Search

We develop a theoretical framework for framing and solving probabilistic linear(ized) inverse problems in function spaces. This is built on the statistical theory of Gaussian Processes, and allows results to be obtained independent of any basis, avoiding any difficulties associated with the fidelity of representation that can be achieved. We show that the results of Backus–Gilbert theory can be fully understood within our framework, although there is not an exact equivalence due to fundamental differences of philosophy between the two approaches. Nevertheless, our work can be seen to unify several strands of linear inverse theory, and connects it to a large body of work in machine learning. We illustrate the application of our theory using a simple example, involving determination of Earth's radial density structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

By starting from a general framework for probabilistic continuous inversion (developed in Part I) and introducing discrete basis functions, we obtain the well-known algorithms for probabilistic least-squares inversion set out by Tarantola & Valette. In doing so, we establish a direct equivalence between the spatial covariance function that must be specified in continuous inversion, and the combination of basis functions and prior covariance matrix that must be chosen for discretized inversion. We show that the common choice of Tikhonov regularization (⁠|$\mathbf {C_m^{-1}} = \sigma ^2\mathbf {I}$|⁠) arises from a delta-function spatial covariance, and that this lies behind many of the artefacts commonly associated with discretized inversion. We show that other choices of spatial covariance function can be used to generate regularization matrices yielding substantially better results, and permitting localization of features even if global basis functions are used. We are also able to offer a straightforward explanation for the spectral leakage problem identified by Trampert & Snieder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most linear inverse problems require regularization to ensure that robust and meaningful solutions can be found. Typically, Tikhonov-style regularization is used, whereby a preference is expressed for models that are somehow 'small' and/or 'smooth'. The strength of such preferences is expressed through one or more damping parameters, which control the character of the solution, and which must be set by the user. However, identifying appropriate values is often regarded as a matter of art, guided by various heuristics. As a result, such choices have often been the source of controversy and concern. By treating these as hyperparameters within a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we are able to obtain solutions that encompass the range of permissible regularization parameters. Furthermore, we show that these solutions are often well-approximated by those obtained via standard analysis using certain regularization choices which are—in a certain sense—optimal. We obtain algorithms for determining these optimal values in various cases of common interest, and show that they generate solutions with a number of attractive properties. A reference implementation of these algorithms, written in Python, accompanies this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Owing to the increasing availability of computational resources, in recent years the probabilistic solution of non-linear, geophysical inverse problems by means of sampling methods has become increasingly feasible. Nevertheless, we still face situations in which a Monte Carlo approach is not practical. This is particularly true in cases where the evaluation of the forward problem is computationally intensive or where inversions have to be carried out repeatedly or in a timely manner, as in natural hazards monitoring tasks such as earthquake early warning. Here, we present an alternative to Monte Carlo sampling, in which inferences are entirely based on a set of prior samples--that is, samples that have been obtained independent of a particular observed datum. This has the advantage that the computationally expensive sampling stage becomes separated from the inversion stage, and the set of prior samples--once obtained--can be reused for repeated evaluations of the inverse mapping without additional computational effort. This property is useful if the problem is such that repeated inversions of independent data have to be carried out. We formulate the inverse problem in a Bayesian framework and present a practical way to make posterior inferences based on a set of prior samples. We compare the prior sampling based approach to a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach that samples from the posterior probability distribution. We show results for both a toy example, and a realistic seismological source parameter estimation problem. We find that the posterior uncertainty estimates obtained based on prior sampling can be considered conservative estimates of the uncertainties obtained by directly sampling from the posterior distribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whenever a geophysical image is to be constructed, a variety of choices must be made. Some, such as those governing data selection and processing, or model parametrization, are somewhat arbitrary: there may be little reason to prefer one choice over another. Others, such as defining the theoretical framework within which the data are to be explained, may be more straightforward: typically, an 'exact' theory exists, but various approximations may need to be adopted in order to make the imaging problem computationally tractable. Differences between any two images of the same system can be explained in terms of differences between these choices. Understanding the impact of each particular decision is essential if images are to be interpreted properly—but little progress has been made towards a quantitative treatment of this effect. In this paper, we consider a general linearized inverse problem, applicable to a wide range of imaging situations. We write down an expression for the difference between two images produced using similar inversion strategies, but where different choices have been made. This provides a framework within which inversion algorithms may be analysed, and allows us to consider how image effects may arise. In this paper, we take a general view, and do not specialize our discussion to any specific imaging problem or setup (beyond the restrictions implied by the use of linearized inversion techniques). In particular, we look at the concept of 'hybrid inversion', in which highly accurate synthetic data (typically the result of an expensive numerical simulation) is combined with an inverse operator constructed based on theoretical approximations. It is generally supposed that this offers the benefits of using the more complete theory, without the full computational costs.We argue that the inverse operator is as important as the forward calculation in determining the accuracy of results. We illustrate this using a simple example, based on imaging the density structure of a vibrating string. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The determination of earthquake source parameters is an important task in seismology. For many applications, it is also valuable to understand the uncertainties associated with these determinations, and this is particularly true in the context of earthquake early warning (EEW) and hazard mitigation. In this paper, we develop a framework for probabilistic moment tensor point source inversions in near real time. Our methodology allows us to find an approximation to p(m|d), the conditional probability of source models (m) given observations (d). This is obtained by smoothly interpolating a set of random prior samples, using Mixture Density Networks (MDNs)—a class of neural networks which output the parameters of a Gaussian mixture model. By combining multiple networks as ‘committees’, we are able to obtain a significant improvement in performance over that of a single MDN. Once a committee has been constructed, new observations can be inverted within milliseconds on a standard desktop computer. The method is therefore well suited for use in situations such as EEW, where inversions must be performed routinely and rapidly for a fixed station geometry. To demonstrate the method, we invert regional static GPS displacement data for the 2010 MW 7.2 El Mayor Cucapah earthquake in Baja California to obtain estimates of magnitude, centroid location and depth and focal mechanism. We investigate the extent to which we can constrain moment tensor point sources with static displacement observations under realistic conditions. Our inversion results agree well with published point source solutions for this event, once the uncertainty bounds of each are taken into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How do body-wave traveltimes constrain the Earth's radial (1-D) seismic structure? Existing 1-D seismological models underpin 3-D seismic tomography and earthquake location algorithms. It is therefore crucial to assess the quality of such 1-D models, yet quantifying uncertainties in seismological models is challenging and thus often ignored. Ideally, quality assessment should be an integral part of the inverse method. Our aim in this study is twofold: (i) we show how to solve a general Bayesian non-linear inverse problem and quantify model uncertainties, and (ii) we investigate the constraint on spherically symmetric P-wave velocity (VP) structure provided by body-wave traveltimes from the EHB bulletin (phases Pn, P, PP and PKP). Our approach is based on artificial neural networks, which are very common in pattern recognition problems and can be used to approximate an arbitrary function. We use a Mixture Density Network to obtain 1-D marginal posterior probability density functions (pdfs), which provide a quantitative description of our knowledge on the individual Earth parameters. No linearization or model damping is required, which allows us to infer a model which is constrained purely by the data.We present 1-D marginal posterior pdfs for the 22 VP parameters and seven discontinuity depths in our model. P-wave velocities in the inner core, outer core and lower mantle are resolved well, with standard deviations of ∼0.2 to 1 per cent with respect to the mean of the posterior pdfs. The maximum likelihoods of VP are in general similar to the corresponding ak135 values, which lie within one or two standard deviations from the posterior means, thus providing an independent validation of ak135 in this part of the radial model. Conversely, the data contain little or no information on P-wave velocity in the D′′ layer, the upper mantle and the homogeneous crustal layers. Further, the data do not constrain the depth of the discontinuities in our model. Using additional phases available in the ISC bulletin, such as PcP, PKKP and the converted phases SP and ScP, may enhance the resolvability of these parameters. Finally, we show how the method can be extended to obtain a posterior pdf for a multidimensional model space. This enables us to investigate correlations between model parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To perform seismic tomography, accurate determinations of event locations and focal mechanisms are required. These are usually obtained prior to tomographic inversion; often, little attention is paid to the earth model used for their determination. We show that an imprint of this model is found in the model recovered after tomographic inversion. To reduce this problem, it is important to recalculate earthquake source parameters as the inversion proceeds; synthetic tests suggest that this yields a better correspondence between recovered and true models. However, alternate source and structure inversions lead to a slow rate of convergence, and significant errors remain. We therefore propose combining source and structure inversion into a single inverse problem, and present an efficient algorithm to do this. We demonstrate that this reduces the number of iterations required to achieve a given accuracy; in our experiments, we observe a fourfold improvement on alternate inversions. We focus on full-waveform inversions for both source and structure, although the methods presented are general and should be applicable to other techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]