Search

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can provide downstaging and improve margin negativity for borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma [(B)RPC]. Little is known about the relative efficacy of capecitabine (CAPE)-based vs. gemcitabine (GEM)-based 3-week chemoradiation (3WCRT) with 36 Gy in 15 fractions. This study aimed to compare the odds of achieving surgical resection, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 3WCRT with concurrent CAPE versus GEM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining medical records from a single center for patients with (B)RPC treated with 3WCRT between 1/2009–12/2020. Odd ratios (OR) of achieving surgical resection were estimated using logistic regression for univariable and multivariable analyses. Median TTP (mTTP) and median OS (mOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of progression and survival in univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (71%) patients were treated with CAPE, while 9 (29%) were treated with GEM. All patients in the GEM group were borderline resectable, vs. 18 (82%) patients in the CAPE group, P=0.30. Nineteen (86%) patients in the CAPE group were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, vs. 4 (44%) patients in the GEM group, P=0.03. The CAPE group had higher odds of achieving surgical resection [OR =9.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50–58.20]. Adjusting for covariates, the odds of achieving surgical resection were still statistically higher in the CAPE group vs. the GEM group (OR =25.34; 95% CI: 1.14–563.72). The CAPE group had superior mTTP compared to the GEM group (15.4 months, 95% CI: 4.9–71.1 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI: 0.4–14.5; P=0.01), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14–0.81). Adjusting for covariates this effect persisted; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for progression was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08–0.77). Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated that the CAPE group had superior OS compared to the GEM group in unadjusted (HR =0.13; 95% CI: 0.04–0.40) and adjusted models (HR =0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.52). CONCLUSIONS: For neoadjuvant 3WCRT, this hypothesis-generating study suggests concurrent CAPE may be a more effective radiosensitizer than GEM for patients with (B)RPC.

BACKGROUND Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is typically treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1 (ERCC1) is a protein involved in DNA damage repair. The objective of this study was to assess whether higher tumoral ERCC1 expression would associate with worse clinical outcomes in NSCLC treated with CRT. METHODS Twenty-five patients were included. Relative expression levels of messenger RNA (mRNA) for ERCC1 were measured with a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and expressed as scaled ERCC1 mRNA gene expression value. Patients were followed every 3 months with history, physical exam, and imaging to assess clinical outcomes. We evaluated the associations between ERCC1, as well as other prognostic variables including stage, age, gender, race, histology, RT dose, performance status, and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS Recursive partitioning analysis identified a GeneExp cutoff of 1.54. Higher ERCC1 expression was associated with worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.70, P=0.04] and trended towards worse OS (HR =1.53, P=0.11). Increasing tumor volume (HR =1.001, P=0.055), squamous cell (HR =7.86, P=0.008) and poorly differentiated histology (HR =5.25, P=0.06) also associated with worse OS. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence at 1 year trended higher with ERCC1 GeneExp ≥1.54 (78.1%) compared to ERCC1 GeneExp

Background Increased risk of a second primary malignancy (SPM) before or after diagnosis of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has been reported in a previous single‐institution study. We hypothesize that patients diagnosed with ASCC are at increased risk for developing SPMs before or after the diagnosis of ASCC. The primary objective of this study was to identify the diagnoses of cancer most likely to occur as SPMs before or after ASCC. Methods This work employs the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registry data to conduct a US‐population‐based study of patients diagnosed with ASCC between 1975 and 2016. In patients diagnosed with ASCC, we evaluated the risk of SPMs and the risk of developing ASCC as an SPM after another cancer using standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for all SPMs by calculating the ratio of observed events in the ASCC cohort compared to expected (O/E) events in a matched reference cohort of the general population. Results A total of 7,594 patients with primary ASCC were included. Patients with ASCC were at increased risk of the diagnosis of an SPM (SIR = 1.45), particularly cancers of the lung, vulva, oropharynx, or colon. Patients with ASCC had an increased rate of previous malignancy (SIR = 1.23), especially Kaposi sarcoma or vulvar cancer. Overall elevated incidence of SPMs was unrelated to prior radiation treatment. Radiation treatment was associated with increased risk for SPMs in the female genital system but appeared protective against prostate cancer as SPMs. Conclusions Our findings support increased surveillance and screening for second malignancies in patients with these diagnoses, as patients with ASCC are often either survivors of a prior cancer diagnosis or are at increased risk of developing later malignancies., Survivors of anal squamous cell carcinoma are at increased risk for particular second malignancies and should be screened for these. Risk of second malignancies is sometimes related to radiation therapy, but radiation can also be protective against second cancers in some cases.

Background Programmed death protein (ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitors have provided new therapeutic options for advanced lung cancer. However, patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have been traditionally excluded from most registered trials of this form of treatment. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with HBV and advanced lung cancer who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy from September 2018 to May 2020 in our department. Treatment-related hepatotoxicity was evaluated and recorded. Overall response rate and progression free survival were also assessed in the patients using iRECIST. Results Seventeen patients were evaluated in this analysis. Of these, six (35.3%) experienced hepatic transaminase elevation during immunotherapy. Three of these patients developed Grade 3 hepatic immune-related adverse events and received systemic corticosteroids, following which aminotransferase levels recovered to normal in all patients and no adverse events were observed in subsequent treatment. No patient experienced HBV reactivation or flare. One patient developed active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Other adverse events were mild, well tolerated and short term. The objective response rate (ORR) of the cohort was 62.5%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months. Conclusions Lung cancer patients can be treated safely with anti-PD-1 inhibitors in the context of HBV infection. Close monitoring for hepatotoxicity and prophylactic antiviral therapy is advised. Further studies on the use of anti-PD-1 inhibitors in HBV-infected patients are needed.

