Search

Introduction Adding pertuzumab(P) on trastuzumab(H) with cytotoxic chemotherapy increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of early or locally advanced HER2 positive breast cancer (EBC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Since 63.6% of pCR rate has been reported from TRYPHAENA trial, TCHP regimen has been used as a standard of neoadjuvant treatment regimen for patients with HER2 positive EBC. However, this regimen has profound toxicities in terms of myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, and etc. Furthermore we still need more information on clinical outcomes and toxicities with this regimen. Therefore, we report real world experience of EBC patients treated with neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical record of EBC patients who received neoadjuvant TCHP. Information which we gathered included patients’ and tumor characteristics at the time of diagnosis, details of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathologic assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant TCHP and recurrence free survival after curative surgery. pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0). Results Between February 2016 and August 2019, 447 patients were treated with neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery. Median age at BC diagnosis was 56. In clinical stage, stage II was 54.6% and 45.4% of stage III and hormone receptor (HR) positive BC was 48.3%. Most commonly reported adverse event(AE) was mucositis (84%) followed by diarrhea (77%). In terms of Grade 3 AE, anorexia(6%), diarrhea(2%) were frequently observed and 9(2%) of febrile neutropenia occurred despite of prophylactic use of peg-filgrastim. Forty percent of patients experienced dose reduction due to AEs. Of 447 patients, 29% of patients underwent total mastectomy and 71% of breast conserving surgery. In terms of clinical outcome, pCR rate was 64%; 77% of HR negative BCs and 50% of HR positive BCs. Among baseline characteristics, high nuclear grade, high histologic grade, HR stats affected to pCR status (Ps Key words: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HER2+ breast cancer, pertuzumab, pathologic complete response Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park. Real Would Evidence (RWE) of neoadjuvant docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) in patients with HER2 positive early or locally advanced breast cancer treated Single institutional experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-38.

Background: Margetuximab (M) is an investigational Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody with the same epitope specificity as trastuzumab (T). Relative to T, Fc engineering of M increases binding affinity for the activating Fc receptor (FcR) CD16A and decreases affinity for the inhibitory FcR CD32B. The SOPHIA trial (NCT02492711) randomized pretreated HER2+ MBC patients to either M or T, each with chemotherapy (C). M+C improved progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over T+C. Infusion related reactions (IRR) have been observed after infusion of therapeutic proteins, typically during the first infusion, with a first-dose incidence of up to 40% for T (Herceptin Prescribing Information®). A retrospective analysis of 197 patients showed 16% IRRs on T, mostly after the first infusion; this rate was lower with (10%) compared to without (19%) premedication (Thompson, 2014). Here, we report IRR safety and tolerability data in the SOPHIA trial patients following HER2-targeted antibody therapy. Methods: The open-label Phase 3 SOPHIA trial enrolled patients with HER2+ MBC after at least 2 prior anti-HER2 therapies, including pertuzumab; 91% in both groups also received ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Randomization of 536 patients was 1:1 to M (15 mg/kg IV q3w) or T (6 [8 loading dose] mg/kg IV q3w), each with Investigator selected C (standard dose capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). M was given as 120-minute infusions. T was given as a 90-minute infusion in Cycle 1, then a 30-minute infusion from Cycle 2 onward. Recommended elective premedication included acetaminophen, ibuprofen, diphenhydramine, ranitidine, dexamethasone, or equivalents. IRR safety analyses were conducted on 530 patients (264 M+C and 266 T+C) that received any study therapy. Results: A higher proportion of patients experienced IRRs on the M arm (35 [13.3%]) than on the T arm (9 [3.4%]). Most IRRs in both groups were severity Grade 1 or 2, occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1, and resolved within 24 hours. In patients receiving M, Grade 3 IRR occurred in 4 patients (1.5%), including 3 after vinorelbine and 1 after eribulin. Adverse events associated with Grade 3 IRRs included chills, fever, nausea, diarrhea, dyspnea, and/or hypertension. Two patients receiving M (0.8%) discontinued due to IRR, versus none on T. Of patients with IRRs, the most common symptoms in both treatment groups were chills (M: 17 [48.6%]; T: 5 [55.6%]) and fever (M: 13 [37.1%]; T: 2 [22.2%]). There was no observed hypotension in either group. In both groups, more than half of IRR events were addressed by dose interruption only. All IRRs all were medically manageable. IRR rates were higher in patients without premedication for both groups. Of 264 subjects receiving M, 218 (82.6%) received premedication and 46 (17.4%) did not; IRRs were observed in 28 (12.8%) of those receiving premedication and 7 (15.2%) of those not premedicated. All 4 patients on M with Grade 3 IRRs received premedication, 3 with steroids. Of 266 subjects receiving T, 173 (65%) received premedication and 93 (35%) did not; IRRs were observed in 5 (2.9%) of those receiving premedication and 4 (4.3%) of those not premedicated. IRR risk was unaffected by chemotherapy subgroup or CD16A genotype. Conclusions: In the SOPHIA trial, IRR events occurred in a greater proportion of patients on M than on T. Most were mild to moderate in severity, limited to Cycle 1, and resolved on the same day. Symptom patterns were similar between groups, and premedication did not eliminate the hazard of IRRs in either group. Severe IRRs and discontinuations due to IRRs were rare. IRRs on first infusion of M appear to resemble those observed following first infusion of T. Citation Format: Javier Cortes, Fatima Cardoso, Giuseppe Curigliano, William J Gradishar, Seock-Ah Im, Hope S Rugo, Shakeela W Bahadur, Alfredo Falcone, Serafin Morales Murillo, David A Riseberg, Antonino Musolino, Trevor M Feinstein, Miguel H Abreu, Young-Hyuck Im, Yelena Novik, Timothy Pluard, Lupe G Salazar, Rossana Berardi, Viorela Pop, Shengyan Hong, Kenneth Jacobs, Edwin Rock, Mark D Pegram. Infusion related reactions in the phase 3 SOPHIA trial of margetuximab + chemotherapy vs trastuzumab + chemotherapy in patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-24.

Purpose: Resistance to treatment with endocrine therapy in patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) is common and dual inhibition of CDK4/6 and PI3K pathways may delay the development of resistance. This phase Ib trial evaluates the safety and tolerability of triple and double regimens containing the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib. Patients and Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study, 70 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC were enrolled into one of four treatment combinations: ribociclib (once daily, 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus fulvestrant; ribociclib (continuous dosing) plus fulvestrant; ribociclib plus alpelisib plus fulvestrant; or ribociclib plus buparlisib plus fulvestrant. Results: The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ribociclib was confirmed to be 600 mg (3 weeks on, 1 week off) and 400 mg (continuous dosing) plus fulvestrant 500 mg. For the triple combination with buparlisib, the RP2D was ribociclib 400 mg plus buparlisib 30 mg plus fulvestrant 500 mg. Enrollment for the triple combinations was stopped due to unexpected toxicity. No RP2D was determined for the alpelisib combination. The safety profiles of the ribociclib plus fulvestrant combinations were consistent with those in previous studies. There was no marked difference in ribociclib exposure in the presence of triple-combination partners. The highest overall response rate was seen in the buparlisib triple combination (25.0%; 95% confidence interval, 9.8–46.7). Conclusions: Ribociclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated safety in the treatment of patients with HR+, HER2− ABC. Triple combinations with alpelisib or buparlisib plus fulvestrant are not recommended for phase II investigation. See related commentary by Clark et al., p. 371

We investigated the expression profiles of immune genes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to identify the prognostic value of immune genes and their clinical implications. NanoString nCounter Analysis of 770 immune-related genes was used to measure immune gene expression in patients with TNBC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy at Samsung Medical Center between 2000 and 2004. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify the associations between gene expression and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). Of 1189 patients who underwent curative BC surgery, 200 TNBC patients were included and stage was the only clinical factor predictive of DRFS. In terms of immune genes, 155 of 770 genes were associated with DRFS (p

Introduction: According to phase II clinical trial of endocrine treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after tamoxifen treatment in premenopausal women, fulvestrant plus goserelin (F+G) has better clinical outcome than goserelin (G) alone in premenopausal women, in terms of time to progression (TTP). However, aromatase inhibitor (AI) with goserelin (A+G) is not superior to goserelin alone. Among three treatment arms, difference of overall survival (OS) was not observed. Accompanied with this clinical trial, we conducted further genotyping to identify alleles at some genomic loci associated with clinical outcome of endocrine treatments in premenopausal women with HR+ MBC. Methods: This prospective genotyping study included patients enrolled in a randomized phase II clinical trial of fulvestrant plus goserelin versus anastrozole plus goserelin versus goserelin alone for HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-negative tamoxifen-pretreated premenopausal women with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (KCSG BR10-04). To isolate genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes, we used the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, WI) and Axiom Precision Medicine Research Array (PMRA) (ThermoFisher, CA) was used to genotyping array. Survival analyses for time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To determine the association between clinical outcomes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we used an R package for genome-wide survival analysis (gwasurvivr). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for univariate and multivariate analyses. Finally, SNPs with adjusted p-value Results: Of 138 participants, genomic DNA was collected and extracted from 127 participants. After quality control (QC), 103 genomic DNA were finally selected for genotyping (35 in F+G, 36 in A+G and 32 in G group). Patients with age under 40 were 34 (33%) and visceral metastases were observed in 50 patients (49%). Medial TTP was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.3, 19.3) and median OS was 59.6 months (95% CI: 41.1, 78.1). Among 523,289 SNPs, 76 SNPs were associated with TTP (adjusted p-value Conclusions: Genetic polymorphisms influenced the clinical outcome of HR+ MBC patients treated with anti-hormonal therapy. Further studies on the functional mechanisms relating to these SNPs in these genes are warranted. Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Kyung Hae Jung, Keun Seok Lee, Joohyuk Sohn, Jee Hyun Kim, Hae Hyun Jung, Minjoo Lee, Young-Hyuck Im. Genome-wide association study predict prognosis of hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women with endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-50.

