Search

Aims : Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), likely related to underlying inflammation. We examined VTE risk associated with two commonly used immunomodulators in RA patients, methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine. Methods and Results : Using U.S. Medicare claims data (2008-2017), we identified RA patients (≥65 years) who initiated methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine without prior use of any immunomodulators. The primary outcome was VTE, a composite of pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Secondary outcomes included PE, DVT, and all-cause mortality. After 1:1 propensity score matching for confounding control, we identified 26,534 pairs of methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine initiators (mean (SD) age 74 (7) years; 79% female). During a total of 56,686 person-years of follow-up, 208 methotrexate and 83 hydroxychloroquine initiators developed VTE. The incidence rate of VTE was higher among methotrexate initiators (6.94/1,000 person-years) than hydroxychloroquine initiators (3.11/1,000 person-years) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.26 (95%CI 1.75, 2.91). Methotrexate initiators had a greater risk of PE (HR 3.30, 95%CI 2.28, 4.77) and DVT (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.07, 2.19) than hydroxychloroquine initiators. All-cause mortality was similar between the two groups (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.83, 1.00). Conclusion : In this large real-world cohort of older RA patients, treatment with methotrexate was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of VTE relative to hydroxychloroquine, although all-cause mortality was similar. Future experimental studies with non-user control groups are needed to determine the causal relationships between the study drugs and VTE and whether methotrexate elevates or hydroxychloroquine reduces the risk of VTE.

Objective Guidelines for methotrexate (MTX) use in rheumatic disease may not be feasible for physicians practicing in the least developed countries. We aimed to understand the experiences of MTX prescribers relating to MTX use for rheumatic disease in African countries to inform the development of culturally and geographically appropriate recommendations. Methods African physicians who self‐identified as MTX prescribers from countries classified as having a low versus a medium or high Human Development Index (L‐HDI versus MH‐HDI) participated in semistructured interviews between August 2016 and September 2017. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded thematically, and stratified by HDI. Results Physicians (23 rheumatologists; six internists) from 29 African countries were interviewed (15 L‐HDI; 14 MH‐HDI). Identified barriers to MTX use included inconsistent MTX supply (reported by 87% L‐HDI versus 43% MH‐HDI), compounded by financial restrictions (reported by 93% L‐HDI versus 64% MH‐HDI), patient hesitancy based partly on cultural beliefs and societal roles (reported by 71%), few prescribers (reported by 33%), prevalent infections (especially viral hepatitis, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus), and both availability and cost of monitoring tests. MTX pretreatment evaluation and starting and maximal doses were similar between L‐HDI countries and MH‐HDI countries. Conclusion The challenges of treating rheumatic disease in African countries include unreliable drug availability and cost, limited subspecialists, and patient beliefs. Adapting recommendations for MTX use in the context of prevalent endemic infections; ensuring safe but feasible MTX monitoring strategies, enhanced access to stable drug supply, and specialized rheumatology care; and improving patient education are key to reducing the burden of rheumatic diseases in L‐HDI countries.

Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are 1.5 times more likely to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributed to chronic inflammation. A decrease in inflammation in patients with RA is associated with increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate the changes in lipid levels among RA patients experiencing changes in inflammation and determine the association with concomitant temporal patterns in markers of myocardial injury. Methods A total of 196 patients were evaluated in a longitudinal RA cohort, with blood samples and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels measured annually. Patients were stratified based on whether they experienced either a significant increase in inflammation (an increase in hsCRP of ≥10 mg/liter between any 2 time points 1 year apart; designated the increased inflammation cohort [n = 103]) or decrease in inflammation (a decrease in hsCRP of ≥10 mg/liter between any 2 time points 1 year apart; designated the decreased inflammation cohort [n = 93]). Routine and advanced lipids, markers of inflammation (interleukin-6, hsCRP, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II), and markers of subclinical myocardial injury (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT], N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) were measured. Results Among the patients in the increased inflammation cohort, the mean age was 59 years, 81% were women, and the mean RA disease duration was 17.9 years. The average increase in hsCRP levels was 36 mg/liter, and this increase was associated with significant reductions in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein (Apo B), and Apo A-I levels. In the increased inflammation cohort at baseline, 45.6% of patients (47 of 103) had detectable circulating hs-cTnT, which further increased during inflammation (P = 0.02). In the decreased inflammation cohort, hs-cTnT levels remained stable despite a reduction in inflammation over follow-up. In both cohorts, hs-cTnT levels were associated with the overall estimated risk of CVD. Conclusion Among RA patients who experienced an increase in inflammation, a significant decrease in routinely measured lipids, including LDL cholesterol, and an increase in markers of subclinical myocardial injury were observed. These findings highlight the divergence in biomarkers of CVD risk and suggest a role in future studies examining the benefit of including hs-cTnT for CVD risk stratification in RA.

Objective Phase III clinical trials of the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors SB4, SB2, and SB5 (biosimilars to etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab, respectively) have demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data from these trials were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with radiographic progression and to build a matrix risk model for its prediction. Methods Patients with radiographic progression and baseline demographic and disease characteristic data were pooled across the 3 phase III studies of each biosimilar and its reference product. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were evaluated for their relationship with radiographic progression (1-year mean change in mTSS > 0); 3 factors were selected based on strongest Pearson’s correlation coefficient with the change in modified Total Sharp Score. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between each baseline factor and the rate of radiographic progression, with subsequent matrix model development performed using multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 1371 patients were included in the analysis, with a radiographic progression rate of 27.4%. The 3 baseline predictors of radiographic progression, based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient, were 28 swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and physician global assessment (PhGA). A matrix model showed that the predicted risk of radiographic progression was higher with the increased level of SJC28, CRP, and PhGA (P Conclusions In this pooled analysis of phase III clinical trial data of biosimilars for RA, identifiable baseline factors (SJC28, CRP, and PhGA) associated with radiographic progression were similar to those described in prior studies. Even though radiographic progression was minimal, a small number of patients who have increased SJC28, CRP, and PhGA at baseline should be closely monitored and follow treat-to-target approach. Clinical trial registration numbers EudraCT 2012-005026-30. Registered 30 April 2013, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2012-005026-30/results EudraCT 2012-005733-37. Registered 10 July 2013, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2012-005733-37/results EudraCT 2013-005013-13. Registered 01 April 2014, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2013-005013-13/results

Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are at increased risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ). Zoster recombinant adjuvanted (ZRA) is a recombinant vaccine approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018. Concern has been raised that the ZRA may trigger disease flares in rheumatology patients who are immunocompromised. We investigated the impact of the ZRA vaccine in patients with RA and SRD and measured the incidence of flares and side effects. Methods A flare was defined as occurring within 12 weeks of vaccine administration by either 1) documentation of RA flare in office notes, telephone encounter, or patient portal communication or 2) new or increased dose of corticosteroids. Results We identified 403 patients (239 patients with RA and 164 patients with SRD) who received the ZRA vaccine from February 1, 2018, to February 1, 2019. We measured a 6.7% (n = 27) incidence of flare. Side effects occurred in 12.7% (n = 51) of patients. All flares and side effects were regarded as mild. Three cases of HZ were reported as occurring 2, 10, and 11 months after the vaccination. Conclusion In 403 patients who received the ZRA vaccine, the incidence of disease flares was 7% or less and that of side effects was 13% or less, both of which are less than the incidence rates observed in the pivotal trials.

OBJECTIVE Seropositivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)/rheumatoid factor (RF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased overall mortality; however, the association between antibody titers and mortality is not well established. Investigating relationships between antibody titers and mortality may clarify their role in RA pathogenesis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of antibody titers with mortality and its modification by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS Eligible patients with established RA were identified through administrative claims data linked to laboratory results (2005-2016). Patients were categorized by positivity status for ACPA, RF, or both. Patients were further divided into groups by autoantibody titers. DMARD-exposed patients were categorized into biologic DMARD (bDMARD) and conventional DMARD (cDMARD) subcohorts. Crude mortality rates/1,000 patient-years and Kaplan-Meier curves were compared between antibody categories. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression and sensitivity (propensity-matched patients) analyses were conducted. RESULTS Overall, 53,849 and 79,926 patients had evaluable ACPA and RF status, respectively. For both autoantibodies, mortality rates were significantly higher in seropositive versus seronegative patients (risk increase of 48.0% and 44.0% in ACPA- and RF-positive patients, respectively; P < 0.001 each). Mortality rates were greatest in patients with higher versus lower autoantibody titers (ACPA hazard ratio [HR] 1.60 [95% confidence interval (95% CI]) 1.45-1.76]; RF HR 1.78 [95% CI 1.66-1.91]). In cDMARD-exposed patients, HRs were higher in seropositive versus seronegative cohorts; in bDMARD-exposed patients, there was no difference in mortality by serostatus. CONCLUSION Elevated ACPA/RF titers were independently associated with increased mortality among patients with RA and persisted in patients treated with cDMARDs but not with bDMARDs.

