this combination may be worthy of clinical trial.

While pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets for vancomycin therapy are recognized for invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, scant data are available to guide therapy for other Gram-positive infections. A retrospective single-center cohort of patients with Enterococcus bacteremia hospitalized between 1 January 2009 and 31 May 2015 were studied. The average vancomycin AUC 0–24 was computed using a Bayesian approach. The MIC was determined by gradient diffusion (Etest; bioMérieux), and the average AUC 0–24 /MIC value over the initial 72 h of therapy was calculated. We assessed 30-day all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to identify the vancomycin AUC 0–24 /MIC value associated with 30-day mortality. Fifty-seven patients with enterococcal bacteremia (32 E. faecium , 21 E. faecalis , and 4 other Enterococcus spp.) were studied. The median vancomycin MIC was 0.75 mg/liter (range, 0.38 to 3 mg/liter). All-cause 30-day mortality occurred in 10 of 57 patients (17.5%). A CART-derived vancomycin AUC/MIC Etest value of ≥389 was associated with reduced mortality ( P = 0.017); failure to achieve this independently predicted 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 6.83 [95% confidence interval = 1.51 to 30.84]; P = 0.01). We found that a vancomycin AUC/MIC Etest value of ≥389 achieved within 72 h was associated with reduced mortality. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to verify the vancomycin pharmacodynamic targets associated with maximal clinical outcomes and acceptable safety.

Objectives The overall study aim was to identify the relevant preclinical teicoplanin pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) indices to predict efficacy and suppression of resistance in MRSA infection. Methods A hollow-fibre infection model and a neutropenic murine thigh infection model were developed. The PK/PD data generated were modelled using a non-parametric population modelling approach with Pmetrics. The posterior Bayesian estimates derived were used to study the exposure-effect relationships. Monte Carlo simulations from previously developed population PK models in adults and children were conducted to explore the probability of target attainment (PTA) for teicoplanin dosage regimens against the current EUCAST WT susceptibility range. Results There was a concentration-dependent activity of teicoplanin in both the in vitro and in vivo models. A total in vivo AUC/MIC of 610.4 (total AUC of 305.2 mg·h/L) for an MRSA strain with an MIC of 0.5 mg/L was needed for efficacy (2 log10 cell kill) against a total bacterial population. A total AUC/MIC ratio of ∼1500 (total AUC of ∼750 mg·h/L) was needed to suppress the emergence of resistance. The PTA analyses showed that adult and paediatric patients receiving a standard regimen were only successfully treated for the in vivo bactericidal target if the MIC was ≤0.125 mg/L in adults and ≤0.064 mg/L in children. Conclusions This study improves our understanding of teicoplanin PD against MRSA and defines an in vivo AUC/MIC target for efficacy and suppression of resistance. Additional studies are needed to further corroborate the PK/PD index in a variety of infection models and in patients.

Vancomycin has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic relationship for AKI is not well defined. Allometrically scaled vancomycin exposures were used to assess the relationship between vancomycin exposure and AKI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received clinical-grade vancomycin in normal saline (NS) as intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections for 24- to 72-h durations with doses ranging 0 to 200 mg/kg of body weight divided once or twice daily. Urine was collected over the protocol's final 24 h. Renal histopathology was qualitatively scored. Urinary biomarkers (e.g., cystatin C, clusterin, kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1], osteopontin, lipocalin 2/neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin 2) were assayed using a Luminex xMAP system. Plasma vancomycin concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. A three-compartment vancomycin pharmacokinetic model was fit to the data with the Pmetrics package for R. The exposure-response in the first 24 h was evaluated using Spearman's nonparametric correlation coefficient (rs) values for the area under the concentration-time curve during the first 24 h (AUC0-24), the maximum concentration in plasma during the first 24 h (Cmax0-24 ), and the lowest (minimum) concentration in plasma after the dose closest to 24 h (Cmin0-24 ). A total of 52 rats received vancomycin (n = 42) or NS (n = 10). The strongest exposure-response correlations were observed between AUC0-24 and Cmax0-24 and urinary AKI biomarkers. Exposure-response correlations (rs values) for AUC0-24, Cmax0-24 , and Cmin0-24 were 0.37, 0.39, and 0.22, respectively, for clusterin; 0.42, 0.45, and 0.26, respectively, for KIM-1; and 0.52, 0.55, and 0.42, respectively, for osteopontin. However, no differences in histopathological scores were observed. Optimal sampling times after administration of the i.p. dose were 0.25, 0.75, 2.75, and 8 h for the once-daily dosing schemes and 0.25, 1.25, 14.5, and 17.25 h for the twice-daily dosing schemes. Our observations suggest that AUC0-24 or Cmax0-24 correlates with increases in urinary AKI biomarkers.