Background: MONALEESA-7 is a Phase III study (NCT02278120) and the only dedicated trial of endocrine therapy (ET) ± a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The study demonstrated that the addition of ribociclib (RIB) to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) or tamoxifen (TAM) + goserelin (GOS) significantly extended both progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio, 0.55; Tripathy D et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018) and overall survival (OS; hazard ratio, 0.71; Im S-A et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and work productivity are other important aspects of clinical benefit, especially in the premenopausal population. We present analyses of QOL and work productivity from MONALEESA-7. Methods: Premenopausal or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC were treated with RIB or placebo (PBO) + GOS with either an NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole) or TAM. A secondary endpoint was evaluation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for HRQOL using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life questionnaire core 30 (QLQ-C30). Assessments included global health status as well as social, emotional, and physical functioning. Description of Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) was an exploratory endpoint and was measured using the WPAI Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI:GH; V2.0). Results: Time to deterioration (TTD) ≥ 10% in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status was prolonged with RIB vs PBO (median, 35.8 vs 23.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.665 [95% CI, 0.517-0.855]). TTD ≥ 10% in emotional functioning was also prolonged with RIB vs PBO (hazard ratio, 0.636 [95% CI, 0.488-0.828]), as was TTD ≥ 10% in social functioning (hazard ratio, 0.813 [95% CI, 0.610-1.084]) and TTD ≥ 10% in physical functioning (hazard ratio, 0.715 [95% CI, 0.526-0.972]). Compliance rates with the WPAI:GH were > 99% at baseline and > 98% at the end of treatment. Neither arm had an increase from baseline to the end of treatment in mean percentage of work missed due to overall health. Change in percent activity impairment due to overall health was comparable between treatment arms, as were change in percent impairment while working due to overall health and percent overall work impairment due to overall health. The trends observed with RIB vs PBO in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and WPAI:GH in the overall population were generally similar in the NSAI cohort. Conclusions: WPAI and global health are important considerations in the premenopausal patient population. Analysis of PROs demonstrated that TTD ≥ 10% in global health status and emotional functioning were prolonged with RIB vs PBO. Social and physical functioning were maintained in both treatment arms. Results in various WPAI domains demonstrated that productivity was also maintained in both groups. These QOL and WPAI results, in addition to the significantly longer PFS and OS results with RIB vs PBO, indicate a substantial clinical benefit with RIB treatment in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. Citation Format: Nadia Harbeck, Sara Hurvitz, Aditya Bardia, Fabio Franke, K. Gonvind Babu, Paul Wheatley-Price, Young-Hyuck Im, Kadri Altundag, Antonia Ridolfi, David Chandiwana, Brad Lanoue, Lakshmi Menon, Debu Tripathy. Patient-reported outcomes, including work productivity, from the MONALEESA-7 trial of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-06.

Background: The APHINITY trial demonstrated that pertuzumab, when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy, modestly but statistically significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) among patients with HER2-positive, operable breast cancer. From November 2011 until August 2013, 2400 patients were randomly assigned to receive pertuzumab and 2405 to receive placebo. The clinical cut off-date for the primary analysis was 19 Dec 2016 after a median follow-up of 45.4 months. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the estimates of the 3-year rates of IDFS were 94.1% in the pertuzumab group and 93.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.00; P=0.045). The benefit appeared more pronounced in patients with node-positive disease, with a HR of 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.96), and in those with hormone receptor-negative disease, where the HR was 0.76 (95% CI 0.56-1.04). Based on these results, pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab was approved for high risk early HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The first interim analysis of OS took place at that same time. A total of 169 patients had died, with no significant treatment effect with regards to mortality found at that time. Diarrhea, grade 3 or higher, was more frequent within the pertuzumab group (9.8%) compared with the placebo group (3.7%). Heart failure, cardiac death, and cardiac dysfunction were infrequent in both treatment groups. Results: At 74.1 months of median follow-up (clinical cut-off date June 19, 2019), we now report results of the pre-planned, calendar-driven second interim OS analysis which requires a p-value of 0.0012 to reach statistical significance. Updated descriptive analyses of IDFS and cardiac safety were also performed. Fewer deaths were observed in the pertuzumab (P) arm [125 (5.2%) vs 147 (6.1%)], however statistical significance was not reached at this interim analysis. The hazard ratio for OS is 0.85 [95% CI 0.67-1.07 (p=0.17)]; 6-year OS percents are 94.8% vs 93.9% (0.9% difference).Updated IDFS results based on 508 events in the ITT population are: hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.91]; 6-year IDFS percents are 90.6% vs 87.8% (2.8% difference). Of note, the difference was due mainly to the reduction in distant (5.9% vs 7.7%) and loco-regional (1.2% vs 2.0%) BC relapses. The node-positive cohort continues to derive clear benefit from the addition of P: hazard ratio 0.72 (95% CI 0.59-0.87). The benefit in terms of 6-year IDFS percent is 4.5% [87.9% vs 83.4%].In the node-negative cohort, the IDFS hazard ratio is 1.02 (95% CI; 0.69-1.53) with 95% of patients being event-free in both arms at 6 years.With longer follow up, a treatment benefit of P is also seen in the hormone receptor (HR) positive cohort: IDFS hazard ratio for HR positive is 0.73 (95% CI 0.59 -0.92). IDFS hazard ratio for HR negative is 0.83 (95% CI 0.63 -1.10). No new cardiac safety concerns emerged. One additional primary cardiac event (heart failure) was reported in the P arm and 1 additional patient in each arm had a secondary cardiac event resulting to 18 and 8 for primary cardiac events and 65 and 68 for secondary cardiac events in the P and placebo arms, respectively. The benefit of P in HER2+ early BC is maintained, with the greatest benefit continuing to be observed in the node positive population. With longer follow-up, the benefit of P no longer appears to depend on HR status. Continued follow up of patients is very important to determine possible benefit for OS. A calendar-driven third interim OS analysis is planned in 2.5 years, and the event-driven final OS analysis is planned when 640 deaths have occurred. Citation Format: Martine Piccart, Marion Procter, Debora Fumagalli, Evandro de Azambuja, Emma Clark, Michael S. Ewer, Eleonora Restuccia, Guy Jerusalem, Susan Dent, Linda Reaby, Hervé Bonnefoi, Ian Krop, Tsang-Wu Liu, Tadeusz Pieńkowski, Masakazu Toi, Nicolas Wilcken, Michael Andersson, Young-Hyuck Im, Ling-Ming Tseng, Hans-Joachim Lueck, Marco Colleoni, Estefania Monturus, Mihaela Sicoe, Sébastien Guillaume, José Bines, Richard Gelber, Giuseppe Viale, Christoph Thomssen. Interim overall survival analysis of APHINITY (BIG 4-11): A randomized multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus placebo as adjuvant therapy in patients with operable HER2-positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-04.