Highlights • Complete resection is a potentially curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. • This report studies neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation. • The addition of radiation was associated with improved complete resection rates. • The addition of radiation was associated with improved pathologic down staging., Purpose Margin-negative (R0) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pre-operative multi-agent chemotherapy alone (MAC) or MAC followed by pre-operative radiotherapy (MAC + RT) may be used to improve resectability and potentially survival. However, the optimal pre-operative regimen is unknown. Methods Patients with non-metastatic PDAC from 2006 to 2016 who received pre-operative MAC or MAC + RT before oncologic resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) associates with R0 resection were identified with logistic regression, and survival was analyzed secondarily with the Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results 4,599 patients were identified (MAC: 3,109, MAC + RT: 1,490). Compared to those receiving MAC, patients receiving MAC + RT were more likely to have cT3-4 disease (76% vs 64%, p

Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for T1/T2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. We compared positive margin rates in patients with clinical T1&T2 tumors who did and did not receive NAT. Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) found clinical T1&T2 PDAC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2004 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate regression determined factors associated with a positive margin and survival. Results 9795 patients underwent surgery for clinical T1 or T2 pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. 8472 patients had data regarding use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies; of which, 774 (9.1%) received NAT and 435 (5.1%) received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. NAT was found to lower positive margin rates from 21.8 to 15.5% (p, Highlights • Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreas cancer is controversial • Neoadjuvant therapy can improve margin positivity • Margin positivity is associated with inferior survival • Even small, resectable pancreas cancers may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy

Cemiplimab; Càncer de coll uterí metastàtic; Càncer de coll uterí recurrent Cemiplimab; Cáncer de cuello uterino metastásico; Cáncer de cuello uterino recurrente Cemiplimab; Metastatic cervical cancer; Recurrent cervical cancer Objectives To characterize the safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of cemiplimab as monotherapy or in combination with hypofractionated radiation therapy (hfRT) in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. To determine the association between histology and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods In non-randomized phase I expansion cohorts, patients (squamous or non-squamous histology) received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, either alone (monotherapy cohort) or with hfRT during week 2 (combination cohort). Due to insufficient tissue material, PD-L1 protein expression was evaluated in commercially purchased samples and mRNA expression levels were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results Twenty patients enrolled in both cohorts in total; 10 had squamous histology. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and hypokalemia, occurring in 35%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Objective response rate was 10% in each cohort; responders had squamous histology. Duration of response was 11.2 months and 6.4 months for the responder in the monotherapy and combination cohort, respectively. Irradiated lesions were not included in the response assessments. In separate archived specimens ( N = 155), PD-L1 protein expression in tumor and immune cells was negative (

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide but with an approximate 5-year survival of greater than 50% in patients after surgical resection. Survival estimates have limited utility for patients who have survived several years after initial treatment. We analyzed how conditional survival (CS) after curative-intent surgery for HCC predicts survival estimates over time. METHODS: NCDB(2004–2014) was queried for patients undergoing definitive surgical resection for HCC. Cumulative overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and conditional survival (CS) at x years after diagnosis was calculated as CS(1) = OS ((X+5)) / OS ((X)). RESULTS: Final analysis encompassed 11,357 patients. Age, negative margin status, grade severity and radiation prior to surgery were statistically significant predictors of cumulative overall conditional survival (p≤0.0001). Overall unconditional 5-year survival was 65.7%, but CS estimates were higher. A patient who has already survived 3 years has an additional 2-year, or 5-year CS, estimate of 86.96%. CONCLUSION: Survival estimates following hepatic resection in HCC patients change according to survival time accrued since surgery. CS estimates are improved relative to unconditional OS. The impact of different variables influencing OS is likewise non-linear over the course of time after surgery.

Summary Background Data on patients with COVID-19 who have cancer are lacking. Here we characterise the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors for mortality and severe illness. Methods In this cohort study, we collected de-identified data on patients with active or previous malignancy, aged 18 years and older, with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the USA, Canada, and Spain from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) database for whom baseline data were added between March 17 and April 16, 2020. We collected data on baseline clinical conditions, medications, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 disease course. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed the association between the outcome and potential prognostic variables using logistic regression analyses, partially adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and obesity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701, and is ongoing. Findings Of 1035 records entered into the CCC19 database during the study period, 928 patients met inclusion criteria for our analysis. Median age was 66 years (IQR 57–76), 279 (30%) were aged 75 years or older, and 468 (50%) patients were male. The most prevalent malignancies were breast (191 [21%]) and prostate (152 [16%]). 366 (39%) patients were on active anticancer treatment, and 396 (43%) had active (measurable) cancer. At analysis (May 7, 2020), 121 (13%) patients had died. In logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality, after partial adjustment, were: increased age (per 10 years; partially adjusted odds ratio 1·84, 95% CI 1·53–2·21), male sex (1·63, 1·07–2·48), smoking status (former smoker vs never smoked: 1·60, 1·03–2·47), number of comorbidities (two vs none: 4·50, 1·33–15·28), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (status of 2 vs 0 or 1: 3·89, 2·11–7·18), active cancer (progressing vs remission: 5·20, 2·77–9·77), and receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (vs treatment with neither: 2·93, 1·79–4·79; confounding by indication cannot be excluded). Compared with residence in the US-Northeast, residence in Canada (0·24, 0·07–0·84) or the US-Midwest (0·50, 0·28–0·90) were associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality. Race and ethnicity, obesity status, cancer type, type of anticancer therapy, and recent surgery were not associated with mortality. Interpretation Among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated with general risk factors and risk factors unique to patients with cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments. Funding American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research.

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 86% of all lung cancers (1). Lung cancer survivors are a growing yet understudied patient population. Even with the high mortality associated with lung cancer, the number of lung cancer patients added to the survivor population every year is significantly high due to high lung cancer incidence rates (224,210 new cases diagnosed annually) (1).

Purpose We examined long-term clinical outcomes among patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated at our institution with definitive thoracic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and local therapy to all oligometastatic lesions. Methods and Materials A retrospective review identified 38 patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC (≤3 metastatic lesions) who were treated with definitive CRT to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes between 1999 and 2017 at our institution. Of the 38 patients, 27 patients (71%) received induction chemotherapy, all of whom responded or stabilized with initial systemic therapy before consideration of CRT. Most patients received chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy (n = 32; 84%) and local therapy to the metastatic disease site(s) (n = 34; 89%). We assessed patterns of progression or failure, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicities. Results The median follow-up duration was 54.9 months. Most patients (84%) presented with N2 to N3 disease. The brain or central nervous system was the most common site of disease progression and occurred in 16 of 28 patients (57%) experiencing any progression and 10 of 16 patients (63%) who initially presented with brain oligometastases. Median OS was 21.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6-49.0 months), and median PFS 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.2-14.4 months). The 1-, 2-, and 4-year OS rates were 75.7%, 45.0%, and 33.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, both locoregional progression (hazard ratio: 5.8; 95% CI, 2.2-15.0; P = .0003) and distant progression (hazard ratio: 6.0; 95% CI, 2.3-15.4; P = .0002), when treated as time-dependent covariates, were associated with inferior OS. Grade ≥3 esophagitis occurred in 9% and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in 5% of patients with evaluable data. Conclusions Patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC and a high regional nodal burden treated with definitive thoracic CRT experienced favorable survival outcomes and low toxicity. At our institution, treating oligometastatic disease with CRT after systemic therapy is incorporated into the treatment plan from the onset of therapy, and we monitor the neuraxis closely for progression during and after treatment. Future research should focus on novel treatment combinations, such as immunotherapy or targeted systemic therapy as appropriate to further improve tumor control and survival.

