Search

Objective: Hematoma expansion (HE) is the most important therapeutic target during acute care of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Imaging biomarkers such as non-contrast CT (NCCT) markers have been associated with increasing risk for HE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of NCCT markers with functional long-term outcome and with HE in patients with deep (basal ganglia and thalamus) ICH who represent an important subgroup of patients at the highest risk for functional deterioration with HE due to the eloquence of the affected brain region. Methods: From our prospective institutional database, all patients maximally treated with deep ICH were included and retrospectively analyzed. NCCT markers were recorded at diagnostic imaging, ICH volume characteristics were volumetrically evaluated, and all patients received follow-up imaging within 0-48 h. We explored associations of NCCT makers with unfavorable functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin scale 4-6, after 12 months and with HE. Bias and confounding were addressed by multivariable regression modeling. Results: In 322 patients with deep ICH, NCCT markers were distributed as follows: irregular shape: 69.6%, heterogenous density: 55.9%, hypodensities: 52.5%, island sign: 19.3%, black hole sign: 11.5%, and blend sign: 4.7%. Upon multivariable regression analyses, independent associations were documented with the functional outcome for irregular shape (aOR: 2.73, 95%CI: 1.42-5.22, p = 0.002), heterogenous density (aOR: 2.62, 95%CI: 1.40-4.90, p = 0.003) and island sign (aOR: 2.54, 95%CI: 1.05-6.14, p = 0.038), and with HE for heterogenous density (aOR: 5.01, 95%CI: 1.93-13.05, p = 0.001) and hypodensities (aOR: 3.75, 95%CI: 1.63-8.62, p = 0.002). Conclusion: NCCT markers are frequent in deep ICH patients and provide important clinical implications. Specifically, markers defined by diverging intrahematomal densities provided associations with a 5-times higher risk for HE and a 2.5-times higher likelihood for unfavorable functional long-term outcome. Hence, these markers allow the identification of patients with deep ICH at high risk for clinical deterioration due to HE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prevention of hematoma enlargement in oral anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (OAC-ICH) focuses on blood pressure (BP) reduction and OAC reversal. We investigated whether treatment efficiency and clinical outcomes differ between OAC-ICH patients admitted outside versus during regular working hours. Methods: Based on pooled data of multicenter cohort studies, we grouped OAC-ICH patients (vitamin K antagonist [VKA], non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant [NOAC]) according to on- vs. off-hour admission. Primary outcome was the functional outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) dichotomized into favorable (mRS 0–3) and unfavorable (mRS 4–6) and mortality at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of hematoma enlargement, the proportions of patients with systolic BP <140 mm Hg and with anticoagulation treatment achieving international normalized ratio (INR) levels <1.3 at 4 h. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for imbalances in baseline characteristics. Results: The study population consisted of 76/126 NOAC-ICH patients and 1,005/1,470 VKA patients presenting during off-hours. Functional outcome and mortality rates were not significantly different among PSM patients with VKA-ICH and NOAC-ICH during on- vs. off-hours (mRS 4–6 VKA-ICH: on-hour: 239/357 [66.9%] vs. 253/363 [69.7%] off-hour; p = 0.43; NOAC-ICH: on-hour 26/42 [61.9%] vs. off-hour: 37/57 [64.9%]; p = 0.76; mRS 6 VKA-ICH: on-hour: 127/357 [35.6%] vs. off-hour: 148/363 [40.8%]; p = 0.15; -NOAC-ICH: on-hour 17/42 [40.5%] vs. off-hour: 16/57 [28.1%]; p = 0.20). There were no differences detectable regarding the secondary outcome measures (i.e., hematoma enlargement, the proportion of patients who achieved systolic BP levels <140 mm Hg at 4 h as well as anticoagulation treatment achieving INR levels <1.3 at 4 h) in OAC patients. Conclusion: Our study implies that BP reduction and anticoagulation reversal management are well established and associated with similar rates of hematoma enlargement and clinical outcomes in on- vs. off-hour admitted OAC-ICH patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whether time of hospital admission-during or outside regular working hours-affects functional outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unestablished as previous analyses have focused on mortality only. We here investigate whether on- versus off-hour hospital admission in ICH is associated with levels of invasiveness and clinical outcomes.Methods: Based on the UKER registry (NCT03183167) we grouped ICH-patients according to on- versus off-hour hospital admission. Primary outcome measures was functional outcome after 3 months using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) dichotomized into favorable (mRS = 0-3) and unfavorable (mRS = 4-6). Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for baseline imbalances, and subgroup analyses were performed to explore associations of on- versus off-hour admission with invasiveness of therapeutic interventions.Results: A total of 438/1269 (34.5%) of ICH-patients were admitted during regular working hours. Mortality rates were not significantly different among patients with on- versus off-hour admission. On-hour patients showed a significantly larger proportion of patients with favorable outcome (on-hour: mRS = 0-3 after 3 months: 176/416 (42.3%) versus off-hour: 265/784 (33.8%); P = .004). Analysis of invasive therapeutic interventions revealed that likelihood of favorable outcome was significantly increased among on-hour admitted patients who did not require neurosurgical interventions (no external ventricular drain n = 349, OR: 1.67[1.13-2.48], P < .05; no hematoma evacuation surgery n = 423, OR: 1.51[1.07-2.14], P < .05).Conclusion: This study verified an "off-hour effect" in ICH that relates to functional outcome, rather than mortality, and which may be linked to different levels of invasive therapeutic interventions in patients admitted during off-hour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]