Search

Aim: Statins can induce pharmacologic preconditioning and thereby reduce infarct size. Cellular phosphatidylserine (PS) exposition occurs in the course of ischaemia and reperfusion and has been associated with injury. In this experiment we studied the effect of atorvastatin on PS exposition after a standardised ischaemia and reperfusion challenge., Methods: In a double-blind randomised cross-over trial 30 healthy volunteers were allocated to 3 day treatment with atorvastatin (80 mg/day) and placebo (n = 24), or placebo treatment twice (n = 6). At the end of each treatment period, volunteers underwent 10 minutes of forearm ischaemic exercise. At reperfusion radiolabeled annexin A5 was administered intravenously and Gamma camera imaging of both hands was performed 1 and 4 hours after reperfusion., Results: Annexin A5 targeting was not different between atorvastatin treatment (26.1 ± 9.8% and 24.0 ± 9.5% respectively at 1 and 4 hours after reperfusion) and placebo treatment (25.6 ± 11.0% and 24.5 ± 10.7%) (p = 0.99). Our time control experiment did not reveal a carry-over effect., Conclusions: Our results show that treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg does not reduce forearm PS exposition after ischaemic exercise. This suggests that the role of PS exposure in the prevention of ischemia and reperfusion injury by short term treatment with atorvastatin is limited.

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Although originally developed to improve lipid profile, statins have demonstrated a surplus of beneficial pleiotropic effects, including improved endothelial function, reduced inflammation, and increased tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion injury. In preclinical studies, increased ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity, the key enzyme in extracellular adenosine formation, plays an important role in these effects. Because human data are absent, we explored the effects of rosuvastatin on ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity and the clinical relevance of increased extracellular adenosine during ischemia in humans in vivo. The forearm vasodilator responses to 3 increasing periods of forearm ischemia (2, 5, and 13 minutes) were determined during placebo and caffeine (an adenosine receptor antagonist) infusion into the brachial artery. At the end of an 8-day treatment period with rosuvastatin (20 mg per day), this whole procedure was repeated. During both experiments, ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity was determined. Vasodilator responses are expressed as the percentage increase in forearm blood flow ratio from baseline. Rosuvastatin increased ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity by 49±17% and enhanced the vasodilator response after 2, 5, and 13 minutes of ischemia in the absence (146±19, 330±26, and 987±133 to 312±77, 566±107, and 1533±267) but not in the presence of caffeine (98±25, 264±54, and 727±111 versus 95±19, 205±34, and 530±62). Rosuvastatin increases extracellular formation of adenosine in humans in vivo probably by enhancing ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity. This action results in the improvement of reactive hyperemia and may further enhance the clinical benefit of statins, in particular in conditions of ischemia.

Ischaemia, like muscle contraction, has been reported to induce skeletal muscle glucose uptake in in vitro models. This stimulating effect appears independent of insulin and is probably mediated by activation of AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase). In the present study, we hypothesized that in vivo in humans ischaemia- and insulin-induced glucose uptake are additive, and that the combined impact of ischaemia and contraction on glucose uptake is of a similar magnitude when each is applied separately. We assessed the effects of ischaemia with and without euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemia (clamp; protocol 1) and with and without muscle contraction (protocol 2) on muscle FGU (forearm glucose uptake) in healthy subjects. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of ischaemia on FBF (forearm blood flow; plethysmography). In protocol 1, ischaemia increased FGU from 0.6+/-0.1 at baseline to 5.5+/-1.9 micromol x min(-1) x dl(-1), and insulin increased FGU to 1.6+/-0.3 micromol x min(-1) x dl(-1) (P<0.05 for both). The combination of ischaemia+insulin increased FGU to 15.5+/-2.2 micromol x min(-1) x dl(-1) (P<0.05 compared with each stimulus alone). Maximal FBF obtained after ischaemia was similar with and without hyperinsulinaemia. In protocol 2, isometric contraction increased FGU from 0.3+/-0.1 to 2.7+/-0.8 micromol x min(-1) x dl(-1) (P<0.05), but FGU was not significantly different from ischaemia compared with ischaemia+contraction. However, combined ischaemia+contraction resulted in a greater increase in FBF. In summary, ischaemia and insulin independently stimulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake in vivo in humans, whereas ischaemia and contraction do not. The observed differential effects of these stimuli on glucose uptake appear to be unrelated to changes in muscle blood flow.