Introduction: Although HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is considered a moderately immunogenic tumor, several studies have shown a role of pre-existing immunity associated with favorable long-term prognosis and better response to treatment. In this study, we performed exploratory analyses to assess whether the efficacy of HER2 targeted treatment in the MARIANNE trial correlated with immune gene expression. Methods: MARIANNE (NCT01120184) is a phase 3 study in patients (pts) with centrally confirmed HER2+ local advanced/metastatic BC naïve to prior treatments in the advanced disease. Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to trastuzumab+taxane (HT), T-DM1, or T-DM1+Petuzumab (P) and the trial showed noninferior PFS of T-DM1 and T-DM1+P vs HT. Gene expression (RNA) analysis was performed on tumor samples by a custom 800-gene codeset on the nCounter platform. PD-L1, CD8 expressions and immune gene signatures (sign) analyses were assessed by multivariate Cox regression models using median (cut-off) as categorical variable and adjusted by prior HT, presence of visceral disease, world region, baseline ECOG, measureable disease at baseline, therapy setting, HER2 mRNA expression, PIK3CA mutation status. Results: MARIANNE randomized 1095 pts (HT, n=365; T-DM1, n=367; T-DM1+P, n=363). Gene expression results were available for 671 pts (61.3% of the intent-to-treat [ITT] population) which was representative of ITT. In ITT, HR below 1 was observed when comparing pts with high (>median) vs low (≤median) immune gene expression by clinical outcome suggesting a potential association of high immune marker expression with improved PFS (Table 1) and to some extent with OS (data not shown). This association was primarily observed in the T-DM1 arm where the HR suggested a risk reduction of disease progression(PD)/death especially in the high Teff, high PD-L1 and high CD8 subgroups, and to some extent in the HT arm (Table 1). When assessing the predictive impact on PFS by comparing T-DM1 vs HT, HR below 1 was observed especially in pts with high Teff signature, high PD-L1 and high CD8 expressions (HR 0.67 (95% CI (0.47-0.95)), HR 0.68 (95% CI (0.48-0.97), and HR 0.64 (95%CI 0.44-0.93), respectively). When comparing T-DM1+P vs. HT, HR below 1 was observed especially in pts with low Teff signature and low PD-L1 expression (HR 0.70 (95% CI (0.50-0.99), and HR 0.68 (95% CI (0.48-0.96) respectively). No clear differences between immune gene expression subgroups was observed when comparing treatment arms in regards to OS (data not shown). Conclusions: In the exploratory analysis from the MARIANNE study, high immune gene expression, especially in the high PD-L1, CD8 and Teff subgroups, showed an association with improved clinical benefit with HRs reflecting for a risk reduction of PD/death for PFS and partially for OS. This association was less obvious in the T-DM1+P arm. When comparing the treatments effect, the data showed a potential impact of high Teff signature, and high CD8 and PD-L1 expressions on T-DM1 and less on HT. The potential opposite association of low Teff signature and low PD-L1 expression with improved benefit in the T-DM1+P arm was unexpected and needs further investigation. Table 1: Prognostic biomarker effect on PFSBiomarker by categories (>Median vs ≤Median)HR (95% CI) ITT n=671HR (95% CI) HT n=220HR (95% CI) T-DM1 n=227HR (95% CI) T-DM1+P n=224Teff sign0.89 (0.73-1.09)0.97 (0.68-1.38)0.64 (0.45-0.91)1.09 (0.75-1.58)Th1 cytokine sign0.91 (0.74-1.11)0.92 (0.64-1.31)0.78 (0.55-1.11)0.96 (0.67-1.36)Checkpoint inhibitor sign0.95 (0.78-1.15)0.91 (0.64-1.29)0.90 (0.64-1.26)1.02 (0.71-1.47)PD-L10.80 (0.66-0.98)0.79 (0.55-1.13)0.62 (0.44-0.87)1.07 (0.74-1.55)CD80.91 (0.75-1.11)1.10 (0.77-1.57)0.66 (0.46-0.93)0.98 (0.68-1.41) Citation Format: Edith A Perez, Sanne Lysbet de Haas, Carlos H Barrios, Wolfgang Eiermann, Masakazu Toi, Young-Hyuck Im, Pier Franco Conte, Miguel Martin, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Xavier B Pivot, Howard A Burris III, Chiara Lambertini, Silke Hoersch, Monika Patre, Paul Anthony Ellis. Association of immune gene expression with outcome in the MARIANNE phase 3 clinical trial in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-11.

Background: Margetuximab (M) is an investigational Fc-engineered anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody that targets the same epitope as trastuzumab (T) and exerts similar antiproliferative effects. Compared with T, M has higher affinity for both the 158V (high-binding) and 158F (low-binding) allotypes of the activating Fc receptor CD16A. M enhances innate immunity, including CD16A-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and does so more effectively than T in vitro. Based on ex vivo experiments with cells collected from patients (pts) before and after treatment, M induces adaptive immunity, including enhanced T-cell clonality and induction of HER2-specific T- and B-cell responses. The SOPHIA trial (NCT02492711) showed that in pts with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), M+chemotherapy improved progression-free survival vs T+chemotherapy, with comparable safety. M is intended to be dosed at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with infusions over 120 min at every cycle (C). A substudy of SOPHIA was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of reduced infusion times from C2 onward. Methods: Eligible pts had HER2+ MBC after ≥4 lines of prior therapy for MBC, including prior T, pertuzumab, and ado-T emtansine. Enrolled pts received a 120-min M infusion, with or without chemotherapy, in C1, then either 60- or 30-min infusions in C2 and beyond. This single-arm substudy was unblinded, with no comparator. The primary objective was incidence of Grade 3 or greater infusion-related reactions (IRRs) by the end of C2. Incidence of all IRRs was a secondary objective. Results: Of 88 pts enrolled, 69 received M+chemotherapy and 19 received M alone. Mean age was 54.5 years; 99% were female and 71% white. The median number of cycles of M received was 3 (range 1-17). Overall, 7 pts were assigned to received 60-min M infusions starting at C2 (range 1-17 cycles), and 76 pts were assigned to received 30-min M infusions starting at C2 (range 1-14 cycles). Five pts did not receive C2 treatment due to non-radiologic progressive disease, unrelated adverse event (AE), patient or physician decision, or loss to follow-up. Eighty (91%) pts had premedication for IRRs. No pt had Grade ≥3 IRR. Overall, 18 (21%) had IRRs (2 Grade 1, 16 Grade 2), all but 1 of which occurred in C1 (120 min). Of the 18 pts with IRRs, 17 (94%) were premedicated and 10 (56%) were treated for IRRs. The overall rate of IRRs in premedicated pts was 21% (17/80) and in non-premedicated pts was 13% (1/8). One pt experienced IRRs in both C1 and C2 (Grade 2 in C1 and Grade 1 in C2); the same patient then received 6 additional cycles of M (30 min) with no IRRs after C2 (C3-8) and had no premedication after C1. No pt discontinued treatment due to an IRR. Of 88 pts enrolled, 85 (97%) pts experienced an AE, and 7 (8%) had Grade ≥3 AEs. Fifty (57%) pts had M-related AEs. The most common (>5% of pts) M-related AEs were IRRs in 17 (19%), fatigue in 9 (10%), diarrhea in 5 (6%), and aspartate aminotransferase increase in 5 (6%). Serious AEs occurred in 13/88 pts (15%), none of which were considered M-related by the investigator. Conclusions: In this heavily pretreated population, shorter M infusion times did not lead to an increase in IRRs. IRRs were most likely to occur during C1 when the infusion time was 120 min. No Grade ≥3 IRRs were observed. Of 18 pts with Grade 1-2 IRRs, only 1 had an IRR after C1. These results showed that the acceptable safety and tolerability profile of M was maintained even after infusion time is reduced to 30-min from C2 onward. Shorter infusion times may reduce the burden of chronic M therapy on pts, caregivers, and clinic staff. Citation Format: William J. Gradishar, Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mark D. Pegram, Antonino Musolino, Rosanna Berardi, Michelino De Laurentiis, Shakeela W. Bahadur, Young-Hyuck Im, Cynthia Lynch, Yelena Novik, Sutton Edlich, Edwin Rock, Shengyan Hong, Hope S. Rugo, SOPHIA Study Group. Phase 3 SOPHIA study of margetuximab + chemotherapy vs trastuzumab + chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer after prior anti-HER2 therapies: Infusion time substudy results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-04.

In this study, we evaluated clinical parameters to predict the primary resistance of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy as the first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We performed a data analysis of patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2-MBC who received palbociclib plus letrozole as the first-line treatment in the metastatic setting from the clinical data warehouse in Samsung Medical Center. In this study, 305 patients were included in the final data analysis. The median follow-up duration was 31 months, and we observed 123 cases of disease progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.7 months, and 38 patients (12.5%) had less than a 6-month PFS. The multivariate analysis suggested that primary resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (hazard ratio: 1.91), presence of liver metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.17), initial elevation of serum CA-15-3 (hazard ratio: 1.99), weak positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) (hazard ratio: 2.28), Ki-67 3+ or 4+ (hazard ratios: 2.58 and 10.28), and presence of mutation (hazard ratio: 9.59) were associated with a short PFS duration. A further prediction model was developed with data from 256 patients and 33 cases of disease progression in 6 months. This model included five factors—primary resistance to adjuvant ET (odds ratio, OR: 1.14), liver metastasis (OR: 1.56), initial CA-15-3 elevation (OR: 1.51), weak ER expression (OR: 2.22), and BRCA2 mutation (OR: 2.85)—and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.842 (95% CI: 0.775, 0.909; p < 0.001). Finally, we divided them into four risk groups according to the prediction model with the five risk factors. These four groups had different PFS (p < 0.001) and primary resistance of palbociclib with letrozole [OR of group 2 vs. group 1 (ref): 2.18 (p = 0.002), OR of group 3: 3.91 (p < 0.001), and OR of group 4: 4.25 (p < 0.001)]. We developed a prediction model of primary resistance to palbociclib with letrozole as the first-line treatment for HR+, HER2-MBC. Our prediction model might be helpful for considering the first-line treatment strategies. Further well-designed clinical trials would be warranted to validate our prediction model.

As most erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) patients currently receive dual HER2-targeting added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, improved methods for identifying individual response, and assisting post-surgical salvage therapy, are needed. Herein, we evaluated the 41-gene classifier trastuzumab advantage risk model (TRAR) as a predictive marker for patients enrolled in the NeoSphere trial. TRAR scores were computed from RNA of 350 pre- and 166 post-treatment tumor specimens. Overall, TRAR score was significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) rate independently of other predictive clinico-pathological variables. Separate analyses according to estrogen receptor (ER) status showed a significant association between TRAR score and pCR in ER-positive specimens but not in ER-negative counterparts. Among ER-positive BC patients not achieving a pCR, those with TRAR-low scores in surgical specimens showed a trend for lower distant event-free survival. In conclusion, in HER2-positive/ER-positive BC, TRAR is an independent predictor of pCR and represents a promising tool to select patients responsive to anti-HER2-based neoadjuvant therapy and to assist treatment escalation and de-escalation strategies in this setting.