Background: Hematologic toxicity (HT) commonly occurs during chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer. We sought to determine radiation doses that correlate with declines in blood counts due to vertebral body (VB) irradiation during CRT. Methods: We analyzed 53 esophageal cancer patients who were treated with weekly neoadjuvant carboplatin, paclitaxel and RT with weekly complete blood counts (CBC) available during treatment. HTs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). Dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters of Vx, defined as percentage of entire bony vertebra (body, pedicles, laminae, processes) receiving at least x Gy of radiation, were collected for VB V 5 (VBV 5 ), VBV 10 –VBV 60 in increments of 10, and mean vertebral dose (MVD). Linear and logistic regressions were performed to identify associations between leukopenia nadirs and DVH parameters. Receiver operator curves identified thresholds to avoid grade ≥3 leukopenia. Results: A proportion of 32.1% of patients (n=17) developed grade 3 leukopenia and 5.7% (n=3) developed grade 4 leukopenia. VBV 5 , VBV 10 , VBV 20 , VBV 30 , and MVD were significantly associated with worsening leukopenia on univariate and multivariate analysis. Associations with leukopenia were not seen with VBV 40 and VBV 50 DVH values. Thresholds to avoid grade ≥3 leukopenia were VBV 10

BACKGROUND: Our study investigates treatment profiles in octogenarian patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and assesses each treatment’s role in a stage-specific manner. METHODS: Patient data from individuals with SCLC aged 80 years and older between 1988 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database were extracted. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with no treatment and different treatment groups were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method, with stratifications by stage. Cox Proportional Hazard model further identified independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 7,290 patients were included in this study. Notably, 3,358 (46.1%) patients did not receive active treatment. Compared with the no active treatment group, the CSS of patients who received treatment was significantly improved (median 6 vs. 0 months, P

IMPORTANCE: Administration of pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) may provide treatment benefit to patients with locally advanced, stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment outcomes and safety of pembrolizumab plus cCRT in stage III NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The phase 2, nonrandomized, 2-cohort, open-label KEYNOTE-799 study enrolled patients between November 5, 2018, and July 31, 2020, from 52 academic facilities and community-based institutions across 10 countries. As of October 28, 2020, median (range) follow-up was 18.5 (13.6-23.8) months in cohort A and 13.7 (2.9-23.5) months in cohort B. Of 301 patients screened, 216 eligible patients with previously untreated, unresectable, and pathologically/radiologically confirmed stage IIIA/IIIB/IIIC NSCLC with measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in cohort A (squamous/nonsquamous) received 1 cycle (3 weeks) of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6 mg/mL/min), paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)), and pembrolizumab (200 mg), followed by carboplatin (AUC 2 mg/mL/min) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)) once weekly for 6 weeks and 2 cycles of pembrolizumab plus standard thoracic radiotherapy. Patients in cohort B (nonsquamous) received 3 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)), pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)), and pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks and thoracic radiotherapy in cycles 2 and 3. Patients received 14 additional cycles of pembrolizumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points were objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and incidence of grade 3 to 5 pneumonitis. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients received treatment in cohort A (76 men [67.9%]; median [range] age, 66.0 [46-90] years; 66 patients [58.9%] with programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-L1] tumor proportion score ≥1%) and 102 patients received treatment in cohort B (62 men [60.8%]; median [range] age, 64.0 [35-81] years; 40 patients [39.2%] with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1%). Objective response rate was 70.5% (79 of 112; 95% CI, 61.2%-78.8%) in cohort A and 70.6% (72 of 102; 95% CI, 60.7%-79.2%) in cohort B. Median duration of response was not reached, but 79.7% and 75.6%, respectively, had response duration of 12 months or longer. Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis occurred in 9 of 112 patients (8.0%) in cohort A and 7 of 102 (6.9%) in cohort B. Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 72 of 112 (64.3%) and 51 of 102 (50.0%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this phase 2, nonrandomized, 2-cohort study suggest promising antitumor activity of pembrolizumab plus cCRT and manageable safety in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC.

Purpose/Objective(s) Treatment with concurrent chemoradiation and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or stage III/IV non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with improved PFS and OS. However, treatment is limited by the development of pneumonitis and esophagitis, toxicities associated with both chemoradiation and ICIs. Materials/Methods We conducted a single center retrospective review of pts with locally advanced or stage III/IV NSCLC who received chemoradiation with concurrent or subsequent ICI. Pts were excluded if the relevant structure contours were missing or if the tumor location was not matched by both groups. Pneumonitis and esophagitis were assessed with CTACE V5. Results From 2015-2020, 49 pts were identified and 25 were included in the analysis. One patient was excluded due absent contours. Ten pts were adapted and 15 were non-adaptive controls. Mean age at onset was 728 years, 12F, 13 M; 13 adenocarcinoma, 9 squamous, 3 poorly differentiated; mean BMI 28.3 6.1, 1 IIB, 9 IIIA, 15 IIIB; 4 T1, 6 T2, 9 T3, 6 T4; 1 LLL, 8 LUL, 4 RLL, 12 RUL. Twenty and 77.7% of pts in the adaptive group had pneumonitis and esophagitis respectively, while 20% and 80% in the non-adapted group had pneumonitis and esophagitis respectively. Due to the number of DVH parameters sampled, bivariate analysis was performed; values with P Conclusion Both the adaptive and non-adaptive groups had statistically equivalent toxicities; however, GTV volumes between the 2 groups were significantly different in size. By using adaptive therapy techniques, pts with large tumor sizes can be treated with an equivalent level of toxicity to patients with smaller tumors treated with traditionally.

