Search

Precis: We investigated changes of intraocular pressure (IOP) according to eye gaze. IOP was significantly elevated in adduction, abduction, and supraduction. However, there was no significant difference between glaucoma and control groups., Purpose: We assessed changes in IOP according to eye gaze and identified their correlations with various risk factors of glaucoma., Patients and Methods: In this prospective observational study that included 56 glaucoma patients and 34 healthy participants, we measured IOP in the primary position with a Goldmann applanation tonometry and rebound tonometer. Then, this IOP was measured in abduction, adduction, supraduction using a rebound tonometer. IOP changes according to eye gaze were measured based on the baseline IOP, and IOP changes between glaucoma and the control groups were compared. Correlations between IOP changes and risk factors of glaucoma were evaluated., Results: The baseline IOP was not significantly different between glaucoma and the control groups. Compared with the IOP in the primary position, a significant increase in IOP was 2.3±2.7 mm Hg during abduction (P<0.0001), 0.7±2.7 mm Hg during adduction (P<0.0001), and 1.2±2.8 mm Hg during supraduction (P<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the amount of IOP elevation or the ratio of IOP change between glaucoma and the control groups in all gazes. The baseline IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and IOP changes according to eye gaze showed a significant negative correlation in all gazes., Conclusions: IOP was significantly elevated in adduction, abduction, and supraduction than in the primary position in both the normal and glaucoma groups. However, there was no significant difference of IOP changes between glaucoma and normal groups., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate risk factors associated with glaucomatous progression in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients., Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational study with a total of 48 PXG patients and age, sex, and visual field (VF) test mean deviation-matched 48 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients recruited from 3 university-based hospitals. Glaucomatous progression was defined by 2 criteria, either optic disc/retinal nerve fiber layer photographic assessment or serial VF data. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to detect associations between risk factors and progression in each subgroup and shared frailty model were used in total participants., Results: In total participants, PXG diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR), 7.245; P=0.050], a higher baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) (HR, 1.221; P=0.025) and a greater number of glaucoma medications (HR, 3.537; P=0.016) were significant factors for glaucoma progression. In the PXG group, a higher baseline IOP (HR, 1.131; P<0.001), a lower IOP reduction (HR, 0.966; P=0.027), a greater number of glaucoma medications (HR, 2.413; P=0.004), and worse baseline VF mean deviation (HR, 0.875; P=0.004) were significant factors, whereas the number of glaucoma medications (HR, 3.493; P=0.019) and disc hemorrhage (HR, 3.953; P=0.043) showed association in the POAG group., Conclusions: Factors associated with progression differed between PXG and POAG groups. Higher baseline IOP and requirement for a greater number of glaucoma medications were related with PXG progression.

Objective: To characterize the 24-h habitual-position intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns of optic disc phenotypes (ODPs) in untreated normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and the relationships between nocturnal IOP elevation and various clinical factors., Design: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study., Methods: Eighty-two NTG patients with focal ischemic (FI) ODP and 82 age- and disease severity-matched NTG patients with myopic glaucomatous (MG) ODP were recruited prospectively over 3 years. The IOP was recorded 11 times over a 24-hour (h) period by a single ophthalmologist using a hand-held tonometer (TonoPen®XL). A cosinor model was used to describe the 24-h IOP rhythm. Associations between nocturnal IOP elevation and both ocular and demographic variables were evaluated using the generalized estimating equation (GEE)., Results: Mean habitual-position IOP was significantly higher during nighttime than daytime in the FI group (16.44 vs. 14.23 mmHg, P < 0.001), but not in the MG group (15.91 vs. 15.70 mmHg, P = 0.82). The FI group also exhibited a significantly higher peak IOP during sleeping hours (P = 0.01) and lower trough IOP during the 24-h period than the MG group (P < 0.01). The MG group showed a significantly higher peak IOP during waking hours than the FI group (P < 0.01). Therefore, 24-h IOP fluctuation range was significantly higher in the FI group than the MG group (P = 0.013). In the FI group, peak habitual-position IOP and the highest frequency of IOP peaks occurred during sleeping hours (12 AM-6 AM). By contrast, IOP peaks in the MG group occurred during morning hours (8 AM-12 PM). The FI group showed an overall nocturnal acrophase in habitual-position IOP, with 45 patients (54.9%) having a nocturnal acrophase; 10 (12.2%), a diurnal acrophase; and 27 (32.9%), no evident acrophase. By contrast, the MG group showed no evident peak in habitual-position IOP, with 9 patients (10.9%) having a nocturnal acrophase; 43 (52.4%), a diurnal acrophase; and 30 (36.6%), no evident acrophase. In multivariate modeling using the GEE, ODP (P < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (SE, P = 0.001) were independently associated with nocturnal IOP elevation., Conclusions: Based on 24-h habitual-position IOP data, FI is associated with significant nocturnal IOP elevation, while no such nocturnal IOP elevation is observed in MG ODP. In untreated NTG, there are also significant differences in the 24-h IOP pattern between FI and MG ODPs., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: We studied the relationship between nocturnal habitual position IOP elevation and diurnal IOP level in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients., Methods: A total of 70 young NTG patients with a low diurnal IOP level (mean diurnal seated IOP < 15.0 mm Hg; low IOP group) and 79 age-, axial length-, and disease severity-matched NTG patients with a high diurnal IOP level (mean diurnal seated IOP ≥ 15.0 mm Hg; high IOP group) were recruited prospectively. Intraocular pressure was recorded 11 times over a 24-hour period by a single, well-trained ophthalmology resident using a hand-held tonometer., Results: The mean habitual position IOP during nighttime (14.2 mm Hg) was significantly higher than that of daytime (12.8 mm Hg) in the low IOP group (P < 0.001), whereas no such difference was found in the high IOP group (16.4 vs. 16.3 mm Hg, P = 0.706). The low IOP group showed an overall nocturnal acrophase in habitual-position IOP, with 11 patients (15.7%) having a diurnal, 30 (42.8%) a nocturnal, and 29 (41.4%) no evident acrophase. By contrast, the high IOP group showed no evident peak in habitual-position IOP, with 28 patients (35.4%) having a diurnal, 12 (15.2%) a nocturnal, and 39 (49.4%) no evident acrophase., Conclusions: In NTG eyes with a low diurnal IOP, there are significant IOP increases at nighttime in the habitual position, whereas there is no significant nocturnal IOP elevation in NTG eyes with a high diurnal IOP.