Search

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Hematology. The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations on the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors. After an introduction on the clinical background and relevance of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitor testing, the following aspects of laboratory testing are included: screening for inhibitors, assay principle, sample requirements, testing requirements and interpretation, quality assurance, interferences and recent developments. This guidance document focusses on recommendations for a standardised procedure for the laboratory measurement of FVIII and FIX type I inhibitors. The recommendations are based on published data in peer‐reviewed literature and expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Emicizumab is a recombinant, humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics the function of factor VIII (FVIII) which results in a significant reduction in the annualized bleeding rate in patients with haemophilia A (HA), however, the degree with which emicizumab corrects the coagulation defect remains unclear. The objective of this study was to predict the approximate FVIII level in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors on emicizumab using global haemostasis assays. Materials and methods: Patients with moderate and mild HA in the non‐bleeding state and healthy controls had FVIII levels and thrombin generation assessed. Linear regression was utilized to model the FVIII levels as a function of the thrombin generation assay parameters and to make a calibration curve of FVIII levels versus peak thrombin and endogenous thrombin potential. Patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors on emicizumab had thrombin generation performed in the same manner and their peak thrombin and endogenous thrombin potential results were placed on the calibration curve to calculate their FVIII Equivalency of Emicizumab by Thrombin Generation (F8EmT). Results: All patients with severe HA with inhibitors on emicizumab had F8EmT >10%, suggesting they had been converted to a mild haemophilia phenotype. The patient's weight was inversely correlated to their F8EmT. Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that the F8EmT in patients with severe HA on emicizumab falls within the range of mild haemophilia which is consistent with the data noted in the emicizumab clinical trials and in vivo studies in animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Emicizumab is a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody licensed for patients with severe haemophilia A with and without inhibitors. Management of breakthrough bleeding in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab involves episodic treatment with bypassing agents (BPA), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Thrombotic events and thrombotic microangiopathy were reported when patients on emicizumab received concomitant aPCC at relatively high doses yet such events were not reported with rFVIIa. We studied the effect of spiking various concentrations of BPA on plasma taken from patients on emicizumab. Material and Methods: Eleven patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors who are on emicizumab were recruited to participate. Blood samples drawn from patients were spiked in vitro with varying concentrations of aPCC and rFVIIa. All samples were tested utilizing global haemostasis assays, thromboelastography and thrombin generation assay. Results: Thrombin generation increased with higher concentrations of spiked BPA with a normalized endogenous thrombin potential at a concentration of 0.05 IU/ml and 4 mcg/ml for aPCC and rFVIIa, respectively. Concentrations of aPCC in the range of licensed dosing led to excessive thrombin generation. Thromboelastography was not sufficiently sensitive. Conclusion: Due to the known thrombotic complications when emicizumab is used in conjunction with aPCC, there has been a large‐scale abandonment of the use of aPCC in patients on emicizumab. However, it is possible that aPCC can be used safely with emicizumab albeit with lower doses than are typically prescribed. It would be important to test this hypothesis in a clinical study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) with factor (F)VIII inhibitors, including children, have impaired health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). The HAVEN 2 study (NCT027955767) of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors demonstrated that subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in low annualizedbleed rates. Aim: We assessed the impact of emicizumab prophylaxis on the HRQoL of children and their caregivers participating in HAVEN 2. Methods: Children aged 8‐11 years self‐reported HRQoL using the Haemophilia‐Specific Quality of Life Assessment Instrument for Children and Adolescents Short Form (Haemo‐QoL SF II). Caregivers of children aged 0‐11 years completed the Adapted Inhibitor‐Specific Quality of Life Assessment with Aspects of Caregiver Burden. All scores were transformed to a 0‐100 scale, where lower scores reflect a better HRQoL. The number of missed days from school/day care and hospitalizations was also recorded. Results: In HAVEN 2 (n = 88), the median age was 6.5 years (range: 1‐15 years); 85 participants were aged < 12 years and included in this analysis, and 34 participants were aged 8‐11 years, thereby eligible to complete the Haemo‐QoL SF II questionnaire. The mean (standard deviation, n) baseline Haemo‐QoL SF II 'Total' score was 30.2 (14.9, 30), indicating moderate impairment; with emicizumab, mean score decreased by −9.62 (7.73, 17) points to 23.0 (13.93, 20) by Week 49. The most improved domains were 'Sports & School' and 'Physical Health'. Caregivers reported similar improvements. Conclusion: Prophylactic emicizumab is accompanied by substantial and sustained improvements in HRQoL of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors and their caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Haemophilia is a serious inherited bleeding disorder resulting from a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (haemophilia