Search

Methanogens often inhabit sulfidic environments that favor the precipitation of transition metals such as iron (Fe) as metal sulfides, including mackinawite (FeS) and pyrite (FeS 2 ). These metal sulfides have historically been considered biologically unavailable. Nonetheless, methanogens are commonly cultivated with sulfide (HS - ) as a sulfur source, a condition that would be expected to favor metal precipitation and thus limit metal availability. Recent studies have shown that methanogens can access Fe and sulfur (S) from FeS and FeS 2 to sustain growth. As such, medium supplied with FeS 2 should lead to higher availability of transition metals when compared to medium supplied with HS - . Here, we examined how transition metal availability under sulfidic (i.e., cells provided with HS - as sole S source) versus non-sulfidic (cells provided with FeS 2 as sole S source) conditions impact the metalloproteome of Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro. To achieve this, we employed size exclusion chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and shotgun proteomics. Significant changes were observed in the composition and abundance of iron, cobalt, nickel, zinc, and molybdenum proteins. Among the differences were alterations in the stoichiometry and abundance of multisubunit protein complexes involved in methanogenesis and electron transport chains. Our data suggest that M. barkeri utilizes the minimal iron-sulfur cluster complex and canonical cysteine biosynthesis proteins when grown on FeS 2 but uses the canonical Suf pathway in conjunction with the tRNA-Sep cysteine pathway for iron-sulfur cluster and cysteine biosynthesis under sulfidic growth conditions.IMPORTANCEProteins that catalyze biochemical reactions often require transition metals that can have a high affinity for sulfur, another required element for life. Thus, the availability of metals and sulfur are intertwined and can have large impacts on an organismismal biochemistry. Methanogens often occupy anoxic, sulfide-rich (euxinic) environments that favor the precipitation of transition metals as metal sulfides, thereby creating presumed metal limitation. Recently, several methanogens have been shown to acquire iron and sulfur from pyrite, an abundant iron-sulfide mineral that was traditionally considered to be unavailable to biology. The work presented here provides new insights into the distribution of metalloproteins, and metal uptake of Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro grown under euxinic or pyritic growth conditions. Thorough characterizations of this methanogen under different metal and sulfur conditions increase our understanding of the influence of metal availability on methanogens, and presumably other anaerobes, that inhabit euxinic environments., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nickel (Ni) is a key component of the active site metallocofactors of numerous enzymes required for methanogenesis, including [NiFe]-hydrogenase, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, and methyl CoM reductase, leading to a high demand for Ni among methanogens. However, methanogens often inhabit euxinic environments that favor the sequestration of nickel as metal-sulfide minerals, such as nickelian pyrite [(Ni,Fe)S 2 ], that have low solubilities and that are not considered bioavailable. Recently, however, several different model methanogens ( Methanosarcina barkeri , Methanococcus voltae , Methanococcus maripaludis ) were shown to reductively dissolve pyrite (FeS 2 ) and to utilize dissolution products to meet iron and sulfur biosynthetic demands. Here, using M. barkeri Fusaro, and laboratory-synthesized (Ni,Fe)S 2 that was physically isolated from cells using dialysis membranes, we show that trace nickel (<20 nM) abiotically solubilized from the mineral can support methanogenesis and limited growth, roughly fivefold less than the minimum concentration known to support methanogenesis. Furthermore, when provided direct contact with (Ni,Fe)S 2 , M. barkeri promoted the reductive dissolution of (Ni,Fe)S 2 and assimilated solubilized nickel, iron, and sulfur as its sole source of these elements. Cells that reductively dissolved (Ni,Fe)S 2 bioaccumulated approximately fourfold more nickel than those grown with soluble nickel and sulfide but had similar metabolic coupling efficiencies. While the mechanism for Ni uptake in archaeal methanogens is not known, homologs of the bacterial Nik uptake system were shown to be ubiquitous across methanogen genomes. Collectively, these observations indicate that (Ni,Fe)S 2 is bioavailable in anoxic environments and that methanogens can convert this mineral into nickel-, iron-, and sulfur-containing metalloenzymes to support methanogenesis and growth. IMPORTANCE Nickel is an essential metal, and its availability has changed dramatically over Earth history due to shifts in the predominant type of volcanism in the late Archean that limited its availability and an increase in euxinic conditions in the early Proterozoic that favored its precipitation as nickel sulfide minerals. Observations presented herein indicate that the methanogen, Methanosarcina barkeri , can acquire nickel at low concentration (<20 nM) from soluble and mineral sources. Furthermore, M. barkeri was shown to actively reduce nickelian pyrite; use dissolution products to meet their iron, sulfur, and nickel demands; and bioaccumulate nickel. These data help to explain how M. barkeri (and possibly other methanogens and anaerobes) can acquire nickel in contemporary and past anoxic or euxinic environments., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Pyrite (FeS 2 ) is the most abundant iron sulfide mineral in Earth's crust. Until recently, FeS 2 has been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) at low temperature in the absence of oxygen or oxidative weathering, making these elements unavailable to biology. However, anaerobic methanogens can transfer electrons