Search

Background The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for psoriasis are significantly compromised by variable treatment responses. Thus, more precise management of psoriasis is needed. Objectives We aim to identify subgroups of psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapies, based on changes in their disease activity over time, that may better inform patient management. Methods Here we apply latent class mixed modelling, to identify trajectory-based patient subgroups from longitudinal, routine clinical data on disease severity, as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), from 3546 patients in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register, as well as in an independent cohort of 2889 subjects pooled across four clinical trials. Results We discovered four, discrete classes of global response trajectories, each characterised in terms of time to response, size of effect and relapse. Each class was associated with differing clinical characteristics, e.g. Body Mass Index, baseline PASI, and prevalence of different manifestations. Our results were verified in a second cohort of clinical trials subjects, where similar trajectories following initiation of biologic therapy were identified. Further, we found differential associations of the genetic marker HLA-C*06:02 between our registry-identified trajectories. Conclusion These subgroups, defined by change in disease over time, may be indicative of distinct endotypes driven by different biological mechanisms and may help inform the management of patients with psoriasis. Future work will aim to further delineate these mechanisms by extensively characterising the subgroups with additional molecular and pharmacological data.

Objective.To determine the risk of a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) compared to patients with psoriasis and a general population cohort.Methods.Incident PsA patients aged 18–89 years at diagnosis were identified from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. All patients with PsA were matched to 2 cohorts of patients, both at a 1:4 ratio. The first cohort included patients with psoriasis (and no PsA) and the second was a general population cohort (with no psoriasis or PsA). The baseline prevalence of OA was calculated for each study cohort. The incidence of OA was calculated, and adjusted relative risks (RRadj) were calculated using conditional Poisson regression.Results.We identified 6783 incident PsA patients. The baseline prevalence of OA ranged from 22.1% (95% CI 21.1–23.1) in the PsA cohort to 12.6% (95% CI 12.2–13.0) and 11.0% (95% CI 10.6–11.3) in the psoriasis and general population cohorts, respectively. The incidence of OA was significantly higher in the PsA cohort compared to the psoriasis and general population cohorts after adjusting for BMI (RRadj 1.68, 95% CI 1.46–1.93, and RRadj 1.86, 95% CI 1.62–2.14, respectively).Conclusion.An increased risk of OA was observed in patients with PsA compared to patients with psoriasis alone and those in the general population. Further work is needed to determine whether this reflects a true increase in OA risk or misdiagnosed PsA, and the extent to which it can be explained by differences in the opportunity for OA diagnosis between cohorts.

Ustekinumab is an effective treatment for psoriasis, but response varies between patients. The formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may explain part of this variation by reducing the free ustekinumab level. Currently, published analyses of the clinical impact of ADAs are incomplete. In this observational cross-sectional multicenter study of 340 patients, we evaluated the impact of ADAs on ustekinumab level and clinical response as assessed by the PASI. Circulating ADA levels were measured using two assays: a drug-sensitive radioimmunoassay and a drug-tolerant ELISA. Circulating ustekinumab levels were measured using an ELISA. ADAs were detected in 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.2–4.2) and in 10.6% (95% CI = 7.9–13.9) of patients using the radioimmunoassay and drug-tolerant ELISA, respectively. At least 85% of the ADAs were neutralizing. Compared with patients negative for ADAs, ADA positivity in the radioimmunoassay and drug-tolerant ELISA were associated with lower median ustekinumab levels (−0.62 μg/ml [95% CI = −1.190 to −0.30] and −0.74 μg/ml [95% CI = −1.09 to −0.47], respectively) and higher absolute PASI (6.6 [95% CI = 3.0–9.9] and 1.9 [95% CI = 0.4–4.0], respectively). Absence of detectable ustekinumab regardless of ADA status correlated with poor clinical outcome (median sample PASI 10.1, 6.5 [95% CI = 3.9–8.8] compared with patients positive for ustekinumab). In conclusion, substantially reduced drug exposure resulting from ADAs formation is associated with impaired clinical response.

BackgroundIt is unclear if people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) (joint, bowel and skin) and on immune modifying therapy have increased risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes.MethodsWith the approval of NHS England we conducted a cohort study, using OpenSAFELY, analysingroutinely-collected primary care data linked to hospital admission, death and previously unavailable hospital prescription data. We used Cox regression (adjusting for confounders) to estimate hazard ratios (HR) comparing risk of COVID-19-death, death/critical care admission, and hospitalisation (March to September 2020) in: 1) people with IMIDs compared to the general population; and 2) people with IMIDs on targeted immune modifying drugs (e.g., biologics) compared to standard systemic treatment (e.g., methotrexate).FindingsWe identified 17,672,065 adults; of 1,163,438 (7%) with IMIDs, 19,119 people received targeted immune modifying drugs, and 200,813 received standard systemics. We saw evidence of increased COVID-19-death (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.20, 1.27), and COVID-19 hospitalisation (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.29, 1.35) in individuals with IMIDs overall compared to individuals without IMIDs of the same age, sex, deprivation and smoking status. We saw no evidence of increased COVID-19 deaths with targeted compared to standard systemic treatments (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.80, 1.33). There was no evidence of increased COVID-19-related death in those prescribed TNF inhibitors, IL-12/23, IL7, IL-6 or JAK inhibitors compared to standard systemics. Rituximab was associated with increased COVID-19 death (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.11, 2.56); however, this finding may relate to confounding.InterpretationCOVID-19 death and hospitalisation was higher in people with IMIDs. We saw no increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes in those on most targeted immune modifying drugs for IMIDs compared to standard systemics.RESEARCH IN CONTEXTEvidence before this studyWe searched PubMed on May 19th, 2021, using the terms “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2” and “rheumatoid arthritis”, “psoriatic arthritis” “ankylosing spondylitis”, “Crohn’s disease” “ulcerative colitis” “hidradenitis suppurativa” and “psoriasis”, to identify primary research articles examining severe COVID-19 outcome risk in individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and those on immune modifying therapy. The studies identified (including matched cohort studies and studies in disease-specific registries) were limited by small sample sizes and number of outcomes. Most studies did not show a signal of increased adverse COVID-19 outcomes in those on targeted therapies, with the exception of rituximab. Additionally, disease-specific registries are subject to selection bias and lack denominator populations.Added value of the studyIn our large population-based study of 17 million individuals, including 1 million people with IMIDs and just under 200,000 receiving immune modifying medications, we saw evidence that people with IMIDs had an increased risk of COVID-19-related death compared to the general population after adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, deprivation, smoking status) (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.20, 1.27). We saw differences by IMID type, with COVID-19-related death being increased by the most in people with inflammatory joint disease (HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.40, 1.54). We also saw some evidence that those with IMIDs were more likely, compared to the general population, to have COVID-19-related critical care admission/death (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.21, 1.28) and hospitalisation (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.29, 1.35).Compared to people with IMIDs taking standard systemics, we saw no evidence of differences in severe COVID-19-related outcomes with TNF inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-12/23 inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors. However, there was some evidence that rituximab was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19-related death (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.11, 2.56) and death/critical care admission (HR 1.92, 95%CI 1.31, 2.81). We also saw evidence of an increase in COVID-19-related hospital admissions in people prescribed rituximab (HR 1.59, 95%CI 1.16, 2.18) or JAK inhibition (HR 1.81, 95%CI 1.09, 3.01) compared to those on standard systemics, although this could be related to worse underlying health rather than the drugs themselves, and numbers of events were small.This is the first study to our knowledge to use high-cost drug data on medicines supplied by hospitals at a national scale in England (to identify targeted therapies). The availability of these data fills an important gap in the medication record of those with more specialist conditions treated by hospitals creating an important opportunity to generate insights to these conditions and these medicationsImplications of all of the available evidenceOur study offers insights into future risk mitigation strategies and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination priorities for individuals with IMIDs, as it highlights that those with IMIDs and those taking rituximab may be at risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Critically, our study does not show a link between most targeted immune modifying medications compared to standard systemics and severe COVID-19 outcomes. However, the increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes that we saw in people with IMIDs and those treated with rituximab merits further study.

