Search

We reported the main results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4, a nationwide surveillance of therapy (NET) in Japan from January 2015 to December 2019. JR-NET 4 registered consecutive patients who underwent NETs by Japan Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) -certified specialists. The primary endpoint was functional independence (mRS score of 0-2) at 30 days post-NET, with secondary endpoints focusing on technical success and major adverse events within 30 days.A total of 63,230 patients and 60,354 NET procedures from 166 participating centers were analyzed. During the study period, NET cases have consistently increased, with an increase in the proportion of elderly patients. A significant trend shift was observed in the distribution of NET procedures, with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke that showed a dramatic increase in 5 years. This trend aligns with key randomized clinical trials from 2015 that presented the efficacy of this treatment. Clinical outcomes at 30 days posttreatment revealed that endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke and other NETs maintained safety and effectiveness despite varying prevalence of functional independence between target diseases. The study also observed a steady increase in emergency treatment cases, reflecting the increase in acute ischemic stroke, a time-sensitive medical condition.This comprehensive surveillance highlights the trend of NET practices in Japan, driven by clinical evidence and advancements in treatment devices. Although these findings were specific to Japan, they offer valuable insights into the broader trends in NETs and acute stroke care.

Background: Studies comparing bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with direct endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke who present late are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of bridging IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours after time last known well., Methods: We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6 from 20 centers across 10 countries in the multicenter retrospective CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) between January 2014 and May 2022. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting modeling adjusted for clinical and imaging confounders to compare functional outcomes, reperfusion success, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality between EVT patients with and without prior IVT., Results: Of 5098 patients screened for eligibility, we included 2749 patients, of whom 549 received bridging IVT before EVT. The timing of IVT was not recorded. Witnessed stroke onset and transfer rates were higher in the bridging IVT group (25% versus 12% and 77% versus 55%, respectively, P value for both <0.0001), and time intervals between stroke onset and treatment were shorter (time last known well-start of EVT median 560 minutes [interquartile range, 432-791] versus 724 minutes [interquartile range, 544-912]; P <0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no difference in functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio for modified Rankin Scale shift, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.89-1.19]; P =0.72) or successful reperfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.81-1.75]; P =0.39). There were no safety concerns associated with bridging IVT versus direct EVT (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: adjusted odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.38-1.48]; P =0.40; mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.89-1.46]; P =0.31). Results were unchanged when the analysis was limited to patients who received IVT >6 hours after last known well., Conclusions: In patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours from last known well, bridging IVT was not associated with a difference in outcomes compared with direct EVT., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248., Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs Demeestere and Lemmens reported institutional research fees from Genentech. Dr Strbian reported consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Nogueira reported consultancy for Biogen, Brainomix, Corindus, Cerenovus, Stryker, Medtronic, Ceretrieve, Anaconda, Biomed, Vesalio, Imperative Care, NeuroVasc Technologies, Viz AI, Genentech, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Perfuze, Phenox, RapidPulse; stock options in Viz AI, Vesalio, Perfuze, Corindus, Brainomix, Ceretrieve; grants from Cerenovus and Stryker. Dr Nagel reported consultancy for Brainomix; speaker with Boehringer ingelheim and Pfizer. Dr Yamagami reported research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Otuska Pharmaceutical; advisory board for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Puetz reported lecturer for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Haussen reported consultancy for Vesalio, Cerenovus, Stryker, Brainomix, Poseydon Medical, and Chiesi USA; Data Safety and Monitoring Board from Jacobs Institute; and stock options in Viz AI. Dr Ribo reported consultancy for Medtronic, MiniMed, Cerenovus, AptaTargets, Stryker, Philips; stock holdings in Methinks, Nora, and Anaconda Biomed. Dr Michel reported grants from University of Lausanne and Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF). Dr Marto reported consulting from Amicus Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker with Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Henon reported fees from Novartis and a grant from Sanofi-Aventis. Dr Gutierrez reported consultancy fees from Medtronic, Stryker and Microvention, and a grant from Methinks, Microvention, Stryker and the National Institutes of Health. Dr Siegler reported a grant from Philips and Viz AI. Dr Yoshimura reported research grants from Stryker, Siemens Healthineers, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Teijin Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, HEALIOS, Asahi Kasei Medical, Kowa, CSL Behring; lecturer fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka, Terumo, Biomedical Solutions, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer and Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Dr Sheth reported consultancy for Imperative Care, Viz AI, Penumbra; compensation from Motif Neurosciences; grants from National Institutes of Health. Dr Dobrocky reported consultancy fees from MicroVention. Dr Kaesmacher reported grants from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences/Bangerter Foundation, Swiss Stroke Society, and Clinical Trials Unit Bern. Dr Zaidi reported a grant from Genentech. Dr Castonguay reported employment by Medtronic. Dr Uchida reported fees by Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic and Stryker. Dr Sakai reported research grant from Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, Terumo, TG Medical; lecturer’s fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi Sankyo, Kaneka, Medtronic, Terumo; advisory board for Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Terumo. Dr Toyoda reported lecturer fees from Otsuka, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Kaiser reported grants from the Joachim Herz Foundation. Dr Möhlenbruch reported grants from Medtronic, Stryker, and MicroVention. Dr Ringleb reported travel support from Bayer and Bristol Myers Squibb; consultancy for Daiichi Sankyo Company and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Zaidat reported consultancy fees by Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and Stryker, Penumbra stock, and a grant from Johson & Johnson, Medtronic, Penumbra and Stryker. Dr Fischer reported research support from SNF, Medtronic, Stryker, Rapid Medical, Penumbra, Phenox; consultancies for Stryker, CSL Behring; advisory board for Alexion/Portola, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, Acthera. Dr Nguyen discloses research support from Medtronic to her institution; advisory board for Brainomix, Aruna Bio; Associate Editor Stroke.

Background: We aimed to examine the boundary of the ischemic core volume in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus those receiving medical management to determine the minimum optimal size for favorable treatment outcomes., Methods: This is a prespecified substudy of the RESCUE-Japan LIMIT (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial). Patients with large vessel occlusion were enrolled between November 2018 and September 2021 with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of at least 6 on admission and an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score value of 3 to 5. We investigated the correlation between optimal quantified ischemic core volume, assessed solely using magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging, and functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 90 days by predictive marginal plots. Final infarct volume and safety outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality) were also assessed., Results: Of the 203 cases, 168 patients (85 in the EVT group versus 83 in the medical management group) were included. The median (interquartile range) core volume was 94 (65-160) mL in patients with EVT and 115 (71-141) mL in the medical management group ( P =0.72). The predictive marginal probabilities of the 2 groups intersected at 128 mL for estimating functional outcomes. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality within 90 days had overlay margins through all core volumes in both groups. The median final infarct volume (interquartile range) was smaller in the EVT group (142 [80-223] mL versus 211 [123-289] mL in the medical management group; P <0.001)., Conclusions: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial involving patients with large ischemic strokes, patients with an estimated core volume of up to 128 mL on diffusion-weighted imaging benefit from EVT., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03702413., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Inoue reports the lecturer’s fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Yoshimoto reports lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Toyoda reports lecture fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Yamagami discloses research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb; lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Biomedical Solutions, and Medico’s Hirata; and membership of the advisory boards for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Sakai reports research grants from Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi Sankyo, and Terumo; lecturer’s fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi Sankyo, and Medtronic; and membership on the advisory boards for Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Terumo. Dr Matsumaru reports lecturer fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka, and Jimro. Dr Matsumoto reports the lecturer’s fees from Kaneka, Medico’s Hirata, Fuji systems, GE Healthcare, Otsuka, Takeda, Century Medical, Terumo, Medtronic, and Stryker. Dr Kimura reports research grants from CSL Behring, Eisai, Kyowa Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Teijin, Medtronic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Helios; and lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Takeda, Medtronic, Otsuka, FP, Alexion, Sanofi, CSL Behring, Novartis, Toa Eiyo, Medico’s Hirata, and Helios. Dr Uchida reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Stryker, and Medtronic. Dr Beppu reports manuscript fees from Medicus Shuppan. Dr Sakakibara reports manuscript fees from Medicus Shuppan. Dr Morimoto reports lecturer’s fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Pfizer, and Tsumura; manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; advisory board for Novartis and Teijin. Dr Yoshimura reports research grants from Medico’s Hirata, Medtronic, and Terumo; and lecturer fees from Medtronic, Kaneka, Stryker, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson. The other author reports no conflicts.

Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with cerebral aneurysm who undergo stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has not been established. We aimed to clarify the association between duration of DAPT and incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with cerebral aneurysm., Methods: We registered patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent SACE in 27 hospitals in Japan. Those treated with DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) were eligible for inclusion in a previously reported randomized control trial (RCT). Patients who were ineligible or refused to participate to the RCT were followed-up for 15 months after SACE as the non-RCT cohort. Our study examined both the RCT and non-RCT cohorts. The primary and secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic events., Results: Among the 313 patients registered, 296 were included for analysis (of these, 136 were RCT patients and 160 were non-RCT patients). Patients who were treated with DAPT for more than 6 months (n=191) were classified as the long-term DAPT group. Those treated less than 6 months (n=105) were classified as the short-term group. The incidence of ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the long-term group (2.5 per 100 person-years) and the short-term group (3.2 per 100 person-years); nor did incidence of hemorrhagic events (0.8 and 3.2 per 100 person-years, respectively). The period of DAPT was not significantly associated with incidence rates of ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic events., Conclusions: Duration of DAPT was not associated with the incidence of ischemic stroke in the first 15 months after SACE., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HY reports research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Otsuka Pharmaceutical. and Medico's Hirata. HI reports lecture's fee from Medtronic Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Stryker Jaoan, Terumo, and Asahi Intecc. HO reports research grants from Terumo, Stryker, Medtronic, Medikit, and Kaneka and consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Kaneka, and Asahi Intec. KS reports lecturer’s fees from Medtronic Japan, Kaneka Medix, and Terumo. YM reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sakyo, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, Johnson &Johnson, Kaneka, and Medico’s Hirata. KK reports lecturer’s fees from Kyowa Kirin and Daiichi Sankyo. YM serves in an advisory role for GE Healthcare, Fuji Systems, Medico’s Hirata, and Stryker; he reports patents and royalties from Sumitomo Bakelite and lecturer’s fees from GE Healthcare, Stryker, Medtronic, Medico’s Hirata, Century Medical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Kaneka, and Fuji Systems. TS reports research grants from CANON medical systems, lecturer’s fees from Medtronic, and consulting fees from Kaneka Medix. CS reports research grants from Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, and Terumo and lecturer’s fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, and Terumo; he is also a member of the advisory boards of Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Terumo., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups., Methods: Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A favorable outcome was prespecified as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. The IVT effect was compared between the treatment groups in the WUS and non-WUS with multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: Six hundred thirty-four patients from 2 trials were analyzed; 542 had WUS (191 women, 272 receiving alteplase), and 92 had non-WUS (42 women, 43 receiving alteplase). Overall, no significant interaction was noted between the mode of onset and treatment effect ( P value for interaction=0.796). In patients with WUS, the frequencies of favorable outcomes were 54.8% and 45.5% in the IVT and control groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]). Death occurred in 4.0% and 1.9%, respectively ( P =0.162), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively ( P =0.194). In patients with non-WUS, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes relative to the control (37.2% versus 29.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [0.58-5.37]). One death and one symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported in the IVT group, but none in the control., Conclusions: There was no difference in the effect of IVT between patients with WUS and non-WUS. IVT showed a significant benefit in patients with WUS, while there was insufficient statistical power to detect a substantial benefit in the non-WUS subgroup., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: CRD42020166903., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Ma has consulted for Independent Sector. Dr Ringleb has consulted for Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo Company and reports personal fees from Bayer Healthcare and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Wu reports grants from National Institutes of Health. Dr Schwamm serves as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct to Genentech (late-window thrombolysis) and as a member of steering committee (TIMELESS [A Phase III, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thrombolysis in Imaging-Eligible, Late-Window Patients to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase] NCT03785678); stroke systems of care consultant to the Massachusetts Dept of Public Health; member of a Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB) for Penumbra (MIND NCT03342664) and for Diffusion Pharma PHAST-TSC (Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Trans Sodium Crocetinate [TSC] Administered Onboard Emergency Vehicles for Treatment of Suspected Stroke; NCT03763929); and delivering continuing medical education lectures for Boehringer Ingelheim and Prime Education: stroke systems of care and improving time to thrombolysis. Dr Warach has consulted for Genentech. Dr Davis reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Donnan has consulted for Amgen. Dr Gerloff has consulted for Abbott Canada, Allergan, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare, and Boehringer Ingelheim and reports grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, European Union, Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung, Merz Farmaceutica Comercial LTDA, and Schilling-Stiftung. Dr Thomalla has consulted for Acandis, Bayer, PORTOLA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, and Stryker and reports personal fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Amarin Pharma Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH. Dr Kitazono reports grant from Daiichi Sankyo Company LTD. Dr Toyoda has consulted for Otsuka Pharmaceutical and reports personal fees from Abbott Japan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis. Dr Koga has consulted for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Pfizer, and reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo Company LTD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co Ltd. The other authors report no conflicts.

Although low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for patients at high risk of bleeding complications, it remains unclear whether the dose reduction in real-world setting is also appropriate in patients after large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. This study hypothesized that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and LVO receiving low-dose DOACs have an increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic events. The study aimed to assess 1 year morbidity and mortality in patients treated with standard-dose and low-dose apixaban after LVO stroke. A post hoc analysis was performed using the acute LVO registry data, which enrolled patients with AF and LVO who received apixaban within 14 days of stroke onset. The incidences of ischemic events (ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, and systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and death from any cause were compared between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. Of 643 patients diagnosed with LVO, 307 (47.7%) received low-dose apixaban. After adjustment for clinically relevant variables, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-6.02), major bleeding events (aHR: 1.17, 95% CI 0.50-2.73), and death from any cause (aHR: 1.95, 95% CI 0.78-4.89) between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events, major bleeding events, or death from any cause between patients with AF and LVO receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The neonatal brain is substantially more resistant to various forms of injury than the mature brain. For instance, the prognosis following ischemic stroke is generally poor in the elderly but favorable in neonates. Identifying the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying reparative activities in the neonatal brain after ischemic injury may provide feasible targets for therapeutic interventions in adults. To this end, we compared the reparative activities in postnatal day 13 and adult (8-12-week-old) mouse brain following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immunohistochemistry revealed considerably greater generation of ischemia-induced neural stem/progenitor cells (iNSPCs) expressing nestin or Sox2 in ischemic areas of the neonatal brain. The iNSPCs isolated from the neonatal brain also demonstrated greater proliferative activity than those isolated from adult mice. In addition, genes associated with neuronal differentiation were enriched in iNSPCs isolated from the neonatal brain according to microarray and gene ontogeny analyses. Immunohistochemistry further revealed considerably greater production of newborn doublecortin + neurons at the sites of ischemic injury in the neonatal brain compared to the adult brain. These findings suggest that greater iNSPC generation and neurogenic differentiation capacities contribute to the superior regeneration of the neonatal brain following ischemia. Together, our findings may help identify therapeutic targets for enhancing the reparative potential of the adult brain following stroke.

Background: The association between sex and outcome after endovascular thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between men and women treated with endovascular thrombectomy in the late 6-to-24-hour window period., Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy of anterior circulation stroke in the late window from 66 clinical sites in 10 countries from January 2014 to May 2022. The primary outcome was the 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale score. Secondary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (FI), return of Rankin (RoR) to prestroke baseline, FI or RoR, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Multivariable and inverse probability of treatment weighting methods were used. We explored the interaction of sex with baseline characteristics on the outcomes ordinal modified Rankin Scale and FI or RoR., Results: Of 1932 patients, 1055 were women and 877 were men. Women were older (77 versus 69 years), had higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and greater prestroke disability, but there was no difference in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed no difference between women and men in ordinal modified Rankin Scale (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.79-1.21]), FI or RoR (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.78-1.22]), severe disability or mortality (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80-1.23]). The multivariable analysis of the above end points was concordant. There were no interactions between baseline characteristics and sex on the outcomes of ordinal modified Rankin Scale and FI or RoR., Conclusions: In late presenting patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy in the 6 to 24-hour window, there was no difference in clinical or safety outcomes between men and women., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Castonguay reports employment by Medtronic. Dr Cordonnier reports compensation from the University of Glasgow for data and safety monitoring services; employment by the University of Lille; compensation from Biogen for consultant services. Dr Fischer reports employment by Universität Basel; compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim and Biogen for expert witness services. Dr Dobrocky reported MicroVention consultancy. Dr Haussen reports compensation from Vesalio, Cerenovus, Chiesi USA, Inc, Stryker, Brainomix, and Poseydon Medical for consultant services; stock options in Viz.ai; compensation from Jacobs Institute for data and safety monitoring services. Dr Henon reports grants from Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. Dr Kaesmacher reports grants from Swiss National Science Foundation to other. Dr Kaiser reported grants from Joachim Herz Foundation. Martinez-Majander reported grants from Finnish Medical Foundation. Dr Marto reported consulting from Amicus Therapeutics and Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker with Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Michel reports grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, and the University of Lausanne to other. Dr Möhlenbruch reports grants from Medtronic, MicroVention, Inc, and Stryker to other. Dr Nagel reports compensation from Brainomix for consultant services. Dr Nguyen discloses research support from Medtronic, Society of Vascular, and Interventional Neurology to her institution; advisory board compensation from Idorsia, Brainomix; Associate Editor of Stroke. Dr Nogueira reported consultancy for Biogen, Brainomix, Corindus, Cerenovus, Stryker, Medtronic, Ceretrieve, Anaconda, Biomed, Vesalio, Imperative Care, NeuroVasc Technologies, Viz.ai, Genentech, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Perfuze, Phenox, RapidPulse; stock options Viz.ai, Vesalio, Perfuze, Corindus, Brainomix, Ceretrieve; grants from Cerenovus, Stryker; Dr Nogueira reports compensation from Philips for consultant services; stock holdings in Quantanosis AI; compensation from Synchron for data and safety monitoring services; stock holdings in Piraeus Medical; stock options in Viseon, Inc; compensation from Hybernia for consultant services; stock options in Reist/Q’Apel Medical; stock options in Cerebrotech; compensation from Astrocyte and Cerebrotech for consultant services; stock holdings in Brain4Care; stock options in Truvic. Dr Ortega-Gutierrez reports compensation from MicroVention, Inc, Medtronic, and Stryker for consultant services; grants from Stryker, National Institutes of Health, methinks, Siemens, and MicroVention, Inc; and employment by Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa. Dr Puetz reported as lecturer for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Puri reports compensation from Medtronic, Stryker, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc, and MicroVention, Inc, for consultant services. Dr Ribo reports compensation from Philips, Stryker Corporation, Cerenovus, Medtronic MiniMed, Inc, and AptaTargets for consultant services; stock holdings in Anaconda Biomed, Methinks, and Nora. Dr Ringleb reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company and Boehringer Ingelheim for consultant services; employment by Heidelberg University Hospital; travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Bayer Healthcare. Dr Sakai reports compensation from Stryker, Asahi Intecc Co, Ltd, Terumo, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group, Latin America, L.L.C., Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd, and Kaneka Medics for other services; grants from Medtronic; grants from Terumo. Dr Sheth reports compensation from Motif Neurosciences for other services; compensation from Viz.ai, Imperative Care, Inc, and Penumbra, Inc, for consultant services; grants from National Institutes of Health; employment by UTHealth McGovern Medical School. Dr Strbian reports employment by Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri. Dr Uchida reports compensation from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Stryker, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd, and Medtronic for other services. Dr Wouters reports grants from The Research Foundation-Flanders travel and Remmert Adriaan-Laan-Fonds. Dr Yamagami reports compensation from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson and Johnson, Bayer. Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd, and Stryker for other services; grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Yoshimura reports compensation from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group, Latin America, LLC, Bayer, Kaneka Medics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic Daiichi Sankyo Company, Stryker, and Terumo for other services. S. Ning discloses research support from Society for Interventional Radiology. Dr Zaidat reports grants from Medtronic, Penumbra, Inc, Johnson and Johnson, Stryker to other; compensation from Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc, and Penumbra, Inc, for consultant services; stock holdings in Penumbra Inc. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after insular stroke might arise from autonomic and inflammatory mechanisms triggered by insular damage, and be associated with a low embolic risk. We assessed the association of the timing of AF detection and insular involvement with the risk of embolic events after acute ischemic stroke., Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients with AF who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging at baseline were enrolled. Patients were classified according to the timing of AF detection (AF detected after stroke [AFDAS] or known AF [KAF]) and insular involvement. The primary outcome was embolic events defined as recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism within 90 days., Results: Of 1,548 patients, 360 had AFDAS with insular cortex lesions (+I), 409 had AFDAS without insular cortex lesions (-I), 349 had KAF+I, and 430 had KAF-I. Cumulative incidence rates of embolic events at 90 days in patients with AFDAS+I, AFDAS-I, KAF+I, and KAF-I were 0.8%, 3.5%, 4.9%, and 3.3%, respectively. Patients with AFDAS-I (adjusted hazard ratio 5.04, 95% confidence interval 1.43-17.75), KAF+I (6.18, 1.78-21.46), and KAF-I (5.26, 1.48-18.69) had a significantly higher risk of embolic events than those with AFDAS+I., Interpretation: Acute ischemic stroke patients with AFDAS and insular cortex lesions had a lower risk of embolic events than those who had AFDAS without insular cortex lesions or those with KAF, regardless of insular involvement. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:338-346., (© 2023 American Neurological Association.)

Importance: Cell therapy is a promising treatment approach for stroke and other diseases. However, it is unknown whether MultiStem (HLCM051), a bone marrow-derived, allogeneic, multipotent adult progenitor cell product, has the potential to treat ischemic stroke., Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of MultiStem when administered within 18 to 36 hours of ischemic stroke onset., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Treatment Evaluation of Acute Stroke Using Regenerative Cells (TREASURE) multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 44 academic and clinical centers in Japan between November 15, 2017, and March 29, 2022. Inclusion criteria were age 20 years or older, presence of acute ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of 8-20 at baseline), confirmed acute infarction involving the cerebral cortex and measuring more than 2 cm on the major axis (determined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging), and a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 before stroke onset. Data analysis was performed between May 9 and August 15, 2022., Exposure: Patients were randomly assigned to either intravenous MultiStem in 1 single unit of 1.2 billion cells or intravenous placebo within 18 to 36 hours of ischemic stroke onset., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were safety and excellent outcome at day 90, measured as a composite of a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or less, a NIHSS score of 1 or less, and a Barthel index score of 95 or greater. The secondary end points were excellent outcome at day 365, mRS score distribution at days 90 and 365, and mRS score of 0 to 1 and 0 to 2 at day 90. Statistical analysis of efficacy was performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test., Results: This study included 206 patients (104 received MultiStem and 102 received placebo). Their mean age was 76.5 (range, 35-95) years, and more than half of patients were men (112 [54.4%]). There were no between-group differences in primary and secondary end points. The proportion of excellent outcomes at day 90 did not differ significantly between the MultiStem and placebo groups (12 [11.5%] vs 10 [9.8%], P = .90; adjusted risk difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -7.3% to 8.3%]). The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, intravenous administration of allogeneic cell therapy within 18 to 36 hours of ischemic stroke onset was safe but did not improve short-term outcomes. Further research is needed to determine whether MultiStem therapy for ischemic stroke has a beneficial effect in patients who meet specific criteria, as indicated by the exploratory analyses in this study., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02961504.

Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) for cerebral aneurysm remains uncertain. This randomized trial of short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted treatment of CErebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE) aimed to clarify whether long-term DAPT can reduce the occurrence of ischemic stroke in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated by SACE compared with short-term DAPT., Methods: Patients treated for cerebral aneurysm with SACE were enrolled from 17 hospitals in Japan. Patients were enrolled within 30 days after SACE and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive long-term (12 months) or short-term (3 months) DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. Randomization was performed centrally through a web-based system. The primary outcome was the time to ischemic stroke event during 3 to 12 months after SACE. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs051180141)., Results: A total of 142 patients were recruited from November 4, 2016 to January 7, 2019. Among them, 65 and 68 patients assigned to the long- and short-term DAPT groups, respectively, were included in the full analysis set. Ischemic stroke occurred in no patients in the long-term DAPT group and in one patient in the short-term DAPT group. The incidence rate did not differ between the groups (0.0 vs 2.1/100 person-years; log rank test, P=0.33)., Conclusions: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, there was not a statistically significant difference in the rate of ischemic strokes between long- and short-term DAPT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HY reports research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb; lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Biomedical Solutions, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Medico's Hirata. HO reports research grants from Terumo, Stryker, Medtronic, Medikit, and Kaneka; and consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Kaneka, and Asahi Intec. KS reports lecturer’s fees from Medtronic Japan, Kaneka Medix and Terumo. YuM reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sakyo, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka, and Medicos Hirata. KK reports lecturer’s fee from Kyowa Kirin and Daiichi Sankyo. YaM reports advisory role for GE Health Care, Fuji Systems, Medicos Hirata, and Stryker; patents and royalties from Sumitomo Bakelite; lecturer’s fee from GE Healthcare, Stryker, Medtronic, Medico’s Hirata, Century Medical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Kaneka, and Fuji Systems. TS reports research grants from CANON Medical Systems. TD reports consultant fees from Ajinomoto, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Healios, Integral Geometry Science, Ono Pharmaceutical, Periotherapia, and Terumo; lecturer’s fee from Bayer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; participation fees on Data Safety Monitoring Boards or Advisory Boards from Astellas Pharma, Eisai, and Terumo Corporation, outside of the submitted work. NS reports a research grant from Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic and Terumo; lecturer’s fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, and Terumo; membership on the advisory boards for Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic and Terumo outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy is recognized as a pivotal treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Prolonged door-to-puncture time correlates with decreased patient independence after acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether a streamlined workflow, including nurse recognition of conjugate gaze deviation, could reduce door-to-puncture time in endovascular thrombectomy., Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy between March 2017 and March 2022 and compared a previous workflow with a streamlined workflow implemented in April 2019. In the streamlined workflow, nurses recognized conjugate gaze deviation to identify patients with large vessel occlusions and played a more active role in reducing the door-to-puncture time. We compared time metrics and outcomes, including recanalization status, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2, and favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at three months between the previous and streamlined workflow groups., Results: After the application of the streamlined workflow, the door-to-puncture time was reduced from 76 min to 68 min (p = 0.014), and the number of patients with a door-to-puncture time of less than 60 min increased (15% vs. 36%, p = 0.002). Outcomes including modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥ 2b (73% vs. 71%, p = 1.000), parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 (7% vs. 2%, p = 0.281), and favorable outcome (33% vs. 34%, p = 1.000) were comparable between the two groups., Conclusion: Nurse recognition of conjugate gaze deviation contributed to an 8-minute reduction in the door-to-puncture time, demonstrating the potential benefits of an organized workflow in acute ischemic stroke., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The nationwide verification of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was rarely performed after the extension of the therapeutic time window of alteplase or after the expansion of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to examine the long-term change in accurate real-world outcomes of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using the Japan Stroke Databank, a representative Japan-wide stroke database., Methods: We extracted all patients with AIS who received IVT with alteplase between October 11, 2005, the approval date for alteplase use for AIS in Japan, and December 31, 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups using two critical dates in Japan as cutoffs: the official extension date of the therapeutic time window for IVT to within 4.5 h of symptom onset and the publication date of the revised guideline, where the evidence level of MT was heightened. We assessed the yearly trend of IVT implementation rates and the secular changes and three-group changes in clinical outcomes at discharge., Results: Of 124,382 patients with AIS, 9,569 (7.7%) received IVT (females, 41%; median age, 75 years). The IVT implementation rate has generally increased over time and plateaued in recent years. The proportion of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) increased yearly over 15 years. The results of the changes in the outcomes of the three groups were similar to those of the annual changes., Conclusions: We revealed that IVT implementation rates in patients with AIS increased, and the functional outcome in these patients improved over 15 years. Therefore, the Japanese IVT dissemination strategy is considered appropriate and effective.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for patients with acute wake-up or unclear-onset strokes in clinical practice., Methods: This multicenter observational study enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients with last-known-well time &gt;4.5 h who had mismatch between DWI and FLAIR and were treated with IV alteplase. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after thrombolysis, all-cause deaths, and all adverse events. The efficacy outcomes were favorable outcome defined as an mRS score of 0-1 or recovery to the same mRS score as the premorbid score, complete independence defined as an mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days, and change in NIHSS at 24 h from baseline., Results: Sixty-six patients (35 females; mean age, 74 ± 11 years; premorbid complete independence, 54 [82%]; median NIHSS on admission, 11) were enrolled at 15 hospitals. Two patients (3%) had sICH. Median NIHSS changed from 11 (IQR, 6.75-16.25) at baseline to 5 (3-12.25) at 24 h after alteplase initiation (change, -4.8 ± 8.1). At discharge, 31 patients (47%) had favorable outcome and 29 (44%) had complete independence. None died within 90 days. Twenty-three (35%) also underwent mechanical thrombectomy (no sICH, NIHSS change of -8.5 ± 7.3), of whom 11 (48%) were completely independent at discharge., Conclusions: In real-world clinical practice, IV alteplase for unclear-onset stroke patients with DWI-FLAIR mismatch provided safe and efficacious outcomes comparable to those in previous trials. Additional mechanical thrombectomy was performed safely in them., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for real-world patients after extended time frames is associated with concerns about its efficacy and safety. We conducted a prospective registry at 77 centers between November 2019 and October 2020. The registry criteria included patients treated with Trevo Retriever alone or in combined therapy with an aspiration catheter. The primary outcome was effective reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade ≥ 2b), the secondary outcome was a modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 90 days, and the safety outcomes were worsening of neurologic symptoms within 24 h postoperatively, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 24 h after EVT and mortality. We also exlpored the difference between patients whose last known well time (LKWT) to a puncture was less than 6 h (0-6 h) and those whose LKWT was 6 h or more but less than 24 h (6-24 h). Among the 1041 patients registered, 1025 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 76.9 years, and 53.6% of the participants were males. The 6-24 h group was 206/998 (20.6%), the median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission was 18, and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score was 8. Combined technique as the first pass was used on 817 (79.7%) patients. The primary outcome was 934 (91.1%). The secondary outcome was 433/1021 (42.4%). Symptomatic ICH, any ICH, and mortality were 10/1019 (1.0%), 311/1019 (30.5%), and 75 (7.3%). In the subanalysis, the 6-24 h group was lower in NIHSS (median;18 vs 16), and the secondary outcome was not significantly different in the <6 h group. Even after treatment time expansion, this result was comparable to other Trevo-based trials and nationwide registries.

Background: Reducing intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can improve patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) intervention. We sought to identify ICH risk factors after AIS thrombectomy., Methods: This is a retrospective review of the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) database. All patients who underwent AIS thrombectomy with available ICH data were included. Multivariable regression models were developed to identify predictors of ICH after thrombectomy. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified by symptom status and European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) grade., Results: The study cohort comprised 6860 patients. Any ICH and symptomatic ICH (sICH) occurred in 25% and 7% of patients, respectively. Hemorrhagic infarction 1 (HI1) occurred in 36%, HI2 in 24%, parenchymal hemorrhage 1 (PH1) in 22%, and PH2 in 17% of patients classified by ECASS grade. Intraprocedural complications independently predicted any ICH (OR 3.8083, P<0.0001), PH1 (OR 1.9053, P=0.0195), and PH2 (OR 2.7347, P=0.0004). Race also independently predicted any ICH (black: OR 0.5180, P=0.0017; Hispanic: OR 0.4615, P=0.0148), sICH (non-white: OR 0.4349, P=0.0107), PH1 (non-white: OR 3.1668, P<0.0001), and PH2 (non-white: OR 1.8689, P=0.0176), with white as the reference. Primary mechanical thrombectomy technique also independently predicted ICH. ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique) was a negative predictor of sICH (OR 0.2501, P<0.0001), with stent retriever as the reference., Conclusions: This study identified ICH risk factors after AIS thrombectomy using real-world data. There was a propensity towards a reduced sICH risk with direct aspiration. Procedural complications and ethnicity were predictors congruent between categories of any ICH, sICH, PH1, and PH2. Further investigation of technique and ethnicity effects on ICH and outcomes after AIS thrombectomy is warranted., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PK, JRM, MM and MRL are members of the editorial board of JNIS., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background The health economic benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in addition to best medical management for acute ischemic stroke with large ischemic core is uncertain. Purpose To assess the cost-effectiveness of EVT plus best medical management versus best medical management alone in treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion and a baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5. Materials and Methods This is a secondary analysis of the randomized RESCUE-Japan LIMIT (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial), with enrollment November 2018 to September 2021, in which the primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Participants with a baseline ASPECTS 3-5 (on the basis of noncontrast CT and diffusion-weighted imaging) were randomized 1:1 to receive EVT plus best medical management ( n = 100) or best medical management alone ( n = 102). The primary outcome of the current study was cost-effectiveness, determined according to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A decision model consisting of a short-term component (cycle length of 3 months) and a long-term Markov state transition component (cycle length of 1 year) was used to estimate expected lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from health care and societal perspectives in the United States. Upper and lower willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at $100 000 and $50 000 per QALY, respectively. A deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of participant age and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of parameter uncertainty were conducted. Results A total of 202 participants were included in the study (mean age, 76 years ± 10 [SD]; 112 male). EVT plus best medical management resulted in ICERs of $15 743 (health care perspective) and $19 492 (societal perspective). At the lower and upper WTP thresholds, EVT was cost-effective up to 85 and 90 years (health care perspective) and 84 and 89 years (societal perspective) of age, respectively. When analyzing participants with the largest infarcts (ASPECTS 3) separately, EVT was not cost-effective (ICER, $337 072 [health care perspective] and $383 628 [societal perspective]). Conclusion EVT was cost-effective for participants with an ASPECTS 4-5, but not for those with an ASPECTS 3. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT03702413 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Widjaja in this issue.

Introduction: The management of intracranial artery dissection (IAD) has not been established, partly because the long-term course of the disease is not well-known. We retrospectively investigated the long-term course of IAD without subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) as an initial clinical presentation., Methods: Of 147 consecutive spontaneous first-ever IAD patients hospitalized between March 2011 and July 2018, 44 with SAH were excluded, and the remaining 103 were investigated. We divided the patients into two groups: Recurrence group as those with recurrent intracranial dissection >1 month after the initial dissection, and Non-recurrence group as those without them. Clinical characteristics were compared between those two groups., Results: The mean follow-up period was 33 months from the initial event. Recurrent dissection occurred in 4 patients (3.9%) >7 months after the initial dissection, none of whom were on antithrombotic treatments at recurrence. Three had ischemic stroke and the other had local symptoms [range: 8 to 44 months]. Nine (8.7%) had an ischemic stroke within 1 month of the initial event. There was no recurrent dissection between 1 and 7 months after the initial event. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between Recurrence and Non-recurrence groups., Conclusions: Four out of the 103 (3.9%) IAD patients had recurrent IAD >7 months after the initial event. IAD patients should be followed up for more than a half year after the initial event, with consideration given to the recurrence of IAD. Further research is needed on recurrence prevention measures to IAD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) known before ischemic stroke (KAF) has been postulated to be an independent category with a recurrence risk higher than that of AF detected after stroke (AFDAS). However, it is unknown whether this risk difference is confounded by pre-existing anticoagulation, which is most common in KAF and also indicates a high ischemic stroke recurrence risk., Methods: Individual patient data analysis from 5 prospective cohorts of anticoagulated patients following AF-associated ischemic stroke. We compared the primary (ischemic stroke recurrence) and secondary outcome (all-cause death) among patients with AFDAS versus KAF and among anticoagulation-naïve versus previously anticoagulated patients using multivariable Cox, Fine-Gray models, and goodness-of-fit statistics to investigate the relative independent prognostic importance of AF-category and pre-existing anticoagulation., Results: Of 4,357 patients, 1,889 (43%) had AFDAS and 2,468 (57%) had KAF, while 3,105 (71%) were anticoagulation-naïve before stroke and 1,252 (29%) were previously anticoagulated. During 6,071 patient-years of follow-up, we observed 244 recurrent strokes and 661 deaths. Only pre-existing anticoagulation (but not KAF) was independently associated with a higher hazard for stroke recurrence in both Cox and Fine-Gray models. Models incorporating pre-existing anticoagulation showed better fit than those with AF category; adding AF-category did not result in better model fit. Neither pre-existing anticoagulation nor KAF were independently associated with death., Conclusion: Our findings challenge the notion that KAF and AFDAS are clinically relevant and distinct prognostic entities. Instead of attributing an independently high stroke recurrence risk to KAF, future research should focus on the causes of stroke despite anticoagulation to develop improved preventive treatments. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:43-54., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Objectives: Cerebral microbleeds are associated with the risks of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, causing clinical dilemmas for antithrombotic treatment decisions. We aimed to evaluate the risks of intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke associated with microbleeds in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and combination therapy (i.e. concurrent oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet)., Methods: We included patients with documented atrial fibrillation from the pooled individual patient data analysis by the Microbleeds International Collaborative Network. Risks of subsequent intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke were compared between patients with and without microbleeds, stratified by antithrombotic use., Results: A total of 7,839 patients were included. The presence of microbleeds was associated with an increased relative risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.74, 95% confidence interval = 1.76-4.26) and ischemic stroke (aHR = 1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-1.59). For the entire cohort, the absolute incidence of ischemic stroke was higher than intracranial hemorrhage regardless of microbleed burden. However, for the subgroup of patients taking combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, the absolute risk of intracranial hemorrhage exceeded that of ischemic stroke in those with 2 to 4 microbleeds (25 vs 12 per 1,000 patient-years) and ≥ 11 microbleeds (94 vs 48 per 1,000 patient-years)., Interpretation: Patients with atrial fibrillation and high burden of microbleeds receiving combination therapy have a tendency of higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage than ischemic stroke, with potential for net harm. Further studies are needed to help optimize stroke preventive strategies in this high-risk group. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:61-74., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Aim: Stent-retriever (SR) thrombectomy has demonstrated superior outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared with medical management alone, but differences among SRs remain unexplored. We conducted a Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis to compare outcomes between three SRs: EmboTrap ® , Solitaire™, and Trevo ® . Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review among English-language studies published after 2014 in PubMed/MEDLINE that reported SRs in ≥25 patients. Functional and safety outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS 0-2), mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and embolization to new territory (ENT). Recanalization outcomes included modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) and first-pass recanalization (FPR). We used a random effects Meta-Analysis to compare outcomes; subgroup and outlier-influencer analysis were performed to explore heterogeneity. Results: Fifty-one articles comprising 9,804 patients were included. EmboTrap had statistically significantly higher rates of mRS 0-2 (57.4%) compared with Trevo (50.0%, p = 0.013) and Solitaire (45.3%, p < 0.001). Compared with Solitaire (20.4%), EmboTrap (11.2%, p < 0.001) and Trevo (14.5%, p = 0.018) had statistically significantly lower mortality. Compared with Solitaire (7.7%), EmboTrap (3.9%, p = 0.028) and Trevo (4.6%, p = 0.049) had statistically significantly lower rates of sICH. There were no significant differences in ENT rates across all three devices (6.0% for EmboTrap, 5.3% for Trevo, and 7.7% for Solitaire, p = 0.518). EmboTrap had numerically higher rates of recanalization; however, no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: The results of our Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis suggest that EmboTrap may be associated with significantly improved functional outcomes compared with Solitaire and Trevo. EmboTrap and Trevo may be associated with significantly lower rates of sICH and mortality compared with Solitaire. No significant differences in recanalization and ENT rates were found. These conclusions are tempered by limitations of the analysis including variations in thrombectomy techniques in the field, highlighting the need for multi-arm RCT studies comparing different SR devices to confirm our findings.

Background: We aimed to assess the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes in a post hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study) and how this association is modified by baseline imaging features., Methods: Inverse probability of treatment weight was used to remove baseline imbalances between those with and without AF. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), early neurological deterioration or death within 24 h, and death at 90 days. The logistic regression model was used to determine the associations., Results: Of the 3285 patients included in this analysis, 636 (19%) had AF at baseline. Compared with non-AF, AF was not significantly associated with an unfavourable shift of mRS (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.24), but with sICH (2.82; 1.78-4.48; IST-3 criteria), early neurological deterioration or death within 24 h (1.31; 1.01-1.70), and death (1.42; 1.12-1.79). Among patients with acute ischaemic signs (presence, extent, swelling and attenuation of acute lesions), AF was associated with the increased risk of all the poor outcomes (all P < 0.04 for interaction)., Conclusions: We found AF increased risk of sICH, early neurological deterioration or death and death, but not unfavourable functional recovery at day 90 after thrombolysis in patients with AIS. The presence of acute ischaemic brain imaging signs at stroke presentation could be used to improve risk stratification in the presence of AF., Trial Registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01422616)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: We examined outcome of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with administration of antithrombotics within 24 h after intravenous low-dose alteplase., Methods: Consecutive AIS patients who were treated with intravenous alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg from 2005 to 2021 were retrospectively included in our single-center registry. Patients were classified into two groups: those who received antithrombotics within 24 h after intravenous alteplase (early initiation group) and those who did not (control group). Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) within 36 h after onset, and death within 3 months. sICH was defined as any ICH with a ≥ 4-point increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or death within 36 h., Results: Of 1111 patients (women, 426; median age, 76 [interquartile range, 69-83] years; median NIHSS score, 11 [6-19]; cardioembolism, 580 [52.2%]), early initiation group comprised 58 patients (22; 72 [65-80] years; 7 [4-12]; 11 [19.0%]) and control group comprised 1053 patients (404; 77 [69-84] years; 11 [6-19]; 569 [54.1%]). No significant between-group differences were observed in the incidence of any ICH (17.2% vs. 21.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-2.44), sICH (0% vs. 0.9%, P = 1.00), or death within 3 months (5.2% vs. 6.7%; aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.36-4.23)., Conclusions: Early initiation of antithrombotics after intravenous alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg did not increase the rate of sICH or death within 3 months and may be used with caution in patients with advanced neurological deterioration., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been found to reduce functional disability in patients with acute stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. However, the extent of the ischemic region, measured using Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scores, may limit the efficacy of EVT., Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of EVT according to ASPECTS 3 or less vs 4 to 5., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial (RESCUE-Japan LIMIT) was an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2018 to December 2021 at 45 stroke centers across Japan. The trial enrolled adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large ischemic region, defined as ASPECTS 3 to 5 primarily determined by magnetic resonance imaging, with occlusion site at the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery segment 1. Among 203 enrolled patients, 1 withdrew consent and 202 were included in the original trial and secondary analysis. This secondary analysis was conducted in April 2022., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to EVT with medical therapy or medical therapy alone., Main Outcomes and Measures: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and symptomatic and any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours., Results: Among 202 patients, 106 (52%) had ASPECTS 3 or less (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [9.6] years; 54 female individuals [50.9%]) and 96 had ASPECTS 4 to 5 (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [10.6] years; 36 female individuals [37.5%]). Of patients with ASPECTS 3 or less, 12 (21.4%) in the EVT group and 9 (18.0%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.47-3.26). Of patients with ASPECTS 4 to 5, 19 patients (43.2%) in the EVT group and 4 (7.7%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 90 days (OR, 9.12; 95% CI, 2.80-29.70; interaction P = .01). The ordinal shift across the range of mRS scores toward a better outcome was not significant in those with ASPECTS or 3 or less (common OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.79-3.10) but was significant in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (common OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.07-9.71; interaction P = .046). The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly increased in patients with ASPECTS 3 or less when EVT was conducted (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.84-9.32) and nonsignificantly increased in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.89-4.73; interaction P = .24)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, EVT was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusive stroke and ASPECTS was 4 to 5 but not in those with ASPECTS 3 or less., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03702413.

The efficacy and safety of periprocedural anticoagulant therapy are still controversial. We investigated the effects of periprocedural anticoagulation on patients who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The patients were dichotomized into two groups according to the use of intravenous anticoagulant during or within 24 h after EVT (AC or non-AC group). Primary outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were defined as any or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH). Among 1278 enrolled patients, 740 patients (57.9%) were in the AC group and the remaining 538 patients (42.1%) were in the non-AC group. The median dose of heparin was 5000 units intraoperatively, and 10,000 units /day postoperatively. In the AC group, hypercholesterolemia, higher pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale score, non-cardiac embolism etiology, higher rate of anticoagulant premedication, non-administration of t-PA (tissue plasminogen activator), later admission, and longer procedure time were observed. The rate of primary outcomes was not significantly different between the AC and non-AC groups (40.1% vs. 43.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.96-1.73; p = 0.09). The incidence of any (26.2% vs. 25.7%; p = 0.80; adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.22) and symptomatic (4.3% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.52; adjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.46-1.51) intracranial hemorrhage within 72 h were not significantly different between the groups. Periprocedural anticoagulant therapy after acute revascularization did not relate to prognosis and intracranial hemorrhage after EVT., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: There is substantial controversy with regards to the adequacy and use of noncontrast head computed tomography (NCCT) for late-window acute ischemic stroke in selecting candidates for mechanical thrombectomy., Objective: To assess clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting in the late window who underwent mechanical thrombectomy stratified by NCCT admission in comparison with selection by CT perfusion (CTP) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, prospectively maintained Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) database was used by selecting patients within the late window of acute ischemic stroke and emergent large vessel occlusion from 2013 to 2021. Patients were selected by NCCT, CTP, and DWI. Admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) as well as confounding variables were adjusted. Follow-up duration was 90 days. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to March 2022., Exposures: Selection by NCCT, CTP, or DWI., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at 90 days., Results: Among 3356 patients, 733 underwent late-window mechanical thrombectomy. The median (IQR) age was 69 (58-80) years, 392 (53.5%) were female, and 449 (65.1%) were White. A total of 419 were selected with NCCT, 280 with CTP, and 34 with DWI. Mean (IQR) admission ASPECTS were comparable among groups (NCCT, 8 [7-9]; CTP, 8 [7-9]; DWI 8, [7-9]; P = .37). There was no difference in the 90-day rate of functional independence (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.59-1.71; P = .99) after adjusting for confounders. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (NCCT, 34 [8.6%]; CTP, 37 [13.5%]; DWI, 3 [9.1%]; P = .12) and mortality (NCCT, 78 [27.4%]; CTP, 38 [21.1%]; DWI, 7 [29.2%]; P = .29) were similar among groups., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, comparable outcomes were observed in patients in the late window irrespective of neuroimaging selection criteria. Admission NCCT scan may triage emergent large vessel occlusion in the late window.

Background: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse stroke outcomes, data regarding the influence of CKD on intravenous thrombolysis outcomes are scarce. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with unknown onset time in patients with CKD., Methods: Patients with an acute stroke of unknown onset time from the EOS trials (Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis) collaboration were evaluated using an individual patient-level database of randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous thrombolysis with placebo/standard treatment. CKD was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 Mixed-effect logistic-regression analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality., Results: Baseline data on renal function were available for 688 of 843 patients. Of these, CKD was present in 146 (21%), including 69 of 351 patients receiving alteplase and 77 of 337 patients receiving placebo/standard treatment. Overall, treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome, and CKD did not modify the treatment effect ( P interaction =0.834). A favorable outcome was observed in 31 of 69 (46%) patients with CKD in the alteplase group and in 28 of 77 (36%) patients with CKD in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.55-2.58]). Among patients with CKD, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (3%) in the alteplase group but in none of the controls ( P =0.133). At 90 days, death was reported in 3 patients (4%) in the alteplase group compared with 2 patients (3%) in the controls ( P =0.539)., Conclusions: The present analysis indicates that the benefit of alteplase does not differ between stroke patients with unknown onset time with and without CKD, although the statistical power was lacking to confirm the efficacy in subgroups. This study only applies to mild-to-moderate or predialysis CKD.

Background We elucidated the safety of treatment with alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg within 24 hours for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before ischemic stroke onset. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg from 2011 to 2021 were enrolled from our single-center prospective stroke registry. We compared outcomes between patients taking DOACs and those not taking oral anticoagulants within 48 hours of stroke onset. The primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage with a ≥4-point increase on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score from baseline. The efficacy outcome was defined as 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 after stroke onset. Of 915 patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis (358 women; median age, 76 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10), 40 patients took DOACs (6 took dabigatran, 8 took rivaroxaban, 16 took apixaban, and 10 took edoxaban) within 24 hours of onset and 753 patients did not take any oral anticoagulants. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable between patients on DOACs and those not on oral anticoagulants (2.5% versus 2.4%, P =0.95). The rate of favorable outcomes was comparable between the 2 groups (59.4% versus 58.2%, P =0.46), although the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in patients on DOACs. No significant differences showed in any intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours or mortality at 3 months. Conclusions Intravenous thrombolysis would be safely performed for patients on DOACs following the recommendations of the Japanese guidelines. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

Purpose: Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) are a rare complication after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation, while the incidence of asymptomatic ICHs detected by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, characteristics, and predictors of new-onset ICHs on MR imaging after AF ablation., Methods: We retrospectively studied 1257 consecutive AF ablation procedures in 1201 patients who underwent MR imaging on the day after the procedure. Repeat MR imaging within 3 months post-ablation was available in 352 procedures., Results: Old ICHs on the initial MR imaging were observed in 28 procedures (2.2%). Post-ablation new ICHs were observed in 14 procedures (4.0%), including one symptomatic (0.3%) and 13 (3.7%) asymptomatic ICHs. One patient had a new ICH on the initial MR imaging, while the remaining 13 had such on the repeat MR imaging. A univariate analysis revealed that a previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score were positive predictors of new ICHs (odds ratios, 5.502 and 1.435; P = 0.004 and 0.044). The lesion diameter did not significantly differ between the old and new ICHs (median, 6.1 mm vs. 8.0 mm, P = 0.281), while the predominant location differed (lobar areas, 22.6% vs. 53.3%; cerebellum, 22.6% vs. 20.0%; others, 54.8% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.026)., Conclusions: A few asymptomatic ICHs may occur after AF ablation. Most of the post-ablation new ICHs occurred a few days or later after the procedure. A previous ischemic stroke/TIA and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score may be risk factors for post-ablation ICHs., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The impact of prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) on clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) on clinical outcomes is uncertain. We explored the associations between prior APT and in-hospital and 90-day outcomes in a real-world setting., Methods and Results: The RESCUE-Japan Registry 2 is a physician-initiated registry of 2408 consecutive patients with acute LVO admitted to hospital within 24 h of stroke onset. We compared 1281 patients who received EVT with and without APT before stroke onset (APT group and No-APT group) in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 72 h after the onset, successful recanalization after EVT, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 90 days were also evaluated. Among the 254 patients (19.8%) in the APT group, 68 (27%) patients presented any ICH and 265 (26%) patients in the No-APT group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.53). The incidence of symptomatic ICH and successful recanalization were also similar between the APT and No-APT groups. The adjusted ORs of the APT group for mRS of 0-2 and death were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.62-1.41) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.3-1.19), respectively. In patients with an onset to door time ≥ 180 min, any ICH tended to be more prevalent in the APT group than in their counterparts (P for interaction = 0.008)., Conclusions: The risk of ICH after EVT was not different between patients with and without APT before EVT for acute LVO., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We explored the influence of low-dose intravenous alteplase and intensive blood pressure lowering on outcomes of acute ischemic stroke according to status/location of vascular obstruction in participants of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)., Methods: ENCHANTED was a multicenter, quasi-factorial, randomized trial to determine efficacy and safety of low- versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase and intensive- versus guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in acute ischemic stroke patients. In those who had baseline computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging angiography, the degree of vascular occlusion was grouped according to being no (NVO), medium (MVO), or large (LVO). Logistic regression models were used to determine 90-day outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] shift [primary], other mRS cut-scores, intracranial hemorrhage, early neurologic deterioration, and recanalization) by vascular obstruction status/site. Heterogeneity in associations for outcomes across subgroups was estimated by adding an interaction term to the models., Results: There were 940 participants: 607 in alteplase arm only, 243 in blood pressure arm only, and 90 assigned to both arms. Compared to the NVO group, functional outcome was worse in LVO (mRS shift, adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.13 [1.56-2.90]) but comparable in MVO (1.34 [0.96-1.88]) groups. There were no differences in associations of alteplase dose or blood pressure lowering and outcomes across NVO/MVO/LVO groups (mRS shift: low versus standard alteplase dose 0.84 [0.54-1.30]/0.48 [0.25-0.91]/0.99 [0.75-2.09], P interaction  = 0.28; intensive versus standard blood pressure lowering 1.32 [0.74-2.38]/0.78 [0.31-1.94]/1.24 [0.64-2.41], P interaction  = 0.41), except for a borderline significant difference for intensive blood pressure lowering and increased early neurologic deterioration (0.63 [0.14-2.72]/0.17 [0.02-1.47]/2.69 [0.90-8.04], P interaction  = 0.05)., Conclusions: Functional outcome by dose of alteplase or intensity of blood pressure lowering is not modified by vascular obstruction status/site according to analyses from ENCHANTED, although these results are compromised by low statistical power. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01422616.

Background: The present observational study aimed to clarify the association between bridging therapy with heparin before starting rivaroxaban and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Methods and Results: Patients with NVAF who experienced acute ischemic stroke or TIA of the middle cerebral artery territory and started rivaroxaban within 30 days after onset were enrolled and were followed up for 90 days. Outcome measures were ischemic events, major bleeding, their composite, and death or disability 90 days after onset. Ischemic events were defined as ischemic stroke, TIA, and systemic embolism. Of 1,308 analyzed patients, 638 received bridging therapy with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin with a median of 10,000 IU/day. Associations between bridging therapy and ischemic events or major bleeding were not statistically significant individually, but the association between bridging therapy and their composite was statistically significant (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.29). The association between bridging therapy and death or disability 90 days after onset was not statistically significant., Conclusions: The composite of ischemic events and major bleeding was more frequent in patients with NVAF who received bridging therapy with low-dose heparin than in those who started treatment directly with rivaroxaban after ischemic stroke or TIA.

Background: The "1-3-6-12-day rule" for starting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack recommends timings that may be later than used in clinical practice. We investigated more practical optimal timing of DOAC initiation according to stroke severity., Methods: The combined data of prospective registries in Japan, Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement-nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (September 2011 to March 2014) and RELAXED (February 2014 to April 2016) were used. Patients were divided into transient ischemic attack and 3 stroke subgroups by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score: mild (0-7), moderate (8-15), and severe (≥16). The early treatment group was defined as patients starting DOACs earlier than the median initiation day in each subgroup. Outcomes included a composite of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, and severe bleeding within 90 days. Six European prospective registries were used for validation., Results: In the 1797 derivation cohort patients, DOACs were started at median 2 days after transient ischemic attack and 3, 4, and 5 days after mild, moderate, and severe strokes, respectively. Stroke or systemic embolism was less common in Early Group (n=785)-initiating DOACS within 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, respectively-than Late Group (n=1012) (1.9% versus 3.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27-0.89]), as was ischemic stroke (1.7% versus 3.2%, 0.54 [0.27-0.999]). Major bleeding was similarly common in the 2 groups (0.8% versus 1.0%). On validation, both ischemic stroke (2.4% versus 2.2%) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.2% versus 0.6%) were similarly common in Early (n=547) and Late (n=1483) Groups defined using derivation data., Conclusions: In Japanese and European populations, early DOAC initiation within 1, 2, 3, or 4 days according to stroke severity seemed to be feasible to decrease the risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism and no increase in major bleeding. These findings support ongoing randomized trials to better establish the optimal timing of DOAC initiation.

Background and Objectives: Chronic kidney disease is a worldwide public health problem that is recognized as an established risk factor for stroke. It remains unclear whether its distribution and clinical impact are consistent across ischemic stroke subtypes in patients with renal impairment. We examined whether renal impairment was associated with the proportion of each stroke subtype vs ischemic stroke overall and with functional outcomes after each stroke subtype., Methods: Study participants were 10,392 adult patients with an acute stroke from the register of the Japan Stroke Data Bank, a hospital-based multicenter stroke registration database, between October 2016 and December 2019, whose baseline serum creatinine levels or a dipstick proteinuria result were available. All ischemic strokes were classified according to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria. Unfavorable functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 3-6 at discharge. Mixed effect logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between the outcomes and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), eGFR strata (<45, 45-59, ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), or dipstick proteinuria ≥1 adjusted for covariates., Results: Overall, 2,419 (23%) patients had eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and 1,976 (19%) had eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , including 185 patients (1.8%) receiving hemodialysis. Both eGFR 45-59 and eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 were associated with a higher proportion of cardioembolic stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.39] and 1.55 [1.34-1.79], respectively) and a lower proportion of small vessel occlusion (0.79 [0.69-0.90] and 0.68 [0.59-0.79], respectively). A similar association with the proportion of these 2 subtypes was proven in the analyses using decreased eGFR as continuous values. Both eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and proteinuria were associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with cardioembolic stroke (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.01-1.69] and 3.18 [2.03-4.98], respectively) and small vessel occlusion (OR, 1.44 [1.01-2.07] and 2.08 [1.08-3.98], respectively)., Discussion: Renal impairment contributes to the different distributions and clinical effects across specific stroke subtypes, particularly evident in cardioembolic stroke and small vessel occlusion. This possibly indicates shared mechanisms of susceptibility and potentially enhancing pathways., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is generally avoided when the infarction is large, but the effect of endovascular therapy with medical care as compared with medical care alone for large strokes has not been well studied., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial in Japan involving patients with occlusion of large cerebral vessels and sizable strokes on imaging, as indicated by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score (ASPECTS) value of 3 to 5 (on a scale from 0 to 10, with lower values indicating larger infarction). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive endovascular therapy with medical care or medical care alone within 6 hours after they were last known to be well or within 24 hours if there was no early change on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Alteplase (0.6 mg per kilogram of body weight) was used when appropriate in both groups. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 3 (on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included a shift across the range of modified Rankin scale scores toward a better outcome at 90 days and an improvement of at least 8 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (range, 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater deficit) at 48 hours., Results: A total of 203 patients underwent randomization; 101 patients were assigned to the endovascular-therapy group and 102 to the medical-care group. Approximately 27% of patients in each group received alteplase. The percentage of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 3 at 90 days was 31.0% in the endovascular-therapy group and 12.7% in the medical-care group (relative risk, 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 4.37; P = 0.002). The ordinal shift across the range of modified Rankin scale scores generally favored endovascular therapy. An improvement of at least 8 points on the NIHSS score at 48 hours was observed in 31.0% of the patients in the endovascular-therapy group and 8.8% of those in the medical-care group (relative risk, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.76 to 7.00), and any intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 58.0% and 31.4%, respectively (P<0.001)., Conclusions: In a trial conducted in Japan, patients with large cerebral infarctions had better functional outcomes with endovascular therapy than with medical care alone but had more intracranial hemorrhages. (Funded by Mihara Cerebrovascular Disorder Research Promotion Fund and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy; RESCUE-Japan LIMIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03702413.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: The optimal timing of initiating oral anticoagulants after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke is unknown. Factors related to early initiation of rivaroxaban and differences in clinical outcomes of stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who underwent reperfusion therapy was investigated., Methods: From data of 1,333 NVAF patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in a prospective multicenter study, patients who started rivaroxaban after intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy were included. The clinical outcomes included the composite of ischemic events (recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding at 3 months., Results: Among the 424 patients, the median time from index stroke to starting rivaroxaban was 3.2 days. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, infarct size (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95%CI, 0.99-1.00) was inversely and successful reperfusion (OR, 2.13; 95%CI, 1.24-3.72) was positively associated with initiation of rivaroxaban within 72 hours. 205 patients were assigned to the early group (< 72 hours) and 219 patients (≥ 72 hours) to the late group. Multivariable Cox regression models showed comparable hazard ratios between the two groups at 3 months for ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95%CI, 0.03-1.32) and major bleeding (HR, 1.80; 95%CI, 0.24-13.54)., Conclusions: Infarct size and results of reperfusion therapy were associated with the timing of starting rivaroxaban. There were no significant differences in the rates of ischemic events and major bleeding between patients after reperfusion therapy who started rivaroxaban < 72 hours and ≥ 72 hours after the index stroke., Clinical Trial Registration: Unique identifier: NCT02129920; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts. Dr. Koge reports no disclosures. Dr. Yamagami reports research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Terumo, JIMRO, and Striker; lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Terumo, Medtronic, Medico’s Hirata, Johnson and Johnson, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; and membership of the advisory boards for Daiichi-Sankyo and Biomedical Solutions. Dr. Toyoda reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Yasaka reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and CSL Behring. Dr. Hirano reports lecturer’s fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Medtronic. Dr. Hamasaki reports no disclosures. Dr. Nagao reports lecturer’s fee from Bayer Yakuhin. Dr. Yoshimura reports lecture fees from Boehringer, Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Phizer, BMS, Takeda, Sanofi, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Medtronic, Stryker, and Medico’s Hirata and research support from BMS and Takeda. Dr. Fujishige reports no disclosures. Dr. Tempaku reports no disclosures. Dr. Uchiyama reports honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneka, and Takeda. Dr. Mori reports lecture fees from Johnson & Johnson, Otsuka, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Sosei, Kyowahakko-Kirin, Toshiba, Medtronic, and Nihon Medi-Physics and research support from Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Fuji Film RI, General Electric, MHWL, MEXT, and JSPS. Dr. Koga reports honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Otsuka, Daiichi-Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and Takeda, scientific advisory board from Ono, and research supports from Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, Pfizer and Shionogi, outside the submitted work. Dr. Minematsu reports honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Behringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Japan Stryker, Dai-ichi Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Nippon Chemiphar, Fuji Film RI Pharma, MSD, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Sanofi, advisory board from CSL Behring, Bayer Yakuhin, EPS, Corporation, HEALIOS K.K., T-PEC Corporation and BMS. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Objective: The optimal timing to start direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We aimed to compare early (≤5 days of AIS) versus late (>5 days of AIS) DOAC-start., Methods: This is an individual patient data pooled analysis of eight prospective European and Japanese cohort studies. We included patients with AIS related to non-valvular AF where a DOAC was started within 30 days. Primary endpoints were 30-day rates of recurrent AIS and ICH., Results: A total of 2550 patients were included. DOACs were started early in 1362 (53%) patients, late in 1188 (47%). During 212 patient-years, 37 patients had a recurrent AIS (1.5%), 16 (43%) before a DOAC was started; 6 patients (0.2%) had an ICH, all after DOAC-start. In the early DOAC-start group, 23 patients (1.7%) suffered from a recurrent AIS, while 2 patients (0.1%) had an ICH. In the late DOAC-start group, 14 patients (1.2%) suffered from a recurrent AIS; 4 patients (0.3%) suffered from ICH. In the propensity score-adjusted comparison of late versus early DOAC-start groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard of recurrent AIS (aHR=1.2, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9, p=0.69), ICH (aHR=6.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 56.3, p=0.12) or any stroke., Conclusions: Our results do not corroborate concerns that an early DOAC-start might excessively increase the risk of ICH. The sevenfold higher risk of recurrent AIS than ICH suggests that an early DOAC-start might be reasonable, supporting enrolment into randomised trials comparing an early versus late DOAC-start., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The following companies manufacture drugs involved in this study: Bayer (BY, rivaroxaban), Boehringer Ingelheim (BI, dabigatran), Pfizer/Bristol Meyer Squibb (PB, apixaban) and Daiichi Sankyo (DS, edoxaban). GMDM: scientific advisory boards and travel honoraria: BY; speaker honoraria: PB. DJS: scientific advisory boards: BY and PB. GT: scientific advisory boards: BY, DS and BI. MK: speaker honoraria from DS, BY and PB. KT: speaker honoraria from DS, BY, BI and PB. KM: speaker honoraria from BY, travel grant from PB. PL: scientific advisory boards: BY, DS and BI; funding for travel or speaker honoraria: BY and BI; research funding: BI. LHB: consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from BY and PB. MP: honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of BI, BY and PB. SE: funding for travel or speaker honoraria: BY, BI, PB and DS; scientific advisory boards: BY, BI and PB; educational grant from PB; research grant from DS. DJW: speaking honoraria: BY., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: DS-1040 is a novel inhibitor of the activated form of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor that may have therapeutic potential in thromboembolic diseases, such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or pulmonary embolism. We undertook a Phase I clinical trial to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DS-1040 in Japanese patients who were eligible for thrombectomy following AIS., Methods: The trial enrolled patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion, who were planned for thrombectomy within 8 h of symptom onset. Subjects were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of placebo or DS-1040 (0.6, 1.2, 2.4 or 4.8 mg) in a sequential-cohort design. The primary endpoints were the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding within 36 and 96 h, respectively, of treatment initiation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were also assessed., Results: Nine patients received placebo and 32 patients received DS-1040. There were no cases of symptomatic ICH or major extracranial bleeding with either placebo or DS-1040 after 36 and 96 h. One patient, who received DS-1040 0.6 mg, experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage that was considered to be drug-related. Three patients died (2 placebo, 1 DS-1040), but no deaths were adjudicated as study drug-related. In vivo exposure to DS-1040 increased in proportion to dosage, but no clear dose-response relationship was seen for D-dimer levels and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity., Conclusions: Single doses of DS-1040 0.6-4.8 mg were well tolerated in Japanese patients with AIS undergoing thrombectomy., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03198715; JapicCTI-163164., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: A previous report revealed single pass recanalization was associated with better functional outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in real-world settings. However, the effect of single pass recanalization in acute large vessel occlusion based on the largest registry in real-world settings in Asian population are not well scrutinized., Materials and Methods: RESCUE-Japan Registry-2 was a physician-initiated prospective multicenter registry that enrolled consecutive patients with acute large vessel occlusion who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patients who underwent endovascular therapy and achieved good recanalization in single or multiple device passes (single-pass group and multiple-passes group, respectively) in terms of the good outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days after onset. We estimated the odds ratios, safety and mortality adjusting for confounders., Results: Among 2420 patients registered, 1281 patients treated with endovascular therapy. 829 patients were analyzed (557 patients in single-pass and 272 patients in multiple-passes group). Patient characteristics were almost similar between two groups. The good outcome was more observed of patients in the single groups (51.5% vs 39.3%). The adjusted odds ratio of single pass of good outcome was 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.69). The frequencies of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the two groups., Conclusion: Single pass recanalization was associated with good clinical outcome on real-world settings in Asian population., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We report a case of an ischemic stroke after a successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and continuous oral anticoagulation therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which was the trigger for diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). A 68-year-old woman underwent catheter ablation of persistent AF and continued oral anticoagulation with edoxaban at a dose of 30 mg once daily after the ablation procedure. An asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was detected by brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging one month post-ablation. Oral anticoagulation with dabigatran at 110 mg twice daily was continued thereafter due to a high stroke risk profile of a CHA 2 D 2 -VASc score of 3. Eight months after the procedure, the patient had multiple acute cerebral infarctions despite no apparent recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias and continuation of the DOAC. A blood examination revealed the presence of anti-cardiolipin-beta2-glycoproteion complex antibodies and lupus anticoagulants, and the patient was diagnosed with primary APS. The DOAC was changed to warfarin. The patient has remained free from any ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral events for 11 months after the oral anticoagulants were changed. The ischemic stroke in the present case appeared to be associated with APS rather than AF. A diagnosis of APS may be extremely crucial in AF patients who have new-onset ischemic strokes under continuous administration of DOACs, because vitamin K antagonists are more effective for the prevention of APS-related ischemic strokes than DOACs.

Importance: Whether recent changes in demographic characteristics and therapeutic technologies have altered stroke outcomes remains unknown., Objective: To determine secular changes in initial neurological severity and short-term functional outcomes of patients with acute stroke by sex using a large population., Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, hospital-based, multicenter, prospective registry cohort study used the Japan Stroke Data Bank and included patients who developed acute stroke from January 2000 through December 2019. Patients with stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who registered within 7 days after symptom onset were studied. Modified Rankin Scale scores were assessed at hospital discharge for all patients., Exposure: Time., Main Outcomes and Measures: Initial severity was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage and by the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grading for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Outcomes were judged as favorable if the modified Rankin Scale score was 0 to 2 and unfavorable if 5 to 6., Results: Of 183 080 patients, 135 266 (53 800 women [39.8%]; median [IQR] age, 74 [66-82] years) developed ischemic stroke, 36 014 (15 365 women [42.7%]; median [IQR] age, 70 [59-79] years) developed intracerebral hemorrhage, and 11 800 (7924 women [67.2%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [53-75] years) developed subarachnoid hemorrhage. In all 3 stroke types, median ages at onset increased, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scores decreased throughout the 20-year period on multivariable analysis. In ischemic stroke, the proportion of favorable outcomes showed an increase over time after age adjustment (odds ratio [OR], 1.020; 95% CI, 1.015-1.024 for women vs OR, 1.015; 95% CI, 1.011-1.018 for men) but then stagnated, or even decreased in men, on multivariate adjustment including reperfusion therapy (OR, 0.997; 95% CI, 0.991-1.003 for women vs OR, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.985-0.994 for men). Unfavorable outcomes and in-hospital deaths decreased in both sexes. In intracerebral hemorrhage, favorable outcomes decreased in both sexes, and unfavorable outcomes and deaths decreased only in women. In subarachnoid hemorrhage, the proportion of favorable outcomes was unchanged, and that of unfavorable outcomes and deaths decreased in both sexes., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, functional outcomes improved in patients with ischemic stroke during the past 20 years in both sexes presumably partly owing to the development of acute reperfusion therapy. The outcomes of patients with hemorrhagic stroke did not clearly improve in the same period.

Background To clarify differences in clinical significance of intracardiac thrombi in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-associated stroke as identified by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods and Results Using patient data on nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-associated ischemic stroke between 2011 and 2014 from 15 South Korean stroke centers (n=4841) and 18 Japanese centers (n=1192), implementation rates of TEE/TTE, and detection rates of intracardiac thrombi at each center were correlated. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke at 1 year after the onset. A total of 5648 patients (median age, 75 years; 2650 women) were analyzed. Intracardiac thrombi were detected in 75 patients (1.3%) overall. Thrombi were detected in 7.8% of patients with TEE (either TEE alone or TEE+TTE: n=679) and in 0.6% of those with TTE alone (n=3572). Thrombus detection rates varied between 0% and 14.3% among centers. As TEE implementation rates at each center increased from 0% to 56.7%, thrombus detection rates increased linearly (detection rate [%]=0.11×TEE rate [%]+1.09 [linear regression], P <0.01). TTE implementation rates (32.3%-100%) were not associated with thrombus detection rates ( P =0.53). Intracardiac thrombi were associated with risk of recurrent ischemic stroke overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.35, 95% CI, 1.07-5.16). Thrombus-associated ischemic stroke risk was high in patients with TEE (aHR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.17-8.35), but not in those with TTE alone (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.12-6.51). Conclusions Our data suggest clinical relevance of TEE for accurate detection and risk stratification of intracardiac thrombi in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-associated stroke. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01581502.

Background: There is currently no validated risk prediction model for recurrent events among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Considering that the application of conventional risk scores has contextual limitations, new strategies are needed to develop such a model. Here, we set out to develop and validate a comprehensive risk prediction model for stroke recurrence in AIS patients with AF., Methods: AIS patients with AF were collected from multicenter registries in South Korea and Japan. A developmental dataset was constructed with 5648 registered cases from both countries for the period 2011‒2014. An external validation dataset was also created, consisting of Korean AIS subjects with AF registered between 2015 and 2018. Event outcomes were collected during 1 year after the index stroke. A multivariable prediction model was developed using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model with non-stroke mortality as a competing risk. The model incorporated 21 clinical variables and was further validated, calibrated, and revised using the external validation dataset., Results: The developmental dataset consisted of 4483 Korean and 1165 Japanese patients (mean age, 74.3 ± 10.2 years; male 53%); 338 patients (6%) had recurrent stroke and 903 (16%) died. The clinical profiles of the external validation set (n = 3668) were comparable to those of the developmental dataset. The c-statistics of the final model was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.66 ‒0.71). The developed prediction model did not show better discriminative ability for predicting stroke recurrence than the conventional risk prediction tools (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and ATRIA)., Conclusions: Neither conventional risk stratification tools nor our newly developed comprehensive prediction model using available clinical factors seemed to be suitable for identifying patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke among AIS patients with AF in this modern direct oral anticoagulant era. Detailed individual information, including imaging, may be warranted to build a more robust and precise risk prediction model for stroke survivors with AF., Competing Interests: This study was supported by Bristol‒Myers Squibb Korea and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (no. 2020ER620200#) and a Grant-in-Aid (H23-Junkanki-Ippan-010) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The funding sources did not participate in any part of the study, from conception to article preparation.

Objectives: Endovascular therapy (EVT) is safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the influence of the AIS subtype (large-artery atherosclerosis [LAA] or cardioembolism [CE]) on clinical outcome in patients treated with EVT remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical results between the two subtypes using data from a multicenter prospective registry (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2)., Materials and Methods: Among 2420 patients in RESCUE-Japan Registry, 682 patients who were diagnosed with LAA or CE were enrolled. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-1, 0-3, and 6. The relationship between time from onset and clinical outcome was also analyzed., Results: Among the 682 patients, 124 were classified into the LAA group and 558 into the CE group. The baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was significantly lower (median 15 vs. 18, p < 0.001). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 was observed in 54 of 124 patients (44%) in the LAA group and 232 of 558 patients (42%) in the CE group (p = 0.69). The proportion of patients with mRS 0-2 tended to decrease according to onset-to-puncture time in the CE group but not in the LAA group (p trend =0.0007)., Conclusions: The rate of good outcome was similar between LVO due to LAA and CE. However, the rate of favorable outcome did not decrease according to onset-to-puncture time in the LAA group., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Shirakawa has no conflict of interest. Dr. Matsukawa has no conflict of interest. Dr. Sakai received research grants from Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi-Sankyo, NeuroVasc, and Terumo, and lecturer fees from Biomedical Solutions, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Stryker. Dr. Yamagami received a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb; lecturer fees from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Stryker; and membership in the advisory boards of Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Imamura received lecturer fees from Medtronic and Stryker. Dr. Matsumoto received lecturer fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Sumitomo Bakelite, Kaneka Medix, and Fuji Systems. Dr. Tanaka received lecturer fees from Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Takeuchi received lecturer fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Stryker. Dr. Uchida received lecturer fees from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Morimoto received lecturer fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kyocera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, and Toray; received manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; and served in the advisory boards of Asahi Kasei, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Boston Scientific. Dr Yoshimura received research grants from Medtronic, Medicos Hirata, Terumo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Otsuka, and lecturer fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Otsuka, Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Stryker, Medtronic, and Mitsubishi Tanabe., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Outcomes after stroke as a result of large-vessel occlusion in patients with prestroke disability were compared between endovascular therapy (EVT) and medical management. Methods and Results Of 2420 patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in Japan, patients with prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores 2 to 4 with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, or M1 of the middle cerebral artery were analyzed. The primary effectiveness outcome was the favorable outcome, defined as return to at least the prestroke modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 339 patients (237 women; median 85 [interquartile range (IQR), 79-89] years of age; median prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 3 [IQR, 2-4]) were analyzed. EVT was performed in 175 patients (51.6%; mechanical thrombectomy, n=139). The EVT group was younger ( p <0.01) and had lower prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores ( p <0.01) than the medical management group. The favorable outcome was seen in 28.0% of the EVT group and in 10.9% of the medical management group ( p <0.01). EVT was associated with the favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.55-5.85; mixed effects multivariable model with inverse probability of treatment weighting). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were similar between the EVT (4.0%) and medical management (4.3%) groups ( p =1.00). Conclusions Patients who underwent EVT showed better functional outcomes than those with medical management. Given proper patient selection, withholding EVT solely on the basis of prestroke disability might not offer the best chance of favorable outcome. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

Objectives: Cardioembolic stroke has a poor prognosis. We evaluated the region-dependent efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) based on diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS)., Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the RELAXED study, which investigated the optimal timing of rivaroxaban to prevent nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) recurrence in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), included NVAF patients admitted with AIS or transient ischemic attack in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), with internal carotid artery (ICA), M1, or M2-MCA occlusion. Relationships between DWI-ASPECTS region and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), mortality, recurrence, and hemorrhagic stroke were compared between patients with and without EVT, and adjusted odds ratios for age, pre-stroke mRS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), ICA occlusion, infarct size, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) use, and onset-to-hospitalization time were estimated., Results: EVT patients had significantly lower hemoglobin levels, higher median NIHSS scores, more lentiform nucleus infarcts, ICA or M1-MCA occlusions, treatment with rt-PA, and fewer M3, M5, or M6 infarcts and M2-MCA occlusions than no-EVT patients. EVT patients had shorter onset-to-hospitalization times and more frequent favorable functional outcomes (p=0.007). Mortality, recurrent ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic infarction were similar in both groups. EVT was associated with significantly better functional outcomes among patients with insular ribbon (p=0.043) and M3 (p=0.0008) infarcts. M3 patients had significantly fewer rt-PA and EVT, and longer onset-to-hospitalization times., Conclusions: An occlusion in the insular ribbon or M3 region was associated with favorable functional outcomes in patients treated with EVT after cardioembolic stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest K.U. received lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo. M.Y. received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, BMS, Takeda, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sanofi, Otsuka, CSL Behring, Eisai, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Sekisui Medical and research support from Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. K.T. received lecture fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi-Sankyo, and BMS. E.M. received lecture fees from Johnson & Johnson, Otsuka, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Sosei, Kyowahakko-Kirin, Toshiba, Medtronic, and Nihon Medi-Physics and research support from Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Fuji Film RI, General Electric, MHWL, MEXT, and JSPS. T. Hirano received lecture fees from Astellas, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Medtronic, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sanofi, Takeda, and Tanabe-Mitsubishi and research support from Astellas, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and JSPS KAKENHI (grant number 25461320, PI, 2014-2016; grant number 16K09731, PI, 2016-2017). H.Y. received lecture fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS, Takeda, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Medtronic, Stryker, Termo, Johnson and Johnson, and Medico's Hirata and research support from BMS. T.N. received lecture fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi, Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon, Eisai, FP, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Medtronic, Mochida, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Mitsubishi Tanabe. S.U. received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Takeda, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sanofi, Otsuka, Mitsubishi Tanabe, AstraZeneca, Shionogi, and Astellas Amgen and research support from the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation. K.M. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Cooperation, Japan Stryker, Kowa, Nihon Medi-Physics Co, BMS, Sawai Pharmaceutical Co., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co Ltd, Medico's Hirata, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Inc, Sanofi, MSD, Eisai Co., Nippon Chemiphar, and Towa Pharmaceutical Co. S.Y. received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, BMS, Takeda, Sanofi, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Medtronic, Stryker, and Medico's Hirata and research support from BMS and Takeda. Y.O., F.S., H.K., and T. Hamasaki have no disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To clarify the relationship between early neurological symptoms and long-term functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke, which would be beneficial for patient management and determining clinical study criteria of novel therapeutic interventions., Materials and Methods: We retrieved data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) and investigated the association between 24- and 72-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, stratified by the site of occlusion (carotid or vertebrobasilar circulatory large arterial occlusion [ACO or PCO, respectively]) and endovascular recanalization therapy (EVT) performance. We examined the correlation using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho). Predictive accuracies of 24- and 72-hour NIHSS scores for good outcomes at 90 days (defined as mRS score of 0-2) were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and the corresponding areas under the curves (AUCs)., Results: Among the 2420 patients, 1745 had ACO (971 with EVT, 774 without EVT) and 263 had PCO (127 with EVT, 136 without EVT). The 24- and 72-hour NIHSS scores were significantly associated with 90-day mRS scores and accurately predicted good outcomes (all rhos ≥0.76, all AUCs ≥0.86). In the ACO group, there were differences in rho and AUC depending on EVT performance and the time from onset to NIHSS acquisition, but no differences were observed in the PCO group., Conclusions: EVT performance and time frame should be considered when determining the criteria of novel therapeutic interventions, especially for patients with ACO., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Tatebayashi had no disclosures to report. Dr. Yoshimura reported research grants from Medtronic, Medicos Hirata, Termo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Otsuka; lecturer's fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Otsuka, Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Stryker, Medtronic, and Mitsubishi Tanabe. Dr. Sakai reported a research grants from Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi-Sankyo, NeuroVasc and Terumo; lecturer's fees from Biomedical Solutions, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra and Stryker. Dr. Uchida reported the lecturer's fee from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Kageyama had no disclosures to report. Dr. Yamagami reported research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb, the lecturer's fees from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic, Medicos Hirata, Termo, Johnson & Johnson and Stryker; and membership of the advisory boards for Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Morimoto reported lecturer's fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kyocera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, and Toray; the manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; served advisory boards for Asahi Kasei, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Boston Scientific., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In all of randomized controlled trials of mechanical thrombectomy, the target vessels were proximal. Herein we report a clinical trial of the Tron FX stent retriever, including the smallest size of 2/15 mm for distal intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO)., Objective: Eligible patients presented within 8 h of onset with proximal or distal LVOs, and the Tron FX 4/20 mm or 2/15 mm were used as the first-line device., Methods: The primary endpoints were rate of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) grade 2a-3 immediately after using Tron FX only, and mortality rate 90 d. We compared the outcomes between sizes 4/20 and 2/15 mm., Results: The clinical trial was conducted in 50 cases, of which 44% presented with distal LVO and 15 cases were treated using only Tron FX 2/15 mm. The overall rate of mTICI grade 2a-3 was 80.0% (75.8% with Tron FX 4/20 mm, and 86.7% with 2/15 mm), and a 90-day modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2 or improvement of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale after thrombectomy ≥ 10 was achieved in 66.7% of cases (61.3% with Tron FX 4/20 mm, and 80.0% with 2/15 mm). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 8.0%, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h occurred in 2.0% of cases., Conclusion: In this clinical trial using the Tron FX, which included the size of 2/15 mm for distal LVO, its efficacy was similar and its safety was superior compared with previous studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors who are members of the Japan Neurosurgical Society (JNS) have registered online self-reported conflicts of interest disclosure statement forms through the website for JNS members. H. Imamura received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from Medtronic Co. N. Sakai received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from JIMRO Co., Johnson & Johnson K.K., Medtronic Co,. Penumbra Co., and Stryker Japan K.K., and research funding from Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Terumo Co. H. Yamagami received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from Terumo Co., Biomedical Solutions Co., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., and research funding from JIMRO Co. Y. Matsumoto received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from Medtronic Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., GE Health care Japan Co., Stryker Co., Century Medical Co., Medico's Hirata Co., and Fuji systems Co. S. Yoshimura received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Bayer Co., and Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., and research funding from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. and Medtronic Co. Y. Matsumaru received Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria from Medtronic Co., Stryker Co., Terumo Co., Johnson & Johnson Co., Kaneka Co., JIMRO Co., and Biomedical Solutions Co. Other authors have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Admission hyperglycemia is an indicator of poor functional prognosis in acute stroke, but investigations of its prevalence and effects on the outcomes of acute large vessel occlusion in real-world, large-scale studies are limited, especially in Asian population., Objective: We aimed to elucidate the relationship between admission hyperglycemia and outcomes in a prospective multicenter registry in Japan., Methods: We analyzed data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism (RESCUE) Japan Registry 2, which was a prospective, multicenter registry that enrolled patients from 46 centers in Japan. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as blood glucose level >140 mg/dL. The relationships between clinical outcomes and admission hyperglycemia were analyzed in all 1,932 assessable patients. A favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at day 90, as well as mortality within 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) within 72 h, was analyzed. We performed subgroup analyses of the adjusted variables to investigate the association between hyperglycemia and favorable outcome in relation to each variable., Results: Admission hyperglycemia was present in 687 (35.6%) of the assessable patients and in 420 (26.9%) of the 1,561 patients without diabetes. A favorable outcome was significantly less frequent in the hyperglycemia group than in the no-hyperglycemia group (33.2% vs. 47.6%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.76). The mortality rates were 12.8% and 6.8% in the hyperglycemia and no-hyperglycemia groups, respectively. The incidence of SICH within 72 h was higher in the hyperglycemia group than in the no-hyperglycemia group (4.4% vs. 1.9%, adjusted OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.36-4.82). Hyperglycemia was associated with unfavorable outcomes in almost all subgroups., Conclusions: Admission hyperglycemia in Japanese patients with large vessel occlusion stroke is associated with an unfavorable functional outcome at 90 days, mortality within 90 days, and the occurrence of SICH within 72 h., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO)., Methods: The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics., Results: Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, p = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, p = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, p < 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, p = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, p = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, p = 0.42)., Discussion/conclusion: The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)