Search

The prevalence and prognostic importance of diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes has only recently been appreciated. We tested the hypothesis that in insulin treated type 2 diabetes (D), carbohydrate consumption induces oxidative stress resulting in further impairment of diastolic function beyond structural myocardial stiffness. The effects of a pure carbohydrate breakfast (48 g) on oxidative stress and cardiac function were studied in the fasting and postmeal states in subjects without hypertension or overt cardiac disease (moderately well controlled D, n=21 and controls without D, n=20). Studied variables included systolic and early diastolic (E') myocardial velocities, traditional metabolic and hemodynamic parameters, serum nitrotyrosine, and sVCAM-1. In D compared to control subjects, the postmeal increase (∆) in glucose (1.44±2.78 vs. 0.11±0.72 mmol/l, p=0.04) and ∆nitrotyrosine (0.34±0.37 vs. -0.23±0.47 nM/l, p<0.001) were significantly higher. sVCAM-1 was higher in fasting and postmeal (p=0.02). E' was significantly lower in postmeal (7.3±1.3 vs. 9.6±1.3 cm/s, p<0.001) and fasting (p<0.001) whereas the rate pressure product was significantly higher (9 420±1 118 vs. 7 705±1 871 mm Hg/min, p<0.001). Multivariable regression models of the pooled data demonstrated that independent predictors for postmeal E' were ∆nitrotyrosine and septal thickness (R² 0.466) and for fasting E' age, ∆nitrotyrosine, and septal thickness (R² 0.400). In insulin requiring type 2 diabetes, carbohydrate consumption may induce oxidative stress that is associated with worsening diastolic function, indicating that this metabolic factor is an important determinant of diastolic dysfunction in the diabetic heart beyond the increase in structural myocardial stiffness., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Aim: To examine factors associated with insulin injection omission/non-adherence on a global basis., Methods: Telephone survey of 1530 insulin-treated adults with self-reported diabetes (110 type 1 and 1420 type 2) in China, France, Japan, Germany, Spain, Turkey, UK or USA. Participants had a mean age of ∼60 years, ∼15 years duration of diabetes and ∼9 years duration of insulin treatment. Regression analysis assessed the independent associations (p < 0.05) of country, participant characteristics and treatment-related beliefs/perceptions with number of days in the past month that an insulin injection was missed or not taken as prescribed., Results: One third (35%) of respondents reported one or more days (mean: ∼3 days) of insulin omission/non-adherence. Insulin omission/non-adherence differed widely across countries (range = 20-44%); differences in days of insulin omission/non-adherence were maintained after adjustment for other risk factors. Most risk factors had similar relationships with insulin omission/non-adherence across countries (few interactions with country). Insulin omission/non-adherence was more frequent among respondents who were male, younger, had type 2 diabetes or more frequent hypoglycaemia, were less successful with other treatment tasks, regarded insulin adherence as less important, had more practical/logistical barriers and difficulties with insulin adherence, were concerned that insulin treatment required lifestyle changes or were dissatisfied with the flexibility of injection timing., Conclusions: The results of this large-scale study suggest that insulin omission/non-adherence is common and associated with several modifiable risk factors (including practical barriers, injection difficulties, lifestyle burden and regimen inflexibility). Additional efforts to address these risk factors might reduce the frequency of insulin omission/non-adherence and lead to improved clinical outcomes., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Aims: To examine patient and physician beliefs regarding insulin therapy and the degree to which patients adhere to their insulin regimens., Methods: Internet survey of 1250 physicians (600 specialists, 650 primary care physicians) who treat patients with diabetes and telephone survey of 1530 insulin-treated patients (180 with Type 1 diabetes, 1350 with Type 2 diabetes) in China, France, Japan, Germany, Spain, Turkey, the UK or the USA., Results: One third (33.2%) of patients reported insulin omission/non-adherence at least 1 day in the last month, with an average of 3.3 days. Three quarters (72.5%) of physicians report that their typical patient does not take their insulin as prescribed, with a mean of 4.3 days per month of basal insulin omission/non-adherence and 5.7 days per month of prandial insulin omission/non-adherence. Patients and providers indicated the same five most common reasons for insulin omission/non-adherence: too busy; travelling; skipped meals; stress/emotional problems; public embarrassment. Physicians reported low patient success at initiating insulin in a timely fashion and adjusting insulin doses. Most physicians report that many insulin-treated patients do not have adequate glucose control (87.6%) and that they would treat more aggressively if not for concern about hypoglycaemia (75.5%). Although a majority of patients (and physicians) regard insulin treatment as restrictive, more patients see insulin treatment as having positive than negative impacts on their lives., Conclusions: Glucose control is inadequate among insulin-treated patients, in part attributable to insulin omission/non-adherence and lack of dose adjustment. There is a need for insulin regimens that are less restrictive and burdensome with lower risk of hypoglycaemia., (© 2012 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2012 Diabetes UK.)

