Search

Red blood cell allo-immunization is the immune response of an individual to foreign red blood cell antigens not present on the surface of their own cells. The aim of that paper is to clarify the different factors influencing the antibody response against red blood cell antigens., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

For ten years, the working party of immunohaematology of the French Society of Blood Transfusion organizes a quality control. After the modification of the law about the realization of erythrocyte typing and detection of unexpected red cell allo-antibodies, the quality control was performed in order to determine the sensitivity of the indirect antiglobulin test by filtration with a standard anti-RH1(D) produces by the National Reference Center of Blood Groups.

Fifty-seven IgG monoclonal anti-D antibodies were evaluated in the Rh flow cytometry section, in which 12 laboratories participated. Staining protocols and a fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated Fab fragment goat anti-human IgG (H + L) as a secondary antibody were recommended but not mandatory. A CcDEe red blood cell (RBC) sample that was shown to be homozygous for RHD by molecular methods was supplied and used as internal 'standard RBC' throughout all experiments. An RBC panel comprising two partial D and four weak D types was supplied as well. The use of standard RBC reduced the variability of the data among the laboratories and allowed the conversion of fluorescence data into epitope densities, which were compounded in an antigen density (antigen D per RBC). The highest antigen density was determined for DVI type III, followed by DVII and weak D type 3; the lowest antigen density were determined for weak D type 1 and type 2. Nine of the 12 participating laboratories discriminated three groups of aberrant RhD that had similar Rhesus indices (RI): D category VI with RI = 0; weak D type 2 and type 3 with an high RI; and D category VII and weak D type 1 with an intermediate RI. The antigen densities and the Rhesus indices obtained correlated well among the laboratories of this Workshop section despite different staining protocols, secondary antibodies and instrumentation.

Until the '80s blood group reagents were composed of human or animal polyclonal antibodies; nowadays they are mainly produced from monoclonal antibodies. In this paper two aspects will be considered; firstly the evolution in the use of monoclonal reagents in France and secondly the quality of these new reagents in comparison with polyclonal reagents. From 1981 to 1995, 17567 batches of blood group reagents were analyzed and controlled by the French Blood Group Reference Laboratory (CNRGS). All data are given in six tables.

Immunological transfusion reactions more than often lead to an activation of the complement proteins and mononuclear cells, inducing a haemolysis from which stem the observed clinical symptoms. In the case of incompatibility, the alloantibodies can lead to an immediate reaction, taking place in the first few minutes or, in the case of a delayed reaction, arising after 24 hours. A standardized clinical and biological evaluation is necessary in order to confirm the diagnosis and to assess the consequences of the antigen-antibody conflict.

The Société Française de Transfusion Sanguine and the Centre National de Référence pour les Groupes Sanguins performed a quality control to evaluate the performances of two serological tests: the Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT) and the Elution test. Among the 110 Blood Transfusion Centers participating in this control, 80 (73%) returned a result. Of these, 68 results were correct for the DAT (85%; positive for type IgG) and 31 results were correct for the elution (39%; anti-FY1). This control gave the opportunity to confirm the main procedures used in routine testing on a national scale. The analysis of the results underlines the importance of the choice of a standardized technique for these tests. Such controls are useful to appreciate the quality of the routine tests and to find the means to improve them.

The sensitivity of the low ionic strength solution antiglobulin test (LISS-AGT), polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test (PEG-AGT), low ionic strength solution solid-phase antiglobulin test (LISS-SPAT), gel low ionic strength solution antiglobulin test (GEL-LISS), and gel papain test (GEL-PAP) was compared in titration studies of 460 sera containing identified IgG alloantibodies. The GEL-PAP was 100% sensitive to detect Rh antibodies, whereas the PEG-AGT was the most sensitive to detect Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Ss, and rare blood group antibodies. The better performance of PEG-AGT was especially obvious with Kell, Duffy, and Ss antibodies (S = 100%). When the sensitivity of the LISS-AGT, PEG-AGT, GEL-LISS, and GEL-PAP was evaluated in different routines, the GEL-LISS showed to be more sensitive than PEG-AGT in the detection of clinically significant antibodies. These discrepant results showed that the performance of a technique may change when it is applied as a routine.

A patient suffering from chronic hepatitis exhibited severe transfusion reactions after administration of fresh frozen plasma and a plasma fraction: PPSB (prothrombin complex concentrate). 1 month before these reactions, she received fresh frozen plasma during plasma exchange therapy. The patient's serum obtained 1 week and 6 months after the second reaction gave a precipitation arc against PPSB preparations when examined by double-diffusion technique in agarose gel. An antibody of IgG class present in these sera reacted with a purified preparation of the fourth complement component (C4). This was demonstrated by various experiments (protein A radioimmunoassay and passive hemagglutination) using purified C4 as antigen. The antibody had a limited specificity and reacted only with C4 of Rodgers specificity. Phenotype determination of the patient's C4 group showed that she was Chido positive and Rodgers negative. Her HLA group was A1, Aw30; B8,-; DR3,-. The patient had neither detectable anti-IgA nor other anti-immunoglobulin antibodies. She had not received blood or plasma transfusion before her hepatitis. The coexistence of a precipitating anti-C4 antibody and adverse transfusion reactions to plasma fractions containing large amounts of C4 indicates that in the absence of antibodies of other specificities, this antibody can be considered as the cause of the transfusion reaction.