Search

Background: Before the development of antithyroid drugs in the 1940s, treatment of Graves' hyperthyroidism was primarily surgical. Surgical mortality was quite variable, but a significant minority of patients died during or after surgery. Summary: In 1936, Karl Compton, President of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in a lecture attended by Massachusetts General Hospital physicians, suggested that artificially radioactive isotopes might be useful for studying metabolism. By 1942, Hertz and Roberts reported on the successful use of radioactive iodine (RAI) to treat Graves' hyperthyroidism. RAI uptake was subsequently demonstrated in well-differentiated thyroid cancer metastases. In 1948, Seidlin demonstrated stimulation of uptake in thyroid cancer metastases by thyrotropin (TSH). By 1990, 69% of endocrinologists in North America recommended RAI for Graves' hyperthyroidism. Currently RAI is less frequently used for Graves' hyperthyroidism, related to concerns about exacerbation of thyroid eye disease, about radiation exposure, and about potential adverse consequences of permanent hypothyroidism. Similarly, RAI was administered to the majority of patients with thyroid cancer for decades, but its use is now more selective. Conclusions: RAI is a remarkable example of interinstitutional cooperation between physicians and scientists to transition from bench to bedside in only three years. It is the model for a theranostic approach to disease (the simultaneous use of a radioactive drug for diagnosis and therapy). The future of RAI is less certain; inhibition of TSH receptor stimulating antibodies in Graves' disease and more precise targeting of genes that drive thyroid oncogenesis may diminish the use of RAI. Alternatively, redifferentiation techniques may improve the efficacy of RAI in RAI-refractory thyroid cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The letter responds to a suggestion that radioactive iodine (RAI) should be the preferred therapy for Graves' hyperthyroidism with large goiters. The author clarifies that the 2016 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines do not categorize large goiters specifically, but surgery is favored for goiters ≥80 g. The guidelines also indicate that RAI is not the first-line treatment for large thyroid nodules. The author acknowledges that large goiters are often undertreated with RAI, but there are concerns about radiation-related complications and patient acceptance of RAI as a treatment modality has decreased. The ATA guidelines do not exclude the use of RAI for patients with Graves' disease and large goiters, but surgery is favored. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The noninvasive subtype of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (eFVPTC) has been reclassified as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in 2016 to reflect the indolent behavior and favorable prognosis of this type of tumor. This terminology change has also de-escalated its management approach from cancer treatment to a more conservative treatment strategy befitting a benign thyroid neoplasm. Objective: To characterize the reduced health care costs and improved quality of life (QOL) from management of NIFTP as a nonmalignant tumor compared with the previous management as eFVPTC. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by creating Markov models to simulate two management strategies for NIFTP: (i) de-escalated management of the tumor as NIFTP involving lobectomy with reduced follow-up, (ii) management of the tumor as eFVPTC involving completion thyroidectomy/radioactive iodine ablation for some patients, and follow-up recommended for carcinoma. The model was simulated for 5 and 20 years following diagnosis of NIFTP. Aggregate costs and quality-life years were measured. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed for all variables. Results: Over a five-year simulation period, de-escalated management of NIFTP had a total cost of $12,380.99 per patient while the more aggressive management of the tumor as eFVPTC had a total cost of $16,264.03 per patient (saving $3883.05 over five years). Management of NIFTP provided 5.00 quality-adjusted life years, whereas management as eFVPTC provided 4.97 quality-adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses showed that management of NIFTP always resulted in lower costs and greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over the sensitivity ranges for individual variables. De-escalated management for NIFTP is expected to produce ∼$6–42 million in cost savings over a five-year period for these patients, and incremental 54–370 QALYs of increased utility in the United States. Conclusion: The degree of cost savings and improved patient utility of de-escalated NIFTP management compared with traditional management was estimated to be $3883.05 and 0.03 QALYs per patient. We demonstrate that these findings persisted in sensitivity analysis to account for variability in recurrence rate, surveillance approaches, and other model inputs. These findings allow for greater understanding of the economic and QOL impact of the NIFTP reclassification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of Graves' disease (GD) in the US is shifting towards increased use of anti‐thyroid drugs (ATD). If patients fail to achieve remission after a standard course of therapy of 12–18 months, long‐term treatment with ATD (≥24 months) may be chosen over definitive therapy with radioiodine (RAI) or surgery. Clinicians will need to contrast this strategy to ablative therapies as they help patients in decision making. Summary: Review of the literature illustrates that long‐term ATD delivers euthyroidism with minimal complications, low financial cost and with an advantageous profile regarding quality of life (QoL) and other biological outcomes. Conclusions: Long‐term ATD is a viable alternative to ablative therapies in the management of GD offering advantages across multiple patient centred outcomes. Decision making must factor differences in this approach compared to ablative therapies and ultimately be tailored to individualized patient situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thyrotoxicosis has multiple etiologies, manifestations, and potential therapies. Appropriate treatment requires an accurate diagnosis and is influenced by coexisting medical conditions and patient preference. This document describes evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of thyrotoxicosis that would be useful to generalist and subspecialty physicians and others providing care for patients with this condition. Methods: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) previously cosponsored guidelines for the management of thyrotoxicosis that were published in 2011. Considerable new literature has been published since then, and the ATA felt updated evidence-based guidelines were needed. The association assembled a task force of expert clinicians who authored this report. They examined relevant literature using a systematic PubMed search supplemented with additional published materials. An evidence-based medicine approach that incorporated the knowledge and experience of the panel was used to update the 2011 text and recommendations. The strength of the recommendations and the quality of evidence supporting them were rated according to the approach recommended by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Group. Results: Clinical topics addressed include the initial evaluation and management of thyrotoxicosis; management of Graves' hyperthyroidism using radioactive iodine, antithyroid drugs, or surgery; management of toxic multinodular goiter or toxic adenoma using radioactive iodine or surgery; Graves' disease in children, adolescents, or pregnant patients; subclinical hyperthyroidism; hyperthyroidism in patients with Graves' orbitopathy; and management of other miscellaneous causes of thyrotoxicosis. New paradigms since publication of the 2011 guidelines are presented for the evaluation of the etiology of thyrotoxicosis, the management of Graves' hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs, the management of pregnant hyperthyroid patients, and the preparation of patients for thyroid surgery. The sections on less common causes of thyrotoxicosis have been expanded. Conclusions: One hundred twenty-four evidence-based recommendations were developed to aid in the care of patients with thyrotoxicosis and to share what the task force believes is current, rational, and optimal medical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]