Search

Your search keyword '"Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves" Topic intensive care
2 results on '"Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves"'

1. Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the AMIB, ABTO, BRICNet, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System

Author

Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves, Cátia Moreira Guterres, Cassiano Teixeira, Cinara Stein, Cristiano Augusto Franke, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Daniela Ferreira Salomão Pontes, Diego Silva Leite Nunes, Edson Abdala, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Fernando Augusto Bozza, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Joel de Andrade, Luciane Nascimento Cruz, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Miriam Cristine Vahl Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Rosana Reis Nothen, Suzana Margareth Lobo, Tatiana Helena Rech, Thiago Lisboa, Verônica Colpani, and Maicon Falavigna

Subjects
Guidelines, Organ donation, Intensive care, Brain death, GRADE, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, RC86-88.9
Abstract

Abstract Objective To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management. Method A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, joined a task force formed by the General Coordination Office of the National Transplant System/Brazilian Ministry of Health (CGSNT-MS), the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine (AMIB), the Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation (ABTO), and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet). The questions were developed within the scope of the 2011 Brazilian Guidelines for Management of Adult Potential Multiple-Organ Deceased Donors. The topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and use of checklists. The outcomes considered for decision-making were cardiac arrest, number of organs recovered or transplanted per donor, and graft function/survival. Rapid systematic reviews were conducted, and the quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Two expert panels were held in November 2016 and February 2017 to classify the recommendations. A systematic review update was performed in June 2020, and the recommendations were reviewed through a Delphi process with the panelists between June and July 2020. Results A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong (lung-protective ventilation strategy, vasopressors and combining arginine vasopressin to control blood pressure, antidiuretic hormones to control polyuria, serum potassium and magnesium control, and antibiotic use), 11 as weak (alveolar recruitment maneuvers, low-dose dopamine, low-dose corticosteroids, thyroid hormones, glycemic and serum sodium control, nutritional support, body temperature control or hypothermia, red blood cell transfusion, and goal-directed protocols), and 1 was considered a good clinical practice (volemic expansion). Conclusion Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak. The observed lack of robust evidence on the topic highlights the importance of the present guideline to improve the management of brain-dead potential organ donors.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Diretrizes brasileiras para o manejo de potenciais doadores de órgãos em morte encefálica. Uma força-tarefa composta por Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos, Brazilian Research in Critical Care Network e Coordenação Geral do Sistema Nacional de Transplantes

Author

Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves, Cátia Moreira Guterres, Cassiano Teixeira, Cinara Stein, Cristiano Augusto Franke, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Daniela Ferreira Salomão Pontes, Diego Silva Leite Nunes, Edson Abdala, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Fernando Augusto Bozza, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Joel de Andrade, Luciane Nascimento Cruz, Luciano César Pontes Azevedo, Miriam Cristine Vahl Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Rosana Reis Nothen, Suzana Margareth Lobo, Tatiana Helena Rech, Thiago Costa Lisboa, Verônica Colpani, and Maicon Falavigna

Subjects
Doação de órgãos, GRADE, Brain death, RC86-88.9, Intensive care, Terapia intensiva, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, Diretrizes, Guidelines, Morte encefálica, Organ donation
Abstract

RESUMO Objetivo: Fornecer recomendações para nortear o manejo clínico do potencial doador em morte encefálica. Métodos: O presente documento foi formulado em dois painéis compostos por uma força tarefa integrada por 27 especialistas de diferentes áreas que responderam a questões dirigidas aos seguintes temas: ventilação mecânica, hemodinâmica, suporte endócrino-metabólico, infecção, temperatura corporal, transfusão sanguínea, e uso de checklists. Os desfechos considerados foram: parada cardíaca, número de órgãos retirados ou transplantados e função/sobrevida dos órgãos transplantados. A qualidade das evidências das recomendações foi avaliada pelo sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Resultados: Foram geradas 19 recomendações a partir do painel de especialistas. Dessas, 7 foram classificadas como fortes, 11 fracas e uma foi considerada boa prática clínica. Conclusão: Apesar da concordância entre os membros do painel em relação à maior parte das recomendações, o grau de recomendação é fraco em sua maioria. Abstract Objective: To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management. Methods: A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, answered questions related to the following topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamics, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and checklists use. The outcomes considered were cardiac arrests, number of organs removed or transplanted as well as function / survival of transplanted organs. The quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to classify the recommendations. Results: A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong, 11 as weak and 1 was considered a good clinical practice. Conclusion: Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results