BackgroundThe increase in the number of available biologic agents for psoriasis has led to an urgent need to evaluate their associated risk of serious infections to help inform clinical decisions.MethodologyWe systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for biologics targeting TNF (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol), interleukin (IL)-12/23 (ustekinumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17RA (brodalumab) and IL-23p19 (guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab) for the primary outcome serious infections, at 10– 16 weeks, 1 year and 3 years. Peto’s method (fixed effect model) was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) in meta-analyses comparing biologics with one another, methotrexate, or placebo.ResultsForty-three publications (49 trials) consisting of 29,724 participants met our inclusion criteria. Serious infections across all studies were low (n=97) at 10–16 weeks and did not show an increased risk with biologic therapies compared with placebo. Seven head-to-head RCTs were identified, most of which showed no significant difference in the risk of serious infections at 10–16 weeks and at 1 year. Adalimumab was not associated with a significant increased risk of serious infections compared with methotrexate in children at 10–16 weeks.ConclusionsBiologics for psoriasis were not associated with an increased risk of serious infections compared with placebo or one another at 10–16 weeks. Longer-term, real-world data with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Summary Background Patients on therapeutic immunosuppressants for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were excluded from COVID-19 vaccine trials. We therefore aimed to evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in patients taking methotrexate and commonly used targeted biological therapies, compared with healthy controls. Given the roll-out of extended interval vaccination programmes to maximise population coverage, we present findings after the first dose. Methods In this cohort study, we recruited consecutive patients with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis who were receiving methotrexate or targeted biological monotherapy (tumour necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitors, interleukin [IL]-17 inhibitors, or IL-23 inhibitors) from a specialist psoriasis centre serving London and South East England. Consecutive volunteers without psoriasis and not receiving systemic immunosuppression who presented for vaccination at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK) were included as the healthy control cohort. All participants had to be eligible to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine. Immunogenicity was evaluated immediately before and on day 28 (±2 days) after vaccination. The primary outcomes were humoral immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, defined as neutralising antibody responses to wild-type SARS-CoV-2, and spike-specific T-cell responses (including interferon-γ, IL-2, and IL-21) 28 days after vaccination. Findings Between Jan 14 and April 4, 2021, 84 patients with psoriasis (17 on methotrexate, 27 on TNF inhibitors, 15 on IL-17 inhibitors, and 25 on IL-23 inhibitors) and 17 healthy controls were included. The study population had a median age of 43 years (IQR 31–52), with 56 (55%) males, 45 (45%) females, and 85 (84%) participants of White ethnicity. Seroconversion rates were lower in patients receiving immunosuppressants (60 [78%; 95% CI 67–87] of 77) than in controls (17 [100%; 80–100] of 17), with the lowest rate in those receiving methotrexate (seven [47%; 21–73] of 15). Neutralising activity against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 was significantly lower in patients receiving methotrexate (median 50% inhibitory dilution 129 [IQR 40–236]) than in controls (317 [213–487], p=0·0032), but was preserved in those receiving targeted biologics (269 [141–418]). Neutralising titres against the B.1.1.7 variant were similarly low in all participants. Cellular immune responses were induced in all groups, and were not attenuated in patients receiving methotrexate or targeted biologics compared with controls. Interpretation Functional humoral immunity to a single dose of BNT162b2 is impaired by methotrexate but not by targeted biologics, whereas cellular responses are preserved. Seroconversion alone might not adequately reflect vaccine immunogenicity in individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases receiving therapeutic immunosuppression. Real-world pharmacovigilance studies will determine how these findings reflect clinical effectiveness. Funding UK National Institute for Health Research.

There are concerns that immunomodulatory therapies may increase the risks of developing basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients with moderate-severe psoriasis. A systematic review showed that psoriasis patients were significantly more likely to develop SCC than the general population, though included studies lacked adequate comparator cohorts and adjustment for relevant confounding factors including heterogeneity between BCC and SCC in association with phototherapy and immunomodulatory therapies and lacked data on newer biologic therapies. We therefore followed-up a large prospective patient cohort to determine whether the risks of developing BCC and SCC are increased in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy compared with those treated with non-biologic systemic therapies only.

Altres ajuts: Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; King's College London; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre; Psoriasis Association. Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship in Clinical Science (205039/Z/16/Z); Health Data Research UK (grant no. LOND1); Health Data Research UK (grant no. MR/S003126/1); UK MRC, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Department of Health and Social Care (England); Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health; Social Care Directorates; Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government); Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland); British Heart Foundation; Wellcome Trust; NIHR Academic Clinical Lectureship through the University of Manchester; NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator (MR/101 1808/1); NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Background: Registry data suggest that people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving targeted systemic therapies have fewer adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes compared with patients receiving no systemic treatments. Objectives: We used international patient survey data to explore the hypothesis that greater risk-mitigating behaviour in those receiving targeted therapies may account, at least in part, for this observation. Methods: Online surveys were completed by individuals with psoriasis (globally) or rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) (UK only) between 4 May and 7 September 2020. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between treatment type and risk-mitigating behaviour, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We characterized international variation in a mixed-effects model. Results: Of 3720 participants (2869 psoriasis, 851 RMDs) from 74 countries, 2262 (60·8%) reported the most stringent risk-mitigating behaviour (classified here under the umbrella term 'shielding'). A greater proportion of those receiving targeted therapies (biologics and Janus Kinase inhibitors) reported shielding compared with those receiving no systemic therapy [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·35-1·97]. The association between targeted therapy and shielding was preserved when standard systemic therapy was used as the reference group (OR 1·39, 95% CI 1·23-1·56). Shielding was associated with established risk factors for severe COVID-19 [male sex (OR 1·14, 95% CI 1·05-1·24), obesity (OR 1·37, 95% CI 1·23-1·54), comorbidity burden (OR 1·43, 95% CI 1·15-1·78)], a primary indication of RMDs (OR 1·37, 95% CI 1·27-1·48) and a positive anxiety or depression screen (OR 1·57, 95% CI 1·36-1·80). Modest differences in the proportion shielding were observed across nations. Conclusions: Greater risk-mitigating behaviour among people with IMIDs receiving targeted therapies may contribute to the reported lower risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The behaviour variation across treatment groups, IMIDs and nations reinforces the need for clear evidence-based patient communication on risk-mitigation strategies and may help inform updated public health guidelines as the pandemic continues.

Importance The emerging paradigm of treat-to-target in psoriasis requires accurate monitoring of treatment response. The commonly used physician global assessment tool does not capture the patient’s perception of their disease. Patient assessments facilitate shared decision-making and foster patient-centered care; however, recent research reports a discordance between patient- and physician-reported psoriasis severity. Understanding the factors underlying this discordance may improve treatment satisfaction and disease outcomes. Objectives To evaluate the discordance between patient- and physician-reported measures of psoriasis severity and assess the association with patient mental health status. Design, Setting, and Participants A cohort study using repeated cross-sectional analysis of real-world longitudinal data was conducted at a large specialist psoriasis service serving London and Southeast England. A total of 502 patients attending the psoriasis service between May 12, 2016, and November 1, 2018, were included. Data analysis was conducted July 22 to October 22, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Psoriasis severity was assessed on each visit with identical 5-point physician and patient global assessment scales (clear/nearly clear, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe). Each patient completed validated self-report screens for depression and anxiety on each visit. Results Longitudinal data from 502 individuals with psoriasis (1985 total observations) were available. A total of 339 patients (68%) were men, 396 (79%) were White, mean (SD) age was 47 (13) years, and 197 patients (39%) had concurrent psoriatic arthritis, 43 (9%) screened positive for depression, and 49 (10%) screened positive for anxiety. There was discordance between physician and patient measures of disease severity in 768 of 1985 office appointments (39%); on 511 visits (26%) patients rated their psoriasis as less severe and on 257 visits (13%) patients rated their psoriasis as more severe compared with their physician. Individuals who screened positive for depression or anxiety were more likely to overestimate their psoriasis severity compared with their physician (relative risk ratio: depression, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5; anxiety, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4). These findings remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, smoking, number of comorbidities, treatment modality, and presence of psoriatic arthritis. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that discordance between patient and physician assessments of psoriasis severity is associated with patients’ mental health status. Recognition of anxiety and depression in individuals with psoriasis appears to be important when interpreting patient-reported outcome measures and informing appropriate treatment decisions.

Background The multi-morbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes but data are limited. Objective Characterize the course of COVID-19 in psoriasis and identify factors associated with hospitalization. Methods Clinicians reported psoriasis patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 via an international registry, PsoProtect. Multiple logistic regression assessed the association between clinical/demographic characteristics and hospitalization. A separate patient-facing registry characterized risk-mitigating behaviours. Results Of 374 clinician-reported patients from 25 countries, 71% were receiving a biologic, 18% a non-biologic and 10% no systemic treatment for psoriasis. 348 (93%) fully recovered from COVID-19, 77 (21%) were hospitalized and nine (2%) died. Increased hospitalization risk was associated with older age (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.59 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.19-2.13), male sex (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23-5.12), non-white ethnicity (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.24-8.03) and comorbid chronic lung disease (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.52-9.83). Hospitalization was more frequent in patients using non-biologic systemic therapy than biologics (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.31-6.18). No significant differences were found between biologic classes. Independent patient-reported data (n=1,626 across 48 countries) suggested lower levels of social isolation in individuals receiving non-biologic systemic therapy compared to biologics (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.94). Conclusion In this international moderate-severe psoriasis case series, biologics use was associated with lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization than non-biologic systemic therapies, however further investigation is warranted due to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Established risk factors (being older, male, non-white ethnicity, comorbidities) were associated with higher hospitalization rates. Clinical Implications We identify risk factors for COVID-19-related hospitalization in psoriasis patients, including older age, male sex, non-white ethnicity and comorbidities. Use of biologics was associated with lower hospitalization risk than non-biologic systemic therapies., Capsule summary: In this global registry-based study, risk factors for COVID-19-related hospitalization in psoriasis patients were older age, male sex, non-white ethnicity and comorbidities. Use of biologics was associated with lower hospitalization risk than non-biologic systemic treatment.