Insulin analogues have been engineered to enhance desired molecular properties without altering immunogenicity. The majority of insulin pharmacology studies are conducted in healthy volunteers and patients with type 1 diabetes. At present, there are more patients with type 2 than type 1 diabetes receiving insulin treatment. As the responsibility for initiating insulin therapy in these patients continues to shift to primary care, it will be important for general practitioners to understand the different pharmacological properties of insulin preparations in patients with type 2 diabetes, so that treatment can be adapted to meet patients' physiological and lifestyle requirements. The purpose of this review is to summarize pharmacological studies of insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes. Faster onset of action of rapid acting insulin analogues has improved postprandial glycaemic control. Biphasic insulin analogues are associated with a lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with human biphasic preparations and allow for intensification from once to twice or thrice daily dosing. More predictable glycaemic-lowering profiles of the insulin analogues have also led to reductions in nocturnal hypoglycaemia, particularly comparing long-acting insulin analogues with protaminated human insulin. Enhancing insulin self-association and reversible binding with albumin has led to further reductions in variability. However, improvements can still be made. Effective once daily clinical dosing of long-acting insulin analogues is not possible in all patients. In addition, the protaminated component of biphasic insulin analogues do not provide the duration of action or profile for physiological basal insulin replacement and neither insulin glargine nor insulin detemir are suitable for mixing with other insulin analogues as this would substantially alter their pharmacokinetic properties. Enhancing the pharmacological predictability and extending the duration of action could simplify insulin titration and further reduce the incidence of hypoglycaemia., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

In people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hyperglycemia has a negative impact on cardiac function and cardiovascular risk. Beneficial effects of improved postprandial glycemic control have been shown for cardiovascular risk only. To demonstrate these beneficial effects on myocardial function, we investigated well-controlled T2DM patients on three insulin regimens with different impact on postprandial glucose control. For 24 months, 61 T2DM participants in a randomized study had either conventional therapy (CT) with human premixed insulin b.d. (n=20), intensified therapy (ICT) with Lispro at meals and NPH at bedtime (n=24), or supplementary therapy (SIT) with human regular insulin at meals (n=17). Metabolism and cardiovascular function were assessed before and 2 hours after a standardized carbohydrate breakfast (48 g) using tissue Doppler to measure diastolic myocardial function (E'). Age, BMI, dose of insulin, cardiovascular disease, and medication were comparable between the groups. Hb1Ac was comparable with CT, ICT, and SIT (6.6+/-0.6, 6.2+/-0.6, and 6.4+/-0.7%) and so was fasting glucose. Post-meal glucose increment was 60+/-45 mg/dl with CT, but 15+/-52 and 8+/-58 mg/dl with ICT and SIT (p<0.006). E' was significantly lower (p<0.03) with CT (6.8+/-1.0 cm/s) vs. ICT (7.7+/-1.6) and SIT (7.8+/-1.2 cm/s), and correlated with post-meal glucose (r=-0.2644, p<0.046). Intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness parameters were higher in CT (p<0.04). In T2DM patients, the long-term insulin regimens CT, ICT, and SIT achieved overall good metabolic control with significant differences, however, in postprandial glucose increments. The regimens achieving better post-meal glucose control were associated with better myocardial/vascular function.

