Search

The design and manufacturing steps of a chip typically involve several parties. For example, a chip may comprise several third-party intellectual property (IP) cores and the integrated circuit (IC) fabrication may be outsourced to a third-party foundry. IP cores and ICs are shared with potentially untrusted third parties and, as a result, are subject to piracy attacks. Even more, any legally purchased chip may be reverse engineered to retrieve the design down to transistor level and, thereby, it is also subject to piracy attacks. In this article, we propose MixLock, an anti-piracy countermeasure for mixed-signal IP cores and ICs. MixLock protection is based on inserting a lock mechanism into the design such that correct functionality is established only after applying a key which is the designer’s secret. The lock mechanism acts on the mixed-signal performances by leveraging logic locking of the digital part. MixLock presents several key attributes. It is generally applicable, it is nonintrusive to the sensitive analog section, it incurs no performance penalty and has very low area and power overheads, it is fully automated, and it is capable of co-optimizing security in both the analog and digital domains. We demonstrate MixLock on a $\Sigma \Delta $ analog-to-digital converter (ADC) using hardware measurements and an audio demonstrator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Layout camouflaging can protect the intellectual property of modern circuits. Most prior art, however, incurs excessive layout overheads and necessitates customization of active-device manufacturing processes, i.e., the front-end-of-line (FEOL). As a result, camouflaging has typically been applied selectively, which can ultimately undermine its resilience. Here, we propose a low-cost and generic scheme—full-chip camouflaging can be finally realized without reservations. Our scheme is based on obfuscating the interconnects, i.e., the back-end-of-line (BEOL), through design-time handling for real and dummy wires and vias. To that end, we implement custom, BEOL-centric obfuscation cells, and develop a CAD flow using industrial tools. Our scheme can be applied to any design and technology node without FEOL-level modifications. Considering its BEOL-centric nature, we advocate applying our scheme in conjunction with split manufacturing, to furthermore protect against untrusted fabs. We evaluate our scheme for various designs at the physical, DRC-clean layout level. Our scheme incurs a significantly lower cost than most of the prior art. Notably, for fully camouflaged layouts, we observe average power, performance, and area overheads of 24.96%, 19.06%, and 32.55%, respectively. We conduct a thorough security study addressing the threats (attacks) related to untrustworthy FEOL fabs (proximity attacks) and malicious end-users (SAT-based attacks). An empirical key finding is that only large-scale camouflaging schemes like ours are practically secure against powerful SAT-based attacks. Another key finding is that our scheme hinders both placement- and routing-centric proximity attacks; correct connections are reduced by $7.47\times $ , and complexity is increased by $24.15\times $ , respectively, for such attacks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Logic locking is a holistic solution to counter manufacturing threats, such as intellectual property (IP) piracy and overbuilding at the hardware level. However, years of research has exposed various flaws in locking, including a Boolean satisfiability (SAT)-based attack. Consequently, several SAT-resilient locking techniques, such as SARLock, Anti-SAT, and SFLL have been proposed, although certain instances of them have also been broken by a class of attacks, called removal attack. In this article, we approach logic locking by leveraging well-known principles from very large-scale integration (VLSI) testing and elicit logic locking properties that dictate the resilience of a locking technique against different attacks. We present a revised version of SFLL, namely SFLL-rem, that not only retains all security properties of SFLL, delivering resilience to all the state-of-the-art attacks SFLL can thwart, but also to the latest removal attacks that broke some SFLL instances. Further, we develop a security-aware CAD framework integrated with industry tools that incurs only −1.5%, 0%, and 4.13% overhead for power, performance, and area, respectively. We demonstrate a silicon implementation of SFLL-rem on ARM Cortex-M0 microprocessor in 65 nm. Moreover, we provide a framework for an SoC designer to customize logic locking based on the SoC blocks and their threat models; this is illustrated by locking a multimillion-gate SoC provided by DARPA, and taking the SoC all the way to GDSII layout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the first time, we leverage the 2.5D interposer technology to establish system-level security in the face of hardware- and software-centric adversaries. More specifically, we integrate chiplets (i.e., third-party hard intellectual property of complex functionality, like microprocessors) using a security-enforcing interposer. Such hardware organization provides a robust 2.5D root of trust for trustworthy, yet powerful and flexible, computation systems. The security paradigms for our scheme, employed firmly by design and construction, are: 1) stringent physical separation of trusted from untrusted components and 2) runtime monitoring. The system-level activities of all untrusted commodity chiplets are checked continuously against security policiesvia physically separated security features. Aside from the security promises, the good economics of outsourced supply chains are still maintained; the system vendor is free to procure chiplets from the open market, while only producing the interposer and assembling the 2.5D system oneself. We showcase our scheme using the Cortex-M0 core and the AHB-Lite bus by ARM, building a secure 64-core system with shared memories. We evaluate our scheme through hardware simulation, considering different threat scenarios. Finally, we devise a physical-design flow for 2.5D systems, based on commercial-grade design tools, to demonstrate and evaluate our 2.5D root of trust. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fabless business model has given rise to many security threats, including piracy of intellectual property (IP), overproduction, counterfeiting, reverse engineering (RE), and hardware Trojans (HT). Such threats severely undermine the benefits of the fabless model. Among the countermeasures developed to thwart piracy and RE attacks, logic locking has emerged as a promising and versatile solution that is being adopted by both academia and industry. The idea behind logic locking is to lock the design using a “keying” mechanism; only the rightful owner has control over the locked design. Therefore, the design remains nonfunctional without the knowledge of the key. In this article, we survey the evolution of logic locking over the last decade. We introduce various “cat-and-mouse” games involved in logic locking along with its novel applications—including, processor pipelines, graphics processing units (GPUs), and analog circuits. We aim this article to be a primer for researchers interested in developing new logic-locking techniques and employing logic locking in different application domains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protecting intellectual property (IP) has become a serious challenge for chip designers. Most countermeasures are tailored for CMOS integration and tend to incur excessive overheads, resulting from additional circuitry or device-level modifications. On the other hand, power density is a critical concern for sub-50 nm nodes, necessitating alternate design concepts. Although initially tailored for error-tolerant applications, imprecise computing has gained traction as a general-purpose design technique. Emerging devices are currently being explored to implement ultralow-power circuits for inexact computing applications. In this paper, we quantify the security threats of imprecise computing using emerging devices. More specifically, we leverage the innate polymorphism and tunable stochastic behavior of spin-orbit torque (SOT) devices, particularly, the giant spin-Hall effect (GSHE) switch. We enable IP protection (by means of logic locking and camouflaging) simultaneously for deterministic and probabilistic computing, directly at the GSHE device level. We conduct a comprehensive security analysis using state-of-the-art Boolean satisfiability (SAT) attacks; this paper demonstrates the superior resilience of our GSHE primitive when tailored for deterministic computing. We also demonstrate how probabilistic computing can thwart most, if not all, existing SAT attacks. Based on this finding, we propose an attack scheme called probabilistic SAT (PSAT) which can bypass the defense offered by logic locking and camouflaging for imprecise computing schemes. Further, we illustrate how careful application of our GSHE primitive can remain secure even on the application of the PSAT attack. Finally, we also discuss side-channel attacks and invasive monitoring, which are arguably even more concerning threats than SAT attacks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outsourcing of integrated circuit (IC) fabrication to external foundries has lead to many new security vulnerabilities, including IC piracy, overbuilding, and reverse engineering. In this regard, logic locking (LL) was introduced to protect intellectual property from such threats. In this paper, we evaluate the strength of various LL techniques, including earlier works, such as random LL (RLL) and fault analysis-based LL (FLL), against power-based side-channel attack. We have developed attacks where at least 60% of the key bits can be successfully recovered for 60% of the circuits for both RLL and FLL using a 32-bit key. However, the success rate reduces to 45% and 35% for RLL and FLL, respectively, when using a 64-bit key. We demonstrate the practicality of our proposed attack by mounting it against RLL and FLL implementations of ISCAS’85 and MCNC benchmark circuits on Spartan-6 FPGA platform. Further, we present differential power analysis (DPA) results on mutual information analysis on LL techniques that capture any dependence between the intermediate data and the captured power traces. We also formally establish that resilience to satisfiability-based (SAT) attack implies resilience to DPA attack as well for an LL technique. We validate this further via experiments on Spartan-6 FPGA on SAKURA-G development board for a recent LL technique that is known to thwart the SAT attack. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to globalization of integrated circuit (IC) design flow, rogue elements in the supply chain can pirate ICs, overbuild ICs, and insert hardware Trojans. EPIC locks the design by randomly inserting additional gates; only a correct key makes the design to produce correct outputs. We demonstrate that an attacker can decipher the locked netlist, in a time linear to the number of keys, by sensitizing the key-bits to the output. We then develop techniques to fix this vulnerability and make an attacker’s effort truly exponential in the number of inserted keys. We introduce a new security metric and a method to deliver strong logic locking. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In order to keep pace with the growing complexity of integrated circuits (ICs), IC and system designers are increasingly using electronic system level (ESL) design tools. ESL tool sales were around $460 million in 2011. The value of the ICs designed using these tools is at least an order of magnitude more. Concurrently, advanced IC reverse engineering techniques are being developed and used by attackers. In response, several anti-reverse engineering techniques have been proposed for integration into the IC design flow. An important class of defenses hardens the controllers that orchestrate the functionality of designs generated by ESL tools. We demonstrate an attack to recover the controller in any ESL-generated design even if the controller has been hardened using state-of-the-art controller hardening techniques. The attack analyzes the unhardened parts of the controller (i.e., the controller output logic and datapath) and reconciles this information with the architectural, controller, and timing constraints implicit in and underlying all ESL design methodologies. We then propose a countermeasure that inserts decoy connections into an ESL tool-generated design to thwart reverse engineering. We introduce a security metric to quantify the effectiveness of the developed attacks and defenses. We demonstrate the attack and defenses on designs generated by state-of-the-art ESL tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Designers use third-party intellectual property (IP) cores and outsource various steps in their integrated circuit (IC) design flow, including fabrication. As a result, security vulnerabilities have been emerging, forcing IC designers and end-users to reevaluate their trust in hardware. If an attacker gets hold of an unprotected design, attacks such as reverse engineering, insertion of malicious circuits, and IP piracy are possible. In this paper, we shed light on the vulnerabilities in very large scale integration (VLSI) design and fabrication flow, and survey design-for-trust (DfTr) techniques that aim at regaining trust in IC design. We elaborate on four DfTr techniques: logic encryption, split manufacturing, IC camouflaging, and Trojan activation. These techniques have been developed by reusing VLSI test principles. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Creating backdoors in integrated circuits (ICs), stealing hardware intellectual property, counterfeiting electronic components, reverse engineering ICs, and injecting malware in ICs are no longer nation state acts requiring specialized, expensive, and unlimited resources. Democratization of IC design has created numerous opportunities for rogues throughout the IC supply chain to inflict these attacks with aplomb and for a variety of reasons: personal gain, economic harm, economic gain, bringing disrepute, and sheer fun among others. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]