Search

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcations is an unmet issue. The BIFURCAT registry was obtained by merging two registries on coronary bifurcations. Three groups were compared in a two-by-two fashion: short-term DAPT (≤ 6 months), intermediate-term DAPT (6-12 months) and extended DAPT (>12 months). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis) were the primary endpoint. Single components of MACE were the secondary endpoints. Events were appraised according to the clinical presentation: chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) versus acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 5537 patients (3231 ACS, 2306 CCS) were included. After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 0.9-2.2), extended DAPT was associated with a lower incidence of MACE compared with intermediate-term DAPT (2.8% versus 3.4%, adjusted HR 0.23 [0.1-0.54], p

International audience; Background: The PARIS risk score (PARIS-rs) and percutaneous coronary intervention complexity (PCI-c) predict clinical and procedural residual ischemic risk following PCI. Their accuracy in patients undergoing unprotected left main (ULM) or bifurcation PCI has not been assessed.Methods: The predictive performances of the PARIS-rs (categorized as low, intermediate, and high) and PCI-c (according to guideline-endorsed criteria) were evaluated in 3,002 patients undergoing ULM/bifurcation PCI with very thin strut stents.Results: After 16 (12-22) months, increasing PARIS-rs (8.8% vs. 14.1% vs. 27.4%, p < .001) and PCI-c (15.2% vs. 11%, p = .025) were associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiac events ([MACE], a composite of death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization), driven by MI/death for PARIS-rs and target lesion revascularization/stent thrombosis for PCI-c (area under the curves for MACE: PARIS-rs 0.60 vs. PCI-c 0.52, p-for-difference < .001). PCI-c accuracy for MACE was higher in low-clinical-risk patients; while PARIS-rs was more accurate in low-procedural-risk patients. ≥12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with a lower MACE rate in high PARIS-rs patients, (adjusted-hazard ratio 0.42 [95% CI: 0.22-0.83], p = .012), with no benefit in low to intermediate PARIS-rs patients. No incremental benefit with longer DAPT was observed in complex PCI.Conclusions: In the setting of ULM/bifurcation PCI, the residual ischemic risk is better predicted by a clinical risk estimator than by PCI complexity, which rather appears to reflect stent/procedure-related events. Careful procedural risk estimation is warranted in patients at low clinical risk, where PCI complexity may substantially contribute to the overall residual ischemic risk.

Background The clinical impact of stent strut thickness in coronary bifurcation lesions in small vessels has not been assessed in a real-world population. Methods and results All 506 patients enrolled in the RAIN study, undergoing PCI in a vessel with a diameter 2.5 mm or less were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups according to stent strut thickness: 74 μm (n = 206) versus 81 μm (n = 300); 87.1% of the lesions involved bifurcations. TLF [defined as a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)] was the primary endpoint, with MACE (a composite of death, MI and TLR), its components and stent thrombosis the secondary endpoint. After 16 (14-18) months, a lower incidence of TLF (4.3 vs. 9.8%, P = 0.026) and ST (1.0 vs. 3.0%, P = 0.042) was seen in the 74 μm group, whereas MACE occurred in 60 of 506 patients, with no statistical difference between the two groups (9.7 vs. 13.3%, P = 0.070). At multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure increased the risk of TLF while thinner strut was an independent protective factor (hazard ratio 0.51, CI 0.17-0.85, P = 0.005). Conclusion In this real-world population, patients being treated for small vessels lesions with thinner strut stents had lower rates of TLF, MI and ST.

Background: Elderly patients receive bare metal stents instead of drug-eluting stents (DES) to shorten the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The SENIOR trial compared outcomes between these 2 types of stents combined with a short duration of DAPT. A significant decrease in the number of patients with at least 1 major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) was noted in the DES group. Objectives: The objective of this article was to perform an economic evaluation of the SENIOR trial. Methods: This evaluation was performed separately in 5 participating countries using pooled patient-level data from all study patients and country-specific unit costs and utility values. Costs, MACCEs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated in both arms at 1 year, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated. Uncertainty was explored by probabilistic bootstrapping. Results: A total of 1200 patients underwent randomization. The average total cost per patient was higher in the DES group. The number of MACCEs and average QALYs were not statistically different between the 2 groups. The 1-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each country of reference ranged from (sic)13 752 to (sic)20 511/MACCE avoided and from (sic)42 835 to (sic)68 231/QALY gained. The scatter plots found a wide dispersion, reflecting a large uncertainty surrounding the results. But in each country studied, 90% of the bootstrap replications indicated a higher cost for greater effectiveness for the DES group. Assuming a willingness to pay of (sic)50000/QALY, there was between a 40% and 50% chance that the use of DES was cost-effective in 4 countries. Conclusion: The use of DES instead of bare metal stents combined with a short duration of DAPT in elderly patients induced higher cost for greater effectiveness in each of the 5 countries studied.

OBJECTIVES: Report the results at 2 years of the patients included in the SENIOR trial. BACKGROUND: Patients above 75 years of age represent a fast-growing population in the cathlab. In the SENIOR trial, patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stent (DES) and a short duration of P2Y12 inhibitor (1 and 6 months for stable and unstable coronary syndromes, respectively) compared with bare metal stents (BMS) was associated with a 29% reduction in the rate of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) at 1 year. The results at 2 years are reported here. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 1,200 patients (596[50%] to the DES group and 604[50%] to the BMS group). At 2 years, the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke and ID-TLR had occurred in 116 (20%) patients in the DES group and 131 (22%) patients in the BMS group (RR 0.90 [95%CI 0.72-1.13], p = .37). IDTLR occurred in 14 (2%) patients in the DES group and 41 (7%) patients in the BMS group (RR 0.35 [95%CI 0.16-0.60], p = .0002). Major bleedings (BARC 3-5) occurred in 27(5%) patients in both groups (RR 1.00, [95%CI 0.58-1.75], p = .99). Stent thrombosis rates were low and similar between DES and BMS (0.8 vs 1.3%, (RR 0.52 [95%CI 0.01-1.95], p = .27). CONCLUSION: Among elderly PCI patients, a strategy combining a DES together with a short duration of DAPT is associated with a reduction in revascularization up to 2 years compared with BMS with very few late events and without any increased in bleeding complications or stent thrombosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29159 ispartof: CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS vol:97 issue:5 pages:E607-E613 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Incidence and predictors of adverse events after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation in patients treated with thin stents (

