Search

Intermittent control combines open-loop trajectories with feedback at discrete time instances determined by events. Among other applications, it has recently been used to model quiet standing in humans where the system was assumed to be time-invariant. This article expands this work to the time-variant case by introducing an adaptive intermittent controller that exploits the well-known self-tuning architecture of adaptive control with a Kalman filter to perform online state and parameter estimation. Simulation and experimental results using a rotational inverted pendulum show advantages of the intermittent controllers compared to continuous feedback control since the former can provide persistent excitation due to their internal triggering mechanism, even when no external reference changes or disturbances are applied. Moreover, the results show that the event thresholds of intermittent control can be used to adjust the degree of responsiveness of the adaptation in the system, becoming a tool to balance the trade-off between steady-state performance and flexibility against parametric changes, addressing the stability–plasticity dilemma of adaptation and learning in control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explain the 0.2–2Hz oscillation in human balance. Motivation: Oscillation (0.2–2 Hz) in the control signal (ankle moment) is sustained independently of external disturbances and exaggerated in Parkinson's disease. Does resonance or limit cycles in the neurophysiological feedback loop cause this oscillation? We investigate two linear (non-predictive, predictive) and one non-linear (intermittent-predictive) control model (NPC, PC, IPC). Methods: Fourteen healthy participants, strapped to an actuated single segment robot with dynamics of upright standing, used natural haptic-visual feedback and myoelectric control signals from lower leg muscles to maintain balance. An input disturbance applied stepwise changes in external force. A linear time invariant model (ARX) extracted the delayed component of the control signal related linearly to the disturbance, leaving the remaining, larger, oscillatory non-linear component. We optimized model parameters and noise (observation, motor) to replicate concurrently (i) estimated-delay, (ii) time-series of the linear component, and (iii) magnitude-frequency spectrum and transient magnitude response of the non-linear component. Results (mean±S.D., p<0.05): NPC produced estimated delays (0.116±0.03s) significantly lower than experiment (0.145±0.04s). Overall fit (i)–(iii) was (79±7%, 83±7%, 84±6% for NPC, PC, IPC). IPC required little or no noise. Mean frequency of experimental oscillation (0.99±0.16 Hz) correlated trial by trial with closed loop resonant frequency (fres), not limit cycles, nor sampling rate. NPC (0.36±0.08Hz) and PC (0.86±0.4Hz) showed fres significantly lower than IPC (0.98±0.2Hz). Conclusion: Human balance control requires short-term prediction. Significance: IPC mechanisms (prediction error, threshold related sampling, sequential re-initialization of open-loop predictive control) explain resonant gain without uncontrolled oscillation for healthy balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modular organization in control architecture may underlie the versatility of human motor control; but the nature of the interface relating sensory input through task-selection in the space of performance variables to control actions in the space of the elemental variables is currently unknown. Our central question is whether the control architecture converges to a serial process along a single channel? In discrete reaction time experiments, psychologists have firmly associated a serial single channel hypothesis with refractoriness and response selection [psychological refractory period (PRP)]. Recently, we developed a methodology and evidence identifying refractoriness in sustained control of an external single degree-of-freedom system. We hypothesize that multi-segmental whole-body control also shows refractoriness. Eight participants controlled their whole body to ensure a head marker tracked a target as fast and accurately as possible. Analysis showed enhanced delays in response to stimuli with close temporal proximity to the preceding stimulus. Consistent with our preceding work, this evidence is incompatible with control as a linear time invariant process. This evidence is consistent with a single-channel serial ballistic process within the intermittent control paradigm with an intermittent interval of around 0.5 s. A control architecture reproducing intentional human movement control must reproduce refractoriness. Intermittent control is designed to provide computational time for an online optimization process and is appropriate for flexible adaptive control. For human motor control we suggest that parallel sensory input converges to a serial, single channel process involving planning, selection, and temporal inhibition of alternative responses prior to low dimensional motor output. Such design could aid robots to reproduce the flexibility of human control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, input power, as opposed to the usual input amplitude, constraints are introduced in the context of intermittent control. They are shown to result in a combination of quadratic optimisation and quadratic constraints. The main motivation for considering input power constraints is its similarity with semi-active control. Such methods are commonly used to provide damping in mechanical systems and structures. It is shown that semi-active control can be re-expressed and generalised as control with power constraints and can thus be implemented as power-constrained intermittent control. The method is illustrated using simulations of resonant mechanical systems and the constrained nature of the power flow is represented using power-phase-plane plots. We believe the approach we present will be useful for the control design of both semi-active and low-power vibration suppression systems. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Control using a sequence of ‘taps’, in contrast to the usual smooth control, is shown to fit within the established intermittent control framework. In particular, a specially designed generalised hold gives rise to tapping behaviour optimised according to the underlying linear-quadratic design. Both fixed-interval and event-driven tapping are included in this approach and some basic stability analysis is given. Illustrative examples are presented and the advantages of tapping in the context of electromechanical servo systems with friction are explored using a laboratory experiment. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

An intermittent controller is a form of hybrid controller which adds a generalised sample and hold mechanism to an underlying continuous-time feedback control system. The sampling may be non-uniform or event driven. One particular form of the hold, termed the system-matched hold (SMH) mimics the behaviour of the closed-loop feedback control signal during the intermittent intervals. It is shown in this article that this choice of hold leads to an intermittent separation principle. In particular, this simple analytical result ensures that when using the SMH, the separation properties of the underlying state-estimate feedback control system carry over to the intermittent control system. This separation principle for the SMH has the important consequence that, unlike the zero-order hold case, the stability of the closed-loop system in the fixed sampling case is not dependent on sample interval. It is therefore suggested that the SMH should replace the conventional zero-order hold in circumstances where the sample interval is unknown, time-varying or determined by events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The act-and-wait control introduced by Insperger refid="ref1"/ is shown to be related to a form of intermittent control. Theoretical and practical similarities and differences between the two methods are explored. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The reverse-engineering idea developed by Maciejowski in the context of model-based predictive control is applied to the redesign of continuous-time compensators as intermittent controllers. Not only does this give a way of designing constrained input and state versions of continuous-time compensators but also provides a method for turning continuous-time compensators into event-driven versions. The procedure is illustrated by three examples: an event-driven PID controller relevant to the human balance control problem, a constrained version of the classical mechanical vibration absorber of den Hartog and an event driven and constrained vibration absorber. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An intermittent controller with fixed sampling interval is recast as an event-driven controller. The key aspect of intermittent control that makes this possible is the use of basis functions, or, equivalently, a generalised hold, to generate the intersample open-loop control signal. The controller incorporates both feedforward events in response to known signals and feedback events in response to detected disturbances. The latter feature makes use of an extended basis-function generator to generate open-loop predictions of states to be compared with measured or observed states. Intermittent control is based on an underlying continuous-time controller; it is emphasised that the design of this continuous-time controller is important, particularly in the presence of input disturbances. Illustrative simulation examples are given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The generalised hold formulation of intermittent control is re-examined and shown to have some useful theoretical and practical properties. It is shown that this provides a foundation for constrained model predictive control in an intermittent context. The method is illustrated using an example and verified with experimental results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]