Search

Background: Cancer‐associated weight loss (WL) associates with increased mortality. International consensus suggests that WL is driven by a variable combination of reduced food intake and/or altered metabolism, the latter often represented by the inflammatory biomarker C‐reactive protein (CRP). We aggregated data from Canadian and European research studies to evaluate the associations of reduced food intake and CRP with cancer‐associated WL (primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS, secondary endpoint). Methods: The data set included a total of 12,253 patients at risk for cancer‐associated WL. Patient‐reported WL history (% in 6 months) and food intake (normal, moderately, or severely reduced) were measured in all patients; CRP (mg/L) and OS were measured in N = 4960 and N = 9952 patients, respectively. All measures were from a baseline assessment. Clinical variables potentially associated with WL and overall survival (OS) including age, sex, cancer diagnosis, disease stage, and performance status were evaluated using multinomial logistic regression MLR and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. Results: Patients had a mean weight change of −7.3% (±7.1), which was categorized as: ±2.4% (stable weight; 30.4%), 2.5–5.9% (19.7%), 6.0–10.0% (23.2%), 11.0–14.9% (12.0%), ≥15.0% (14.6%). Normal food intake, moderately, and severely reduced food intake occurred in 37.9%, 42.8%, and 19.4%, respectively. In MLR, severe WL (≥15%) (vs. stable weight) was more likely (P < 0.0001) if food intake was moderately [OR 6.28, 95% confidence interval (CI 5.28–7.47)] or severely reduced [OR 18.98 (95% CI 15.30–23.56)]. In subset analysis, adjusted for food intake, CRP was independently associated (P < 0.0001) with ≥15% WL [CRP 10–100 mg/L: OR 2.00, (95% CI 1.58–2.53)] and [CRP > 100 mg/L: OR 2.30 (95% CI 1.62–3.26)]. Diagnosis, stage, and performance status, but not age or sex, were significantly associated with WL. Median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI 9.5–10.3), with median follow‐up of 39.7 months (95% CI 38.8–40.6). Moderately and severely reduced food intake and CRP independently predicted OS (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Modelling WL as the dependent variable is an approach that can help to identify clinical features and biomarkers associated with WL. Here, we identify criterion values for food intake impairment and CRP that may improve the diagnosis and classification of cancer‐associated cachexia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Lung cancer patients frequently present with weight loss in the context of the cachexia syndrome. Despite its high clinical significance, definite diagnostic criteria of cachexia are lacking. Nutritional screening questionnaires, like the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), have been proposed for the timely diagnosis of the syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of MNA with laboratory markers of inflammation/cachexia in patients with metastatic lung cancer. The prognostic value of the measured parameters was also examined. Patients and methods: Patients with metastatic lung cancer referred for systemic therapy were eligible. Baseline clinical characteristics were recorded and nutritional status was assessed using MNA. Blood samples were also collected and the following parameters were measured: hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (Alb), C-reactive protein (CRP), ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin and insulin growth factor I (IGF-I). Results: Totally, 115 patients (101 males) [median age 66 years (range 32–86)] were evaluated. According to MNA score, 27 (23.5%) patients were well nourished, 59 (51.3%) were at nutritional risk and 29 (25.2%) were already malnourished at diagnosis. MNA correlated with the following parameters: Hb (p =0.001), albumin (p <0.001), CRP (p =0.002), adiponectin (p =0.037) and leptin (p =0.008). After a median follow up of 38.2 months, multivariate analysis revealed that age (p =0.008), number of metastatic sites (p <0.001), MNA (p =0.044) and leptin (p =0.004) independently correlated with overall survival. Conclusions: Based on the MNA, the majority of patients were either malnourished or at nutritional risk. MNA correlated with laboratory parameters related to inflammation/cachexia and was independently associated with survival. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives In patients with advanced incurable lung cancer deciding as to the most appropriate treatment (e.g. chemotherapy or supportive care only) is challenging. In such patients the TNM classification system has reached its ceiling therefore other factors are used to assess prognosis and as such, guide treatment. Performance status (PS), weight loss and inflammatory biomarkers (Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)) predict survival in advanced lung cancer however these have not been compared. This study compares key prognostic factors in advanced lung cancer. Materials and methods Patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer were recruited and demographics, weight loss, other prognostic factors (mGPS, PS) were collected. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to compare these prognostic factors. Results 390 patients with advanced incurable lung cancer were recruited; 341 were male, median age was 66 years (IQR 59–73) and patients had stage IV non-small cell ( n = 288) (73.8%) or extensive stage small cell lung cancer ( n = 102) (26.2%). The median survival was 7.8 months. On multivariate analysis only performance status (HR 1.74 CI 1.50–2.02) and mGPS (HR 1.67, CI 1.40–2.00) predicted survival ( p < 0.001). Survival at 3 months ranged from 99% (ECOG 0–1) to 74% (ECOG 2) and using mGPS, from 99% (mGPS0) to 71% (mGPS2). In combination, survival ranged from 99% (mGPS 0, ECOG 0–1) to 33% (mGPS2, ECOG 3). Conclusion Performance status and the mGPS are superior prognostic factors in advanced lung cancer. In combination, these improved survival prediction compared with either alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Anorexia and muscle wasting are frequently observed in cancer patients and influence their clinical outcome. The better understanding of the mechanisms underlying behavioral changes and altered metabolism yielded to the development of specialized nutritional support, which enhances utilization of provided calories and proteins by counteracting some of the metabolic derangements occurring during tumor growth. Inflammation appears to be a key factor determining the cancer-associated biochemical abnormalities eventually leading to anorexia and cachexia. Interestingly, inflammation is also involved in carcinogenesis, cancer progression and metastasis by impairing immune surveillance, among other mechanisms. Therefore, nutritional interventions aiming at modulating inflammation to restore nutritional status may also result in improved response to pharmacological anti-cancer therapies. Recent clinical data show that supplementation with nutrients targeting inflammation and immune system increases response rate and survival in cancer patients. This suggests that nutrition therapy should be considered as an important adjuvant strategy in the multidimensional approach to cancer patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]