Background There are limited data regarding the impact of bioresorbable polymer drug eluting stent (BP-DES) compared to durable polymer drug eluting stent (DP-DES) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention using ultrathin stents in left main or bifurcations. Methods In the RAIN registry (ClinicalTrials NCT03544294, june 2018 retrospectively registered) patients with a ULM or bifurcation stenosis treated with PCI using ultrathin stents (struts thinner than 81 μm) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, TLR and stent thrombosis) and its components, along with target vessel revascularization (TVR) were the secondary ones. A propensity score with matching analysis to compare patients treated with BP-DES versus DP-DES was also assessed. Results From 3001 enrolled patients, after propensity score analysis 1400 patients (700 for each group) were selected. Among them, 352 had ULM disease and 1048 had non-LM bifurcations. At 16 months (12–22), rates of TLR (3.7% vs 2.9%, p = 0.22) and MACE were similar (12.3% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.74) as well as for the other endpoints. Sensitivity analysis of outcomes after a two-stents strategy, showed better outcome in term of MACE (20.4% vs 10%, p = 0.03) and TVR (12% vs 4.6%, p = 0.05) and a trend towards lower TLR in patients treated with BP-DES. Conclusion In patients with bifurcations or ULM treated with ultrathin stents BP-DES seems to perform similarly to DP-DES: the trends toward improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with the BP-DES might potentially be of value for speculating the stent choice in selected high-risk subgroups of patients at increased risk of ischemic events. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03544294. Retrospectively registered June 1, 2018.

International audience; Objectives: To evaluate the independent clinical impact of stent structural features in a large cohort of patients undergoing unprotected left main (ULM) or coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a range of very thin strut stents.Background: Clinical impact of structural features of contemporary stents remains to be defined.Methods: All consecutive patients enrolled in the veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life (RAIN) registry were included. The following stent structural features were studied: antiproliferative drugs (everolimus vs. sirolimus vs. zotarolimus), strut material (platinum-chromium vs. cobalt-chromium), polymer (bioresorbable vs. durable), number of crowns (

Objectives The authors sought to assess the association between admission time with patient’s care, procedure characteristics, and clinical outcomes within a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background The effect of admission time on STEMI patient9s outcomes remains controversial when primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy. Methods Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 2,167 consecutive STEMI patients admitted in a tertiary PCI-capable center were collected. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 pm and off-hours as admission during night shift, weekend, and nonworking holidays. In-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality were assessed as well as key time delays. Results A total of 1,048 patients (48.3%) were admitted during on-hours, and 1,119 patients (51.7%) during off-hours. Characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups, including rates of cardiac arrest (7.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.55) and cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.16). Median symptom-to-first medical contact time and median first medical contact-to-sheath insertion time did not differ according to on- versus off-hours admission (120 min vs. 126 min; p = 0.25 and 90 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.58, respectively), as well as the rate of radial access for catheterization (85.6% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.27). There was no association between on- versus off-hours groups and in-hospital (8.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.49) or 1-year mortality (11.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.89), respectively. Conclusions In a contemporary organized STEMI network, patients admitted in a high-volume tertiary primary PCI center during on-hours or off-hours had similar management and 1-year outcomes.

ObjectivesContrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common and potentially severe complication in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). There is no consensus on the best definition of CI-AKI to identify patients at risk of haemodialysis or death. The objective of this study was to assess the association of CI-AKI, using four definitions, on inhospital mortality, mortality or haemodialysis requirement over 1-year follow-up, in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI.MethodsIn this prospective, observational study, all patients with STEMI referred for pPCI were included. We identified independent variables associated with CI-AKI and mortality.ResultsWe included 1114 consecutive patients with STEMI treated by pPCI. CI-AKI occurred in 18.3%, 12.2%, 15.6% and 10.5% of patients according to the CIN, Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and RIFLE Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) definitions, respectively. The RIFLE (CKD-EPI) definition was the most discriminant definition to identify patients at higher risk of inhospital mortality (27.1% vs 4.0%; adjusted OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 5.1), p=0.003), 1-year mortality (27.4% vs 6.6%; adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), p=0.002) and haemodialysis requirement at 1-year follow-up (15.6% vs 2.7%; adjusted OR 6.7 (95% CI 3.3 to 13.6), p=0.001). Haemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, preexisting renal failure, elderly age and a high contrast media volume were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Of interest, contrast-media volume was not correlated to increase of creatininaemia (r=0.06) or decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (r=0.05) after percutaneous coronary intervention in our population.ConclusionsCI-AKI is a frequent and serious complication of STEMI treated by pPCI. The RIFLE definition is the most accurate definition to identify patients with CI-AKI at high risk of mortality or haemodialysis.

Aims The differential impact on ischaemic and bleeding events of the type of drug-eluting stent [durable polymer stents [DES] vs. biodegradable polymer stents vs. bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS)] and length of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains to be defined. Methods and results Randomized controlled trials comparing different types of DES and/or DAPT durations were selected. The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) [a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization]. Definite stent thrombosis (ST) and single components of MACE were secondary endpoints. The arms of interest were: BRS with 12 months of DAPT (12mDAPT), biodegradable polymer stent with 12mDAPT, durable polymer stent [everolimus-eluting (EES), zotarolimus-eluting (ZES)] with 12mDAPT, EES/ZES with 12 months of DAPT (DAPT > 12 m). Sixty-four studies with 150 arms and 102 735 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 20 months, MACE rates were similar in the different arms of interest. EES/ZES with DAPT > 12 m reported a lower incidence of MI than the other groups, while BRS showed a higher rate of ST when compared to EES/ZES, irrespective of DAPT length. A higher risk of major bleedings was observed for DAPT > 12 m as compared to shorter DAPT. Conclusion Durable and biodegradable polymer stents along with BRS report a similar rate of MACE irrespective of DAPT length. Fewer MI are observed with EES/ZES with DAPT > 12 m, while a higher rate of ST is reported for BRS when compared to EES/ZES, independently from DAPT length. Stent type may partially affect the outcome together with DAPT length.

