Search

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered. ispartof: JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION vol:40 issue:10 pages:1859-1875 ispartof: location:Netherlands status: published

Objectives Resting heart rate (HR) taken in the office has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population, hypertension and heart failure. It is unknown whether 24-h oscillographic pulse rate measurement as an approximation of HR derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) associates with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients. Methods We evaluated ABPM recordings from 56 901 patients with complete 3373 421 HR measures entering the final analysis from the Spanish Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry for a median follow-up time of 5.1 years. We explored the association of office HR, mean 24-h HR, mean day HR, mean night HR as well as day-night HR differences, morning mean HR, morning HR surge and night peak HR to all-cause death, cardiovascular death and noncardiovascular death. Data were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, analysis of variance and chi-square test. Results The Spanish ABPM Registry recorded data in 223 primary care centers in Spain from 2004 until 31 December 2014 at the end of recruitment. Office HR was 3.5 bpm higher than mean 24-h HR, office mean HR versus mean night was 10.4 bpm higher and mean day versus mean night HR 9.3 bpm higher, while there were no relevant difference between office and mean day HR. Office mean, 24-h day and night HR more than 90 bpm were associated with an increased risk for all-cause and noncardiovascular death, whereas for cardiovascular death only mean night HR was predictive. The strongest association to all-cause death was observed with mean night HR [hazard ratio 3.80 (2.87-5.03)], mean 24-h HR [2.85 (2.30-3.54)] and mean day HR [2.22 (1.83-2.70)]. Day-night dipping of more than 8 bpm was associated with a 20% lesser risk on all-cause, cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death. Results were robust after adjusting for relevant risk indicators. Conclusion HR parameters derived from ABPM provide important information, in particular association with death by mean night HR, mean 24-h HR and reduced day-night HR dipping less than 8 bpm superior to office HR.

AimsTo explore the modifying effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on outcomes with finerenone across a wide spectrum of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the pooled analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD.Materials and methodsPatients with T2D and CKD treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone on a cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and a kidney composite outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline, or renal death), change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and safety were analysed by GLP-1RA use.ResultsOf 13 026 patients, 944 (7.2%) used GLP-1RAs at baseline. Finerenone reduced the risk of the cardiovascular composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.11 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.96 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.63) and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45–1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.89 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.79) irrespective of baseline GLP-1RA use. Reduction in UACR with finerenone at Month 4 was –38% in patients with baseline GLP-1RA use compared with –31% in those without GLP-1RA use (P-interaction = 0.03). Overall safety and incidence of hyperkalaemia were similar, irrespective of GLP-1RA use.ConclusionsThe cardiorenal benefits of finerenone on composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and UACR reduction in patients with CKD and T2D appear to be maintained, regardless of GLP-1RA use. Subsequent studies are needed to investigate any potential benefit of this combination. Aims: To explore the modifying effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on outcomes with finerenone across a wide spectrum of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the pooled analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD. Materials and methods: Patients with T2D and CKD treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone on a cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and a kidney composite outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline, or renal death), change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and safety were analysed by GLP-1RA use. Results: Of 13 026 patients, 944 (7.2%) used GLP-1RAs at baseline. Finerenone reduced the risk of the cardiovascular composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–1.11 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.96 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.63) and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45–1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.89 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction = 0.79) irrespective of baseline GLP-1RA use. Reduction in UACR with finerenone at Month 4 was –38% in patients with baseline GLP-1RA use compared with –31% in those without GLP-1RA use (P-interaction = 0.03). Overall safety and incidence of hyperkalaemia were similar, irrespective of GLP-1RA use. Conclusions: The cardiorenal benefits of finerenone on composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and UACR reduction in patients with CKD and T2D appear to be maintained, regardless of GLP-1RA use. Subsequent studies are needed to investigate any potential benefit of this combination.

La pandemia producida por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha obligado, en muchos casos a sustituir la consulta presencial por la consulta telemática para reducir el riesgo de contagio asociado a la presencia de pacientes en los centros sanitarios. Este cambio puede representar una oportunidad para una comunicación diferente y más eficiente entre profesionales y pacientes, permitiendo mejorar la accesibilidad a la atención médica y un abordaje más sistemático e integral a los pacientes con hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular. No obstante, se necesitan herramientas organizativas que faciliten la comunicación entre pacientes y profesionales, específicamente con intercambio de datos clínicos que favorezcan la monitorización remota de las variables asociadas a la hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular (presión arterial, peso, talla, variables analíticas…) y permitan realizar un seguimiento adecuado en aspectos como la adherencia a los tratamientos, estilos de vida y factores de riesgo. Todo ello sería deseable que fuera realizado por equipos multidisciplinares, tanto de atención primaria como hospitalaria y farmacia comunitaria, con una coordinación adecuada del cuidado en este tipo de pacientes. Este documento de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) trata de dar las claves para mejorar la calidad asistencial de las consultas telemáticas de los pacientes con hipertensión y riesgo cardiovascular, proporcionar criterios básicos de atención telemática o presencial y sistematizar el contenido de estas. Así mismo se plantean los criterios de seguimiento por los diferentes profesionales.

Finerenone is a selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist with a short half-life. Its effects on cardiorenal outcomes were thought to be mediated primarily via nonhemodynamic pathways, but office blood pressure (BP) measurements were insufficient to fully assess hemodynamic effects. This analysis assessed the effects of finerenone on 24-h ambulatory BP in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.ARTS-DN (NCT01874431) was a phase 2b trial that randomized 823 patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30-90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 to placebo or finerenone (1.25-20 mg once daily in the morning) administered over 90 days. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) over 24 h was performed in a subset of 240 patients at screening, Day 60, and Day 90.Placebo-adjusted change in 24-h ABPM systolic BP (SBP) at Day 90 was -8.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.6 to 0.1) for finerenone 10 mg (n = 27), -11.2 mmHg (95% CI, -18.8 to -3.6) for finerenone 15 mg (n = 34), and -9.9 mmHg (95% CI, -17.7 to -2.0) for finerenone 20 mg (n = 31). Mean daytime and night-time SBP recordings were similarly reduced and finerenone did not increase the incidence of SBP dipping. Finerenone produced a persistent reduction in SBP over the entire 24-h interval.Finerenone reduced 24-h, daytime, and night-time SBP. Despite a short half-life, changes in BP were persistent over 24 h with once-daily dosing in the morning.

Background: Chronic kidney disease is frequently associated with hypertension and poorly controlled blood pressure can lead to chronic kidney disease progression. Finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, significantly improves cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. This analysis explored the relationship between office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal outcomes with finerenone in FIDELIO-DKD trial (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease). Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 to 2 receiving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade, were randomized to finerenone or placebo. For this analysis, patients (N=5669) were grouped by baseline office SBP quartiles. Results: Finerenone reduced office SBP across the baseline office SBP quartiles, including patients with baseline office SBP of >148 mm Hg. Overall, patients with lower baseline office SBP quartile and greater declines from baseline in SBP were associated with better cardiorenal outcomes. The risk of primary kidney and key secondary cardiovascular composite outcomes was consistently reduced with finerenone versus placebo irrespective of baseline office SBP quartiles ( P for interaction 0.87 and 0.78, respectively). A time-varying analysis revealed that 13.8% and 12.6% of the treatment effect with finerenone was attributed to the change in office SBP for the primary kidney composite outcome and the key secondary cardiovascular outcome, respectively. Conclusions: In FIDELIO-DKD, cardiorenal outcomes improved with finerenone irrespective of baseline office SBP. Reductions in office SBP accounted for a small proportion of the treatment effect on cardiorenal outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02540993.

Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS/Fondos FEDER (PI17/01093, PI17/01193, CP15/00129, CPII20/00022, PI18/01366, PI19/00588, PI19/00815, PI20/00763, DTS18/00032) ERA-PerMedJTC2018 (KIDNEY ATTACK AC18/00064 and PERSTIGAN AC18/00071, ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN RD016/0009) Sociedad Española de Nefrología, FRIAT, Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina (B2017/BMD-3686 CIFRA2- CM) 35.855 JCR (2021) Q1, 3/143 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems 4.118 SJR (2021) Q1, 9/356 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2021 UEM

Resistant hypertension (RH) is related to increased risk for cardiovascular events. We aimed to evaluate the risk of total and cardiovascular mortality associated with RH in comparison to controlled hypertension, as well as in true versus “white-coat” RH. From the mortality data of the Spanish ABPM Registry, including 35119 treated patients, we identified 9408 RH, defined as office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg while treated with ≥ 3 drugs (8577 patients), or treated and controlled (office BP < 140/90 mmHg) with ≥ 4 drugs (831 patients). They were compared against 8144 patients treated with ≤ 3 drugs and having normal office BP. In addition, among 8577 patients with uncontrolled RH, 5288 (61.7%) had true RH (24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg) and 3289 (38.3%) had “white coat” RH (24-h BP < 130/80 mmHg). Median follow-up was 5 years. Total and cardiovascular mortality were assessed through death certificates. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated through Cox-proportional models, adjusted for age and sex. Table shows the number of patients in each group, number of total and cardiovascular deaths and HR of the 2 comparisons performed. Compared to treated and controlled patients, those with RH had and increased risk of total (19%) and cardiovascular (32%) mortality. Likewise, true RH had an increased risk of total (42%) and cardiovascular (81%) mortality, in comparison with “white-coat” RH. We conclude that RH is associated with and increased total and cardiovascular mortality. In RH patients with elevated office BP, the concomitant elevation of 24-hBP (true RH) is also associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with those with normal 24-h BP (“white-coat” RH).

Finerenone is a potent and selective mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist that slowed progression of CKD and reduced risk of CV outcomes vs. placebo in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase 3 trials. MR overactivation is involved in DR pathogenesis. To evaluate potential benefits of oral finerenone on progression of DR, two studies of identical observational design (ReFineDR and DeFineDR) retrospectively collected data from patients with DR in FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD at selected centers. Eligible patients had a routine ophthalmological examination showing NPDR in ≥1 eye performed 6 months prior to 1 month post-randomization in FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD, and ≥1 subsequent ophthalmological assessment. Patients with advanced DR were excluded; inclusion was blinded to FIDELIO-DKD/FIGARO-DKD treatment assignment. Primary endpoint was occurrence of vision-threatening events (ASN, DME or PDR) at 2 years. Overall, 134 patients received finerenone and 1received placebo, of whom 68.7% and 71.8% had mild/moderate NPDR, 3.0% and 10.0% had severe NPDR, 27.6% and 15.5% had NPDR of unknown severity and 70.1% and 64.5% had HbA1c >7.5%, at baseline (mean HbA1c 8.25 [SD 1.41] and 8.18 [SD 1.34]) . At 2 years, 5 (3.7%) and 7 (6.4%) patients in the finerenone and placebo groups had a vision-threatening event in ≥1 eye (difference -0.026, 95% CI -0.082 to 0.029, p=0.3550) . The number of events increased after 2 years, with trends in Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence probabilities in favor of finerenone at 30 and 36 months (post hoc) . Results were generally consistent across components of the primary endpoint and subgroups with baseline HbA1c ≤ and >7.5%, UACR 30- Disclosure P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. D.Finis: Employee; Bayer AG. S.Leal: Employee; Bayer Consumer Care AG. T.Schmelter: Employee; Bayer AG, Stock/Shareholder; Bayer AG. G.Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. S.Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. J.G.Garweg: Advisory Panel; AbbVie Inc., Research Support; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Speaker's Bureau; Bayer AG, Novartis AG. T.Osonoi: Research Support; Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kowa Company, Ltd., Novo Nordisk, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk. B.Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. S.Rosas: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Teladoc Health, Other Relationship; Bayer AG, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG. L.M.Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. D.Zhu: n/a. M.Brinker: Employee; Bayer AG.

Introduction: Finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes, without affecting HbA1c, in CKD and T2D patients in the FIDELITY prespecified pooled analysis of the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD studies. Here, we evaluate the effect of finerenone by baseline HbA1c, HbA1c variability, and diabetes duration. Methods: Patients with T2D and CKD (UACR ≥30-≤5000 mg/g and eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Effects of finerenone vs. placebo on CV (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline from baseline, or renal death) composite outcomes were analyzed by baseline HbA1c quartiles, HbA1c variability (first year of treatment) , and diabetes duration quartiles. Results: In 13,026 patients included in the analysis, mean baseline HbA1c was 7.7% and diabetes duration was 15.4 years. Higher baseline HbA1c quartiles had longer diabetes duration and more diabetes-related complications. Risk reductions in the CV and kidney composite outcomes with finerenone vs. placebo were consistent across HbA1c (p-interaction 0.52 and 0.09, respectively) and diabetes duration (p-interaction 0.12 and 0.75) quartiles. HbA1c variability in the first year of treatment was associated with higher cardiorenal risks; each 1 unit increase in mean absolute residual of HbA1c was associated with a 20% increased risk of a CV event (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.35; p=0.0016) and a 36% increased risk of a kidney event (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.21-1.52; p Conclusion: Greater variability in HbA1c was associated with increased risks of cardiorenal outcomes. Risk reductions in the CV and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with CKD and T2D were not modified by baseline HbA1c, HbA1c variability, or duration of diabetes. Disclosure J. B. Mcgill: Advisory Panel; Gilead Sciences, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Provention Bio, Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. M. Brinker: Employee; Bayer AG. A. Joseph: Employee; Bayer AG. A. Z. Lage: None. R. Lawatscheck: None. C. Scott: Employee; Bayer AG. P. Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker’s Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. R. Agarwal: Advisory Panel; Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Bayer AG, Board Member; Chinook Therapeutics Inc., DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. S. Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. G. Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. G. Filippatos: Other Relationship; Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Medtronic, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. B. Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. L. M. Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. A. L. Birkenfeld: None. L. Caramori: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Bayer AG, Novartis AG.

