Search

Background: Thiopurine co-therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents is associated with higher anti-TNFα drug levels and reduced immunogenicity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Aims: We aimed to evaluate the association between 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and anti-TNFα levels and the optimal 6-TGN threshold level associated with higher anti-TNFα levels in combination therapy., Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study of patients with IBD on combination anti-TNFα and thiopurine maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were infliximab and adalimumab levels. Secondary outcomes were antibodies to infliximab (ATI) or adalimumab (ATA). Univariable and multivariable linear regression were performed to identify variables associated with anti-TNFα levels. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define the optimal 6-TGN cut-off levels associated with therapeutic anti-TNFα levels., Results: The study included 743 paired 6-TGN and anti-TNFα levels (640 infliximab and 103 adalimumab). 6-TGN levels were associated with infliximab levels, but not adalimumab levels, on univariable and multivariable regression. The optimal 6-TGN cut-off associated with therapeutic infliximab levels (≥5 mcg/mL) was 261 pmol/8 × 10 8 red blood cell (RBC) (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.57) for standard infliximab dosing and 227.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.58) for escalated dosing. For therapeutic adalimumab levels (≥7.5 mcg/mL), the 6-TGN cut-off was 218.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.59) for standard adalimumab dosing and 237.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.63) for escalated dosing., Conclusion: 6-TGN levels were weakly associated with infliximab but not adalimumab levels in combination therapy. 6-TGN levels in the lower end of the therapeutic range (230-260 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC) may be adequate to maintain higher infliximab levels, particularly with escalated infliximab dosing., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Introduction: The approval of biosimilars in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) has offered an answer to a growing concern about healthcare costs, and availability of treatments. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate proof of biosimilars effectiveness as treatment in Crohn's disease (CD)., Areas Covered: Since 2013, the European Medicines Agency has approved five biosimilars for infliximab and eight for adalimumab. Initial data leading to approval were extrapolated from studies conducted in patients with rheumatological or dermatological diseases, but recent studies filled the gap of clinical data among patients with IBD. In this review, 75 studies were included, with data from a total of 20 707 patients with CD. Clinical data on biosimilars in the treatment of CD show equivalence in terms of efficacy, either as induction or maintenance of treatment and regardless of previous exposure to originator or other biosimilar., Expert Opinion: Since biosimilar market entry, utilization of infliximab increased by 89.9% and by 22.4% for adalimumab in European countries. With a 10-year insight since the first approval of biosimilar in Europe, biosimilars prescriptions should be implemented in routine clinical practice given the efficacy and safety profile.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consists of two primary types: Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) and Adalimumab (ADA) are frequently utilized in the management of moderate to severe cases of IBD., Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe IBD., Method: This study is a prospective open-labeled randomized parallel study that included moderate to severe IBD patients treated with either IFX or ADA. A total of 56 patients participated, with 34 patients received IFX and 22 patients received ADA. Various measures, including Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Mayo Score/ Disease Activity Index (DAI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were taken at baseline and week 14 to assess the efficacy of the treatments. In addition, the levels of drugs and sTREM-1 were measured at 14 weeks. Patient safety was monitored throughout the study period., Results: In the group received IFX, there was a notable decrease in CDAI (P = 0.045), DAI (P = 0.026), and CRP (P = 0.023 for CD, and P = 0.021 for UC) levels. In addition, the group received ADA experienced a significant reduction in CDAI (P = 0.001), DAI (P = 0.032), and CRP (P < 0.018 for CD and P = 0.003 for UC) levels. Responders had higher drug concentrations than non-responders, notably IFX concentration was higher in responders with CD (P = 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001). ADA concentration was higher in UC (P <= 0.001) and all CD patients responded to the treatment. The same trend was observed for sTREM-1 levels in CD and UC patients (P = 0.042, and P = 0.015, respectively) in the IFX group. In UC patients treated with ADA, the level of sTREM-1 was significantly low (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Both IFX and ADA have a good safety profile and deliver a beneficial clinical and laboratory response in moderate-severe IBD patients., Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05291039. (You can access the study at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05291039 (First Posted: March 22, 2022)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Biological treatments (BTs) are essential in managing pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (PIBDs). Elevated liver enzymes sometimes succeed BT, yet elucidating studies are scarce. We addressed liver biochemistry after introducing BT and searched for their determinants., Methods: We identified PIBD patients receiving infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab at the Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland, in 2000-2023, and followed their alanine transaminase (ALT) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GT) levels for 24 months. ALT was categorized based on the age- and sex-specific upper limit of normal. We disregarded 46 patients with underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis with/without autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), pretreatment AIH diagnosis, and elevated liver enzymes at the beginning of BT from the analyses., Results: Of 618 BT episodes in 403 patients, 22.2% exhibited increased ALT or GT (ALT in 117, GT in 4, and both ALT/GT in 16 episodes). Of all ALT elevations (n = 133), 41.4% occurred within the first 3 months. ALT elevation was more common after infliximab (representing 59.5% of BTs) than other BTs (25.9% vs. 14.2%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-4.72). AIH followed 1.5% (n = 9) of BT episodes. Ninety-five percent of ALT elevations resolved within 6 months. Antibiotic exposure (particularly to metronidazole) was associated with ALT elevation in general (adjusted OR: 5.76, 95% CI: 2.40-13.9) and short disease duration before starting BT with notable ALT elevation (adjusted OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22)., Conclusions: Benign ALT elevation is common within 3 months after starting BT (especially infliximab) and scarcely led to cessation of the treatment. AIH is a rare finding during the first year of BT., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can be used to leverage physiological and in vitro data to predict monoclonal antibody (mAb) concentrations in serum and tissues. However, it is currently not known how consistent predictions of mAb disposition are across PBPK modelling platforms. In this work PBPK simulations of IgG, adalimumab and infliximab were compared between three platforms (Simcyp, PK-Sim, and GastroPlus). Accuracy of predicted serum and tissue concentrations was assessed using observed data collected from the literature. Physiological and mAb related input parameters were also compared and sensitivity analyses were carried out to evaluate model behavior when input values were altered. Differences in serum kinetics of IgG between platforms were minimal for a dose of 1 mg/kg, but became more noticeable at higher dosages (> 100 mg/kg) and when reference (healthy) physiological input values were altered. Predicted serum concentrations of both adalimumab and infliximab were comparable across platforms, but were noticeably higher than observed values. Tissue concentrations differed remarkably between the platforms, both for total- and interstitial fluid (ISF) concentrations. The accuracy of total tissue concentrations was within a three-fold of observed values for all tissues, except for brain tissue concentrations, which were overpredicted. Predictions of tissue ISF concentrations were less accurate and were best captured by GastroPlus. Overall, these simulations show that the different PBPK platforms generally predict similar mAb serum concentrations, but variable tissue concentrations. Caution is therefore warranted when PBPK models are used to simulate effect site tissue concentrations of mAbs without data to verify the predictions., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

A review of laboratory results across New Zealand for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) over 4 years was completed. Of 6591 results, the median serum concentration for infliximab was 5.7 mg/L and for adalimumab was 5.5 mg/L. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations (<7 mg/L) were measured in 54% of samples. Drug concentrations <2 mg/L were measured in 23% of samples, with ADAs detected in 51% of these. The high number of samples with subtherapeutic drug concentrations and common ADA detection is consistent with failing therapy but could also suggest that standard dosing is frequently too low for patients. These results reinforce the value of antitumour necrosis factor drug TDM in making decisions to adjust dosing or switch agents in patients taking infliximab and adalimumab., (© 2023 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate., Aims: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success., Methods: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly., Results: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation., Conclusion: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The hypothesis of the study was that polymorphisms in promoter regions -238 and -308 of TNF-α could be associated with different clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD). The aim was to examine the possible association of both polymorphisms with concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (fCAL), onset of the remission and development of the ADA in patients on therapy with anti-TNF inhibitors. The prospective study was done in patients with IBD and IMRD on infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADM). Patients were genotyped for TNF-α -238 and -308 polymorphisms. The concentration of CRP, fCAL, IFX or ADM and antibodies to drugs were measured according to manufacturer's instructions and followed-up for 6 or 12 months. Out of all patients (N = 112), number of patients in remission did not differ according to genotypes (for IBD patients P = 0.509 vs 0.223; for IMRD patients P = 0.541 vs 0.132 for TNF-α -238 and -308, respectively). Initial CRP concentration was higher in IBD patients with TNF-α -308 GG than GA/AA genotypes in patients who failed to achieve remission [11.8 (4.4-39.6) vs 3.1 (1.5-6.5), P = 0.033]. In IBD patients with remission, fCAL concentration after at least 6 months of therapy was higher in TNF-α-308 GG than in GA genotype [52 (25-552) vs 20 (20-20) µg/g, P = 0.041]. Our results showed the association of TNF-α -308 GG genotype with a higher concentration of CRP and fecal calprotectin in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on IFX or ADM therapy. Clinical remission and development of antibodies to anti-TNF drugs were not associated with TNF-α -238 and -308 polymorphisms., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Management of uveitis displays a particular challenge in childhood. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric noninfectious uveitis that were refractory to conventional immunosuppresives. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 33 patients who were treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (16 with IFX and 17 with ADA). Patients had diverse etiologies, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, idiopathic uveitis, and Behçet's disease. Demographic characteristics, systemic diagnosis, findings of the ophthalmological examination, control of ocular inflammation, response to treatment, and the rate of clinical remission were studied. Results: Fourteen (87.5%) patients receiving IFX and 10 (58.8%) patients receiving ADA achieved response to treatment during the follow-up ( P  = 0.118). The agents were discontinued with complete clinical remission in 6 (37.5%) patients receiving IFX and in 2 (11.8%) patients receiving ADA ( P  = 0.118). Baseline visual acuities and parameters of inflammation improved significantly in both groups after anti-TNF therapy. Conclusion: Both IFX and ADA are safe and effective for pediatric noninfectious uveitis.

Background/aims: The tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab are standard treatments for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there has been no headto- head comparison of treatment efficacy and outcomes between the two agents. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and long-term outcomes of infliximab versus adalimumab treatment in biologic-naïve patients with UC., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 113 biologic-naïve patients with UC who were treated between September 2012 and December 2017 (the infliximab group [n=83] and the adalimumab group [n=30]). We compared remission and response rates between these groups at 8 and 52 weeks. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to compare long-term outcomes, and logistic regression analysis and Cox-proportional hazard regression models to assess factors affecting outcomes., Results: The median follow-up duration was 25.8 months. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rate of clinical remission or clinical response at 8 or 52 weeks. Multivariate analyses also showed that long-term outcomes were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 2.56; p=0.208). An elevated C-reactive protein level (greater than 5 mg/L) was a significant predictive factor for poor outcomes (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.70; p=0.001). During the follow-up period, the rates of adverse event were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.441)., Conclusions: In our study, infliximab and adalimumab had similar treatment efficacy and longterm outcomes in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe UC.

Objective: To summarize evidence regarding efficacy of anti-TNFα in childhood chronic uveitis, refractory to common DMARDs., Methods: An updated systematic search was conducted between November 2012 and January 2020. Studies investigating the efficacy of anti-TNFα therapy, in children of ages <16 years, as the first biologic treatment for childhood chronic uveitis, refractory to topical and/or systemic steroid and at least one DMARD were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group criteria. A combined estimate of the proportion of children responding to etanercept (ETA), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA) was determined., Results: We identified 1677 articles of which 37 articles were eligible. Three were randomized controlled trials, one on ETA and two on ADA, and were excluded from pooled analysis. From the observational studies, a total of 487 children were identified: 226 received ADA, 213 INF and 48 ETA. The proportion of responding children was 86% (95% CI: 76%, 95%) for ADA, 68% (95% CI: 50%, 85%) for INF and 36% (95% CI: 9%, 67%) for ETA. Pooled analysis showed clear differences (χ2 = 32.2, P < 0.0001): ADA and INF were both significantly superior to ETA (χ2 = 26.8, P < 0.0001, and χ2 = 7.41, P < 0.006, respectively), ADA significantly superior to INF (χ2 = 13.4, P < 0.0002)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis, consistent with recent randomized controlled trial data, suggests the efficacy of ADA and INF in childhood chronic uveitis treatment. However, ADA results were superior to those of INF in this clinical setting., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: There are few comparative data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Historical data for reference product/biosimilar intravenous infliximab, or adalimumab and etanercept, were pooled and compared with phase 3 study results for a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13, in a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42019149621)., Results: The authors identified 13 eligible controlled trials that randomized over 5400 participants to prespecified treatments of interest. Comparison with pooled historical data suggested a numerical advantage for CT-P13 SC over intravenous infliximab for almost every prespecified efficacy outcome evaluated, including Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate), Clinical/Simplified Disease Activity Index scores, American College of Rheumatology responses, and multiple measures of disease remission and low disease activity; for the majority of outcomes, there was no overlap in 95% confidence intervals between groups. A numerical advantage for CT-P13 SC was also observed for safety outcomes (adverse events, infections, and discontinuations). Similar, but less marked, trends were observed for comparison with historical efficacy and safety data for adalimumab/etanercept., Conclusion: CT-P13 SC offers an improved or similar benefit-to-harm ratio compared with infliximab (intravenous) and adalimumab/etanercept, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA.

Background: Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is an important treatment option for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who fail the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, although many questions about this option remain unanswered., Methods: The efficacy of the second anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in refractory UC patients who failed the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy was examined using the Mayo score as a measure of disease activity at week 8. The efficacy of the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy before treatment and at weeks 8 and 52 was also evaluated in real-world practice., Results: There were no significant differences in remission induction and maintenance between infliximab and adalimumab as the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in UC patients. Of 123 UC patients, 21 (17.1%) switched tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Eight (38.1%), 4 (19.0%), 7 (33.3%), and 2 (9.5%) patients switched from infliximab to adalimumab, infliximab to golimumab, adalimumab to infliximab, and adalimumab to golimumab, respectively. Three (100%) with intolerance to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, 5 (41.7%) with loss of response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, and 1 (20.0%) with no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy had clinical remission at week 8., Conclusions: Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is more effective for refractory UC patients who are intolerant and lose response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy rather than for those showing no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy. Patients with primary failure of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy should be switched to another class of drug.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A gyulladásos bélbetegségek kezelésében a tumornekrózisfaktor-alfa-ellenes (anti-TNFα) antitestek elsődleges választási lehetőséget jelentenek a kortikoszteroid- és immunmoduláns kezelésre refrakter páciensek kezelési stratégiájában. Ezek a hatóanyagok hatékonyak, ám hosszú távú hatásosságukkal kapcsolatban sok az ellentmondás. Célkitűzés: Vizsgálatunk célja megvizsgálni az anti-TNFα-terápia (infliximab [IFX], adalimumab [ADA]) hosszú távú hatékonyságát gyulladásos bélbetegek körében. Módszerek: Retrospektív, adatgyűjtéses vizsgálatunkba a Szegedi Tudományegyetem I. Sz. Belgyógyászati Klinikáján gondozott, 18-65 év közötti gyulladásos bélbetegeket vontunk be. Az adatgyűjtést a Klinika informatikai rendszeréből végeztük a betegek ambuláns megjelenéseinek kezelőlapjaiból, illetve a zárójelentésekből. Eredmények: 102 beteg adatait elemeztük (Crohn-beteg: 67 fő, colitis ulcerosás: 35 fő). A Crohn-betegség diagnózisát követően átlagosan 7,84 év, a colitis ulcerosa diagnózisát követően átlagosan 9,86 év telt el az első anti-TNFα-terápia elkezdéséig. Az első kezelési ciklus átlagosan 2,64 évig tartott, a ciklus végén az IFX-t kapó betegek 50%-ánál, az ADA-t kapó betegek 46%-ánál volt remisszióban a betegség. A második kezelési ciklus átlagosan 4,67 évig tartott, a ciklus végén az IFX-t kapó betegek 36%-a, az ADA-t kapó betegek 40%-a volt remisszióban. Az első, illetve a második kezelési ciklus alatt az allergiás reakciók gyakorisága IFX esetében 13% és 18%, ADA esetében 4% és 3% volt. A primer hatástalanság és a másodlagos hatásvesztés az első ciklusban IFX esetében 4% és 10,5%, ADA esetében 11,5% és 19% volt. A második kezelési ciklusban IFX esetében 9%-ban és 18%-ban, ADA esetében 23%-ban és 10%-ban jelentették a ciklus végét. Következtetés: Az anti-TNFα-terápiák eredményeink alapján hosszú távon is hatékonynak és biztonságosnak bizonyultak. Másodlagos hatásvesztés kisebb arányban fordult elő a vizsgált populációban az irodalmi adatokhoz képest. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(47): 1989-1994., Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment is reserved for steroid-dependent or steroid/immunomodulator-refractory inflammatory bowel diseases patients. These agents are effective, however, their long-term safety is still questionable., Objective: We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of two anti-TNFα therapies., Methods: In our retrospective study, we reviewed medical records via the administration system of the First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged. Female and male patients, aged between 18-65 years who received anti-TNFα therapy between 2010-2019 were enrolled., Results: 102 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were enrolled (Crohn's disease: 67, ulcerative colitis: 35). The first anti-TNFα therapy was introduced after an average 7.84 and 9.86 years from diagnosis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The first treatment period lasted for 2.64 years; 50% of patients receiving IFX and 46% of patients receiving ADA were in remission at the end of the period. The second treatment period lasted for 4.67 years, 36% of IFX-treated patients and 40% of ADA-treated patients were in remission at the end of the period. 13% and 18% of patients treated by IFX and 4% and 3% of patients treated by ADA experienced infusion reaction during the first and the second treatment period. Primary non-response and loss of response rates were 4% and 10.5% (IFX) and 11.5% and 19% (ADA) during the first treatment period. These rates were 9% and 18% (IFX) and 23% and 10% (ADA) during the second treatment period., Conclusion: Our study confirmed the long-term efficacy and safety of the anti-TNFα therapies. Loss of response rate is lower in our population compared to the literature. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(47): 1989-1994.

Background: Immunoassays based on label-free technologies (label-free immunoassay [LFIA]) offer an innovative approach to clinical diagnostics and demonstrate great promise for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs. An LFIA measures immunocomplex formation in real time and allows for quantification on initial binding rate, which facilitates fast measurement within a few minutes., Methods: Based on thin-film interferometry (TFI) technology, open-access LFIAs were developed for the quantification of the mAb drugs adalimumab (ADL) and infliximab (IFX) and for the detection of the antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to the mAb drugs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs)., Results: The LFIAs for active mAb drugs (ADL and IFX) and for ADAs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs) were validated. The analytical measurement range (AMR) for both ADL and IFX was from 2 to 100 μg/mL. The AMR for ADL-ADAs was from 5 to 100 μg/mL and for IFX-ADAs was 10 to 100 μg/mL. In the comparison of LFIAs and reporter gene assays, the correlation coefficient was 0.972 for the quantification of ADL and 0.940 for the quantification of IFX. The concordance rate was 90% for the detection of ADL-ADAs and 76% for the detection of IFX-ADAs., Conclusions: The LFIAs for active mAb drugs and ADAs were appropriate for the TDM of ADL and IFX. The TFI technology has unique advantages compared with other technologies used for the measurement of mAb drugs. Label-free technologies, especially those allowing for open-access LFIAs, have great potential for clinical diagnostics., (© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The use of biologic therapy for Crohn's disease [CD] continues to evolve, however, the effect of this on the requirement for surgery remains unclear. We assessed changes in biologic prescription and surgery over time in a population-based cohort., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all 1753 patients diagnosed with CD in Lothian, Scotland, between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2017, reviewing the electronic health record of each patient to identify all CD-related surgery and biologic prescription. Cumulative probability and hazard ratios for surgery and biologic prescription from diagnosis were calculated and compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis stratified by year of diagnosis into cohorts., Results: The 5-year cumulative risk of surgery was 20.4% in cohort 1 [2000-2004],18.3% in cohort 2 [2005-2008], 14.7% in cohort 3 [2009-2013], and 13.0% in cohort 4 [2014-2017] p <0.001. The 5-year cumulative risk of biologic prescription was 5.7% in cohort 1, 12.2% in cohort 2, 22.0% in cohort 3, and 44.9% in cohort 4 p <0.001., Conclusions: The increased and earlier use of biologic therapy in CD patients corresponded with a decreasing requirement for surgery over time within our cohort. This could mean that adopting a top-down or accelerated step-up treatment strategy may be effective at reducing the requirement for surgery in newly diagnosed CD., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Increasing the interval of administration of anti-TNF agents over the duration specified in the data sheet is not common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of IBD patients treated with this strategy., Methods: Patients with IBD who were treated with infliximab or adalimumab at intervals > 8 weeks or > 2 weeks, respectively, because of persistent clinical remission, were identified at local databases of the ENEIDA registry (a nationwide registry promoted by the Spanish Working Group in Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis-GETECCU) of two referral centers. Treatment success was considered if patients remained in clinical remission with the same schedule or without biological therapy at the end of follow-up, and if no return to the conventional schedule, dose-escalation, change in biological agent, or a course of systemic corticosteroids or surgery were required., Results: Eighty-five patients were included, 60 treated with infliximab and 25 with adalimumab. The spaced schedule was initiated after a median of 25 months on anti-TNF treatment (IQR 14-49). Throughout a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 21-47), fifty patients (59%) fulfilled the success criteria of the spaced strategy. No differences were found regarding type of IBD or anti-TNF agent. Baseline C-reactive protein levels and disease duration at the time of starting anti-TNF treatment were the only factors associated with treatment success., Conclusions: Anti-TNF administration at longer intervals than those provided in the data sheet may be an efficacious, convenient, and cheaper treatment option, particularly in patients in whom anti-TNF treatment was initiated early.

Around a 20-30% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are diagnosed before they are 18 years old. Anti-TNF drugs can induce and maintain remission in IBD, however, up to 30% of patients do not respond. The aim of the work was to identify markers that would predict an early response to anti-TNF drugs in pediatric patients with IBD. The study population included 43 patients aged <18 years with IBD who started treatment with infliximab or adalimumab. Patients were classified into primary responders ( n = 27) and non-responders to anti-TNF therapy ( n = 6). Response to treatment could not be analyzed in 10 patients. Response was defined as a decrease in over 15 points in the disease activity indexes from week 0 to week 10 of infliximab treatment or from week 0 to week 26 of adalimumab treatment. The expression profiles of nine genes in total RNA isolated from the whole-blood of pediatric IBD patients taken before biologic administration and after 2 weeks were analyzed using qPCR and the 2 -∆∆Ct method. Before initiation and after 2 weeks of treatment the expression of SMAD7 was decreased in patients who were considered as non-responders ( p value < 0.05). Changes in expression were also observed for TLR2 at T0 and T2, although that did not reach the level of statistical significance. In addition, the expression of DEFA5 decreased 1.75-fold during the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment in responders, whereas no changes were observed in non-responders. Expression of the SMAD7 gene is a pharmacogenomic biomarker of early response to anti-TNF agents in pediatric IBD. TLR2 and DEFA5 need to be validated in larger studies.