Background Differences between long-term outcomes among women and men treated by percutaneous intervention (PCI) are unknown. Purpose To compare characteristics mortality and impact of gender on poor outcomes after PCI. Methods Consecutive men and women admitted for PCI between 2008 and 2011 were prospectively included and followed-up until January 2019. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and causes of death were collected through consultations, calls and death certificates. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality according to gender. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death and MACCEs. Results A total of 3524 patients including 2720 men (77.1%) and 804 women (22.8%) were followed-up for a median time of 7.0 years (IQ1: 5.4; IQ 3: 7.2) with a follow rate of 97.6%. At baseline, women were older (70 ± 13.1 vs. 64.6 ± 12 years old) and smoked less (18.9% vs. 30.4%), had more frequently hypertension (67.9% vs. 58.1%) and chronic kidney disease (42.6% vs. 22.7%), whereas diabetes rate was similar around 29%. PCI for myocardial infarction at admission represented 23% with no difference according to gender. Prognosis was severe as all-cause death occurred for 30.3% and MACCE for 40.9% of all patients. In unadjusted analyses, women had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (35% vs. 29%, HR = 1.25, 95%CI [1.09–1.43], P = 0.0015) and cardiovascular mortality (61% vs. 57%, HR = 1.31, 95%CI [1.10–1.56]) but there was no difference on occurrence of MACCE (HR = 1.079, 95%CI [0.9271–1.221]). After adjustment for baseline cardiovascular risk factors, presentation and severity of coronary disease, there was no difference between men and women for mortality ( Fig. 1 ). Conclusions In this long-term follow-up, women had a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after PCI in unadjusted analyses. However, gender was not independently associated with mortality after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors.

Introduction Incidence and predictors of adverse events after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation in patients treated with ultrathin stents in unprotected left main (ULM) or coronary bifurcation remain undefined. Methods All consecutive patients presenting with a critical lesion of an ULM or a lesion involving a main coronary bifurcation and treated with very thin strut stents were included. MACE (a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST) was the primary endpoint, while target vessel revascularization (TVR) was the secondary endpoint. Moreover, type and occurrence of ST and occurrence of ST, CV death and MI during DAPT or after DAPT discontinuation were also evaluated. All analyses were performed according to length of DAPT dividing the patients in 3 groups: short DAPT (3-months), intermediate DAPT (3–12 months) and long DAPT (12-months). Results 117 patients were discharged with an indication for DAPT≤3 months (median 1:1–2.5), 200 for DAPT between 3 and 12 months (median 8:7–10) and 1958 with 12 months DAPT. After 12.8 months (8–20), MACE was significantly higher in the 3-month group compared to 3–12 and 12-month groups (9.4% vs. 4.0% vs. 7.2%, p≤0.001), mainly driven by MI (4.4% vs. 1.5% vs. 3%, p≤0.001) and overall ST (4.3% vs. 1.5% vs. 1.8%, p≤0.001). ST post DAPT cessation were comparable (1.7% vs. 0% vs. 0.7%, p=0.42) with a median time to ST post DAPT discontinuation of 1.67 months (0.48–4.7). At multivariate analysis, DAPT of 12-months compared to 3-months reduces the risk of overall ST (OR 0.103: 0.019–0.0563, 95% CI) while only a trend was noted for DAPT between 3 and 12 months (OR 0.61: 0.186–2.005, 95% CI). When analysed by stent strategy a 2-stent strategy predicted ST post DAPT cessation (OR 3.241: 1.048–10.026, 95% CI), which was reduced by use of FKB (OR 0.101:0.01–0.872, 95% CI). Conclusion Even stents with very thin strut when implanted in real-life ULM or coronary bifurcation patients discharged with short DAPT have a relevant risk of ST, which remains high although not significant after DAPT cessation. The correct identification before PCI of the more fragile patients who may receive a shorter DAPT regimen could help identify the safest PCI technique: provisional stenting and use of final kissing balloon (FKB) are the safest options.

International audience; OBJECTIVES:Evaluate safety and efficacy of polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents (PF-BESs) versus ultrathin stents in unprotected left main (ULM) or bifurcation.BACKGROUND:PF-BESs due to reduced length of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are increasingly used. However, there are limited data about safety and efficacy for ULM or bifurcation.METHODS:We selected all-patients treated for ULM or bifurcation from two multicenter real life registries (RAIN [NCT03544294] evaluating ultrathin stents, CHANCE [NCT03622203] appraising PF-BES). After propensity score with matching, the primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis [ST]), while its components along with target vessel revascularization (TVR) secondary endpoints.RESULTS:Three thousand and three patients treated with ultrathin stents and 446 with PF-BESs, resulting respectively in 562 and 281 after propensity score with matching (33 and 22%, respectively, with ULM disease). After 12 (8-20) months, rates of MACE were similar (9 vs. 8%, p = 0.56) without difference in TLR and ST (3.0 vs. 1.7%, p = .19 and 1.8 vs. 1.1%, p = .42). These results were consistent for ULM group (3 vs. 1.7% and 1.8 vs. 1.1%, p = .49 and .76), for non-ULM group (2.1 vs. 3.4%, p = .56 and 1.2 vs. 1.7%, p = .78) and for two-stent strategy (8.7 vs. 4.5% and 4.3 vs. 3.2%, p = .75 and .91). Among patients treated with 1 month of DAPT in both groups, those with ultrathin stents experienced higher rates of MACE related to all-cause death (22 vs. 12%, p = .04) with higher although not significant rates of ST (3 vs. 0%, p = .45).CONCLUSIONS:PF-BES implanted on ULM or BiF offered freedom from TLR and ST comparable to ultrathin stents. PF-BESs patients assuming DAPT for 1 month experienced a lower despite not significant incidence of ST.

