Search

Objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-specific risk scores have been developed based on large registry studies. Our aim was to evaluate how both surgical and novel TAVI risk scores performed in predicting all cause 30-day mortality. In addition, we wanted to explore the validity of our own previously developed model in a separate and more recent cohort. Methods: The derivation cohort included patients not eligible for open surgery treated with TAVI at the University Hospital of North Norway (UNN) and Oslo University Hospital (OUS) from February 2010 through June 2013. From this cohort, a logistic prediction model (UNN/OUS) for all cause 30-day mortality was developed. The validation cohort consisted of patients not included in the derivation cohort and treated with TAVI at UNN between June 2010 and April 2017. EuroSCORE, Logistic EuroSCORE, EurosSCORE 2, STS score, German AV score, OBSERVANT score, IRRMA score, and FRANCE-2 score were calculated for both cohorts. The discriminative accuracy of each score, including our model, was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and compared using DeLong test where P< .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The derivation cohort consisted of 218 and the validation cohort of 241 patients. Our model showed statistically significant better accuracy than all other scores in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, the FRANCE-2 had a significantly higher predictive accuracy compared to all scores except the IRRMA and STS score. Our model showed similar results. Conclusion: Existing risk scores have shown limited accuracy in predicting early mortality after TAVI. Our results indicate that TAVI-specific risk scores might be useful when evaluating patients for TAVI.

ObjectivesTo investigate whether preoperative echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular function, especially right ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters including speckle-tracking analysis, could aid in the prediction of 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic stenosis.MethodsThis is a prospective observational cohort study including 227 patients accepted for TAVI at the University Hospital of North Norway and Oslo University Hospital from February 2010 through June 2013. All patients underwent preoperative transthoracic echocardiography with retrospective speckle-tracking analysis. Primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day mortality.ResultsAll-cause 30-day mortality was 8.7 % (n = 19). Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) > 60 mm Hg (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 1.90 to 31.3), heart failure (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1 to 7.78), transapical access (HR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.3 to 11.2), peripheral artery disease (HR: 6.0, 95% CI: 2.0 to 18.0) and body mass index (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.87). C-statistic for the model generated was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98). Besides elevated SPAP, no other echocardiographic measurements were found to be an independent predictor of early mortality.ConclusionExcept for elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure, our data suggests that clinical rather than echocardiographic parameters are useful predictors of 30-day mortality after TAVI.

OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic valve implantation improves survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are ineligible for surgical valve replacement; however, not all patients benefit from the procedure. We endeavoured to identify these patients using intraoperative echocardiography and hypothesized that intraoperative left ventricular function in response to the acute afterload reduction during the procedure was related to long-term outcomes. METHODS We prospectively included 64 patients who were scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and divided them into responders and non-responders based on their left ventricular intraoperative responses to the acute afterload reduction after valve deployment. Responders were defined by increases of ≥20% in left ventricular longitudinal peak systolic velocities determined by tissue Doppler echocardiography. All patients were assessed for the following outcomes at 12 months: cardiac mortality, adverse cardiac events, quality of life, New York Heart Association class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and echocardiography. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (55%) were classified as responders and 29 patients (45%) as non-responders. Compared with responders, non-responders had higher risks of death (28 vs 9%, respectively, P = 0.04) and cardiac events (66 vs 26%, respectively, P < 0.01) during the 12-month follow-up. Significant long-term improvements in quality of life, NT-proBNP and left ventricular function were observed only in the responders. Preoperative risk stratification, intraoperative handling, aortic gradient and valve area were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative assessment of left ventricular function by tissue Doppler echocardiography predicted long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Our results suggest that a preoperative test of myocardial contractile reserve might improve risk stratification and patient selection prior to the procedure.

OBJECTIVES Left ventricular function is expected to improve after transcatheter aortic valve implantation due to the acute reduction in afterload, but does not occur in all patients. We hypothesized that the immediate intraoperative response in systolic left ventricular longitudinal motion during the procedure could be a predictor of short-term outcome. METHODS Sixty-four patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis were included. Transoesophageal 4- and 2-chamber echocardiograms were obtained immediately prior to and ∼15 min after valve implantation. Patients were defined as responders if their average left ventricular longitudinal peak systolic velocity increased by ≥20% from the preimplantation value and was related to the 3-month outcome. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were classified as responders, with an increase in the intraoperative longitudinal peak systolic velocity from an average of 2.2 ± 0.8 to 3.1 ± 1.1 cm/s (P < 0.001); the velocity was unchanged in the remaining 29 patients, who averaged 2.4 ± 1.1 cm/s. There were significantly fewer adverse cardiac events in the responder group at the 3-month follow-up (20 vs 45%, P = 0.03) and the New York Heart Association class was significantly better in the responders compared with non-responders. Responders had a significant reduction in N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels [243 (113-361) vs 163 (64-273), P = 0.004] at the 3-month follow-up, whereas non-responders did not [469 (130-858) vs 289 (157-921), P = 0.48]. CONCLUSIONS An immediate improvement in the longitudinal peak systolic velocity during the transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure predicted a better short-term outcome and may be useful in identifying patients who are at risk of a less favourable outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Objective Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients turned down for surgical aortic valve replacement is a high-risk procedure. Severe aortic stenosis is associated with impaired left ventricular longitudinal motion, and myocardial peak systolic velocity is a measure of left ventricular function in these patients. The present study aimed to quantify the acute changes in left ventricular function during the procedure by using myocardial tissue Doppler imaging and transthoracic cardiac output measurements. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Tertiary care university hospital. Participants 40 patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interventions Transesophageal 4-chamber and 2-chamber echocardiograms were performed immediately before and ~15 minutes after valve implantation. Longitudinal myocardial peak systolic velocity was obtained by tissue Doppler imaging from 8 basal segments and averaged. Cardiac output was measured by the lithium dilution method, and systemic vascular resistance index and stroke volume were calculated. Measurements and Main Results Longitudinal myocardial peak systolic velocity improved immediately after valve implantation, from –2.3±0.8 to –3.0±1.1 cm/sec (p

Myocardial dysfunction may occur during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Epicardial accelerometers have been shown to be useful in continuous monitoring of myocardial ischaemia during beating-heart surgery. We aimed to investigate whether an accelerometer can detect myocardial dysfunction during weaning from CPB.In 23 patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), a three-axis accelerometer was attached to the left ventricle and 3D velocity was calculated from the signals. Peak early systolic velocity (Vsys) and velocity at aortic valve closure (Vavc) were measured. Measurements were undertaken during normothermia with 50% bypass flow and atrial pacing (90 beats/min) before aortic cross-clamping and after cross-clamp removal. Myocardial dysfunction was defined as VsysVavc, and patients were classified as having normal function or dysfunction. Left ventricular (LV) stroke work via pulmonary artery catheter and systolic velocity by echocardiography were compared between groups and used as reference methods.The accelerometer identified a substantial proportion of patients with myocardial dysfunction during weaning from CPB, 56% of patients compared with 11% before aortic cross-clamping. Patients classified with normal myocardial function during weaning significantly improved their LV stroke work and systolic velocity by echocardiography in response to AVR, whereas those classified with dysfunction did not. Accelerometer classification of normal function predicted an increase in echocardiographic systolic velocity [r = 0.63, regression coefficient 1.98, 95% CI (0.57, 3.40) (P0.01)].The accelerometer detected myocardial dysfunction during weaning from CPB in accordance with measures obtained by echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheter.NCT01926067. https://clinicaltrials.gov/.