Background: Anti-TNF treatment may be useful for the treatment of patients with refractory juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The aim of this study was to describe the use of infliximab and adalimumab therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis as an adjunctive treatment., Methods: Sixty children recruited to the UK JDM Cohort and Biomarker Study that had received at least 3 months of anti-TNF treatment (infliximab or adalimumab) were studied. Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT8) and physician's global assessment (PGA) were recorded. Skin disease was assessed using the modified skin disease activity score (DAS). Data were analysed using Friedman's test for repeated measures analysis of variance., Results: Compared to baseline, there were improvements at 6 and 12 months in skin disease (χ 2 (2) = 15.52, p = 0.00043), global disease (χ 2 (2) = 8.14, p = 0.017) and muscle disease (CMAS χ 2 (2) = 17.02, p = 0.0002 and MMT χ 2 (2) = 10.56, p = 0.005) in infliximab patients. For patients who switched from infliximab to adalimumab, there was improvement in global disease activity (χ 2 (2) = 6.73, p = 0.03), and trends towards improvement in CMAS, MMT8 and modified DAS. The median initial prednisolone dose was 6 [0-10] mg, and final was 2.5 [0-7.5] mg (p < 0.0001). Fifty-four per cent of patients had a reduction in the number and/or size of calcinosis lesions. Twenty-five per cent switched their anti-TNF treatment from infliximab to adalimumab. 66.7%of the switches were to improve disease control, 26.7% due to adverse events and 6.6% due to patient preference. A total of 13.9 adverse reactions occurred in 100 patient-years, of which 5.7 were considered serious., Conclusion: Reductions in muscle and skin disease, including calcinosis, were seen following treatment with infliximab and adalimumab.

Background Conventional therapy of inflammatory bowel disease with traditional immunosuppressant medication is increasingly being replaced by biological agents. However, the response to these biological agents may be lost over time, with discontinuation being a marker of loss of effectiveness. There are few published reports on the treatment drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Objective This study compared the drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line treatments, identified factors associated with drug survival, and described reasons for treatment withdrawal. Setting A pharmacy department of a university hospital in Spain. Method A retrospective single-centre cohort study of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents between 2008 and 2017 at a regional referral hospital. The primary outcome was drug survival and associated factors during a follow-up of 52 months. Main outcome measure Drug survival of infliximab versus adalimumab. Results One hundred thirty-four patients with inflammatory bowel disease (73.9% Crohn's disease and 26.1% ulcerative colitis) were treated with biological therapy. The overall mean drug survival of first-line treatment with an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent was 18.6 months (SD 14.9), with mean values of 20.2 months (SD 16.6) for adalimumab and 17.1 months (SD 13.1) for infliximab. As a second-line treatment, the drug survival of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents was 17.9 months (SD 15.6), with mean values of 22.9 months (SD 17.1) for adalimumab and 12.5 months (SD 11.7) for infliximab. The difference in time to discontinuation at 52 months of follow-up between the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, as either first- or second-line treatment, was not statistically significant (p = 0.547 and p = 0.676, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was the only factor associated with greater drug survival in first-line treatment (HR 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.15-0.50) and second-line treatment (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.65). Secondary failure to treatment was the most frequent reason for withdrawal. Conclusion Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar drug survival as first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments. Therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with higher drug survival for both first- and second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor treatments.

Background: Evidence supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in improving efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on perceptions and barriers to TDM use are limited and no data are available from India. Our objective was to assess clinicians' attitudes and barriers to TDM use in IBD., Methods: A 16-question survey was distributed to members of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Information on clinician characteristics, demographics, use and barriers towards TDM with anti-TNFs was collected. Logistic regression was used to predict factors influencing TDM use., Results: Two hundred and forty-two respondents participated (92.5% male); 83% were consultant gastroenterologists. Of 104 respondents meeting inclusion criteria (treating > 5 IBD patients and at least 1 with an anti-TNF per month), complete responses were available for 101 participants. TDM was utilized by 20% (n = 20) of respondents. Of them, 89.5% (n = 17) used TDM for secondary loss of response; 73.7% (n = 14) for primary non-response and 5.3% (n = 1) proactively. Barriers to TDM use were cost (71.2%), availability (67.8%), time lag in results (58.7%) and the perception that TDM is time-consuming (45.7%). Clinicians treating > 30 IBD patients were more likely to check TDM (OR = 4.9, p = 0.02). Of 81 respondents not using TDM, 97.5% (n = 79) would do so if all the barriers were removed., Conclusion: Significant barriers to TDM use were availability, cost and time lag for results. If these barriers were removed, almost all the clinicians would use TDM at least reactively and 25% would use proactively. There is an urgent need to address these barriers and optimize anti-TNF therapy for optimal outcomes.

The generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is one of the most serious problems in therapy using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), because ADAs can impact the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mAbs. It is therefore important to detect the generated ADAs in patients. For the appropriate detection of ADAs, methods that detect various types of ADAs (e.g., low- and high-affinity ADAs) are needed, but since there are no adequate reference preparations of ADAs relevant to human ADAs in most cases, it is difficult to determine whether or not the developed methods have enough analytical performance. Here, we developed human-rat chimeric ADA panels against the anti-TNF-α therapeutic antibodies infliximab and adalimumab. The developed ADA panels consist of 7 (for infliximab) and 11 (for adalimumab) ADAs with various binding characters, and most of the ADAs are neutralizing antibodies. Using these ADA panels, we compared the detectability of model methods, i.e., binding assays using SPR, BLI, and ECL, and a cell-based assay to detect neutralization activity. Since we obtained ADAs showing low and high responses with the various methods, the ADA panels we developed were shown to be useful for the development of ADA assays., (Copyright © 2019 International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Data on the comparative effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are extremely limited, especially in the Asian population. We compared clinically important outcomes [colectomy, UC-related emergency room (ER) visits, UC-related hospitalizations, and need for corticosteroids] for these two biologics in biologic-naïve Korean patients with UC., Materials and Methods: Using National Health Insurance claims, we collected data on patients who were diagnosed with UC and exposed to IFX or ADA between 2010 and 2016., Results: A total of 862 new users of biologics were included, of whom 630 were treated with IFX and 232 were treated with ADA. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years after starting biologic therapy, there were no significant differences in the risk of colectomy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-11.63], ER visits (aHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79-3.16), hospitalizations (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.17), and corticosteroid use (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76-1.78) between IFX and ADA users. These results were stable even when only patients who used biologics for ≥6 months were analyzed. Additionally, these results were unchanged in patients treated with biologic monotherapy or combination therapy with immunomodulators., Conclusion: In this nationwide population-based study, there was no significant difference in the risk of colectomy, ER visits, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use between IFX and ADA users. Our findings indicate that IFX and ADA have comparable effectiveness in biologic-naïve Korean patients with UC., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020.)

