Search

To determine the prevalence of obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors (RF) in middle-aged women, to correlate them with each other, and to describe the prevalence of such a RF and their changes with aging, menopause and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) in a cohort of Chilean workers.In 1991-1992 cardiovascular RFs were assessed in 467 women between 40 and 59 who were not taking HRT at that time. Five years later these women were re-evaluated.Sedentarism (87.2%), dyslipidemias (71.5%), high blood pressure (13.5%), obesity (13.1%), smoking (12.4%) and diabetes (2.8%) were the more prevalent RF. These RF become more prevalent with age. In the second control, 5 years later, hypertension (20.9%), obesity (27.3%), smoking (20.8%) and diabetes (5.9%) were observed increased. Dyslipidemia did not changed, although triglyceride levels rose from 125.9+/-56.4 to 136.8+/-63.5 mg/dl (P0.01). Sedentarism dropped to 58.8%. Menopause did not deteriorate any of these RF. The use of HRT increased during the 5-years follow-up from 3.8 to 35%, and related to its use a decrease in LDL-cholesterol and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels were detected.Middle-aged women included in this cohort have a high prevalence of RF; these deteriorate with age, but no with menopause. HRT improves the lipid profile.

To compare the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among Chilean women according to their socioeconomic level.A total of 540 women between 50 and 79 years of age were interviewed in Santiago, Chile. Women were allocated into two groups (H, high; L, low), according to their socioeconomic status.Each group consisted of 270 women. The mean age and percentage of menopausal women were similar in both groups. Of the interviewed women, 47% had taken HRT at some time; marked differences between the two groups were observed (L, 15%; H, 79%;0.0001). In group H, the percentage of women who had been advised about HRT was close to 88%, whereas, in group L, the percentage was only 24%. Among the women who were informed about HRT, 83% ( = 253) had used it at some time. The percentage of women who used HRT for2 years was similar in both groups. The main reason for not taking HRT in group H was fear of adverse effects, whereas the main reason for not taking it in group L was the lack of medical advice.The percentage of women in the low socioeconomic group who use HRT is low. Medical advice is fundamental to increasing HRT use in this group.

To compare donor and recipient outcome after inducing the final oocyte maturation with hCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH-antagonist treated oocyte donation (OD) cycles.Two-hundred fifty-seven oocyte donors were enrolled to participate in a clinical trial in a private fertility centre. After stimulation with 225 IU rFSH and Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day, 212 oocyte donors were randomised with sealed envelopes for triggering with recombinant hCG (Ovitrelle 250 microgr, n = 106) or a GnRH agonist (triptorelin 0.2 mg, n = 106).The number of retrieved COCs (12 +/- 6.3 vs 11.4 +/- 6.4), mature oocytes (8 +/- 4.6 vs 7.5 +/- 4.1), the proportion of mature oocytes (67.2 +/- 20.4% vs 67.1 +/- 20.9%) and fertilisation rates (67.8 +/- 23.5% vs 71.1 +/- 22.1%) were comparable. Clinical, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates were not statistically different in the corresponding recipient groups. Nine cases of mild and one case of severe OHSS occurred in hCG group, whereas no cases were detected in GnRH agonist group.The findings of our RCT suggest that donor and recipient outcome are comparable in OD cycles triggered with hCG or a GnRH agonist. Furthermore, the risk of OHSS seems to be reduced considerably, therefore the combination of a GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering constitutes a safe treatment option for egg-donors.

Raloxifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator, is effective in the treatment of osteoporosis without stimulating the breast and the endometrium. Although it is associated with a decrease of cardiovascular risk markers the effect of these changes on atherogenesis, is not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of raloxifene on aorta atherogenesis. A total of 32 cholesterol-fed New Zealand white rabbits were studied for 4 months. Twenty-four rabbits underwent bilateral ovariectomy; of these eight received raloxifene (group OR), eight received oestradiol valerate (group OE) and eight received placebo after sterilisation (group OP). Finally, another eight were sham-operated (non-ovariectomised) and received placebo with a hypercholesterolaemic diet (group SP). After the diet, total levels of cholesterol increased in group SP from 111.25 +/- 34.8 mg/dl to 1112.25 +/- 364.2, in group OP from 122.62 +/- 27.7 mg/dl to 1367.37 +/- 348.4, in group OE from 65.25 +/- 17.01 to 1710.5 +/- 356.2 and in group OR from 108.88 +/- 15.54 mg/dl to 1407.86 +/- 397.7 (no significant differences). At 4 months, in both treated and untreated rabbits, the cholesterol-rich diet caused atherosclerotic lesions affecting 24.51 +/- 16.1% for group SP, 30.47 +/- 12.2% for group OP, 30.31 +/- 18.07% for group OR and 17.91 +/- 10.19 for group OE (P

Background: Different hormonal replacement regimens are used for treating climacteric complaints; however, not all of them have the same clinical profile. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major health problem and tibolone, raloxifene, estradiol (alone or with cyproterone acetate) have been added to cholesterol-fed rabbits to study atherosclerosis. Methods: A total of 48 cholesterol-fed New Zealand white rabbits were studied for 4 months. Forty rabbits underwent bilateral ovariectomy and the other eight were sham operated (group S). The ovariectomized rabbits were allocated to five groups of eight animals each receiving tibolone (Group T, 6 mg/day), raloxifene (R, 35 mg/day), estradiol valerate (E, 3 mg/day), estradiol valerate plus cyproterone acetate (EC, 3+0.5 mg/day, respectively), and no treatment for the control group (C). The sham group received no treatment too. Results: After 4 months the percentage of the extent of atherosclerosis in the aorta was 30.4% in C group, 24.5% in S group, 10.2% in T group, 30.3% in R group, 17.9% in E group and 28.1% in EC group (P