Introduction: Finerenone reduced risk of cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD studies. In FIDELIO-DKD the effects of finerenone on kidney and CV outcomes were consistent irrespective of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use, but analyses were better powered to evaluate change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) . Here, we extend these analyses to patients in both studies (FIDELITY analysis) , thus encompassing a larger population with broader inclusion criteria. Methods: Patients with T2D and CKD (UACR ≥30- Results: Of 13026 patients, 944 (7.2%) received GLP-1RAs at baseline. Results were consistent irrespective of GLP-1RA use at baseline for the CV composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-1.with GLP-1RA; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96 without GLP-1RA; p-interaction 0.63) , and the kidney composite outcome (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.45-1.48 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.89 without GLP-1RA; p-interaction 0.79) . A greater reduction in UACR was observed with finerenone in patients taking GLP-1RA at baseline (placebo-corrected change -38% with GLP-1RA and -31% without GLP-1RA use; p-interaction 0.03) . Incidence of hyperkalemia was similarly increased with finerenone irrespective of GLP-1RA use at baseline. Conclusion: The benefits of finerenone on composite CV and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D are not modified by GLP-1RA use at baseline, with an increased effect observed for UACR reduction, suggesting a different mechanism of reduction in albuminuria. Disclosure P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. P.Viswanathan: Employee; Bayer AG. R.Lawatscheck: None. A.Joseph: Employee; Bayer AG. G.Bakris: Consultant; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, DiaMedica Therapeutics, Inc., Horizon Therapeutics plc, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. S.Anker: Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; Abbott. G.Filippatos: Other Relationship; Amgen Inc., Amgen Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Medtronic, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. B.Pitt: Advisory Panel; Merck & Co., Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. L.M.Ruilope: Consultant; Bayer AG. V.Fonseca: Consultant; Abbott, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Bayer AG, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Fractyl Health, Inc., Jaguar Gene Therapy, Stock/Shareholder; Abbott, Amgen Inc., BRAVO4Health, Mellitus Health. G.E.Umpierrez: Research Support; AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. L.Caramori: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Bayer AG, Novartis AG. M.Lambelet: Other Relationship; Bayer AG.

Background and aim Blood pressure variability (BPV) is recognized as a prognostic contributor in hypertension. We aimed to assess differences in short-term BPV in treated hypertensive patients depending on the number, classes, combinations and individual compounds of the antihypertensive treatment. Methods We selected 38 188 treated patients from the Spanish Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) Registry. SBP and DBP standard deviations (SD) from 24-h, daytime and night-time, weighted SD (WSD), and average real variability (ARV) were calculated through ABPM. They were compared (after adjustment for clinical confounders and BP) depending on the number of antihypertensive drugs, antihypertensive drug classes and compounds (in 13 765 patients on monotherapy), or combinations (in 12 716 patients treated with two drugs and 7888 treated with three drugs). Results Systolic and diastolic BPV significantly increased in patients treated with multiple drugs with respect to monotherapy. Among drug classes, calcium channel blockers, especially amlodipine, and diuretics were associated with lower systolic BPV, including daytime and night-time SD, WSD and ARV, compared with beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Likewise, in patients treated with two-drug and three-drug combinations, those which included a calcium channel blocker showed lower BPV in comparison to those without such drug class. Conclusion Treatment with calcium channel blockers, especially amlodipine, and with diuretics is associated with slight, but significant lower values of short-term BPV in comparison to other major drug classes, both in monotherapy and in combination. These results could be helpful when considering BPV reduction as an additional treatment target.

Background and Purpose Klotho is a membrane‐bound or soluble protein, originally identified as an age‐suppressing factor and regulator of mineral metabolism. Klotho deficiency is associated with the development of renal disease, but its role in cardiac function in the context of uraemic cardiomyopathy is unknown. Experimental Approach We explored the effects of Klotho on cardiac Ca2+ cycling. We analysed Ca2+ handling in adult cardiomyocytes from Klotho‐deficient (kl/kl) mice and from a murine model of 5/6 nephrectomy (Nfx). We also studied the effect of exogenous Klotho supplementation, by chronic recombinant Klotho treatment, or endogenous Klotho overexpression, using transgenic mice overexpressing Klotho (Tg‐Kl), on uraemic cardiomyopathy. Hearts from Nfx mice were used to study Ca2+ sensitivity of ryanodine receptors and their phosphorylation state. Key Results Cardiomyocytes from kl/kl mice showed decreased amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ transients and cellular shortening together with an increase in pro‐arrhythmic Ca2+ events compared with cells from wild‐type mice. Cardiomyocytes from Nfx mice exhibited the same impairment in Ca2+ cycling as kl/kl mice. Changes in Nfx cardiomyocytes were explained by higher sensitivity of ryanodine receptors to Ca2+ and their increased phosphorylation at the calmodulin kinase type II and protein kinase A sites. Ca2+ mishandling in Nfx‐treated mice was fully prevented by chronic recombinant Klotho administration or transgenic Klotho overexpression. Conclusions and Implications Klotho emerges as an attractive therapeutic tool to improve cardiac Ca2+ mishandling observed in uraemic cardiomyopathy. Strategies that improve Klotho availability are good candidates to protect the heart from functional cardiac alterations in renal disease. Sin financiación 8.740 JCR (2020) Q1, 12/276 Pharmacology & Pharmacy 2.432 SJR (2020) Q1, 16/314 Pharmacology No data IDR 2020 UEM

AimsThe aim of this study was to determine whether arterial stiffness assessed with the biochemical parameter active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and the clinical parameters pulse pressure (PP) and pulse wave velocity predicts the response to spironolactone in resistant hypertension (RH).Methods and resultsAmbulatory blood pressure (BP) and active MMP-9 (measured by zymography and ELISA) were measured at baseline, and patients were classified as having pseudo-RH or RH. Patients with RH received spironolactone and the response was determined after 8 weeks by ambulatory BP monitoring: those who achieved BP goals were considered controlled (CRH) and those who did not were considered uncontrolled (UCRH). Plasma active MMP-9 was significantly higher in patients with RH than with pseudo-RH, and correlated with 24 h systolic BP and PP. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that active MMP-9 could predict the response to spironolactone, and its combination with 24 h PP and pulse wave velocity significantly improved this prediction. Moreover, plasma of patients with UCRH induced the MMP-9 expression pathway.ConclusionWe propose active MMP-9 as a useful biomarker to identify patients with RH who will not respond to spironolactone. Combining MMP-9 activity with classical arterial stiffness parameters improves the prediction of the clinical response to spironolactone and might contribute to guide the most appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with RH.

Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) can be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive blood pressure (BP) lowering by antihypertensive treatment. The identification of hypotension is thus especially important. This study estimated the prevalence of hypotension among CHD-treated hypertensive patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in routine clinical practice. We performed a cross-sectional study with 2892 CHD-treated hypertensive patients from the Spanish ABPM Registry. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP

OBJECTIVE Finerenone reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase 3 studies. Effects of finerenone on outcomes in patients taking sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) were evaluated in a prespecified pooled analysis of these studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 to ≤5,000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo; SGLT2is were permitted at any time. Outcomes included cardiovascular composite (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) and kidney composite (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% eGFR decline, or renal death) end points, changes in UACR and eGFR, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Among 13,026 patients, 877 (6.7%) received an SGLT2i at baseline and 1,113 (8.5%) initiated one during the trial. For the cardiovascular composite, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) without SGLT2i and 0.67 (95% CI 0.42–1.07) with SGLT2i. For the kidney composite, the HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.92) without SGLT2i and 0.42 (95% CI 0.16–1.08) with SGLT2i. Baseline SGLT2i use did not affect risk reduction for the cardiovascular or kidney composites with finerenone (Pinteraction = 0.46 and 0.29, respectively); neither did SGLT2i use concomitant with study treatment. CONCLUSIONS Benefits of finerenone compared with placebo on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were observed irrespective of SGLT2i use.

