Search

Treatment of [Ti(O-i-Pr)(2)Cl(2)] with NaL(OEt) (L(OEt)(-) = [CpCo[P(O)(OEt)(2)](3)](-), Cp = eta(5)-C(5)H(5)) afforded [L(OEt)Ti(O-i-Pr)(2)Cl] that reacted with HCl in ether to give [L(OEt)TiCl(3)] (1). The average Ti-O and Ti-Cl distances in 1 are 1.975 and 2.293 A, respectively. Reaction of titanyl sulfate with NaL(OEt) in water followed by addition of HBF(4) afforded [L(OEt)TiF(3)] (2), the Ti-O and Ti-F distances of which are 2.020(2) and 1.792(2) A, respectively. The Zr(IV) analogue [L(OEt)ZrF(3)] (3) was prepared similarly from zirconyl nitrate, NaL(Oet), and HBF(4) in water. The Zr-O and average Zr-F distances in 3 are 2.139(2) and 1.938(2) A, respectively. Treatment of 1 with tetrachlorocatechol (H(2)Cl(4)cat) afforded [L(OEt)Ti(Cl(4)cat)Cl] (4). The average Ti-O(P), Ti-O(C), and Ti-Cl distances in 4 are 1.972, 1.926, and 2.334 A, respectively. Hydrolysis of 4 in the presence of Et(3)N yielded the mu-oxo dimer [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(Cl(4)cat)(2)(mu-O)] (5). The average Ti-O(P), Ti-O(C), and Ti-O(Ti) distances in 5 are 2.027, 1.926, and 1.7977(9) A. Treatment of 1 with 1,1'-binaphthol (BINOLH(2)) in the presence of Et(3)N afforded [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(mu-O)(2)(mu-BINOL)] x 2BINOLH(2) (6.2BINOLH(2)). Complex 1 is capable of catalyzing ring opening of epoxides with Me(3)SiN(3) under solvent-free conditions presumably via a Ti-azide intermediate.

Treatment of [Ru(CO)2Cl2]x with NaLOEt (LOEt−=[Co(η5-C5H5){P(O)(OEt)2}3]−) afforded [LOEtRu(CO)2Cl] (1), which reacted with AgBF4 in acetone–H2O to give [LOEtRu(CO)2(H2O)][BF4] (2). Reaction of [LOEtRu(CHCHPh)(CO)(PPh3)] with HCl gave [LOEtRuCl(CO)(PPh3)] (3), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The RuC, RuP, RuCl and average RuO distances in 3 are 1.993(7), 2.2811(13), 2.376(2) and 2.137 A, respectively. Interaction of [LOEtRu(PPh3)2Cl] with CS2 and PR3 in the presence of [NH4][PF6] afforded the ruthenium(II) phosphoniodithiocarboxylate species [LOEtRu(PPh3)(η2-S2CPR3)][PF6] (R=Ph (4) or cyclohexyl (5)). Oxidation of 4 with AgBF4 yielded the ruthenium(III) complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)(η2-S2CPPh3)][BF4][PF6] (6), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The RuP, average RuO and average RuS distances in 6 are 2.3978(10), 2.078 and 2.2910 A, respectively. The ruthenium(II) thiocarbonyl complex [LOEtRu(CS)Cl(PPh3)] (7) was prepared from NaLOEt and [Ru(CS)Cl2(PPh3)2]2. The RuCl, RuP, RuC and average RuO distances in 7 are 2.3681(10), 2.3043(9), 1.823(4), and 2.140 A, respectively. Treatment of 7 with AgBF4 in acetone–H2O afforded [LOEtRu(CS)(PPh3)(H2O)][BF4] (8). On the basis of the Ru(III/II) formal potential, CS was found to be a stronger π acid ligand than CO.