Introduction Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex lesions, including unprotected left main (ULM) and bifurcations, is gaining a relevant role in treating coronary artery disease with good outcomes, also thanks to new generation stents. The daily risk of adverse cardiovascular events and their temporal distribution after these procedures is not known. Methods All consecutive patients presenting with a critical lesion of ULM or bifurcation treated with very thin struts stents, enrolled in the RAIN-Cardiogroup VII study, were analyzed. The daily risk of major acute cardiovascular events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST) and their temporal distribution in the first year of follow-up was the primary endpoint. Differences among subgroups (ULM, patient presentation, kind of stent polymer) were the secondary endpoint. Results 2745 patients were included, mean age 68 ± 11 years, 33.3% diabetics, 54.5% had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); 88.5% of treated lesions were bifurcations, 27.2% ULM. Average daily risk was 0.022% for MACE, 0.005% for TLR and 0.004% for ST, in the first year. Bimodal distribution of adverse events, especially TLR, with an early peak in the first 50 days and a late one after 150 days, was observed. Patients with ULM presented a significantly higher daily risk of events, and ACS patients presented higher MACE risk. No difference emerged according to the type of stent polymer. Conclusions The daily risk of adverse events in the first year after complex PCI in our study is acceptably low. PCI on ULM carries a higher risk of complications.

Few data are available about the impact on outcomes of procedural strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-struts stents on unprotected left main (ULM): 792 patients with an ULM stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut stents were enrolled in the present multicenter registry. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary end point. MACE (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, TLR, and stent thrombosis) and its single components, along with target vessel revascularization were the secondary end points. Subgroup analyses were performed according to complex versus noncomplex bifurcation lesions. After 16 months, 5.5% of patients experienced a TLR. At multivariate analysis, provisional stenting (odds ratio [OR] 0.46: 0.85 to 0.23, p = 0.006), use of imaging (OR 0.45: 0.23 to 0.98, p = 0.003) and final kissing balloon (FKB) (OR 0.41: 0.83 to 0.21, p = 0.001) reduced risk of TLR. FKB reduced risk of overall TLR only for 2 stents-strategy (6.2% vs 32.4%, p

Background Data concerning long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and factors of poor outcomes are scarce. Objective To describe short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term mortality and their correlates after PCI. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we included and followed-up consecutive patients admitted for PCI from 2008 to 2011. Independent adjudicators reviewed the ischemic outcomes and causes of death until January 2019. A survival analysis was performed to compare the occurrence of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death at 30 days, one year and up to 8 years. Results Of the 3524, patients treated with PCI from 2008 to 2011, 2720 (77.2%) were men and 804 (22.8%) were women with a mean age of 65.8 years old. The median follow-up was 7.0 years (IQ1: 5.4; IQ3: 7.2) and complete for 97.6% of the patients. One third of the patients died (30.3%; n = 1070) in a median time of 2.5 years after PCI, with a rate of 5.3 deaths per 100 patient-years. Overall, mortality was mostly related to cardiovascular causes than non-cardiovascular causes (17.7% versus 12.6%, log-rank Fig. 1 ). Cardiovascular death was more frequent within 30 days (4.7% vs. 0.3%, P Conclusions Cardiovascular death was more frequent than non-cardiovascular death in patients treated with PCI in the short and intermediate-term but not beyond one year. Cancer accounted for one fifth of the overall mortality.

Background and objectives Whether prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is more protective in patients with CKD and drug-eluting stents compared with shorter DAPT is uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine whether shorter DAPT in patients with drug-eluting stents and CKD is associated with lower mortality or major adverse cardiovascular event rates compared with longer DAPT. Design, setting, participants, & measurements A Medline literature research was conducted to identify randomized trials in patients with drug-eluting stents comparing different DAPT duration strategies. Inclusion of patients with CKD was also required. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis (definite or probable). Major bleeding was the secondary outcome. The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a random-effects model. Results Five randomized trials were included (1902 patients with CKD). Short DAPT (≤6 months) was associated with a similar incidence of the primary outcome, compared with 12-month DAPT among patients with CKD (48 versus 50 events; RR, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.64 to 1.36; P=0.72). Twelve-month DAPT was also associated with a similar incidence of the primary outcome compared with extended DAPT (≥30 months) in the CKD subgroup (35 versus 35 events; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.62; P=0.87). Numerically lower major bleeding event rates were detected with shorter versus 12-month DAPT (9 versus 13 events; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.60; P=0.39) and 12-month versus extended DAPT (9 versus 12 events; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.93; P=0.66) in patients with CKD. Conclusions Short DAPT does not appear to be inferior to longer DAPT in patients with CKD and drug-eluting stents. Because of imprecision in estimates (few events and wide confidence intervals), no definite conclusions can be drawn with respect to stent thrombosis.

Background Latent heart failure could be unmasked during exercise. Left atrial (LA) remodeling reflects the cumulative effects of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure over time and is usually determined by measurement of the LA volume indexed to body surface area (LAVi). We hypothesized that an indexation of the LA volume to the LV volume (LA/LV) would be more sensitive to detect abnormal exercise LV filling pressure as an index of early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) Purpose To assess the value of the LA/LV ratio to detect abnormal exercise LVEDP in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and to investigate its association with maximal exercise capacity in two different cohorts. Methods We invasively measured LVEDP at rest and during low-level exercise in 45 patients with LVEF > 50% and normal resting LVEDP (LVEDP ≤ 16 mmHg). Correlations and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the association of LA/LV and LAVi with resting LVEDP, exercise LVEDP and ΔLVEDP (exercise LVEDP–resting LVEDP). The association of LA size indices with maximal exercise capacity during exercise echocardiography was also evaluated in 207 other patients. Results In the invasive study, 27 out of 45 patients had abnormal LV filling pressures during exercise. LA/LV and LAVi were not correlated to resting LVEDP. Among the two, only LA/LV was significantly correlated to exercise LVEDP (r = 0.42, P = 0.004), ΔLVEDP (r = 0.39, P = 0.007), and had a significant diagnostic value to detect early-stage HFpEF (area under the ROC curve 0.74, P = 0.007). In the non-invasive study, LA/LV was significantly associated with exercise capacity in multivariate analysis (β = −0.153, P = 0.012) while LAVi was not in a similar model. Conclusion The relative expansion of the LA over the LV as an early sign of heart remodeling appears more valuable than the conventional LAVi to detect early-stage HFpEF.