Aims Finerenone significantly reduced the risk of kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD trial (NCT02540993). This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on the treatment effect of finerenone. Materials and Methods Patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 30-5000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate 25

Despite the standard of care, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) progress to dialysis, are hospitalized for heart failure and die prematurely. Overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) causes inflammation and fibrosis that damages the kidney and heart. Finerenone, a nonsteroidal, selective MR antagonist, confers kidney and heart protection in both animal models and Phase II clinical studies; the effects on serum potassium and kidney function are minimal. Comprising the largest CKD outcomes program to date, FIDELIO-DKD (FInerenone in reducing kiDnEy faiLure and dIsease prOgression in Diabetic Kidney Disease) and FIGARO-DKD (FInerenone in reducinG cArdiovascular moRtality and mOrbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease) are Phase III trials investigating the efficacy and safety of finerenone on kidney failure and cardiovascular outcomes from early to advanced CKD in T2D. By including echocardiograms and biomarkers, they extend our understanding of pathophysiology; by including quality of life measurements, they provide patient-centered outcomes; and by including understudied yet high-risk cardiorenal subpopulations, they have the potential to widen the scope of therapy in T2D with CKD. Trial registration number: FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) and FIGARO-DKD (NCT02545049). Sin financiación 4.531 JCR (2019) Q1, 6/24 Transplantation 1.857 SJR (2019) Q1, 170/2754 Medicine (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2019 UEM

Background The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone and the sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) canagliflozin reduce cardiorenal risk in albuminuric patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). At first glance, the results of Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02540993) and Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) appear disparate. In FIDELIO-DKD, the primary endpoint had an 18% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7–27] relative risk reduction; in CREDENCE, the primary endpoint had a 30% (95% CI 18–41) relative risk reduction. Unlike CREDENCE, the FIDELIO-DKD trial included patients with high albuminuria but excluded patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The primary endpoint in the FIDELIO-DKD trial was kidney specific and included a sustained decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥40% from baseline. In contrast, the primary endpoint in the CREDENCE trial included a sustained decline in eGFR of ≥57% from baseline and cardiovascular (CV) death. This post hoc exploratory analysis investigated how differences in trial design—inclusion/exclusion criteria and definition of primary outcomes—influenced observed treatment effects. Methods Patients from FIDELIO-DKD who met the CKD inclusion criteria of the CREDENCE study (urine albumin: creatinine ratio >300–5000 mg/g and an eGFR of 30– Results Of 4619/5674 (81.4%) patients who met the subgroup inclusion criteria, 49.6% were treated with finerenone and 50.4% received placebo. The rate of the cardiorenal composite endpoint was 43.9/1000 patient-years with finerenone compared with 59.5/1000 patient-years with placebo. The relative risk was significantly reduced by 26% with finerenone versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 (95% CI 0.63–0.87)]. In CREDENCE, the rate of the cardiorenal composite endpoint was 43.2/1000 patient-years with canagliflozin compared with 61.2/1000 patient-years with placebo; a 30% risk reduction was observed with canagliflozin [HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.59–0.82)]. Conclusions This analysis highlights the pitfalls of direct comparisons between trials. When key differences in trial design are considered, FIDELIO-DKD and CREDENCE demonstrate cardiorenal benefits of a similar magnitude.

Background: Chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes are independently associated with heart failure (HF), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. In the FIDELIO-DKD (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease) and FIGARO-DKD (Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease) trials, finerenone (a selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with albuminuric chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. These prespecified analyses from FIGARO-DKD assessed the effect of finerenone on clinically important HF outcomes. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 to 2 , or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥300 to ≤5000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL per min per 1.73 m 2 ), without symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction, were randomized to finerenone or placebo. Time-to-first-event outcomes included new-onset HF (first hospitalization for HF [HHF] in patients without a history of HF at baseline); cardiovascular death or first HHF; HF-related death or first HHF; first HHF; cardiovascular death or total (first or recurrent) HHF; HF-related death or total HHF; and total HHF. Outcomes were evaluated in the overall population and in prespecified subgroups categorized by baseline HF history (as reported by the investigators). Results: Overall, 7352 patients were included in these analyses; 571 (7.8%) had a history of HF at baseline. New-onset HF was significantly reduced with finerenone versus placebo (1.9% versus 2.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50–0.93]; P =0.0162). In the overall population, the incidences of all HF outcomes analyzed were significantly lower with finerenone than placebo, including an 18% lower risk of cardiovascular death or first HHF (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.70–0.95]; P =0.011), a 29% lower risk of first HHF (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56–0.90]; P =0.0043) and a 30% lower rate of total HHF (rate ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.52–0.94]). The effects of finerenone on improving HF outcomes were not modified by a history of HF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was balanced between treatment groups. Conclusions: The results from these FIGARO-DKD analyses demonstrate that finerenone reduces new-onset HF and improves other HF outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, irrespective of a history of HF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02545049.

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a complex disorder that refers to the category of acute or chronic kidney diseases that induce cardiovascular disease, and inversely, acute or chronic heart diseases that provoke kidney dysfunction. There is a close relationship between renal and cardiovascular disease, possibly due to the presence of common risk factors for both diseases. Thus, it is well known that renal diseases are associated with increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease, suffering cardiac events and even mortality, which is aggravated in those patients with end-stage renal disease or who are undergoing dialysis. Recent works have proposed mineral bone disorders (MBD) as the possible link between kidney dysfunction and the development of cardiovascular outcomes. Traditionally, increased serum phosphate levels have been proposed as one of the main factors responsible for cardiovascular damage in kidney patients. However, recent studies have focused on other MBD components such as the elevation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23, a phosphaturic bone-derived hormone, and the decreased expression of the anti-aging factor Klotho in renal patients. It has been shown that increased FGF-23 levels induce cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction and are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in renal patients. Decreased Klotho expression occurs as renal function declines. Despite its expression being absent in myocardial tissue, several studies have demonstrated that this antiaging factor plays a cardioprotective role, especially under elevated FGF-23 levels. The present review aims to collect the recent knowledge about the FGF-23-Klotho axis in the connection between kidney and heart, focusing on their specific role as new therapeutic targets in CRS. Sin financiación 4.566 JCR (2020) Q1, 14/81 Physiology 1.320 SJR (2020) Q2, 45/178 Physiology No data IDR 2020 UEM

OBJECTIVE A continuous association between albuminuria and cardiorenal risk exists further below moderately increased albuminuria ranges. If only based in albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) higher than 30 mg/g, a significant percentage of individuals may be out of the scope for therapeutic management. Despite epidemiological outcomes, the identification of biochemical changes linked to early albuminuria is underexplored, and normoalbuminuric individuals are usually considered at no risk in clinical practice. Here, we aimed to identify early molecular alterations behind albuminuria development. METHODS Hypertensive patients under renin-angiotensin system (RAS) suppression were classified as control, (ACR

