Search

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a constant rate infusion of ketamine on cardiac index (CI) in sheep, as estimated using noninvasive cardiac output (NICO) monitoring by partial carbon dioxide rebreathing, when anesthetized with sevoflurane at the previously determined minimum alveolar concentration that blunts adrenergic responses (MACBAR)., Animals: 12 healthy Dorset-crossbred adult sheep., Procedures: Sheep were anesthetized 2 times in a balanced placebo-controlled crossover design. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane delivered via a tight-fitting face mask and maintained at MACBAR. Following induction, sheep received either ketamine (1.5 mg/kg IV, followed by a constant rate infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h) or an equivalent volume of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (placebo). After an 8-day washout period, each sheep received the alternate treatment. NICO measurements were performed in triplicate 20 minutes after treatment administration and were converted to CI. Blood samples were collected prior to the start of NICO measurements for analysis of ketamine plasma concentrations. The paired t test was used to compare CI values between groups and the ketamine plasma concentrations with those achieved during the previous study., Results: Mean ± SD CI of the ketamine and placebo treatments were 2.69 ± 0.65 and 2.57 ± 0.53 L/min/m2, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 treatments. Mean ketamine plasma concentration achieved prior to the NICO measurement was 1.37 ± 0.58 µg/mL, with no significant difference observed between the current and prior study., Clinical Relevance: Ketamine, at the dose administered, did not significantly increase the CI in sheep when determined by partial carbon dioxide rebreathing.

Minimizing sympathetic stimulation under anesthesia prevents activation of the neuroendocrine stress response. The minimum alveolar concentration blunting adrenergic responses in 50% of the population when exposed to a noxious stimulus is defined as MAC-BAR. The purpose of this study was to determine the MAC-BAR of sevoflurane (MAC-BAR sevo ) in sheep and the MAC-BAR sparing effects of ketamine. Thirteen healthy Dorset-cross adult ewes, 4 ± 1 year old and weighing 74 ± 9 kg, were enrolled in a randomized blinded crossover study design. Ewes were anesthetized twice for MAC-BAR sevo determination. After face mask induction with sevoflurane, sheep received intravenous ketamine at 1.5 mg/kg and a constant rate infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo). After 8 day washout, the other treatment was administered. A bracketing technique was used for MAC-BAR sevo determination and values were collected in duplicate. The mechanical stimulus (sponge forceps) was applied at the coronary band for 1 min and blood was collected for ketamine plasma concentrations. The MAC-BAR sevo values of each treatment were compared using a paired t-test. Mean MAC-BAR sevo of the ketamine and placebo were 2.73 ± 0.23% and 2.77 ± 0.31%, respectively and no significant difference was found (p = .638). Average ketamine plasma concentrations was 1.54 ± 0.18 μg/mL maintained through the study. Ketamine at 1.5 mg/kg, followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h, did not decrease the MAC-BAR sevo in sheep. Further studies to determine the effect of higher doses of ketamine on inhalational anesthetic agents and their potential adverse effects are warranted., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the quality of recovery in dogs undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery induced with either propofol or a combination of ketamine and diazepam., Materials and Methods: Sixty client-owned dogs undergoing single-limb elective orthopaedic procedures were enrolled. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive induction with propofol (4 mg/kg) (group P) or ketamine (5 mg/kg) with diazepam (0.25 mg/kg) (group KD) to which all scorers were blinded. The recovery monitoring period lasted for 1 hour following extubation. The recovery period was video-recorded for blinded scoring at a later time. Scoring for quality of recovery was carried out using three different systems (lower numbers=better quality): a simple descriptive scale (1 to 5), a visual analogue scale (0 to 10 cm) and a numeric rating scale (0 to 10). Videos were reviewed by three ACVAA board-certified anaesthesiologist raters., Results: Five dogs were deemed to be ineligible. The mean (±SD) duration of anaesthesia was 260.4 ±57.84 minutes in group KD and 261.1 ±51.83 minutes in group P. There was no difference between groups for time to extubation, head lift or sternal recumbency. The number of dogs having a recovery that was scored overall as bad (mean simple descriptive scale > 4, mean visual analogue scale or numeric rating scale > 5) was not different between groups. Dogs in group KD had significantly lower scores than group P dogs (simple descriptive scale P=0.01, numeric rating scale P=0.03, visual analogue scale P=0.03)., Clinical Significance: Induction with ketamine and diazepam resulted in a smoother recovery from anaesthesia than induction with propofol., (© 2019 British Small Animal Veterinary Association.)

Objective: To determine the minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs anesthetized with propofol alone or propofol in combination with a constant rate infusion (CRI) of ketamine., Animals: 6 male Beagles., Procedures: Dogs were anesthetized on 3 occasions, at weekly intervals, with propofol alone (loading dose, 6 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.45 mg/kg/min), propofol (loading dose, 5 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.35 mg/kg/min) and a low dose of ketamine (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; CRI, 0.025 mg/kg/min), or propofol (loading dose, 4 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.3 mg/kg/min) and a high dose of ketamine (loading dose, 3 mg/kg; CRI, 0.05 mg/kg/min). After 60 minutes, the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious electrical stimulus was determined in duplicate., Results: Least squares mean ± SEM propofol MIRs required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus were 0.76 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, 0.60 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, and 0.41 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min when dogs were anesthetized with propofol alone, propofol and low-dose ketamine, and propofol and high-dose ketamine, respectively. There were significant decreases in the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus when dogs were anesthetized with propofol and low-dose ketamine (27 ± 10%) or with propofol and high-dose ketamine (30 ± 10%)., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Ketamine, at the doses studied, significantly decreased the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs.