1. Stress Echocardiography After Mitral Valve Repair Using a Semirigid Partial Band
- Author
-
Satoshi Numata, Satoshi Teramukai, Sachiko Yamazaki, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Yamano, Hitoshi Yaku, and Kiyoshi Doi
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mitral Valve Annuloplasty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cardiac index ,Hemodynamics ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Stress Echocardiography ,Humans ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,Body surface area ,Mitral regurgitation ,Mitral valve repair ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Mitral Valve Insufficiency ,Confidence interval ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,Mitral Valve ,Female ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Echocardiography, Stress - Abstract
The reduction in exercise capacity after mitral valve repair (MVr) for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation is an unsolved issue. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamics after MVr using a partial semirigid band during exercise stress echocardiography and to identify predictive factors for achieving better exercise capacity after MVr.We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients using exercise stress echocardiography within 5 years of having undergone MVr using a partial semirigid band between 2013 and 2019. Values of maximal workload were converted into numbers of metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved for each patient. Age and sex expected METs (eMETs) were obtained, and percent eMETs (%eMETs [achieved METs / eMETs × 100]) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify the determinants of %eMETs.Only one third of patients achieved eMETs. Significant determinants of %eMETs were age at exercise stress echocardiography (β coefficient 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.96; P.001), female sex (β coefficient 16.9; 95% confidence interval, 8.58 to 25.17; P.001), and larger indexed device size (device size/body surface area; β coefficient 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 6.46; P = .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of 19.5 mm/mPatients with larger indexed device size achieved greater exercise capacity after MVr using a partial semirigid band. Preoperative evaluation to decide whether we can use an annuloplasty device larger than 19.5 mm/m
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF