Search

In post-Soviet Kazakhstan, the system of care for children with autism has been transforming over the past three decades. There is little known about the use of complementary and alternative medicine by families raising autistic children in the post-Soviet region. An exploratory qualitative focus group design was employed to study parents' experiences of using complementary and alternative medicine focusing on the perceived factors driving the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by families of autistic children and the availability of complementary and alternative medicine. Six focus groups were conducted in five cities of diverse geographical locations in Kazakhstan. Data were analyzed using a framework analysis. Two overarching themes and subthemes are developed. The first "unmet needs" relates to predisposing factors that motivate parents to complementary and alternative medicine uptake and the second "chasing hope" relates to enabling factors that facilitate parents' uptake of complementary and alternative medicines. In summary, parents of autism spectrum disorder children in Kazakhstan face multiple challenges when seeking treatment for their children's condition and implement whatever complementary and alternative medicine interventions available. A decision to use, and the choice of intervention, mainly comes from perceptions of having no other choice rather than from rational decisions based on efficacy of complementary and alternative medicines. This study provides the first empirical conceptualization of parents' motives for choosing complementary and alternative medicine in Kazakhstan.

Background: Dyspareunia (pain during sex) is a common condition that causes physical and emotional stress for many women. This condition can be caused by various factors, including physical, hormonal, inflammatory, viral, neoplastic, psychological, and traumatic events. Anatomical causes include pelvic floor muscular weakness, uterine retroversion, hymenal remnants, and pelvic organ prolapse. The etiology of this condition is complex, causing it to be often overlooked. Objectives: The main aim of this study was to conduct a qualitative exploratory study and provide a comprehensive description of the knowledge and attitudes held by gynecologists in Kazakhstan on the medical validity, diagnosis, and treatment of dyspareunia. Design: This is an exploratory-descriptive qualitative study. Methods: Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with 10 physicians. They were identified as obstetrics and gynecology specialists, gynecologic oncologists, and outpatient gynecologists. The average number of years spent practicing their specialty is 15.7, with the shortest being 4 years and the longest being 35 years. All the participants are female. Braun and Clarke's six-stage, step-by-step methodology was used for the thematic analysis. Results: Findings suggest that gynecologists in Kazakhstan have knowledge of the most common causes of dyspareunia, although they still often attribute women's distress to psychological rather than physical factors. It was found that due to stigma and mutual embarrassment open dialogue about sexual health was lacking between patients and physicians. In addition, gynecologists describe difficulties discussing symptoms and performing intimate examinations due to time constraints and a lack of privacy at state facilities. Conclusion: To knowledgeably diagnose and treat patients with dyspareunia, gynecologists recommend further training to acquire the requisite evidence-based knowledge and competencies. Plain Language Summary: An Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative Study of Kazakhstani Gynecologists ' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Dyspareunia Background: Dyspareunia (pain during sex) is a common condition that causes physical and emotional distress in many women. Biological and psychological factors contribute to the onset of this condition, making diagnosis and management difficult for physicians. This painful condition can have a significant impact on women's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being, as well as their close relationships. Why was the study conducted? A thorough understanding of dyspareunia's causes, risk factors, and treatment techniques is required for effective management of the condition, but little research has been conducted in Kazakhstan on gynecologists' understanding of and attitudes toward dyspareunia. What did the researchers do? A qualitative study used online semi-structured interviews with gynecologists in Kazakhstan. What did the researchers find? The findings show that participating gynecologists are aware of the most common causes of dyspareunia, although they frequently attribute the condition to psychological rather than physical causes. It was found that due to stigma and mutual embarrassment, patients and participants did not engage in open discourse about sexual health. Furthermore, gynecologists have difficulty initiating discussions about women's sexual health and performing intimate examinations due to consultation time restrictions and a lack of privacy at state facilities. What do the researchers conclude? Additional training is recommended to gain the necessary evidence-based knowledge and competencies to accurately diagnose and treat patients with dyspareunia, and to address the lack of treatment protocols for dyspareunia in Kazakhstan, clinical guidelines published worldwide, including those issued by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, may be considered for use in Kazakhstan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about the experiences of frontline professionals in Kazakhstan. Although studies of frontline workers have been conducted worldwide, it is imperative that caution should be exercised when extrapolating findings from disparate societies and generalizing them to Central Asian countries. As such, the purpose of this study was to explore and describe the firsthand experiences, perceptions, and knowledge gained from the experience of Kazakh frontline physicians and nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. An exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) study was conducted over the course of a year in COVID-19 hospitals in Kazakhstan, with physicians (n = 23) and nurses (n = 7). Each participant was interviewed three times between May 2021 and May 2022. Braun and Clarke's six-step method was used for the thematic analysis. Three overarching themes and subthemes were identified: (1) Longitudinal Journey ("Nobody knew, nobody understood, nobody was ready"; "It's just life"); (2) Facets of Professionalism ("In my lifetime this is something unique"; "Who else if not us"; "We survived the war and the enemy"); and (3) Facets of Resilience ("God's providence"; "A good word heals too"). In light of the lack of research that has previously been conducted in Kazakhstan, the results of this study offer important new insight into the experiences of medical professionals during the COVID-19 epidemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In post-Soviet Kazakhstan, the system of care for children with autism has been transforming over the past three decades. There is little known about the use of complementary and alternative medicine by families raising autistic children in the post-Soviet region. An exploratory qualitative focus group design was employed to study parents' experiences of using complementary and alternative medicine focusing on the perceived factors driving the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by families of autistic children and the availability of complementary and alternative medicine. Six focus groups were conducted in five cities of diverse geographical locations in Kazakhstan. Data were analyzed using a framework analysis. Two overarching themes and subthemes are developed. The first "unmet needs" relates to predisposing factors that motivate parents to complementary and alternative medicine uptake and the second "chasing hope" relates to enabling factors that facilitate parents' uptake of complementary and alternative medicines. In summary, parents of autism spectrum disorder children in Kazakhstan face multiple challenges when seeking treatment for their children's condition and implement whatever complementary and alternative medicine interventions available. A decision to use, and the choice of intervention, mainly comes from perceptions of having no other choice rather than from rational decisions based on efficacy of complementary and alternative medicines. This study provides the first empirical conceptualization of parents' motives for choosing complementary and alternative medicine in Kazakhstan. The article reports the findings of a qualitative research study on how and why parents of autistic children in Kazakhstan utilize complementary and alternative medicine. We found that parents turn to complementary and alternative medicine because of the lack of professional care options available to them and in pursuit for hope and opportunities for their children with ASD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]