1. Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection
- Author
-
Seiji Arai, Masashi Nomura, Hiroshi Nakayama, Yoshitaka Sekine, Daisuke Oka, Kazuhiko Kotani, Takahiro Syuto, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Hiroshi Matsui, Masami Murakami, Hidekazu Koike, Yoshiyuki Miyazawa, and Yasuhiro Shibata
- Subjects
Calcitonin ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sepsis ,procalcitonin ,Urology ,Lipopolysaccharide Receptors ,Procalcitonin ,C-reactive protein ,Risk Factors ,Bacterial infections ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Risk factor ,Aged ,Urinary tract infection ,biology ,business.industry ,Septic shock ,Research ,Presepsin ,Area under the curve ,Patient Acuity ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Shock, Septic ,Peptide Fragments ,Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome ,Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,Systemic inflammatory response syndrome ,Endotoxins ,Reproductive Medicine ,Urinary Tract Infections ,biology.protein ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Cytokines ,RC870-923 ,Flank pain ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Background Recently, presepsin has been reported to be a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis and evaluation of prognosis in septic patients. However, few reports have evaluated its usefulness in patients with urinary tract infections (UTI). This study aimed to evaluate whether presepsin could be a valuable marker for detecting severe sepsis, and whether it could predict the therapeutic course in patients with UTI compared with markers already used: procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods From April 2014 to December 2016, a total of 50 patients with urinary tract infections admitted to Gunma university hospital were enrolled in this study. Vital signs, presepsin, PCT, CRP, white blood cell (WBC) count, causative agents of urinary-tract infections, and other data were evaluated on the enrollment, third, and fifth days. The patients were divided into two groups: with (n = 11) or without (n = 39) septic shock on the enrollment day, and with (n = 7) or without (n = 43) sepsis on the fifth day, respectively. Presepsin was evaluated as a biomarker for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or septic shock. Results Regarding the enrollment day, there was no significant difference of presepsin between the SIRS and non-SIRS groups (p = 0.276). The median value of presepsin (pg/mL) was significantly higher in the septic shock group (p p = 0.007). ROC curve for diagnosing septic shock indicated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881 for presepsin (vs. 0.690, 0.583, and 0.527 for PCT, CRP and WBC, respectively). Regarding the 5th day after admission, the median presepsin value on the enrollment day was significantly higher in the SIRS groups than in the non-SIRS groups (p = 0.006). On the other hand, PCT (≥ 2 ng/ml) on the enrollment day was an independent risk factor for SIRS. ROC curve for diagnosing sepsis on the fifth day indicated an AUC of 0.837 for PCT (vs. 0.817, 0.811, and 0.802 for presepsin, CRP, and WBC, respectively). Conclusions This study showed that presepsin may be a good marker for diagnosing septic shock based on admission data in patients with UTI.
- Published
- 2021