Background: Publications suggest immunomodulation co-therapy improves responder rates in uncontrolled/refractory gout patients undergoing pegloticase treatment. The MIRROR open-label trial showed a 6-month pegloticase+methotrexate co-therapy responder rate of 79%, compared to an established 42% pegloticase monotherapy responder rate. Longer-term efficacy/safety data are presented here.Methods: Uncontrolled gout patients (serum urate [SU]≥6 mg/dL and SU≥6 mg/dL despite urate-lowering therapy [ULT], ULT intolerance, or functionally-limiting tophi) were included. Patients with immunocompromised status, G6PD deficiency, severe kidney disease, or methotrexate contraindication were excluded. Oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) and folic acid (1 mg/day) were administered 4-weeks before and during pegloticase therapy. Twelve-month responder rate (SUResults: Fourteen patients were included (all male, 49.3 ± 8.7 years, 13.8 ± 7.4 year gout history, pre-therapy SU: 9.2 ± 2.5 mg/dL). Three patients were non-responders and discontinued study treatment before 24-weeks, one patient exited the study per-protocol at 24-weeks (enrolled prior to treatment extension amendment), and 10 remained in study through Week 52. Of the 10, 8 completed 52-weeks of pegloticase+methotrexate and were 12-month responders. The remaining two discontinued pegloticase+methotrexate at Week 24 (met treatment goals) and stayed in study under observation (allopurinol prescribed at physicians’ discretion); one remained a responder at 12-months. At 52-weeks, change from baseline in SU was -8.2 ± 4.1 mg/dL (SU: 1.1 ± 2.4 mg/dL, n=10). Gout flares were common early in treatment but progressively decreased while on therapy (Weeks 1-12: 13/14 [92.9%], Weeks 36-52: 2/8 [25.0%]). One patient recovered from sepsis (serious AE). Two non-responders developed high ADA titres; fewer patients had trough concentrations (Cmin) below quantitation limit (BQL) and median Cmin was higher (1.03 mg/mL vs. BQL) than in pegloticase monotherapy trials.Conclusions: Methotrexate+pegloticase co-therapy was well-tolerated over 12-months, with sustained SU lowering, progressive gout flare reduction, and no new safety concerns. Antibody/PK findings suggest methotrexate attenuates ADA formation, coincident with higher treatment response rates.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03635957, registered 17 August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03635957

Author(s): Shadick, Nancy A; Katz, Patricia; Iannaccone, Christine I; Maica, Gabriela; Coblyn, Jonathan; Weinblatt, Michael E; Cui, Jing | Abstract: ObjectiveLifestyle factors, such as inactivity and obesity, contribute to cognitive decline in the general population, but little is known about how these factors may affect individuals with a chronic inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the clinical and functional risk factors related to a worsening of perceived cognitive function in patients with RA.MethodsWe collected clinical and functional questionnaire data over 10 years in a prospective RA cohort including yearly self-reported memory, concentration, and word-finding difficulties graded from "never" to "often." Generalized estimating equation models examined the role of exercise (defined as those meeting the Department of Health and Human Services physical activity guidelines of 75 minutes of vigorous or 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity per week), body mass index (BMI), sleep, depression (Mental Health Index-Depression), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-c-reactive protein (CRP)3 score, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, and corticosteroid use from the previous year as predictors of cognitive complaints that progressed to "often" compared with the previous year (the first year (T i ) progressed to "often" 1 year later (T i+1)).ResultsOf 1219 RA subjects, 127 (10.4%) described either poor memory, concentration, or word-finding difficulties as affecting them "often" at study entry. RA patients (n = 1092, mean age = 56.5 years, 82% female, 58% college educated) were less likely to report word-finding difficulties, poor memory, and concentration as "often" if they were physically active (p = 0.0001, P = 0.01, P l 0.0001, respectively). Female RA patients developed more concentration complaints compared with males (P = 0.03); patients taking an anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy were less likely to complain of poor memory (P = 0.01). Sleep, BMI, fatigue, depression, DAS28-CRP3, methotrexate, and corticosteroid use were not independently associated with a worsening of any cognitive complaints.ConclusionRA patients who are physically active are less likely to report cognitive difficulties. Our study suggests potential modifiable risk factors for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in RA.

Objective To assess the frequency of cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events in clinical studies of baricitinib, an oral, selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor approved in more than 50 countries for the treatment of moderately‐to‐severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Data were pooled from 9 RA studies. Placebo comparison up to 24 weeks included data from 6 studies. Randomized dose comparison between baricitinib doses of 2 mg and 4 mg used data from 4 studies and from the associated long‐term extension study. The data analysis set designated “All‐bari‐RA” included all baricitinib exposures at any dose. Results Overall, 3,492 RA patients received baricitinib (7,860 patient‐years of exposure). No imbalance compared to the placebo group was seen in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (incidence rates [IRs] of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 0.8 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib), arterial thrombotic events (ATE) (IRs of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 0.5 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib), or congestive heart failure (CHF) broad term (IRs of 4.3 per 100 patient‐years for placebo and 2.4 per 100 patient‐years for 4 mg baricitinib). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) were reported in 0 of 1,070 patients treated with placebo and 6 of 997 patients treated with 4 mg baricitinib during the placebo‐controlled period; these events were serious in 2 of 6 patients, while all 6 had risk factors and 1 patient developed DVT/PE after discontinuation of the study drug. In the 2 mg–4 mg‐extended data analysis set, IRs of DVT/PE were comparable between the doses across event types (IRs of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years in those receiving 2 mg baricitinib and 0.6 per 100 patient‐years in those receiving 4 mg baricitinib). In the All‐bari‐RA data analysis set, the rates were stable over time, with an IR of DVT/PE of 0.5 per 100 patient‐years. Conclusions In RA clinical trials, no association was found between baricitinib treatment and the incidence of MACE, ATE, or CHF. With regard to incidence of DVT/PE, 6 events occurred in patients treated with 4 mg baricitinib, but no cases of DVT/PE were reported in the placebo group. During longer‐term evaluation, the incidence of DVT/PE was similar between the baricitinib dose groups, with consistent IR values over time, and this was similar to the rates previously reported in patients with RA.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tofacitinib versus those receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. METHODS RA patients who were initiating treatment with tofacitinib or a TNF inhibitor and had not previously received any biologic agent or tofacitinib were identified from the Truven MarketScan database (2012-2016) or Medicare claims (parts A, B, and D) database (2012-2015). Patients were followed up until treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, insurance disenrollment, or administrative censoring. The outcome of VTE was identified using inpatient claims for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined using a Cox proportional hazards model after accounting for confounding through propensity score-based fine-stratification weighting. HRs were pooled across databases using the inverse variance meta-analytic method. RESULTS A total of 34,074 RA patients (mean age 50 years; 5.6% tofacitinib initiators) and 17,086 RA patients (mean age 71 years; 5.8% tofacitinib initiators) were identified from the Truven and Medicare databases, respectively. The crude incidence rates of VTE per 100 person-years were 0.60 (95% CI 0.26-1.19) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.27-0.41) in Truven and 1.12 (95% CI 0.45-2.31) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.76-1.11) in Medicare for patients receiving tofacitinib and patients receiving TNF inhibitors, respectively. Propensity score-adjusted HRs showed no significant differences in the risk of VTE between tofacitinib-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated patients in either database, with a pooled HR of 1.33 (95% CI 0.78-2.24). CONCLUSION Occurrence of VTE in a total of 50,865 RA patients initiating treatment with tofacitinib or a TNF inhibitor was infrequent (

Objective To investigate the incidence and predictors of dyspnea on exertion among subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We investigated dyspnea on exertion using a prospective cohort, the Brigham RA Sequential Study (BRASS). Clinically significant dyspnea on exertion was defined as a score of ≥ 3 (unable to ambulate without breathlessness or worse) on the validated Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (range 0‐5). We analyzed subjects with MRC score < 3 at BRASS baseline and at ≥ 1 year of follow‐up. The MRC scale was administered annually. We determined the incidence rate (IR) of dyspnea on exertion. We used Cox regression to estimate the hazard ration (HR) for dyspnea on exertion occurring one year after potential predictors were assessed. Results We analyzed 829 subjects with RA and no clinically significant dyspnea on exertion during a mean follow‐up period of 3.0 years (SD 1.9). At baseline, mean age was 55.7 years (SD 13.6), 82.4% of subjects were female, and median RA duration was 8 years. During follow‐up, 112 subjects (13.5%) developed incident dyspnea on exertion during 2476 person‐years of follow‐up (incidence rate 45.2 per 1000 person‐years). Independent predictors of incident dyspnea on exertion were older age (HR 1.03 per year, 95% CI, 1.01‐1.04), female sex (HR 2.22, 95% CI, 1.14‐4.29), mild dyspnea (HR 2.62, 95% CI, 1.60‐4.28), and worsened Multi‐Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire score (HR 2.36 per unit, 95% CI, 1.54‐3.60). Methotrexate use, RA disease activity, and seropositivity were not associated with incident dyspnea on exertion after accounting for other dyspnea risk factors. Conclusion Dyspnea on exertion occurred commonly in patients with RA. Older women with impaired physical function were especially vulnerable to developing dyspnea on exertion.

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide general guidance for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. The recommendations do not dictate the care for an individual patient. The ACR considers adherence to the recommendations described in this guideline to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the clinicians in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote beneficial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice. ACR recommendations are not intended to dictate payment or insurance decisions, or drug formularies or other third-party analyses. Third parties that cite ACR guidelines should state that these recommendations are not meant for this purpose. These recommendations cannot adequately convey all uncertainties and nuances of patient care. The American College of Rheumatology is an independent, professional, medical and scientific society that does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse any commercial product or service. OBJECTIVE. To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS. We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS. The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional). CONCLUSION. This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients’ values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.

Drs. Pincus, Bergman, and Yazici have raised some concerns about our published article comparing the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) with simultaneous measures of the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3).1 We believe our publication has clearly established that the validated CDAI scores provide a fundamentally different evaluation of disease status compared with the RAPID3.

Objective To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with tofacitinib compared with TNFis in patients with RA. Methods RA patients initiating tofacitinib or a TNFi without use of any biologic or tofacitinib any time prior were identified from IBM ‘MarketScan’ (2012–18), Medicare (parts A, B and D, 2012–17) or ‘Optum’ Clinformatics (2012–19) and followed until treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, insurance disenrollment or administrative censoring. The primary outcome, VTE, was identified using inpatient claims for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. A Cox proportional hazards model provided hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs after accounting for confounding through propensity score fine-stratification weighting. HRs were pooled across databases with inverse variance meta-analytic method. Results A total of 42 201, 25 078 and 20 374 RA patients were identified from MarketScan, Medicare and Optum, respectively, of whom 7.1, 7.1 and 9.7% were tofacitinib initiators. The crude incidence rates per 100 person-years (95% CI) were 0.42 (0.20–0.77) and 0.35 (0.29–0.42) in MarketScan, 1.18 (0.68–1.92) and 0.83 (0.71–0.97) in Medicare, and 0.19 (0.04–0.57) and 0.34 (0.26–0.44) in Optum for tofacitinib and TNFis, respectively. Propensity score-weighted HRs showed no significant differences in the risk of VTE between tofacitinib and TNFis in any database with a pooled HR (95% CI) of 1.13 (0.77–1.65). Conclusion Overall, VTE occurred infrequently (

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a poorly understood hematologic disorder involving cytokine-induced polyclonal lymphoproliferation, systemic inflammation, and potentially fatal multiorgan failure. Although the etiology of iMCD is unknown, interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an established disease driver in approximately one-third of patients. Anti–IL-6 therapy, siltuximab, is the only US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment. Few options exist for siltuximab nonresponders, and no validated tests are available to predict likelihood of response. We procured and analyzed the largest-to-date cohort of iMCD samples, which enabled classification of iMCD into disease categories, discovery of siltuximab response biomarkers, and identification of therapeutic targets for siltuximab nonresponders. Proteomic quantification of 1178 analytes was performed on serum of 88 iMCD patients, 60 patients with clinico-pathologically overlapping diseases (human herpesvirus-8–associated MCD, N = 20; Hodgkin lymphoma, N = 20; rheumatoid arthritis, N = 20), and 42 healthy controls. Unsupervised clustering revealed iMCD patients have heterogeneous serum proteomes that did not cluster with clinico-pathologically overlapping diseases. Clustering of iMCD patients identified a novel subgroup with superior response to siltuximab, which was validated using a 7-analyte panel (apolipoprotein E, amphiregulin, serum amyloid P-component, inactivated complement C3b, immunoglobulin E, IL-6, erythropoietin) in an independent cohort. Enrichment analyses and immunohistochemistry identified Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling as a candidate therapeutic target that could potentially be targeted with JAK inhibitors in siltuximab nonresponders. Our discoveries demonstrate the potential for accelerating discoveries for rare diseases through multistakeholder collaboration.