Background: Loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding components of the homologous recombination DNA damage response (DDR) machinery, notably BRCA1/2, are associated with tumor sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Little is known about the potential contribution of tumor alterations in non-DDR genes to modulating sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in the clinic. In EMBRACA, the PARPi TALA improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR [95% CI] 0.54 [0.41-0.71], P Methods: Baseline tumor tissue from 308 pts (71%; intent-to-treat) was tested by FoundationOne®. To support exploratory identification of tumor gene alterations associated with best vs worst outcomes, pts were mapped into 2 groups: [1] BEST: Pts in TALA arm with OS ≥ 30 mo and duration of treatment ≥ 24 mo, Pts in CT arm with OS ≥ 30 mo; [2] WORST: Pts in TALA or CT arm with a PFS event (PD by Independent Radiological Facility or death) ≤ 12 wks. 2 pts had short PFS but long OS and were initially mapped to both groups but then assigned to BEST and excluded from WORST. Results: Exploratory heat map visualizations of known/likely pathogenic genetic alterations defined by the FoundationOne® gene panel were used to assess differences in genetic alterations between BEST and WORST in TNBC and non-TNBC subpopulations, leading to the identification of MYC and RAD21 as commonly altered genes of high interest. Based on these results showing imbalances in tumor amplification events between BEST and WORST outcome pts, Cox regression analysis was used to explore potential associations of MYC or RAD21 amplification with OS across the evaluable ITT population. In TNBC pts receiving TALA, OS was shorter with MYC amplification than without [HR (95% CI) 1.877 (1.102, 3.196)]. No such association was evident in TNBC pts receiving CT [HR (95% CI) 0.706 (0.303, 1.643)]. In contrast, for non-TNBC pts receiving TALA, no association with OS was evident for MYC amplification versus without [HR (95% CI) 0.603 (0.310, 1.173)], while for pts receiving CT OS was shorter with MYC amplification than without [HR (95% CI) 1.917 (1.037, 3.544)]. RAD21 amplification status was not associated with OS in either TNBC or non-TNBC patients for either treatment arm, although it should be noted that two RAD21 subgroups were very small (n=7 and 11; others had n ≥ 21). Conclusions: Based on these exploratory, retrospective analyses MYC amplification was associated with shorter OS in TNBC pts receiving TALA. This may reflect the role of MYC in positive regulation of genes involved in homologous recombination such as RAD51 (Carey et al, Cancer Res 2018;78(3):742-757). MYC and RAD21 are both located at 8q24 and frequently coamplified in breast cancer (eg, Annunziato et al, Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):397), hence the lack of association of RAD21 amplification with outcome in TNBC suggests that the association of MYC amplification with shorter OS seen in pts receiving TALA may be gene-specific. Further investigation is warranted. Funding: Pfizer TNBCNon-TNBCTALACTTALACTGene AlterationBest n=10Worst n=15Best n=7Worst n=16Best n=17Worst n=11Best n=20Worst n=11MYC amplification0 (0%)7 (47%)2 (29%)6 (38%)5 (29%)1 (9%)3 (15%)5 (46%)RAD21 amplification1 (10%)2 (13%)3 (43%)5 (31%)5 (29%)1 (9%)7 (35%)4 (36%) Citation Format: Johannes Ettl, A. Douglas Laird, Joanne L. Blum, Hope S. Rugo, Sara A. Hurvitz, Miguel Martín, Henri Roché, Young-Hyuck Im, Annabel Goodwin, Rinat Yerushalmi, Tiziana Usari, Silvana Lanzalone, Akos Czibere, Julia Hopkins, Lee A. Albacker, Lida A. Mina, Jennifer K. Litton. A retrospective analysis of association of MYC and RAD21 amplification with final overall survival (OS) data in the phase 3 EMBRACA study with talazoparib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07.

Background The continuum of anti-HER2 agents is a standard treatment of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study evaluated the efficacy of lapatinib plus vinorelbine in patients progressed on both trastuzumab and lapatinib treatments. Methods A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to lapatinib with vinorelbine (LV) (n = 75; lapatinib, 1000 mg daily; vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 D1, D8 q3w) or vinorelbine (V) (n = 74; 30 mg/m2 D1, D8 q3w). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks. Results The median number of previous anti-HER2 therapies was 2 (range 2–5). There was no significant difference in PFS rate at 18 weeks between LV and V arms (45.9% vs 38.9%, p = 0.40). ORR was 19.7% in LV arm, and 16.9% in V arm (p = 0.88). PFS and OS did not differ between two arms (LV vs V; median PFS, 16 vs 12 weeks, HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.22; median OS, 15.0 vs 18.9 months, HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.72–1.58). Toxicity profiles were similar in both arms and all were manageable. Conclusions Lapatinib plus vinorelbine treatment was tolerable; however, it failed to demonstrate the clinical benefits over vinorelbine alone in patients with HER2 + MBC after progression on both trastuzumab and lapatinib. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01730677.

Background/aims We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical activity of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy. Methods We reviewed the medical records of all patients with MBC treated at Samsung Medical Center between January 2009 and August 2016. Patients received fulvestrant 250 mg intramuscularly every 28 days (from January 2009 to November 2010) or 500 mg intramuscularly every 28 days (from December 2010 to August 2016). Tumor responses were assessed every 8 weeks and at the end of treatment, as well as when disease progression was suspected. Results A total of 84 patients were included in this study. A median of two previous endocrine treatments had been performed; 79% of the patients had received two or more endocrine treatments. Forty-five patients (54%) had been treated with chemotherapy for MBC before the fulvestrant treatment course. Visceral metastasis was found in 49 patients (58%). The estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4 to 5.5) and 32.5 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 47.4), respectively. The disease control rate was 40.5% (95% CI, 30.5 to 51.5); partial response was observed in 16% of the patients and stable disease was observed in 25% of the patients. The most frequently reported adverse reactions were mild-to-moderate grade myalgia (10.5% of the patients), injection site pain (7%), and fatigue (7%). Fulvestrant was generally well tolerated. Conclusion Fulvestrant showed encouraging clinical activity and favorable feasibility in postmenopausal women with MBC who had been treated with multiple endocrine therapies and/or cytotoxic chemotherapies.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a topical lotion (CG428) on hair thickness and density in breast cancer survivors with permanent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (PCIA). The study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial which conducted from February 2016 to December 2016 at the Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center in Seoul, South Korea. Breast cancer patients with PCIA were randomized on average of 3.5 years after chemotherapy. Topical lotion (Batch DT023) is a botanical drug under development containing a novel patented blend of 4 botanical ingredients: citrus, cocoa, guarana, and onion. Participants were asked to self-apply the study product or placebo twice per day for 6 months. Changes in hair density and thickness were assessed using a noninvasive bioengineering device, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 3 and 6 months after randomization. A total of 35 patients were randomized to intervention (N = 18) or placebo (N = 17). Patients in the intervention group were older than those in the placebo group (52.1 vs. 41.6 years; P

Background In this study, we observe the patterns initial palliative treatment for premenopausal patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC and determine if nonadherence to clinical guidelines are associated with worse clinical outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the South Korean population. Methods A retrospective review was performed for premenopausal patients diagnosed with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC between October 1997 and May 2016 who received palliative systemic treatments at a large tertiary medical center. Survival outcomes were analyzed according to the palliative treatment received prior to disease progression. Results The review identified a total of 272 premenopausal patients meeting study criteria, whose median age was 39 years. Endocrine therapy was the initial treatment in 137 patients (Group 1) with chemotherapy as initial treatment in 135 patients. In the latter group, chemotherapy was continued in 78 patients (Group 2), whereas chemotherapy was switched to endocrine treatment in 57 patients prior to any disease progression (Group 3). Both PFS and OS were significantly longer for chemotherapy-endocrine therapy (median PFS 18.2 months and OS 85.2 months) than for chemotherapy-alone (median PFS 12.6 months and OS 45.5 months) or endocrine therapy-alone (median PFS 7.0 months and OS 57.3 months) (all p values

Genetic diagnosis for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients with the germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation has been emphasized since the development of polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors. Myriad Genetics, Inc.’s (Salt Lake City, UT, USA) companion diagnostics service is almost exclusively used for genetic testing. The aim of this study was to compare the results of germline BRCA mutation tests returned by a local laboratory and those performed by Myriad. Between April 2014 and February 2018, 31 patients with gBRCA 1/2 mutation test results from both Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) and Myriad were enrolled. “Discordant: Opposite classification” was observed for only one among 27 (3.7%). This discrepancy was due to the detection of a deleterious large genomic rearrangement of BRCA 1 by Myriad. Samsung Medical Center performed multiple ligation-dependent probe amplifications (MLPA) to detect large genomic rearrangements only in high-risk patients. This one case was not suspected as high risk and MLPA was not performed. The concordant rate was 74.1% for all 27 patients. “Discordant: Laboratory’s uncertain classification” was found in 22.2% of the sample (six patients). All discrepancies were generated during interpretation of BRCA 2 gene sequencing. Further studies and standardization of genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 genes are required.

Background: The role of chemotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence (iLRR) of breast cancer has not been firmly established after local therapies.Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis to evaluate the clinical implications of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with HER2-negative iLRR.Results: Of a total of 277 patients, 146 (52.7%) received chemotherapy for iLRR. Median follow-up duration was 56.1 months. Eighty-six (31.0%) patients had luminal B-like and 100 (36.1%) had TNBC iLRR. There was a trend of longer disease free survival (DFS) in the chemotherapy group (4-year DFS: 70.4 vs. 59.5%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.45–1.02, log-rank p = 0.059). When adjusted with clinically relevant factors, DFS was significantly prolonged with chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.94, p = 0.023). Subgroup analyses for DFS showed patients with disease free interval (DFI) p = 0.018; adjusted HR = 0.51, p = 0.005, respectively). Regarding the molecular subtypes, a longer DFS with chemotherapy was observed both in luminal B-like (4-year DFS: 77.8 vs. 55.0%, HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.27–0.99, log-rank p = 0.048) and in TNBC patients (4-year DFS: 61.9 vs. 42.8%, HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–1.02, log-rank p = 0.056), but not in luminal A-like.Conclusions: The chemotherapy for iLRR of breast cancer should be individualized for each patient, considering DFI, prior chemotherapy, and molecular subtypes.

