Search

Background Limited data are available regarding clinical outcomes of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) following the United States Food and Drug Administration approval of ViV TAVI in 2015. Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month outcomes of ViV TAVI versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve. Methods This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent ViV TAVI or repeat SAVR utilising the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2018. Primary outcomes were all-cause readmission (at 30 days and 6 months) and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke, pacemaker implantation, 30-day/6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality during readmission. Propensity score-matching (inverse probability of treatment weighting) analyses were implemented. Results Out of 6,769 procedures performed, 3,724 (55%) patients underwent ViV TAVI, and 3,045 (45%) underwent repeat SAVR. ViV TAVI was associated with lower in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.90, p=0.026) and a higher rate of 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% CI: 1.13-1.90, p=0.004) and 6-month all-cause readmission (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.14-2.10, p=0.006) compared with repeat SAVR. All secondary outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions ViV TAVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality but higher 30-day and 6-month all-cause readmission. However, there was no difference in risk of in-hospital stroke, post-procedure pacemaker implantation, MACE, and mortality during 30-day and 6-month readmission compared with repeat SAVR, suggesting that ViV TAVI can be performed safely in carefully selected patients.

Objective There is a paucity of data on how race affects the clinical presentation and short-term outcome among hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2, the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19). Methods Hospitalized patients ≥ 18 years, testing positive for COVID-19 from March 13, 2020 to May 13, 2020 in a United States (U.S.) integrated healthcare system with multiple facilities in two states were evaluated. We documented racial differences in clinical presentation, disposition, and in-hospital outcomes for hospitalized patients with COIVD-19. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to evaluate independent predictors of outcomes by race. Results During the study period, 3678 patients tested positive for COVID-19, among which 866 were hospitalized (55.4% self-identified as Caucasian, 29.5% as Black, 3.3% as Hispanics, and 4.7% as other racial groups). Hospitalization rates were highest for Black patients (36.6%), followed by other (28.3%), Caucasian patients (24.4%), then Hispanic patients (10.7%) (p

The aims of this study were to characterize the interplay between mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) phenotypes (defined by concomitant severities of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), and to assess the prognostic utility of LV-GLS in MAVD.Little is known about the way LV-GLS separates MAVD phenotypes and if it is associated with their outcomes.This observational cohort study evaluated 783 consecutive adult patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and MAVD, which was defined as coexisting with at least moderate aortic stenosis and at least moderate aortic regurgitation. We measured the conventional echocardiographic variables and average LV-GLS from apical long, 2- and 4-chamber views. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.Mean age of patients was 69 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. Mean LV-GLS was -14.7 ± 2.9%. In total, 458 patients (59%) underwent aortic valve replacement at a median period of 50 days (25th to 75th percentile range: 6 to 560 days). During a median follow-up period of 5.6 years (25th to 75th percentile range: 1.8 to 9.4 years), 391 patients (50%) died. When stratified patients into tertiles according to LV-GLS values, patients with worse LV-GLS had worse outcomes (p 0.001). LV-GLS was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio: 1.09; 95% confidential intervals: 1.04 to 1.14; p 0.001), with the relationship between LV-GLS and mortality being linear.LV-GLS is associated with all-cause mortality. LV-GLS may be useful for risk stratification in patients with MAVD.

Data on the impact of economic status on Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and MitraClip (MC) is lacking. Patients who underwent TAVI and/or MC during 2012 to 2017 were identified in the Nationwide Readmission Database and divided by zip code estimated income quartile into 4 groups (Q1 to Q4). The utilization of TAVI and/or MC was defined as the number of TAVIs and/or MCs over all admissions with an aortic and/or mitral valve disease (AVD and/or MVD) and represented per 1,000 admissions. A total of 168,853 patients underwent TAVI; 20.6% in Q1, 26.3% in Q2, 27.3% in Q3, and 25.8% in Q4, while 15,387 patients underwent MC; 22% in Q1, 26.2% in Q2, 26.3% in Q3, and 25.5% in Q4. The annual utilization of TAVIs and/or MCs increased over the study period and was generally lower with lower income. In 2012, TAVI was performed for 8.2, 8.8, 10.8, and 11.3 per 1,000 AVD admissions in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. In 2017, TAVI was performed for 54.1, 65.1, 68.6, and 71 per 1,000 AVD admissions in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. In 2014, MC was performed for 1.6, 2.1, 1.8, and 1.9 per 1,000 MVD admissions in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. In 2017, MC was performed for 5.6, 6.5, 8, and 8 per 1,000 MVD admissions in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. In-hospital mortality, stroke, and 30-day readmissions were generally comparable across groups. Lower-income patients may be underrepresented among patients undergoing TAVI and MC despite comparable outcomes. Further studies are needed to examine the etiologies behind these disparities and identify targeted strategies for its mitigation.

Background: There has been an explosion in the clinical application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) worldwide. While moderate and severe grades of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) ...

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have risk factors that predispose to thoracic aneurysmal disease (TAD) and atherosclerosis. In this study in patients with AF, we assessed the occurrence of incidental TAD and assessed if a validated predictive score used to predict AF, the CHARGE-AF score, was associated with greater aortic dimensions. We also assessed the prevalence of coronary calcification. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1,000 consecutive patients with AF undergoing chest multidetector CT during evaluation for pulmonary vein isolation. A dilated aortic root or ascending aorta (AA, dimension/ body surface area >2.05 cm/m2) were found in 195 (20%). A total of 12 (1%) had significant aortic aneurysmal enlargement of > 5.0 cm. Advancing age, a bicuspid aortic valve, hypertension, and male gender were associated with increased aortic dimensions. Aortic root dimensions increased linearly (p < 0.001) and ascending aortic dimensions increased nonlinearly across CHARGE-AF deciles (p < 0.001). Nearly two-thirds (63%) had coronary calcification, 38% of whom were not on lipid-lowering therapy. In conclusion, in patients with AF undergoing gated chest CT, 1 in 5 had previously undetected TAD, with a small proportion having significantly aneurysmal dimensions approaching surgical thresholds. Risk factors previously established to increase the propensity to develop AF are also associated with increased TAD. These findings raise the need to consider a surveillance strategy for TAD in patients with AF, particularly in those with other risk factors for aortic disease. A high prevalence of coronary calcium was also detected, representing an opportunity to optimize statin therapy in patients with AF.