Background Diabetic patients account for an increasing number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased residual platelet activity during dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) and DM patients have worse clinical outcomes after PCI as compared to non-DM. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) and long duration DAPT (L-DAPT) after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in DM and non-DM patients. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of S-DAPT versus L-DAPT after DES implantation in DM and non-DM patients. Efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and composite end point of net adverse clinical events (NACE) (all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ST, TVR, stroke, major bleeding). Safety endpoints were major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a forest plot of relative risk using a random effects model. Results We included eight RCTs that randomized 28,318 patients to S-DAPT versus L-DAPT (8234 DM and 20,084 non-DM). S-DAPT was associated with an increased rate of ST in non-DM patients [3.67 (2.04, 6.59)]. There was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, MI, TVR, major bleeding, stroke and NACE with S-DAPT and L-DAPT in DM patients [1.19 (0.72–1.95); 1.25 (0.69, 2.25); 1.52 (0.70, 3.29); 1.33 (0.88, 2.01); 1.39 (0.89, 2.17); 0.92 (0.19, 4.42); 0.98 (0.29, 3.28); and 0.94 (0.57, 1.54) respectively]. Further, there was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, TVR, major bleeding, stroke and NACE with S-DAPT and L-DAPT in non-DM patients [0.93 (0.58, 1.48); 0.75 (0.42, 1.35); 1.52 (0.81, 2.83); 0.99 (0.71, 1.39); 0.72 (0.28, 1.84); 1.01 (0.40, 2.56); and 1.01 (0.77, 1.32) respectively]. Conclusion Compared to L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with significant increase in rate of ST in non-DM patients. Duration of DAPT had no significant impact on rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, ST and TVR among DM patients.

Aims To assess the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results We included all consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI with a negative troponin level at admission from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of periprocedural MI (Type 4a MI), stent thrombosis (Type 4b MI), and myocardial injury according to the Third universal definition of MI. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of periprocedural MI and myocardial injury and its relation to 30-day and 1-year clinical outcome. Of the 1390 elective PCI patients, the primary endpoint occurred in 28.7% of patients, including 7.0% of Type 4a MI, 0.14% of Type 4b MI, and 21.6% of myocardial injury. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of the primary endpoint were left main PCI, total stent length >30 mm, multiple stenting, chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 75 years. At 30 days, patients with periprocedural MI and myocardial injury had a higher rate of cardiovascular events [5.5% vs. 1.2%, adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) = 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-6.9; P

Background Although some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have suggested that prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may be associated with increased mortality, the mechanistic underpinnings of this association remain unclear. Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the associations among bleeding, mortality, and DAPT duration after drug-eluting stent implantation in a meta-analysis of RCTs. Methods RCTs comparing different DAPT durations after drug-eluting stent placement were sought through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the proceedings of international meetings. Deaths were considered possibly bleeding related if occurring within 1 year of the episodes of bleeding. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat. Secondary analysis was performed in a modified intention-to-treat population in which events occurring when all patients were on DAPT were excluded. Results Individual patient data were obtained for 6 RCTs, and aggregate data were available for 12 RCTs. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher rates of mortality compared with those without, and in a time-adjusted multivariate analysis, bleeding was an independent predictor of mortality occurring within 1 year of the bleeding episode (hazard ratio: 6.93; 95% confidence interval: 4.53 to 10.60; p< 0.0001). Shorter DAPT was associated with lower rates of all-cause death compared with longer DAPT (hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.00; p= 0.05), which was driven by lower rates of bleeding-related deaths with shorter DAPT compared with prolonged DAPT (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.43 to 0.99; p= 0.04). Mortality unrelated to bleeding was comparable between the 2groups. Similar results were apparent in the modified intention-to-treat population. Conclusions Bleeding was strongly associated with the occurrence of mortality within 1 year after the bleeding event. Shorter compared with longer DAPT was associated with lower risk for bleeding-related death, a finding that mayunderlie the lower all-cause mortality with shorter DAPT in the RCTs of different DAPT durations after DES.

The ratio of early diastolic trans-mitral flow velocity to tissue-Doppler mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e′), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure(LVEDP) have been shown to be correlated at rest, provided that patients are not on positive inotropic drugs. Data concerning the latter correlation during exercise stress are conflicting. Therefore, we investigated if use of negative inotropic drugs (NID), impacts the accuracy of E/e′ as a surrogate for LVEDP during low-level exercise. An exercise(50 watts) during cardiac invasive hemodynamic monitoring and an exercise echocardiography were performed prospectively within 24 hours in 54 patients (81%male, 62 ± 9years) with preserved LV Ejection-Fraction. Before exercise, the patients had scattered LVEDP (13.8 ± 5.8 mmHg) and septal E/e′ (8.7 ± 2.7). Half of them were on NID, mainly betablockers(n = 26). The correlation between septal-E/e′ and LVEDP was low for examinations performed at rest (r = 0.35,p = 0.01) with no significant impact of NID. For measurements performed at 50 Watts, NID had a significant impact on the association between septal-E/e′50 watts and LVEDP50 watts (β = −0.28,p = 0.03). Correlation between septal-E/e′50 watts and LVEDP50 watts persisted in patients on NID (r = 0.61,p = 0.001) while it disappeared in the group of patients with no NID (r = 0.15,p = 0.47). NID use is an important confounding factor to take into consideration when assessing exercise LVFP using stress E/e′ in patients with preserved LVEF.

Objective To study the cumulative evidence for vorapaxar use in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods A systematic review of randomized control trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane databases comparing vorapaxar with placebo was performed. Pre-specified efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, CV mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke and repeat revascularization. The pre-specified safety endpoint was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and a composite of TIMI major and minor bleeding. Risk ratios were used as the metric of choice by applying random effects models. Results Five randomized controlled trials with 40,630 patients were included in final analysis. Compared with placebo, vorapaxar led to a statistically non-significant reduction in risk of MI [RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.80–0.93, p=0.427] and ischemic stroke [RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72–0.97, p=0.920]. No differences were observed between vorapaxar and placebo with respect to all-cause mortality [RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.90–1.08, p=0.620], cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.83–1.06, p=0.351], repeat revascularization [RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.82–1.15, p=0.236], and TIMI bleeding [RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.98–1.69, p=0.126]. Vorapaxar was associated with a statistically non-significant higher risk of ICH [RR 2.36; 95% CI 1.40–3.96, p=0.137] compared with placebo. Conclusion Addition of Vorapaxar to standard medical therapy in in patients with atherosclerotic disease led to a statistically non-significant reduction in the risk of MI and ischemic stroke at the cost of statistically non-significant increase in risk of ICH.