Purpose/Objective(s) Pembrolizumab, an anti‒PD-1 antibody is standard of care therapy for metastatic non‒small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy. Durvalumab, an anti–PD-L1 antibody, is approved for unresectable, stage III NSCLC without disease progression following CCRT. Early trials of pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy, either concurrently or as consolidation, showed acceptable tolerability and promising PFS in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Early data suggest the combination of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) plus anti–PD-(L)1 inhibition can enhance treatment effects. KEYLYNK-012 (NCT04380636) is evaluating pembrolizumab plus CCRT followed by pembrolizumab with/without the PARP inhibitor olaparib vs CCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC. Materials/Methods This global phase 3, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind study is enrolling patients aged ≥18 y with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, stage IIIA–C NSCLC, an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and a tumor sample available for PD-L1 evaluation. Patients are randomized 1:1:1 to CCRT (platinum-doublet chemotherapy [cisplatin plus pemetrexed or etoposide; or carboplatin plus paclitaxel] plus radiotherapy 60 Gy over 6 wks [cycles 2–3]) with pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W (groups A and B) or CCRT alone (group C) for 3 cycles. This is followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 17 cycles plus placebo (group A) or olaparib 300 mg BID (group B); or durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W for 26 cycles (group C). Randomization is stratified by disease stage (IIIA vs IIIB/IIIC), tumor histology (squamous vs nonsquamous), PD-L1 tumor proportion score (≥50% vs Results forthcoming Conclusion forthcoming

Purpose/objective(s) Clinical outcomes for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remain suboptimal. Standard of care chemoradiation with platinum/etoposide and thoracic radiation to 45 Gy delivered twice daily followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation yields a median overall survival of 30 months. LU005 is a randomized phase II/III trial designed to test the addition of atezolizumab to concurrent chemoradiation. Materials/methods Patients with LS-SCLC (Tx-T4, N0-N3, M0) are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either standard chemoradiation, consisting of thoracic radiation (45 Gy twice daily or 66 Gy daily) with concurrent platinum/etoposide chemotherapy, or the experimental arm, consisting of the same chemoradiation regimen plus the addition of atezolizumab delivered concurrently with thoracic radiation, every 3 weeks for 12 months duration. Thoracic radiation begins with the second cycle of chemotherapy in both treatment arms. Stratification variables include radiation schedule (once daily vs. twice daily), chemotherapy (cisplatin vs. carboplatin), gender, and performance status (PS 0/1 vs. 2). Prophylactic cranial radiation is recommended for patients who have a response to treatment. The phase II primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) and the phase III primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The overall sample size for phase II/III will be 506. Secondary endpoints include objective response rates, local control, distant metastases free, and quality of life. Correlative studies will include blood and tissue based tumor mutational burden analysis, with the hypothesis that higher mutational burden will predict for improved PFS in the experimental arm. Results As of 3/01/2021, 374 sites are approved to enroll patients. Two-hundred patients have been accrued. Current enrollment is ahead of projected accrual. Conclusion LU005 is a randomized II/III trial testing the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemoradiation for LS-SCLC. Accrual remains robust in spite of the ongoing COVID 19 pandemic. Funding This project was supported by grants U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), U24CA180803 (IROC) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Genentech.

Purpose/Objective(s) Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical modality for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Little is known about how the etiology of HCC impacts overall and progression free survival (OS and PFS) in patients treated with definitive RT. We hypothesize that patients treated with definitive RT for HCC secondary to hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses (viral group) would have favorable OS and PFS when compared to patients with HCC secondary to other etiologies (non-viral group). Materials/Methods Medical records were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution for patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC and treated with definitive RT between 1/2011 and 12/2020. Patients treated with prior surgery or radiofrequency ablation were excluded. Progress notes were reviewed to determine date of last follow-up, progression, and death. Notes were also assessed to determine the etiology of HCC, age at diagnosis, Child-Pugh classification (CPC), AJCC 8th edition T stage, RT strategy, and planning target volume (PTV). Descriptive statistics were quantified for baseline characteristics. Survival curves were estimated via Kaplan-Meier method; statistical difference was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) when controlling for confounding factors. Results Forty-six patients were included in the analysis. 30 (65%) patients were in the viral group, while 16 (35%) patients were in the non-viral group. Median ages at diagnosis for the viral and non-viral groups were 64 (interquartile range (IQR): 60 to 69) and 71 years (IQR: 66.5 to 76.5), respectively (P = 0.014). Treatment with hypofractionated RT (P = 0.559), proton therapy (P = 0.686), performance status (P = 0.222), CPC (P = 0.270), T stage (P = 0.639), and PTV (P = 0.472) were not different between groups. There was a trend toward improved Median OS for the viral group compared to the non-viral group: 17.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.7 to not-reached (NR)) vs. 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.1 to NR) (P = 0.072). Similarly, PFS was not different between viral and non-viral groups: 9.3 (95% CI: 7.4 to 19.0) vs. 8.0 (95% CI: 4.0 to 10.3), P = 0.314. However, after controlling for confounding factors with MVA Cox proportional hazards models, the viral group had superior OS (HR = 4.20, 95% CI: 1.47 to 12.02, P = 0.008); the viral group also had superior PFS (HR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.81, P = 0.037). Conclusion Our retrospective review of patients with unresectable HCC treated with definitive RT provides evidence that viral etiologies of HCC may fare better in OS and PFS when compared to non-viral etiologies. The etiology of HCC development for virally vs non-virally mediated tumors may have implications for treatment and response in the setting of radiation therapy.