Background This study was conducted to collect clinical safety, tolerability, and efficacy data with the use of everolimus (EVE) combined with exemestane (EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods The EVEREXES trial initiated in 2012, provided early access to the first dual blockade treatment with EVE + EXE in patients with HR+, HER2 - ABC in Asia and other emerging growth countries. Postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2 - ABC who had documented recurrence or progression, following a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, were treated with EVE (10 mg/day) + EXE (25 mg/day) orally. Results A total of 235 patients received >= 1 dose of study medication. At the end of the study, all patients ceased the treatment. Disease progression (66.0%) was the primary reason of discontinuation. The most common AEs (>= 20%) were stomatitis, decreased appetite, hyperglycemia, rash, aspartate aminotransferase increased, anemia, alanine aminotransferase increased, cough, and fatigue. No new safety concerns were identified in the current study. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the Asian subset was similar to that of the overall population (9.3 months in both groups). Confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was achieved for 19.6% of the patients. Efficacy of EVE + EXE across subgroups (prior CT, line of treatment, and presence of visceral metastases) was maintained. Conclusion The safety and efficacy results from EVEREXES trial are consistent to data previously reported in BOLERO-2. These results support that EVE + EXE could be a viable treatment option for the postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2 - ABC in Asian region., Novartis Pharma AG, Base, Switzerland; NovartisNovartis, The EVEREXES trial was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Base, Switzerland. Funding for medical editorial support was also provided by Novartis.

Adipocytes are active sources of numerous adipokines that work in both a paracrine and endocrine manner. It is not known that the direct contact between tumor and neighboring fat measured by pretreatment breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) affects treatment outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. A biomarker quantifying the tumor&ndash, fat interface volume from pretreatment MRI was proposed and used to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients treated with NAC. The tumor&ndash, fat interface volume was computed with data-driven clustering using multiphasic MRI. Our approach was developed and validated in two cohorts consisting of 1140 patients. A high tumor&ndash, fat interface volume was significantly associated with a non-pCR in both the development and validation cohorts (p = 0.030 and p = 0.037, respectively). Quantitative measurement of the tumor&ndash, fat interface volume based on pretreatment MRI may be useful for precision medicine and subsequently influence the treatment strategy of patients.

There is limited evidence for effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess whether adjuvant Capecitabine and Cisplatin improve survival compared with surgery only among patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trials conducted at five hospitals in Korea from Mar 2005 to Dec 2018. Patients were eligible if they underwent curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and diagnosed with pathologic T2–3 or N1 stage, according to 6th edition of TNM cancer staging system. Patients who were diagnosed with cervical esophageal cancer, had previous history of cancer, or received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Intervention group received 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d for 14 days and intravenous Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 at Day1, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was disease free survival. Results 136 patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 68) or surgery alone group (n = 68). Seven patients who rejected chemotherapy after randomization were excluded from the final analysis. The cumulative incidence of recurrence within 18 months after surgery was significantly lower in the adjuvant chemotherapy group compared to the surgery alone group (Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.45; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.22–0.91). After long-term follow-up (median 3.3 years, maximum 14 years), disease free survival and overall survival were not different between two groups. (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.49–1.18 and HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55–1.34, respectively.) Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma reduced early recurrence but this does not extend to long-term disease free and overall survival due to limited sample size. Additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample would be necessary to confirm the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: This analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial, which previously demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ribociclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) + endocrine therapy (ET) compared with placebo + ET in pre- and perimenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the EQ-5D-5L were used to evaluate HRQoL. Results: EORTC QLQ-C30 assessments were evaluable for 335 patients in the ribociclib arm and 337 patients in the placebo arm. Adherence rates at baseline and ⩾1 postbaseline time point were 90% and 83%, respectively. Patients treated with ribociclib + ET had a longer time to deterioration (TTD) ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL {hazard ratio (HR), 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52–0.86]}. TTD ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL was delayed in ribociclib-treated patients without versus with disease progression [HR, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.21–0.48)]. TTD ⩾ 10% in pain was longer with ribociclib + ET than with placebo + ET [HR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45–0.92)]. Patients who received a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor experienced similar benefits with ribociclib versus placebo in global HRQoL and pain. Conclusion: HRQoL was maintained longer in patients who received ribociclib + ET versus placebo + ET. These data, combined with previously reported improvements in PFS and OS, support a strong clinical benefit-to-risk ratio with ribociclib-based treatment in pre- and perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC.

Although the introduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-directed therapy including trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancers (mBCs) favorably changed the natural history of this disease, most cases of HER2-positive mBC will eventually progress. Poziotinib is an oral pan-HER kinase inhibitor showing potent activity through irreversible inhibition of these kinases. This open-label, multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poziotinib monotherapy in patients with HER2-positive mBC who had progressed from more than two HER2-directed therapies. Patients received 12 mg poziotinib once daily on a 14-day on/7-day off schedule. Progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated. From April 2015 to February 2016, 106 patients were enrolled in the trial from seven institutes in South Korea. They had a median age of 51 years (range 30-76) and had received a median of four prior therapies including two HER2-directed therapies for advanced or metastatic cancers. The median follow-up duration was 12 months. The median PFS was 4.04 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.94-4.40 months), and median overall survival has not been reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events were (total/grade ≥3) diarrhea (96.23%/14.15%), stomatitis (92.45%/12.26%) and rashes (63.21%/3.77%). Poziotinib showed meaningful activity in these heavily treated HER2-positive mBCs. Diarrhea and stomatitis were the major toxicities. Biomarker studies analyzed are warranted to support further evaluation of this treatment in such cases.

The value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has received increasing attention. In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC, advances in HER2-targeted therapy have not yet clarified the clinical implications of pre-NAC TILs. Likewise, the prognostic role of TILs for long-term survival is not well established. Pre- and post-NAC TIL levels were evaluated in 248 pair-matched pre-NAC biopsy and post-NAC resection samples, and analyzed for predictive and prognostic significance with other clinicopathologic parameters. Additional 60 pre-NAC biopsy samples of HER2-positive BC treated with a TCHP regimen (docetaxel, carboplatin, and a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab) were also assessed. High pre-NAC TILs, clinical nodal stage 0–1 (cN0–1), and negative ER expression were shown to be strong predictive markers for pCR. A nomogram based on these significant clinicopathologic predictors was developed, providing integrated probability of achieving pCR after NAC. The association between high pre-NAC TIL levels and significantly increased pCR rate was also confirmed in HER2-positive BC patients treated with a TCHP regimen. After chemotherapy, increased quantity of post-NAC TILs was shown to have extended BC-specific survival and disease-free survival in univariable and multivariable analyses. High pre-NAC TIL levels were significantly predictive of pCR in BC, and can act as a surrogate marker for predicting therapeutic effects of a TCHP regimen for HER2-positive BC. Post-NAC TILs in residual disease were a new prognostic marker of risk stratification for long-term survival.

Purpose To investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on survival in patients with breast cancer according to tumor subtype, metabolic syndrome, and systemic treatment. Patients and Methods We identified 5668 patients who underwent curative surgery for breast cancer between 1996 and 2013 from the clinical data of a single institution. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and compared between the patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and Results In all patients, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was an unfavorable factor for OS (P = .030) but not for DFS. In the HR+/HER2− subgroup, DFS and OS were longer in patients with BMI Conclusion BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was an unfavorable survival factor, particularly in patients with HR+/HER2− breast cancer.

Purpose PIK3CA mutation is considered to be a possible cause for resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. We investigated the association between PIK3CA mutations and the outcome of NAC in HER2-positive breast cancers. Methods A total of 100 HER2-positive breast cancer patients who had undergone NAC and surgery between 2004 and 2016 were examined. Mutation status was sequentially assessed in pre-NAC, post-NAC, and recurrent specimens taken from these patients. Results PIK3CA mutations were identified in the sequential specimens of 17 patients (17.0%). These 17 patients experienced shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than the rest of the patients (58.3 months vs. 119.3 months, p=0.020); however, there was no significant difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) (pCR, 17.6% vs. 33.7%, p=0.191; OS, 84.5 months vs. 118.0 months, p=0.984). While there was no difference in pCR between the wild-type and mutant PIK3CA groups in pre-NAC specimens (25.0% vs. 31.8%, p=0.199), PIK3CA mutations correlated with lower pCR in post-NAC specimens (0.0% vs. 24.3%, p