Importance Treatments for psoriasis may be less effective in everyday practice than in clinical trials. Emulating a target trial using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) can provide treatment effect estimates that are robust and can inform both clinicians and regulatory bodies. Objectives To assess the comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab and secukinumab in patients with psoriasis, and to test whether the relative effectiveness estimate of the CLEAR trial, a randomized clinical trial that compared secukinumab with ustekinumab for psoriasis, can be replicated. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness research study used a target trial emulation approach and was performed between November 2007 and August 2019. Data were obtained from BADBIR, a multicenter longitudinal pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Participants had chronic plaque psoriasis, were 18 years or older, and had at least 1 record of a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 12 or higher before their initiation to secukinumab or ustekinumab. Propensity score (PS) 1:1 matched analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted analysis were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the risk ratio (RR) and the risk difference (RD) for achieving PASI of 2 or lower after 12 months of therapy for secukinumab compared with ustekinumab. Methods to account for missing outcome data were complete case analysis, nonresponder imputation, last observation carried forward, inverse probability of censoring weighting, and multiple imputation. Regulatory and estimate agreement metrics were used to benchmark the effect estimates in this study against those in the CLEAR trial. Results A total of 1231 patients were included in the analysis, with 917 receiving ustekinumab and 314 receiving secukinumab. Secukinumab was superior to ustekinumab in all analyses, except under the nonresponder imputation method, in the proportion of participants achieving a PASI of 2 or lower (PS-weighted complete case analysis: RR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.55]; RD, 11.9% [1.6-22.1]). All analyses, except for nonresponder imputation, reached regulatory agreement in both PS-matching and PS-weighted analyses. Conclusions and Relevance This comparative effectiveness study found that secukinumab resulted in more patients achieving a PASI of 2 or lower after 12 months of therapy compared with ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis. Target trial emulation in this study resulted in regulatory and estimate agreement with the CLEAR randomized clinical trial; further such studies may help fill the evidence gap when comparing other systemic therapies for psoriasis.

ObjectivesRegistry data suggest that people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving targeted systemic therapies have fewer adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared to patients receiving no systemic treatments. We used international patient survey data to explore the hypothesis that greater risk-mitigating behaviour in those receiving targeted therapies may account, at least in part, for this observation.MethodsOnline surveys were completed by individuals with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMD) (UK only) or psoriasis (globally) between 4th May and 7th September 2020. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between treatment type and risk-mitigating behaviour, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We characterised international variation in a mixed effects model.ResultsOf 3,720 participants (2,869 psoriasis, 851 RMD) from 74 countries, 2,262 (60.8%) reported the most stringent risk-mitigating behaviour (classified here under the umbrella term ‘shielding’). A greater proportion of those receiving targeted therapies (biologics and JAK inhibitors) reported shielding compared to those receiving no systemic therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.35-1.97) and standard systemic agents (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.56). Shielding was associated with established risk factors for severe COVID-19 (male sex [OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.24], obesity [OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.23-1.54], comorbidity burden [OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.78]), a primary indication of RMD (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48) and a positive anxiety or depression screen (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.36-1.80). Modest differences in the proportion shielding were observed across nations.ConclusionsGreater risk-mitigating behaviour among people with IMIDs receiving targeted therapies may contribute to the reported lower risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The behaviour variation across treatment groups, IMIDs and nations reinforces the need for clear evidence-based patient communication on risk mitigation strategies and may help inform updated public health guidelines as the pandemic continues.Key messagesWhat is already known about this subject?At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on targeted systemic immunosuppressive therapy were considered to be at higher risk of severe COVID-19. Subsequent registry data suggest that this may not the case.What does this study add?Here we characterise shielding behaviour in patients with IMIDs from a global survey. We identified that targeted systemic therapy associates with increased shielding behaviour, as do demographic risk factors for severe COVID-19 including male gender and obesity.Shielding behaviour varies across nations, albeit modestly when case-mix is taken into account.How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments?Variable shielding behaviour amongst patients with IMIDs may be an important confounder when considering differential COVID-19 risk between therapy types, so should be accounted for in analyses where possible.

Key Points Question Are clinical and demographic factors associated with the severity of palmoplantar pustulosis? Findings In a cross-sectional study of 203 patients in the UK, the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area Severity Index score was significantly higher in women compared with men and in current smokers vs former and never smokers. Both of these findings were replicated in an independently ascertained, Northern European cohort including 159 patients. Meaning The findings of this study suggest that smoking cessation interventions may be beneficial in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis and should be investigated in clinical studies., Importance Although palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) can significantly impact quality of life, the factors underlying disease severity have not been studied. Objective To examine the factors associated with PPP severity. Design, Setting, and Participants An observational, cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts was conducted. A UK data set including 203 patients was obtained through the Anakinra in Pustular Psoriasis, Response in a Controlled Trial (2016-2019) and its sister research study Pustular Psoriasis, Elucidating Underlying Mechanisms (2016-2020). A Northern European cohort including 193 patients was independently ascertained by the European Rare and Severe Psoriasis Expert Network (2014-2017). Patients had been recruited in secondary or tertiary dermatology referral centers. All patients were of European descent. The PPP diagnosis was established by dermatologists, based on clinical examination and/or published consensus criteria. The present study was conducted from October 1, 2014, to March 15, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, smoking status, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI), measuring severity from 0 (no sign of disease) to 72 (very severe disease), or Physician Global Assessment (PGA), measuring severity as 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). Results Among the 203 UK patients (43 men [21%], 160 women [79%]; median age at onset, 48 [interquartile range (IQR), 38-59] years), the PPPASI was inversely correlated with age of onset (r = −0.18, P = .01). Similarly, in the 159 Northern European patients who were eligible for inclusion in this analysis (25 men [16%], 134 women [84%]; median age at onset, 45 [IQR, 34-53.3] years), the median age at onset was lower in individuals with a moderate to severe PGA score (41 years [IQR, 30.5-52 years]) compared with those with a clear to mild PGA score (46.5 years [IQR, 35-55 years]) (P = .04). In the UK sample, the median PPPASI score was higher in women (9.6 [IQR, 3.0-16.2]) vs men (4.0 [IQR, 1.0-11.7]) (P = .01). Likewise, moderate to severe PPP was more prevalent among Northern European women (57 of 134 [43%]) compared with men (5 of 25 [20%]) (P = .03). In the UK cohort, the median PPPASI score was increased in current smokers (10.7 [IQR, 4.2-17.5]) compared with former smokers (7 [IQR, 2.0-14.4]) and nonsmokers (2.2 [IQR, 1-6]) (P = .003). Comparable differences were observed in the Northern European data set, as the prevalence of moderate to severe PPP was higher in former and current smokers (51 of 130 [39%]) compared with nonsmokers (6 of 24 [25%]) (P = .14). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that PPP severity is associated with early-onset disease, female sex, and smoking status. Thus, smoking cessation intervention might be beneficial., This cross-sectional study examines factors that may contribute to the severity of symptoms in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis.

Background The rapid expansion of psoriasis biologics has led to an urgent need to understand their relative efficacy and tolerability to inform treatment decisions better and, specifically, to inform guideline development. Objectives To update a 2017 meta‐analysis on the comparative efficacy and tolerability of biologic treatments for psoriasis. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published up to 7 September 2018, of 11 licensed, NICE‐approved biologics targeting tumour necrosis factor (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol), interleukin (IL)‐12/IL‐23p40 (ustekinumab), IL‐17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL‐17RA (brodalumab) and IL‐23p19 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab). A frequentist network meta‐analysis ascertained direct or indirect evidence comparing biologics with one another, methotrexate or placebo. This was combined with hierarchical cluster analyses to consider efficacy (≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) or Physician’s Global Assessment 0 or 1; PASI 75; Dermatology Life Quality Index improvement) and tolerability (drug withdrawal due to adverse events) outcomes at 10–16 weeks, followed by assessments of study quality, heterogeneity and inconsistency. Results We identified 62 RCTs presenting data on direct comparisons (31 899 participants). All biologics were efficacious compared with placebo or methotrexate at 10–16 weeks. Hierarchical cluster analyses revealed that adalimumab, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab and ustekinumab were comparable with respect to high short‐term efficacy and tolerability. Infliximab and ixekizumab clustered together, with high short‐term efficacy but relatively lower tolerability than the other agents, although the number of drug withdrawal events across the network was low, so these findings should be treated with caution. Conclusions Using our methodology we found that most biologics cluster together with respect to short‐term efficacy and tolerability, and we did not identify any single agent as ‘best’. These data need to be interpreted in the context of longer‐term efficacy, effectiveness data, safety, posology and drug acquisition costs when making treatment decisions.