The ascending aorta has a unique microstructure and biomechanical properties that allow it to absorb energy during systole and return energy during diastole (Windkessel effect). Derangements in aortic architecture can result in changes to biomechanics and inefficiencies in function. Ultimately biomechanical failure may occur resulting in aortic dissection or rupture. By measuring aortic biomechanics with either in vivo or ex vivo methods, one may be able to predict tissue failure in patients with aortic disease such as aneurysms. An understanding of the biomechanical changes that lead to these tissue-level failures may help guide therapy, disease surveillance, surgical intervention, and aid in the development of new treatments for this deadly condition.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and feasible alternative to surgery in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis regardless of the surgical risk. Conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain a common finding after TAVR due to the close proximity of the atrioventricular conduction system to the aortic root. High-grade atrioventricular block and new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) are the most commonly reported conduction abnormalities after TAVR. The overall rate of PPM implantation after TAVR varies and is related to pre-procedural and intraprocedural factors. The available literature regarding the impact of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement on morbidity and mortality is still conflicting. Pre-procedural conduction abnormalities such as right bundle branch block and LBBB have been linked with increased PPM implantation and mortality after TAVR. When screening patients for TAVR, heart teams should be aware of various anatomical and pathophysiological conditions that make patients more susceptible to increased risk of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement after the procedure. This is particularly important as TAVR has been recently approved for patients with low surgical risk. The purpose of this review is to discuss the incidence, predictors, impact, and management of the various conduction abnormalities requiring PPM implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.

OBJECTIVESRepair outcomes of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) associated with ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) are inferior to functional TR in terms of TR recurrence and right ventricular (RV) reverse remodelling. Our objective is to analyse right versus left heart reverse remodelling after surgery for IMR-associated TR.METHODSFrom 2001 to 2011, 568 patients with severe IMR underwent mitral valve surgery (repair 87%, replacement 13%), and 131 had concomitant tricuspid valve repair. Median follow-up was 3.0 years; 25% of living patients were followed up for 6.3 years. Longitudinal analysis of 1527 follow-up echocardiograms was performed to assess ventricular reverse remodelling and function.RESULTSUnlike the left heart, the right heart failed to reverse remodel (failed to recover ventricular function or halt dilatation). During follow-up after surgery, the right ventricle continued to dilate while the left ventricle regressed in size. RV ejection fraction decreased (46% at 1 month and 44% at 5 years), while left ventricular ejection fraction increased (33% and 37%, respectively). RV strain showed early (−11% at 1 month) and late (−12% at 5 years) dysfunction. Patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair had worse RV function. Mitral regurgitation remained stable after surgical intervention, and TR gradually recurred (37% moderate, 20% severe at 7 years).CONCLUSIONSSurgical treatment of IMR and TR along with revascularization failed to induce reverse remodelling of the right heart. These findings warrant further investigations to identify optimal timing and approach of intervention for IMR-associated TR with respect to RV remodelling.

Staphylococcus aureus remains the most common cause of sternal surgical site infections (SSIs). Opinions on the postoperative implications of preoperative methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) colonization currently differ. This study aimed to investigate whether MRSA carriage affects postoperative outcomes and safety of operation.A total of 1,774,811 cardiac surgical patients from 2009 to 2014 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. Among these patients, 5798 (0.33%) were MRSA carriers. Propensity-score matching was used to determine the effect of MRSA colonization on outcomes.MRSA carriers did not differ in age or sex from noncarriers, but they more often presented for urgent surgery (P .001). Among matched pairs, there was no difference in mortality (P = .76), stroke, SSIs, pneumonia, renal failure, cardiac complications, respiratory failure, or prolonged mechanical ventilation. MRSA infection (P.001), MRSA septicemia (P = 0.03), and blood transfusion (P = .003) occurred more often among MRSA carriers. There was no increase in cost (P = .12), but the hospital length of stay was longer (P = .005). Predictors of MRSA infection among carriers included age older than 85 years, rural hospital location, and diabetes. Carriers with endocarditis and drug abuse were at highest risk for MRSA infection.MRSA carriers undergoing cardiac surgery are not at higher risk for mortality or SSIs and can expect outcomes similar to those of noncarriers. Higher rates of postoperative MRSA infection and septicemia among carriers, although still very low, support the need for selective preoperative screening and prophylaxis when possible.

Background Vitamin K antagonists are the only approved oral anticoagulants for long-term prophylaxis against valve thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with a mechanical heart valve. Despite the proven efficacy and safety of anticoagulation with the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban compared with warfarin in high-risk populations including subjects with atrial fibrillation or with venous thromboembolism, it remains unknown whether patients with a mechanical heart valve can be safely managed with apixaban. The On-X Aortic Heart Valve and On-X Ascending Aortic Prosthesis with the Vascutek Gelweave Valsalva Graft may have lower rates of valve thrombosis and thromboembolism than conventional bileaflet and tilting disc valves due its unique pyrolytic carbon composition and flared inlet design. Design PROACT Xa is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial comparing apixaban with warfarin in patients with an On-X Aortic Heart Valve or On-X Ascending Aortic Prosthesis with the Vascutek Gelweave Valsalva Graft. The study will randomize approximately 1,000 patients from approximately 60 sites in North America who underwent aortic valve replacement at least 3 months prior. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receiving apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. The last randomized participant will be followed for at least 2 years. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of valve thrombosis and valve-related thromboembolism, and the primary safety outcome is major bleeding. Assuming the primary outcome occurs in warfarin-anticoagulated patients at a rate of 1.75%/patient-year, the study has more than 90% power to assess noninferiority of apixaban treatment with an absolute noninferiority margin of 1.75%/patient-year. A second co-primary analysis is to compare the hazard rate for the apixaban arm to twice the objective performance criterion for thromboembolism and valve thrombosis, that is, 3.4%/patient-year. Summary PROACT Xa will determine whether patients with an On-X Aortic Heart Valve can be anticoagulated with apixaban as an alternative to warfarin.

OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare short-term outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for pure aortic regurgitation (AR) and TAVR for aortic stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND In patients with severe pure AR for whom surgical valve replacement is infeasible, TAVR is sometimes used off-label. METHODS Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2016-2017, we retrospectively identified patients without prior valve surgery who underwent endovascular TAVR. We compared in-hospital and 30-day outcomes according to the type of aortic valve disease. RESULTS A total of 81,542 eligible patients were divided into the pure AR (n = 1,222, 1.50%), pure AS (n = 72,690, 89.1%), and AS + AR (n = 7,630, 9.36%) groups. In unadjusted analyses, the pure AR group, compared with the pure AS and AS + AR groups, showed a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (16.8% vs. 9.8% vs. 12.1%, respectively; p

This study sought to identify the optimal temperature for moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in patients undergoing elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was queried for elective hemiarch replacements using antegrade brain perfusion for aneurysmal disease (2014-2019). Generalized estimating equations and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between temperature as a continuous variable and outcomes.Elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion occurred in 3898 patients at 374 centers with a median nadir temperature of 24.9 °C (first quartile, third quartile = 22.0 °C, 27.5 °C) and median circulatory arrest time of 19 minutes (first quartile, third quartile = 14.0 minutes, 27.0 minutes). After adjustment for comorbidities, circulatory arrest time, and individual surgeon, patients cooled between 25 and 28 °C had an early survival advantage compared with 24 °C, whereas those cooled between 21 and 23 °C had higher risks of mortality compared with 24 °C. A nadir temperature of 27 °C was associated with the lowest risk-adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91). A nadir temperature of 21 °C had the highest risk of mortality (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.73). Risk of experiencing a major morbidity was elevated in patients cooled between 21 and 23 °C, with the highest risk occurring in patients cooled to 21 °C (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24).For patients with aneurysmal disease undergoing elective hemiarch with antegrade brain perfusion, circulatory arrest with a nadir temperature of 27 °C confers the greatest early survival benefit and smallest risk of postoperative morbidity.