Background: Biologics used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) may lose their effect over time, requiring patients to undergo dose escalation or treatment switching, and systematic literature reviews of real-world evidence on these topics are lacking. Aim: To summarize the occurrence and outcomes of dose escalation and treatment switching in UC patients in real-world evidence. Methods: Studies were searched through MEDLINE, MEDLINE IN PROCESS, Embase and Cochrane (2006-2017) as well as proceedings from three major scientific meetings. Results: In total, 41 studies were included in the review among which 35 covered dose escalation and 12 covered treatment switching of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist (anti-TNF) escalation for all patients included at induction ranged from 5% (6 months) to 50% (median 0.67 years) and 15.2% to 70.8% (8 weeks) for anti-TNF induction responders. Mean/median time to dose escalation on anti-TNF ranged from 1.84 to 11 months. The most common switching pattern, infliximab → adalimumab, occurred in 3.8% (median 5.6 years) to 25.5% (mean 3.3 years) of patients. Conclusions: Dose escalation and treatment switching of biologics may be considered as indicators of suboptimal therapy suggesting a lack of long-term remission and response under current therapies.

Background: In limited retrospective series, infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab have demonstrated efficacy in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Here, we report single-centre data of all biological therapies in refractory pouchitis., Methods: We retrospectively assessed all records from patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch -anal anastomosis who received infliximab, adalimumab or vedolizumab for pouchitis. Clinically relevant remission, defined as a modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index <5 and a reduction of modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index ≥2 points from baseline, was assessed at week 14., Results: Thirty-three unique patients were identified. Prior to colectomy, patients had been exposed to cyclosporine ( n  = 14), infliximab ( n  = 12), adalimumab ( n  = 3), and/or vedolizumab ( n  = 3). All developed chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, for which they received infliximab ( n  = 23), adalimumab ( n  = 13) or vedolizumab ( n  = 15). Clinically relevant remission was observed in 43.5% of patients in the infliximab group, and in 38.5% and 60.0% in the adalimumab and vedolizumab group, respectively. In the long-term, significantly more patients continued vedolizumab compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy (hazard ratio 3.0, p  = 0.04). Adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) explained 40.7% of the patients discontinuing anti-TNF therapy, whereas discontinuation of vedolizumab was only related to insufficient efficacy. Four patients eventually required a permanent ileostomy., Conclusion: In this case series of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, biological therapy was effective in the majority of patients and only a minority eventually required a permanent ileostomy. The use of anti-TNF agents was hampered by a high rate of adverse events, partly related to immunogenicity as some patients had been exposed to anti-TNF prior to colectomy. Vedolizumab was also efficacious and may provide a safe alternative in these chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis patients., (© Author(s) 2019.)

Introduction : In recent years, biosimilars of reference adalimumab (re-ADA), etanercept (re-ETN) and infliximab (re-IFX) have been licensed. In the absence of specific controlled studies, by the extrapolation principle, biosimilars have been approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Areas covered : To assess the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in PsA, the literature, present until 30 June 2019, was reviewed. The literature search was undertaken using the PubMed database to identify English-language papers focusing on biosimilar efficacy in PsA. No specific PsA study was found, and the results were retrieved from trials on different inflammatory rheumatic diseases that were also enrolling patients with PsA. Data on re-IFX biosimilar CT-P13 and re-ETN SB4 were found, but not on re-ADA biosimilars. The results showed a trend toward a reduced efficacy of biosimilars. However, considering the small number of PsA patients, the non-statistically-powered studies, and the inappropriate outcome measures, these results could have occurred by chance. Expert opinion : The few data do not allow to draw definitive conclusions, and emerging results suggest the need of specific trials, and of rigorous registries to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in PsA.

Objectives: Up to 40% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with anti-TNF drugs lose response within 1 year of treatment, therefore requiring drug optimization. Although higher drug trough levels (TLs) are associated with sustained clinical outcomes, there are concerns that they may be associated with a higher risk of adverse events (AEs). The aim was to evaluate the presence of a possible association between drug TLs and the occurrence of AEs in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF drugs. Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 113 IBD patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab, of whom 27 were in combination therapy with immunosuppressants. TLs were measured using a homogeneous mobility shift assay. Results: During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 1-144), we observed 103 AEs occurring in 58 patients. We found no statistically significant difference ( p  = .21) in median TLs between patients who did 6.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-36.2) or did not (7.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-20.7) experience an AE. No difference was observed in the rate of AEs between patients in mono- or combination therapy ( p  = .38), as well as between elderly (i.e., >65 years) and younger patients ( p  = .32). Considering a TL cutoff of 7 mcg/mL for infliximab and 12 mcg/mL for adalimumab, or even double these TL values, we observed no statistically significant difference in the rate of AEs occurrence. Conclusion: Our study suggests that, when clinically required, anti-TNF drug dosage may be increased without particular concerns regarding the risk of AEs occurrence in IBD patients, even in patients on combination therapy and elderly ones.

Uveitis is an ocular disease associated with systemic immune-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and ankylosing spondylitis; and infectious diseases. Infectious uveitis occasionally shows symptoms similar to those of non-infectious uveitis. Therefore, distinguishing between non-infectious and infectious uveitis is critical for definitive diagnosis and appropriate choice of treatment. Once the cause of infection is known, treatment can be promptly initiated. However, in contrast to infectious uveitis, non-infectious uveitis is more difficult to diagnose clinically. Eliminating the possibility of infectious uveitis is important because unlike the infectious type, non-infectious uveitis is treated with immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids and biological agents. Compared to other countries, the drugs available in Japan are limited. Cyclosporin A is the only immunosuppressive drug available for treating uveitis in Japan, and infliximab and adalimumab are the only biological drugs that have been approved for use in the treatment of uveitis in Japan. In this review, I describe the characteristics of typical non-infectious uveitis in Japan and its treatment methods.

Background/objectives: The development of psoriasis while on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is a paradoxical effect of agents that treat psoriasis. There is a paucity of data available on this entity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of TNFi-induced psoriasis in patients with JIA at two pediatric centers, and psoriasis response to therapeutic modifications., Methods: We performed retrospective chart review on patients with JIA treated with TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab) who developed psoriasis. TNFi-induced psoriasis was defined as an incident diagnosis of psoriasis after starting a TNFi. Patients with personal histories of psoriasis prior to TNFi therapy were excluded. Following diagnosis, responses to medication changes were defined based on physician assessments., Results: Nine of 166 (5.4%) patients on TNFi for JIA were diagnosed with TNFi-induced psoriasis. All cases were female. One had a family history of psoriasis. The median age was 10 (range 2-16) years. Five (55%) patients experienced scalp psoriasis, including four (44%) with alopecia. Two (22%) patients achieved significant improvement after switching to different classes of biologic agents, while three (33%) patients had significant improvement following discontinuation of biologic therapy. One of five patients who switched to a different TNFi had complete resolution, while four had worsening symptoms or partial improvement., Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of TNFi-induced psoriasis in JIA at two centers. Though larger studies are needed, our data suggest discontinuation of TNFi or biologic class switching should be considered as treatment strategies in select patients., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background and Aim: Although previous studies compared the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) versus adalimumab (ADA) as the first-line biologics for Crohn's disease (CD), the difference in long-term prognosis based on which biologic was used first has scarcely been reported. In particular, the clinical courses after loss of response (LOR) of the first-line biologics are largely unknown., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed. Disease courses of biologic-naïve CD patients who were started on IFX or ADA treatment were evaluated, even after LOR of the initial biologics., Results: In total, 263 CD patients were eligible for analysis, 183 were treated with IFX first, and 80 were treated with ADA first. The median observation period was 64.2 months. The cumulative steroid-free remission rates and surgery-free rates did not differ significantly between the patients treated with IFX first and those treated with ADA first (log-rank test P = 0.42 and P = 0.74, respectively). In addition, no significant difference was observed in the rate of occurrence of events associated with ineffectiveness (modification of anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment including intensification, switch, discontinuation, or surgery) between the patient groups (log-rank test P = 0.62). The patients treated with IFX first were likely to discontinue the agent due to adverse events, whereas those treated with ADA first were likely to discontinue due to treatment failure or LOR., Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in the long-term prognosis between biologic-naïve patients with CD who were started treatment with IFX first and ADA first., (© 2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents are important for managing refractory intestinal Behçet's disease. Few studies have reported the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease due to its rarity., Aims: The aim was to examine the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world practice., Methods: This was a retrospective review of medical records at 4 hospitals in Japan. Global gastrointestinal symptom and endoscopic assessment scores were analyzed in intestinal Behçet's disease patients given anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents at 3 and 12 months after the start of therapy., Results: Of 53 intestinal Behçet's disease patients, 22 received anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody treatment. At the first line, 14 were given adalimumab, and 8 were given infliximab. After 3 and 12 months of treatment, 7 and 11 patients showed complete response of gastrointestinal symptom scores, respectively, and 5 and 9 showed complete remission of the endoscopic assessment score, respectively. Three patients switched anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents., Conclusion: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies are effective for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world situations. Switching anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents may be useful for failure of first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in some refractory cases., (Copyright © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infliximab and adalimumab are widely used in the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). There are few published data on the treatment persistence of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with UC., Methods: We aimed to compare the treatment persistence rates of infliximab versus adalimumab as first- and second-line tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF), to identify factors potentially associated with persistence, and to evaluate reasons for withdrawal in UC patients. We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of UC patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab for at least 6 months between June 2002 and May 2018., Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of follow-up was 5.4 (3.2-8.3) years. For first-line anti-TNF agent, data on 160 patients with UC were analyzed. The mean (SD) duration of persistence was 3.4 (3.5) years and 2.1 (2.0) years in the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, respectively (P = 0.24). Concomitant use of 5-aminosalicylate was associated with higher persistence of first-line anti-TNF treatment in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; P = 0.002). For second-line anti-TNF agent, data on 43 patients were analyzed. The mean (SD) duration of persistence was 2.0 (1.7) years and 3.2 (3.1) years in the infliximab and adalimumab subgroups, respectively (P = 0.95). No factors were associated with persistence of second-line anti-TNF treatment., Conclusions: Infliximab and adalimumab showed similar levels of persistence as first- and second-line anti-TNF treatments. Concomitant use of 5-aminosalicylates was associated with higher persistence of first-line anti-TNF treatment., (© 2018 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Anti-TNF agents are effective to treat perianal Crohn's disease (CD). Evidence suggests that Crohn's disease patients with perianal fistulas need higher infliximab (IFX) serum concentrations compared to patients without perianal CD to achieve complete disease control. Our aim was to compare anti-TNF serum concentrations between patients with actively draining and closed perianal fistulas. Methods: A retrospective survey was performed in CD patients with perianal disease treated with IFX or adalimumab (ADL). Fistula closure was defined as absence of active drainage at gentle finger compression and/or fistula healing on magnetic resonance imaging. Results: We identified 66 CD patients with a history of perianal fistulas treated with IFX ( n  = 47) and ADL ( n  = 19). Median IFX serum trough concentrations ([interquartile range]) were higher in patients with closed fistulas ( n  = 32) compared to patients with actively draining fistulas ( n  = 15): 6.0 µg/ml [5.4-6.9] versus 2.3 µg/ml [1.1-4.0], respectively ( p  < .001)). A similar difference was seen in patients treated with ADL: median serum concentrations were 7.4 µg/ml [6.5-10.8] in 13 patients with closed fistulas versus 4.8 µg/ml [1.7-6.2] in 6 patients with producing fistulas ( p  = .003). Serum concentrations of ≥5.0 µg/ml for IFX (area under the curve of 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82-1.00)) and 5.9 µg/ml for ADL (area under the curve of 0.89; 95% CI 0.71-1.00) were associated with fistula closure. Conclusion: Cut-off serum concentrations ≥5.0 µg/ml for IFX and ≥5.9 µg/ml for ADL were associated with perianal fistula closure. Hence, patients with producing perianal fistulas may benefit from anti-TNF dose intensification to achieve fistula closure.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is now recommended in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, assay types and drug concentration thresholds are still debated., Aim: To correlate inflammatory bowel disease activity in a New Zealand cohort with trough concentrations of infliximab and adalimumab, and ADA using locally developed competitive-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to establish threshold concentrations., Methods: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) from Christchurch and Dunedin on anti-TNF drugs >12 weeks were enrolled. Trough blood samples were assayed for drug and ADA concentrations. Other data included quality of life, blood count, C-reactive protein, albumin, renal function and disease activity indices., Results: Of 103 patients, 53 were on infliximab (36 CD, 15 UC and 2 unclassified) and 50 adalimumab (48 CD and 2 UC). Median (range) infliximab and adalimumab concentrations were 10.5 (0-41) and 9.61 mg/L (0-30). CD remission, Crohn Disease Activity Index <150, correlated with infliximab and adalimumab concentration in CD (infliximab, P = 0.03; adalimumab, P = 0.04), with too few UC patients for analysis. Receiver operator curve analysis suggested a threshold value of 5.1 mg/L for distinguishing active disease from remission for infliximab and 7.3 mg/L for adalimumab in CD. Of 13 patients with infliximab <2 mg/L, 10 were ADA positive by homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA), including five with neutralising antibodies using ELISA. Of six with adalimumab <2 mg/L, three were ADA positive using HMSA, including one with neutralising antibodies., Conclusion: Using the New Zealand ELISA assay, threshold concentrations of 5 mg/L for infliximab and 7 mg/L for adalimumab are suggested to aid dosing decisions, consistent with results internationally. Both neutralising (ELISA) and non-neutralising ADA (HMSA) are associated with low drug concentrations., (© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin disease that presents a therapeutic challenge. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors have been reported to successfully control PG. Our aim was to systematically evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of TNFα inhibitors in adults with PG. A literature search including databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted, using search terms related to PG and TNFα inhibitors. Studies and case reports were included if patients were diagnosed with PG, over the age of 18 and administered TNFα inhibitor. A total of 3212 unique citations were identified resulting in 222 articles describing 356 patients being included in our study. The study we report found an 87% (95% CI: 83%-90%) response rate and a 67% (95% CI: 62%-72%) complete response rate to TNFα inhibitors. No statistically significant differences in the response rates (P = 0.6159) or complete response rates (P = 0.0773) to infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept were found. In our study TNFα inhibitors demonstrated significant effectiveness with response and complete response rates supporting the use of TNFα inhibitors to treat PG in adults. Our study suggests that there is no significant difference in effectiveness among infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept., (© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: (a) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-TNF trough levels to predict mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); (b) to determine the best cut-off point to predict mucosal healing in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF., Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective study. IBD patients under anti-TNF treatment for at least 6 months that had to undergo an endoscopy were included. Mucosal healing was defined as: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease < 3 for Crohn's disease (CD), Rutgeerts score < i2 for CD in postoperative setting, or Mayo endoscopic score ≤ 1 for ulcerative colitis (UC). Anti-TNF concentrations were measured using SMART ELISAs at trough., Results: A total of 182 patients were included. Anti-TNF trough levels were significantly higher among patients that had mucosal healing than among those who did not. The area under the curve of infliximab for mucosal healing was 0.63 (best cutoff value 3.4 μg/mL), and for adalimumab 0.60 (best cutoff value 7.2 μg/mL). In the multivariate analysis, having anti-TNF drug levels above the cutoff values [odds ratio (OR) 3.1]) and having UC instead of CD (OR 4) were associated with a higher probability of having mucosal healing. Additionally, the need for an escalated dosage (OR 0.2) and current smoking habit (OR 0.2) were also associated with a lower probability of mucosal healing., Conclusions: There was an association between anti-TNF trough levels and mucosal healing in IBD patients; however, the accuracy of the determination of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations able to predict mucosal healing was suboptimal.