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a progressive and often destructive joint disease affecting approximately 20% of people with psoriasis. Objectives: To investigate associations between obesity, changes in body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake and smoking status and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis. Methods: We undertook a cohort study involving incident cases of psoriasis identified from the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. The associations between smoking, alcohol and BMI and development of PsA were assessed using generalized additive models. Additionally, the risks associated with a change in BMI during follow-up were investigated using distributed lag nonlinear models. Results: We identified 90 189 incident cases of psoriasis (42% male, mean age 51 years), of whom 1409 had a subsequent record of PsA diagnosis. BMIs of 25·0–29·9, 30·0–34·9 and ≥ 35·0 kg m −2 were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing PsA compared with BMIs < 25·0 kg m −2: adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 1·79 (1·46–2·19), 2·10 (1·67–2·63) and 2·68 (2·09–3·43), respectively. Reducing BMI over a 10-year period (linearly) was associated with a reduction in the risk of developing PsA compared with BMI remaining constant over the same period. Increased risks of developing PsA were associated with moderate drinking but not with former or heavy drinking or with current or past smoking status. Conclusions: In this incident psoriasis cohort, increased BMI and moderate drinking, but not heavy drinking or smoking status, were associated with an increased risk of PsA in people with psoriasis. Importantly, we have shown that reducing weight may result in a reduction in the risk of developing PsA. What's already known about this topic?. There is some evidence that increased body mass index is associated with an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. There are conflicting results surrounding the relationship between smoking and the development of psoriatic arthritis among patients with psoriasis. What does this study add?. Using a nonlinear and lagged effect of body mass index measured over time we have shown that reducing body mass index may be associated with a reduction in the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. We have found no evidence that smoking alters the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Real-world biologic drug survival is an important proxy measure for effectiveness. Predictors of drug survival may help patients with psoriasis choose between biologic therapies.\ud \ud OBJECTIVES: (i) To assess the relative drug survival of adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab in patients with psoriasis. (ii) To investigate predictors of biologic drug survival. \ud \ud METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) between November 2007 and August 2019. We performed survival analysis and fitted a flexible parametric survival model for biologic discontinuation due to ineffectiveness. \ud \ud RESULTS: In total 9652 patients were included: 5543 starting on adalimumab (57·4%), 991 on secukinumab (10·3%) and 3118 on ustekinumab (32·3%). The overall drug survivals of adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab in year 1 were 0·78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·77-0·79], 0·88 (95% CI 0·86-0·91) and 0·88 (95% CI 0·87-0·89), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios (adjHRs) for discontinuation of adalimumab and secukinumab compared with ustekinumab were 2·11 (95% CI 1·76-2·54) and 0·67 (95% CI 0·40-1·11), respectively. The presence of psoriatic arthritis predicted for survival in the adalimumab and secukinumab cohorts (adjHR 0·67, 95% CI 0·51-0·88 and 0·70, 95% CI 0·40-1·24, respectively), but for discontinuation in the ustekinumab cohort (adjHR 1·42, 95% CI 1·12-1·81). Previous exposure to biologic therapies predicted for discontinuation in the ustekinumab and secukinumab cohorts (adjHR 1·54, 95% CI 1·26-1·89 and 1·49, 95% CI 0·91-2·45, respectively) and for survival in the adalimumab cohort (adjHR 0·71, 95% CI 0·55-0·92). \ud \ud CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab and ustekinumab have similar sustained drug survival, while adalimumab has a lower drug survival in patients with psoriasis. Psoriatic arthritis and previous biologic experience were predictors with differential effects between the biologic therapies. What is already known about this topic? There is conflicting evidence over the real-world drug survival of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis. Data from registries to date suggest that secukinumab has a lower drug survival than that reported from clinical trials. What does this study add? This study found that secukinumab and ustekinumab had similar sustained drug survival in the real world, while the drug survival of adalimumab was lower, suggesting that the real-world drug survival of secukinumab is higher than previously reported. We found that psoriatic arthritis and previous biologic experience had differential effects on drug discontinuation in the three biologic cohorts. These predictors may help patients and clinicians choose the most appropriate biologic therapy.

Background Current treatment options for Palmoplantar Pustulosis (PPP), a debilitating chronic skin disease which affects the hands and feet, are limited. The Anakinra for Pustular psoriasis: Response in a Controlled Trial (APRICOT) aims to determine the efficacy of anakinra in the treatment of PPP. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for the final analysis of this two-staged trial, which was determined prior to unblinding and database lock. This is an update to the published protocol and stage one analysis plan. Methods APRICOT is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of anakinra versus placebo, with two stages and an adaptive element. Stage one compared treatment arms to ensure proof-of-concept and determined the primary outcome for stage two of the trial. The primary outcome was selected to be the change in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes include other investigator-assessed efficacy measures of disease severity, participant-reported measures of efficacy and safety measures. This manuscript describes in detail the outcomes, sample size, general analysis principles, the pre-specified statistical analysis plan for each of the outcomes, the handling of missing outcome data and the planned sensitivity and supplementary analyses for the second stage of the APRICOT trial. Discussion This statistical analysis plan was developed in compliance with international trial guidelines and is published to increase transparency of the trial analysis. The results of the trial analysis will indicate whether anakinra has a role in the treatment of PPP. Trial registration ISCRTN, ISCRTN13127147. Registered on 1 August 2016. EudraCT Number 2015-003600-23. Registered on 1 April 2016.

TNF antagonist induced lupus is diagnosed upon a temporal relationship of TNF antagonist therapy and the development of four of the 11 American college of rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for lupus. We critically appraise the literature on TNF antagonist induced lupus, focusing on the diagnostic criteria, dermatological manifestations, management and outcome. Eighty cases of TNF antagonist induced lupus that met the ACR criteria were included and analysed. Infliximab was the most commonly reported agent (58.8%, n=47). Cutaneous manifestations were the most common presentation (67.5%, n=54,), specifically malar rash (26.3%, n=21) and photosensitivity (23.4%, n=19). Lupus symptoms resolved in all cases (n=80), withdrawal of the TNF antagonist was sufficient in 18.8% of cases (n=15), additional immunosuppression was required in the remaining cases. Four patients were treated with a second, different TNF antagonist, with no recurrence of symptoms. TNF antagonist induced lupus appears to have a good prognosis and treatment should be tailored to each individual case. As cutaneous features are the most common manifestation it is important that dermatologists are aware of the ACR diagnostic criteria of lupus to ensure accurate diagnoses of TNF antagonist induced lupus. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Key Points Question Is receipt of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor monotherapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared with other treatment regimens among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs)? Findings In this cohort study of 6077 patients with IMIDs and COVID-19, TNF inhibitors in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate monotherapy, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy, or Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy were each associated with significantly higher odds of hospitalization or death compared with TNF inhibitor monotherapy. Meaning This study’s findings support the continued use of TNF inhibitor monotherapy among individuals with IMIDs during the pandemic., Importance Although tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are widely prescribed globally because of their ability to ameliorate shared immune pathways across immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), the impact of COVID-19 among individuals with IMIDs who are receiving TNF inhibitors remains insufficiently understood. Objective To examine the association between the receipt of TNF inhibitor monotherapy and the risk of COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death compared with other commonly prescribed immunomodulatory treatment regimens among adult patients with IMIDs. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was a pooled analysis of data from 3 international COVID-19 registries comprising individuals with rheumatic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis from March 12, 2020, to February 1, 2021. Clinicians directly reported COVID-19 outcomes as well as demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals with IMIDs and confirmed or suspected COVID-19 using online data entry portals. Adults (age ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or psoriasis were included. Exposures Treatment exposure categories included TNF inhibitor monotherapy (reference treatment), TNF inhibitors in combination with methotrexate therapy, TNF inhibitors in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate monotherapy, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy, and Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitor monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death. Registry-level analyses and a pooled analysis of data across the 3 registries were conducted using multilevel multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and accounting for country, calendar month, and registry-level correlations. Results A total of 6077 patients from 74 countries were included in the analyses; of those, 3215 individuals (52.9%) were from Europe, 3563 individuals (58.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 48.8 (16.5) years. The most common IMID diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (2146 patients [35.3%]) and Crohn disease (1537 patients [25.3%]). A total of 1297 patients (21.3%) were hospitalized, and 189 patients (3.1%) died. In the pooled analysis, compared with patients who received TNF inhibitor monotherapy, higher odds of hospitalization or death were observed among those who received a TNF inhibitor in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.17-2.58; P = .006), azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.61; P = .001), methotrexate monotherapy (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.57-2.56; P, This cohort study uses data from 3 international registries to examine the association between the receipt of tumor necrosis factor monotherapy and the risk of COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death among adult patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Summary Background Evidence of the comparative effectiveness of biological therapies for psoriasis on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in routine clinical practice is limited. Objectives To examine the comparative effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab on HRQoL in patients with psoriasis, and to identify potential predictors for improved HRQoL. Methods This was a prospective cohort study in which changes in HRQoL were assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQoL‐5D (EQ‐5D) at 6 and 12 months. Multivariable regression models were developed to identify factors associated with achieving a DLQI of 0/1 and improvements in the EQ‐5D utility score. Results In total, 2152 patients with psoriasis were included, with 1239 patients on adalimumab, 517 on etanercept and 396 on ustekinumab; 81% were biologic naïve. For the entire cohort, the median (interquartile range) DLQI and EQ‐5D improved from 18 (13–24) and 0·73 (0·69–0·80) at baseline to 2 (0–7) and 0·85 (0·69–1·00) at 6 months, respectively (P < 0·001). Similar improvements were achieved at 12 months. At 12 months, multivariable regression modelling showed that female sex, multiple comorbidities, smoking and a higher DLQI or a lower EQ‐5D utility score at baseline predicted a lower likelihood of achieving a DLQI of 0/1 or improvement in the EQ‐5D. Compared with adalimumab, patients receiving etanercept, but not ustekinumab, were less likely to achieve a DLQI of 0/1. There was no significant difference between the biological therapies in EQ‐5D improvement. Conclusions In routine clinical practice biological therapies produce marked improvement in HRQoL, which is influenced by the choice of biological therapy, baseline impairment in HRQoL, lifestyle characteristics and comorbidities. These findings should help inform selection of optimal biological therapy for patients related to improvements in HRQoL., What's already known about this topic? Evidence of the comparative effectiveness of biological therapies for psoriasis on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in routine clinical practice is limited.Earlier observational studies were either cross‐sectional, thereby limiting the ability to compare changes in HRQoL, or cohort studies that have not taken into account important clinical factors that could influence treatment response, such as alterations in dosing regimens of biological therapies and the concomitant use of conventional systemic treatments for psoriasis. What does this study add? This large prospective cohort study found that in routine clinical practice, the use of biological therapies for psoriasis was associated with marked improvements in HRQoL over 12 months.These improvements were influenced by the choice of biological therapy, baseline impairment in HRQoL, lifestyle characteristics and comorbidities.Compared with adalimumab, patients receiving etanercept were less likely to achieve a DLQI of 0/1, but there was no significant difference between ustekinumab and adalimumab in the proportion of patients achieving a DLQI of 0/1.There was no significant difference between the three biological therapies in level of improvement in the EQ‐5D. Linked Comment: Finlay. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1164–1165.