Background Little is known about the hemodynamic performance of Edwards Sapien-3 (S3) valve after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Doppler velocity index (DVI) is a better indicator of prosthetic valve function as it is independent of valve size and flow, unlike mean gradient and peak velocity which are flow-dependent. Methods In this study, we compare outcomes based on differences in DVI among a consecutive series of patients who underwent S3 TAVR between April 2015 and December 2018. Our institutional review board approved the study and informed consents were obtained from the subjects. Results Among 921 patients who had follow-up echocardiograms within 30 days after TAVR, 60.8% had DVI ≤0.5, while 39.2% had DVI >0.5. The median 30-day DVI was 0.47 with a standard deviation of 0.11 and mean 0.49 and interquartile range 0.41–0.55. The baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between both groups with the exception of less post-dilation (36.8% vs. 47.4%; p=0.001) and greater implantation depth (2.59±1.99 vs. 2.31±1.9mm; p=0.031) with DVI ≤0.5. The rates of aortic valve calcification, pre dilation, pre-TAVR aortic regurgitation (AR) were similar. At baseline, there were no differences between both groups in mean or peak gradients or aortic velocity time integral (VTI). At 1 year, mean gradients were higher with DVI ≤0.5 (12.7±5.6 vs. 11.1±4.6 mmHg; p=0.001). DVI ≤0.5 was associated with higher peak gradients (24.2±10.2 vs. 21.4±8.7 mmHg; p=0.002), and aortic VTI (51.4±13.5 vs. 46.8±12.2 cm; p0.5 group, patients in DVI0.5 were lower (6.6% vs. 10.6%; log-rank p=0.033), however no difference was noted at both 2 years (17.3% vs. 20.1%; log-rank p=0.151), and 3 years after TAVR (30.7% vs. 31.2%; log-rank p=0.333). Conclusions DVI Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. All-cause SurvivalFigure 2. Hemodynamic Data

Background New left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common finding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can result in worse outcomes after TAVR. We aim to investigate the impact of new-onset LBBB after TAVR using the SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVR with S3 valve between April 2015 and December 2018 were included. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing LBBB, right bundle branch block, left anterior hemiblock, left posterior hemiblock, wide QRS ≥120 msec, prior permanent pacemaker (PPM), and non-transfemoral access. Results Among 612 patients, 11.4% developed new-onset LBBB upon discharge. Implantation depth was the only predictor of new-onset LBBB (OR 1.294; 95% CI 1.121–1.493; p Conclusion Among our cohort of S3 recipients, new-onset LBBB was associated with higher PPM requirement, worse LVEF, higher LV volumes and increased risk of heart failure hospitalizations. However, it did not affect mortality in the short-to-intermediate post-TAVR period. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. All-cause Survival

Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and aortic stenosis can cause obstruction to the flow of blood out of the left ventricular outflow tract into the aorta, with obstructive HCM resulting in dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and moderate or severe aortic stenosis causing fixed obstruction caused by calcific degeneration. We sought to report the characteristics and longer‐term outcomes of patients with severe obstructive HCM who also had concomitant moderate or severe aortic stenosis requiring surgical myectomy and aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results We studied 191 consecutive patients (age 67±6 years, 52% men) who underwent myectomy and aortic valve (AV) replacement (90% bioprosthesis) at our center between June 2002 and June 2018. Clinical and echo data including left ventricular outflow tract gradient and indexed AV area were recorded. The primary outcome was death. Prevalence of hypertension (63%) and hyperlipidemia (75%) were high, with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 5±4, and 70% of participants had no HCM‐related sudden death risk factors. Basal septal thickness and indexed AV area were 1.9±0.4 cm and 0.72±0.2 cm 2 /m 2 , respectively, while 100% of patients had dynamic left ventricular outflow tract gradient >50 mm Hg. At 6.5±4 years, 52 (27%) patients died (1.5% in‐hospital deaths). One‐, 2‐, and 5‐year survival in the current study sample was 94%, 91%, and 83%, respectively, similar to an age‐sex–matched general US population. On multivariate Cox survival analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.24–2.18), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.32), and right ventricular systolic pressure on preoperative echocardiography (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.57) were associated with longer‐term mortality, but traditional HCM risk factors did not. Conclusions In symptomatic patients with severely obstructive HCM and moderate or severe aortic stenosis undergoing a combined surgical myectomy and AV replacement at our center, the observed postoperative mortality was significantly lower than the expected mortality, and the longer‐term survival was similar to a normal age‐sex–matched US population.

Bradyarrhythmias leading to permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation continue to be a complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of bradyarrhythmias using an electrocardiographic (ECG) extended rhythm recording in patients pre- and post-TAVR and whether they can predict the need for PPM.This was a prospective single-center study in patients undergoing TAVR. Patients received an ECG patch for 2 weeks pre-, immediately post-, and 2-3 months post-TAVR. Caring physicians were blinded to the results of the patch except when predefined urgent arrhythmias were detected. The main outcome was the need for PPM implantation after TAVR.We enrolled 110 patients, of whom 96 underwent TAVR and were included in the final analysis. Bradyarrhythmias, defined as a pause of 3 seconds or more, occurred in 5.2%, 12.7%, and 7% of patients pre-, immediately post-, and 2-3 months post-TAVR, respectively. PPM implantation occurred in 12 patients (12.5%), of whom 9 (9.4%) underwent implantation during their index hospitalization while 3 (3.1%) required implantation postdischarge for indications other than heart block. No patients required PPM after receiving an ECG patch 2-3 months post-TAVR. Significant baseline predictors for the need for PPM included the presence of right bundle branch block and increased QRS duration. Bradyarrhythmias detected by the ECG patch did not predict the need for PPM at either the index hospitalization or the follow-up period.Bradyarrhythmias are common and can be detected with extended ECG monitoring before and after TAVR; however, in our study they did not predict the need for PPM after TAVR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03180073).