Background: In Japan, more than five years have passed since emergence of the first three biologics, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, became available in daily practice; however, no data for drug survival was reported from Japan., Objective: To study the long-term drug survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab used for Japanese psoriatic patients., Methods: We retrieved data on all patients treated with biological agents and calculated the long-term drug survival for infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab using our psoriasis registry (Kurume Psoriasis Registry: KURUPR) consisted of 343 patients by the end of March 2017. We analyzed 103 treatment courses of 83 patients with all types of psoriasis, as well as 79 treatment courses of 62 patients with psoriasis vulgaris using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Drug survival was higher for ustekinumab than infliximab and adalimumab in both settings, although there were no statistical differences., Conclusions: Previous studies of long-term drug survival in patients with psoriasis vulgaris showed significantly higher drug survival for ustekinumab than infliximab, and adalimumab. Our data showed similar tendency. Besides randomized clinical trials, drug survival data is useful because it reflects real-world management.

The aim of the present study was to compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Additional aims are as follows: (i) to identify any difference in the causes of treatment discontinuation between patients treated with ADA and IFX; (ii) to assess any impact of demographic features, concomitant treatments, and different lines of biologic therapy on ADA and IFX retention rates; and (iii) to identify any correlation between ADA and IFX treatment duration and the age at uveitis onset, the age at onset of the associated systemic diseases, and the age at the start of treatment. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic data from patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis treated with ADA or IFX were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to assess survival curves. One hundred eight patients (188 eyes) were enrolled; in 87 (80.6%) patients, uveitis was associated with a systemic disease. ADA and IFX were administered in 62 and 46 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates (p value = 0.22). Similarly, no differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates in relation to gender (p value = 0.61 for males, p value = 0.09 for females), monotherapy (p value = 0.08), combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (log-rank p value = 0.63), and different lines of biologic therapy (p value = 0.79 for biologic-naïve patients; p value = 0.81 for subjects previously treated with other biologics). In conclusion, ADA and IFX have similar long-term retention rates in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features do not affect their long-term effectiveness.

By monitoring serum concentrations of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) and levels of their antibodies in patients with inflammatory diseases, clinicians can adjust dose and increase safety and effectiveness of treatment. The aim was to develop and validate in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for IFX and ADL, together with anti-IFX and anti-ADL ELISAs for routine detection and further analysis with acid dissociation of immune complexes. Furthermore, the objectives were to compare in-house assays with commercial ELISAs and reporter gene assays (RGAs) and to determine cross-reactivity between original Remicade®/Remsima™ and their antibodies. In-house ELISAs were validated (imprecision, accuracy among other criteria) and compared with commercial apDia ELISAs and RGAs. Correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, agreement, and bias were calculated. All in-house ELISAs gave precise and repeatable results. The immune complexes between IFX and anti-IFX were found in 3% of samples, while complexes between ADL and anti-ADL were found in 14% of samples. Significant correlations were found between in-house and apDia ELISAs and RGA for IFX, ADL, anti-IFX, and anti-ADL results. Remicade®, Remsima™, and their antibodies could be accurately measured with either apDia or in-house IFX and anti-IFX ELISAs. Accurate and precise in-house ELISAs, highly comparable with commercial ELISAs and RGAs, were developed and validated for routine analysis of samples of patients treated with IFX (Remicade® or Remsima™) or ADL providing substantial cost benefit. Complex dissociation identified samples with anti-IFX-IFX (3%) and anti-ADL-ADL (14%) complexes indicating the benefit of adding acid dissociation to therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX and ADL.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease associated with reduced quality of life and substantial costs. It is unclear which tests and assessment tools allow the best assessment of prognosis in people with early RA and whether or not variables predict the response of patients to different drug treatments., Objective: To systematically review evidence on the use of selected tests and assessment tools in patients with early RA (1) in the evaluation of a prognosis (review 1) and (2) as predictive markers of treatment response (review 2)., Data Sources: Electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science Conference Proceedings; searched to September 2016), registers, key websites, hand-searching of reference lists of included studies and key systematic reviews and contact with experts., Study Selection: Review 1 - primary studies on the development, external validation and impact of clinical prediction models for selected outcomes in adult early RA patients. Review 2 - primary studies on the interaction between selected baseline covariates and treatment (conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) on salient outcomes in adult early RA patients., Results: Review 1 - 22 model development studies and one combined model development/external validation study reporting 39 clinical prediction models were included. Five external validation studies evaluating eight clinical prediction models for radiographic joint damage were also included. c -statistics from internal validation ranged from 0.63 to 0.87 for radiographic progression (different definitions, six studies) and 0.78 to 0.82 for the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Predictive performance in external validations varied considerably. Three models [(1) Active controlled Study of Patients receiving Infliximab for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis of Early onset (ASPIRE) C-reactive protein (ASPIRE CRP), (2) ASPIRE erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASPIRE ESR) and (3) Behandelings Strategie (BeSt)] were externally validated using the same outcome definition in more than one population. Results of the random-effects meta-analysis suggested substantial uncertainty in the expected predictive performance of models in a new sample of patients. Review 2 - 12 studies were identified. Covariates examined included anti-citrullinated protein/peptide anti-body (ACPA) status, smoking status, erosions, rheumatoid factor status, C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, swollen joint count (SJC), body mass index and vascularity of synovium on power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Outcomes examined included erosions/radiographic progression, disease activity, physical function and Disease Activity Score-28 remission. There was statistical evidence to suggest that ACPA status, SJC and PDUS status at baseline may be treatment effect modifiers, but not necessarily that they are prognostic of response for all treatments. Most of the results were subject to considerable uncertainty and were not statistically significant., Limitations: The meta-analysis in review 1 was limited by the availability of only a small number of external validation studies. Studies rarely investigated the interaction between predictors and treatment., Suggested Research Priorities: Collaborative research (including the use of individual participant data) is needed to further develop and externally validate the clinical prediction models. The clinical prediction models should be validated with respect to individual treatments. Future assessments of treatment by covariate interactions should follow good statistical practice., Conclusions: Review 1 - uncertainty remains over the optimal prediction model(s) for use in clinical practice. Review 2 - in general, there was insufficient evidence that the effect of treatment depended on baseline characteristics., Study Registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042402., Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme., Competing Interests: John Stevens is a shareholder of GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK House, Middlesex, UK), AstraZeneca plc (Cambridge, UK) and Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc (Shire plc, Dublin, Republic of Ireland).

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in refractory sight-threatening retinal vasculitis (RV) during a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary aims were to evaluate (i) any impact of concomitant conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and different lines of biologic therapy; (ii) any difference in terms of efficacy between ADA and IFX; (iii) consequences of biotherapies on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); (iv) corticosteroid-sparing effect; and (vi) ocular complications during anti-TNF-α treatment. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were retrospectively collected from the medical records and statistically analyzed. Forty-eight patients (82 eyes) were recruited, 22 (45.8%) of which received IFX and 26 (54.2%) ADA. The percentages of patients achieving RV remission within 3 and 12 months were 54 and 86%, respectively. A significant decrease in RV detection was identified from baseline to 3-month (p < 0.0001) and 12-month (p < 0.0001) assessments and between 3-month and 12-month visits (p = 0.004). No differences were identified in terms of RV resolution between (i) patients undergoing monotherapy and those co-administered with cDMARDs at 3-month (p = 0.560) and 12-month (p = 0.611) follow-up; (ii) biologic-naïve patients and those already exposed to other biologics at 3-month (p = 0.497) and 12-month (p > 0.99) visits; and (iii) patients treated with ADA and those treated with IFX (p = 0.357). During the study period, a statistically significant corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p = 0.0002), while BCVA values did not significantly change (p = 0.950). Anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies have proved excellent results in patients with recalcitrant sight-threatening RV.