Arterial hypertension is particularly prevalent in the elderly and treatment is required according to the literature. Treatment in subjects between 65 and 80 years of age resembles by characteristics and results that obtained in younger population. The treatment of arterial hypertension in the very elderly differs in a relevant percentage of them. It is quite similar in those with a good physical fitness with or without cardiovascular disease. A series of factors as the presence of real sustained hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, frailty and disability, and the boundary of safety recommended by international recent guidelines analysed here are relevant to characterize a clearly elevated risk of complications in the remaining very elderly patients. Sin financiación 3.012 JCR (2020) Q3, 33/65 Peripheral Vascular Disease 0.737 SJR (2020) Q2, 55/131 Internal Medicine No data IDR 2020 UEM

Sin financiación 29.690 JCR (2020) Q1, 3/142 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems 7.795 SJR (2020) Q1, 2/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2019 UEM

Background: Reductions in albuminuria of more than 30% are considered a strong marker of delay of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Single renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockade represents the cornerstone of CKD treatment. However, as CKD progression still occurs, other nephroprotective options were explored; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were tested with generally positive results. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of MRAs on albuminuria/proteinuria, and adverse events, such as change in renal function and hyperkalemia incidence. A detailed search in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which administration of an MRA alone or on-top of ACEi/ARB was compared with placebo or active treatment. Results: Of the 45 initially identified reports, 31, with 2767 participants, were included in analysis of the primary outcome. The use of MRAs (alone or on top of RAS blockade) compared with placebo decreased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) by −24.55% (95% CI −29.57 to −19.53%), urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) by −53.93% (95% CI −79% to −28.86%) and 24 h albumin excretion by −32.47% (95% CI −41.1 to −23.85%). MRAs also reduced UACR by −22.48% (95% CI −24.51 to −20.44%) compared with calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs), whereas no differences were found compared with a second ACEi/ARB or nonpotassium-sparing diuretics. Addition of an MRA was associated with change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of −2.38 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (95% CI −3.51 to −1.25), rise in potassium by 0.22 mEq/l (95% CI 0.16–0.28 mEq/l) and a 2.6-fold increase in hyperkalemia risk (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.69–4.08) compared with placebo/active control. Conclusion: Use of MRAs alone or on top of RAS blockade confers important antiproteinuric effects in patients with CKD, with a slight increase in mean potassium levels. Sin financiación 4.171 JCR (2019) Q1, 13/65 Peripheral Vascular Disease 1.365 SJR (2019) Q1, 42/186 Physiology, 65/362 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 21/139 Internal Medicine No data IDR 2019 UEM

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a concept that currently goes beyond the classical definition of blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg in subjects receiving three or more drugs of different classes at maximally tolerated doses. Here, we review the clinical relevance of RH and the different types of RH-associated phenotypes, namely refractory hypertension, controlled resistant hypertension, and masked uncontrolled hypertension. We also discuss current drug strategies and future treatments for these high-risk phenotypes. Sin financiación 6.617 JCR (2020) Q1, 22/142 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems 1.895 SJR (2020) Q1, 39/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2020 UEM

Aim: The aim of the case-control study was to investigate if serum biomarkers indicative of vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction can predict the development of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Methods: Among participants enrolled in the ROADMAP (Randomized Olmesartan And Diabetes MicroAlbuminuria Prevention) and observational follow-up (OFU) studies, a panel of 15 serum biomarkers was quantified from samples obtained at initiation of the study and tested for associations with the development of new-onset microalbuminuria during follow-up. A case-control study was conducted with inclusion of 172 patients with microalbuminuria and 188 matched controls. Nonparametric inferential, nonlinear regression, mediation, and bootstrapping statistical methods were used for the analysis. Results: The median follow-up time was 37 months. At baseline, mean concentrations of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL-16), transforming growth factor (TGF)–β1 and angiopoietin-2 were higher in patients with subsequent microalbuminuria. In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, duration of diabetes, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), smoking status, blood pressure, baseline urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), time of follow-up and cardiovascular disease, CXCL-16 (odds ratio [OR] 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–3.96), angiopoietin-2 (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.14–1.98) and TGF-β1 (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04) remained significant predictors of new-onset microalbuminuria (P < 0.001). Inclusion of these biomarkers in conventional clinical risk models for prediction of microalbuminuria increased the area under the curve (AUC) from 0.638 to 0.760 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes, elevated plasma levels of CXCL-16, angiopoietin-2, and TGF-β1 are independently predictive of microalbuminuria. Thus, these serum markers improve renal risk models beyond established clinical risk factors. Keywords: albuminuria, atheromatosis, cardiovascular disease, diabetic kidney disease, inflammation

Objective: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are among the recommended first-line treatment options in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ARB on blood pressure (BP) and renal function in patients with concomitant hypertension and CKD with or without diabetes. Methods: Literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIOSIS to identify parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (≥8 weeks) reporting the effects of ARB on office systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (SCr), creatinine clearance (CrCl) or proteinuria in adults with hypertension and CKD. Mean difference (MD, generic inverse variance) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to report an outcome. Results: Among the 24 studies identified, 19 evaluated ARB as monotherapy, 4 evaluated ARB as combination therapy and one evaluated ARB both as monotherapy and combination therapy. Median (range) duration of the studies was 12 (1.84–54.0) months. ARB monotherapy significantly (p Conclusion: ARB had a favorable impact on BP and renal parameters such as proteinuria with monotherapy as well as with combination therapy, highlighting their potential benefits in patients with hypertension and CKD. During the short follow-up of these studies, no significant change in eGFR was observed.

United States and European guidelines have recommended new treatment goals for office blood pressure (BP). We examined 9784 hypertensives of the Spanish Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) registry with office BP treated to the prior goal (

Resistant hypertension prevalence is progressively increasing, and prolonged exposure to suboptimal blood pressure control results in higher cardiovascular risk and end-organ damage. Among various antihypertensive agents, spironolactone seems the most effective choice to treat resistant hypertension once triple therapy including a diuretic fails. However success in blood pressure control is not guaranteed, adverse effects are not negligible, and no clinical tools are available to predict patient's response. Complementary to our previous study of resistant hypertension metabolism, here we investigated urinary proteome changes with potential capacity to predict response to spironolactone. Twenty-nine resistant hypertensives were included. A prospective study was conducted and basal urine was collected before spironolactone administration. Patients were classified in responders or nonresponders in terms of blood pressure control. Protein quantitation was performed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; ELISA and target mass spectrometry analysis were performed for confirmation. Among 3310 identified proteins, HP (haptoglobin) and HPR (haptoglobin-related protein) showed the most significant variations, with increased levels in nonresponders compared with responders before drug administration (variation rate, 5.98 and 7.83, respectively). Protein-coordinated responses were also evaluated by functional enrichment analysis, finding oxidative stress, chronic inflammatory response, blood coagulation, complement activation, and regulation of focal adhesions as physiopathological mechanisms in resistant hypertension. In conclusion, protein changes able to predict patients' response to spironolactone in basal urine were here identified for the first time. These data, once further confirmed, will support clinical decisions on patients' management while contributing to optimize the rate of control of resistant hypertensives with spironolactone. This work was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III co-supported by FEDER grants (PI14/01650, PI14/01917, PI14/01841, PI16/01334, IF08/3667-1, FI12/00126, CPII15/00027, CP15/00129, CP16/00116, PT13/0001/0013, PRB3 (IPT17/0019 ISCIIIS-GEFI/ERDF), REDinREN (RD12/0021/0001 and RD16/0009)) Fundación SENEFRO and Fundación Conchita Rábago de Jiménez Díaz. These results are lined up with the Spanish initiative on the Human Proteome Project. Sí