The importance of a coronary artery, based on the myocardial mass it perfuses, is well documented, but little is known about the importance of a vessel that has been bypassed and its effect on survival in the context of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting.This study determined the effect of a dominant left anterior descending (LAD) artery and important non-LAD targets on outcomes after BITA grafting.From January 1972 to January 2011, of 6,127 patients who underwent BITA grafting, 2,551 received 1 ITA grafted to the LAD and had an evaluable coronary angiogram. A dominant LAD was defined as one that was wrapped around the left ventricular apex. Non-LAD targets were graded based on their terminal reach toward the apex: important:75% (n = 1,698); and less important: ≤75% (n = 853). Mean follow-up was 14 ± 8.7 years. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for time-related mortality.A dominant LAD was present more frequently in patients with less important additional targets (51% vs. 35%; p 0.0001). A total of 179 patients (7.0%) received a second ITA to multiple targets, 77 (43%) of which were to multiple important target vessels. Unadjusted late survival was similar regardless of degree of importance of the second ITA target-77% at 15 years (p = 0.70) for the important and less important targets, respectively. In the multivariable model, grafting the second ITA to multiple important targets was associated with better long-term survival (p = 0.005). In patients with a nondominant LAD, a second ITA grafted to a less important artery was associated with higher risk of operative mortality (2.4% vs. 0.51%; p = 0.007). A saphenous vein graft to an important or less important target did not influence long-term survival.In BITA grafting, bypassing multiple important targets to maximize myocardium supplied by ITAs improved long-term survival. In patients with a nondominant LAD, selecting an important target for the second ITA lowered operative mortality.

Background: Structural valve deterioration (SVD) is the Achilles heel of bioprosthetic valves used for aortic valve replacement (AVR). SVD has been traditionally defined based upon the requirement ...

Objectives This study sought to determine whether baseline left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a subgroup of subjects at post-operative follow-up added prognostic value in patients undergoing aortic valve (AV) surgery. Background In patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and preserved LVEF, sensitive markers are needed to decide timing of AV surgery. Methods This was an observational study in 865 patients (asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic, 52 ± 15 years of age, 79% men) with ≥3+ chronic AR and preserved LVEF of ≥50% who underwent AV surgery between 2003 and 2015. All patients had baseline echocardiography (and LV-GLS imaging), whereas 285 patients underwent post-operative echocardiography (including LV-GLS). Primary outcome was mortality. Results Only 478 patients (56%) patients had preoperative LV-GLS values better than −19%, despite a mean LVEF of 57 ± 4%. At a median 38 days, 632 patients underwent AV replacement, whereas 233 patients had AV repair. At a median follow-up of 6.95 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.2 to 9.1) years, 105 patients (12%) died (2% in-hospital deaths). A higher proportion of patients with baseline LV-GLS grades worse than −19% died versus those whose LV-GLS score was better (15% vs. 10%; p Conclusions In patients with ≥3+ chronic AR and preserved LVEF undergoing AV surgery, a baseline LV-GLS value worse than −19% was associated with reduced survival. In a subgroup of patients who returned for 3- and 12-month follow-up examinations, persistently impaired LV-GLS was associated with increased mortality.

Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the incidence of worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR) following transcatheter compared with surgical AVR (TAVR, SAVR), and the impact of worsening TR on outcomes, is ill-defined. Accordingly, among patients randomized to TAVR or SAVR, we describe the differential incidence of worsening TR and its association with survival. Methods: From the PARTNER IIA trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves IIA), 1334 patients were included with baseline and 30-day postprocedure core-lab echocardiograms. Worsening TR was defined as deterioration of ≥1 grade from baseline to 30 days. Outcomes included cardiovascular and all-cause death between 30 days and 2 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations with worsening TR; survival analyses were performed to assess associations with mortality. Results: Worsening TR occurred in 17.3% (125/721) of TAVR and 27.0% (165/611) of SAVR patients. On multivariable analysis, SAVR (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.40–3.11]), female sex (odds ratio, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.44–3.42]), atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.03–2.51]), and right ventricular enlargement (odds ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.17–4.31]) were associated with worsening TR. Cardiovascular and all-cause death occurred in 9.0% (26/290) and 17.9% (52/290) of patients with worsening TR, compared with 4.8% (50/1042) and 10.9% (114/1042) without worsening TR, respectively. In patients with worsening TR, cardiovascular and all-cause death were similar in TAVR compared with SAVR, (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.55–2.16]) and (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.62–1.87]), respectively. After adjustment, worsening TR was independently associated with cardiovascular (hazard ratio, 3.62 [95% CI, 2.08–6.29]) and all-cause death (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.37–3.27]). Conclusions: Worsening TR is associated with female sex, atrial fibrillation, right ventricular enlargement, and SAVR. Regardless of mode of AVR, worsening TR is similarly associated with a poor prognosis. Future studies should focus on whether preventing or treating worsening TR improves outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01314313.

