1. What is the most useful imaging parameter to explore the prognostic value of the right ventricular function at the time of multimodality cardiovascular imaging?
- Author
-
Stéphanie Cazalbou, Vanessa Chong Fah Shen, Michel Galinier, Hervé Rousseau, Antoine Petermann, Isabelle Berry, Pauline Fournier, Yoan Lavie-Badie, Jerome Roncalli, Eve Cariou, Didier Carrié, Olivier Lairez, D. Eyharts, and Alexia Hennig
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Right ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Radionuclide ventriculography ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Isovolumetric contraction ,Heart transplantation ,Ejection fraction ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Annular velocity ,Ventricular assist device ,Heart failure ,Ventricular Function, Right ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND Right ventricular (RV) function is a powerful independent predictor of adverse heart failure outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of main RV systolic imaging parameters for outcome. METHODS Seventy-nine patients underwent comprehensive cardiovascular imaging modalities including transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and tomographic equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERV) for the assessment of RV function. The composite primary endpoint (CPE) was defined by the occurrence of death, heart transplantation, implantation of a left ventricular assist device, or new-onset acute heart failure. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 13 ± 9 months, 15 (19%) patients reached the CPE. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves for the prediction of the CPE were 0.922 (P
- Published
- 2020