Reaction of NaLOEt (LOEt = (η5-C5H5)Co{P(O)(OEt)2}3) with Ru(PPh3)3Cl2, Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide), and Ru(PPh3)2(CO)Cl(CHCHPh) afforded LOEtRu(PPh3)2Cl (1), LOEtRu(DMSO)2Cl (2), and LOEtRu(PPh3)(CO)(CHCHPh) (3), respectively. The structures of complexes 1 and 2 have been established by X-ray crystallography. The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, and Ru−Cl bond distances in 1 are 2.183, 2.267, and 2.393(3) A, respectively. The mean Ru−O, Ru−S, and Ru−Cl distances in 2 are 2.118, 2.188, and 2.362(2) A, respectively. Treatment of 3 with HBF4 yielded the olefin complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)(CO)(η2-PhCHCH2)]BF4 (4). Reaction of complex 1 with PhC⋮CH in the presence of NH4PF6 gave the vinylidene complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)2(CCHPh)](PF6) (6). The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, and Ru−C distances in 6 are 2.127, 2.344, and 1.80(2) A, respectively. Deprotonation of 6 with NaOH gave the acetylide complex LOEtRu(PPh3)2(C⋮CPh) (7). Reaction of complex 1 with 3-butyn-1-ol in the presence of NH4PF6 afforded the cyclic carbene The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, a...

Interaction of LOEt(PPh3)2RuCl (LOEt = (η5-C5H5)Co{P(OEt)2O}3] with Me3SiC⋮CH and 2-phenyl-3-butyn-2-ol in the presence of NH4PF6 in MeOH/THF afforded the structurally characterized methoxycarbene ...

Treatment of titanyl sulfate in dilute sulfuric acid with 1 equiv of NaL(OEt) (L(OEt)(-) = [(eta(5)-C(5)H(5))Co{P(O)(OEt)(2)](3)](-)) in the presence of Na(3)PO(4) and Na(4)P(2)O(7) led to isolation of [(L(OEt)Ti)(3)(mu-O)(3)(mu(3-)PO(4))] (1) and [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-O)(mu-P(2)O(7))] (2), respectively. The structure of 1 consists of a Ti(3)O(3) core capped by a mu(3)-phosphato group. In 2, the [P(2)O(7)](4-) ligands binds to the two Ti's in a mu:eta(2),eta(2) fashion. Treatment of titanyl sulfate in dilute sulfuric acid with NaL(OEt) and 1.5 equiv of Na(2)Cr(2)O(7) gave [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-CrO(4))(3)] (3) that contains two L(OEt)Ti(3+) fragments bridged by three mu-CrO(4)(2-)-O,O' ligands. Complex 3 can act as a 6-electron oxidant and oxidize benzyl alcohol to give ca. 3 equiv of benzaldehyde. Treatment of [L(OEt)Ti(OTf)(3)] (OTf(-) = triflate) with [n-Bu(4)N][ReO(4)] afforded [[L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(2)](2)(mu-O)] (4). Treatment of [L(OEt)MF(3)] (M = Ti and Zr) with 3 equiv of [ReO(3)(OSiMe(3))] afforded [L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(3)] (5) and [L(OEt)Zr(ReO(4))(3)(H(2)O)] (6), respectively. Treatment of [L(OEt)MF(3)] with 2 equiv of [ReO(3)(OSiMe(3))] afforded [L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(2)F] (7) and [[L(OEt)Zr(ReO(4))(2)](2)(mu-F)(2)] (8), respectively, which reacted with Me(3)SiOTf to give [L(OEt)M(ReO(4))(2)(OTf)] (M = Ti (9), Zr (10)). Hydrolysis of [L(OEt)Zr(OTf)(3)] (11) with Na(2)WO(4).xH(2)O and wet CH(2)Cl(2) afforded the hydroxo-bridged complexes [[L(OEt)Zr(H(2)O)](3)(mu-OH)(3)(mu(3)-O)][OTf](4) (12) and [[L(OEt)Zr(H(2)O)(2)](2)(mu-OH)(2)][OTf](4) (13), respectively. The solid-state structures of 1-3, 6, and 11-13 have been established by X-ray crystallography. The L(OEt)Ti(IV) complexes can catalyze oxidation of methyl p-tolyl sulfide with tert-butyl hydroperoxide. The bimetallic Ti/ Re complexes 5 and 9 were found to be more active catalysts for the sulfide oxidation than other Ti(IV) complexes presumably because Re alkylperoxo species are involved as the reactive intermediates.