Background Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in general population and the second leading cause of mortality and morbidity in cancer survivors after recurrent malignancy in the United States. The growing awareness of cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has led to an emerging field of cardio-oncology; yet, there is limited knowledge on how to predict which patients will experience adverse cardiac outcomes. We aimed to perform unbiased cardiac risk stratification for cancer patients using our large-scale, institutional electronic medical records. Methods and findings We built a large longitudinal (up to 22 years’ follow-up from March 1997 to January 2019) cardio-oncology cohort having 4,632 cancer patients in Cleveland Clinic with 5 diagnosed cardiac outcomes: atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The entire population includes 84% white Americans and 11% black Americans, and 59% females versus 41% males, with median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54 to 71) years old. We utilized a topology-based K-means clustering approach for unbiased patient–patient network analyses of data from general demographics, echocardiogram (over 25,000), lab testing, and cardiac factors (cardiac). We performed hazard ratio (HR) and Kaplan–Meier analyses to identify clinically actionable variables. All confounding factors were adjusted by Cox regression models. We performed random-split and time-split training-test validation for our model. We identified 4 clinically relevant subgroups that are significantly correlated with incidence of cardiac outcomes and mortality. Among the 4 subgroups, subgroup I (n = 625) has the highest risk of de novo CTRCD (28%) with an HR of 3.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51 to 3.72). Patients in subgroup IV (n = 1,250) had the worst survival probability (HR 4.32, 95% CI 3.82 to 4.88). From longitudinal patient–patient network analyses, the patients in subgroup I had a higher percentage of de novo CTRCD and a worse mortality within 5 years after the initiation of cancer therapies compared to long-time exposure (6 to 20 years). Using clinical variable network analyses, we identified that serum levels of NT-proB-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and Troponin T are significantly correlated with patient’s mortality (NT-proBNP > 900 pg/mL versus NT-proBNP = 0 to 125 pg/mL, HR = 2.95, 95% CI 2.28 to 3.82, p < 0.001; Troponin T > 0.05 μg/L versus Troponin T ≤ 0.01 μg/L, HR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.34, p < 0.001). Study limitations include lack of independent cardio-oncology cohorts from different healthcare systems to evaluate the generalizability of the models. Meanwhile, the confounding factors, such as multiple medication usages, may influence the findings. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated that the patient–patient network clustering methodology is clinically intuitive, and it allows more rapid identification of cancer survivors that are at greater risk of cardiac dysfunction. We believed that this study holds great promise for identifying novel cardiac risk subgroups and clinically actionable variables for the development of precision cardio-oncology., Yuan Hou and co-workers investigate risk of cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients., Author summary Why was this study done? An increasing number of oncology patients are facing cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) risk, leading to the emerging field of cardio-oncology (also known as onco-cardiology); however, there are limited clinical guidelines in terms of how to prevent and treat for the new cardiotoxicity among cancer survivors. Development of novel clinical tools would offer unique opportunities for precision cardio-oncology by utilizing the large-scale, longitudinal patient data from healthcare systems. What did the researchers do and find? We developed a longitudinal patient–patient network clustering methodology for cardiac risk stratification in cancer patients during anticancer therapies. We identified 4 clinically relevant subgroups that are statistically significantly correlated with incidence of cardiac outcomes and all-cause mortality. Using longitudinal patient–patient network analyses (over 20 years’ follow-up), we showed crucial roles of early cardiovascular care in improving quality of life of cancer survivors and reducing incidence of CTRCD. We identified multiple clinically relevant predictors (including Troponin T and NT-proB-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)) that are significantly correlated with incidence of cardiac outcomes and patients’ mortality, which offers actionable biomarkers for rapid risk assessment of cardiac dysfunction during cardio-oncology clinical practices. What do these findings mean? Our findings suggest that an unbiased, systems-based network analysis of large-scale, longitudinal patient data is more interpretable, visualizing the decision boundary to cardiac risk stratification for patients before, during, and after cancer treatment. Troponin T and NT-proBNP offer clinically actionable biomarkers for cardiac risk stratification in cardio-oncology clinical practices. Extended independent cohort validations are needed before the predictors are introduced to clinical implementation.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to examine the association of hospital procedural volume with the incidence and outcomes of surgical bailout (SB) in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND SB is required for serious complications during or after TAVR. It remains unclear whether hospital experiences affect the incidence and outcomes of SB. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients who underwent endovascular TAVR using the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2012-2017. We examined the association of annual hospital procedural volume (annual number of endovascular TAVR cases in each hospital in each year) with the incidence and in-hospital mortality of SB using multivariable logistic regressions and restricted cubic splines. RESULTS Among 82,764 eligible patients, the incidence of SB was 0.95% (n = 789) and decreased from 2012 to 2017 (from 2.66% to 0.49%; Ptrend

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR). BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease is common in patients who undergo aortic valve replacement. However, little is known about differences in clinical features of post-TAVR or post-SAVR AMI. METHODS We retrospectively identified post-TAVR or post-SAVR (including isolated and complex SAVR) patients admitted with AMI using the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2012-2017. Incidence, invasive strategy (coronary angiography or revascularization), and in-hospital outcomes were compared between post-TAVR and post-SAVR AMIs. RESULTS The incidence of 180-day AMI was higher post-TAVR than post-SAVR (1.59% vs. 0.72%; p

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is an ongoing viral pandemic marked by increased risk of thrombotic events. However, the role of platelets in the elevated observed thrombotic risk in COVID-19 and utility of antiplatelet agents in attenuating thrombosis is unknown. We aimed to determine if the antiplatelet effect of aspirin may mitigate risk of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and venous thromboembolism in COVID-19. We evaluated 22,072 symptomatic patients tested for COVID-19. Propensity-matched analyses were performed to determine if treatment with aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affected thrombotic outcomes in COVID-19. Neither aspirin nor NSAIDs affected mortality in COVID-19. Thus, aspirin does not appear to prevent thrombosis and death in COVID-19. The mechanisms of thrombosis in COVID-19, therefore, appear distinct and the role of platelets as direct mediators of SARS-CoV-2-mediated thrombosis warrants further investigation.

Outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge improves continuity of care and reduces readmissions, but rates of follow-up remain low. It is not known whether electronic medical record (EMR)-based tools improve follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine if an EMR-based order to secure cardiology follow-up appointments at hospital discharge would improve follow-up rates and hospital readmission rates. A pre-post interventional study was conducted and evaluated 39,209 cardiovascular medicine discharges within an academic center between 2012 and 2017. Follow-up rates and readmission rates were compared during 2 years prior to EMR-order implementation (pre-order era 2012–2013, n = 12,852) and 4 years after implementation (EMR-order era 2014–2017, n = 26,357). The primary endpoint was 90-day cardiovascular follow-up rates within our health system. In the overall cohort, the mean age of patients was 69.3 years [SD 14.7] and 60.7% (n = 23,827) were male. In the pre-order era, 90-day follow-up was 56.7 ± 0.4% (7286 of 12,852) and increased to 67.9 ± 0.3% (17,888 of 26,357, P P P = 0.016) in the EMR-order era. An EMR-based appointment order for follow-up appointment scheduling was associated with increased cardiovascular medicine follow-up, but was not associated with an observed reduction in 30-day readmission rates.