extracellularly to reduce FeS 2 via direct contact with the mineral. Reduction of FeS 2 occurs through a multistep process that generates aqueous sulfide (HS - ) and FeS 2 -associated pyrrhotite (Fe 1-x S). Subsequent dissolution of Fe 1-x S provides Fe(II) (aq) , but not HS - , that rapidly complexes with HS - (aq) reduction to form soluble iron sulfur clusters [nFeS 2 reduction to form soluble iron sulfur clusters [nFeS (aq) ]. Cells assimilate nFeS (aq) to meet Fe/S nutritional demands by mobilizing and hyperaccumulating Fe and S from FeS 2 . As such, reductive dissolution of FeS 2 by methanogens has important implications for element cycling in anoxic habitats, both today and in the geologic past., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests No interests are declared., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Methanogens have a high demand for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S); however, little is known of how they acquire, deploy, and store these elements and how this, in turn, affects their physiology. Methanogens were recently shown to reduce pyrite (FeS 2 ), generating aqueous iron sulfide (FeS aq ) clusters that are likely assimilated as a source of Fe and S. Here, we compared the phenotypes of Methanococcus voltae grown with FeS 2 or ferrous iron [Fe(II)] and sulfide (HS - ). FeS 2 -grown cells are 33% smaller yet have 193% more Fe than Fe(II)/HS - -grown cells. Whole-cell electron paramagnetic resonance revealed similar distributions of paramagnetic Fe, although FeS 2 -grown cells showed a broad spectral feature attributed to intracellular thioferrate-like nanoparticles. Differential proteomic analyses showed similar expression of core methanogenesis enzymes, indicating that Fe and S source does not substantively alter the energy metabolism of cells. However, a homolog of the Fe(II) transporter FeoB and its putative transcriptional regulator DtxR were up-expressed in FeS 2 -grown cells, suggesting that cells sense Fe(II) limitation. Two homologs of IssA, a protein putatively involved in coordinating thioferrate nanoparticles, were also up-expressed in FeS 2 -grown cells. We interpret these data to indicate that, in FeS 2 -grown cells, DtxR cannot sense Fe(II) and therefore cannot downregulate FeoB. We suggest this is due to the transport of Fe(II) complexed with sulfide (FeS aq ), leading to excess Fe that is sequestered by IssA as a thioferrate-like species. This model provides a framework for the design of targeted experiments aimed at further characterizing Fe acquisition and homeostasis in M. voltae and other methanogens. IMPORTANCE FeS 2 is the most abundant sulfide mineral in the Earth's crust and is common in environments inhabited by methanogenic archaea. FeS 2 can be reduced by methanogens, yielding aqueous FeS aq clusters that are thought to be a source of Fe and S. Here, we show that growth of Methanococcus voltae on FeS 2 results in smaller cell size and higher Fe content per cell, with Fe likely stored intracellularly as thioferrate-like nanoparticles. Fe(II) transporters and storage proteins were upregulated in FeS 2 -grown cells. These responses are interpreted to result from cells incorrectly sensing Fe(II) limitation due to assimilation of Fe(II) as FeS aq . These findings have implications for our understanding of how Fe/S availability influences methanogen physiology and the biogeochemical cycling of these elements.

Pyrite (FeS2) has a very low solubility and therefore has historically been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) and unavailable to biology in the absence of oxygen and oxidative weathering. Anaerobic methanogens were recently shown to reduce FeS2 and assimilate Fe and S reduction products to meet nutrient demands. However, the mechanism of FeS2 mineral reduction and the forms of Fe and S assimilated by methanogens remained unclear. Thermodynamic calculations described herein indicate that H2 at aqueous concentrations as low as 10–10 M favors the reduction of FeS2, with sulfide (HS–) and pyrrhotite (Fe1– x S) as products; abiotic laboratory experiments confirmed the reduction of FeS2 with dissolved H2 concentrations greater than 1.98 × 10–4 M H2. Growth studies of Methanosarcina barkeri provided with FeS2 as the sole source of Fe and S resulted in H2 production but at concentrations too low to drive abiotic FeS2 reduction, based on abiotic laboratory experimental data. A strain of M. barkeri with deletions in all [NiFe]-hydrogenases maintained the ability to reduce FeS2 during growth, providing further evidence that extracellular electron transport (EET) to FeS2 does not involve H2 or [NiFe]-hydrogenases. Physical contact between cells and FeS2 was required for mineral reduction but was not required to obtain Fe and S from dissolution products. The addition of a synthetic electron shuttle, anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, allowed for biological reduction of FeS2 when physical contact between cells and FeS2 was prohibited, indicating that exogenous electron shuttles can mediate FeS2 reduction. Transcriptomics experiments revealed upregulation of several cytoplasmic oxidoreductases during growth of M. barkeri on FeS2, which may indicate involvement in provisioning low potential electrons for EET to FeS2. Collectively, the data presented herein indicate that reduction of insoluble FeS2 by M. barkeri occurred via electron transfer from the cell surface to the mineral surface resulting in the generation of soluble HS– and mineral-associated Fe1– x S. Solubilized Fe(II), but not HS–, from mineral-associated Fe1– x S reacts with aqueous HS– yielding aqueous iron sulfur clusters (FeS aq ) that likely serve as the Fe and S source for methanogen growth and activity. FeS aq nucleation and subsequent precipitation on the surface of cells may result in accelerated EET to FeS2, resulting in positive feedback between cell activity and FeS2 reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]