Background The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiographic progression. We now extend these findings with additional cohorts to further validate the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor of radiographic progression risk and compare its performance with that of other risk factors. Methods Four cohorts were analyzed: the BRASS and Leiden registries and the OPERA and SWEFOT studies (total N = 953). Treatments included conventional DMARDs and anti-TNFs. Associations of radiographic progression (ΔTSS) per year with the adjusted MBDA score, seropositivity, and clinical measures were evaluated using linear and logistic regression. The adjusted MBDA score was (1) validated in Leiden and SWEFOT, (2) compared with other measures in all four cohorts, and (3) used to generate curves for predicting risk of radiographic progression. Results Univariable and bivariable analyses validated the adjusted MBDA score and found it to be the strongest, independent predicator of radiographic progression (ΔTSS > 5) compared with seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP), baseline TSS, DAS28-CRP, CRP SJC, or CDAI. Neither DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SJC, nor CRP added significant information to the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor, and the frequency of radiographic progression agreed with the adjusted MBDA score when it was discordant with these measures. The rate of progression (ΔTSS > 5) increased from Conclusion The adjusted MBDA score was validated as an RA disease activity measure that is prognostic for radiographic progression. The adjusted MBDA score was a stronger predictor of radiographic progression than conventional risk factors, including seropositivity, and its prognostic ability was not significantly improved by the addition of DAS28-CRP, CRP, SJC, or CDAI.

ObjectiveTo determine the association between novel lifestyle factors on risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), define the threshold at which smoking increases RA-ILD risk, and calculate the degree to which known lifestyle and clinical factors predict RA-ILD.MethodsThis nested case-control study matched incident RA-ILD cases to RA non-ILD controls on age, sex, RA duration, rheumatoid factor, and time from exposure assessment to RA-ILD. Exposures included education, BMI, smoking, anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, race, joint erosions, rheumatoid nodules, C-reactive protein (CRP), disease activity score, functional status, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use, and glucocorticoid use. OR for each exposure on risk of RA-ILD were obtained from logistic regression models. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated based on all lifestyle and clinical exposures.ResultsWe identified 84 incident RA-ILD cases and 233 matched controls. After adjustment, obesity, high-positive CRP (≥ 10 mg/L), and poor functional status (multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ] ≥ 1) were associated with increased risk of RA-ILD (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.11–5.24 vs normal BMI; OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.21–5.64 vs CRP < 3 mg/L; OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.32–7.26 vs MDHAQ < 0.2). Smoking 30 pack-years or more was strongly associated with risk of RA-ILD compared to never smokers (OR 6.06, 95% CI 2.72–13.5). Together, lifestyle and clinical risk factors for RA-ILD had an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73–0.85).ConclusionObesity, CRP, functional status, and extensive smoking may be novel risk factors for RA-ILD that may be useful for RA-ILD risk assessment and prevention. The overall ability to predict RA-ILD remains modest.

ObjectiveTo examine the efficacy and safety of pegloticase in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with uncontrolled gout in an exploratory, open-label clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03635957) prior to a randomized, controlled trial.MethodsA multicenter, open-label efficacy and safety study of pegloticase with MTX co-treatment was conducted in patients with uncontrolled gout. Patients were administered oral MTX (15 mg/week) and folic acid (1 mg/day) 4 weeks prior to and throughout pegloticase treatment. The primary study outcome was the proportion of responders, defined as serum uric acid (sUA) < 6 mg/dL for ≥ 80% of the time during Month 6 (Weeks 20, 22, and 24). All analyses were performed on a modified intent-to-treat population, defined as patients who received ≥ 1 pegloticase infusion.ResultsSeventeen patients were screened and 14 patients (all men, average age 49.3 ± 8.7 years) were enrolled. On Day 1, mean sUA was 9.2 ± 2.5 mg/dL, and 12 of the 14 patients had visible tophi. At the 6-month timepoint, 11/14 (78.6%, 95% CI 49.2–95.3%) met the responder definition, with 3 patients discontinuing after meeting protocol-defined treatment discontinuation rules (preinfusion sUA values > 6 mg/dL at 2 consecutive scheduled visits). All patients tolerated MTX. No new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionIn this study, an increased proportion of patients maintained therapeutic response at 6 months when treated concomitantly with MTX and pegloticase as compared to the previously reported 42% using pegloticase alone. These results support the need for a randomized study of MTX or placebo with pegloticase to validate these open-label findings.

To date, the impact of background glucocorticoids (GC) on the efficacy and safety of abatacept or adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not clearly established. This post hoc analysis of (AMPLE) trial (NCT00929864) compared efficacy and safety outcomes over 2 years in patients treated with abatacept or adalimumab plus background methotrexate (MTX), who continued GC (&le, 10 mg/day) versus those who were not receiving GC (no-GC). Of 646 randomized patients, 317 received abatacept + MTX (161 GC, 156 no-GC) and 326 received adalimumab + MTX (162 GC, 164 no-GC). At Year 2, the adjusted mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28 C-reactive protein (CRP)) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were not significantly different in the GC versus no-GC subgroups receiving abatacept or adalimumab. A similar proportion of patients achieved remission, HAQ-DI score improvement &ge, 0.3 and radiographic progression rates. No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between GC versus no-GC subgroups either with abatacept or adalimumab. In patients with active RA of similar baseline disease activity treated with abatacept or adalimumab plus background MTX, there was no additional value of background GC on clinical, functional or radiographic outcomes over two years.

SB4, SB2, and SB5 are biosimilars of etanercept (ETN), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA), respectively. This pooled analysis evaluated the immunogenicity of these treatments across three phase...

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance to rheumatology providers on the management of adult rheumatic disease in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A task force, including 10 rheumatologists and 4 infectious disease specialists from North America, was convened. Clinical questions were collated, and an evidence report was rapidly generated and disseminated. Questions and drafted statements were reviewed and assessed using a modified Delphi process. This included 2 rounds of asynchronous anonymous voting by e-mail and 3 webinars with the entire panel. Task force members voted on agreement with draft statements using a 1-9-point numerical scoring system, and consensus was determined to be low, moderate, or high based on the dispersion of votes. For approval, median votes were required to meet predefined levels of agreement (median values of 7-9, 4-6, and 1-3 defined as agreement, uncertainty, or disagreement, respectively) with either moderate or high levels of consensus. RESULTS: The task force approved 77 initial guidance statements: 36 with moderate and 41 with high consensus. These were combined, resulting in 25 final guidance statements. CONCLUSION: These guidance statements are provided to promote optimal care during the current pandemic. However, given the low level of available evidence and the rapidly evolving literature, this guidance is presented as a "living document," and future updates are anticipated.

Objective To provide guidance to rheumatology providers on the management of adult rheumatic disease in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods A task force, including 10 rheumatologists and 4 infectious disease specialists from North America, was convened. Clinical questions were collated, and an evidence report was rapidly generated and disseminated. Questions and drafted statements were reviewed and assessed using a modified Delphi process. This included asynchronous anonymous voting by email and webinars with the entire panel. Task force members voted on agreement with draft statements using a 1-9-point numerical scoring system, and consensus was determined to be low, moderate, or high based on the dispersion of votes. For approval, median votes were required to meet predefined levels of agreement (median values of 7-9, 4-6, and 1-3 defined as agreement, uncertainty, or disagreement, respectively) with either moderate or high levels of consensus. Results Draft guidance statements approved by the task force have been combined to form final guidance. Conclusion These guidance statements are provided to promote optimal care during the current pandemic. However, given the low level of available evidence and the rapidly evolving literature, this guidance is presented as a "living document," and future updates are anticipated.

Objective To develop and evaluate an adjusted score for the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test to account for the effects of age, sex and adiposity in patients with RA. Methods Two models were developed to adjust MBDA score for age, sex and adiposity, using either serum leptin concentration or BMI as proxies for adiposity. Two cohorts were studied. A cohort of 325 781 RA patients who had undergone commercial MBDA testing and had data for age, sex and serum leptin concentration was used for both models. A cohort of 1411 patients from five studies/registries with BMI data was used only for the BMI-adjusted MBDA score. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses evaluated the adjusted MBDA scores and conventional clinical measures as predictors of radiographic progression, assessed in terms of modified total Sharp score (ΔmTSS). Results Two models were developed, based on findings that MBDA score was higher in females than males and increased with age, leptin concentration and BMI. In pairwise regression analyses, the leptin-adjusted (P = 0.00066) and BMI-adjusted (P = 0.0027) MBDA scores were significant independent predictors of ΔmTSS after adjusting for DAS28-CRP, whereas DAS28-CRP was not, after adjusting for leptin-adjusted (P = 0.74) or BMI-adjusted (P = 0.87) MBDA score. Moreover, the leptin-adjusted MBDA score was a significant predictor of ΔmTSS after adjusting for the BMI-adjusted MBDA score (P = 0.025) or the original MBDA score (0.027), whereas the opposite was not true. Conclusion Leptin-adjusted MBDA score significantly adds information to DAS28-CRP and the original MBDA score in predicting radiographic progression. It may offer improved clinical utility for personalized management of RA.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety and efficacy of ABT-122, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and interleukin-17A (IL-17A)-targeted dual variable domain immunoglobulin, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have experienced an inadequate response to methotrexate. METHODS Patients (n = 240) were randomized to receive ABT-122 (120 or 240 mg every week), adalimumab (40 mg every other week), or placebo in a 12-week double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving ≥20% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Secondary and exploratory 12-week end points included 50% improvement (ACR50) and 70% improvement (ACR70) response rates, and proportion of patients meeting the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response criteria for ≥75% (PASI75) and ≥90% (PASI90) improvement in skin scores among those with ≥3% of their body surface area affected by psoriasis. RESULTS In both ABT-122 dose groups, ACR20 response rates at week 12 (64.8-75.3%) were superior to that in patients receiving placebo (25.0%) (P < 0.001) but similar to that in patients receiving adalimumab (68.1%). ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were also superior in both ABT-122 dose groups (36.6-53.4% and 22.5-31.5%, respectively) compared to the placebo group (12.5% and 4.2%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Among eligible patients in the placebo, adalimumab, ABT-122 120 mg every week, and ABT-122 240 mg every week treatment groups, PASI75 responses were achieved in 27.3%, 57.6%, 74.4%, and 77.6% of patients, respectively, whereas PASI90 responses were achieved in 18.2%, 45.5%, 48.8%, and 46.9% of patients, respectively. Frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events, including infections, were similar across all treatment groups, causing no discontinuations. No serious infections or systemic hypersensitivity reactions were reported with ABT-122. CONCLUSION Dual neutralization of TNF and IL-17A with ABT-122 had efficacy and safety that was similar to, and not broadly differentiated from, that of adalimumab over a 12-week treatment course in patients with PsA.

