4 results on '"Scidà, G"'
Search Results
2. Eating habits and sleep quality in individuals with type 1 diabetes on continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump.
- Author
-
Corrado A, Scidà G, Vitale M, Caprio B, Costabile G, Annuzzi E, Della Pepa G, Lupoli R, and Bozzetto L
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adult, Aged, Young Adult, Time Factors, Biomarkers blood, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders diagnosis, Sleep Wake Disorders epidemiology, Sleep Wake Disorders physiopathology, Sleep Wake Disorders blood, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Postprandial Period, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 diagnosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 physiopathology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy, Insulin Infusion Systems, Blood Glucose metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring instrumentation, Sleep Quality, Insulin blood, Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage, Glycemic Control
- Abstract
Background and Aims: Sleep disorders are bidirectionally linked with eating behaviors and glucose metabolism, which could be clinically relevant in type 1 diabetes (T1D). We investigated the relationship between dietary habits and sleep quality in individuals with T1D on insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)., Methods and Results: In a cross-sectional study, dietary habits (7-day food diary, EPIC questionnaire) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire) were assessed in 59 men and 58 women with T1D, aged 19-79 years, using CGM and insulin pump. Differences in dietary habits and blood glucose after dinner (6 h) between participants differing in sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleep onset latency were evaluated. Bad Sleepers (n = 81) were twice as prevalent as Good Sleepers (n = 36) and had a significantly higher intake of fat than Good Sleepers (dinner: 30.7 ± 10.7 vs. 24.0 ± 10.5 g, p = 0.004). Short sleepers had a significantly higher usual intake (g/1000 kcal) of coffee and tea (90.4 ± 71.7 vs. 62.0 ± 35.6), alcoholic (47.8 ± 51.1 vs. 28.9 ± 31.5) and carbonated beverages (21.8 ± 38.1 vs. 9.3 ± 17.2) (p < 0.05 for all) than Long Sleepers. Long Sleep Onset Latency was associated with a significantly higher fat intake at dinner (41.8 ± 7.4 vs. 38.1 ± 9.1 % total energy, p = 0.029) than Short Sleep Onset Latency. No significant differences in post-dinner blood glucose levels were detected between participants with good or bad sleep quality., Conclusion: Sleep disruption is common in T1D and is associated with unhealthy dietary choices, especially at dinner, independently of post-dinner blood glucose control., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Postprandial glucose variability in type 1 diabetes: The individual matters beyond the meal
- Author
-
L. Bozzetto, D. Pacella, L. Cavagnuolo, M. Capuano, A. Corrado, G. Scidà, G. Costabile, A.A. Rivellese, G. Annuzzi, Bozzetto, L, Pacella, D, Cavagnuolo, L, Capuano, M, Corrado, A, Scidà, G, Costabile, G, Rivellese, A A, and Annuzzi, G
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Dietary Fiber ,Cross-Over Studies ,Type 1 diabete ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Inter- intraindividual variability ,General Medicine ,Cross-Over Studie ,Postprandial Period ,Diet ,Endocrinology ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ,Glucose ,Postprandial glucose response ,Glycemic Index ,Internal Medicine ,Humans ,Insulin ,Insulin pump ,Meal ,Continuous glucose monitoring ,Meals ,Human - Abstract
To explore intraindividual (between-meals) and interindividual (between-subjects) variability of postprandial glucose response (PGR) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).Data were taken from five cross-over trials in 61 subjects with T1DM on insulin pump wherein the effects of different dietary components or the intraindividual-variability of PGR to the same meal were evaluated by CGM. Predictors (type of meal or nutrient composition) of early (iAUCHigh-glycemic-index (HGI) and low-glycemic-index meals were the best positive and negative predictors of glucose iAUCBeyond the meal characteristics (including glycemic index, fat and fiber content), individual traits significantly influence PGR. Specific interindividual factors should be further identified to properly predict glucose response to meals with different composition in individuals with T1DM.
- Published
- 2022
4. Postprandial glucose variability in type 1 diabetes: The individual matters beyond the meal.
- Author
-
Bozzetto, L., Pacella, D., Cavagnuolo, L., Capuano, M., Corrado, A., Scidà, G., Costabile, G., Rivellese, A.A., and Annuzzi, G.
- Subjects
- *
TYPE 1 diabetes , *GLUCOSE , *BLOOD sugar , *GLYCEMIC index , *CROSSOVER trials , *DIETARY fiber , *FOOD consumption , *INSULIN , *MEALS - Abstract
Aim: To explore intraindividual (between-meals) and interindividual (between-subjects) variability of postprandial glucose response (PGR) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).Methods: Data were taken from five cross-over trials in 61 subjects with T1DM on insulin pump wherein the effects of different dietary components or the intraindividual-variability of PGR to the same meal were evaluated by CGM. Predictors (type of meal or nutrient composition) of early (iAUC0-3h), late (iAUC3-6h), total (iAUC0-6h), and time-course of postprandial blood glucose changes (iAUC3-6hminus0-3h) were evaluated using two mixed-effect linear regression models considering the patient's identification number as random-effect.Results: High-glycemic-index (HGI) and low-glycemic-index meals were the best positive and negative predictors of glucose iAUC0-3h, respectively. A Low-Fat-HGI meal significantly predicted iAUC3-6hminus0-3h (Estimate 3268; p = 0.017). Among nutrients, dietary fiber was the only significant negative predictor of iAUC0-3h (Estimate -550; p < 0.001) and iAUC0-6h (Estimate -742; p = 0.01) and positive predictor of iAUC3-6hminus0-3h (Estimate 336; p = 0.043). For all models, the random-effect patient was statistically significant (p < 0.001 by ANOVA).Conclusion: Beyond the meal characteristics (including glycemic index, fat and fiber content), individual traits significantly influence PGR. Specific interindividual factors should be further identified to properly predict glucose response to meals with different composition in individuals with T1DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.