Background: Nonlethal ischemia and reperfusion reduce ischemia-reperfusion-induced cell death, a phenomenon called ischemic preconditioning. In animal models, this potent endogenous protection is mimicked in vivo by administration of adenosine. In humans, exploitation of ischemic preconditioning is hindered by the lack of an appropriate in vivo model to study this phenomenon. To solve this problem, we aimed to set up an easy-to-use human in vivo model to study ischemic or pharmacological preconditioning., Methods and Results: Healthy male volunteers performed unilateral ischemic handgrip. At reperfusion, we intravenously injected technetium-99m-labeled Annexin A5, a presumed marker of ischemic injury, and we imaged both forearms and hands simultaneously with a gamma camera. Region of interest analysis (counts per pixel) and subsequent calculation of the percentage difference in radioactivity between experimental and control hands (thenar muscle; mean+/-SE) revealed significant uptake to the ischemically exercised tissue (26+/-3% at 4 hours after reperfusion; P<0.05). This selective localization of Annexin A5 was reduced by ischemic preconditioning (10 minutes of ischemia plus reperfusion before ischemic exercise) or by infusion of adenosine into the brachial artery to 6+/-1% and 10+/-3%, respectively (P<0.05 versus ischemic exercise alone), resembling observations in animal models with infarct size as an end point. Appropriate control experiments supported our conclusion., Conclusions: Annexin A5 scintigraphy can be applied to test pharmacological or physiological interventions for their ability to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background: In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), cardiovascular events are more common, and the outcome following a myocardial infarction is worse than in nondiabetic subjects. Ischemic or pharmacological preconditioning are powerful interventions to reduce ischemia reperfusion (IR)-injury. However, animal studies have shown that the presence of T1DM can limit these protective effects. Therefore, we aimed to study the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning in patients with T1DM, and to explore the role of plasma insulin and glucose on this effect. Methods: 99mTechnetium-annexin A5 scintigraphy was used to detect IR-injury. IR-injury was induced by unilateral forearm ischemic exercise. At reperfusion, Tc-annexin A5 was administered, and IR-injury was expressed as the percentage difference in radioactivity in the thenar muscle between the experimental and control arm 4 hours after reperfusion. 15 patients with T1DM were compared to 21 nondiabetic controls. The patients were studied twice, with or without ischemic preconditioning (10 minutes of forearm ischemia and reperfusion). Patients were studied in either normoglycemic hyperinsulinemic conditions (n = 8) or during hyperglycemic normoinsulinemia (n = 7). The controls were studied once either with (n = 8) or without (n= 13) ischemic preconditioning. Results: Patients with diabetes were less vulnerable to IR-injury than nondiabetic healthy controls (12.8 ± 2.4 and 11.0 ± 5.1% versus 27.5 ± 4.5% in controls; p < 0.05). The efficacy of ischemic preconditioning to reduce IR-injury, however, was lower in the patients and was even completely abolished during hyperglycemia. Conclusions: Patients with T1DM are more tolerant to forearm IR than healthy controls in our experimental model. The efficacy of ischemic preconditioning to limit IR-injury, however, is reduced by acute hyperglycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In animal models, administration of the adenosine analog AICA-riboside has shown beneficial effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury and glucose homeostasis. The vascular and/or metabolic effects of AICA-riboside administration in humans remain to be established. AICA-riboside was infused intra-arterially in four different dosages up to 8 mg∙min-1∙dl-1 in 24 healthy subjects. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and glucose uptake and plasma glucose, free fatty acid, and AICAriboside concentrations were assessed. We also combined AICAriboside infusion (2 mg∙min-1∙dl-1) with the intra-arterial administration of the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (90 μg∙min-1∙dl-1; n = 6) and with the endothelial NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA (0.4 mg∙min-1∙dl-1; n = 6). Additional in vitro experiments were performed to explain our in vivo effects of AICA-riboside in humans. AICA-riboside increased FBF dose dependently from 2.0 ± 0.2 to 13.2 ± 1.9 ml∙min-1∙dl-1 maximally (P < 0.05 for all dosages). The latter was not reduced by caffeine administration but was significantly attenuated by L-NMMA infusion. Despite high plasma AICA-riboside concentrations, forearm glucose uptake did not change. In vitro experiments showed rapid uptake of AICA-riboside by the equilibrative nucleoside transporter in erythrocytes and subsequent phosphorylation to AICA-ribotide. We conclude that AICA-riboside induces a potent vasodilator response in humans that is mediated by NO. Despite high local plasma concentrations, AICA-riboside does not increase skeletal muscle glucose uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adenosine receptor stimulation induces several effects that could limit ischemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesize that treatment with the nucleoside uptake inhibitor dipyridamole increases endogenous adenosine and limits ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans. Methods: Ischemia-reperfusion injury was studied in forearm skeletal muscle by technetium Tc 99m-labeled annexin A5 scintigraphy. Ischemia-reperfusion injury was induced by unilateral forearm ischemic exercise. Immediately on reperfusion, annexin A5 labeled with technetium Tc 99m was administered intravenously, and ischemia-reperfusion injury was expressed as the percentage difference in radioactivity between the experimental arm and the control arm 1 and 4 hours after reperfusion. Targeting was quantified in the region of the thenar muscle and forearm flexor muscles. This approach was used in 9 healthy male volunteers after a 1-week treatment with dipyridamole (200 mg, slow release, twice daily) and in 23 control subjects. Results: Dipyridamole treatment significantly reduced annexin A5 targeting in skeletal muscle compared with the control group (thenar region, 13% ± 7% versus 22% ± 15% at 1 hour after reperfusion and 9% ± 6% versus 27% ± 13% at 4 hours for dipyridamole and control groups, respectively [P = .01]; flexor region, 4% ± 8% versus 7% ± 6% at 1 hour after reperfusion and 1% ± 4% versus 10% ± 9% at 4 hours for dipyridamole and control groups, respectively [P = .01]). Conclusions: One week of oral treatment with the nucleoside uptake inhibitor dipyridamole (200 mg, slow release, twice daily) significantly limits ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans in vivo, as assessed by technetium Tc 99m-labeled annexin A5 scintigraphy of forearm skeletal muscle. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Examines the role of myocardial K [sub ATP] channel blockade in the effects of glibenclamide against ischemia in the heart. Effects of opening the K [sub ATP] channels on the postischemic heart function; Role of glibenclamide in the coronary vasculature; Reduction of the cardiac functional loss due to glibenclamide.

This study determined whether insulin at pre- (fasting) and post-prandial concentrations increases coronary blood flow and improves cardiac function after acute ischemia during a situation of myocardial stunning. The experiments were performed using an isolated, erythrocyte perfused, working rat heart model. To the perfusate we added erythrocytes and 1.5% bovine serum albumin to improve clinical relevance. The following protocol was used: 8 min baseline performance assessment, 10 min pre-ischemic treatment, 12 min global ischemia, 20 min post-ischemic treatment and 8 min recovery assessment. Vehicle, 10 mIU l−1 and 100 mIU l−1 human insulin were tested (all n=6). No significant vasodilator response to insulin was observed either pre- or post-ischemically. After the 12-min ischemic insult, cardiac function returned dose-dependently to pre-ischemic values (function loss with 100 mIU l−1 insulin: −0.2±0.4% vs. vehicle: 10.7±0.8%). This study clearly shows that in our clinically relevant model of moderate ischemia (stunning), insulin is highly cardioprotective at physiological concentrations. This may be explained primarily by higher glucose uptake, improving the myocardial energetic state during ischemia. Therefore, insulin should be considered for use when the myocardium is at acute risk for ischemic incidents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]