OBJECTIVE Current validated cardiovascular (CV) risk estimates were developed in populations with relatively stable levels of inflammation, whereas patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) routinely experience significant changes in inflammation. This study was undertaken to test whether changes in inflammation affect estimated CV risk as measured using validated population-based risk calculators. METHODS Participants in a prospective RA cohort who experienced a decrease or an increase of ≥10 mg/liter in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level at 2 consecutive time points 1 year apart (CRP decrease group and CRP increase group, respectively) were included in this study. We estimated 10-year CV risk using the following calculators: Framingham Risk Score, 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score, Reynolds Risk Score (RRS), and QRISK2. Of these calculators, only the RRS includes a variable addressing the CRP level. Paired t-tests were performed to compare risk scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up. We calculated the correlations between the changes in risk scores and changes in pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro BNP), a surrogate marker of CV risk. RESULTS One hundred eighty RA patients were included in the study (mean age 57.8 years, 84% female, 80% seropositive). Of the calculators studied, only the RRS was sensitive to changes in inflammation; an increase in inflammation was associated with increased estimated CV risk (P < 0.0001), and only the RRS was correlated with changes in proBNP (r = 0.17, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION Our data showed no significant change in CV risk estimated using validated general population CV risk calculators except for the RRS. These findings suggest that CV risk may be modulated by changes in inflammation in RA, which is not typically considered when using existing CV risk calculators.

Objective The 24-week equivalent efficacy and comparable safety results of the biosimilar SB5 and reference adalimumab (ADA) from the phase III randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported previously. We undertook this transition study to evaluate patients who switched from ADA to SB5 or who continued to receive SB5 or ADA up to 52 weeks. Methods In this phase III study, patients were initially randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or ADA (40 mg subcutaneously every other week). At 24 weeks, patients receiving ADA were rerandomized 1:1 to continue with ADA (ADA/ADA group) or to switch to SB5 (ADA/SB5 group) up to week 52; patients receiving SB5 continued with SB5 for 52 weeks (SB5 group). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were evaluated up to 52 weeks. Results The full analysis set population consisted of 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the ADA overall group [patients who were randomized to receive ADA at week 0], 125 in the ADA/SB5 group, and 129 in the ADA/ADA group). The percentages of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70 response) at week 24 were maintained after the transition from ADA to SB5, and these response rates were comparable across treatment groups throughout the study. ACR20 response rates ranged from 73.4% to 78.8% at week 52. Radiographic progression was minimal and comparable across treatment groups. The safety profile and the incidence of antidrug antibodies were comparable across treatment groups after transition. Conclusion SB5 was well tolerated over 1 year in patients with RA, with efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity comparable to those of ADA. Switching from ADA to SB5 had no treatment-emergent issues such as increased adverse events, increased immunogenicity, or loss of efficacy.

Introduction To assess the relationship between low bone mineral density (BMD), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 (anti-CCP2) antibodies, and disease activity in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients enrolled in a single-center, observational cohort registry of patients with RA. Eligible patients had known BMD, as measured by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR–BMD), and anti-CCP2 antibody measurements at the same time point or within 6 months. Anti-CCP2–immunoglobulin (Ig)G-positive (+) patients (≥ 20 U/mL) were distributed into three equal groups (Gp1–3), representing increasing anti-CCP2 antibody concentrations. Associations between BMD and anti-CCP2 antibody status and titer were explored in multivariate regression analyses controlling for covariates (including age, duration of RA, use of steroids, use of osteoporosis medication). Association between disease activity (DAS28 [CRP] Results A total of 149 patients (all women) were included (47 anti-CCP2 antibody negative [−], 102 anti-CCP2+ [34\titer group]). Mean disease duration was greater in the three anti-CCP2+ groups vs. the anti-CCP2− group. DXR–BMD was lower in the anti-CCP2+ vs. the anti-CCP2− groups (Gp1–3 vs. anti-CCP2−: P P P = 0.0181). Conclusion Among patients with established RA, data suggest that anti-CCP2+ patients, particularly those with high anti-CCP2 antibody titers, have lower hand BMD, and patients with lower hand BMD are less likely to have low disease activity. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT01793103.

The 19th annual international Targeted Therapies meeting brought together over 100 leading basic scientists and clinical researchers from around the world in the field of immunology, molecular biology and rheumatology and other specialties. During the meeting, breakout sessions were held consisting of 5 disease-specific groups with 20-40 experts assigned to each group based on clinical or scientific expertise. Specific groups included: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematous, connective tissue diseases (e.g. Sjogren's syndrome, Systemic sclerosis, vasculitis including Bechet's and IgG4 related disease), and a basic science immunology group spanning all of the above clinical domains. In each group, experts were asked to consider and update previously identified unmet needs in 3 categorical areas: basic/translational science, clinical science and therapeutic development, and clinical care. Overall, similar primary unmet needs were identified within each disease foci, and several additional needs were identified since the time of last year's congress. Within translational/basic science, the need for better understanding the heterogeneity within each disease was highlighted so that predictive tools for therapeutic responses can be developed. Within clinical science and therapeutic trials, a strong focus was placed upon the need to identify pre-clinical states of disease allowing prevention in those at risk. The ability to cure remains perhaps the ultimate unmet need. Further, the need to develop new and affordable therapeutics, as well as to conduct strategic trials of currently approved therapies was again highlighted. Within the clinical care realm, improved co-morbidity management and patient-centered care were identified as unmet needs. Lastly, it was strongly felt there was a need to develop a scientific infrastructure for well-characterized, longitudinal cohorts paired with biobanks and mechanisms to support data-sharing. This infrastructure could facilitate many of the unmet needs identified within each disease area.

Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often ask whether specific foods, popularized as inflammatory or antiinflammatory, can improve or worsen their RA. Patients with RA took a survey on diet and RA symptoms, and the survey data were collected and analyzed. Methods A dietary survey was mailed to 300 subjects in a single-center RA registry at a large academic center. Subjects were asked about their consumption of 20 foods and whether these foods make their RA symptoms better, worse, or unchanged. Semiannual registry data include demographics, medications, comorbidities, and disease activity scores. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests evaluated associations between subject characteristics from the most recent registry assessment and changes in RA symptoms from specific foods. Results Of the 217 subjects (72% response rate), 83% were female; the median RA duration was 17 years (interquartile range 9–27 years), and 58% were taking a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Twenty-four percent of subjects reported that foods affect their RA symptoms, with 15% reporting improvement and 19% reporting worsening. Blueberries and spinach were the foods most often reported to improve RA symptoms, while soda with sugar and desserts were those most often reported to worsen RA symptoms. Younger age and noting that sleep, warm room temperature, and vitamin/mineral supplements improve RA were each associated with reporting that foods affect RA symptoms. Medication use, sex, body mass index, smoking, disease duration, disease activity scores, and self-reported RA flares were not associated with reporting that foods affect RA. Conclusion Nearly one-quarter of RA subjects with longstanding disease reported that diet had an effect on their RA symptoms.

Objective SB5 is a biosimilar agent for adalimumab (ADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of SB5 in comparison with reference ADA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with moderately to severely active RA despite treatment with methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or reference ADA at a dosage of 40 mg subcutaneously every other week. The primary efficacy end point was the response rate based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the per-protocol set (completer analysis). Additional end points included efficacy, PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. Results Of the 544 patients randomized to receive a study drug, the full analysis set comprised 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the reference ADA group) and the per-protocol set comprised 476 patients (239 receiving SB5, 237 receiving reference ADA). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was equivalent between those receiving SB5 and those receiving reference ADA (72.4% and 72.2%, respectively); the difference in the ACR20 response rate (0.1%, [95% confidence interval −7.83%, 8.13%]) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±15%). Similar results were seen in the full analysis set (missing data being considered a nonresponse). The SB5 and reference ADA treatment groups were comparable across other end points, including the ACR 50% and ACR 70% improvement response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PK data, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, and the antidrug antibody response. Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy and safety of SB5 and reference ADA were comparable regardless of antidrug antibody status. Conclusion The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was equivalent between patients treated with the biosimilar agent SB5 and those treated with reference ADA. SB5 and reference ADA were both well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles, in patients with RA.

Objective Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with fibromyalgia (FM) have higher disease activity, greater medical costs, and worse quality of life compared to RA patients without FM. We determined the impact of FM on 2-year changes in the functional status of RA patients in a prospective study. Methods Subjects included participants in the Brigham Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study who were enrolled in a substudy of the effects of pain in RA. Subjects completed questionnaires, including the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Polysymptomatic Distress (PSD) scale, semiannually, and underwent physical examination and laboratory tests yearly. Results Of the 156 included RA subjects, 16.7% had FM, while 83.3% did not. In a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, race, baseline MDHAQ score, disease duration, rheumatoid factor/cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity, disease activity, and psychological distress, RA patients with FM had a 0.14 greater 2-year increase in MDHAQ score than RA patients without FM (P = 0.021). In secondary analyses examining the association between continuous PSD scale score and change in MDHAQ, higher PSD scale scores were significantly associated with greater 2-year increases in MDHAQ score (β coefficient 0.013, P = 0.011). Conclusion Both the presence of FM and increasing number of FM symptoms predicted worsening of functional status among individuals with RA. Among individuals with RA and FM, the magnitude of the difference in changes in MDHAQ was 4- to 7-fold higher than typical changes in MDHAQ score among individuals with established RA.

Objective: In disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had achieved sustained low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate of ≤3.2 at both week 40 and week 52) after 1 year of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) at a standard dose (200 mg every 2 weeks plus optimized methotrexate [MTX]), we evaluated whether continuation of CZP treatment at a standard dose or at a reduced frequency (200 mg every 4 weeks plus MTX) was superior to stopping CZP (placebo plus MTX) in maintaining low disease activity for 1 additional year. Methods: A total of 293 patients from period 1 of our study were re-randomized 2:3:2 in period 2 to CZP at a standard dose (n = 84), CZP at a reduced frequency (n = 127), or placebo plus MTX (CZP stopped) (n = 82). The primary end point was the percentage of patients who maintained low disease activity throughout weeks 52–104 without flares. We used a hierarchical testing scheme, comparing CZP at a standard dose with CZP stopped. If P < 0.05 was achieved, then CZP at a reduced frequency was compared with CZP stopped (nonresponder imputation). Results: The 293 patients from period 1 represented 36% fewer patients than projected, yielding a smaller number of patients eligible for period 2. Higher proportions of patients treated with the standard and reduced frequency regimens maintained low disease activity than those who had stopped CZP (48.8% and 53.2%, respectively, versus 39.2% [P = 0.112 and P = 0.041, respectively; nominal P value, first hierarchical test not significant]). Similar trends were observed for radiographic nonprogression (change from baseline of ≤0.5 in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score; 79.2% and 77.9% of patients, respectively, versus 70.3%) and normative physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score of ≤0.5; 71.4% and 70.6% of patients, respectively, versus 57.0%). Safety profiles were similar between all groups, with no new safety signals identified for continuing CZP to week 104. No deaths were reported. Conclusion: The study failed to meet its primary end point. However, there were no clinically meaningful differences between the standard and reduced frequency doses of CZP plus MTX; both controlled RA more effectively than stopping CZP.

Objective: To characterize physical activity (PA) participation (meeting ≥150-minutes of moderate intensity or 75-minutes of vigorous (MVPA/week)), examine associations between disease activity and MVPA and identify MVPA correlates in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 3 years. Methods: This study included 573 RA patients (94% Caucasian, 83% female, mean age 61 years, mean RA duration 19.5 years) with ≥1 annual registry visit and who completed the PA questionnaire. Baseline and annual measures included: demographics/medical history, self-efficacy for disease management, quality of life, patient/physician global assessment, physical function, and self-reported PA. A logistic repeated measures model using the Generalized Estimation Equation examined the relationship between disease activity and MVPA. Results: Average disease activity (DAS28-CRP3) was 3.1 (SD, 1.4), 36% were physically inactive and 29% met MVPA recommendations. There was a negative borderline association with disease activity (OR=0.89; 95%CI 0.79–1.00). Correlates of meeting MVPA recommendations, adjusting for disease activity, were being Caucasian (OR=2.95; 95%CI 1.29–6.75), older age (age >69 OR=0.58; 95%CI 0.36–0.92) poor mental health (OR=0.63; 95%CI 0.41–0.95), poor physical function (OR=0.59; 95%CI 0.34–1.01), overweight/obese (body mass index >25–30 OR=0.69; 95%CI 0.50–0.95; >30–39.9 OR=0.60; 95%CI 0.41–0.88; ≤40 OR=0.24; 95%CI 0.08–0.74) and patient global assessment (≥10-20) OR=0.57; 95%CI 0.39–0.83). Conclusions: A small proportion met MVPA recommendations despite well-controlled disease. Disease activity was negatively associated with PA over time. PA correlates were linked to lifestyle, mental health and patient perceptions of disease, suggesting PA interventions that address patient perspectives may facilitate RA management. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Objective To quantify differences and determine the factors contributing to the difference in patient global assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity (PtGA) between RA patients with multiple morbidities (RA-MM) and those with RA only. Methods We compared the PtGA between RA-MM patients and those with RA only, followed up in a longitudinal cohort (n = 1,040). In analyses performed on RA-MM patients (n = 575) and those with RA only (matched for swollen joint count, tender joint count, evaluator global assessment, and disease duration), the mean difference in PtGA (ΔPtGA) between the 2 groups was assessed. The contribution of patient characteristics to the explained variation of ΔPtGA in the matched cohort was calculated as semipartial R2 and summarized as the percentage of the total R2 in linear regression models. Results RA-MM patients reported higher (or worse) PtGA, with an increased PtGA associated with more morbidities (P for linear trend

ObjectivesDespite the therapeutic value of current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, agents with alternative modes of action are required. Mavrilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-α, was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe RA.MethodsIn a phase IIb study (NCT01706926), patients with inadequate response to ≥1 synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s), Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)−C reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥3.2, ≥4 swollen joints despite methotrexate (MTX) were randomised 1:1:1:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (150, 100, 30 mg), or placebo every other week (eow), plus MTX for 24 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were DAS28−CRP change from baseline to week 12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate (week 24).Results326 patients were randomised (150 mg, n=79; 100 mg, n=85; 30 mg, n=81; placebo, n=81); 305 completed the study (September 2012–June 2013). Mavrilimumab treatment significantly reduced DAS28−CRP scores from baseline compared with placebo (change from baseline (SE); 150 mg: −1.90 (0.14), 100 mg: −1.64 (0.13), 30 mg: −1.37 (0.14), placebo: −0.68 (0.14); pSignificantly more mavrilimumab-treated patients achieved ACR20 compared with placebo (week 24: 73.4%, 61.2%, 50.6% vs 24.7%, respectively (pConclusionsMavrilimumab significantly decreased RA disease activity, with clinically meaningful responses observed 1 week after treatment initiation, representing a novel mechanism of action with persuasive therapeutic potential.Trial registration numberNCT01706926; results.

Baricitinib is an oral, reversible inhibitor of the Janus kinases JAK1 and JAK2 that may have therapeutic value in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.We conducted a 52-week, phase 3, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial in which 1307 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving background therapy with methotrexate were randomly assigned to one of three regimens in a 3:3:2 ratio: placebo (switched to baricitinib after 24 weeks), 4 mg of baricitinib once daily, or 40 mg of adalimumab (an anti-tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) every other week. End-point measures evaluated after adjustment for multiplicity included 20% improvement according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20 response) (the primary end point), the Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28), the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and the Simplified Disease Activity Index at week 12, as well as radiographic progression of joint damage as measured by the van der Heijde modification of the total Sharp score (mTSS) (range, 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) at week 24.More patients had an ACR20 response at week 12 with baricitinib than with placebo (primary end point, 70% vs. 40%, P0.001). All major secondary objectives were met, including inhibition of radiographic progression of joint damage, according to the mTSS at week 24 with baricitinib versus placebo (mean change from baseline, 0.41 vs. 0.90; P0.001) and an increased ACR20 response rate at week 12 with baricitinib versus adalimumab (70% vs. 61%, P=0.014). Adverse events, including infections, were more frequent through week 24 with baricitinib and adalimumab than with placebo. Cancers were reported in five patients (two who received baricitinib and three who received placebo). Baricitinib was associated with reductions in neutrophil counts and increases in levels of creatinine and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.In patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had had an inadequate response to methotrexate, baricitinib was associated with significant clinical improvements as compared with placebo and adalimumab. (Funded by Eli Lilly and Incyte; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01710358 .).

Background:The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) blood test measures 12 protein biomarkers (IL-6, CRP, SAA, EGF, VEGF, VCAM, MMP-1, MMP-3, leptin, resistin, TNF-RI and YKL40). It uses a validated algorithm to provide a score on a scale of 1-100 for assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The MBDA score reflects several molecular aspects of inflammation, including cytokines, acute phase reactants, growth factors, molecular adhesion, metalloproteinases and hormones. Insights gained by understanding how vaccination affects these biomarkers in healthy subjects - in whom the level of inflammation prior to vaccination should be low and stable - may aid the understanding of how vaccination affects patients with RA.Objectives:The goal of this study was to understand how immunization of healthy subjects with the influenza vaccine affects the assessment of inflammation with the MBDA score and its 12 biomarkers.Methods:A 4-strain influenza virus vaccine (Fluarix Quadrivalent, GlaxoSmithKline) was administered intramuscularly to 22 healthy volunteer subjects on October 24, 2018. Serum samples were obtained immediately prior to vaccination (baseline) and 1, 2 and 3 weeks after vaccination. No restrictions were placed on subject activity. Samples were stored at -80oC until measurement of the 12 MBDA biomarkers for determination of the adjusted MBDA score, hereafter called the MBDA score. (Adjustment accounts for the effects of age, sex and adiposity1). MBDA scores (natural scale) and biomarker concentrations (log scale) were modeled using generalized estimating equations (GEE) that account for correlations between measurements from the same subject at multiple timepoints. Significance of MBDA score change or biomarker concentration change over time was determined by a likelihood ratio test of timepoints.Results:Of the 22 healthy subjects receiving the influenza virus vaccine, 14 (63.6%) were female, with mean (SD) age of 40.0 years (8.9). MBDA scores were low (44) for 15 (68%), 6 (27%) and 1 (5%) subjects at baseline, and this distribution was stable over time (Figure 1). Overall, MBDA scores did not change significantly over time (p=0.48, Figure 2). Mean changes in MBDA score (95% CI) from baseline to weeks 1, 2 and 3 were 0.32 (-3.07, 3.71), 0.82 (-3.03, 4.67) and 2.86 (-1.10, 6.82), respectively (Figure 2); the week 3 value becomes 0.95 (-1.78, 3.68) if the week 3 outlier is removed. Among the 66 post-baseline measurements of change in MBDA score (Figure 2), 3 (5%) exceeded the 95% CI for change in MBDA score in this study (i.e., 14). When assessing the entire cohort across all timepoints, EGF was the only biomarker that demonstrated statistically significant change over time (p=5.6 x 10-7). At weeks 1, 2 and 3, the mean relative concentrations of EGF, compared with baseline, were 0.62 (0.52, 0.74), 0.86 (0.70, 1.06) and 0.62 (0.50, 0.76), respectively.Figure 1Figure 2Conclusion:Immunization of 22 healthy subjects with a quadrivalent influenza vaccine did not have a statistically significant effect on MBDA scores during a 3-week observation, and it had minimal effect on the component biomarkers.References:[1]Curtis et al.Rheumatology [Oxford]2018;58:874Disclosure of Interests:Daniel Furst Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, BMS, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, BMS, Cytori Therapeutics, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech, Speakers bureau: CMC Connect (McCann Health Company), Lauren Lenz Shareholder of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Employee of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Megan Horton Shareholder of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Employee of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Darl Flake Shareholder of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Employee of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Eric Sasso Shareholder of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Employee of: Myriad Genetics, Inc., Michael E. Weinblatt Grant/research support from: BMS, Amgen, Lilly, Crescendo and Sonofi-Regeneron, Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Abbvie, Crescendo, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Gilead