Purpose/Objective(s) KEYNOTE-799 (NCT03631784), a phase 2 study of the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (pembro) plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) in patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced stage III NSCLC, completed accrual and follow up is ongoing. Results in a subset of pts from this study showed an ORR of 69.6% in cohort A (squamous [sq]/nonsquamous [nonsq], n = 112) and 70.5% in cohort B (nonsq, n = 61), and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in 8.0% and 7.9% of pts, respectively. We assessed safety and efficacy of pembro + cCRT in all pts from KEYNOTE-799. Materials/Methods This nonrandomized, multisite, open-label trial enrolled pts aged ≥18 y with previously untreated, unresectable, pathologically confirmed, stage IIIA‒C NSCLC with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pts in cohort A (sq and nonsq) received 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and pembro 200 mg. After 3 weeks, pts received carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 QW for 6 weeks and 2 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W + standard thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; using a standardized 3D conformal radiotherapy technique on a linear accelerator operating at ≥6 MV beam energy for a total target dose of 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions of 2 Gy). Pts in cohort B (nonsq) received 3 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, and pembro 200 mg Q3W, and TRT in cycles 2 and 3. All pts received up to 14 additional cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W. Primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and incidence of grade ≥3 pneumonitis (per NCI CTCAE v4.0); assessed in all pts as-treated. Results Of 216 pts enrolled (cohort A, n = 112; cohort B, n = 104), 112 in cohort A and 102 in cohort B were treated. As of October 28, 2020, the median (range) time from first dose to database cutoff was 18.5 (13.6–23.8) months in cohort A and 13.7 (2.9–23.5) months in cohort B. ORR (95% CI) was 70.5% (61.2%‒78.8%) and 70.6% (60.7%‒79.2%), respectively. Median DOR, OS, and PFS were not reached in either cohort. Twelve-month OS and PFS rates were 81.3% and 67.1% in cohort A; and 87.0% and 71.6% in cohort B. Grade ≥3 pneumonitis occurred in 9 pts (8.0%) in cohort A and 7 (6.9%) in cohort B. Median (range) time to onset of any pneumonitis was 4.3 (1.4–10.4) months in cohort A, and 4.4 (0.1–12.3) months in cohort B. Grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs occurring in ≥10% pts were neutropenia (cohort A, 16.1%; cohort B, 9.8%) and anemia (10.7% and 4.9%). See Table for additional safety data. Conclusion Pembro + cCRT continues to demonstrate promising antitumor activity, and manageable toxicity in pts with previously untreated, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC with longer follow-up.

Purpose To determine the optimal threshold of examined lymph node (ELN) number from cervical lymph node dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Further to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node classification systems and to determine the most suitable scheme to predict survival. Methods A total of 20991 HNSCC patients were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were fitted using the LOWESS smoother. Structural breakpoints were determined by the Chow test. The R square, C-index, likelihood ratio, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to compare the prognostic abilities among AJCC N stage, number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) stages. Results A minimal threshold ELN number of fifteen had the discriminatory capacities for both stage migration and survival. LODDS stages had the highest R square value (0.208), C-index (0.736) and likelihood ratio (2467) and the smallest AIC value (65874). LODDS stages also showed prognostic value in estimating patients with AJCC N0 stage. A novel staging system was proposed and showed good prognostic performance when stratified by different primary sites. Conclusion Fifteen lymph nodes should be examined for HNSCC patients. LODDS stage allows better prognostic stratification, especially in N0 stage. The proposed staging system may serve as precise evaluation tools to estimate postoperative prognoses.

Purpose: Prospective human data are lacking regarding safety, efficacy, and immunologic impacts of different radiation doses administered with combined PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade. Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter phase II study randomly assigning patients with metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to repeated low-dose fractionated radiation (LDFRT) or hypofractionated radiation (HFRT) with PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition. The primary endpoint was response outside the radiation field. Correlative samples were analyzed using multiplex immunofluorescence (IF), IHC, RNA/T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), and Olink. Results: Eighteen patients were evaluable for response. Median lines of prior therapy were four (range, 1–7). Sixteen patients demonstrated toxicity potentially related to treatment (84%), and 8 patients had grade 3–4 toxicity (42%). Best response was stable disease in 1 patient with out-of-field tumor shrinkage. Median overall survival was 3.8 months (90% confidence interval, 2.3–5.7 months). Correlative IF and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed increased infiltration of CD8+ and CD8+/PD-1+/Ki-67+ T cells in the radiation field after HFRT. LDFRT increased foci of micronuclei/primary nuclear rupture in two subjects. CyTOF and RNA-seq demonstrated significant declines in multiple circulating immune populations, particularly in patients receiving HFRT. TCR sequencing revealed treatment-associated changes in T-cell repertoire in the tumor and peripheral blood. Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility and safety of adding LDFRT and HFRT to PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade. Although the best response of stable disease does not support the use of concurrent PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition with HFRT or LDFRT in this population, biomarkers provide support that both LDFRT and HFRT impact the local immune microenvironment and systemic immunogenicity that can help guide future studies.

Although the development of effective combined chemoradiation regimens for esophageal cancers has resulted in statistically significant survival benefits, the majority of patients treated with curative intent develop locoregional and/or distant relapse. Further improvements in disease control and survival will require the development of individualized therapy based on the knowledge of host and tumor genomics and potentially harnessing the host immune system. Although there are a number of gene targets that are amplified and proteins that are overexpressed in esophageal cancers, attempts to target several of these have not proven successful in unselected patients. Herein, we review our current state of knowledge regarding the molecular pathways implicated in esophageal carcinoma, and the available agents for targeting these pathways that may rationally be combined with standard chemoradiation, with the hope that this commentary will guide future efforts of novel combinations of therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With advances in radiation therapy (RT) techniques for rectal and anal cancers allowing for the modulation of critical normal tissues, there has been an increased emphasis on improving the quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the impact of RT on QOL and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to better inform providers about the challenges of survivorship. RECENT FINDINGS: Large systematic reviews, recent studies and long-term follow-up of pivotal clinical trials have shown that RT impacts QOL, particularly fecal continence and sexual function. Modern preoperative RT techniques allow for decreased dose to organs-at-risk will likely improve QOL. SUMMARY: RT, though critical in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer, has a profound impact on QOL for some patients. Recent studies have included PROs and validated QOL metrics to better inform providers and patients.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival outcomes in metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical evidence suggests that overexpression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX2) in tumors facilitates immune evasion through prostaglandin E2 production and that COX inhibition synergizes with ICIs to promote antitumor T-cell activation. This study investigates whether concurrent COX inhibitor (COXi) use during ICI treatment compared with ICI alone is associated with improved time-to-progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma and NSCLC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 90 metastatic melanoma and 37 metastatic NSCLC patients, treated with ICI between 2011 and 2019. Differences in TTP and OS by ICI+COXi versus ICI alone were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Interaction between ICI+COXi versus ICI alone and pretreatment neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was examined. Independent radiology review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 was performed.ResultsFor patients with melanoma, median TTP was significantly prolonged in ICI+COXi versus ICI alone (245 vs 100.5 days, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, ICI+COXi associated with increased TTP (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.66, p=0.001), adjusted for age, pretreatment NLR, and gender. For NSCLC patients, ICI+COXi also associated with increased TTP compared with ICI alone on multivariate analysis (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.97; p=0.042) adjusted for age. ORR at 6 months was significantly higher in patients who received ICI+COXi compared with ICI alone in both melanoma (58.6% vs 19.2%, p=0.0005) and NSCLC (73.7% vs 33.3%, p=0.036) cohorts. In the melanoma cohort, high pretreatment NLR (>5) associated with decreased TTP (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.64 to 6.3; p=0.0007); however, ICI+COXi significantly associated with increased TTP in high NLR (>5) patients (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.25), but not in low NLR (≤5) patients (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.32). Similar outcomes were found in an adjusted melanoma cohort after RECIST review.ConclusionsOur study suggests that COXi use concurrently with ICI significantly associated with longer TTP and improved ORR at 6 months in patients with metastatic melanoma and NSCLC compared with ICI alone. Furthermore, COXi use appears to reverse the negative prognostic effect of a high NLR by prolonging TTP in patients with melanoma.