Although coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) maximizes long-term survival, knowledge of the effect of different right ITA (RITA) inflow configurations on graft patency is limited. We have compared RITA occlusion among these configurations and identified its risk factors while adjusting for outflow coronary target location.From January 1972 to January 2016, of 7092 patients undergoing bilateral ITA grafting at a single center, 1331 received one ITA to the left anterior descending coronary artery and had one or more evaluable postoperative coronary angiograms: 835 (63%) in situ, 496 free RITA grafts (311 [63%] originating from aorta; 98 [20%] left ITA [LITA], 76 [15%] saphenous vein graft, 11 [2%] radial graft). RITA occlusion reported on 1983 angiograms performed a median of 5.8 years later was estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects longitudinal modeling.RITA patency was 90% at 1 year, 87% at 5 years, and 86% at 10 and 15 years. At 15 years, in situ RITA patency was 91% and free RITA patency from aorta was 91%, LITA 89%, and saphenous vein graft 77%. After adjusting for coronary target location and degree of stenosis, occlusion was similar in free RITAs from aorta (P = .15), LITA (P = .4), saphenous vein grafts (P = .13), and in situ RITAs. However, RITAs grafted to the left anterior descending coronary artery had fewer occlusions (P.001), with patency similar to LITAs.Among patients with bilateral ITA grafting requiring interval coronary angiography, long-term RITA patency was high and independent of its inflow configuration. Therefore, priority should be a RITA configuration optimizing its reach to important coronary targets, including the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Background: The conventional method of implanting balloon-expandable SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve results in a final 70:30 or 80:20 ratio of the valve in the aorta:left ventricular outflow tract with published rates of permanent pacemaker around 10%. We sought to evaluate whether higher implantation of S3 reduces conduction abnormalities including the need for permanent pacemaker. Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using S3 between April 2015 and December 2018 and compared outcomes with typical valve deployment strategy to our more contemporary high deployment technique (HDT). We excluded patients with nontransfemoral access or valve-in-valve. Results: Among 1028 patients, HDT was performed in 406 patients (39.5%). Mean implantation depth under the noncoronary cusp was significantly smaller with HDT compared with conventional technique (1.5±1.6 versus 3.2±1.9 mm; P P =0.216). Thirty-day permanent pacemaker rates were lower with HDT (5.5% versus 13.1%; P P P P =0.804), or moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation (1% versus 2.7%; P =0.081) at 1 year. HDT was associated with slightly higher 1-year mean gradients (13.1±6.2 versus 11.8±4.9 mm Hg; P =0.042) and peak gradients (25±11.9 versus 22.5±9 mm Hg; P =0.026). However, Doppler velocity index was similar (0.47±0.15 versus 0.48±0.13; P =0.772). Conclusions: Our novel technique for balloon-expandable S3 valve positioning consistently achieves higher implantation resulting in substantial reduction in conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement without compromising procedural safety or valve hemodynamics. Operators should consider this as an important technique to improve patient outcomes.

IMPORTANCE The impact of pre-existing cognitive dysfunction on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To study the association between dementia and post-TAVR outcomes. DESIGN Cohort study with propensity-score matching was conducted using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. EXPOSURES History of dementia at the time of undergoing TAVR. MAIN OUTCOMES All-cause in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury, post-procedural vascular complications, post-procedural pacemaker implantation, length of stay, in-hospital delirium, and discharge disposition in patients with and without dementia undergoing TAVR. RESULTS Of 57,805 patients undergoing TAVR, 2910 (5.0%) had a diagnosis of dementia. Propensity-score matching yielded 2895 matched pairs of patients. TAVR was associated with an increased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (14.7% vs 8.6%, odd ratio (OR) 1.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.63]; p

Introduction: New permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement has been linked with left ventricular dysfunction after TAVR. Objective: We sought to study the impact of new PPM on echocardiographic outcomes after TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve. Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with S3 valve at the Cleveland Clinic between April 2015 and December 2018. Patients with prior PPM were excluded. Echocardiograms were reviewed to determine left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic volume index (LVEDVi), left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi), left ventricular dimension during diastole (LVDd), posterior wall thickness during diastole (PWTd), interventricular septum during diastole (IVSd), right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) grade. Results: Among 886 patients, the rate of 30-day PPM was 10.2%. Baseline LVEF was similar between new PPM and no PPM (55.4 ± 12.7% vs. 57.2 ± 11.2%; p = 0.188). There were no differences in the other studied echocardiographic parameters at baseline. Among patients with new PPM, LVEF was lower at both 30 days (54.4 ± 11.3% vs. 58.4 ± 10.1%; p = 0.001) and 1 year (54.2 ± 12% vs. 59.1 ± 11.3%; p = 0.009) compared to no PPM with Δ LVEF -0.9% vs. +1.4%; p = 0.023. There were no differences in LVEDVi (52 ± 20.8 vs. 48.3 ± 17.6; p = 0.186) at 1 year. LVESVi was higher with new PPM (24.8 ± 16.1 vs. 20.2 ± 10.9; p = 0.038). However, Δ LVESVi was similar between the 2 groups (-1.6 vs. -2.6; p = 0.517). There were no differences in RVSP (38.9 ± 14.1 vs. 40 ± 14; p = 0.58). LVIDd, PWTd, IVSd and IVC diameter also did not show variations whether patients were paced or not. Moderate to severe TR rates were similar as well (17.7% vs. 21.5%; p = 0.407). Conclusion: Among S3 TAVR recipients, new pacing requirement had a detrimental impact on LVEF at both 30 days and 1 year. However, it did not seem to affect the other studied echocardiographic outcomes after TAVR.

Introduction: Pre-existing atrial fibrillation has been linked with poor outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objective: We sought to study the impact of baseline atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) on outcomes after TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve. Methods: All consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR with S3 valve at the Cleveland Clinic between April 2015 and December 2018 were included. Results: We included 1028 consecutive patients. Overall, the mean age of our study population was 81 ± 8.9 years, 58.8% were males, 95.8% were Caucasians. Pre-existing AF was present in 432 patients (42%). STS risk score was higher with AF compared to no AF (6.7 ± 3.8% vs. 5.4 ± 3.4%; p < 0.001). Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower with AF (54% vs. 58%; p < 0.001). The rates of 30-day permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation were similar between AF and no AF (11.4% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.326), as were the rates of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) at discharge (9.6% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.901). There was also no difference in stroke rates at 30 days between the 2 groups (1.6% vs. 1%; p = 0.385). Post-TAVR mild or greater aortic regurgitation (AR) was higher with AF compared to no AF (21.5% vs. 16%; p = 0.022). LVEF was lower with AF at both 30 days (56% vs. 58.5%; p < 0.001) and 1 year (56% vs. 59%; p < 0.001). However, the change in LVEF (Δ) after TAVR was similar between AF and no AF (+1.1% vs. +1.4%; p = 0.624). At 2 years, all-cause death was higher with AF (22.9% vs. 12.8%; log-rank p = 0.011). There was no mortality difference between persistent versus paroxysmal AF (log-rank p = 0.714). Conclusions: Among our S3 TAVR patients, AF did not affect PPM, new-onset LBBB or stroke rates after the procedure. AF was associated with higher mild or greater AR at 30 days, as well as lower LVEF at both 30 days and 1 year compared to no AF. There was significantly higher all-cause mortality in the AF group at 2 years after TAVR.