Background:RA is a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestation. Recent advances in serum proteomics, such as the SomaScan®platform (SomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, USA), allow for a deeper exploration of the protein biomarkers associated with RA and a better understanding of the molecular aetiology of the disease.Objectives:To characterise the differences in baseline serum proteome of patients with RA (enrolled in the Phase IIIb Abatacept vs adaliMumab comParison in bioLogic-naïvERA subjects with background MTX [AMPLE] study)1compared with a healthy population, and to identify serum protein biomarkers associated with disease severity and radiographic progression.Methods:Patients in the AMPLE study had an inadequate response to MTX and were naïve to biologic DMARDs. Protein abundance was assessed in baseline serum samples from 440 AMPLE study patients and 123 healthy individuals with matching demographics using the SomaScan®platform, with 5000+ slow off-rate modified aptamers and up to 8 log of dynamic range.2Differential abundance testing was performed using linear models to identify differences in protein abundance in patients with RA vs healthy individuals. A separate analysis using a linear model was conducted in only the patients with RA to identify the proteins associated with DAS28 (CRP) and TSS. Pathway analyses were performed for proteins significantly (false discovery rate-adjusted p value Results:Compared with healthy individuals, >2000 serum proteins were significantly differentially expressed in patients with RA, including many proteins that have been associated with RA (e.g. serum amyloid A [SAA], CRP) and complement. Most of the protein expression differences were of small magnitude (fold change Conclusion:Our study revealed that thousands of serum proteins are differentially expressed and several pathways are dysregulated between patients with RA and healthy individuals. Additional pathways were identified that reflect disease severity, including joint damage, distinct from those pathways associated with the disease. The SomaScan®platform provides a unique proteomic tool with a wide dynamic range for the identification of serum protein biomarkers associated with RA and disease severity. Proteomic signatures should be considered in clinical trials to better understand disease pathogenesis and predict risk in response to treatment.References:[1]Schiff M, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2014;73:86–94.[2]Gold L, et al.PLoS One2010;5:e15004.Acknowledgments:Rachel Rankin (medical writing, Caudex; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb)Disclosure of Interests:David Galbraith Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Minal Caliskan Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Omar Jabado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sarah Hu Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roy Fleischmann Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, IngelhCentrexion, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Selecta, Taiho, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Michael Weinblatt Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Lily, Sanofi/Regeneron, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Gilead, Horizon, Lily, Pfizer, Roche, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Michael A Maldonado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sheng Gao Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb

Background:Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, has demonstrated favorable efficacy and acceptable safety in five Phase 3 global studies in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1–5Objectives:This analysis reports the efficacy and safety of UPA in predefined RA patient subgroups based on differences in baseline demographics and disease activity.Methods:Data were pooled from three pivotal, double-blind, PBO-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 studies in patients with RA who had an inadequate response(IR) to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR: SELECT-NEXT [N=661]), MTX(MTX-IR; SELECT-COMPARE[N=1629]), or biologic DMARDs(bDMARD-IR: SELECT-BEYOND[N=498]). Two integrated analysis sets were evaluated: one comparing UPA 15 mg QD vs PBO(SELECT-NEXT, SELECT-COMPARE, SELECT-BEYOND) and the other comparing UPA 15 mg QD and UPA 30 mg QD vs PBO(SELECT-NEXT, SELECT-BEYOND). All patients received background treatment with csDMARDs. The proportion of patients achieving ACR20 and DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 was evaluated by predefined baseline demographics and disease activity measure groups, including age, sex, weight, BMI, race, geographic region, duration of RA, RF, and ACPA status, and level of high sensitivity CRP. Non-responder imputation was used for missing data. Subgroup analyses for safety were performed for age, race, sex, weight, BMI, and Asian region.Results:Across the three Phase 3 studies, 1036, 384, and 1041 patients received UPA 15 mg QD, UPA 30 mg QD or PBO, respectively. The demographic and baseline disease characteristics in the two integrated analysis sets were balanced across treatment groups. ACR20 and DAS28 ≤3.2 response rates at Week 12 were consistently higher with UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg vs PBO across the evaluated demographic and baseline disease characteristics(Figure 1a,Figure 1b). The efficacy of UPA 15 mg QD was generally similar to that observed with UPA 30 mg QD. At 12 weeks, the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent AEs, serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were generally comparable across different age, sex, race, weight, and BMI groups. Compared with the global population, patients receiving UPA in the Asian region had a higher rate of CPK elevations(UPA 30 mg only) and herpes zoster; herpes zoster also has been observed to be higher in the Asian region with other JAK inhibitors.6,7Conclusion:In this analysis of pooled integrated efficacy data in csDMARD-IR or bDMARD-IR patients with RA, UPA 15 mg or 30 mg QD in combination with csDMARDs improved efficacy outcomes at Week 12 when compared with PBO across all predefined subgroups evaluated.References:[1]Burmester GR, et al. Lancet 2018 23;391:2503–2512;[2]Genovese MC, et al. Lancet 2018; 391:2513–24;[3]Smolen JS, et al. Lancet 2019 May 23[Epub ahead of print];[4]van Vollenhoven R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70(Suppl. 10): Abstract 891;[5]Fleischmann R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70(Suppl. 10): Abstract 890;[6]Winthrop KL, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2014;66:2675-84;[7] Winthrop KL, et al. ACR 2016 [Abstract 3027]Disclosure of Interests:Michael Weinblatt Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Lily, Sanofi/Regeneron, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Gilead, Horizon, Lily, Pfizer, Roche, Eduardo Mysler Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi, and Pfizer., Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi, and Pfizer, Andrew Ostor Consultant of: MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Abbvie, Novartis, Roche, Gilead and BMS, Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Abbvie, Novartis, Roche, Gilead and BMS, Aaron Broadwell Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, Horizon, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, Pfizer, Radius, Sanofi-Regeneron, UCB, Sławomir Jeka Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Sandoz, Eli Lilly, Egis, UCB, Celgene, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Sandoz, Eli Lilly, Egis, UCB, Celgene, Kendall Dunlap Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Jessica Suboticki Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Jeffrey Enejosa Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Barbara Hendrickson Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Sheng Zhong Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Katya Cherny Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Grace Wright Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Exagen, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Myriad Autoimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme Regeneron, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Exagen, Lilly, Medical Education Resource, Myriad Autoimmune, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme Regeneron, UCB, and Vindico

Background\ud Previous studies of radiological damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have used candidate-gene approaches, or evaluated single genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We undertook the first meta-analysis of GWAS of RA radiological damage to: (1) identify novel genetic loci for this trait; and (2) test previously validated variants.\ud \ud Methods\ud Seven GWAS (2,775 RA cases, of a range of ancestries) were combined in a meta-analysis. Radiological damage was assessed using modified Larsen scores, Sharp van Der Heijde scores, and erosive status. Single nucleotide polymophsim (SNP) associations with radiological damage were tested at a single time-point using regression models. Primary analyses included age and disease duration as covariates. Secondary analyses also included rheumatoid factor (RF). Meta-analyses were undertaken in trans-ethnic and European-only cases.\ud \ud Results\ud In the trans-ethnic primary meta-analysis, one SNP (rs112112734) in close proximity to HLA-DRB1, and strong linkage disequilibrium with the shared-epitope, attained genome-wide significance (P = 4.2x10-8). In the secondary analysis (adjusting for RF) the association was less significant (P = 1.7x10-6). In both trans-ethnic primary and secondary meta-analyses 14 regions contained SNPs with associations reaching P

ObjectivesWe sought to investigate whether genetic effects on response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could be localised by considering known genetic susceptibility loci for relevant traits and to evaluate the usefulness of these genetic loci for stratifying drug response.MethodsWe studied the relation of TNFi response, quantified by change in swollen joint counts ( Δ SJC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate ( Δ ESR) with locus-specific scores constructed from genome-wide assocation study summary statistics in 2938 genotyped individuals: 37 scores for RA; scores for 19 immune cell traits; scores for expression or methylation of 93 genes with previously reported associations between transcript level and drug response. Multivariate associations were evaluated in penalised regression models by cross-validation.ResultsWe detected a statistically significant association between Δ SJC and the RA score at the CD40 locus (p=0.0004) and an inverse association between Δ SJC and the score for expression of CD39 on CD4 T cells (p=0.00005). A previously reported association between CD39 expression on regulatory T cells and response to methotrexate was in the opposite direction. In stratified analysis by concomitant methotrexate treatment, the inverse association was stronger in the combination therapy group and dissipated in the TNFi monotherapy group. Overall, ability to predict TNFi response from genotypic scores was limited, with models explaining less than 1% of phenotypic variance.ConclusionsThe association with the CD39 trait is difficult to interpret because patients with RA are often prescribed TNFi after failing to respond to methotrexate. The CD39 and CD40 pathways could be relevant for targeting drug therapy.