Moderately increased albuminuria, defined by an albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) &gt, 30 mg/g, is an indicator of subclinical organ damage associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. Normoalbuminuric subjects are considered at no cardiorenal risk in clinical practice, and molecular changes underlying early development are unclear. To decipher subjacent mechanisms, we stratified the normoalbuminuria condition. A total of 37 hypertensive patients under chronic renin–angiotensin system (RAS) suppression with ACR values in the normoalbuminuria range were included and classified as control (C) (ACR &lt, 10 mg/g) and high-normal (HN) (ACR = 10–30 mg/g). Target metabolomic analysis was carried out by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to investigate the role of the cardiorenal risk urinary metabolites previously identified. Besides this, urinary free fatty acids (FFAs), fatty acid binding protein 1 (FABP1) and nephrin were analyzed by colorimetric and ELISA assays. A Mann–Whitney test was applied, ROC curves were calculated and Spearman correlation analysis was carried out. Nine metabolites showed significantly altered abundance in HN versus C, and urinary FFAs and FABP1 increased in HN group, pointing to dysregulation in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle and fatty acids β-oxidation. We showed here how cardiorenal metabolites associate with albuminuria, already in the normoalbuminuric range, evidencing early renal damage at a tubular level and suggesting increased β-oxidation to potentially counteract fatty acids overload in the HN range.

Introduction: Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that significantly reduced the risk of kidney and CV outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD trial, with no effect on blood glucose. In advanced T2D, insulin is often used to control glycemia. This analysis will report outcomes from the FIDELIO-DKD trial by baseline insulin treatment. Methods: In FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993), 5734 patients with T2D, UACR 30-5000 mg/g, eGFR 25- Results: Of the 5674 patients analyzed, 3637 (64.1%) were treated with insulin or insulin analogues at baseline. Patients treated with insulin at baseline had a higher A1C and a longer duration of diabetes, with higher proportions of statin and GLP-1RA use, and lower use of other anti-hyperglycemic agents than those who were not. Finerenone did not affect A1C during the trial. The primary and key secondary CV outcome occurred in fewer patients treated with finerenone, with no between-group interaction (primary outcome: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98 with insulin; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.96 without insulin; P-value for interaction 0.56; CV outcome: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97 with insulin; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.74-1.23 without insulin; P-value for interaction 0.33). Hyperkalemia events were similar between groups (mean treatment difference between finerenone and placebo for treatment-emergent serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L, 11.1% with insulin and 13.4% without insulin), with a low incidence of hyperkalemia-related treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Finerenone has a beneficial effect on kidney and CV outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D, irrespective of insulin use at baseline. Disclosure P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. L. Roessig: Employee; Self; Bayer AG. C. Scott: Employee; Self; Bayer PLC. G. Bakris: Consultant; Self; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Vascular Dynamics Inc. R. Agarwal: Advisory Panel; Self; Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Diamedica, Relypsa Inc., Sanofi US, Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Chinook. S. Anker: Consultant; Self; Abbott, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Cardiac Dimensions Pty. Ltd., Impulse Dynamics, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Other Relationship; Self; Abbott, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. G. Filippatos: Other Relationship; Self; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Servier Laboratories. B. Pitt: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. L. M. Ruilope: None. R. Macisaac: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novo Nordisk, Servier Laboratories, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk. J. Wainstein: Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Self; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Kowa Company, Ltd., Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk. A. Joseph: Employee; Self; Bayer AG. Funding Bayer AG

Introduction: Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that significantly reduced the risk of kidney and CV outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in the FIDELIO-DKD trial. GLP-1RAs have also been shown to improve CV outcomes in patients with T2D as well as lowering albuminuria. The mechanism of action of finerenone and GLP-1RAs are largely independent but their combined effects are unknown. This analysis will report outcomes from the FIDELIO-DKD trial in patients by GLP-1RA treatment. Methods: FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) randomized 5734 patients to oral finerenone or placebo. Patients with T2D, UACR 30-5000mg/g and eGFR 25- Results: Of the 5674 patients analyzed, 394 (6.9%) were treated with a GLP-1RA at baseline. Patients treated with GLP-1RAs at baseline had a higher BMI and A1C, with higher diuretic and statin use, lower median UACR and less presence of CVD than those who were not. There was no between-group interaction for the primary kidney (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71-1.90 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.91 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction 0.15) or secondary CV outcomes (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60-1.74 with GLP-1RA; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction 0.51). The reduction in UACR was independent of GLP-1RA use (ratio of LS-means 0.63, 95% CI 0.56-0.70 with GLP-1RA; 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.72 without GLP-1RA; P-interaction 0.20). Overall, incidences of hyperkalemia events were similar in patients with and without GLP-1RA use. Conclusion: The effects of finerenone on kidney and CV outcomes appear consistent irrespective of GLP-1RA use, with a potential additive benefit for UACR reduction. Disclosure P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. A. Z. Lage: Employee; Self; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. C. Scott: Employee; Self; Bayer PLC. G. Bakris: Consultant; Self; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Vascular Dynamics Inc. R. Agarwal: Advisory Panel; Self; Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Diamedica, Relypsa Inc., Sanofi US, Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Chinook. S. Anker: Consultant; Self; Abbott, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Cardiac Dimensions Pty. Ltd., Impulse Dynamics, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Other Relationship; Self; Abbott, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. G. Filippatos: Other Relationship; Self; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Servier Laboratories. B. Pitt: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. L. M. Ruilope: None. A. Amod: Advisory Panel; Self; Aspen South Africa, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Servier Laboratories, Consultant; Self; Servier Laboratories, Other Relationship; Self; Bayer AG, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier Laboratories. M. Marre: Board Member; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk. A. Joseph: Employee; Self; Bayer AG. Funding Bayer AG