Background Multiple risk factors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) have been described, particularly through the analysis of large northern American cohorts. However, discrepancies in donor selection between the US and European countries are important, particularly concerning donor age. Purpose To evaluate the risk factors for the early development and progression of CAV in a European heart transplantation high volume center. Methods We performed an observational, retrospective single center study. All patients with heart transplantation between 10/01/2008 and 12/31/2013 who had at least one coronary angiography were included. We searched for risk factors of #1 the occurrence of moderate to severe CAV (CAV grades 2 to 3) and #2 the evolution of CAV during follow-up (CAV grade+1 or more compared to baseline) by analyzing the effect of #1 donor risk factors (age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors…), #2 recipient cardiovascular risk factors and #3 recipient transplant-related risk factors (CMV infection, ischemic time, pre-formed donor specific antibodies, biopsy proven rejections…). Results During the study period, 398 patients were transplanted at our center. Among them, 287 had at least one coronary angiogram (analysis of risk factors for CAV 2–3 occurrences) including 206 patients with at least two coronary angiograms (analysis of the evolution of CAV during follow-up). The median follow-up was 5.2 years. After multivariate analyses, only donor risk factors were significantly associated with 1) the risk of occurrence of CAV 2 to 3 (donor age > 40 years: sHR = 6.3, CI = 2–20; smoking: sHR = 2.1, CI = 1.1–4.1; donor sex: female sex: sHR = 0.31, CI = 0.13–0.73) and the risk of CAV progression during follow-up (donor age > 40 years: sHR = 2.9, CI = 1.2–7.2; donor sex: female sex: sHR = 0.2, CI = 0.1–0.6). Conclusion Early moderate to severe CAV occurrence and early CAV progression after heart transplantation were mostly driven by donor characteristics.

To evaluate the potential benefit and risk of addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy in patients who underwent coronary revascularization with either percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane

International audience; Objective: To assess outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) in nonagenarian patients.Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study between 2006 and 2013 in five international high-volume centres and included consecutive all-comer nonagenarians treated with primary PCI for STEMI. There were no exclusion criteria. We enrolled 145 patients and collected demographic, clinical and procedural data. Severe clinical events and mortality at 6 months and 1 year were assessed.Results: Cardiogenic shock was present at admission in 21%. Median (IQR) delay between symptom onset and balloon was 3.7 (2.4–5.6) hours and 60% of procedures were performed through the transradial approach. Successful revascularisation of the culprit vessel was obtained in 86% of the cases (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow of 2 or 3). Major or clinically relevant bleeding was observed in 4% of patients. Median left ventricular ejection fraction post PCI was 41.5% (32.0–50.0). The in-hospital mortality was 24%, with 6 months and 1-year survival rates of 61% and 53%, respectively.Conclusions: In our study, primary PCI in nonagenarians with STEMI was achieved and feasible through a transradial approach. It is associated with a high rate of reperfusion of the infarct-related artery and 53% survival at 1 year. These results suggest that primary PCI may be offered in selected nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction

We aim to evaluate the potential benefit and risk of addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy in patients who underwent coronary revascularization with either percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and the clinical trial registry maintained at clinicaltrials.gov for randomized control trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of vorapaxar in patients who underwent coronary revascularization procedures with either percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Event rates were compared using a Forest plot of relative risk using a random-effects model. The 5 studies (n = 24,025) that met all criteria were included in the final analysis. After coronary revascularization procedures, addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy was associated with reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction (MI; risk ratio 0.83 [0.75 to 0.92]) and ischemic stroke (0.011 [0.007 to 0.016]); however, it also resulted in significant increase risk of hemorrhagic stroke (1.57 [1.01 to 2.44]) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeds (1.36 [1.07 to 1.70]). There was no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (0.90 [0.73 to 1.09]), repeat revascularization (0.78 [0.23 to 2.70]), and stent thrombosis (0.95 [0.62 to 1.45]) in the vorapaxar and control groups. In conclusion, after coronary revascularization procedures, addition of vorapaxar to standard medical therapy was associated with reduction in the risk of MI and ischemic stroke and increase in risk of hemorrhagic stroke and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeds.

Elderly patients regularly receive bare-metal stents (BMS) instead of drug-eluting stents (DES) to shorten the duration of double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). In the SENIOR trial, at one year, the use of latest generation DES with short DAPT (1-month in stable and 6-month in unstable patients) lead

Background Despite improvement in management of coronary artery disease (CAD), recurrent coronary events remain frequent. The aim of this study is to assess predictive factors of plaque rupture, leading to an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by combining metabolic evaluation and coronary plaque imaging. Methods This study involved two cohorts of patients, one concerning stable CAD and one ACS patients. In both groups of patients, plaque imaging was performed with standard coronary angiogram and optimal coherence tomography (OCT) in the 3 main coronary vessels defined by diameter superior to 2.5 mm. Recurrent major adverse cardiac events were collected during follow-up. Comparison of stable and unstable CAD patients will be performed to try to characterize criteria of plaque vulnerability. Results The preliminary results regarding the ACS cohort are presented in this abstract. We included 48 patients with mean age of 60.5 years and 87.3% of men. A three-vessel atherosclerotic disease was found in 42% of patients. A total of 142 non-culprit coronary lesions were analysed by OCT for a mean run of 60.4 mm by artery and total of 5854 mm. B2/C complex lesions (AHA/ACC classification) were represented in 28.2% of patients. OCT analysis allowed to define coronary lesions with mean distance from ostium of 22.6 mm, mean stenosis length of 11.9 mm and mean minimum lumen area (MLA) of 3.95 mm2 with 66.1% of patients with MLA Conclusion OCT analysis of non-culprit coronary lesions is feasible and allows to highlight vulnerable lesions such as asymptomatic plaque ruptures. Analysis of stable cohort, biomarkers and follow-up of patients are necessary to define predictive factors of plaque rupture.