Purpose: Although the association of marital status with outcomes for patients with cancer has been widely studied, the mechanisms underpinning the protective effect of marriage are still not fully understood. The social support that marriage imparts is often discussed as an explanation for why patients with cancer who are married have better outcomes. Social support has been difficult to objectively quantify. Accompaniment of the patient at physician visits may be more meaningful than marital status itself. This study investigated the effect of caregiver presence at physician visits on treatment tolerance and outcome in patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients who received a diagnosis of esophageal cancer who underwent CRT from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2016, as part of their curative-intent management were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included the patients’ marital status, caregiver presence at each physician visit, baseline performance status, serum albumin values and leukocyte values throughout treatment, patient weight values throughout treatment, tumor response to therapy, and overall survival. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on frequency of caregiver presence at physician visits (

Purpose Early-stage lung cancer survivorsremain at high risk for recurrence or second cancers. We measured the rates and determinants of regular surveillance imaging in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors. Methods Patients (diagnosed 2001–2011) with resected stage I and II NSCLC were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. Patients were censored at recurrence/second cancer diagnosis, loss to follow-up or death. Receipt of a scan during the surveillance periods of 7–18, 19–30, 31–42 and 43–60 months from date of surgery was assessed. Results Of 10,680 survivors assessed during the 18-month surveillance period, 71% received imaging in first 18 months. Only 56% and 43% continued to receive regular imaging by 30-month and 60-month of follow-up, respectively. Survivors were less likely to receive imaging if they were older, black, unmarried, received no adjuvant therapy, had stage I disease (vs. stage II) or were diagnosed before 2006. In adjusted analysis, survivors who received recommended imaging up to 18 months from surgery experienced better survival compared to survivors who did not (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85–0.99). Survival benefit was also observed in survivors who underwent regular imaging up to 5 years from surgery (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60–0.78). Conclusions More than half the lung cancer survivors received less than the recommended long-term surveillance imaging. Long-term adherence to surveillance is associated with improved survival. Our study provides evidence to support the current clinical guidelines for surveillance for lung cancer survivors that are primarily consensus-based at present.

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with an estimated 2,093,876 new lung cancers and 1,761,007 deaths from lung cancer in 2018 (1). Out of the 85% of lung cancers that are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 30% of patients will present with unresectable Stage III disease for which combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) is the recommended treatment (2,3).

To identify clinical parameters that are prognostic for improved overall survival (OS) after yttrium-90 radioembolization (RE) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).A total of 131 patients who underwent RE for liver metastases from CRC, treated at 2 academic centers, were reviewed. Twenty-one baseline pretreatment clinical factors were analyzed in relation to OS by the Kaplan-Meier method along with log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.The median OS from first RE procedure was 10.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-12.7 months). Several pretreatment factors, including lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; ≤20 ng/mL), lower aspartate transaminase (AST; ≤40 IU/L), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)5, and absence of extrahepatic disease at baseline were associated with significantly improved OS after RE, compared with high CEA (20 ng/mL), high AST (40 IU/L), NLR ≥5, and extrahepatic metastases (P values of.001,.001, .0001, and .04, respectively). On multivariate analysis, higher CEA, higher AST, NLR ≥5, extrahepatic disease, and larger volume of liver metastases remained independently associated with risk of death (hazard ratios of 1.63, 2.06, 2.22, 1.48, and 1.02, respectively).The prognosis of patients with metastases from CRC is impacted by a complex set of clinical parameters. This analysis of pretreatment factors identified lower AST, lower CEA, lower NLR, and lower tumor burden (intra- or extrahepatic) to be independently associated with higher survival after hepatic RE. Optimal selection of patients with CRC liver metastases may improve survival rates after administration of yttrium-90.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 85% of all lung cancers (1,2). The prognosis for patients with metastatic or stage IV NSCLC is extremely poor with five-year survival rates of less than 5% (3).