Background: In MONALEESA-2, ribociclib plus letrozole showed improved progression-free survival compared with letrozole alone as first-line treatment for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer. MONALEESA-7 aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with advanced, HR-positive breast cancer. Methods: This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done at 188 centres in 30 countries. Eligible patients were premenopausal women aged 18–59 years who had histologically or cytologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria, or at least one predominantly lytic bone lesion; and had not received previous treatment with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors. Endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting was permitted, as was up to one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology to receive oral ribociclib (600 mg/day on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule) or matching placebo with either oral tamoxifen (20 mg daily) or a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (letrozole 2·5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg, both oral, daily), all with goserelin (3·6 mg administered subcutaneously on day 1 of every 28-day cycle). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat, and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. MONALEESA-7 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02278120 and is ongoing, but no longer enrolling patients. Findings: Between Dec 17, 2014, and Aug 1, 2016, 672 patients were randomly assigned: 335 to the ribociclib group and 337 to the placebo group. Per investigator's assessment, median progression-free survival was 23·8 months (95% CI 19·2–not reached) in the ribociclib group compared with 13·0 months (11·0–16·4) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·55, 95% CI 0·44–0·69; p

The new eighth edition TNM classification by the AJCC for breast cancer (BC) incorporates biologic factors and gene expression prognostic panels, in addition to traditional anatomic factors. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of this new staging system compared to the previous AJCC 7th edition staging system. We conducted a retrospective analysis of women with stage I, II, or III BC who underwent curative surgery with/without adjuvant systemic therapy at Samsung Medical Center between July 2004 and December 2008. Of 3,208 BCs, this study was analyzed using the information of 2,790 BC patients. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)− BCs were observed in 62.9% of BCs, HR+/ HER2+ in 9.3%, HR−/HER2− in 17.0%, and HR−/HER2+ in 10.8%. In survival analysis, we observed 245 distant recurrences and 198 deaths caused by BC progression. The median follow-up duration was 116.2 months. 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates according to the AJCC 7th edition criteria were 97.2% of stage IA, 100% of IB, 94.9% of IIA, 87.9% of IIB, 86.4% of IIIA, 95.7% of IIIB, and 65.7% of IIIC (p

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers of cardiac damages, such as troponin T (TnT) and the amino-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), may be useful as early predictors of cardiac dysfunction. The role of these biomarkers in patients receiving lapatinib and/or trastuzumab before anthracyclines is unknown. This study explores TnT and NT-proBNP as predictors of early cardiac toxicity in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. METHODS:This sub-study of the NEOALTTO trial tested if changes in the levels of TnT and NT-proBNP occurred after 2weeks of anti-HER2 therapy (lapatinib, trastuzumab or their combination) alone and/or after 18weeks of anti-HER2 therapy plus weekly paclitaxel. RESULTS:173 and 172 were tested at all three timepoints for NT-proBNP and TnT, respectively. The incidence of biomarker elevation was overall low at all timepoints for all the three treatment arms. A total of 13 CEs in 11 patients occurred. Biomarker elevations in patients with CEs were very rare; only one patient with subsequent CE had a NT-proBNP elevation at baseline and at week 2. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TnT and proBNP may not be useful as early predictors of cardiac toxicity in anthracycline-naïve patients receiving trastuzumab and/or lapatinib.

Simple Summary Exosomes and cytokines play crucial roles in the process of tumor progression. Recent studies have reported that cytokines can be packaged into exosomes, leading to drug resistance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential value of cytokines in both serum and exosomes as prognostic biomarkers of long-term outcomes in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We observed significant differences in expression patterns between serum cytokines and exosomal cytokines. Elevated levels of serum IP-10, serum MMP-1, and exosomal NGF were associated with poor overall survival. In multivariate analysis, exosomal NGF was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. These findings suggest that exosomal NGF is useful for identifying patients with poor survival outcomes. Abstract Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). However, there are no established predictors of chemosensitivity and survival in LABC patients who undergo NAC. Many studies have demonstrated that exosomes and cytokines are important players in intercellular communication between tumors and their environments, and are involved in chemotherapy resistance. Recently, it was reported that cytokines can be packaged into exosomes, but whether exosomal cytokines serve as biomarkers in breast cancer patients is still unclear. In this study, we examined the roles of cytokines in both serum and exosomes as prognostic biomarkers for long-term outcomes in patients with breast cancer who undergo NAC. We isolated exosomes from the blood of 129 patients with early breast cancer who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2008 and 2011 at Samsung Medical Center. The levels of cytokines and growth factors in serum and exosomes were measured with ProcartaPlex immune-related panels. We investigated correlations between clinic-pathologic variables and patient survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for prognostic evaluation. We detected significant differences in expression patterns between serum cytokines and exosomal cytokines. In both serum and exosomes, many cytokines were positively correlated with age. In univariate analysis, patients with high serum IP-10, serum MMP-1, and exosomal NGF had shorter overall survival. Exosomal NGF showed significantly poorer overall survival in multivariate analysis. These findings suggest that exosomal NGF is useful for identifying patients with poor survival outcomes.

Accurate detection of genomic alterations using high-throughput sequencing is an essential component of precision cancer medicine. We characterize the variant allele fractions (VAFs) of somatic single nucleotide variants and indels across 5095 clinical samples profiled using a custom panel, CancerSCAN. Our results demonstrate that a significant fraction of clinically actionable variants have low VAFs, often due to low tumor purity and treatment-induced mutations. The percentages of mutations under 5% VAF across hotspots in EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF are 16%, 11%, 12%, and 10%, respectively, with 24% for EGFR T790M and 17% for PIK3CA E545. For clinical relevance, we describe two patients for whom targeted therapy achieved remission despite low VAF mutations. We also characterize the read depths necessary to achieve sensitivity and specificity comparable to current laboratory assays. These results show that capturing low VAF mutations at hotspots by sufficient sequencing coverage and carefully tuned algorithms is imperative for a clinical assay., High-throughput sequencing is used to identify somatic variants in cancer patients. Here, the authors perform panel-based profiling of 5095 clinical samples and demonstrate that many clinically-actionable variants have low variant allele fractions, requiring assays with high detection sensitivity.

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in Asians with endocrine therapy–resistant metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods The Palbociclib Ongoing Trials in the Management of Breast Cancer 3 (PALOMA-3) trial, a double-blind phase III study, included 521 patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer with disease progression on endocrine therapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed on study treatment and at the end of treatment. Results This preplanned subgroup analysis of the PALOMA-3 study included premenopausal and postmenopausal Asians taking palbociclib plus fulvestrant (n = 71) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 31). Palbociclib plus fulvestrant improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with fulvestrant alone. Median PFS was not reached with palbociclib plus fulvestrant (95% CI, 9.2 months to not reached) but was 5.8 months with placebo plus fulvestrant (95% CI, 3.5 to 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.485; 95% CI, 0.270 to 0.869; P = .0065). The most common all-cause grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the palbociclib arm were neutropenia (92%) and leukopenia (29%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 4.1% of patients. Within-patient mean trough concentration comparisons across subgroups indicated similar palbociclib exposure between Asians and non-Asians. Global quality of life was maintained; no statistically significant changes from baseline were observed for patient-reported outcome scores with palbociclib plus fulvestrant. Conclusion This is the first report, to our knowledge, showing that palbociclib plus fulvestrant improves PFS in asian patients. Palbociclib plus fulvestrant was well tolerated in this study.

BackgroundPatients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear. MethodsWe randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival. ResultsThe result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease-free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% ...

Purpose Eribulin mesilate was approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC), who had received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane. On the other hand, the efficacy and safety information of eribulin in Korean patients is limited by the lack of clinical trials. Materials and methods In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV study, locally advanced or MBC patients were enrolled between June 2013 and April 2014 from 14 centers in Korea. One point four mg/m2 dose of eribulin was administered on days 1 and 8 of every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the frequency and intensity of the treatment emergent adverse event. The secondary endpoint was the disease control rate, which included the rate of complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease. Results A total of 101 patients received at least one dose of eribulin and were included in the safety set. The patients received a total of 543 treatment cycles, with a median of three cycles (range, 1 to 31 cycles). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (91.1% of patients, 48.3% of cycles). The frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, decrease in appetite, fatigue/asthenia, and myalgia/arthralgia. The peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 27 patients (26.7%), including grade 3 in two patients. Disease control rate was 52.7% and 51.3% of patients in the full analysis set and per-protocol set, respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated the feasible safety profile and activity of eribulin in Korean patients with MBC.

Aim The aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of TSU-68 would affect on the quality of life (QOL) of Korean metastatic breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel. Methods Sixty-three of 78 patients completed the baseline QOL questionnaires and at least one follow-up questionnaire comprising questions from the Korean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD), the shortened form of the profile of mood states (BPOMS), and anticipation and anxiety for treatment scale. Changes in QOL scores from baseline were compared by analysis of covariance at each time point (6, 12 weeks, 9, 12 and 18 months) and at the end of treatment (EOT), and the longitudinal changes over time were evaluated by repeated measure analysis. Results The two-treatment groups (TSU-68 plus docetaxel [A] vs docetaxel alone [B]) were well balanced regarding sociodemographic characteristics, including age (P = 0.450), religion (P = 1.000), education (P = 0.257), ECOG performance status (P = 0.261), and employment status (P = 0.325). The return rate at EOT was 61.9%. In analyses at each QOL measuring time, A group showed a higher FACT-B total score and FACT-G score than B at 12 months (P = 0.031 and P = 0.024, respectively). The anticipation and anxiety for treatment scale of A group was higher than that of B at 12 weeks and EOT (P = 0.046 and P = 0.022, respectively). However, repeated measure analysis for longitudinal changes over time showed no significant group wise differences. Conclusions The combination of TSU-68 with docetaxel showed no additional adverse effects on patient QOL during the study period, as compared with docetaxel monotherapy.