Summary An analysis of serial galactomannan index (GMI) in patients with invasive aspergillosis from a phase 3 clinical trial demonstrated that increases in GMI in the first week of therapy significantly increase the likelihood of death and unsuccessful response., Background. The ability to make early therapeutic decisions when treating invasive aspergillosis using changes in biomarkers as a surrogate for therapeutic response could significantly improve patient outcome. Methods. Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression were used to correlate early changes in galactomannan index (GMI) to mortality and overall response, respectively, from patients with positive baseline GMI (≥0.5) and serial GMI during treatment from a phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of invasive mold disease. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis in patients with isavuconazole plasma concentrations was conducted to establish the exposure necessary for GMI negativity at the end of therapy. Results. The study included 158 patients overall and 78 isavuconazole patients in the PK/PD modeling. By day 7, GMI increases of >0.25 units from baseline (3/130 survivors; 9/28 who died) significantly increased the risk of death compared to those with no increase or increases

Piperacillin-tazobactam is frequently used for empirical and targeted therapy of infections in critically ill patients. Considerable pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is observed in critically ill patients. By estimating an individual's PK, dosage optimization Bayesian estimation techniques can be used to calculate the appropriate piperacillin regimen to achieve desired drug exposure targets. The aim of this study was to establish a population PK model for piperacillin in critically ill patients and then analyze the performance of the model in the dose optimization software program BestDose. Linear, with estimated creatinine clearance and weight as covariates, Michaelis-Menten (MM) and parallel linear/MM structural models were fitted to the data from 146 critically ill patients with nosocomial infection. Piperacillin concentrations measured in the first dosing interval, from each of 8 additional individuals, combined with the population model were embedded into the dose optimization software. The impact of the number of observations was assessed. Precision was assessed by (i) the predicted piperacillin dosage and by (ii) linear regression of the observed-versus-predicted piperacillin concentrations from the second 24 h of treatment. We found that a linear clearance model with creatinine clearance and weight as covariates for drug clearance and volume of distribution, respectively, best described the observed data. When there were at least two observed piperacillin concentrations, the dose optimization software predicted a mean piperacillin dosage of 4.02 g in the 8 patients administered piperacillin doses of 4.00 g. Linear regression of the observed-versus-predicted piperacillin concentrations for 8 individuals after 24 h of piperacillin dosing demonstrated an r 2 of >0.89. In conclusion, for most critically ill patients, individualized piperacillin regimens delivering a target serum piperacillin concentration is achievable. Further validation of the dosage optimization software in a clinical trial is required.

Objective: Pharmacokinetic interactions exist between combined oral contraceptives and protease inhibitors (PI). However, such information is lacking for progestin-only oral contraception. We sought to define the steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between norethindrone (NET) and PI in HIV-infected women. Methods and Design: We conducted an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized trial to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of serum NET in HIV-infected women receiving PI compared with a control group of HIV-infected women receiving other noninteracting drugs. After 21 days of 0.35 mg of NET ingestion once daily, serial serum samples were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The area under the curve between 0 and 72 hours after ingestion was calculated by trapezoidal approximation. Results: Thirty-five women were enrolled, 2 withdrew. Sixteen women in the PI group and 17 controls completed the study. NET half-life and maximum concentration were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Minimum concentration of NET was significantly higher in the PI group (P = 0.01). The ratio of the geometric mean NET area under the curve in the PI group compared with controls was 1.5 (90% confidence interval: 1.21 to 1.86). NET serum concentrations were significantly higher in HIV-infected women taking a PI compared with controls (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Coadministration of PI inhibits NET metabolism as shown by higher serum NET area under the curve levels, a surrogate marker for therapeutic contraceptive efficacy. This study supports the increased utilization of progestin-only pills in HIV-infected women receiving certain PI regimens.

Ceftazidime is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with high-level activity against a variety of Gram-negative pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Improved outcomes are associated with cumulative percentages of a 24-h period that the drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (% T MIC ) of >45 to 70% of the dosing interval. Optimal dosing to achieve a 90% probability of target attainment (PTA) in patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) is unknown. We used existing data from six anephric adults receiving hemodialysis to construct a population model with the Pmetrics package for R. From the final model's joint probability density, we simulated the PTA for various ceftazidime dosing regimens, HFHD schedules, and organism MICs. For HFHD every 48 h and 1 g of ceftazidime given posthemodialysis, the PTA exceeds 90% for all isolates with MICs of ≤8 μg/ml, assuming a goal of 70% T MIC . For 72-h dialysis intervals, postdialysis dosing of 1 g is adequate for achievement of the 70% T MIC goal only for organisms with MICs of ≤4 μg/ml, while 2 g is adequate for organisms with MICs of ≤8 μg/ml. A dose of 500 mg once daily, regardless of HFHD schedule, has a 90% PTA for organisms with MICs of ≤16 μg/ml, while 1 g once daily may achieve 100% PTA even for resistant organisms with a MIC of 32 μg/ml. Therefore, to ensure maximal ceftazidime activity, once-daily dosing of 500 mg to 1 g ceftazidime in patients receiving HFHD may be preferable for critically ill patients when MIC data are unavailable and for more resistant organisms with ceftazidime MICs of 16 to 32 μg/ml.

Management of nosocomial pneumonia is frequently complicated by bacterial resistance. Extended infusions of beta-lactams are increasingly being used to improve clinical outcomes. However, the impact of this strategy on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance is not known. A hollow-fiber infection model with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1) was used. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of piperacillin-tazobactam similar to those in humans were simulated over 5 days. Three dosages of piperacillin-tazobactam were administered over 0.5 h or 4 h, with redosing every 8 h. Two initial bacterial densities were investigated (∼10 4 CFU/ml and ∼10 7 CFU/ml). The time courses of the total bacterial population and the resistant subpopulation were determined. All data were described using a mathematical model, which was then used to define the relationship between drug concentrations, bacterial killing, and emergence of piperacillin resistance. There was logarithmic growth in controls in the initial 24 h, reaching a plateau of ∼9 log 10 CFU/ml. Bacterial killing following administration of piperacillin via bolus dosing and that after extended infusions were similar. For the lower initial bacterial density, trough total plasma piperacillin concentration/MIC ratios of 3.4 and 10.4 for bolus and extended-infusion regimens, respectively, were able to suppress the emergence of piperacillin resistance. For the higher initial bacterial density, all regimens were associated with progressive growth of a resistant subpopulation. A stratified approach, according to bacterial density, is required to treat patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Antimicrobial monotherapy may be sufficient for some patients. However, for patients with a high bacterial burden, alternative therapeutic strategies are required to maximize bacterial killing and prevent antimicrobial resistance.

In adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only antiretroviral regimens (NOARs) with ≥3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are less potent than highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Published pediatric experience with NOARs is limited; thus, we wished to better define the virological, immunological and toxicological effects of NOARs in children and adolescents.We analyzed data from NOAR-treated participants in LEGACY, a multicenter observational cohort study of HIV-infected children and adolescents. NOAR-treated case-participants were matched to participants without prior NOAR who initiated HAART during the same year for comparison.Of 575 participants with data from time of HIV diagnosis through 2006, 67 (12%) received NOARs for at least 24 weeks; most (46%) received the fixed dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir. NOAR use peaked in 2001 to 2002. NOAR-treated participants were significantly older and more treatment experienced than HAART-treated participants. Virologic outcomes, including the percentage of participants with a plasma HIV RNA viral load400 copies/mL at week 24 (47% versus 34%) and the mean 24-week change in log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load from baseline (-0.63 versus -1.02), were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but virologic rebound was more likely in NOAR-treated participants (77% versus 54%, P = 0.02). Increase in CD4 percentage points from baseline to 24 weeks was negligible in NOAR-treated participants compared with HAART-treated participants (0.95% versus 10.1%, P0.001). Anemia and leukopenia were more commonly reported with NOARs than HAART.Week 24 virologic outcomes were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but NOAR durability was poorer and their use was associated with less immunologic reconstitution. NOARs should play a limited role in pediatric and adolescent antiretroviral therapy.