Objectives The tumor suppressor gene SMAD4 (DPC4) is genetically inactivated in approximately half of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs). We examined whether Smad4 tumor status was associated with outcomes after adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for resected PDAs. Methods Patients treated with adjuvant CRT were identified (N = 145). Smad4 status was determined by immunolabeling and graded as intact or lost. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable competing risk analyses were performed. Results On multivariate competing risk analysis, Smad4 loss was associated with increased risk of local recurrence (LR) (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.11; P = 0.027), distant failure (DF) (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.83; P = 0.037), and synchronous LR and DF at first recurrence (14.9 % vs 5.3%, P = 0.07) compared with Smad4 intact cancers. Smad4 loss was not associated with median overall survival (22 vs 22 months; P = 0.63) or disease-free survival (lost [13.6 months] vs intact [13.5 months], P = 0.79). Conclusions After PDA resection and adjuvant CRT, Smad4 loss correlated with higher risk of LR and DF, but not with survival. Smad4 loss may help predict which surgical patients are at higher risk for failure after definitive management and may benefit from intensified adjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a critical treatment for borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma ((B)RPC). The PREOPANC trials employ a short course chemoradiation (SCCRT) regimen of 3600 cGy in 15 fractions with concurrent gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy, but little is known about the relative efficacy of capecitabine (CAPE)-based concurrent chemotherapy in this population. We hypothesize that patients treated with SCCRT with CAPE-based concurrent chemotherapy will have superior overall survival (OS) compared to GEM-based strategies. MATERIALS/METHODS Medical records were retrospectively reviewed at a single center for patients diagnosed with (B)RPC between 1/2005 and 12/2020. Patients treated with neoadjuvant SCCRT were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were quantified for baseline characteristics. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, statistical difference was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) when controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS Thirty-one (n = 31) patients were included in the analysis. 71% of patients (n = 22) were treated with CAPE-based concurrent chemotherapy, while 29% of patients (n = 9) were treated with GEM-based concurrent chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 65 (interquartile range (IQR): 60 to 71) for the CAPE group, compared to 66 (IQR: 63 to 71) for the GEM group, P = 0.414. 100% of patients in the CAPE group were borderline resectable, compared to 82% of patients in the GEM group, P = 0.171. 44% of patients in the CAPE group were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, compared to 14% in the GEM group, P = 0.016. Patients treated with concurrent 5-CAPE-based chemotherapy had a longer median OS than other concurrent chemotherapy approaches: Not reached (95% confidence interval (CI): 24 to not reached) vs. 17 months (95% CI: 6 to 22 months), P < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for borderline vs. resectable status, age at diagnosis, and use of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, demonstrated that CAPE-based concurrent chemotherapy had a HR of death of 0.081 (95% CI: 0.018 to 0.369, P = 0.0012) compared to GEM-based concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Patients diagnosed with (B)RPC have many therapeutic options; this study suggests a benefit to CAPE-based concurrent chemotherapy when treating patients with SCCRT, even after controlling for significant confounding by greater use of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX with CAPE-based concurrent chemotherapy. SCCRT may be more effective with concurrent capecitabine instead of concurrent gemcitabine for (B)RPC.

Purpose/Objective(s) Radiation therapy (RT) remains a critical treatment modality for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with proton beam therapy (PBT) being widely utilized due to its decreased exit dose compared to photon-based RT. We hypothesize that patients with HCC receiving definitive PBT would experience decreased acute toxicity when compared to those receiving photon-based RT. Materials/Methods Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution for patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC and treated with definitive RT between 1/2011 and 12/2020. Patients treated with prior surgery or radiofrequency ablation were excluded. Progress notes and treatment summaries were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics including age at diagnosis, Child-Pugh classification (CPC), AJCC 8th edition T stage, performance status, and RT dose. Acute treatment toxicities were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Descriptive statistics were quantified for baseline characteristics. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated to determine the association between PBT vs. photon therapy and acute radiation toxicities in bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results Forty-six patients were included in the analysis. 24 (52%) patients received PBT while 22 (48%) received photon-based RT. Median age for the PBT and photon-based RT groups were 67 (interquartile range (IQR): 58.6 to 72.5) and 65.5 years (IQR: 61.0 to 73.0), respectively (P = 0.991). 50% of patients who received PBT had a T stage greater than T2, compared to 71% of patient in the photon group (P = 0.148). 42% of the PBT group had CPC B or worse, compared to 38% in the photon group (P = 0.813). Performance status and total dose did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.351 and P = 0.773, respectively). PBT was associated with higher odds of any grade radiation dermatitis (RD) (OR = 6.00, 95% CI: 1.13 to 31.9) and lower odds of any grade anorexia (OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.91). Odds of any grade diarrhea and fatigue, did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.086 and P = 0.958, respectively). After controlling for performance status, total dose, T stage, CPC, and age at diagnosis, PBT was still associated with higher odds of RD (OR = 11.07, 95% CI: 1.14 to 107.71) and lower odds of anorexia (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.93). Conclusion This study provides evidence that although PBT appears to have a superior safety profile in regard to acute anorexia, patients treated with PBT have higher odds of acute RD; these effects persist even after controlling for relevant confounding factors. PBT may result in fewer GI toxicities at the cost of greater skin toxicity.

Background: This study seeks to quantify and compare bone marrow tolerance during postoperative chemotherapy therapy between rectal cancer vs. colon cancer patients. During rectal cancer treatment, patients receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) irradiation which can exacerbate the hematologic toxicity (HT) via incidental irradiation of the pelvic bone marrow (PBM) during myelosuppressive postoperative chemotherapy. In contrast, colon cancer patients receive the same postoperative myelosuppressive chemotherapy but do not routinely receive preoperative chemoradiation therapy. This comparison will help elucidate the lasting myelosuppressive effects of incidental pelvic bone marrow (PBM) irradiation on rectal cancer patients during neoadjuvant preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Methods: Rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative CRT followed by postoperative 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (OxF) chemotherapy (n=35) were compared to colon cancer patients who received only postoperative OxF chemotherapy (n=42). End points were ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity (HT3) or hematologic event (HE) defined as ≥ grade 2 HT and a dose reduction in OxF. Wilcoxon rank sum test tested continuous variables and Chi-squared test measured differences in categorical variables. HT3 and HE probability during postoperative chemotherapy was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Results: During OxF chemotherapy, 40.0% (n=14) of rectal cancer patients experienced HT3 compared to 26.1% (n=11) of colon cancer patients (P=0.4). HE was experienced by 48% (n=17) of rectal cancer patients compared to 36% (n=15) of colon cancer patients (P=0.36). Rectal cancer patients were likelier to experience HT3 on multivariable cox regression analysis, controlling for several clinical covariates, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.49, [(95% CI: 1.02–6.02), P=0.045] than colon cancer patients. While rectal cancer patients were more likely to experience HE than colon cancer patients on multivariable Cox regression analysis with a HR of 1.8 (95% CI: 0.95–3.75), this only trended in statistical significance, P=0.07. Conclusions: Rectal cancer patients are more likely than colon cancer patients to experience hematologic toxicities impacting the tolerance of standard of care chemotherapeutics during adjuvant therapy. Focused PBM sparing during radiation therapy for rectal cancer patients may improve tolerance of myelosuppressive chemotherapeutic agents delivered in the postoperative setting.