Summary Background Endocrine treatment is recommended by clinical guidelines as the preferred treatment option for premenopausal as well as postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. In real-world clinical practice, however, a substantial number of patients are treated with chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the clinical antitumour activity and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy with that of capecitabine chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was done in 14 academic institutions in South Korea. Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 were included. One line of previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was allowed. Patients were randomly assigned, using a random permuted block design (with a block size of two), to receive palbociclib plus combination endocrine therapy (oral exemestane 25 mg per day for 28 days and oral palbociclib 125 mg per day for 21 days every 4 weeks plus leuprolide 3·75 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy (oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks every 3 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and visceral metastasis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population that excluded patients who did not receive study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02592746 , and is ongoing for follow-up of overall survival. Findings Between June 15, 2016, and Dec 10, 2018, 189 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 were randomly assigned to the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group (n=92) or the capecitabine group (n=92). Six patients in the capecitabine group withdrew from the study before drug administration; therefore, 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 86 patients in the capecitabine group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses. 46 (50%) of 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 45 (51%) of 92 in the capecitabine group were treatment naive for metastatic breast cancer. During a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 9–22), median progression-free survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 14·2–21·8) in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group versus 14·4 months (12·1–17·0) in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 0·659 [95% CI 0·437–0·994], one-sided log-rank p=0·0235). Treatment-related grade 3 or worse neutropenia was more common in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group than in the capecitabine group (69 [75%] of 92 vs 14 [16%] of 86 patients). 2 (2%) patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 15 (17%) patients in the capecitabine group had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation Exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression showed clinical benefit compared with capecitabine in terms of improved progression-free survival in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian suppression is an active treatment option in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who have been pretreated with tamoxifen. Funding Pfizer, Shinpoong, and Daewoong Korea and Takeda.

PURPOSE We evaluated the clinical features and outcomes of invasive breast cancer (BC) among different age groups by analyzing a modern BC registry including subtypes and treatment information. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 6,405 women aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed stage I, II, or III BC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant therapy at a university-based hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between January 2003 and December 2011. The study end point was all-cause mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards models and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs calculated after adjusting for age, body mass index, stage, subtype, and treatment, including type of surgery and use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and targeted therapy. RESULTS During 36,360 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up: 5.45 years; interquartile range, 4.3-7.1), 256 deaths were reported (mortality rate, 7.0/1,000 person-years). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was higher in patients older than 40 years (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.87) and older than 60 years (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.63 to 3.39) than in patients aged 40 to 49 years. Across age groups, advanced stage at diagnosis, luminal type as well as triple-negative BC, and not receiving adjuvant treatment were associated with increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSION A strong J-shaped relationship was observed between age and mortality, indicating worse clinical outcomes in young and old patients. This study suggested a possible benefit of personalized BC screening examination and precise and active treatment strategies to reduce BC-related mortality.

PURPOSE In PALOMA-2, palbociclib plus letrozole significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) as initial treatment of estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer. We assessed the benefit of palbociclib plus letrozole in Asians. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of 666 enrolled postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (no prior treatment of advanced disease), 95 were Asian. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, and safety. RESULTS Median PFS was significantly longer in Asian patients who received palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole (25.7 months [95% CI, 19.2 months to not estimable] v 13.9 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 22.0 months]; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87; P = .007). The most common toxicities with palbociclib were hematologic and more frequent among Asians versus non-Asians: neutropenia (any grade, 95.4% v 76.8%; grade 3/4, 89.2% v 62.5%), leukopenia (43.1% v 38.3%; 32.3% v 23.5%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7% v 13.5%; 4.6% v 1.1%). No Asians had febrile neutropenia. Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were similar among Asian and non-Asian patients who received palbociclib plus letrozole (10.8% and 9.5%). In Asians, quality of life (QOL) was maintained with no significant differences observed between treatments from baseline in breast cancer–specific QOL and general health status scores. Change from baseline in EuroQol five dimensions index scores was significantly higher with palbociclib plus letrozole (0.013 v –0.069; P = .0132). Geometric mean palbociclib trough concentration values were higher in Asians versus non-Asians (93.8 v 61.7 ng/mL). CONCLUSION Consistent with the overall study population, the addition of palbociclib to letrozole significantly improved PFS in Asians. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent in Asians versus non-Asians but manageable with early dose modifications while maintaining QOL.

Tumor genetic heterogeneity may underlie poor clinical outcomes because diverse subclones could be comprised of metastatic and drug resistant cells. Targeted deep sequencing has been used widely as a diagnostic tool to identify actionable mutations in cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of estimating tumor heterogeneity using targeted panel sequencing data. We investigated the prognostic impact of a tumor heterogeneity (TH) index on clinical outcomes, using mutational profiles from targeted deep sequencing data acquired from 1,352 patients across 8 cancer types. The TH index tended to be increased in high pathological stage disease in several cancer types, indicating clonal expansion of cancer cells as tumor progression proceeds. In colorectal cancer patients, TH index values also correlated significantly with clinical prognosis. Integration of the TH index with genomic and clinical features could improve the power of risk prediction for clinical outcomes. In conclusion, deep sequencing to determine the TH index could serve as a promising prognostic indicator in cancer patients.

Background As a large-scale study of Koreans, we evaluated the association between BRCA mutation and the prevalence of non-breast and ovary cancers in first- and second-degree relatives of high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods We organized familial pedigrees of 2555 patients with breast cancer who underwent genetic screening for BRCA1/2 in Samsung Medical Center between January 2002 and May 2018. Families with a member that had a history of cancer other than of the breast or ovary were regarded positive for other primary cancer. Results The median age of the population was 40 years (range, 19 to 82 years). BRCA mutation was detected in 377 (14.8%) of the patients. The BRCA-positive group had a higher frequency of family history of breast or ovarian cancer (p

Background In the phase 3 MARIANNE trial, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with or without pertuzumab showed noninferior progression-free survival and better tolerability than trastuzumab plus a taxane (HT) for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer. This article reports the final descriptive overall survival (OS) analysis, updated safety data, and additional patient-reported outcomes and biomarker analyses. Methods OS was assessed in 1095 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and no prior therapy for advanced disease who had been randomized to HT, T-DM1 plus a placebo (hereafter T-DM1), or T-DM1 plus pertuzumab (T-DM1+pertuzumab). A post hoc exploratory landmark analysis of OS, baseline patient and disease characteristics, and tumor biomarkers in patients with and without an objective tumor response (OR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors within 6.5 months of randomization was conducted. Results The median OS was similar across groups (50.9, 53.7, and 51.8 months for the HT, T-DM1, and T-DM1+pertuzumab groups, respectively). Among patients with an OR, the median OS was longer with T-DM1 (64.4 months) and T-DM1+pertuzumab (not reached) versus HT (56.3 months). No baseline characteristics or biomarkers were strongly associated with OR. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was greater with HT (55.8%) than T-DM1 (47.1%) or T-DM1+pertuzumab (48.6%). The median time to clinically meaningful deterioration (a 3-point or greater change) in neurotoxicity symptoms was shorter with HT (2.1 months) and T-DM1+pertuzumab (4.2 months) than T-DM1 (6.2 months). Fewer patients reported alopecia and diarrhea and were bothered by treatment side effects in the T-DM1 arm. Conclusions These results support T-DM1 as a first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who are deemed unsuitable for taxane-based therapy.

1026 Background: The Federation of Asian Clinical Oncology (FACO) conducted an international retrospective cohort study of oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) (OLIGO-BC1) (UMIN No.000030047). At ASCO2020, we demonstrated that locoregional and systemic therapy prolonged overall survival (OS) for patients with oligometastatic BC, especially for cases with some type of systemic therapy, younger age, ECOG performance status 0, stage I BC, non-triple negative subtype, fewer metastatic sites, local recurrence and longer disease-free interval from a multivariate analysis (#1025). Although BC is heterogeneous and a retrospective dataset has many kinds of bias, we attempted a subset analysis based on intrinsic subtype and several prognostic factors. Methods: Oligometastatic BC patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2012 were registered from CSCO, KSMO and JSCO. OS period was measured from the diagnosis of oligometastases to the latest follow-up. ER, PgR and HER2 status were determined by immunohistochemistry and/or in situ hybridization. A hazard ratio (HR) of OS was calculated by using a univariate analysis. Results: In 1200 eligible cases, one oligometastatic site was found in 578 cases, two in 289, three in 154, four in 102 and five in 77. Bone metastases were recorded in 301 cases, visceral metastases in 387, locoregional recurrence in 25, local recurrence in 83 and multiple metastatic sites in 404. Luminal subtype was recorded in 526 cases (44%), luminal-HER2 in 189 (16%), HER2 in 154 (13%), triple-negative in 166 (14%) and others in 165 (13%). In any subtype, locoregional and systemic therapy and ECOG performance status 0 were beneficial for OS. Stage I BC, one oligometastatic site and longer disease-free interval were also related to favorable prognosis in luminal and HER2 subtype. However, triple-negative subtype had no survival advantage with these 3 factors. On the other hand, pathological negative or micrometastatic lymph nodes at primary BC and one oligometastatic site of lymph node, lung, liver and bone were favorable prognostic factors. In addition, cases treated locally with surgical resection and conventional radiation therapy were expected to prolong OS. Discussions: Locoregional therapy for oligometastatic BC may be considered in luminal and HER2 subtype with some conditions. As reported in ASCO2020, triple-negative BC should be managed with systemic therapy. Conclusions: Oligometastatic BC is diagnosed by chance, but some cases seem to survive with multidisciplinary treatment. It is worthwhile to consider locoregional therapy in oligometastatic BC after evaluating favorable prognostic factors.