Aims: To assess the effects of a structured in-patient diabetes training programme in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen using insulin glargine or NPH insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogues with respect to glycaemic control, weight development and incidence of hypoglycaemia in an outpatient-clinic setting., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, single centre, comparative observational study including 119 subjects. Pre-study treatment was a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin and a rapid-acting insulin analogue. Subjects either continued with NPH insulin (n=56) or were switched over to insulin glargine (n=63) at the discretion of the investigator (aiming at equal numbers in each group). Patients then attended routine out-patient follow up visits for 18 months., Results: HbA1c in the insulin glargine group improved statistically significant by -0.49%; [95%CI, -0.26, -0.71; p<0.001; HbA1c at endpoint 6.95+/-0.71%], whereas in the NPH group the reduction by -0.12% [95%CI, -0.31, 0.06; p=0.189; HbA1c at endpoint 7.22+/-0.74%] was statistically not significant. After 18 months of treatment the difference between treatment groups was 0.37% (p<0.015). Mean weight gain was significantly higher in the NPH group than in the glargine group (2.1 vs. 0.25 kg; p=0.025). A lower risk of hypoglycaemia in the glargine group (0.50 vs. 0.71 episodes/patient/month) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.081)., Conclusions: Following a structured in-patient diabetes training programme glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen improved significantly only with insulin glargine suggesting that training alone may not be sufficient to further improve metabolic control in relatively well controlled patients on NPH insulin. Therefore, in addition to a structured training programme also the insulin regimen should be optimized, e.g. by introduction of an insulin analogue.

Aim: Investigation of the impact of blood pressure and metabolic control on the nephroprotective effect of ramipril in insulin-dependent diabetics., Method: Within the framework of an open prospective therapeutic trial, 18 hypertensive, insulin-treated diabetics received ramipril, 5 mg/day, for an average period of 11 months. All the patients had previously received various forms of antihypertensive medication, and had microalbuminuria., Results: Urinary excretion of albumin and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase decreased in 13 patients (group 1), but increased in the remaining five patients (group 2). Blood pressure clearly decreased in group 1, but remained constant in group 2. In terms of clinical and biochemical data, the group 2 patients differed from those in group 1, having a lower age, a shorter history of diabetes and higher hemoglobin A1c levels despite higher doses of insulin., Conclusions: The present observations show that inadequate metabolic control and refractory hypertension in type 2 diabetics accelerate progression of diabetic nephropathy, and may thus negate the nephroprotective effect of the converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril.

Aims: Detection of possible effects on renal function parameters of long-term antihypertensive treatment administered to patients with diabetes mellitus., Study Design: Prolongation of an open trial, initially planned for one year, on the effect of felodipine 10 mg/day in diabetics (Fortschr. Med. 109 (1991), 53-56). Continued treatment of 7 hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetics (mean age 58 +/- 3 years, HbA1 8.2 +/- 0.3%) over a period of between 24 and 32 months., Results: The lowered blood pressure (from 160/94 to 150/82 mmHg; p less than 0.05) persisted. In the first 6 months of treatment, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) remained constant. Thereafter it increased (p less than 0.05 as compared with the figure seen after 6 months' treatment) to a degree that varied from one patient to another; overall, the UAE figures showed a relatively large intra-individual fluctuation during long-term therapy. Metabolic parameters remained uninfluenced by felodipine., Conclusions: It cannot be excluded that progression of diabetic renal disease cannot be adequately prevented by long-term treatment with calcium antagonists such as felodipine.