The treatment of gastric cancer requires a multimodal approach to decrease the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence. The optimal timing of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy continues to be explored in ongoing trials. In the United States, surgical resection is often followed by adjuvant chemoradiation therapy or by a combination of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report on 4 patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma who were treated with a combination of these 2 approaches, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

BACKGROUND Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poor. Until recently, a standard of care was concurrent chemoradiation alone. Patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with anti-programmed death 1 antibodies have demonstrated improved OS. This trial evaluated pembrolizumab as consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiation in patients with unresectable stage III disease. METHODS Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide, cisplatin and pemetrexed, or carboplatin and paclitaxel and 59.4 to 66.6 Gy of radiation. Patients with nonprogression of disease were enrolled and received pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 months). The primary endpoint was the time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. RESULTS The median follow-up for 93 patients (92 for efficacy) was 32.2 months (range, 1.2-46.6 months). The median TMDD was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.7 months to not reached), which was significantly longer than the historical control of 12 months (P

Purpose Several sentinel phase III randomized trials have recently been published challenging traditional radiation therapy (RT) practices for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline reviews the evidence for thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for both limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. Methods The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on indications, dose fractionation, techniques and timing of thoracic RT for LS-SCLC, the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional RT in stage I or II node negative SCLC, PCI for LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, and thoracic consolidation for ES-SCLC. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. Results The task force strongly recommends definitive thoracic RT administered once or twice daily early in the course of treatment for LS-SCLC. Adjuvant RT is conditionally recommended in surgically resected patients with positive margins or nodal metastases. Involved field RT delivered using conformal advanced treatment modalities to postchemotherapy volumes is also strongly recommended. For patients with stage I or II node negative disease, SBRT or conventional fractionation is strongly recommended, and chemotherapy should be delivered before or after SBRT. In LS-SCLC, PCI is strongly recommended for stage II or III patients who responded to chemoradiation, conditionally not recommended for stage I patients, and should be a shared decision for patients at higher risk of neurocognitive toxicities. In ES-SCLC, radiation oncologist consultation for consideration of PCI versus magnetic resonance surveillance is strongly recommended. Lastly, the use of thoracic RT is strongly recommended in select patients with ES-SCLC after chemotherapy treatment, including a conditional recommendation in those responding to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Conclusions RT plays a vital role in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. These guidelines inform best clinical practices for local therapy in SCLC.

IMPORTANCE: The patterns of disease recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To define patterns of recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy and the association with survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospectively collected data from the phase 3 European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 4 adjuvant clinical trial, an international multicenter study. The study included 730 patients who had resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Data were analyzed between July 2017 and May 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to adjuvant gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus capecitabine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival, recurrence, and sites of recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 730 patients, median age was 65 years (range 37-81 years), 414 were men (57%), and 316 were women (43%). The median follow-up time from randomization was 43.2 months (95% CI, 39.7-45.5 months), with overall survival from time of surgery of 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.8-29.9 months) with gemcitabine and 30.2 months (95% CI, 25.8-33.5 months) with the combination (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P = .03). The 5-year survival estimates were 17.1% (95% CI, 11.6%-23.5%) and 28.0% (22.0%-34.3%), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 479 patients (65.6%); another 78 patients (10.7%) died without recurrence. Local recurrence occurred at a median of 11.63 months (95% CI, 10.05-12.19 months), significantly different from those with distant recurrence with a median of 9.49 months (95% CI, 8.44-10.71 months) (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45; P = .04). Following recurrence, the median survival was 9.36 months (95% CI, 8.08-10.48 months) for local recurrence and 8.94 months (95% CI, 7.82-11.17 months) with distant recurrence (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09; P = .27). The median overall survival of patients with distant-only recurrence (23.03 months; 95% CI, 19.55-25.85 months) or local with distant recurrence (23.82 months; 95% CI, 17.48-28.32 months) was not significantly different from those with only local recurrence (24.83 months; 95% CI, 22.96-27.63 months) (P = .85 and P = .35, respectively). Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had a 21% reduction of death following recurrence compared with monotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There were no significant differences between the time to recurrence and subsequent and overall survival between local and distant recurrence. Pancreatic cancer behaves as a systemic disease requiring effective systemic therapy after resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00058201, EudraCT 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN 96397434.

8512 Background: KEYNOTE-799 (NCT03631784) is an ongoing study of the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (pembro) plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) in patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced stage III NSCLC. Prior results from this study in a subset of pts (primary efficacy population) showed an ORR of 69.6% in cohort A (squamous and nonsquamous, n = 112) and 70.5% in cohort B (nonsquamous, n = 61), and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in 8.0% and 7.9% of pts, respectively. Here, we present results for all pts enrolled in KEYNOTE-799. Methods: This nonrandomized, multisite, open-label phase 2 trial enrolled pts aged ≥18 y with previously untreated, unresectable, pathologically confirmed, stage IIIA‒C NSCLC with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pts in cohort A (squamous and nonsquamous) received 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and pembro 200 mg. After 3 wks, pts received carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 QW for 6 wks and 2 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W plus standard thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Pts in cohort B (nonsquamous only) received 3 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2,and pembro 200 mg Q3W, and TRT in cycles 2 and 3. All pts received an additional 14 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W. Primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and the incidence of grade ≥3 pneumonitis (per NCI CTCAE v4.0). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all pts as-treated. Results: Of 216 pts enrolled in KEYNOTE-799 (cohort A, n = 112; cohort B, n = 104), 112 in cohort A and 102 in cohort B received treatment. As of October 28, 2020, the median (range) time from first dose to database cutoff was 18.5 (13.6–23.8) mo in cohort A and 13.7 (2.9–23.5) mo in cohort B. ORR (95% CI) was 70.5% (61.2%‒78.8%) in cohort A and 70.6% (60.7%‒79.2%) in cohort B. Median DOR was not reached in either cohort (Table). ORR was similar regardless of PD-L1 status ([TPS