Background: Novel antibody systems including anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibody (anti-CarP IgG) and anti-Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase Antibody (anti-PAD4 IgG) are emerging as independent diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (ref, 1-3). As such, these antibody systems may add value to rheumatoid factor (IgM) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA IgG), the hallmark antibodies in RA. Objectives: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) with antibody systems targeting citrullinated, carbamylated and PAD4 autoantigens in RA. Methods: The cohort consisted of 638 consenting subjects with RA (fulfilling the 1987 or 2010 ACR classification criteria, mean age: 59.8±0.5 years [SEM], 80% female) and a control group of 775 subjects (mean age: 44.7±0.5 years, 85% females, including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [n=369], primary Sjogren’s Syndrome [n=64], Primary Fibromyalgia [n=85], other connective tissue diseases [n=63], and a group of normal healthy donors [n=194]). Autoantibodies titers from serum were measured using fluoroenzyme immunoassays (anti-RF [IgM] and anti-CCP [IgG]; Phadia Upsala, Sweden), ELISA (anti-CarP [IgG], research use only [RUO], Inova Diagnostics, San Diego) and bead-based AptivaTM technology (anti-PAD4 [IgG], RUO, Inova Diagnostics) in a clinical laboratory accredited by the College of American Pathologists. For each positive antibody (above each cutoff) a score of 1 was assigned and the cumulative presence of the 4 antibodies was determined [range 0-4]. The ability of the biomarkers to distinguish RA from controls was calculated using sensitivity, specificity and interval likelihood ratio (LR). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was estimated at 10% pre-test probability. Statistics consisted of Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests. Results: In this cohort anti-CarP IgG (>20 Units) yielded 33.5% sensitivity and 77.9% specificity. Anti-PAD4 (>1000 Units) yielded 35.0% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity. RF IgM (>5 Units/ml) and anti-CCP (>10 Units/ml) were 67.4% and 66.5% sensitive, respectively (87.5% and 97.0% specific, respectively). RA presented 5-fold higher 4-antibody system scores (2.02±0.05) than controls (0.42±0.02); (p Conclusion: This cumulative combination of antibody systems targeting citrullinated, carbamylated, PAD4 and Fc autoantigens (RF IgM) is highly specific for RA. It may be useful in diagnosing and classifying RA even in symptomatic patients who present early in the course of disease. References: [1] Shi, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011 108(42):17372-7 [2] Darrah E et al. Sci Transl Med. 2013 2;5186ra65 [3] Verheul, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Nov;70(11):1721-1731 Disclosure of Interests: Thierry Dervieux Shareholder of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), John Conklin Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Tyler O’Malley Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Kelley Brady Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Roberta Alexander Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Jing Shi Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Claudia Ibarra Shareholder of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Employee of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Michael Mahler Employee of: Inova Diagnostics (Not pharmaceutical, diagnostics company), Joel Kremer Shareholder of: Corrona, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi, Employee of: Corrona, Michael E. Weinblatt Shareholder of: Stock option: CanFite, Lycera, Scipher, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Crescendo Bioscience, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CanFite, Corrona, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Horizon, Lilly, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Scipher, Set Point, Arthur Weinstein Shareholder of: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company), Consultant for: Exagen (a diagnostics company not a pharmaceutical company)

Background Introduction of multiple biologic DMARDs, targeted synthetic DMARDs and biosimilars has led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients (pts) with RA. There are, however, limited head-to-head studies comparing these agents to guide evidence-based treatment decisions. Abatacept versus adaliMumab comParison in bioLogic-naivE RA subjects with background MTX (AMPLE) was the first head-to-head randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) and adalimumab. However, there are limited data replicating AMPLE findings in real-world settings. Objectives To compare effectiveness of ABA versus TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in pts with RA by line of therapy (LOT) and by LOT stratified by anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status using data from real-world clinical practice. Methods Data from two independent RA registries comprising pts treated by physicians in routine care were used for the analysis. An RA disease-specific registry provided data on pts treated with TNFis; the other was a product-specific RA registry and provided data on pts treated with ABA.1,2 The disease-specific registry was a US-based single-centre registry; the product-specific registry was a multi-centre, 12-country registry excluding the US. Frequency matching on age (in years [yrs]; ±4 yrs’ window), RA disease duration (in yrs; ±4 yrs) and baseline CDAI category (remission [≤2.8], low activity [≤10], medium activity [≤22], high activity [>22]) between TNFi and ABA pts was done for biologic-naive and -experienced pts. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise baseline demographics, disease activity measures and serostatus for both treatment groups by LOT. Disease activity in the follow-up period was measured at the 12-month mark (±6 months). Change in disease activity after 12 months was evaluated for TNFi and ABA pts by LOT, and statistical comparison using Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. The analysis was repeated for pts stratified by ACPA status. Results Data for 105 first-line and 91 second- or further-line (subsequent-line) matched pairs of TNFi and ABA pts were included in the analysis (68 first-line and 60 subsequent-line matched pairs of TNFi and ABA pts, respectively, in ACPA+ cohort; 31 first-line and 21 subsequent-line matched pairs of TNFi and ABA pts, respectively, in ACPA– cohort; Table 1). In the biologic-experienced pts, ABA (vs TNFi) had a higher reduction in CDAI score (10.2 vs 5.2, p=0.035; Table 2). In the biologic-experienced ACPA+ pts, ABA (vs TNFi) had higher reduction in disease activity (CDAI: 13.3 vs 6.2, p=0.023; Table 2; SDAI: 13.9 vs 7.0, p=0.046). No difference in disease activity was observed between the two groups among the ACPA– pts. Conclusion Real-world RA registry data further confirm findings from the AMPLE study that the overall efficacy of ABA is similar to TNFi agents in biologic-naive pts with RA. Efficacy of ABA (vs TNFis) in biologic-experienced pts is greater, and greater reductions in joint disease activity in ACPA+ ABA (vs TNFis) pts were observed. References [1] Brigham and Women’s Hospital. BRASS. https://www.brassstudy.org/. Accessed September 12, 2018. [2] Alten R, et al. RMD Open2017;3:e000538. Disclosure of Interests Evo Alemao Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yedid Elbez Employee of: Employee of Excelya which received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb as contract research organization., Aarti Rao Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yogesh Saini Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Christine Iannaccone: None declared, Michael E. Weinblatt Shareholder of: Stock option: CanFite, Lycera, Scipher, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Crescendo Bioscience, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CanFite, Corrona, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Horizon, Lilly, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Scipher, Set Point, Nancy Shadick Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi/Regeneron, Crescendo Biosciences, Mallinckrodt, Amgen, Consultant for: Consulting work for Bristol-Myers Squibb for under $10,000.

Background Upadacitinib (UPA), a JAK1-selective inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in the SELECT-BEYOND study in patients (pts) with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a stable dose of csDMARDs who had inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to bDMARDs,. Objectives In this analysis we evaluated clinical responses among pts receiving UPA and placebo (PBO) based on the number and mechanism of action (MOA) of prior bDMARDs. Methods 498 pts were randomized to UPA 15mg or UPA 30mg once daily (QD) or PBO for 12 weeks (wks), after which pts on PBO received UPA 15 or 30mg QD from Wk 12 onwards.1 Pts were subgrouped by the number and/or MOA of bDMARD(s) received prior to enrollment: 1) lack of efficacy (LoE) to ≥1 anti-TNF, 2) LoE to an anti-IL-6, and 3) the number of prior bDMARDs (1 vs 2 vs ≥3). ACR20/50/70 responses, DAS28-CRP low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.2), CDAI LDA (≤10), and CDAI remission (≤2.8) were evaluated at Wk 12. The frequency and percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in each subgroup was assessed over the first 12 wks. Missing values of the efficacy endpoints were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI). Nominal P-values are reported without multiplicity adjustment. Results Overall baseline disease duration was ∼13 years. The majority of pts had LoE to ≥1 anti-TNF (449, 90%); 88 (18%) had LoE to an anti-IL-6; 235 (47%), 137(28%), and 125 (25%) had been treated with 1, 2, or ≥3 prior bDMARDs, respectively.1 At Wk 12, clinical responses were numerically, and often statistically, better for pts receiving either dose of UPA vs PBO, irrespective of their prior bDMARD exposure and the number of prior bDMARDs received. As most pts had LoE to ≥1 anti-TNF, responses in this group were comparable to the overall study population (Table 1). Pts with LoE to an anti-IL-6 receiving UPA 15 or 30 mg QD experienced improvements vs PBO, particularly in achieving LDA and remission, although responses in these pts were generally lower compared to the overall study population. As expected, there was a trend towards lower responses as the number of prior bDMARDs increased (Table 2). Responses at Wk 24 were generally consistent with those at Wk 12 (data not shown). TEAEs across the subgroups were consistent with the overall study population (data not shown). Conclusion At Wk 12, treatment with UPA at either 15 or 30 mg QD led to significantly better clinical responses vs PBO in this treatment-refractory population, including in pts with LoE to an anti-TNF or an anti-IL-6, and those who had IR/intolerance to 1, 2 or ≥3 prior bDMARDs, with consistent safety profiles as to the overall study population. Acknowledgement AbbVie, Inc was the study sponsor, contributed to study design, data collection, analysis & interpretation, and to writing, reviewing, and approval of final version. Medical writing support was provided by Naina Barretto, PhD, of AbbVie, Inc. Disclosure of Interests Michael Weinblatt Shareholder of: Lycera, Scipher, Vorso, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, Sanofi/Regeneron, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Crescendo Bioscience, Gilead, GSK, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, SetPoint, BMS, Corrona, Eli Lilly and Company, Glen Thomson Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant for: Amgen, Kun Chen Shareholder of: Abbvie, Employee of: Abbvie, Sebastian Meerwein Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Casey Schlacher Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, John Cush Consultant for: AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Genentech; AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, BMS, Amgen, Genentech, Celgene, Lilly, and Horizon