Introduction: Patients with CKD and T2D are at high risk of morbidity and mortality despite the use of guideline-directed therapies. Finerenone, a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, reduced the risk of adverse kidney and CV outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D; here we report outcomes by baseline A1C. Methods: FIDELIO-DKD (NCT02540993) randomized 5734 patients from 48 countries to receive oral finerenone or placebo. Eligible patients had T2D, with a UACR of ≥30-≤5000 mg/g, eGFR ≥25‍-‍12% at screening were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR from baseline, or renal death. The key secondary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for HF. Results: In the 5674 patients analyzed, the mean baseline A1C was 7.7% and mean diabetes duration was 16.6 years; finerenone did not affect A1C during the trial. Overall, 2948 patients had A1C ≤7.5% and 2715 patients had A1C >7.5% at baseline. Patients with higher A1C levels were more likely to use insulin and had a longer duration of diabetes. After a median follow-up of 2.6 years, the primary outcome occurred in fewer patients treated with finerenone compared with placebo, this was observed in both the A1C ≤7.5% and >7.5% groups (18.7% vs. 21.5% patients with A1C of ≤7.5% [HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73-1.01]; 16.9% vs. 20.7% patients with A1C >7.5% [HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94]; P-interaction 0.47). Finerenone also reduced the incidence of the key secondary CV outcome compared with placebo regardless of baseline A1C (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.07 for A1C ≤7.5% and HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69-1.01 for A1C >7.5%; P-interaction 0.73). Reduction in UACR was consistent across subgroups. Overall, hyperkalemia events were independent of A1C level. Conclusion: In patients with CKD and T2D, treatment with finerenone reduced the risk for developing adverse kidney and CV outcomes independent of baseline A1C. Disclosure P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. M. Brinker: Employee; Self; Bayer AG, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Bayer AG. C. Scott: Employee; Self; Bayer PLC. G. Bakris: Consultant; Self; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Vascular Dynamics Inc. E. Burgess: Advisory Panel; Self; Bayer Inc. R. Agarwal: Advisory Panel; Self; Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Diamedica, Relypsa Inc., Sanofi US, Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Chinook. S. Anker: Consultant; Self; Abbott, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Cardiac Dimensions Pty. Ltd., Impulse Dynamics, Novartis AG, Servier Laboratories, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Other Relationship; Self; Abbott, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. G. Filippatos: Other Relationship; Self; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Servier Laboratories. B. Pitt: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. L. M. Ruilope: None. P. Gillard: None. A. Joseph: Employee; Self; Bayer AG. Funding Bayer AG

Background and Aims Finerenone is a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) that significantly reduced the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the FIDELIO-DKD trial. In phase II studies, finerenone had modest effects on office blood pressure (BP) compared with the steroidal MRA spironolactone. We report an analysis of the relationship between baseline and changes in office systolic BP (SBP) and outcomes with finerenone in the FIDELIO-DKD trial. Method In FIDELIO-DKD, 5734 patients were randomised 1:1 to oral finerenone or placebo. Patients with T2D, urine albumin-to-creatine ratio (UACR) ≥30– Results A total of 5669 patients with available baseline SBP data were analysed. At baseline, the mean SBP and diastolic BP were 138.0 and 75.8 mmHg, respectively. Patients treated for hypertension at baseline received an average of 3.3 antihypertensive therapies. The study population was stratified by quartiles (Q) of SBP at baseline: ≤128.7 mmHg (Q1); >128.7–≤138.3 mmHg (Q2); >138.3–≤148.0 mmHg (Q3); and >148.0 mmHg (Q4). Patients in higher SBP categories tended to be older, with higher median UACR, but similar mean eGFR at baseline. Effects of finerenone, estimated as hazard ratios (HRs), were consistent across the quartiles for the primary endpoint (HR [95% CI]: Q1, 0.87 [0.66–1.15]; Q2, 0.76 [0.59–0.98]; Q3, 0.81 [0.65–1.02]; Q4, 0.86 [0.70–1.07]; p-value for interaction=0.87) and the key secondary endpoint (HR [95% CI]: Q1, 0.95 [0.69–1.29]; Q2, 0.81 [0.60–1.10]; Q3, 0.79 [0.60–1.03]; Q4, 0.91 [0.70–1.18]; p-value for interaction=0.78) (Figure). Finerenone treatment resulted in a modest reduction in SBP; over the duration of the trial, overall mean difference in SBP between treatment groups was –2.7 mmHg. Maximum differences in SBP between finerenone and placebo were observed at month 4; the mean change in SBP from baseline to month 4 across SBP quartiles were: Q1: 4.99 and 9.01 mmHg; Q2: –0.85 and 2.43 mmHg; Q3: –5.63 and –2.40 mmHg; Q4: –11.76 and –6.44 mmHg, for finerenone and placebo, respectively. Adjusting for baseline SBP and SBP change to month 4 resulted in small changes in treatment effect for the primary endpoint and the key secondary endpoint, with only slightly increased HRs for treatment compared with the unadjusted primary analysis (primary endpoint: HR: 0.85 vs 0.82; key secondary endpoint: HR: 0.90 vs 0.86) and no strong indication of an interaction between treatment and SBP. Conclusion In FIDELIO-DKD, a small proportion of the effect of finerenone on cardiorenal outcomes can be attributed to BP. However, most of the effect appears to be via BP-independent mechanisms. (Funded by Bayer AG; FIDELIO-DKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02540993)

Background Activity of the sympathetic nervous system is increased in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here we compare short- and long-term blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of renal denervation (RDN) between hypertensive patients with or without CKD in the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Methods Office and 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) were assessed at prespecified time points after RDN. The presence of CKD was defined according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and enrolled patients were stratified based on the presence (n = 475, eGFR Results Patients with CKD were older (P Conclusions After adjusting for baseline data, 24-h systolic and diastolic ABP reduction were similar in patients with and without CKD after RDN, whereas office systolic but not diastolic BP was reduced less in patients with CKD. We conclude that RDN is an effective antihypertensive treatment option in CKD patients.

Chronic exercise reduces clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP), but the short-term effects of an acute exercise bout on ambulatory BP have not been studied widely. We reviewed the literature regarding the short-term effects of acute exercise on ambulatory BP in patients with hypertension and considered moderating factors (medication status and exercise modality/intensity) on ambulatory BP outcomes. A systematic search was conducted (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus; since inception to January 1, 2021) for crossover randomized controlled trials assessing the short-term effects of acute exercise on ambulatory BP in hypertensive individuals versus nonexercise control conditions. A meta-analysis was conducted for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. Subanalyses also were performed attending to medication status and exercise modality/intensity. Thirty-seven studies (N=822) met the inclusion criteria. A single acute exercise bout reduces 24-hour (systolic BP, −1.6 mm Hg [95% CI, −2.4 to −0.8] for all exercise modalities combined; diastolic BP, −1.0 mm Hg [95% CI, −1.5 to −0.5]), daytime (−3.1 mm Hg [95% CI, −4.1 to −2.2]; -2.0 mm Hg [95% CI, −2.8 to −1.2]), and nighttime ambulatory BP (−1.8 mm Hg [95% CI, −3.0 to −0.6]; −1.5 mm Hg [95% CI, −2.3 to −0.6]), respectively. The magnitude of the effect appears similar in medicated and nonmedicated patients. In separate analyses for exercise modalities, aerobic exercises reduce all ambulatory BP measures (P

Este artículo se encuentra disponible en la siguiente URL: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartjsupp/article/23/Supplement_B/B138/6279165 En este artículo también participan: Inés Mera-Gallego, Salvador Tous, Nicanor F. de Andrés, Teresa Gijón, David Pérez-Manchon, Neil R. Poulter, Gema Ruiz-Hurtado y Luis Miguel Ruilope. The aim of the May Measurement Month (MMM) is devoted to better understanding the awareness, treatment, and control rates of hypertension in Spain. Presented here are the data corresponding to 2019 campaign. In 2019, a total of 4433 patients (61.5% males) with a mean age of 54.8 years were included. Of all, 96.0% were Caucasian, and 3294 were recruited in pharmacies. The mean values of systolic blood pressure (BP) were 125.6 and of diastolic 76.7mmHg in the whole population. The most recent previous BP measurement took place more than 1 year before in 27.6% of participants. A total of 1883 were hypertensive (systolic BP 140 mmHg or diastolic BP 90mmHg or taking antihypertensive medication), of whom 77.2%/were aware and 71.1% were onmedication. Of all, 64.9% of those on medication and 46.1% of all hypertensive participants had a BP controlled to

descripción no proporcionada por scopus, We sincerely appreciate the collaboration of Quirónprevención, which provided the anonymized data used in this study and provided support on analyses and interpretation. Research on physical activity by ASL is funded by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and Fondos FEDER (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS), grant numbers PI15/00558 and PI18/00139).

