Search

Background: The Irish General Practitioner Training (GP) Programme is currently moving to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), facilitated by Programmatic Assessment (PA) and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). These new assessment and feedback mechanisms may provide a rich and much sought-after dataset. However, given the possible number of feedback and assessment events, and the variety of modalities used, aggregating and interpreting these can be costly and difficult. Dashboard implementations (DI) have been purposed as a solution to bridge the gap between the large datasets and the training community at all levels., Aims: To explore the Irish GP training community's perceptions on how an EPAs DI could facilitate the delivery of GP training in Ireland., Methods: A qualitative approach was taken, using a focus group representative of different groups in the training community. Concurrently, an EPAs DI was developed. Focus group transcripts were analysed in an iterative fashion using Template Analysis to generate themes and subthemes., Results: Numerous advantages were seen in relation to the implementation of an EPAs DI around entrustment decisions, constructive alignment and summative decision-making. These advantages, however, need to be tempered with the realisation that the EPAs DI is not and should not be misinterpreted as being the learning analytic panacea for GP training., Conclusion: This paper outlines the perceptions from a postgraduate medical education training community on an EPAs DI, which would be applicable to other training communities considering introducing similar mechanisms.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs), as a focus of learner assessment, are supported by validity evidence. An EPA is a unit of professional practice requiring proficiency in multiple competencies simultaneously, that can be entrusted to a sufficiently competent learner. Taken collectively, a set of EPAs define and inform the curriculum of a specialty training. The goal of this study was to develop a set of EPAs for Dutch PICU fellows. A multistage methodology was employed incorporating sequential input from task force members, a medical education expert, PICU fellowship program directors, and PICU physicians and fellows via a modified three-round Delphi study. In the first modified Delphi round, experts rated indispensability and clarity of preliminary EPAs. In the subsequent rounds, aggregated scores for each EPA and group comments were provided. In round two, respondents rated indispensability and clarity of revised EPAs. Round three was used to gain explicit confirmation of suitability to implement these EPAs. Based on median ratings and content validity index (CVI) analysis for indispensability in the first two rounds, all nine preliminary EPAs covered activities that were deemed essential to the clinical practice of PICU physicians. Based on median ratings and CVI analysis for clarity however, four EPAs needed revision. With an agreement percentage of 93-100% for all individual EPAs as well as the set as a whole, a high degree of consensus among experts was reached in the third round. The resulting nine PICU EPAs provide a succinct overview of the core tasks of Dutch PICU physicians. These EPAs were created as an essential first step towards developing an assessment system for PICU fellows, grounded in core professional activities. The robust methodology used, may have broad applicability for other (sub)specialty training programs aiming to develop specialty specific EPAs., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.