Background: Interactions between thiopurines and infliximab presumably contribute to superior effect of infliximab-thiopurine combination therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined whether principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites influence adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies (Abs)., Methods: Ninety-eight IBD patients previously treated with infliximab (96%) in whom trough ADL and anti-ADL Abs had been assessed as part of their clinical care were included. Thiopurine metabolites [6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and methylated mercaptopurine metabolites (6-MeMP)] were determined at similar time points., Results: ADL-thiopurine combination therapy was not associated with reduced anti-ADL Ab positivity compared to ADL monotherapy: 8/31 (26%) versus 19/67 (28%), p = 1.00. Concentrations of thiopurine metabolites were similar in anti-ADL Ab-positive and negative patients (6-TGN median 109 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC vs. 112, p = 0.80; 6-MeMP 448 RBC vs. 720, p = 0.94). ADL trough levels did not differ between anti-ADL Ab-negative patients on ADL-thiopurine combination therapy and those on monotherapy (9.5 μg/mL vs. 7.6, p = 0.31). ADL levels were also comparable between patients on ADL mono- and combination therapy after stratification for 6-TGN/6-MeMP quartiles. There were no correlations between levels of 6-TGN and ADL (r P  = - 0.17, p = 0.45; r S  = - 0.38, p = 0.08), or 6-MeMP and ADL (r P  = - 0.23, p = 0.31; r S  = - 0.35, p = 0.11). Anti-ADL Ab positivity was associated with ADL treatment failure (OR 6 [2-20], p < 0.01). Higher trough ADL (9.6 μg/mL vs. 7.3, p < 0.05), but not concomitant thiopurine treatment, metabolite levels, or dosage, was associated with clinical remission., Conclusion: Effectiveness of ADL therapy associated with circulating ADL levels and anti-ADL Ab formation. In this study, there appeared no direct interactions between thiopurine metabolites and ADL or anti-ADL Abs.

We examined the assay formats used to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in clinical studies of the anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies adalimumab and infliximab in chronic inflammatory disease and their potential impact on pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes. Using findings of a recent systematic literature review of the immunogenicity of 11 biological/biosimilar agents, we conducted an ancillary qualitative review of a subset of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of the monoclonal antibodies against anti-TNF factor adalimumab and infliximab. Among studies of adalimumab and infliximab, the immunoassay method used to detect antibodies was reported in 91 of 111 (82%) and 154 of 206 (75%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. In most adalimumab and infliximab studies, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay was used [85 of 91 (93%) and 134 of 154 (87%), respectively]. ADA incidence varied widely among assays and inflammatory diseases (adalimumab, 0-87%; infliximab, 0-79%). Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes were only reported for ADA-positive patients in 38 of 91 (42%) and 61 of 154 (40%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. Regardless of assay format or biological used, ADA formation was associated with lower serum concentrations, reduced efficacy and elevated rates of infusion-related reactions. Consistent with previous recommendations to improve interpretation of immunogenicity data for biologicals, greater consistency in reporting of assay methods and clinical consequences of ADA formation may prove useful. Additional standardization in immunogenicity testing and reporting, application of modern, robust assays that satisfy current regulatory expectations and implementation of international standards for marketed products may help to improve our understanding of the impact of immunogenicity to biologics., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Immunology.)

Background: Direct head-to-head studies comparing the long-term outcomes of infliximab (IFX) to adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease (CD) are sparse., Aims: We compared the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in CD., Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study including biologic-naïve adult patients with CD who were started on IFX or ADA at the McGill University Health Center. The primary end points were clinical response and remission at 12 months. Secondary end points included corticosteroid-free remission at 12 months, durable remission, and treatment failure with need for steroids, hospitalization or surgery. Safety was also assessed., Results: Two hundred and twenty patients were included (143 IFX, 77 ADA). Patients on IFX had a higher prevalence of fistulizing or perianal disease and corticosteroid treatment at baseline. Rates of clinical remission and corticosteroid-free remission at 12 months were similar between both groups: 63.8 versus 76.3% (p = 0.139) and 54.1 versus 44.7% (p = 0.354), respectively, for IFX and ADA. Combination therapy led to significantly higher remission rates at 12 months compared to monotherapy for patients on IFX (81.2 vs. 52.1%, p = 0.008), but not for those on ADA. Higher rates of adverse events were reported with IFX compared to ADA (p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Our real-life experience in biologic-naïve CD patients demonstrated that patients started on IFX were more likely to have a harder-to-treat phenotype. Despite that, efficacy end points were similar between both groups. Clinical remission was higher in patients with combination therapy for IFX, but not for those on ADA. This warrants further investigation.

Background: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a useful tool in the management of patients with loss of response to biological therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease., Aims: To evaluate whether early, post-induction anti-tumor necrosis factor trough levels and the presence of different types of anti-drug antibodies may impact long-term clinical remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease., Methods: We prospectively assessed anti-tumor necrosis factor trough levels and both persistent and transient anti-drug antibodies. The Harvey-Bradshaw Index and the partial Mayo score were evaluated at each visit or in case of relapse., Results: At week 14, median infliximab trough levels were significantly lower in patients who experienced loss of response at week 48 as compared to patients in stable remission (1.3mcg/mL [range 0-10.2mcg/mL] vs. 10.1mcg/mL[range 0-42.8mcg/mL], P<0.0004). ROC curve identified an infliximab trough levels of 6.2mcg/mL as the cut-off value with the highest accuracy (c-index=0.864) for loss of response at week 48. At week 14 we observed a correlation between anti-drug antibodies concentration and infliximab trough levels (r s =-0.513, P=0.04)., Conclusions: The results highlight the usefulness of assessing early biological TL in order to predict patients' long-term outcome., (Copyright © 2017 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to report the clinical outcome of children with uveitis treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents., Methods: This included a retrospective cohort study. Children with uveitis treated with infliximab or adalimumab in 2008-2014 at five dedicated uveitis clinics were identified by database search. Their medical records were reviewed for demographic data, clinical presentation, ocular complications, and visual outcome. Systemic side effects and the steroid-sparing effect of treatment were documented., Results: The cohort included 24 patients (43 eyes) of whom 14 received infliximab and 10 received adalimumab after failing conventional immunosuppression therapy. Mean age was 9.3 ± 4.0 years. The most common diagnosis was juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related uveitis (n = 10), followed by Behçet's disease (n = 4), sarcoidosis (n = 1), and ankylosing spondylitis (n = 1); eight had idiopathic uveitis. Ocular manifestations included panuveitis in 20 eyes (46.5%), chronic anterior uveitis in 19 (44.2%), and intermediate uveitis in 4 (9.3%). The duration of biologic treatment ranged from 6 to 72 months. During the 12 months prior to biologic treatment, while on conventional immunosuppressive therapy, mean visual acuity deteriorated from 0.22 to 0.45 logMAR, with a trend of recovery to 0.25 at 3 months after initiation of biologic treatment, remaining stable thereafter. A full corticosteroid-sparing effect was demonstrated in 16 of the 19 patients (84.2%) for whom data were available. Treatment was well tolerated., Conclusions: Treatment of pediatric uveitis with anti-TNF-α agents may improve outcome while providing steroid-sparing effect, when conventional immunosuppression fails. The role of anti-TNF-α agents as first-line treatment should be further investigated in controlled prospective clinical trials.