Objectives: To assess safety and feasibility of using radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on oral anticoagulation without interrupting therapy. Background: The radial artery approach for PCI is intuitively attractive for patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) but little data exist concerning feasibility or safety of this approach in this population. The main advantage of this strategy would be to avoid bridging therapy with heparin that increases risk of thrombotic and bleeding events. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 50 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography underwent PCI without interrupting oral anticoagulant therapy. The main outcome measures were bleeding and thrombotic complications. Results: The indications for permanent oral anticoagulation were as follows: atrial fibrillation in 62%, mechanical prosthesis in 24%, and venous thromboembolism in 14%. Seventy-two percent were elective cases and 28% presented with acute coronary syndromes. PCI was performed with an INR range of 1.4–3.4 with mean of 2.2 ± 0.6. Seventy-six percent of the patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy before the procedure. No thrombotic events or excess bleeding were observed at 1 month. Only one patient had a minor hemorrhage 8 days after procedure. Conclusions: This series suggests that for patients treated with VKAs, the use of radial artery access is feasible and safe for PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy without interrupting oral anticoagulant treatment. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

SummaryIntroductionConflicting data exist on the risk of stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS). Little is known about the potential different characteristics and outcomes of DES versus BMS thrombosis.ObjectiveTo compare the characteristics, timing and outcomes of patients with angiographic stent thrombosis according to type of stent implanted.MethodsThe population comprised consecutive patients who underwent BMS or DES implantation (January 2003-April 2007) at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Data from patients with and without a stent thrombosis were compared to identify predictors of thrombosis. Timing of thrombosis (acute, 30 days; very late, >1 year), clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics, and outcomes were compared between patients with a BMS or DES thrombosis.ResultsA total of 3579 patients received a BMS (2815 lesions, 2318 patients) or a DES (1536 lesions, 1261 patients). Documented angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 52 (1.4%) patients, 16 (1.3%) with a DES and 36 (1.6%) with a BMS. Rates of acute (0.1% versus 0.2%), subacute (1% versus 0.7%), late (both 0.2%) and very late (both 0.2%) thrombosis were similar in patients with BMS and DES thrombosis. Factors predictive of stent thrombosis were similar, including left ventricular failure (P

SummaryAims of the studyTo assess mortality in people ≥75 years of age 6 months after myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and treated by angioplasty with complete revascularisation and optimal anti-thrombotic treatment; to compare results to those of younger patients with or without shock and to analyse predictive factors for death.Materials and methodsThe study is based on 1011 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction admitted for primary angioplasty, subdivided into four groups by age and the presence or absence of cardiogenic shock: group 1 (75 years of age (P

Purpose Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) constitues a primary cause of death after heart transplantation. Bare metal stents (BMS) have been used for revascularization, but they are associated with a high-risk of restenosis. Abstract 0474 – Figure: Kaplan-Meier estimates of one-year mortality Figure options Download full-size image Download as PowerPoint slide Limited data have shown favourable results with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) in this specific population. Our study focuses on intra-stent restenosis (ISR) for DES in CAV, on new revascularisation and mortality. Methods 97 consecutive heart transplant recipients with successful PCI were treated with DES (n=106) and BMS (n=25). They were prospectively followed-up at one year after PCI. An angiographic lesion-based analysis at 12-month follow-up and a patient-based survival analysis were performed. Results The lesion-based analysis within 12 months after PCI showed an ISR rate with BMS of 12% and an ISR rate with DES of 3.8%. The target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 8% for BMS and 2.8% for DES. However, the target vessel revascularization was higher (16.5%) and the remote lesion revascularization was 8.7%, indicating the rapid occurrence of new significant lesions. Cardiac mortality at one year was 9.7% and extra- cardiac mortality was 2.9%. Conclusions DES are associated with a low rate of TLR and can safely be used in heart transplant recipients with coronary artery disease. However, new significant lesions occurred at one year indicating a progression of CAV.

Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the isosmolar nonionic dimer iodixanol and the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate in the current era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using clopidogrel, enoxaparine, direct stenting, and drug eluting stent. Background: Previous studies have suggested an association between thrombus-related events and type of contrast media. Methods: Our prospective single-center study included 498 consecutive patients who were assigned to receive either iodixanol (n = 231) or ioxaglate (n = 267). The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACE). A secondary endpoint was the rate of angiographic or procedural complications. Results: Clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics and procedural data were similar in the 2 groups. A peak anti-Xa >0.5 IU/ml was obtained in 97% in both groups. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 42% of patients. Coronary stenting was performed in 91% of patients, with direct stenting in 70%, and drug-eluting stent in 28% of patients. In-hospital MACE was more frequent in patients receiving iodixanol compared with those receiving ioxaglate (4.8% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.005). This difference was mainly related to the appearance of a large thrombus during PCI (6% with iodixanol vs. 0.3% with ioxaglate, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of in-hospital MACE were use of iodixanol (P < 0.01), the higher number of stent used (P < 0.008), bifurcation/ostial lesion (P < 0.01), and balloon dilation before stenting (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our study reflecting the current era of PCI, thrombus-related events are more frequent with the isosmolar nonionic dimer iodixanol than with the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

SummaryBackgroundWhether outcomes differ for women and men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial.AimTo compare 1-year outcomes after primary PCI in women and men with STEMI, matched for age and diabetes.MethodsConsecutive women with STEMI of0.05 for all). After exclusion of patients with shock (10.7%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (6.6%), death rates were even more similar (11.3% vs 11.8%; P=0.10). Female sex was not independently associated with death (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.55–1.87; P=0.97).ConclusionIn our consecutive unselected patient population, women had similar 1-year outcomes to men matched for age and diabetes, after contemporary primary PCI for STEMI, despite having a higher risk profile at baseline.

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with heart disease. Conventional imaging modalities fail to assess RV volumes accurately. We sought to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of routine breath-hold gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived RV mass, volumes and function. We assessed: (1) The accuracy of in vivo MRI-derived RV mass in comparison to the RV weight in 9 minipigs. (2) Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of RV mass, end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in 15 normal volunteers and 10 patients with heart disease. (3) Inter-study reproducibility of the former parameters in 25 coronary artery disease patients. (4) The correlation between right and left ventricular stroke volumes in the total population. Strong statistically significant correlations were found between: (1) MRI-derived RV mass and RV weight (r = 0.98, bias = 2.5 g), (2) Intra-observer measurements of RV mass (r = 0.96, bias = 0.5 g), EDV (r = 0.99, bias = -1.5 ml), ESV (r = 0.98, bias = 0.1 ml) and EF (r = 0.92, bias = -1.4%), (3) Inter-observer measurements of RV mass (r = 0.95, bias = 1.1 g), EDV (r = 0.98, bias = -1.1 ml), ESV (r = 0.98, bias = 1.2 ml) and EF (r = 0.87, bias = -1.9%), (4) Inter-study measurements of RV mass (r = 0.91, bias = -0.1 g), EDV (r = 0.96, bias = 3.8 ml), ESV (r = 0.98, bias = 0.3 ml) and EF (r = 0.90, bias = 0.9%), (5) MRI-derived right and left ventricular stroke volumes (r = 0.87). The assessment of the RV mass, volumes and function by routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI is accurate and highly reproducible. The correlation between left and RV MRI-derived stroke volumes indicates excellent coherence of simultaneous bi-ventricular volume measurements.

