Search

Background: Most high-grade renal injuries with urinary extravasation (UE) may be managed conservatively without intervention. For such patients, the American Urological Association Urotrauma guidelines recommend repeat imaging within 48 to 72 hours of injury. We sought to examine whether routine, proactive follow-up renal imaging was associated with need for urologic intervention or risk of complications., Methods: Patients treated to an urban level 1 trauma center for a five-state region, between 2005 and 2017 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes from a prospectively collected institutional trauma registry. Individual patient charts and imaging were reviewed to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV renal injuries. Those with UE were included, and patients with penetrating trauma, immediate urologic surgery, or in-hospital mortality were excluded., Results: Of 342 patients with grade IV injuries, 108 (32%) met the inclusion criteria. Urologic intervention was performed in 23% (25 of 108 patients) including endoscopic procedure (24 of 108 patients) and nephrectomy (1 of 108 patients). Repeat imaging was performed within 48 to 72 hours after initial imaging in 65% (70 to 108 patients). Patients who underwent routine reimaging had a higher rate of undergoing subsequent urologic procedure (31.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.008). For patients with reimaging who underwent a procedure, 18% (4 of 22 patients) were symptomatic, while all nonroutinely reimaged patients who underwent a procedure were symptomatic (3 of 3 patients). Patients who received routine repeat imaging had a higher mean number of abdominal computed tomography scans during their admission (2.5 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001), while the complication rate was similar between groups., Conclusions: Patients with grade IV renal lacerations with UE from blunt trauma who received routine repeat imaging were more likely to undergo an operation in the absence of symptoms and received more radiation during their hospital stay. Forgoing repeat imaging was not associated with an increase in urological complications. These data suggest that, in the absence of signs/symptoms, repeat imaging may be avoidable., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/care management, level IV., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine how sheath and endoscope size affect intrarenal pelvic pressures and risk of postoperative infectious complications comparing "Mini" vs "Standard" percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)., Materials and Methods: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli were grown and 10 9 of them were instilled into the porcine renal pelvis through retrograde access for 1 hour. Percutaneous access utilized a 14/16F 20 cm ureteral access sheath for the Mini arm and a 30F sheath for the Standard arm. Nephroscopy was simulated utilizing either an 8/9.8F semirigid ureteroscope or 26F nephroscope for 1 hour while intrarenal pelvic pressure was continuously monitored. Blood and tissue cultures of kidney, liver, and spleen biopsies were plated and incubated and positive cultures were confirmed with polymerase chain reaction., Results: Intrapelvic pressures were higher in the Mini group, 18.76 ± 5.82 mm Hg vs 13.56 ± 5.82 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Time spent above 30 mm Hg was greater in the Mini arm, 117.0 seconds vs 66.1 seconds (p = 0.0452). All pigs had positive kidney tissue cultures whereas spleen cultures were positive in 100% and 60% of pigs in the Mini and Standard arms, respectively (p = 0.0253); 90% and 30% had positive liver tissue culture in the Mini and Standard arms, respectively (p = 0.0062). Blood cultures were positive in 30% of pigs in the Mini arm compared with none in the Standard arm (p = 0.0603)., Conclusion: Mini-PCNL was associated with higher intrarenal pressures and higher risk of end organ bacterial seeding in the setting of an infected collecting system. This suggests a higher potential for infectious complications in a clinical setting.

Purpose Patients with ureteral stones frequently present to the emergency department for an initial evaluation with pain and/or nausea. However, a subset of these patients subsequently return to the emergency department for additional visits. We sought to identify clinical predictors of emergency department revisits. Materials and Methods We reviewed emergency department visits at our institution with an ICD-9 diagnosis of urolithiasis and an associated computerized tomography scan between 2010 and 2013. Computerized tomography studies were independently reviewed to confirm stone size and location, and degree of hydronephrosis. The primary outcome was a second emergency department visit within 30 days of the initial visit for reasons related to the stone. Patient characteristics and stone parameters at presentation were recorded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were done to identify factors associated with emergency department revisits. Results We reviewed the records of 1,510 patients 18 years old or older who presented to the emergency department with a diagnosis of ureteral stones confirmed by computerized tomography. Of the patients 164 (11%) revisited the emergency department within 30 days. On multivariable analysis the presence of a proximal ureteral stone, age less than 30 years and the need for intravenous narcotics in the emergency department remained independently associated with an emergency department revisit. Conclusions Younger patients, those with proximal stones and those requiring intravenous narcotics for pain control are more likely to return to the emergency department. Consideration should be given for early followup or intervention for these patients to prevent costly emergency department returns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]