Background RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is an extra-articular manifestation of RA and is one of the leading causes of death in patients (pts) with RA.1 Previous studies have indicated that clinical factors such as age, sex, smoking and autoantibody positivity are strongly associated with RA-ILD.2 There is also evidence of active RA being related to increased risk for clinically apparent ILD.3 However, there are limited data on how pts with RA-ILD are managed for their joint conditions and joint outcomes. Objectives To evaluate RA treatment patterns in pts with subclinical and clinical RA-ILD compared with pts with RA without ILD, and to assess joint disease activity at baseline and change in disease activity by treatment in all cohorts. Methods Data from adult pts with RA enrolled in a longitudinal sequential RA registry were analysed. Pts in the registry were evaluated annually by a rheumatologist for disease activity and treatment, and semi-annually on multiple clinical patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and resource utilisation parameters. Pts with chest computed tomography (CT) scans performed to evaluate clinical indications for ILD and with blood samples were included in this analysis. Pts with chest CT scans that were indeterminate for ILD were excluded from the study. Pts were then divided into two mutually exclusive groups: non-ILD RA pts and RA-ILD pts. RA-ILD pts were further divided into subclinical and clinically evident ILD. Date of chest CT scan was considered the index date. The two cohorts were compared using descriptive statistics to summarise baseline differences in demographics, disease activity measures, serostatus and treatments. Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables were performed, with two-sided significance level of 0.05. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate change from baseline to 12 months in joint disease activity for pts with available data at baseline and follow-up. Results 75 pts with chest CT scans were included in the analysis. Of these, 38.7% (n=29) were non-ILD RA and 61.3% (n=46) had some manifestation of RA-ILD. Of the RA-ILD cohort, 63.0% (n=29) and 37.0% (n=17) were classified as subclinical and clinically evident RA-ILD, respectively. At the time of chest CT scan, RA-ILD (vs non-ILD RA) pts were older with longer disease duration, a greater proportion were male and had higher anti-citrullinated protein antibody and RF titres (Table 1). In terms of RA treatments, a significantly greater proportion of RA-ILD (vs non-ILD RA) pts were on corticosteroids (CS; 47.8% vs 20.7%) and a significantly greater proportion of clinically evident RA-ILD (vs non-ILD RA) were on non-TNF inhibitor (TNFi) biologics. RA-ILD (vs non-ILD RA) pts had numerically higher joint disease activity and modified HAQ score at baseline (Table 1). However, the change in joint disease activity and PROs in RA-ILD pts was numerically greater vs non-ILD RA pts. In a multivariable analysis, RA-ILD status did not impact change in joint disease activity, but baseline joint disease activity was significantly associated with reduction in joint disease activity at 12 months (Table 2). Conclusion RA-ILD pts compared with non-ILD RA pts in clinical practice are more likely to be managed with CS therapy and non-TNFi bDMARDs. The improvement in joint disease activity was similar between RA-ILD and non-ILD RA pts. The analysis was limited by small sample size; further studies with larger pt numbers are required to confirm the findings. References [1] Doyle JT, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2015;191:1403–12. [2] Sparks JA, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2016;68:753–62. [3] Sparks JA, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol2018; 70(suppl 10):abstract 884. Disclosure of Interests Evo Alemao Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Tracy Doyle Grant/research support from: Receive research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and I’m involved in a clinical trial funded by Genentech., Jeffrey Sparks Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Consultant for: Optum, Aarti Rao Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yogesh Saini Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Christine Iannaccone: None declared, Michael E. Weinblatt Shareholder of: Stock option: CanFite, Lycera, Scipher, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Crescendo Bioscience, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CanFite, Corrona, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Horizon, Lilly, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Scipher, Set Point, Nancy Shadick Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi/Regeneron, Crescendo Biosciences, Mallinckrodt, Amgen, Consultant for: Consulting work for Bristol-Myers Squibb for under $10,000.

Background: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD) are at increased risk of developing Herpes Zoster (HZ) due to the diseases/or medications used to treat them such as corticosteroids methotrexate, biologic disease modifying agents, and JAK inhibitors. Released in 2018, the Zoster Recombinant Adjuvanted (ZRA) is a new vaccine with >90% efficacy and can be used in patients taking immunosuppressive therapy as compared to the live Zoster vaccine1. There has been a concern about whether the potency of the adjuvant could trigger flares of the underlying SRD, and whether there will be more side effects in this population. Objectives: Our goal was to study the impact of the new ZRA vaccine in RA and other SRD patients and to measure the risk of flare and incidence of side effects. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review from 2/1/2018 to 1/20/2019, on patients with RA and SRD seen at the BWH who had received the ZRA vaccine. Co-variates of interest were collected. A flare was defined as occurring within 12 weeks of the vaccine administration by either: 1) documentation of RA flare in the rheumatologist office notes, telephone encounter or patient portal communication, or 2) new prednisone prescription or an increase in dose of existing prednisone prescription. Vaccine side effects were defined as muscle soreness at the injection site, redness, mild swelling, fatigue, fevers, myalgias, headaches, nausea, and abdominal pain. Results: 300 patients who received the new ZRA vaccine between 2/1/2018 to 1/20/2019 were identified. Mean follow up was 12.5 weeks ranging from 1-40 weeks following administration. Patient characteristics are identified in Table 1. We identified a 3.00% (n=9) incidence of flare following the first dose and 2.86% (n=4) incidence following the second dose. One patient flared after both the first and second dose. All the flares were mild, self-limited, responded to treatment with low dose glucocorticoids, and did not warrant a change in immunosuppressive therapy. 15.3% (n=46) patients experienced side effects such as soreness at the injection site, fever, stomach ache, and flu like symptoms. Of the patients who experienced side effects, 15.4% (n=40) occurred after the first dose and 8.59% (n=11) occurred following the second dose. Five patients experienced side effects from both. All side effects were regarded as mild and did not necessitate an emergency room visit. No cases of Zoster were reported. Conclusion: In our experience with 300 patients who received the new ZRA (207 RA and 93 SRD) in 2018-2019, the incidence of disease flares was ≤ 3% and of side effects was 15% which is reassuring. Both flares and side effects were mild, self-limited, and did not require a change in DMARD therapy. No cases of Zoster were reported. Larger formal studies with longer term follow up are required to confirm our findings. Reference: [1] Shingrix Recommendations.cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/shingles/hcp/shingrix/recommendations.html Disclosure of Interests: Emma Stevens: None declared, Michael E. Weinblatt Shareholder of: Stock option: CanFite, Lycera, Scipher, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Crescendo Bioscience, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CanFite, Corrona, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Horizon, Lilly, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Scipher, Set Point, Elena Massarotti : None declared, Frances Griffin: None declared, Sonali Desai : None declared

Background In RA-BEAM phase 3 study, baricitinib (bari) 4mg demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Bari, a selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe active RA in adults in >50 countries. For improved treatment strategy, it is important to understand whether the pt population is composed of distinct pt groups with differing treatment responses and associated baseline characteristics. Objectives To identify different treatment trajectories, based on CDAI improvement, in bari 4mg treated pts over 52 weeks; and examine the associated clinical disease measures, structural damage score and baseline characteristics. Methods Growth Mixed Model (GMM), a novel latent class mixed model, was used to classify the longitudinal disease patterns instead of predefining a clinical responder at a specific time point. GMM was applied to observed CDAI values for bari 4mg pts, continuously treated from 0-52 weeks or up to rescue, to cluster pts into subgroups based on their trajectory patterns. Following identification of the groups, baseline pt characteristics and disease measures were compared between groups. Results Bari 4mg treated pts (N=487) were classified into 3 groups based on their CDAI trajectory patterns: Group 1 (n=344, 71%), Group 2 (n=56, 11%), and Group 3 (n=87, 18%) (Figure). Group 1 had lower baseline CDAI (34, Table 1), achieved CDAI≤10 (low disease activity, LDA) rapidly and maintained LDA up to 52 weeks. Group 2 had higher CDAI at baseline (48, Table 1), responded quickly, and although pts took longer to attain LDA, they continued to show CDAI improvement. Group 3 had similar baseline CDAI values (48, Table 1) to Group 2 but higher baseline damage (mean total Sharp score [mTSS] of 50, versus 41 for Groups 1 and 2, Table 1). Most Group 3 pts did not achieve LDA but continued to show improvement over time. The majority of pts had no radiographic progression with the highest proportion in Group 1 (Table 2). The trajectories of average pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI), tender joint count 28, and swollen joint count 28 were consistent in the 3 groups. W=week Conclusion Baseline severity is associated with different treatment trajectories. With bari treatment, majority of pts achieved LDA and had no structural progression. Pts with high baseline disease activity were associated with longer time to achieve LDA. Pts with higher baseline structural damage in addition to high disease activity were less likely to achieve LDA, but consistent with the other groups, had similar low rate of joint damage progression. Long-term maintenance and continued improvement in CDAI were observed with bari treatment. Disclosure of Interests Peter C. Taylor Grant/research support from: Celgene, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, UCB, Consultant for: AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc, Paul Emery Grant/research support from: Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Consultant for: Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB, Roche, Novartis, Gilead,Samsung, Sandoz and Lilly, Michael E. Weinblatt Shareholder of: Stock option: CanFite, Lycera, Scipher, Inmedix, Grant/research support from: Crescendo Bioscience, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Consultant for: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CanFite, Corrona, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Horizon, Lilly, Lycera, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Scipher, Set Point, Eduardo Mysler Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, Janssen, Medimmune, Pfizer Inc, and Roche, Consultant for: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, Janssen, Medimmune, Pfizer Inc, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, Janssen, Medimmune, Pfizer Inc, and Roche, Andrea Rubbert-Roth Consultant for: Chugai, Eli Lilly, Roche, and Sanofi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Hexal/Novartis, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Bochao Jia Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Luna Sun Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Yushi Liu Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Yun-Fei Chen Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Anabela Cardoso Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, MSD, Ono, Taisho-Toyama, Takeda, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Glaxo-Smithkline, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer Japan Inc, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, YL Biologics

We investigated whether rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related autoantibodies were associated with abnormalities on pulmonary function tests (PFTs).We studied RA serostatus and PFT abnormalities within a RA registry. RA serostatus was assessed by research assays for cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF). Outcomes were abnormalities on clinically indicated PFTs, including restriction, obstruction, and diffusion abnormality. Logistic regression was used to obtain ORs and 95% CIs for the PFT abnormalities by RA serologic phenotypes independent of lifestyle and RA characteristics.Among 1272 analyzed subjects, mean age was 56.3 years (SD 14.1), 82.2% were female, and 69.5% were seropositive. There were 100 subjects with abnormal PFTs. Compared with seronegativity, seropositivity was associated with increased odds of any PFT abnormality (multivariable OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.30-4.03). When analyzing type of PFT abnormality, seropositivity was also associated with restriction, obstruction, and diffusion abnormalities; multivariable ORs were 2.48 (95% CI 1.26-4.87), 3.12 (95% CI 1.28-7.61), and 2.30 (95% CI 1.09-4.83), respectively. When analyzing by CCP and RF status, the associations were stronger for RF+ than for CCP+ (any PFT abnormality OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.27 for RF+ vs. RF-; OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.03-2.69 for CCP+ vs. CCP-) with a dose effect of higher RF titer increasing odds for each PFT abnormality (p for trend 0.05).Seropositive RA patients had two-fold increased risk for abnormalities on PFTs performed for clinical indications compared with seronegative RA. Patients with seropositive RA, particularly those with high-titer RF positivity, may be more likely to have obstructive and restrictive abnormalities, independent of smoking.Key points• Due to the known excess pulmonary morbidity/mortality in RA, we studied the relationship of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related autoantibodies with pulmonary function test (PFT) abnormalities using a large RA registry.• We evaluated whether presence and levels of cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) were associated with restriction, obstruction, and diffusion abnormalities on PFTs among 1272 subjects with RA.• Seropositivity was associated with two-fold increased risk for any PFT abnormality, independent of confounders including smoking. Higher titers of RF conferred greatest risk for all PFT outcomes: obstruction, restriction, and diffusion abnormality.• These results provide evidence that patients with RA should be closely monitored for pulmonary involvement, particularly those with high-titer RF seropositivity.