A) or coagulation factor IX (haemophilia B). While effective therapies have been developed to replace the missing factor and restore normal coagulation, they can lead to the development of neutralizing anti‐drug antibodies, termed inhibitors, which significantly worsen morbidity and quality of life. While advancements have been made to improve the management of patients, and particularly for this review, children with inhibitors, there remain significant unmet needs including inhibitor prevention, inhibitor eradication and, when those fail, more effective bleed prevention and a reduction in the treatment burden. This review will discuss current treatment options including the recently licensed bispecific antibody, emicizumab, and provide insights into how I treat children with inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates represents a significant treatment complication for hemophilia. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy eradicates inhibitors in 60–80% of patients, resulting in a normal FVIII response. This article, based on presentations at the 6th International Coagulation Meeting, held in Barcelona, Spain, in September 2017, provides an overview of management approaches for patients with inhibitors and briefly tabulates four cases of ITI therapy (first-line or rescue ITI therapy in pediatric and adult patients) with successful outcomes. Switching FVIII product from recombinant FVIII to plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate may be helpful in eradicating inhibitors. The rate of decline of inhibitor titer in the initial stages of ITI therapy is a good indicator of the success or failure of therapy, although prognostic biomarkers are needed. The development of the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab, which was recently shown to reduce bleeding in inhibitor patients, offers a potential alternative therapeutic option. However, the benefits of inhibitor eradication, including a wider choice of cheaper therapeutic products for preventing and treating bleeds, suggest that at least one attempt of ITI therapy should be offered to patients who develop inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Hemophilia patients with inhibitors have frequent bleeding episodes and often develop hemophilic arthropathy which is in contradistinction to non-inhibitor patients for whom prophylaxis prevents joint disease. Recently, two prospective trials have demonstrated that secondary prophylaxis with bypassing agents in inhibitor patients offers benefit by reducing bleeding episodes. This report describes the clinical experience of secondary prophylaxis in a large population of inhibitor patients. Patients/Methods: This retrospective, observational study was performed by abstracting data from medical records of patients in whom secondary prophylaxis with rFVIIa was prescribed. Data were collected by professional medical record abstractors and included patient demographics, dosing regimens, bleeding events, and healthcare resource utilization. Data analysis was descriptive and included sensitivity analyses. Results: Data from 86 patients from 14 countries were collected. The primary outcome measure (% reduction in bleeding) was 46% (95% CI, -54.0 to −38.2) in patients with at least one bleeding episodes prior to starting prophylaxis and 52% (95% CI, -60.7 to −43.3) in patients with at least one bleeding episode per month prior to starting prophylaxis. A variety of subanalyses were performed, including among age and bleed location; the results for pediatric patients, adults, target and non-target joint bleeds categorizations were similar to the overall primary outcome. Conclusions: The results in this large observational study are similar to those from the previously reported prospective study of prophylaxis with rFVIIa in inhibitor positive patients, although this study represents a more typical inhibitor population who utilized prophylaxis in the clinical setting. As such, prophylaxis should be considered a potentially effective therapy in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

. Haemostasis management in people with haemophilia can present a range of challenges to physicians. Specific challenges that may be encountered relate to regimens for immune tolerance induction, use of central venous access devices, optimizing care of paediatric patients with inhibitors and improving outcomes in acquired haemophilia. There are also challenges related to performing surgery, and the establishment of specialist centres is valuable with regard to this. These challenges are considered in the light of available data, and with perspectives gained from the experience of experts treating patients around the world. Sharing this knowledge may help to improve patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most serious current complication of factor replacement therapy for hemophilia patients is the development of neutralizing antibodies to the factor termed inhibitors. Patients with high-titer inhibitors frequently develop serious bleeding complications which do not respond to standard factor replacement therapy. Therefore, they must be treated with the so-called bypassing agents, recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates, neither of which is as effective as standard factor replacement in patients without inhibitors. Immune tolerance therapy aimed at eradicating inhibitors is successful in a majority of patients; however, a sizable minority will have life-long inhibitors and often develop debilitating joint disease. The ultimate goal is to develop strategies aimed at preventing inhibitor development though these have not been realized yet. Until this is achieved, additional novel approaches are needed to improve the treatment of bleeding episodes and to better treat arthropathy once it develops. Finally, there is no laboratory monitoring device which can predict the clinical response of patients to bypassing agents. Thus another goal of current research is to develop such a tool which will enable the individualization of bypassing agent. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]