Search

We develop a theoretical framework for framing and solving probabilistic linear(ized) inverse problems in function spaces. This is built on the statistical theory of Gaussian Processes, and allows results to be obtained independent of any basis, avoiding any difficulties associated with the fidelity of representation that can be achieved. We show that the results of Backus–Gilbert theory can be fully understood within our framework, although there is not an exact equivalence due to fundamental differences of philosophy between the two approaches. Nevertheless, our work can be seen to unify several strands of linear inverse theory, and connects it to a large body of work in machine learning. We illustrate the application of our theory using a simple example, involving determination of Earth's radial density structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most linear inverse problems require regularization to ensure that robust and meaningful solutions can be found. Typically, Tikhonov-style regularization is used, whereby a preference is expressed for models that are somehow 'small' and/or 'smooth'. The strength of such preferences is expressed through one or more damping parameters, which control the character of the solution, and which must be set by the user. However, identifying appropriate values is often regarded as a matter of art, guided by various heuristics. As a result, such choices have often been the source of controversy and concern. By treating these as hyperparameters within a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we are able to obtain solutions that encompass the range of permissible regularization parameters. Furthermore, we show that these solutions are often well-approximated by those obtained via standard analysis using certain regularization choices which are—in a certain sense—optimal. We obtain algorithms for determining these optimal values in various cases of common interest, and show that they generate solutions with a number of attractive properties. A reference implementation of these algorithms, written in Python, accompanies this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Owing to the increasing availability of computational resources, in recent years the probabilistic solution of non-linear, geophysical inverse problems by means of sampling methods has become increasingly feasible. Nevertheless, we still face situations in which a Monte Carlo approach is not practical. This is particularly true in cases where the evaluation of the forward problem is computationally intensive or where inversions have to be carried out repeatedly or in a timely manner, as in natural hazards monitoring tasks such as earthquake early warning. Here, we present an alternative to Monte Carlo sampling, in which inferences are entirely based on a set of prior samples--that is, samples that have been obtained independent of a particular observed datum. This has the advantage that the computationally expensive sampling stage becomes separated from the inversion stage, and the set of prior samples--once obtained--can be reused for repeated evaluations of the inverse mapping without additional computational effort. This property is useful if the problem is such that repeated inversions of independent data have to be carried out. We formulate the inverse problem in a Bayesian framework and present a practical way to make posterior inferences based on a set of prior samples. We compare the prior sampling based approach to a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach that samples from the posterior probability distribution. We show results for both a toy example, and a realistic seismological source parameter estimation problem. We find that the posterior uncertainty estimates obtained based on prior sampling can be considered conservative estimates of the uncertainties obtained by directly sampling from the posterior distribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a new approach to measuring the agreement between two oscillatory time-series, such as seismic waveforms, and demonstrate that it can be used effectively in inverse problems. Our approach is based on Optimal Transport theory and the Wasserstein distance, with a novel transformation of the time-series to ensure that necessary normalization and positivity conditions are met. Our measure is differentiable, and can readily be used within an optimization framework. We demonstrate performance with a variety of synthetic examples, including seismic source inversion, and observe substantially better convergence properties than achieved with conventional L 2 misfits. We also briefly discuss the relationship between Optimal Transport and Bayesian inference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]