1. Interassay and interobserver comparability study of four programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays in triple-negative breast cancer
- Author
-
Alexander Hapfelmeier, Sebastian Foersch, Siranush Karapetyan, Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Katja Steiger, Kristina Schwamborn, Marion Kiechle, Wilko Weichert, Wilfried Roth, Dirk Oettler, and Aurelia Noske
- Subjects
Oncology ,CPS, combined positive score ,TC, tumor cells ,ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor ,Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms ,B7-H1 Antigen ,Medicine ,HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ,Triple-negative breast cancer ,RC254-282 ,ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient ,biology ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,General Medicine ,MSI, microsatellite instability ,Immunohistochemistry ,pCR, pathological complete response ,PFS, progression-free survival ,Original Article ,IC-Score ,IC, immune cells ,IHC, immunohistochemistry ,Programmed death ,PD-L1 ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Concordance ,TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer ,OS, overall survival ,Breast cancer ,Internal medicine ,TPS, tumor proportion score ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,Humans ,Programmed death-ligand 1 ,Reproducibility ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,medicine.disease ,ITT, intention to treat ,CI, confidence interval ,PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1 ,biology.protein ,Surgery ,CPS ,business ,Kappa ,TMB, tumor mutational burden - Abstract
Different immunohistochemical programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays and scorings have been reported to yield variable results in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We compared the analytical concordance and reproducibility of four clinically relevant PD-L1 assays assessing immune cell (IC) score, tumor proportion score (TPS), and combined positive score (CPS) in TNBC. Primary TNBC resection specimens (n = 104) were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263, DAKO 22C3, and DAKO 28–8. PD-L1 expression was scored according to guidelines on virtual whole slide images by four trained readers. The mean PD-L1 positivity at IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 ranged between 53% and 75% with the highest positivity for SP263 and comparable levels for 22C3, 28–8, and SP142. Inter-assay agreement was good between 28–8 and 22C3 across all scores and cut-offs (kappa 0.68–0.74) and for both assays with SP142 at IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 (kappa 0.61–0.67). The agreement between SP263 and all other assays was substantially lower for all scores. Inter-reader agreement for each assay was good to excellent for IC-score ≥1% (kappa 0.73–0.78) and CPS ≥1 (kappa 0.68–0.74), fair to good for CPS ≥10 (kappa 0.52–0.67) and TPS ≥1% (kappa 0.53–0.72). The percentage of overlapping cases in the positive/negative category was >90% between IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 but below when comparing IC-score ≥1% with CPS ≥10. We demonstrate an overall good inter-reader agreement for all PD-L1 assays in TNBC along with assay specific differences in positivity and concordances, which may aid to select the right test strategy in routine diagnostics., Highlights • Different PD-L1 IHC assays and scorings may show variable results in TNBC. • Overall good assay concordance between SP142, 22C3, and 28–8 at IC-score 1%. • Overall good assay concordance between SP142, 22C3, and 28–8 at CPS 1. • SP142 is less optimal for CPS assessment at higher cut-offs. • SP263 assay is not interchangeable with the other three PD-L1 assays.
- Published
- 2021