Search

The influence of the spin state of the metal centre in spin crossover compounds on the aromaticity of the ligands has been investigated for iron(II)tris-bipyridine (Fe(bpy)32+), and Fe(II)(formazanate)2 (as a truncated model and the full phenyl substituted compound). It was found that the aromaticity of the bipyridine ligands is unaffected by changing the spin state of the central iron atom, but that of the formazanate ligands is reduced upon transition to the high-spin state. This change in aromaticity is rationalized using the symmetry selection rules for aromaticity in terms of virtual excitations from occupied to empty orbitals. A further consequence of this loss in aromaticity is a shift to higher energy in the ring vibrations of the formazanate compounds that can be observed in either its IR or Raman spectrum; this prediction has been confirmed here. This change in aromaticity as a consequence of change in spin state can be regarded as an indication for non-innocent ligands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One route to address climate change is converting carbon dioxide to synthetic carbon‐neutral fuels. Whereas carbon dioxide to CO conversion has precedent in homo‐ and heterogeneous catalysis, deoxygenative coupling of CO to products with C−C bonds—as in liquid fuels—remains challenging. Here, we report coupling of two CO molecules by a diiron complex. Reduction of Fe2(CO)2L (2), where L2− is a bis(β‐diketiminate) cyclophane, gives [K(THF)5][Fe2(CO)2L] (3), which undergoes silylation to Fe2(CO)(COSiMe3)L (4). Subsequent C‐OSiMe3 bond cleavage and C=C bond formation occurs upon reduction of 4, yielding Fe2(μ‐CCO)L. CO derived ligands in this series mediate weak exchange interactions with the ketenylidene affording the smallest J value, with changes to local metal ion spin states and coupling schemes (ferro‐ vs. antiferromagnetism) based on DFT calculations, Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopy. Finally, reaction of 5 with KEt3BH or methanol releases the C2O2− ligand with retention of the diiron core [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Complexation of Fe[ClO4]2·6H2O by 1 equiv. 2,6-bis((4S)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)pyridine ((S)-L1Ph) and 2,6-bis((4R)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)pyridine ((R)-L2Ph) cleanly affords [Fe((S)-L1Ph)((R)-L2Ph)][ClO4]2; [Fe((R)-L1iPr)((S)-L2iPr)][ClO4]2 (L1iPr = 2,6-bis(4-isopropyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)pyridine; L2iPr = 2,6-bis(4-isopropyl-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)pyridine) was prepared by a similar route. The compounds exhibit thermal spin-crossover in solution, at temperatures midway between the corresponding [Fe((R)-L1R)((S)-L1R)][ClO4]2 and [Fe((R)-L2R)((S)-L2R)][ClO4]2 (R = Ph or iPr) species. The spin states of [Fe(LR)(bimpy)][ClO4]2 and [Fe(LR)(bpp)][ClO4]2 (LR = L1R or L2R; bimpy = 2,6-bis(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine; bpp = 2,6-di(pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine) are also reported, with most examples exhibiting gradual spin-crossover in solution and the solid state. Although some products undergo partial ligand exchange in solution by 1H NMR, their solution T½ values appear unaffected by this and correlate well with their spin state energies from gas phase DFT calculations. The high-spin state of [Fe(L2R)(bpp)]2+ is more stabilised than expected, compared to the other [Fe(LR)L]2+ complexes studied (L = bimpy, bpp or terpy). That is explained by an interplay between the relative σ-basicities and π-acidities of the two ligands in each molecule. The steric influence of their phenyl or isopropyl 'R' substituents stabilises the heteroleptic complexes by up to 5 kcal mol−1, compared to analogues lacking these groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fine-tuning of intermolecular or intramolecular non-covalent interactions (NCIs) and thus the precise synthesis of metal complexes in which the spin states can be controlled by NCIs remains challenging, even though several such complexes have been intensively studied. In this regard, we present mononuclear cobalt(II) and iron(II) complexes with "click"-derived tripodal ligands that contain fluorinated benzyl substituents in the secondary coordination sphere. The complexes were co-crystallized with different solvent molecules to decipher the effect of the crystallized solvents on NCIs, and on the spin state of the metal ion. Additionally, the fluorine-specific interactions in the secondary coordination sphere were examined. We present a first structure-property correlation between the nature of interaction of the (per)fluorinated aromatic substituents on the ligand periphery, and the spin state of the metal complexes. In particular, the TF5TA containing ligand show interesting stacking motifs depending on the used solvent, and these interactions have an influence on the spin state of the cobalt(II) complexes. Furthermore, the iron(II) complex thereof, Fe(TF5TA)2(BF4)2·2EtOH displays spin crossover (SCO). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The title compound, [Fe(C3H7NO)6][Cd2Cl7], crystallizes in the trigonal space group R3̅ and is assembled from discrete [Fe(DMF)6] 3+ cations (DMF = N,Ndimethylformamide) and [Cd2Cl7] 3- anions. In the cation, the iron(III) atom, located on a special position of 3̅ site symmetry, is coordinated by six oxygen atoms from DMF ligands with all Fe—O distances being equal [2.0072 (16) A˚ ]. A slight distortion of the octahedral environment of the metal comes from the cis O—Fe—O angles deviating from the ideal value of 90 [86.85 (7) and 93.16 (7)] whilst all the trans angles are strictly 180. The central Cl atom of the [Cd2Cl7] 3- anion is also located on a special position of 3̅ site symmetry and bridges two corner sharing, tetrahedrally coordinated CdII atoms. The two Cd atoms and the central Cl atom are colinear. The two sets of terminal chloride ligands on either side of the dumbbell-like anion are rotated relative to each other by 30. In the crystal, the cations and anions, stacked one above the other along the c-axis direction, are held in place principally by electrostatic interactions. There are also C—H...Cl and C—H...O interactions, but these are rather weak. Of the six crystal structures reported to date for ionic salts of [Fe(DMF)6] n+ cations (n = 2, 3), five contain FeII ions. The title compound is the second example of a stable compound containing the [Fe(DMF)6] 3+ cation. The existence of both [Fe(DMF)6] 2+ and [Fe(DMF)6] 3+ cations shows that the DMF ligand coordination sphere can accommodate changes in the charge and spin states of the metal centre. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To study the effect of the chelate ring size on the magnetic properties of thioether‐based iron(II) metal complexes, two ligands have been envisaged, synthesised and characterised. The two ligands correspond to the bidentate benzylpicolylthioether (PySBn) and tetradentate 2,3‐bis(((2‐pyridylmethyl)thio)methyl)quinoxaline (QuinoxS). Five iron(II) complexes have been synthesised, containing either two bidentate ligands or one tetradentate ligand, and two N‐bond NCE co‐ligands (E=S, Se or BH3): trans‐[FeII(PySBn)2(NCE)2] (1 a–b) and cis‐[FeII(QuinoxS)(NCE)2] (2 a–c), a for E=S, b for E=Se and c for E=BH3. The iron(II) complexes have been characterised by standard techniques, X‐ray crystallography (except for complex 1 a) and VT‐magnetic measurements in the solid state. X‐ray crystallography showed that all the complexes are isolated in the high spin (HS) state, based on the relatively long Fe−L bond lengths, Fe−N>2.0 Å and Fe−S≈2.5–2.6 Å. VT‐magnetic measurements demonstrated that complexes 1 a and 2 a‐c are stabilised in the HS‐state, showing orbital contribution to g and zero field splitting. However, complexes 1 b shows a relatively abrupt, hysteretic, and incomplete at the low‐end spin conversion, with T1/2↓=92, T1/2↑=98 K and ΔT1/2=6 K at 5 K min−1, moreover, the hysteresis loop is scan rate dependent increasing up to 11 K at 10 K min−1. An analysis of structural and electronic parameters has been performed to rationalise the differing magnetic properties of the metal complexes, such as metallacycle size, bond lengths and angles, and cis‐ vs. trans‐coordination mode. A comparison with the literature‐reported spin crossover iron(II) complexes in N4S2 coordination sphere containing NCE co‐ligands has been conducted as well, finding that, as previously reported, the Fe−N−C(E) bond angle is diagnostic for determining the spin lability of the metal complexes, and in addition we have found that the N−C(E) bond length is too useful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is promising and challenging to manipulate the electronic structures and functions of materials utilizing both metal‐to‐metal charge transfer (MMCT) and spin‐crossover (SCO) to tune the valence and spin states of metal ions. Herein, a metallocyanate building block is used to link with a FeII‐triazole moiety and generates a mixed‐valence complex {[(Tp4‐Me)FeIII(CN)3]9[FeII4(trz‐ph)6]}⋅[Ph3PMe]2⋅[(Tp4‐Me)FeIII(CN)3] (1; trz‐ph=4‐phenyl‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole). Moreover, MMCT occurs between FeIII and one of the FeII sites after heat treatment, resulting in the generation of a new phase, {[(Tp4‐Me)FeII(CN)3][(Tp4‐Me)FeIII(CN)3]8 [FeIIIFeII3(trz‐ph)6]}⋅ [Ph3PMe]2⋅[(Tp4‐Me)FeIII(CN)3] (1 a). Structural and magnetic studies reveal that MMCT can tune the two‐step SCO behavior of 1 into one‐step SCO behavior of 1 a. Our work demonstrates that the integration of MMCT and SCO can provide a new alternative for manipulating functional spin‐transition materials with accessible multi‐electronic states. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correction for 'Heteroleptic iron(II) complexes of chiral 2,6-bis(oxazolin-2-yl)-pyridine (PyBox) and 2,6-bis(thiazolin-2-yl)pyridine ligands – the interplay of two different ligands on the metal ion spin state' by Namrah Shahid et al., Dalton Trans., 2022, 51, 4262–4274, DOI: 10.1039/d2dt00393g. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]