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF) due to cardiac remodeling and kidney complications. Finerenone, a novel, selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, inhibited cardiac remodeling in preclinical models. Objectives: This work aims to examine the effect of finerenone on new-onset AFF and cardiorenal effects by history of AFF in the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) study. Methods: Patients with CKD and T2D were randomized (1:1) to finerenone or placebo. Eligible patients had a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 to ≤5,000 mg/g, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 to 2 and received optimized doses of renin–angiotensin system blockade. Effect on new-onset AFF was evaluated as a pre-specified outcome adjudicated by an independent cardiologist committee. The primary composite outcome (time to first onset of kidney failure, a sustained decrease of ≥40% in eGFR from baseline, or death from renal causes) and key secondary outcome (time to first onset of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) were analyzed by history of AFF. Results: Of 5,674 patients, 461 (8.1%) had a history of AFF. New-onset AFF occurred in 82 (3.2%) patients on finerenone and 117 (4.5%) patients on placebo (hazard ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.94; p = 0.016). The effect of finerenone on primary and key secondary kidney and cardiovascular outcomes was not significantly impacted by baseline AFF (interaction p value: 0.16 and 0.85, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with CKD and T2D, finerenone reduced the risk of new-onset AFF. The risk of kidney or cardiovascular events was reduced irrespective of history of AFF at baseline. (EudraCT 2015-000990-11 [A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, event-driven Phase III study to investigate the efficacy and safety of finerenone, in addition to standard of care, on the progression of kidney disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the clinical diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease]; Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Kidney Disease [FIDELIO-DKD]; NCT02540993)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: The FIDELIO-DKD trial (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease) evaluated the effect of the nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes with optimized renin–angiotensin system blockade. Compared with placebo, finerenone reduced the composite kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. We report the effect of finerenone on individual cardiovascular outcomes and in patients with and without history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients with type 2 diabetes and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥25 to

Sin financiación 5.525 JCR (2021) Q2, 18/67 Peripheral Vascular Disease 1.119 SJR (2021) Q1, 70/356 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2021 UEM

Sin financiación No data JCR 2020 0.194 SJR (2020) Q4, 266/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine No data IDR 2019 UEM

The three more important sequalae of sustained hypertension in the heart, include heart failure (HF), conduction to arrhythmia particularly atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD). In this issue of the journal Sava et al. [1] describe analyzing the data from the INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril (INVEST) study [2] the optimal systolic blood pressure (BP) to reduce mortality in women with previous coronary events. In a very recent review by Mehilli and Presbitero [3] the characteristics of women with CAD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are amply described. Women with CAD differ from men by several aspects as the clinical presentation, the accompanying comorbidities and risk factors, as well as, by the delivery of medical care. Moreover, women use to be older and present frequent and pronounced frailty. They present more frequently ACS without obstructive coronary arteries which makes it difficult the diagnosis and treatment of ACS. Importantly, in young women compared to men early death is more frequent in women, as well as, in older women during the first year after an ACS. The two main Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension that of European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) [4] and that of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) [5] differ in the recommended BP goal for patients with chronic CAD depending on their age. The European Guideline defines the systolic goal BP in patients with CAD as inferior to 130/80 mmHg when the age of the patient is

The prognostic relevance of short-term blood pressure (BP) variability in hypertension is not clearly established. We aimed to evaluate the association of short-term BP variability, assessed through ambulatory BP monitoring, with total and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of patients with hypertension. We selected 63 910 subjects from the Spanish ABPM Registry from 2004 to 2014, with a median follow-up of 4.7 years. Systolic and diastolic BP SD from 24 hours, daytime, and nighttime, weighted SD (mean of daytime and nighttime SD weighted for period duration), average real variability (mean of differences between consecutive readings), variation independent of the mean, and BP variability ratio (ratio between systolic and diastolic 24-hour SD) were calculated through 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring performed at baseline. Association with total and cardiovascular mortality (obtained through death certificates) were assessed by Cox regression models adjusted for clinical confounders and BP. Patients who died during follow-up had higher values of BP variability compared with those remaining alive. In fully adjusted models, daytime, nighttime, and weighted SD, systolic and diastolic, as well as diastolic average real variability, were all significantly associated with total and cardiovascular mortality. Hazard ratios for 1 SD increase ranged from 1.05 to 1.09 for total mortality and from 1.07 to 1.12 for cardiovascular mortality. A nighttime systolic SD ≥12 mm Hg was independently associated with total (hazard ratio: 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06–1.21]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09–1.36]). We conclude that short-term BP variability is independently associated with total and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension.

Several models are available to calculate the risk of developing cardiovascular complications in mid-life. The estimation of lifetime risk in the long-term remains an unmet clinical need. We previously identified new molecular plasma signatures for cardiovascular risk stratification in a young population (30–50-years old). The aim of the present study was to determine if the specific signature found in young population changes with age. Proteomic analysis was performed in plasma samples obtained from different age groups, middle-age (50–70-years old, n = 63) and elderly (>70-years old, n = 61), which, in turn were classified into 3 subgroups according to cardiovascular risk. Our previous results in a young population clearly showed two different proteomic signatures. Building on these findings, targeted-mass spectrometry and turbidimetry analyses were used to test these signatures in middle-age and elderly populations. This strategy identified three common proteomic signatures between young and adult patients related to cardiovascular stratification, organ damage and risk prediction. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the potential value of these novel markers for lifetime risk stratification. Our results provide new insight into altered molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and, more importantly, identify novel protein panels that can stratify patients throughout life. Significance Our results revealed three common proteomic signatures between young and adult patients related to cardiovascular stratification, organ damage and risk prediction. The results obtained provide a deeper insight into the pathogenesis of CV diseases and allow the identification of novel protein panels to stratify patients according to CV risk throughout life. While current estimators calculate the risk of having a CV event considering age as the most important factor to CV disease, our results represent an alternative to traditional CV risk factors, allowing the stratification of CV risk regardless of the age. Using a combination of traditional markers and established algorithms with these findings as a future preventive strategy, could facilitate an adequate assessment of CV risk. Sin financiación 4.044 JCR (2020) Q2, 21/78 Biochemical Research Methods 1.067 SJR (2020) Q1, 23/140 Biophysics No data IDR 2020 UEM