Chronic liver disease is a growing problem worldwide due to obesity, alcohol-related liver disease and viral hepatitis. Liver fibrosis is generally asymptomatic and patients may not present until they have advanced cirrhosis, when the scope for reversibility is limited. Identification of asymptomatic individuals at an early stage is fundamental to reversing the rising toll of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Awareness of liver disease and the techniques for diagnosis is important for dermatologists, not only due to the burden of disease in the general population but also because some dermatology cohorts may have an elevated risk. For example, there is an increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome and excess alcohol use in those with psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. In isolation, standard liver function tests lack sensitivity to detect advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and are of limited value. Traditionally diagnosis has relied on liver biopsy, which remains the gold standard but is both costly and invasive. There have been several recent advances in the development of noninvasive alternatives. These include scoring systems combining clinical and conventional laboratory parameters for use as screening tools, direct serum biomarkers of fibrogenesis and tissue elastography using both ultrasound (Fibroscan) and magnetic resonance. This review summarizes current and future noninvasive diagnostic techniques for evaluation of liver fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment modifications, including dose-escalations, dose-reductions, switches, discontinuations and restarts of biologics may be necessary in the management of psoriasis but the patterns of usage are incompletely defined.OBJECTIVES: To examine the treatment utilisation patterns of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab among biologic-naïve and non-naïve psoriasis patients enrolled in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR).METHOD: The cohort study included adults with chronic plaque psoriasis who were followed-up for ≥12-months.Treatment modifications were assessed during the first year of therapy. The time-trend method, comparing the cumulative dose (CD) patients received to the recommended cumulative dose (RCD), was used to assess dosing patterns. Concomitant use of other systemic treatments was also examined.RESULTS: In total, 2980 patients (adalimumab:1675; etanercept:996; ustekinumab:309) were included; 79.2% were biologic-naïve. Over 12-months, 77.4% of patients continued the biologic, 2.6% restarted therapy after a break of ≥90-days, 2.5% discontinued, and 17.5% switched biologic therapy. Most patients (85.7%) received the RCD of the biologic, although 8.1% were exposed to a higher CD. In total, 749(25.1%) patients used conventional systemic therapies concomitantly with a biologic at some stage; methotrexate was used most commonly (458;61.2%). Of those using combination therapy, 454(60.6%) continued the use of the conventional systemic therapy for >120 days after the start of the biologic.CONCLUSION: More than one-third of patients experienced treatment modifications within the first year of initiating a biologic. Conventional systemic therapies, particularly methotrexate, were commonly used concurrently which should be considered when evaluating treatment response and adverse events to biologics in real-world observational studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

SummaryBackground National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance recommends assessment of psychological and social well-being in people with psoriasis. Objectives To screen systematically for depression and anxiety in patients with psoriasis in routine clinical practice and to identify at-risk groups for psychiatric morbidity. Methods Consecutive patients attending a single, tertiary centre over a 10-month period were invited to complete the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as part of IMPARTS: Integrating Mental and Physical Healthcare: Research, Training and Services. Information on demographics, treatment and clinical disease severity was collated from electronic patient records. Regression models were used to identify at-risk groups for psychiatric morbidity. Results Of 607 patients included (56·2% on biologics), 9·9% (95% confidence interval 7·5–12·3%) screened positive for major depressive disorder (MDD) and 13·1% (79/604) (95% confidence interval 10·4–15·8%) for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; GAD-7 score > 9). Suicidal ideation was reported in 35% of those with MDD; DLQI was < 10 in 38·3% and 45·6% cases of MDD and GAD, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, the risk of MDD or GAD was significantly higher in women and those with severe clinical disease, psoriatic arthritis and previous depression/anxiety. The risk of GAD was significantly increased with Asian ethnicity and use of topical treatments only. Conclusions Systematic screening for anxiety and depression identifies clinically important levels of depression and anxiety that may be missed using DLQI data alone. Women and those with severe disease, psoriatic arthritis and/or a prior history of psychiatric morbidity may be at particular risk.

Importance: High-cost biologic therapies have transformed the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. To optimize outcomes and reduce costs, dose adjustment informed by measurement of circulating drug levels has been shown to be effective in various settings. However, limited evidence exists for this approach with the interleukin 12 and interleukin 23 inhibitor ustekinumab.\ud \ud Objective: To evaluate clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis.\ud \ud Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective observational cohort of 491 adults with psoriasis was recruited to the multicenter Biomarkers of Systemic Treatment Outcomes in Psoriasis study within the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register from June 2009 to December 2017; samples from some patients were taken between 2009 and 2011 as part of a pilot study with the same inclusion criteria.\ud \ud Exposure: Serum ustekinumab level measured at any point during the dosing cycle using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.\ud \ud Main Outcomes and Measures: Disease activity measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. Treatment response outcomes were PASI75 (75% reduction in PASI score from baseline [primary outcome]), PASI90 (90% reduction of PASI score from baseline), and absolute PASI score of 1.5 or less.\ud \ud Results: A total of 491 patients (171 women and 320 men; mean [SD] age, 45.7 [12.8] years) had 1 or more serum samples (total, 853 samples obtained 0-56 weeks from start of treatment) and 1 or more PASI scores within the first year of treatment. Antidrug antibodies were detected in only 17 of 490 patients (3.5%). Early measured drug levels (1-12 weeks after starting treatment) were associated with PASI75 response 6 months after starting treatment (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71) when adjusted for baseline PASI score, age, and ustekinumab dose. However, this finding was not consistent across the other PASI outcomes (PASI90 and PASI score of ≤1.5).\ud \ud Conclusions and Relevance: This real-world study provides evidence that measurement of early serum ustekinumab levels could be useful to direct the treatment strategy for psoriasis. Adequate drug exposure early in the treatment cycle may be particularly important in determining clinical outcome.

Background The 'treat to target' paradigm improves outcomes and reduces costs in chronic disease management but is not yet established in psoriasis. Objectives To identify treatment targets in psoriasis using two common measures of disease activity: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Methods Data from a multicentre longitudinal U.K. cohort of patients with psoriasis receiving systemic or biologic therapies (British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register, BADBIR) were used to identify absolute PASI thresholds for 90% (PASI 90) and 75% (PASI 75) improvements in baseline disease activity, using receiver operating characteristic curves. The relationship between PGA (clear, almost clear, mild, moderate, moderate-severe, severe) and PASI (range 0-72) was described, and the concordance between absolute and relative definitions of response was determined. The same approach was used to establish treatment response and eligibility definitions based on PGA. Results Data from 13 422 patients were available (58% male, 91% white ethnicity, mean age 44·9 years), including over 23 000 longitudinal PASI and PGA scores. An absolute PASI ≤ 2 was concordant with PASI 90 and an absolute PASI ≤ 4 was concordant with PASI 75 in 90% and 88% of cases, respectively. These findings were robust to subgroups of timing of assessment, baseline disease severity and treatment modality. PASI and PGA were strongly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0·92). The median PASI increased from 0 (interquartile range 0-0, range 0-23) to 19 (interquartile range 15-25, range 0-64) for PGA clear to severe, respectively. PGA clear/almost clear was concordant with PASI ≤ 2 in 90% of cases, and PGA moderate-severe severe was concordant with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence PASI eligibility criteria for biologics in 81% of cases. Conclusions An absolute PASI ≤ 2 and PGA clear/almost clear represent relevant disease end points to inform treat-to-target management strategies in psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? The most commonly used relative disease activity measure in psoriasis is ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90); however, it has several limitations including dependency on a baseline severity assessment. Defining an absolute target disease activity end point in psoriasis has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs, as demonstrated by treat-to-target approaches in other chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a popular alternative measure of psoriasis severity in daily practice; however, its utility has not been formally assessed with respect to PASI. What does this study add? An absolute PASI ≤ 2 corresponds with PASI 90 response and is a relevant disease end point for treat-to-target approaches in psoriasis. There is a strong correlation between PASI and PGA. PGA moderate-severe/severe may serve as an alternative eligibility criterion for biologics to PASI-based definitions, and PGA clear/almost clear is an appropriate alternative absolute treatment end point. What are the clinical implications of this work? Absolute PASI ≤ 2 and PGA clear/almost clear represent relevant disease end points to inform treat-to-target management strategies in psoriasis.

Importance Advanced liver fibrosis is a precursor to cirrhosis, a leading cause of mortality. People with severe psoriasis are at risk for liver disease, but our understanding of advanced fibrosis in individuals with psoriasis is limited. Objectives To describe the prevalence of and evaluate the clinical factors associated with advanced liver fibrosis in people with severe psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants The Co-morbidities in Severe Psoriasis study, a prospective observational cohort study in a large center serving London and Southeast England, was conducted from October 18, 2012, to April 2, 2015; 400 adults with severe psoriasis (Psoriasis Area Severity Index score, ≥10) were recruited from outpatient clinics. Statistical analysis was conducted from October 2, 2016, to March 3, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis determined by transient elastography, a noninvasive criterion standard test. Clinical factors evaluated included psoriasis-specific and metabolic indices, alcohol use, and methotrexate exposure. Results Of 400 patients recruited (108 women and 289 men; mean [SD] age, 49.5 [13] years), 333 had a successful transient elastography scan and were included in final analysis. Forty-seven patients (14.1%; 95% CI, 10.4%-17.9%) had advanced liver fibrosis as diagnosed by transient elastography. The clinical factors that produced the best-fit model for advanced fibrosis were central obesity (waist circumference), insulin resistance, aspartate aminotransferase level, platelet count, psoriasis disease severity, and reduced alcohol use (R2 = 0.54). Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this study suggest that advanced fibrosis is common in severe psoriasis. Abdominal obesity (by waist circumference) and insulin resistance were associated with the presence of advanced fibrosis. Longitudinal work to characterize the hepatic sequelae of central obesity, insulin resistance, and inflammation as well as the influence of systemic drugs (methotrexate and biologics) will inform future personalized therapeutic decision-making. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02174367

CLINICAL QUESTION Does weight loss reduce the severity and incidence of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in obese individuals? BACKGROUND Obesity presents a rising public health challenge and is more prevalent among individuals with psoriasis or PsA than in the general population. Longitudinal population-based studies suggest a causal role for obesity in psoriasis and PsA onset and that obesity drives greater disease severity. METHODS We systematically reviewed evidence within the MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases and clinical trials registries examining lifestyle, pharmacological and surgical weight loss interventions in the treatment and prevention of psoriasis and PsA in obese individuals. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models, followed by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Of 176 full-text articles reviewed, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of six randomized control trials (RCTs) confirmed that weight loss following lifestyle interventions (diet or physical activity) improves psoriasis compared with control [mean change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index -2·59, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4·09 to -1·09; P < 0·001]. One RCT demonstrated a greater likelihood of achieving minimal PsA activity following diet-induced weight loss (odds ratio 4·20, 95% CI 1·82-9·66; P < 0·001). Three studies of pharmacological treatments reported conflicting results, and no RCTs of bariatric surgery were identified. Two cohort studies suggested that bariatric surgery, particularly gastric bypass, reduces the risk of developing psoriasis (hazard ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·33-0·81; P < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS These limited data indicate that weight loss can improve pre-existing psoriasis and PsA, and prevent the onset of psoriasis in obese individuals. Together with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence obesity guidance, this informed a local obesity screening and management pathway, providing multidisciplinary weight loss interventions alongside conventional skin-focused care for patients with psoriasis.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be successfully treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, including the monoclonal antibody adalimumab. Once in remission, a proportion of patients can successfully discontinue treatment, indicating that blocking TNF is no longer required for disease control. To explore the dynamics of circulating TNF during adalimumab treatment, we developed a competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that can quantify TNF in the presence of large amounts of TNF inhibitor, i.e., a “drug-tolerant” assay. In 193 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with RA, we demonstrated that circulating TNF increased in average of >50-fold upon treatment and reached a stable concentration in time for most patients. A similar increase in TNF was found in 30 healthy volunteers after one dose of adalimumab. This implies that TNF in circulation during anti-TNF treatment is not primarily associated with disease activity. During treatment, TNF was in complex with adalimumab and could be recovered as inactive 3:1 adalimumab-TNF complexes. No quantitative association was found between TNF and adalimumab concentrations. Low TNF concentrations at week 4 were associated with a higher frequency of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) at subsequent time points, less frequent methotrexate use at baseline, and less frequent remission after 52 weeks. Also in healthy volunteers, early low TNF concentrations are associated with ADAs. In conclusion, longitudinal TNF concentrations are mostly stable during adalimumab treatment and may therefore not predict successful treatment discontinuation. However, early low TNF is strongly associated with ADA formation and may be used as timely predictor of nonresponse toward adalimumab treatment.

Background The persistence and effectiveness of systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in current clinical practice are poorly characterized. Objectives To systematically review observational studies investigating the persistence and effectiveness of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters (FAE) and methotrexate, involving at least 100 adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, exposed to therapy for ≥ 3 months. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PubMed were searched from 1 January 2007 to 1 November 2017 for observational studies reporting on persistence (therapy duration or the proportion of patients discontinuing therapy during follow-up) or effectiveness [improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) or Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)]. This review was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018099771. Results Of 411 identified studies, eight involving 4624 patients with psoriasis were included. Variations in the definitions and analyses of persistence and effectiveness outcomes prevented a meta-analysis from being conducted. One prospective multicentre study reported drug survival probabilities of 23% (ciclosporin), 42% (acitretin) and 50% (methotrexate) at 1 year. Effectiveness outcomes were not reported for either acitretin or ciclosporin. The persistence and effectiveness of FAE and methotrexate were better characterized, but mean discontinuation times ranged from 28 to 50 months for FAE and 7·7 to 22·3 months for methotrexate. At 12 months of follow-up, three studies reported that 76% (FAE), 53% (methotrexate) and 59% (methotrexate) of patients achieved ≥ 75% reduction in PASI, and one reported that 76% of FAE-exposed patients achieved a markedly improved or clear PGA. Conclusions The comparative persistence and effectiveness of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAE and methotrexate in real-world clinical practice in the past decade cannot be well described due to the inconsistency of the methods used.

Background:The number of immune-modulatory drugs used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) has exponentially increased in recent decades. While effective in controlling disease, serious infection remains a concern.Accurate information on immune-modulatory drugs, including infections, is required to guide prescribing decisions. The “summary of product characteristics” (SmPC) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) provides a useful repository of information on adverse events e.g. infections, from clinical trials and post-marketing pharmacovigilance (1).To date, no comparison has been undertaken on reported infection frequencies across SmPCs for immune-modulators.Objectives:To compare infection frequency, site and type across the most commonly-prescribed immune-modulatory drugs used to treat IMIDs, using information provided by SmPCs.Methods:A drug was included if licensed in Europe for treatment of one of the following: rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, connective tissue disease, autoimmune vasculitis, autoinflammatory syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis), psoriasis, multiple sclerosis and other rarer conditions.The Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC) was searched for commonly prescribed immune-modulatory drugs used for the above indications. SmPC documents were manually searched for information on infection frequency, extracted from sections 4.4 and 4.8. Infection frequency was recorded as per convention in the SmPC: very common (≥1/10); common (≥1/100 to 25% of included SmPCs were screened and extracted by a second reviewer. Disagreements were resolved with input from a third reviewer.Results:In total, 39 drugs were included, used across 20 indications: nine conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), six targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs; four Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors, two sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators) and 24 biologic DMARDs (17 cytokine-targeted; seven cell-targeted).Twelve sites of infection were recorded. Minimal or no site information was available for most csDMARDs and siponimod, certolizumab pegol and rituximab. The most common sites of infection are listed by drug group in Figure 1. Upper respiratory tract was the most common site, especially with bDMARDs. Lower respiratory, ear/nose/throat (including sinusitis) and urinary tract infections were moderately common, with clustering within drug groups. No drugs reported risk of cardiac infections; the eye, musculoskeletal, neurological, oral and reproductive sites were the least commonly-reported sites of infection.Infection data for 27 distinct pathogens were recorded, the majority viruses, especially with bDMARD use. Herpes simplex and zoster were the most frequently listed (mainly with bDMARDs and tsDMARDs), followed by influenza. Common non-viral causes of infection were candida and tinea species.Variable or absent reporting was noted for opportunistic infections (e.g. tuberculosis and fungi) and certain high-prevalence viruses e.g. Epstein-Barr.Conclusion:The SmPC literature reports differences in infection risk, by site and pathogen, between immune-modulatory drugs. The findings can be used to visualise differences and aid treatment decisions. However, some of the patterns we have shown lack face-validity to clinicians familiar with real-world safety data. The data fail to capture risk of rare infections, are likely skewed by trial selection criteria, varying number of trials per drug and quirks of individual study-reporting methodologies.The findings highlight the need for robust post-marketing pharmacovigilance studies.References:[1]A Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics Module 1.3. 2008.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of serious infections in biologic therapies for psoriasis is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting serious infections in people taking any licensed biologic therapy for psoriasis compared with those taking placebo, nonbiologic therapy, or other biologic therapies. The quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. No significant heterogeneity was detected in data from 32 RCTs (n = 13,359 participants) and one cohort study (n = 4,993 participants). In adults, low- to very-low-quality RCT data showed no significant difference between any biologic therapy and placebo at weeks 12–16 (overall pooled Peto odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.36–1.41) and weeks 20–30 (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.45–11.49). No significant differences were found in any of the other comparisons in underpowered RCT data. Prospective cohort study data of low quality suggests that only adalimumab (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.47–4.32) was associated with a significantly higher risk of serious infection compared with retinoid and/or phototherapy in adults. No association between biologic therapies and serious infections in patients with psoriasis who were eligible for RCTs was detected. Further observational studies are needed to inform the uncertainty around this risk in the real world.

SOURCE CITATION Lebwohl MG, Papp KA, Stein Gold L, et al. Trial of roflumilast cream for chronic plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:229-39. 32668113.