Background There is a paucity of data regarding the optimum timing of PCI in relation to TAVR. Objective We compared the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with those who received PCI with/after TAVR. Methods In this multicenter study, we pooled all consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at three high volume centers. Results Among 3,982 patients who underwent TAVR, 327 (8%) patients underwent PCI within 1 year before TAVR, 38 (1%) had PCI the same day as TAVR and 15 (0.5%) had PCI within 2 months after TAVR. Overall, among patients who received both PCI and TAVR (n = 380), history of previous CABG (HR:0.501; p = .001), higher BMI at TAVR (HR:0.970; p = .038), and statin therapy after TAVR (HR:0.660, p = .037) were independently associated with lower MACCE while warfarin therapy after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of MACCE (HR:1.779, p = .017). Patients who received PCI within 1 year before TAVR had similar baseline demographics, STS scores, clinical risk factors when compared to patients receiving PCI with/after TAVR. Both groups were similar in PCI (Syntax Score, ACC/AHA lesion class) and TAVR (valve types, access) related variables. There were no significant differences in terms of MACCE (log rank p = .550), all-cause mortality (log rank p = .433), strokes (log rank p = .153), and repeat PCI (log rank p = .054) in patients who underwent PCI with/after TAVR when compared to patients who received PCI before TAVR. Conclusion Among patients who underwent both PCI and TAVR, history of CABG, higher BMI, and statin therapy had lower, while those discharged on warfarin, had higher adverse event rates. Adverse events rates were similar regardless of timing of PCI.

As the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands to varying patient populations, impacting the landscape of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), this study sought to assess volume and performance trends of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United States during 2012–2017. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent endovascular/transapical TAVI, isolated SAVR, or complex aortic valve surgery between 2012 and 2017. Temporal trends in annual case volume, admission costs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day readmission were evaluated. Of 624,303 patients (median age 72 years) who received AVR, 387,011 (62%) were men. Among these patients, 170,521 (27%) underwent TAVI and 453,782 (73%) underwent SAVR with 299,398 isolated and 154,384 complex aortic valve surgery. TAVI patients were significantly older and higher risk compared with SAVR patients. From 2012 to 2017, the annual number of TAVI increased from 8,295 to 55,168 whereas SAVR volume remained remarkably stable. Patients who underwent AVR demonstrated significant improvements in mortality, stroke, duration of hospitalization, and 30-day readmission. In conclusion, this large contemporary analysis reports the considerable growth of AVR in the United States. It remains unequivocal that the treatment of aortic stenosis is improving overall with reduced mortality following AVR, highlighting the effectiveness of various process improvements such as newer valves, enhanced patient selection, and the interdisciplinary Heart Team approach.

To evaluate the temporal relations of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients referred to cardio-oncology and describe the impact of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors on outcomes. All adult oncology patients referred to the cardio-oncology service at the Cleveland Clinic from January 2011 to June 2018 were included in the study. Comprehensive clinical information were collected. The impact on survival of temporal trends of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients were assessed with a Cox proportional hazards model and time-varying covariate adjustment for confounders. In total, 6,754 patients were included in the study (median age, 57 years; [interquartile range, 47 to 65 years]; 3,898 women [58%]; oncology history [60% - breast cancer, lymphoma, and leukemia]). Mortality and diagnosis of clinical cardiac disease peaked around the time of chemotherapy. 2,293 patients (34%) were diagnosed with a new cardiovascular risk factor after chemotherapy, over half of which were identified in the first year after cancer diagnosis. Patients with preexisting and post-chemotherapy cardiovascular disease had significantly worse outcomes than patients that did not develop any cardiovascular disease (p < 0.0001). The highest 1-year hazard ratios (HR) of post-chemotherapy cardiovascular disease were significantly associated with male (HR 1.81; 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 2.11; p < 0.001] and diabetes [HR 1.51; 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.81; p < 0.001]. In conclusion, patients referred to cardio-oncology, first diagnosis of cardiac events peaked around the time of chemotherapy. Those with preexisting or post-chemotherapy cardiovascular disease had worse survival. In addition to a high rate of cardiovascular risk factors at baseline, risk factor profile worsened over course of follow-up.

Background The effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on kidney function stage in patients with aortic stenosis remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that in some patients, TAVR results in improved kidney function by alleviating cardiorenal syndrome. Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess change in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage following TAVR, identify variables associated with pre- and post-TAVR estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and assess association of post-TAVR eGFR with mortality. Methods Patients (n = 5,190) receiving TAVR in the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 1, 2, and PARTNER 2 S3 trials between April 2007 and October 2014 were included. Pre-TAVR and procedural variables associated with post-TAVR eGFR, change in CKD stage at ≤7 days post-TAVR, and association of post-TAVR eGFR on intermediate-term mortality were assessed. Results At baseline, CKD stage ≥2 was present in 91% of patients. CKD stage either improved or was unchanged following TAVR in the majority of patients (77% stage 1, 90% stage 2, 89% stage 3A, 94% stage 3B, and 99% stage 4). Progression to CKD stage 5 occurred in 1 (0.035%) of 2,892 patients within 7 days post-TAVR. Of 3,546 patients in whom data were available, 70 (2.0%) underwent post-TAVR dialysis. Higher pre-TAVR eGFR and transfemoral approach were strongly associated with higher post-TAVR eGFR. Lower baseline and longitudinal post-TAVR eGFR were associated with lower intermediate-term survival. Conclusions In patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR, even with baseline impaired eGFR, CKD stage is more likely to stay the same or improve than worsen. Aortic stenosis may contribute to cardiorenal syndrome that improves with TAVR.

Background Concurrent presence of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is termed mixed aortic valve disease ( MAVD ). Although multiple articles have addressed patients with “isolated” aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation, the natural history, impact, and outcomes of MAVD are not well defined. Here, we evaluate long‐term outcomes in patients with MAVD and cardiovascular adaptations to chronic MAVD . Methods and Results This observational cohort study evaluated 862 adult patients (56.8% male) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and at least moderate aortic regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was based on treatment modality (aortic valve replacement [ AVR ] versus medical management). A regression analysis of longitudinal echocardiographic parameters was performed to assess the natural history of MAVD . Mean age was 68±15 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±5%. At 4.6 years (25th–75th percentile range, 1.0–8.7), 58.6% of patients underwent an AVR and 48.8% patients died. In both unadjusted and adjusted Cox survival analysis, AVR was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI , 0.34–0.51, P AVR persisted when stratifying the cohort by symptom status and baseline aortic valve area (log rank, P CI , 0.32–0.50; P P P P P Conclusions MAVD confers a high risk of all‐cause mortality. However, AVR significantly reduces this risk independent of aortic valve area, symptom status, and after controlling for confounding variables.

