1. Identification of novel myelodysplastic syndromes prognostic subgroups by integration of inflammation, cell-type composition, and immune signatures in the bone marrow.
- Author
-
Gerlevik S, Seymen N, Hama S, Mumtaz W, Thompson IR, Jalili SR, Kaya DE, Iacoangeli A, Pellagatti A, Boultwood J, Napolitani G, Mufti GJ, and Karimi MM
- Subjects
- Humans, Prognosis, Serine-Arginine Splicing Factors genetics, Serine-Arginine Splicing Factors metabolism, Mutation, RNA Splicing Factors genetics, RNA Splicing Factors metabolism, Bone Marrow immunology, Cohort Studies, Retroelements genetics, Myelodysplastic Syndromes immunology, Myelodysplastic Syndromes genetics, Inflammation genetics, Inflammation immunology
- Abstract
Mutational profiles of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have established that a relatively small number of genetic aberrations, including SF3B1 and SRSF2 spliceosome mutations, lead to specific phenotypes and prognostic subgrouping. We performed a multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA) on two published MDS cohorts of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) and CD34 + cells with three data modalities (clinical, genotype, and transcriptomics). Seven different views, including immune profile, inflammation/aging, retrotransposon (RTE) expression, and cell-type composition, were derived from these modalities to identify the latent factors with significant impact on MDS prognosis. SF3B1 was the only mutation among 13 mutations in the BMMNC cohort, indicating a significant association with high inflammation. This trend was also observed to a lesser extent in the CD34 + cohort. Interestingly, the MOFA factor representing the inflammation shows a good prognosis for MDS patients with high inflammation. In contrast, SRSF2 mutant cases show a granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (GMP) pattern and high levels of senescence, immunosenescence, and malignant myeloid cells, consistent with their poor prognosis. Furthermore, MOFA identified RTE expression as a risk factor for MDS. This work elucidates the efficacy of our integrative approach to assess the MDS risk that goes beyond all the scoring systems described thus far for MDS., Competing Interests: SG, NS, SH, WM, IT, SJ, DK, AI, AP, JB, GN, GM No competing interests declared, MK Reviewing editor, eLife, (© 2024, Gerlevik, Seymen, Hama et al.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF