Search

Objectives: This study assessed the predictive value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for cerebrovascular events (CVE) in an asymptomatic multiethnic cohort., Background: The CAC score, a measure of atherosclerotic burden, has been shown to improve prediction of coronary heart disease events. However, the predictive value of CAC for CVE is unclear., Methods: CAC was measured at baseline examination of participants (N = 6,779) of MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and then followed for an average of 9.5 ± 2.4 years for the diagnosis of incident CVE, defined as all strokes or transient ischemic attacks., Results: During the follow-up, 234 (3.5%) adjudicated CVE occurred. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of CAC was associated with a lower CVE event-free survival versus the absence of CAC (log-rank chi-square: 59.8, p < 0.0001). Log-transformed CAC was associated with increased risk for CVE after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, cigarette smoking status, blood pressure medication use, statin use, and interim atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 to 1.20], p < 0.0001). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association-recommended CAC cutoff was also an independent predictor of CVE and strokes (HR: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.24 to 2.35], p = 0.001, and HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 1.11 to 2.27], p = 0.01, respectively). CAC was an independent predictor of CVE when analysis was stratified by sex or race/ethnicity and improved discrimination for CVE when added to the full model (c-statistic: 0.744 vs. 0.755). CAC also improved the discriminative ability of the Framingham stroke risk score for CVE., Conclusions: CAC is an independent predictor of CVE and improves the discrimination afforded by current stroke risk factors or the Framingham stroke risk score for incident CVE in an initially asymptomatic multiethnic adult cohort., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary stroke prevention in the elderly in many cases requires the use of drug therapy to maximize risk factor control. However, the elderly (≥65 years) are most likely to receive care that is not evidence-based, because of concerns for adverse events. In this review, we provide evidence to the practitioner in support of the value of blood pressure control with drug therapy to decrease recurrent stroke risk. This review also highlights evidence for the importance of statin therapy in stroke prevention among the elderly. Finally, the appropriate use of antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation is addressed.