Search

Purpose: Postoperative sore throat (POST) after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is a common and undesirable complication. In this study, we evaluated the combined effects of paracetamol and dexamethasone on the prevention of POST in patients after general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 226 patients scheduled for urologic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the DexaPara group ( n = 113), dexamethasone (10 mg) and paracetamol (1000 mg) was infused. In the Dexa group ( n = 113), dexamethasone (10 mg) alone was given. POST, hoarseness, and dysphagia were monitored. The postoperative wound pain score and perioperative opioid requirements were compared. In addition, complications related to opioids were compared between the groups. Results: The overall incidence of POST was lower in the DexaPara group than in the Dexa group [42 (37%) vs. 72 (64%), p < 0.001]. The incidence of POST while resting at postoperative 1 and 6 h was lower in the DexaPara group than in the Dexa group ( p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively). The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, shivering, and headache was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Paracetamol and dexamethasone infusion reduced the incidence of POST without serious complications in patients for urologic surgery under general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Maintaining cervical immobilization is essential during tracheal intubation in patients with unstable cervical spines. When using the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in patients with cervical immobilization, substantial neck extension is required for visualization of the glottis. However, the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope may require less neck extension due to its acute angulation. We hypothesized that C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscopic intubation would result in less cervical spine movement than Macintosh laryngoscopic intubation. We compared the effects of C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscopic intubation and Macintosh laryngoscopic intubation in terms of cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured at the occiput–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments before and during tracheal intubation with either a C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope in 20 patients, with application of a neck collar for simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle measured before and during tracheal intubation. Results: The cervical spine motion at the occiput–C1 segment was measured at 12.1 ± 4.2° and 6.8 ± 5.0° during Macintosh laryngoscopic and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopic intubation, respectively, corresponding to a 44% reduction in cervical spine motion when using the latter device (mean difference, − 5.3; 98.33% CI: − 8.8 to − 1.8; p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two intubation devices at the C1–C2 segment (− 0.6; 98.33% CI: − 3.4 to 2.2; p = 0.639) or C2–C5 segment (0.2; 98.33% CI: − 6.0 to 6.4; p = 0.929). Conclusions: The C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope causes less upper cervical spine motion than the Macintosh laryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on June 26, 2018 (NCT03567902). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Minimizing hemodynamic changes during the peri-intubation period is a concern for anesthesiologists. We investigated the effect of lidocaine sprayed on the laryngoscope blade and trachea on hemodynamics during direct laryngoscopic intubation. Methods: Seventy-two patients were randomly allocated to one of four groups: 10 % lidocaine was sprayed either on the laryngoscope blade (group L), on the trachea (group V), or on the laryngoscope blade and the trachea (group LV). No lidocaine was used in group C. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with remifentanil (effect site concentration: 4.0 ng/ml) and propofol (effect site concentration 4.0 μg/ml) continuous infusion using a target control infusion (TCI) device. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded during the peri-intubation period. Results: Changes in MAP and HR over time were markedly different among the four groups ( P < 0.05). MAP at 1 min post-intubation was significantly lower in groups L, V, and LV than in group C (86.1 ± 12.7, 85.3 ± 12.6, and 83.7 ± 13.1 vs 106.3 ± 22.9 mmHg, P < 0.01). Maximum MAP values were lower in groups L and LV than in group C ( P < 0.05). HRs at 1, 2, and 3 min post-intubation were lower in group LV than in group C (70.4 ± 9.0 vs 84.2 ± 15.3; 64.0 ± 8.1 vs 79.2 ± 15.4; 61.6 ± 8.3 vs 77.2 ± 14.5 beats/min, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Lidocaine sprayed on the laryngoscope blade and/or trachea reduced the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopic intubation during the post-intubation period following anesthetic induction with remifentanil and propofol using a TCI device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]