This randomized clinical trial of patients previously treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis assesses the efficacy of different dupilumab regimens in maintaining response after 16 weeks of initial treatment. Importance The dupilumab regimen of 300 mg every 2 weeks is approved for uncontrolled, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of different dupilumab regimens in maintaining response after 16 weeks of initial treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants The Study to Confirm the Efficacy and Safety of Different Dupilumab Dose Regimens in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis (LIBERTY AD SOLO-CONTINUE) was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from March 25, 2015, to October 18, 2016, at 185 sites in North America, Europe, Asia, and Japan. Patients with moderate to severe AD who received dupilumab treatment and achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 or 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores (EASI-75) at week 16 in 2 previous dupilumab monotherapy trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and 2) were rerandomized in SOLO-CONTINUE. After completing SOLO-CONTINUE, patients were followed up for up to 12 weeks or enrolled in an open-label extension. Data were analyzed from December 5 to 12, 2016. Interventions High-responding patients treated with dupilumab in SOLO were rerandomized 2:1:1:1 to continue their original regimen of dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly or every 2 weeks or to receive dupilumab, 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks or placebo for 36 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Percentage change in EASI score from baseline during the SOLO-CONTINUE trial, percentage of patients with EASI-75 at week 36, and safety. Results Among the 422 patients (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [14.5] years; 227 [53.8%] male), continuing dupilumab treatment once weekly or every 2 weeks maintained optimal efficacy, with negligible change in percent EASI improvement from SOLO 1 and 2 baseline during the SOLO-CONTINUE trial (-0.06%; P < .001 vs placebo); percent change with the other regimens dose-dependently worsened (dupilumab every 4 weeks, -3.84%; dupilumab every 8 weeks, -6.84%; placebo, -21.67%). More patients taking dupilumab weekly or every 2 weeks (116 of 162 [71.6%]; P < .001 vs placebo) maintained EASI-75 response than those taking dupilumab every 4 weeks (49 of 84 [58.3%]) or every 8 weeks (45 of 82 [54.9%]) or those taking placebo (24 of 79 [30.4%]). Overall adverse event incidences were 70.7% in the weekly or every 2 weeks group, 73.6% in the every 4 weeks group, 75.0% in the every 8 weeks group, and 81.7% in the placebo group. Treatment groups had similar conjunctivitis rates. Treatment-emergent antidrug antibody incidence was lower with more frequent dupilumab dose regimens (11.3% in the placebo group and 11.7%, 6.0%, 4.3%, and 1.2% in the dupilumab every 8 weeks, every 4 weeks, every 2 weeks, and weekly groups, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance In this trial, continued response over time was most consistently maintained with dupilumab administered weekly or every 2 weeks. Longer dosage intervals and placebo resulted in a diminution of response for both continuous and categorical end points. No new safety signals were observed. The approved regimen of 300 mg of dupilumab every 2 weeks is recommended for long-term treatment. Question Do dupilumab regimens less frequent than once weekly or every 2 weeks maintain long-term efficacy and safety? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 422 patients, high-responding patients previously treated for 16 weeks with 300 mg of dupilumab weekly or every 2 weeks who continued those regimens had the most consistent efficacy; patients taking lower-dose regimens (every 4 or 8 weeks) or placebo had a dose-dependent reduction in response and no safety advantage. Meaning The approved regimen (every 2 weeks) maintained clinical response and is therefore recommended for long-term treatment.

Background: Tumor necrosis factor- (TNF) inhibitors are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); these include adalimumab, which binds TNF to form inactive complexes. Once in remission, a proportion of patients can successfully discontinue adalimumab treatment, indicating that blocking TNF is no longer necessary for disease control. We developed a novel assay that can quantify TNF in the presence of large amounts of TNF-inhibitor, i.e. a ‘drug-tolerant’ assay. Objectives: To investigate, for the first time, the relationship between TNF levels and disease course during adalimumab treatment. Methods: The new drug-tolerant competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay was used to quantify TNF levels on initiation and during 2 years of adalimumab treatment in 206 consecutive RA patients. The relationship between TNF levels and clinical response was evaluated. Results: Circulating TNF levels were close to the detection limit at baseline, but TNF levels increased on average >50-fold upon adalimumab treatment (figure 1A; black lines show median (IQR)), and reached a stable level in time in the majority of patients (figure 1B; representatives of n=206), regardless of disease activity. During treatment, TNF was in complex with adalimumab, and recovered as inactive 3:1 adalimumab:TNF complexes. Low TNF levels at week four were associated with a higher frequency of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) at subsequent time points (figure 1C) and significantly less methotrexate (MTX) use at baseline. Furthermore, week four TNF levels were significantly correlated with SDAI score, with significantly lower TNF levels in patients who did not reach remission (Spearman r = -0.18; p=0.015; figure 1D) Conclusions: TNF levels, mostly in complexed form, do not appear to decline in patients that reach remission, and may therefore not be predictive for treatment discontinuation. However, low complexed TNF levels in the early phase of treatment (wk 4) are strongly associated with ADA formation and can be used to identify non-responders in the early phase of treatment. Disclosure of Interest: L. Berkhout: None declared, M. l9Ami: None declared, J. Ruwaard: None declared, M. Hart: None declared, P. Ooijevaar-de Heer: None declared, K. Bloem: None declared, M. Nurmohamed Consultant for: Abbott, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, SOBI, BMS, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Roche, Pfizer, R. van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant for: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, M. Boers: None declared, C. Smith: None declared, G. Wolbink Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, T. Rispens Grant/research support from: Genmab, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, AbbVie, Regeneron

Importance: Patients with psoriasis enrolled in clinical trials of biologics may not be representative of the real-world population. There is evidence that patients ineligible for such trials have a greater risk of serious adverse events (SAEs), but the effect on drug discontinuation and effectiveness are unknown.Objective: To determine whether (1) drug discontinuation, (2) effectiveness, and (3) rates of SAEs differ in patients with psoriasis categorized as eligible or ineligible for clinical trials.Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational study using 157 dermatology centers in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland was carried out wherein we applied the eligibility criteria of clinical trials of biologic therapies for psoriasis to patients who were being followed up in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) and being prescribed biologics as part of standard clinical care. Patients with psoriasis registered to BADBIR who were taking etanercept (enbrel only; n = 1509), adalimumab (n = 4000), and ustekinumab (n = 1627) with at least 1 follow-up visit. Eligibility criteria were extracted from phase 3 licensing trials for etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Patients in BADBIR with a missing baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) or baseline PASI value less than 10 (etanercept) or less than 12 (adalimumab; ustekinumab) but who would otherwise be eligible were investigated separately. Eligibility categories applied to BADBIR included: eligible, ineligible, insufficient baseline PASI only, and missing baseline PASI only.Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Drug discontinuation: cumulative incidence at 12 months by stop reason per eligibility category and drug; (2) effectiveness: linear regression of absolute change in PASI from baseline to 6 and 12 months; and (3) SAEs: incidence rate ratio (IRR) at 12 months between eligibility categories per drug.Results: The mean (SD) age of the 7136 patients included in the analysis was 45 (13) years and 2924 (41%) were women and 4212 (59%) were men. Of 7136 patients, 839 (56%) etanercept, 2219 (56%) adalimumab, and 754 (46%) ustekinumab registrations were categorized as eligible. The most common reasons for ineligibility were diabetes (etanercept, 143 [9%]; ustekinumab, 201 [12%]) and nonchronic plaque psoriasis (adalimumab, 157 [4%]). Patients categorized as ineligible (etanercept, 367 [24%]; adalimumab, 282 [7%]; ustekinumab, 394 [24%]) achieved a smaller absolute change in PASI after 6 and 12 months (adalimumab, ustekinumab), and had significantly higher rates of SAEs compared with the eligible category (etanercept: IRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.6; adalimumab: IRR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.6; ustekinumab: IRR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.1-3.8). No significant differences in drug discontinuation were observed between categories.Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical trial effectiveness and safety outcomes are not representative of real-world patients in BADBIR patients categorized as ineligible for such trials.

Aim Warren et al. set out to assess the effect of an intensified dosing schedule of subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Setting and design This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized (3 : 1), placebo-controlled study, conducted across 16 centres in Germany, France, the Netherlands and the U.K. Study exposure Methotrexate-naive adults with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months before baseline were randomly assigned to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of either methotrexate at a starting dose of 17·5 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks (first phase). Dose escalation to 22·5 mg per week was implemented after 8 weeks if patients did not achieve ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50). Treatment was combined with folic acid 5 mg per week. The first phase of the study was followed by an open-label period from 16 to 52 weeks (second phase), in which both groups received weekly methotrexate injections. At week 24, dose escalation to 22·5 mg per week was possible in patients not achieving PASI 50. Outcomes Psoriasis severity was measured using PASI. The authors also used two other psoriasis severity measures and two quality-of-life measures, looked at safety indices and performed a substudy analysing paired skin biopsies at baseline and week 16 (histopathology, immunohistochemistry and expression of interleukin-17A, interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α). Primary outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching PASI 75 at week 16. Results In total 120 patients were included in this trial, most of whom were middle-aged white men with long-standing psoriasis, and the mean body mass index was 30·1 kg m-2 . PASI 75 was achieved in 41% of patients receiving methotrexate vs. 10% of patients receiving placebo (relative risk 3·93, 95% confidence interval 1·31-11·81; P = 0·0026) at week 16. Subcutaneous methotrexate was generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to this treatment over the 52-week study. Conclusion Warren et al. conclude that the 52-week risk-benefit profile of subcutaneous methotrexate is favourable in patients with psoriasis.

BackgroundBiological therapies are highly effective in psoriasis, but have profound effects on innate and adaptive immune pathways that may negatively impact on cancer immunosurveillance mechanisms.ObjectivesTo investigate the risk of cancer in patients with psoriasis treated with biological therapy.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (up to August 2016) for randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies and systematic reviews that reported cancer incidence in people exposed to biological therapy for psoriasis compared with a control population.ResultsEight prospective cohort studies met our inclusion criteria. All the evidence reviewed related to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) with the exception of one study on ustekinumab. An increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), particularly squamous cell carcinoma, was reported with TNFi compared with both a general United States population and a rheumatoid arthritis population treated with TNFi. No evidence for increased risk of cancers (reported as all cancers, lymphoma, melanoma, prostate, colorectal and breast cancer) other than NMSC was identified.ConclusionsThere were important limitations to the studies identified including choice of comparator arms, inadequate adjustment for confounding factors and failure to account for latency periods of cancer. There remains a need for ongoing pharmacovigilance in relation to cancer risk and biological therapy; the NMSC signal requires further investigation to determine the risk specifically attributable to biological therapy using prospectively collected data with adjustment for known NMSC risk factors.