Background monarchE is a phase 3, open-label study evaluating abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) compared to ET alone in patients with node positive, HR+, HER2-, high risk early breast cancer (EBC) that resulted in a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) at a pre-planned interim analysis. Following the positive interim analysis, patients continued to be followed for IDFS, distant recurrence, and overall survival. Methods After surgery and, as indicated, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, 5,637 patients with HR+, HER2-, high risk EBC were randomized (1:1) to standard of care adjuvant ET with or without abemaciclib (150 mg BD for 2 years). Patients with ≥4 positive nodes, or 1-3 nodes and either grade 3 disease, tumor size ≥5 cm, or central Ki-67 ≥20% were eligible. Here we present results of the primary outcome IDFS analysis which was planned after approximately 390 IDFS events. Results At the primary outcome analysis, median follow-up was approximately 19 months in both arms (an increase of 3.5 months from the interim analysis). A total of 1437 (25.5%) patients had completed the 2-year treatment period; 3281 (58.2%) were still in the 2-year treatment period. With 395 IDFS events observed in the intent-to-treat population, abemaciclib plus ET continued to demonstrate superior IDFS versus ET alone, with a 28.7% reduction in the risk of developing invasive disease (p=.0009; HR = 0.713; 95% CI = 0.583, 0.871). Two-year IDFS rates were 92.3% in the abemaciclib plus ET arm and 89.3% in the ET alone arm. There was a consistent benefit of abemaciclib in all prespecified subgroups. The addition of abemaciclib to ET also resulted in an improvement in distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). Overall survival was immature at the time of analysis. A key secondary endpoint was efficacy in patients with centrally assessed high Ki-67 (≥20%) (Ki-67H) (n=2498). Disease characteristics were well balanced between the arms of this population. Abemaciclib plus ET demonstrated superior IDFS vs ET alone, with a 30.9% reduction in risk of developing invasive disease (p=.0111; HR = 0.691; 95% CI = 0.519, 0.920) and 2-year IDFS rates of 91.6% and 87.1%, respectively. An improvement in DRFS treatment effect was also observed in the Ki-67H population. At the time of data cutoff, the median treatment duration of abemaciclib was 17.3 months and the median duration of ET was balanced between the arms (18.3 months in the abemaciclib arm and 18.7 months in the ET alone arm). Safety was consistent with the results at the interim IDFS analysis and with the known safety profile of abemaciclib. Conclusions At the primary outcome analysis, with a median follow-up of approximately 19 months, abemaciclib combined with ET continued to demonstrate a clinically meaningful improvement in IDFS in patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high risk, EBC with a statistically significant improvement in IDFS in patients with central Ki-67 ≥20%. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03155997 Table 1: PrimaryOutcome EfficacyIntent-to-Treat PopulationIntent-to-Treat PopulationKi-67 ≥20% (Ki-67H) PopulationKi-67 ≥20% (Ki-67H) PopulationEndpointAbemaciclib + ET N=2808ET alone N=2829Abemaciclib + ET N=1262ET alone N=1236IDFS# events, n (%)163 (5.8)232 (8.2)82 (6.5)115 (9.3)log rank P value, HR (95% CI)p=.0009 0.713 (0.583, 0.871)p=.0111 0.691 (0.519, 0.920)Rate (%) at 2 years (95% CI)92.3 (90.9, 93.5)89.3 (87.7, 90.7)91.6 (89.4, 93.4)87.1 (84.3, 89.5)Difference (%) in 2-year rates (95% CI)3 (1.1, 5.0)4.5 (1.2, 7.7)DRFS# events, n (%)131 (4.7)193 (6.8)65 (5.2)102 (8.3)log rank P value, HR (95% CI)p=.0009 0.687 (0.551, 0.858)0.609 (0.445, 0.833)Rate (%) at 2 years (95% CI)93.8 (92.6, 94.9)90.8 (89.3, 92.1)93.6 (91.6, 95.1)88.5 (85.7, 90.7)Difference (%) in 2-year rates (95%CI)3 (1.2, 4.8)5.1 (2.1, 8.1) Citation Format: Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Stephen Johnston, Nadia Harbeck, Masakazu Toi, Young-Hyuck Im, Mattea Reinisch, Zhimin Shao, Pirkko Liisa Kellokumpu Lehtinen, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Alexey Tryakin, Matthew Goetz, Hope S Rugo, Elzbieta Senkus, Laura Testa, Michael Andersson, Kenji Tamura, Guenther G. Steger, Lucia Del Mastro, Joanne Cox, Tammy Forrester, Sarah Sherwood, Xuelin Li, Ran Wei, Miguel Martin, Priya Rastogi. Primary outcome analysis of invasive disease-free survival for monarchE: abemaciclib combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy for high risk early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-01.

Aim We evaluated the tumor response and clinical outcomes according to molecular subtypes in stage II–III breast cancer patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery and radiotherapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 329 patients with clinical stage II–III breast cancer who received NAC followed by surgery and radiotherapy. Luminal A and B, HER2-enriched and triple-negative subgroups were identified. Results The overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after NAC was 20.1% and the HER2-enriched subgroup had the highest pCR rate (43.6%), whereas luminal A showed the lowest rate of pCR (4.6%). The median follow-up duration was 55 months (range, 5–98 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 88.9% and 72.9%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, according to the pathologic response (pCR vs non-pCR), the triple-negative subtype exhibited a significant difference in 5-year OS rate (100.0% vs 71.6%, P = 0.005) and 5-year DFS rate (93.1% vs 55.1%, P < 0.001). A distinct survival difference according to molecular subtype was found, particularly in the non-pCR group (5-year OS and DFS, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions The non-pCR group showed significantly decreased 5-year OS and DFS rates compared to the pCR group, especially in triple negative and HER2-enriched breast cancer patients. A significant difference in survival rates and molecular subtypes was found in patients who failed to attain pCR.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the tumor characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant treatments after surgery with a curative aim for patients with breast cancer who are 65 years and older. Materials and Methods Patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2009 were analyzed (n=4,388). Tumor characteristics and survival outcome were compared by dividing the patients into two age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years old). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for comparison of survival rates by log-rank test, and a Cox regression model was used to examine the effect of variables. Results Among 4,388 patients with invasive breast cancer, 317 patients (7.2%) were 65 years or older and the median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Tumor characteristics were similar between the two age groups, but the older patients were treated less often with adjuvant treatments. During a median follow-up period of 122 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was equivalent for patients 65 years and older compared to younger patients, but significantly worse in overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) (5-year OS, 94.3% vs. 90.5%; p < 0.001 and 5-year BCSS, 94.7% vs. 91.8%; p=0.031). In the multivariate model, age ≥ 65 years old was identified as an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. Conclusion Elderly breast cancer appeared to have worse outcomes with very low prevalence in Korea, despite similar tumor characteristics. More active adjuvant therapies would have a role for aggressive subtypes for fit, elderly patients.

This multi-center, randomized, phase III study was conducted to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-3031 compared with daily filgrastim in patients during the first cycle of chemotherapy for breast cancer in terms of the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN). Seventy-four patients with breast cancer who were receiving combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) were enrolled. All participants were randomized to receive either daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 100 μg/m2/day for up to 10 days or a single subcutaneous injection of DA-3031 at fixed doses of 6 mg on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle. The mean duration of grade 4 (G4) neutropenia in cycle 1 was 2.08 ± 0.85 days for the filgrastim group and 2.28 ± 1.14 days for the DA-3031 group. The difference between groups was 0.2 ± 1.10 days (95 % confidence interval (CI) = −0.26, 0.66), which supported non-inferiority. No statistically significant differences were observed in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (154.34/mm3 and 161.75/mm3 for the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively; P = 0.8414) or in time to ANC recovery (10.03 ± 0.75 and 9.83 ± 1.56 days in the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively; P = 0.0611) during cycle 1. Serious AEs occurred in six (15.8 %) patients receiving filgrastim and in ten (27.8 %) patients receiving DA-3031; however, none was determined to be related to the study drug. DA-3031 and daily filgrastim are similar in regard to DSN and safety in breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.

Background Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T) improves outcomes for metastatic human epidermal growth factor 2–positive breast cancer and increases the pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting, but their role as adjuvant therapy remains uncertain. Methods In the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial, patients with centrally confirmed human epidermal growth factor 2–positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 year of adjuvant therapy with T, L, their sequence (T→L), or their combination (L+T). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), with 850 events required for 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 for L+T versus T. Results Between June 2007 and July 2011, 8,381 patients were enrolled. In 2011, due to futility to demonstrate noninferiority of L versus T, the L arm was closed, and patients free of disease were offered adjuvant T. A protocol modification required P ≤ .025 for the two remaining pairwise comparisons. At a protocol-specified analysis with a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a 16% reduction in the DFS hazard rate was observed with L+T compared with T (555 DFS events; HR, 0.84; 97.5% CI, 0.70 to 1.02; P = .048), and a 4% reduction was observed with T→L compared with T (HR, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; P = .61). L-treated patients experienced more diarrhea, cutaneous rash, and hepatic toxicity compared with T-treated patients. The incidence of cardiac toxicity was low in all treatment arms. Conclusion Adjuvant treatment that includes L did not significantly improve DFS compared with T alone and added toxicity. One year of adjuvant T remains standard of care.