Interaction of PdCl(2)(MeCN)(2) with 2 equiv of (S(P))-(t)BuPhP(O)H (1H) followed by treatment with Et(3)N gave [Pd((1)(2)H)](2)(micro-Cl)(2) (2). Reaction of 2 with Na[S(2)CNEt(2)] or K[N(PPh(2)S)(2)] afforded Pd[(1)(2)H](S(2)CNEt(2)) (3) or Pd[(1)(2)H)[N(PPh(2)S)(2)] (4), respectively. Treatment of 3 with V(O)(acac)(2) (acac = acetylacetonate) and CuSO(4) in the presence of Et(3)N afforded bimetallic complexes V(O)[Pd(1)(2)(S(2)CNEt(2))](2) (5) or Cu[Pd(1)(2)(S(2)CNEt(2))](2) (6), respectively. X-ray crystallography established the S(P) configuration for the phosphinous acid ligands in 3 and 6, indicating that 1H binds to Pd(II) with retention of configuration at phosphorus. The geometry around Cu in 6 is approximately square planar with the average Cu-O distance of 1.915(3) A. Treatment of 2 with HBF(4) gave the BF(2)-capped compound [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))](2)(micro-Cl)(2) (7). The solid-state structure of 7 containing a PdP(2)O(2)B metallacycle has been determined. Chloride abstraction of 7 with AgBF(4) in acetone/water afforded the aqua compound [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))(H(2)O)(2)][BF(4)] (8) that reacted with [NH(4)](2)[WS(4)] to give [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))(2)](2)[micro-WS(4)] (9). The average Pd-S and W-S distances in 9 are 2.385(3) and 2.189(3) A, respectively. Treatment of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)](2) with 1H afforded the phosphinous acid adduct (eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)(1H) (10). Reduction of [CpRuCl(2)](x)() (Cp = eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with Zn followed by treatment with 1H resulted in the formation of the Zn(II) phosphinate complex [(CpRu(eta(6)-C(6)H(5)))(t)BuPO(2))](2)(ZnCl(2))(2) (11) that contains a Zn(2)O(4)P(2) eight-membered ring.

Treatment of 2-(methylsulfinyl)benzaldehyde (1) with ethylenediamine or (1R,2R)-(-)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane afforded N,N'-bis[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]ethylenediamine (L(1)) or (1R,2R)-N,N'-bis[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanedia mine (L(2)), respectively. Lithiation of 2-bromobenzaldehyde diethylacetal with n-BuLi/TMEDA followed by reaction with (1R,2S,5R)-(-)-menthyl-(S)-p-toluenesulfinate afforded 2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzaldehyde diethyl acetal (2). Deprotection of 2 with pyridinium tosylate followed by condensation with ethylenediamine, (1R,2R)-(-)-diaminocyclohexane, or (S,S)-(+)-diaminocyclohexane afforded N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]ethylenediamine (L(3)), (1R,2R)-N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanediamine ((R,R)-L(4)), or (S,S)-N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanediamine ((S,S)-L(4)), respectively. Treatment of [Ru(PPh(3))(3)Cl(2)] with L afforded trans-[Ru(L)Cl(2)] [L = L(1) (3), L(2) (4), L(3) (5), (R,R)-L(4) ((R,R)-6), (S,S)-L(4) ((S,S)-6)]. The X-ray structures of (S(S),R(S))-4, (R,R)-6, and (S,S)-6 have been determined. The average Ru-N, Ru-S, and Ru-Cl distances in (S(S),R(S))-4 are 2.063, 2.2301, and 2.4039 A, respectively. The corresponding distances in (R,R)-6 are 2.071, 2.256, and 2.411 A, and those in (S,S)-6, 2.058, 2.2275, and 2.3831 A. Compound 3 exhibited a reversible Ru(III/II) couple at 0.56 V vs Cp(2)Fe(+/0) in CH(2)Cl(2). Treatment of 3 with AgNO(3) in water afforded the aqua compound trans-[Ru(L(1))Cl(H(2)O)][PF(6)] (7), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The Ru-Cl, Ru-O, average Ru-N, and average Ru-S distances in 7 are 2.3733(6), 2.1469(16), 2.071, and 2.2442 A, respectively. Treatment of 3 with AgNO(3) followed by reaction with PPh(3) afforded [Ru(L(1))(PPh(3))(2)][PF(6)](2) (8). Treatment of [Os(PPh(3))(3)Cl(2)] with L(1) resulted in deoxygenation of one sulfoxide group of L(1) and formation of [Os(L(5))Cl(2)(PPh(3))] (9) (L(5) = N-[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-N'-[2-(methylthio)benzylididene]ethylenediamine), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The average Os-S(O), Os-N(trans to P), Os-N(trans to S), Os-P, and Os-Cl distances are 2.1931, 2.085, 2.175, 2.3641, and 2.4266 A, respectively.