Background The British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) is a prospective, observational cohort designed to assess the long-term safety of biologic and conventional systemic therapies used for adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the U.K. and Republic of Ireland. Objectives To describe the demographics, disease severity and comorbidities of patients with psoriasis on enrolment into BADBIR, and to highlight differences in those commencing biologics compared with those on conventional systemic therapies. Methods Baseline data were collected from 151 dermatology departments in the U.K. and Republic of Ireland. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results As of August 2014, 8399 patients were registered with BADBIR; 5065 (60%) received biologics, of whom 52·8% received adalimumab, 24·6% etanercept, 18·7% ustekinumab and 3·9% infliximab. In the comparator cohort 44·1% received methotrexate, 23·1% ciclosporin, 18·0% acitretin and 7·6% fumaric acid esters. Overall 4897 (58%) were male. Patients on biologics had a higher mean ± SD age and disease duration than patients on conventional systemic therapies (46·3 ± 12·7 vs. 44·3 ± 14·3 years and 23·0 ± 12·6 vs. 19·0 ± 13·4 years, respectively; both P Conclusions BADBIR is an invaluable resource to study the safety and effectiveness of both biologic and conventional systemic therapies. Understanding differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts is crucial in undertaking future pharmacovigilance studies.

Psoriasis has been linked to cardiometabolic diseases, but epidemiological findings are inconsistent. We investigated the association between psoriasis and cardiometabolic outcomes in a German cross-sectional study ( n =4,185) and a prospective cohort of German Health Insurance beneficiaries ( n =1,811,098). A potential genetic overlap was explored using genome-wide data from >22,000 coronary artery disease and >4,000 psoriasis cases, and with a dense genotyping study of cardiometabolic risk loci on 927 psoriasis cases and 3,717 controls. After controlling for major confounders, in the cross-sectional analysis psoriasis was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D, adjusted odds ratio (OR)=2.36; 95% confidence interval CI=1.26–4.41) and myocardial infarction (MI, OR=2.26; 95% CI=1.03–4.96). In the longitudinal study, psoriasis slightly increased the risk for incident T2D (adjusted relative risk (RR)=1.11; 95% CI=1.08–1.14) and MI (RR=1.14; 95% CI=1.06–1.22), with highest risk increments in systemically treated psoriasis, which accounted for 11 and 17 excess cases of T2D and MI per 10,000 person-years. Except for weak signals from within the major histocompatibility complex, there was no evidence of genetic risk loci shared between psoriasis and cardiometabolic traits. Our findings suggest that psoriasis, in particular severe psoriasis, increases the risk for T2D and MI, and that the genetic architecture of psoriasis and cardiometabolic traits is largely distinct.

ObjectivesTo determine the risk of uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) compared with the general population and patients with psoriasis.MethodsA cohort study using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. Patients with incident PsA aged 18–89 years were identified and matched to a cohort of patients with psoriasis and a general population cohort. The incidence of uveitis, all IBD, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis was calculated for each study cohort and adjusted relative risks (RRadj) were calculated using conditional Poisson regression.Results6783 incident cases of PsA were identified with a median age of 49 years. The risk of uveitis was significantly higher in the PsA cohort than in the general population and psoriasis cohorts (RRadj 3.55, 95% CI 2.21 to 5.70 and RRadj 2.13, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.24, respectively). A significant increase was observed for Crohn’s disease (RRadj 2.96, 95% CI 1.46 to 6.00 and RRadj3.60, 95% CI 1.83 to 7.10) but not for ulcerative colitis (RRadj1.30, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.56 and RRadj0.98, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.92).ConclusionsIn a primary care-based incidence cohort of patients with PsA, there were substantial risks of developing uveitis and/or Crohn’s disease, but not ulcerative colitis, when compared with the general population and psoriasis controls.

SummaryBackground Biological therapies are effective treatments for psoriasis and are often prescribed to women of child-bearing age. Objectives To evaluate the safety of biological therapy in conception and/or pregnancy. Methods We performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for multivariate-adjusted studies of women exposed to biologics relevant to the treatment of psoriasis during conception and/or pregnancy. Results We identified four population-based cohort studies involving 1300 women exposed to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (TNFi) 3 months prior to or during the first 3 months of pregnancy. These studies showed a trend towards drug-specific harm with TNFi exposure in women with different inflammatory diseases, with an increased risk of congenital malformations [three studies; odds ratio (OR) range 1·32–1·64] and preterm birth (one study; OR 1·69, 95% confidence interval 1·10–2·60). This trend did not reach statistical significance in all studies; study heterogeneity, variation across comparator cohorts, inadequate adjustment for important confounding variables such as co-therapy, and an absence of a common constellation of malformations means there is uncertainty about the causal role of TNFi. No studies specifically addressed the effect of TNFi exposure in psoriasis during conception and/or pregnancy, or of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-12/23 antagonists in any indication. Conclusions When counselling women these findings must be balanced against the potential impact of untreated severe psoriasis on conception and/or pregnancy and maternal wellbeing; ongoing pharmacovigilance via registries remains essential to address this evidence gap.

Objectives: To describe the time interval between the onset of psoriasis and PsA in the UK primary care setting and compare with a large, well-classified secondary care cohort.Methods: Patients with PsA and/or psoriasis were identified in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The secondary care cohort comprised patients from the Bath PsA longitudinal observational cohort study. For incident PsA patients in the CPRD who also had a record of psoriasis, the time interval between PsA diagnosis and first psoriasis record was calculated. Comparisons were made with the time interval between diagnoses in the Bath cohort.Results: There were 5272 eligible PsA patients in the CPRD and 815 in the Bath cohort. In both cohorts, the majority of patients (82.3 and 61.3%, respectively) had psoriasis before their PsA diagnosis or within the same calendar year (10.5 and 23.8%), with only a minority receiving their PsA diagnosis first (7.1 and 14.8%). Excluding those who presented with arthritis before psoriasis, the median time between diagnoses was 8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2-15] in the CPRD and 7 years (IQR 0-20) in the Bath cohort. In the CPRD, 60.1 and 75.1% received their PsA diagnosis within 10 and 15 years of their psoriasis diagnosis, respectively; this was comparable with 57.2 and 67.7% in the Bath cohort.Conclusion: A similar distribution for the time interval between psoriasis and arthritis was observed in the CPRD and secondary care cohort. These data can inform screening strategies and support the validity of data from each cohort.

Summary Background Multiple questionnaires to screen for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been developed but the optimal screening questionnaire is unknown. Objectives To compare three PsA screening questionnaires in a head-to-head study using CASPAR (the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) as the gold standard. Methods This study recruited from 10 U.K. secondary care dermatology clinics. Patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis, not previously diagnosed with PsA, were given all three questionnaires. All patients who were positive on any questionnaire were invited for a rheumatological assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the three questionnaires according to CASPAR criteria. Results In total, 938 patients with psoriasis were invited to participate and 657 (70%) patients returned the questionnaires. One or more questionnaires were positive in 314 patients (48%) and 195 (62%) of these patients attended for assessment. Of these, 47 patients (24%) were diagnosed with PsA according to the CASPAR criteria. The proportion of patients with PsA increased with the number of positive questionnaires (one questionnaire, 19·1%; two, 34·0%; three, 46·8%). Sensitivities and specificities for the three questionnaires, and areas under the ROC curve were, respectively: Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Evaluation (PASE), 74·5%, 38·5%, 0·594; Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), 76·6%, 37·2%, 0·610; Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS), 76·6%, 29·7%, 0·554. The majority of patients with a false positive response had degenerative or osteoarthritis. Conclusion Although the PEST and ToPAS questionnaires performed slightly better than the PASE questionnaire at identifying PsA, there is little difference between these instruments. These screening tools identify many cases of musculoskeletal disease other than PsA.

BACKGROUND Methotrexate is activated by the sequential addition of glutamic acid residues to form methotrexate polyglutamates (MTXPG(1-5)). MTXPG(1-5) inhibit enzymes of the folate-purine-pyrimidine pathways, and longer-chain MTXPG(3-5) species are more active. OBJECTIVES To determine the pattern of erythrocyte MTXPG(1-5) in patients initiated on oral methotrexate for psoriasis, and to investigate the potential utility of MTXPGs as markers of compliance and/or clinical response. METHODS This was a single-centre, prospective study of 55 adult patients with chronic plaque psoriasis initiated on weekly oral methotrexate. Erythrocyte MTXPG(1-5) concentrations were measured (at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52) using high-performance liquid chromatography. Methotrexate responders achieved ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index or physician's global score of 'clear'/'nearly clear' at 24 weeks. RESULTS MTXPG levels were measured in 14-33 patients at each time point. All MTXPG(1-5) species were detected at week 4 of therapy. Steady state for long-chain MTXPG(3-5) and total MTXPG(1-5) was achieved by week 24. MTXPG(3) emerged as the predominant MTXPG species (from week 12 onwards) and reflected overall polyglutamate status (correlating strongly with MTXPG(2-5) , MTXPG(3-5) and MTXPG(4-5) ; R = 0·76-0·95, P < 1·55 × 10(-5)). Age, renal function and sex were not significant determinants of MTXPG(3) concentration. No significant association was identified between MTXPG and adverse events or responder status. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to demonstrate the prospective accumulation of MTXPG(1-5) in patients with psoriasis. The detection of MTXPGs early in therapy and the establishment of a steady state with continuous treatment may offer measuring of MTXPG as a test to monitor patient compliance with therapy. Larger studies are required to determine the role of MTXPG as a potential biomarker of clinical response.