OBJECTIVES We investigated the hemodynamic durability of the transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) using the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria. BACKGROUND The updated VARC-2 consensus criteria combine flow-dependent and flow-independent echocardiographic parameters for hemodynamic assessment of TAVR. Data on the hemodynamic durability of TAV and clinical risk factors associated with valve hemodynamic deterioration (VHD) are lacking. METHODS All patients (n = 276) who received TAV between 2006 and 2012 and had ≥2 follow-up echocardiograms were studied. RESULTS During a median follow up period of 3.3 (1.8-4.4) years, 8 patients (3%) developed moderate to severe valve stenosis per the VARC-2 criteria, while 20 had mild stenosis. In a Cox proportional hazards model analysis, moderate to severe stenosis by VARC-2 criteria was associated with younger age (P = 0.03, HR 0.94), absence of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (P = 0.026, HR 0.18), and lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = 0.006, HR 0.94). Longitudinal analysis using a mixed effect model showed that presence of stenosis by VARC-2 criteria was associated with an increase in aortic valve mean gradient (P

Background Stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) occurs with an incidence of 4–11% and is a particularly devastating adverse event associated with the procedure. Several cerebral protection devices (CPD) have been developed to prevent cerebrovascular events during TAVR. While most studies have shown CPD to be associated with decreased number and volume of lesions on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging , the clinical benefit of these devices remains uncertain. Methods We aimed to use meta-analysis techniques to study the clinical safety and efficacy of these CPD in prospective randomized and non-randomized studies. Data was summarized as Mantel-Haenszel relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the Higgins' I2 statistic to evaluate heterogeneity. Results We found no evidence of difference between patients with and without CPD [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.40–1.21)] for the primary composite outcome of stroke and mortality at 30 days. The two groups were also comparable in peri-procedural strokes [RR 0.53 (95% CI 0.27–1.07)], stroke at 30 days [RR 0.69(95% CI 0.38–1.26)], mortality [RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.22–1.59) at 30 days, AKI [RR 0.68(95% CI 0.28–1.62)], major bleeding [RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.26–1.18)], life threating bleeding [0.54 (95% CI 0.19–1.53)] and major vascular complications [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.52–1.24)]. The risk of strokes within the first week of TAVR was significantly lower in the CPD group [0.56(95% CI 0.33–0.96)]. Conclusion CPD are associated with a decreased incidence of strokes within 1 week of follow-up without showing any evidence of increased risk of other peri-procedural adverse events.

Background Postoperative brain injury is a cause of mortality and morbidity in patients who undergo thoracic aortic replacement. Chronic microvascular white matter ischemic change (WMIC) has been shown to be associated with acute brain infarction in the general population. WMIC has also been shown to be an independent predictor of non-focal neurocognitive changes, generalized seizures, and temporary neurologic dysfunction in patients who undergo thoracic aortic replacement. The aim of this study is to determine if WMIC is a risk factor for acute brain infarction in patients who undergo thoracic aortic replacement. Methods A case-control study of patients who underwent thoracic aortic replacement between 2001 and 2014 were reviewed for neurological changes after surgery and acute brain infarction on postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with neurological changes were matched with control patients who underwent thoracic aortic replacement and had postoperative neurological symptoms without acute brain infarctions. Acute infarction was re-assessed by reviewing DWI sequences on postoperative MRI. WMIC was assessed on FLAIR and T2WI sequences on both preoperative and postoperative MRI. Logistic regression was performed assessing the relationship of WMIC and acute ischemic infarction. Results 5171 patients underwent thoracic aortic replacement; 179 had postoperative neurological changes, and of those 53 patients had acute brain infarction on postoperative DWI. Patients with deep WMIC were more likely to have acute DWI infarctions after thoracic aortic replacement (P = 0.023). Conclusion Our matched retrospective case-controlled study shows deep WMIC to be a predictor of acute brain infarction on DWI after thoracic aortic replacement.

Background: Despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation (MR) often have reduced exercise capacity. In asymptomatic patients with ≥3+ primary MR undergoing rest-stress echocardiography (RSE), we sought to evaluate the incremental impact of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) on exercise capacity. Methods: A total of 660 asymptomatic patients with ≥3+ primary MR, non-dilated LV and LVEF ≥60% (mean age, 57±14 years, 66% men, body mass index or BMI 25±4 kg/m 2 ) who underwent RSE at our center between 2001 and 2013 were included. Standard RSE data were obtained. Average resting LV-GLS was measured using Velocity Vector Imaging. Results: Mean mitral effective regurgitant orifice, resting right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and LV-GLS were 0.45±0.2 cm 2 , 31±12 mmHg and −21.7%±2%, respectively; 28% had flail mitral leaflet. Mean metabolic equivalents (METs) and post-stress RVSP were 9.9±3, and 46±17 mmHg; 28% achieved

Balloon predilation (BPD) has been an integral part of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) since inception. We sought to investigate the effect of avoiding BPD on outcomes of TAVI across different valve types. Articles were included if outcomes of TAVI without BPD were reported. Pooled meta-analysis used a random effects model and reported odds ratios (ORs). Twenty-one studies with 10,752 patients were pooled for analysis. Age and gender were well matched between NoBPD and BPD groups. There was no difference in mortality, stroke, bleeding, and acute kidney injury. NoBPD showed lower pacemaker rates (OR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.97), vascular complications (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95), and early safety at 30 days (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99). For balloon-expandable valves, lower rates of aortic regurgitation (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) and early safety (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.85) were seen. Self-expanding valves showed lower pacemaker (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97) and vascular complications (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99), with a trend toward higher postdilation (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.67). TAVI without BPD is safe and effective. NoBPD is associated with fewer vascular complications, less aortic regurgitation, and fewer pacemaker requirements and composite early safety end points.

Background: Preoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been studied in high-risk cohorts. This study examines the outcomes of preoperative MR (≥ moderate) in a larger, intermediate-risk cohort. Methods: The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 2A Trial randomized 2032 intermediate-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis to TAVR or SAVR. An ad-hoc analysis was performed on 1738 patients with baseline MR echocardiographic data. Patients were analyzed according to the degree of preoperative MR (≥ moderate versus ≤ mild). Results: At baseline, ≥ moderate MR was reported in 300 patients (17%). At 30 days, ≥ moderate MR had improved in 47% to ≤ mild. Thirty-day mortality was higher in SAVR patients with ≥ moderate MR (8.0 versus 3.5%; p = 0.01), but this difference was not seen in TAVR (2.7 vs. 3.1%; p = 0.78). At 2-years, the combined outcome of death (20.5 vs. 16.3%; p = 0.07), stroke (12.9 vs. 9.0%; p = 0.06), and rehospitalization (22.0 versus 17.4%; p = 0.06) was higher in the ≥ moderate MR (40.4 vs. 32.6%; p = 0.009), and similar between SAVR and TAVR (39.8 vs. 41.0%; p = 0.89). Conclusions: Significant MR is prevalent in patients with severe AS and affects clinical outcomes after both TAVR and SAVR. SAVR patients with MR have high early risk, but the increased risk of death/stroke/rehospitalization becomes similar in both groups over time. Improvement in MR is common, especially in patients with lower ejection fraction and larger left-ventricular dimensions.