Search

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is contraindicated in patients with ischaemic stroke with blood pressure higher than 185/110 mm Hg. Prevailing guidelines recommend to actively lower blood pressure with intravenous antihypertensive agents to allow for thrombolysis; however, there is no robust evidence for this strategy. Because rapid declines in blood pressure can also adversely affect clinical outcomes, several Dutch stroke centres use a conservative strategy that does not involve the reduction of blood pressure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of both strategies., Methods: Thrombolysis and Uncontrolled Hypertension (TRUTH) was a prospective, observational, cluster-based, parallel-group study conducted across 37 stroke centres in the Netherlands. Participating centres had to strictly adhere to an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy or to a non-lowering strategy. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke who had blood pressure higher than 185/110 mm Hg but were otherwise eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. The primary outcome was functional status at 90 days, measured using the modified Rankin Scale and assessed through telephone interviews by trained research nurses. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, the proportion of patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and door-to-needle time. All ordinal logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, endovascular thrombectomy, and baseline imbalances as fixed-effect variables and centre as a random-effect variable to account for the clustered design. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle, whereby all patients were analysed according to the treatment strategy of the participating centre at which they were treated., Findings: Recruitment began on Jan 1, 2015, and was prematurely halted because of a declining inclusion rate and insufficient funding on Jan 5, 2022. Between these dates, we recruited 853 patients from 27 centres that followed an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy and 199 patients from ten centres that followed a non-lowering strategy. Baseline characteristics of participants from the two groups were similar. The 90-day mRS score was missing for 15 patients. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for a shift towards a worse 90-day functional outcome was 1·27 (95% CI 0·96-1·68) for active blood-pressure reduction compared with no active blood-pressure reduction. 798 (94%) of 853 patients in the active blood-pressure-lowering group were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, with a median door-to-needle time of 35 min (IQR 25-52), compared with 104 (52%) of 199 patients treated in the non-lowering group with a median time of 47 min (29-78). 42 (5%) of 852 patients in the active blood-pressure-lowering group had a symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage compared with six (3%) of 199 of those in the non-lowering group (aOR 1·28 [95% CI 0·62-2·62])., Interpretation: Insufficient evidence was available to establish a difference between an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy-in which antihypertensive agents were administered to reduce blood pressure below 185/110 mm Hg-and a non-lowering strategy for the functional outcomes of patients with ischaemic stroke, despite higher intravenous thrombolysis rates and shorter door-to-needle times among those in the active blood-pressure-lowering group. Randomised controlled trials are needed to inform the use of an active blood-pressure-lowering strategy., Funding: Fonds NutsOhra., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DWJD reports unrestricted research grants from Stryker Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, and Thrombolytic Science, all paid to his institution; and is chair of the data safety monitoring boards of the Act Global and LATE MT trials and a work package of the CONTRAST consortium. HBvdW reports research grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation (via the CONTRAST consortium), the European Commission, Stryker (via the CONTRAST consortium), Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from TargED Biopharmaceuticals, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and honoraria for presentations from the Netherlands Vascular Forum, all paid to his institution; is chair of the data safety monitoring board of the Ghrelin in Coma (GRECO) trial and a member of the advisory board of the TENSION trial; and is on the executive committee of—and is a past president of—the European Stroke Organisation. MJHW reports participation on the data safety monitoring board of the TRIDENT trial. YBWEMR is a minor shareholder of Nicolab. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Differences in clinical presentation of acute ischemic stroke between men and women may affect prehospital identification of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (aLVO). We assessed sex differences in diagnostic performance of 8 prehospital scales to detect aLVO., Methods: We analyzed pooled individual patient data from 2 prospective cohort studies (LPSS [Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study] and PRESTO [Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Study]) conducted in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2019, including consecutive patients ≥18 years suspected of acute stroke who presented within 6 hours after symptom onset. Ambulance paramedics assessed clinical items from 8 prehospital aLVO detection scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity, gaze-face-arm-speech-time, Conveniently Grasped Field Assessment Stroke Triage, and Face-Arm-Speech-Time Plus Severe Arm or Leg Motor Deficit. We assessed the diagnostic performance of these scales for identifying aLVO at prespecified cut points for men and women., Results: Of 2358 patients with suspected stroke (median age, 73 years; 47% women), 231 (10%) had aLVO (100/1114 [9%] women and 131/1244 [11%] men). The area under the curve of the scales ranged from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) in women versus 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.73) to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in men. Positive predictive values ranged from 0.23 (95% CI, 0.20-0.27) to 0.29 (95% CI, 0.26-0.31) in women versus 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.33) to 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43) in men. Negative predictive values were similar (0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96] to 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.98] in women versus 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] in men). Sensitivity of the scales was slightly higher in women than in men (0.53 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84] versus 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.57] to 0.63 [95% CI, 0.55-0.73]), whereas specificity was lower (0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81] to 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84-0.89] versus 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.84] to 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.91]). Rapid arterial occlusion evaluation showed the highest positive predictive values in both sexes (0.29 in women and 0.37 in men), reflecting the different event rates., Conclusions: aLVO scales show similar diagnostic performance in both sexes. The rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale may help optimize prehospital transport decision-making in men as well as in women with suspected stroke., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Wermer reports receiving Clinical Established Investigator grant 2016T086 from the Dutch Heart Foundation and VIDI grant 9171337 from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) during the conduct of the original LPSS (Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study). Dr Kruyt reports receiving grant HA20 15.01.02 from the Dutch Brain Foundation, grant 3.240 from the Dutch Innovation Funds, and grant LSHM16041 from Health-Holland during the conduct of the study. Dr Roozenbeek reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) during the conduct of this study, paid to the institution. Dr Dippel reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health-Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc, Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, LLC, and Cerenovus for research, all paid to institution outside the submitted work. Dr van den Wijngaard reports compensation from Philips for consultant services, compensation from Medtronic for consultant services, and stock holdings in Neurophyxia BV. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background and Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is standard treatment for anterior large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO-a stroke). Prehospital diagnosis of LVO-a stroke would reduce time to EVT by allowing direct transportation to an EVT-capable hospital. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dry electrode EEG for the detection of LVO-a stroke in the prehospital setting., Methods: ELECTRA-STROKE was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, diagnostic study, performed in the prehospital setting. Adult patients were eligible if they had suspected stroke (as assessed by the attending ambulance nurse) and symptom onset <24 hours. A single dry electrode EEG recording (8 electrodes) was performed by ambulance personnel. Primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of the theta/alpha frequency ratio for LVO-a stroke (intracranial ICA, A1, M1, or proximal M2 occlusion) detection among patients with EEG data of sufficient quality, expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints were diagnostic accuracies of other EEG features quantifying frequency band power and the pairwise derived Brain Symmetry Index. Neuroimaging was assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded to EEG results., Results: Between August 2020 and September 2022, 311 patients were included. The median EEG duration time was 151 (interquartile range [IQR] 151-152) seconds. For 212/311 (68%) patients, EEG data were of sufficient quality for analysis. The median age was 74 (IQR 66-81) years, 90/212 (42%) were women, and the median baseline NIH Stroke Scale was 1 (IQR 0-4). Six (3%) patients had an LVO-a stroke, 109/212 (51%) had a non-LVO-a ischemic stroke, 32/212 (15%) had a transient ischemic attack, 8/212 (4%) had a hemorrhagic stroke, and 57/212 (27%) had a stroke mimic. AUC of the theta/alpha ratio was 0.80 (95% CI 0.58-1.00). Of the secondary endpoints, the pairwise derived Brain Symmetry Index in the delta frequency band had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.00], sensitivity 80% [95% CI 38%-96%], specificity 93% [95% CI 88%-96%], positive likelihood ratio 11.0 [95% CI 5.5-21.7])., Discussion: The data from this study suggest that dry electrode EEG has the potential to detect LVO-a stroke among patients with suspected stroke in the prehospital setting. Toward future implementation of EEG in prehospital stroke care, EEG data quality needs to be improved., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03699397., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that prehospital dry electrode scalp EEG accurately detects LVO-a stroke among patients with suspected acute stroke.

Background: Pooled analyses of previous randomised studies have suggested that very early treatment with glyceryl trinitrate (also known as nitroglycerin) improves functional outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, but this finding was not confirmed in a more recent trial (RIGHT-2). We aimed to assess whether patients with presumed acute stroke benefit from glyceryl tr initrate started within 3 h after symptom onset., Methods: MR ASAP was a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial done at six ambulance services serving 18 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had a probable diagnosis of acute stroke (as assessed by a paramedic), a face-arm-speech-time test score of 2 or 3, systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg, and could start treatment within 3 h of symptom onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by ambulance personnel, using a secure web-based electronic application with random block sizes stratified by ambulance service, to receive either transdermal glyceryl trinitrate 5 mg/day for 24 h plus standard care (glyceryl trinitrate group) or to standard care alone (control group) in the prehospital setting. Informed consent was deferred until after arrival at the hospital. The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included death within 7 days, death within 90 days, and serious adverse events. Analyses were based on modified intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. We separately analysed the total population and the target population (ie, patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, or transient ischaemic attack). The target sample size was 1400 patients. The trial is registered as ISRCTN99503308., Findings: On June 24, 2021, the MR ASAP trial was prematurely terminated on the advice of the data and safety monitoring board, with recruitment stopped because of safety concerns in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. Between April 4, 2018, and Feb 12, 2021, 380 patients were randomly allocated to a study group. 325 provided informed consent or died before consent could be obtained, of whom 170 were assigned to the glyceryl trinitrate group and 155 to the control group. These patients were included in the total population. 201 patients (62%) had ischaemic stroke, 34 (10%) transient ischaemic attack, 56 (17%) intracerebral haemorrhage, and 34 (10%) a stroke-mimicking condition. In the total population (n=325), the median mRS score at 90 days was 2 (IQR 1-4) in both the glyceryl trinitrate and control groups (adjusted common OR 0·97 [95% CI 0·65-1·47]). In the target population (n=291), the 90-day mRS score was 2 (2-4) in the glyceryl trinitrate group and 3 (1-4) in the control group (0·92 [0·59-1·43]). In the total population, there were no differences between the two study groups with respect to death within 90 days (adjusted OR 1·07 [0·53-2·14]) or serious adverse events (unadjusted OR 1·23 [0·76-1·99]). In patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, 12 (34%) of 35 patients allocated to glyceryl trinitrate versus two (10%) of 21 allocated to the control group died within 7 days (adjusted OR 5·91 [0·78-44·81]); death within 90 days occurred in 16 (46%) of 35 in the glyceryl trinitrate group and 11 (55%) of 20 in the control group (adjusted OR 0·87 [0·18-4·17])., Interpretation: We found no sign of benefit of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate started within 3 h of symptom onset in the prehospital setting in patients with presumed acute stroke. The signal of potential early harm of glyceryl trinitrate in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage suggests that glyceryl trinitrate should be avoided in this setting., Funding: The Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and the Dutch Heart Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HR reports financial support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, paid to his institution. BJE reports financial support from Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (via the Top Consortia for Knowledge and Innovation's public–private partnership), paid to his institution; and unpaid board membership of UEMS Neuroradiology and the Dutch Society of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology. CBLMM, DWJD, PJN and HBvdW report funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation and Stryker, all paid to their institutions or the CONTRAST consortium. CBLMM reports financial support from the TWIN Foundation and Health Evaluation Netherlands, all paid to his institution. CBLMM and HBvdW report financial support from the European Commission, all paid to their institutions. CBLMM and YBWEMR are minor shareholders of Nicolab. DWJD reports grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Brain Foundation Netherlands, ZON MW–The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, and Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, all paid to his institution. HBvdW reports honoraria for consultancy from Bayer and LivaNova, all paid to his institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obtaining informed consent for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke can be challenging, and little is known about if and how the informed consent procedure is performed by neurologists in clinical practice. This study examines the procedure of informed consent for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke in high-volume stroke centers in the Netherlands., Methods: In four high volume stroke centers, neurology residents and attending neurologists received an online questionnaire concerning informed consent for thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). The respondents were asked to report their usual informed consent practice for tPA treatment and their considerations on whether informed consent should be obtained., Results: From the 203 invited clinicians, 50% (n = 101) completed the questionnaire. One-third of the neurology residents (n = 21) and 21% of the neurologists (n = 8) reported that they always obtain informed consent for tPA treatment. If a patient is not capable of providing informed consent, 30% of the residents (n = 19) reported that they start tPA treatment without informed consent. In these circumstances, 53% of the neurologists (n = 20) reported that the resident under their supervision would start tPA treatment without informed consent. Most neurologists (n = 21; 55%) and neurology residents (n = 45; 72%) obtained informed consent within one minute. None of the respondents used more than five minutes for informed consent. Important themes regarding obtaining informed consent for treatment were patients' capacity, and medical, ethical and legal considerations., Conclusion: The current practice of informed consent for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke varies among neurologists and neurology residents. If informed consent is obtained, most clinicians stated to obtain informed consent within one minute. In the future, a shortened information provision process may be applied, making a shift from informed consent to informed refusal, while still considering the patient's capacity, stroke severity, and possible treatment delays., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Treatment outside office hours has been associated with increased workflow times for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Limited data suggest that this "off-hours effect" also exists for endovascular treatment (EVT). We investigated this phenomenon in a well-organized acute stroke care region in the Netherlands., Methods: Retrospective, observational cohort study of consecutive patients with AIS who received reperfusion therapy in the Greater Amsterdam Area, consisting of 14 primary stroke centers and 1 comprehensive stroke center (IVT: 2009-2015, EVT: 2014-2017). Office hours were defined as presentation during weekdays between 8 AM and 5 PM, excluding National Festive days. Primary outcome was door-to-treatment time (door-to-needle [DNT] for IVT, door-to-groin [DGT] for EVT). For DGT, we used the door time of the first hospital. Other outcomes were in-hospital mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We performed multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses and used multiple imputation to account for missing values., Results: In total, 59% (2450/4161) and 61% (239/395) of patients treated with IVT and EVT, respectively, presented outside office hours. Median DNT was minimally longer outside office hours (32 vs. 30 min, p = 0.024, adjusted difference 2.5 min, 95% CI 0.7-4.2). Presentation outside office hours was not associated with a longer DGT (median 130 min for both groups, adjusted difference 7.0 min, 95% CI - 4.2 to 18.1). Clinical outcome and sICH rate also did not differ., Conclusion: Presentation outside office hours did not lead to clinically relevant treatment delays for reperfusion therapy in patients with AIS.