Search

A total of 1200 patients had undergone I-125 prostate brachytherapy (BXT) in our centre. We present prospective outcome data for the first 400 treated patients. Data were analysed from a prospective database of 400 consecutive patients treated with permanent prostate BXT between March 1999 and December 2003. Patients were stratified into low (49%), intermediate (36%) and high (15%) risk as defined by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Prognostic Index. Patients received 145 Gy BXT alone (41%), BXT with 3 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) (39%), 45 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 110 Gy BXT (3%) or a combination of NAAD, 45 Gy EBRT and 110 Gy BXT (17%). Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadirs were analysed for treatment received in each risk group. Median follow-up was 54 months (range, 38-96 months) with a mean patient age of 63 years. Prostate cancer-specific survival was 99.5%. Twenty-eight patients (7%) experienced biochemical failure according to the 2006 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (RTOG-ASTRO) Phoenix Consensus definition (PSA nadir plus >or=2 ng ml(-1)): nine low-, fourteen intermediate- and five high-risk patients. When stratified by treatment group for low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, the 5-year actuarial bRFS was 98, 89 and 100% for BXT; 91, 87 and 88% for NAAD and BXT; 100, 80 and 100% for EBRT and BXT; and 100, 92 and 88% for NAAD, EBRT and BXT, respectively. Overall 4- and 5-year PSA

Purpose: Erectile dysfunction following prostate brachytherapy is reported to be related to dose received by the penile bulb. To minimise this, whilst preserving prostate dosimetry, we have developed a technique for I-125 seed brachytherapy using both stranded seeds and loose seeds delivered with a Mick applicator, and implanted via the sagittal plane on trans-rectal ultrasound., Materials and Methods: Post-implant dosimetry and potency rates were compared in 120 potent patients. In Group 1, 60 patients were treated using a conventional technique of seeds implanted in a modified-uniform distribution. From January 2005, a novel technique was developed using stranded seeds peripherally and centrally distributed loose seeds implanted via a Mick applicator (Group 2). The latter technique allows greater flexibility when implanting the seeds at the apex. Each patient was prescribed a minimum peripheral dose of 145 Gy. No patients received external beam radiotherapy or hormone treatment. There was no significant difference in age or pre-implant potency score (mean IIEF-5 score 22.4 vs. 22.6, p=0.074) between the two groups., Results: The new technique delivers lower penile bulb doses (D(25) as %mPD - Group 1: 61.2+/-35.7, Group 2: 29.7+/-16.0, p<0.0001; D(50) as %mPD - Group 1: 45.8+/-26.9, Group 2: 21.4+/-11.7, p<0.0001) whilst improving prostate dosimetry (D(90) - Group 1: 147 Gy+/-21.1, Group 2: 155 Gy+/-16.7, p=0.03). At 2 years, the potency rate was also improved: Group 1: 61.7%; Group 2: 83.3% (p=0.008)., Conclusions: In this study, the novel brachytherapy technique using both peripheral stranded seeds and central loose seeds delivered via a Mick applicator results in a lower penile bulb dose whilst improving prostate dosimetry, and may achieve higher potency rates.

This article on permanent iodine-125 seed prostate brachytherapy reviews the techniques, results, and patient selection issues for early prostate cancer. The long-term 10 y results of brachytherapy from Seattle, and their reproducibility in other centres both in the USA and UK are reported. The use of hormone therapy in brachytherapy and the value of combining external beam radiotherapy with a brachytherapy implant are discussed. Reviewed comparative data show the similarity of biochemical survival in patients treated with brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy. The role of brachytherapy as a first-line treatment option for patients with prostate cancer is demonstrated.

Objective: To report the results from the first 100 consecutive patients treated with 125I transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy between March 1999 and June 2001, and to determine if the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume or urodynamic variables correlate with acute morbidity., Patients and Methods: Patients were assessed prospectively by uroflowmetry, the IPSS, a physical examination and transrectal ultrasonography. Of the 100 patients, 57 had a full urodynamic assessment, 61 presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), 25 were screen-detected and 14 presented with other problems. The IPSS was recorded at 1, 6 and 12 weeks, and then at 3-monthly intervals after treatment; significant events, e.g. acute urinary retention (AUR) and rectal symptoms, were recorded prospectively; the mean follow-up was 16 months., Results: No patients were incontinent after treatment. There was a temporary deterioration in IPSS in 89% of patients. Peak symptoms occurred at 6 weeks and a statistically significant deterioration in IPSS persisted until 9 months, but continued to improve throughout the follow-up. AUR affected seven patients, with a further 20 using clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) for symptoms. In most patients the symptoms resolved spontaneously to the levels before treatment, with only two patients requiring surgery for bladder outlet obstruction. The IPSS before treatment did not predict urodynamic obstruction. Urodynamically unobstructed patients did not require catheterization. By 2 years after implantation the mean IPSS was better than before treatment. Five patients had mild, transient proctitis., Conclusion: Selecting patients with a low prostate volume and IPSS is likely to optimize the outcome of brachytherapy. Urodynamic studies may be helpful in predicting the risk of AUR and symptoms requiring CISC. Despite many patients presenting with LUTS, acute morbidity was no worse than that reported in large American series of predominantly screening-detected cancers. Prostate brachytherapy is well tolerated and may be safely delivered to patients with prostate cancer in the UK.

We report a case of a patient who at the age of 32 developed a squamous carcinoma arising in the thorax. At 7 years of age he had received aggressive treatment with 131I for a thyroid carcinoma with multiple pulmonary metastases. Radiation induced malignancy, in sites such as the bone marrow or bladder, after 131I therapy is recognized; however, tumours arising in the thorax after such treatment have not been described.