Search

Objective To perform gene expression profiles comparison so that to identify and understand the potential differences in pathogenesis between the pandemic and seasonal A (H1N1) influenza viruses. Methods A549 cells were infected with A/California/07/09 (H1N1) and A/GuangdongBaoan/51/08 (H1N1) respectively at the same MOI of 2 and collected at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h post infection (p.i.). Gene expression profiles of A549 cells were obtained using the 22 K Human Genome Oligo Array, and differentially expressed genes were analyzed at selected time points. Results Microarrays results indicated that both of the viruses suppressed host immune response related pathways including cytokine production while pandemic H1N1 virus displayed weaker suppression of host immune response than seasonal H1N1 virus. Observation on similar anti-apoptotic events such as activation of apoptosis inhibitor and down-regulation of key genes of apoptosis pathways in both infections showed that activities of promoting apoptosis were different in later stage of infection. Conclusion The immuno-suppression and anti-apoptosis events of pandemic H1N1 virus were similar to those seen by seasonal H1N1 virus. The pandemic H1N1 virus had an ability to inhibit biological pathways associated with cytokine responses, NK activation and macrophage recognition .

Influenza is a contagious, acute respiratory disease caused by influenza viruses and has caused substantial human morbidity and mortality over the past century (24, 27). The 1918-1919 pandemic caused by influenza virus type A H1N1 was responsible for an estimated 50 million deaths (21). In recent years, novel subtype influenza viruses, such as H5N1 and the 2009 pandemic H1N1, have been transmitted directly from animals to the human population. These infections were characterized by unusually high rates of severe respiratory disease and mortality among young patients (8, 18). Various genetic shifts have occurred in these viruses, allowing them to evade the host protective effects of specific antihemagglutinin (HA) or antineuraminidase (NA) antibodies (27). Therefore, host innate immunity in the early phase of infection, which includes a variety of pattern recognition molecules, inflammatory cytokines, and immune cells, such as macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells, plays a critical role in host defense. NK cells are bone marrow-derived, large, granular lymphocytes and are key effector cells in innate immunity for host defense against invading infectious pathogens and malignant transformation through cytolytic activity and production of cytokines, such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (10, 28, 43, 51). In humans, NK cells account for approximately 10% of all blood lymphocytes and are identified by their expression of the CD56 surface antigen and their lack of CD3. Two distinct subsets of human NK cells have been defined according to the cell surface density of CD56 expression (10). The majority (∼90% in blood) of human NK cells are CD56dim, and a minor population (∼10% in blood) is CD56bright. These NK subsets are functionally distinct, with the immunoregulatory CD56bright cells producing abundant cytokines and the cytotoxic CD56dim cells probably functioning as efficient effectors of natural and antibody-dependent target cell lysis (11). Many lines of evidence suggest that NK cells can be functionally activated by the interaction between natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) on the cell surface and influenza virus HA protein or stress-induced proteins from infected cells (2, 13, 33, 44, 46). On the other hand, influenza virus is able to evade host immunity by infecting NK cells and triggering cell apoptosis or by attenuating NK cell lysis of H3N2-infected cells, owing to alterations in HA binding properties (35, 39). The infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes into the lung and strong inflammatory responses were detected in H5N1 and the 1918 and 2009 pandemic H1N1 infections. Nevertheless, little is known about the precise roles of NK cells in these infections. In this study, the responses of NK cells to 1918 H1N1, 2009 H1N1, and H5N1 influenza A viruses were evaluated using three strains of influenza A virus pseudotyped particles (pps). Our findings may aid in understanding the pathogenicity of influenza viruses and its correlation with clinical severity.