In-hospital and long-term outcomes after coronary angioplasty in 28 dialysis diabetic and 84 dialysis nondiabetic patients were compared with clinical outcomes after coronary angioplasty in 28 nondialysis diabetic and 84 nondialysis, nondiabetic patients matched according to clinical and angiographic characteristics. The rate of angiographic success in diabetic dialysis patients was high and similar in the 4 groups. The risk of 4-year cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction was higher in dialysis diabetics than in dialysis nondiabetics (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 2.75, p

Aim: The safety and efficacy of ad hoc PTCA has been previously reported and this approach is performed in many angioplasty centers as a routine procedure. The aim of this study is to examine whether this approach reduces the length, and cost of hospital stay. Methods and results: To determine the hospital costs we studied 2,440 PTCAs over 11 years in our institution (1990–2000). Urgent PTCA for acute coronary syndromes refractory to medical treatment were excluded. In 1809 patients (74%) angioplasty was performed immediately after coronary angiography, while separate procedures were performed in 631 patients. Indication for PTCA was unstable angina in 1342 patients (55%). In the ad hoc PTCA group, 92% of the culprit lesions were successfully treated; complications included myocardial infarction (2%), urgent bypass surgery (0.6%) and death (0.9%). The rate of combined procedure progressively increased from 54% in 1990 to 88% in 2000, with a significant decrease in the rate of complications. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic differences between combined and separate procedures, angiographic success and complication rates were not statistically different in the two groups. Mean length of hospital stay decreased all along the years, and was 45% less in the ad hoc PTCA group (11.4 ± 6.9vs18.2 ± 7.7in 1990,5.4 ± 4.3vs10.8 ± 5.7in 2000,P < 0.0001). The cost was 40% lower in the ad hoc PTCA group. For patients with stable angina, the savings were 49%, and for those with unstable angina, they were 29%. Conclusion: In the era of coronary stenting, ad hoc PTCA can be performed in most of the patients as safely and successfully as a separate procedure. It reduces the length, and the cost of hospital stay in patients with stable or unstable angina. (J Interven Cardiol 2003;16:195–199)

Atherosclerotic disease and its thrombotic complications remain the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Western society. In Australia, cardiovascular disease is responsible for one in every 2.4 (41%) deaths and is the leading single cause of mortality. The crucial final common process for the conversion of a non-occlusive, often clinically silent, atherosclerotic lesion to a potentially fatal condition is plaque disruption. The mortality associated with atherosclerotic disease relates to the acute coronary syndromes, including acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris and sudden cardiac death. There is substantial clinical, experimental and postmortem evidence demonstrating the role acute thrombosis upon a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque plays in the onset of acute coronary syndromes. Atherosclerotic plaque composition, rather than the stenotic severity, appears to be central in determining risk of both plaque rupture and subsequent thrombogenicity. In particular, a large lipid core and a thin fibrous cap render an atherosclerotic lesion susceptible or vulnerable to these complications. We are currently limited in our ability to accurately identify patients at risk for an acute coronary event. The armamentarium of diagnostic investigations, both non-invasive and invasive, currently clinically available is only able to provide us with data related to the stenotic severity of a coronary artery. The non-invasive testing includes stress-induced (exercise or pharmacological) ischaemic changes in electrical repolarisation, wall motion or myocardial radioactive-tracer uptake. The invasive test of coronary angiography, although the current 'gold standard' for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic disease, provides us with no data about the composition of the atherosclerotic lesion. However, the vast majority of acute coronary events involve a non-critically stenosed atherosclerotic lesion, and thus with currently available means of identification, these lesions would be undetected by stress testing/imaging techniques. Given the critical role that atherosclerotic lesion composition has been shown to play in the risk of both plaque rupture and subsequent thrombogenicity and, consequently, an acute coronary event, new detection techniques need to be investigated for the task of documenting atherosclerotic lesion composition. In the present review we will focus on the status of imaging modalities available for coronary artery imaging and how they may advance our understanding and management of patients with and at risk of coronary artery disease in the new millennium.

Few data are available on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in nonagenarians. In a large prospective registry on pPCI for STEMI we compared the demographics, procedural and in-hospital outcomes between nonagenarians (age ≥ 90 years) and patients aged90 years.We included 26,157 consecutive patients with pPCI in the Greater Paris Area region between 2003 and 2011. Of these, 418 (1.6%) were ≥ 90 years old. Nonagenarians (versus patients90 years) were more likely to be female (62.3% versus 22.5%, p0.0001), nonsmokers (81.6% versus 36.7%, p0.0001), in cardiogenic shock (Killip IV) upon admission (10.5% versus 4.8%, p0.001), and had significant co-morbidities. Over two-thirds of patients underwent procedures via the radial artery (61% versus 72.1%, p = 0.007). Both groups had high and similar angiographic success rates (98.1% versus 98.7%, p = 0.33). Drug-eluting stents were used less often in nonagenarians (4.4% versus 16.7%, p0.0001). Hospital mortality was significantly much higher in patients over 90 years old (24.9% versus 5.1%, p0.001) in univariate analysis. After adjustment for sex, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, triple vessel disease, drug-eluting stent use and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors use, mortality remains higher in nonagenarian patients (OR: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.26-5.71, p0.0001).In a real-world setting, we found important demographic differences in nonagenarian compared to younger patients. Despite achieving a high rate of reperfusion with pPCI using mainly radial access, similar to that achieved in younger patients, hospital mortality was higher in nonagenarians.