Search

Lymphocele is a complication of renal transplantation, representing a lymphatic collection around the grafted kidney. The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) has been associated with a significant increase in lymphocele formation. This complication has been related to the antiproliferative activity of SRL, which delays surgical wound repair and closure of injured lymphatic vessels. The aim of this study was to relate the incidence of lymphocele with immunosuppression among 158 renal transplant patients operated with routine closure of all the visible lymphatic vessels around the iliac vessels and at the renal hilum. The incidence of lymphocele was not significantly different among the various immunosuppressive regimens.

Abstract: End-stage renal disease is associated with disorders in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function. Immunosuppressive therapies may influence the restoration of normal levels of gonadal hormones after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the hormonal status of successful renal transplant recipients who were treated with different immunosuppressive agents. Methods: Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in 59 male renal transplant recipients with stable graft function with serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Patients were treated with three different immunosuppressive regimens: group I, calcineurin inhibitors (CI; n = 15), group II, sirolimus without calcineurin inhibitors (SRL; n = 15), group III, sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (SRL * CI; n = 29). Results: Testosterone was significantly lower in group II versus group I (3.12 ± 1.23 versus 4.39 ± 1.53 ng/mL; P < .0197). Group III had higher testosterone values than group II, but lower than group I. FSH and LH were also higher in the SRL group, but the differences were not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small number of patients. No relationship was found between testosterone blood levels and age, posttransplant follow-up, renal function, time on dialysis, body mass index, steroid use, or posttransplant diabetes. Conclusion: Sirolimus seems to impair the improvement of gonadal function after renal transplantation. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data before patients are advised of this potential side effect. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Everolimus (EVL) has shown a potential to reduce nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine (CsA) while providing similar protection against rejection. We analyzed the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) among 20 cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with the combination of EVL + CsA. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab induction given pretransplant and on day 4 posttransplant; EVL at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/day followed by concentration control to trough levels of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7; CsA at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg per day and then concentration controlled with C2 monitoring (C2 500–700 ng/mL); and steroids in a tapering regimen to reach 5 mg by day 30. The overall incidence of ARE was 25%. On postoperative day 7, patients with ARE showed significantly lower mean EVL trough concentrations compared with those not experiencing ARE (NO ARE: 2.2 ± 2.1 ng/mL vs 4.8 ± 2.4 ng/mL) (P = .05). The CsA C2 values were close to the lower end of the target range on day 3 (583 ± 334 ng/mL). All rejecting grafts were functioning at 3 months posttransplantations, but mean serum creatinine was higher in the ARE group (ARE 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.2 NO ARE; P = .04). In conclusion, whenever EVL is used in combination with CsA to protect kidney transplant patients against the risk of acute rejection, a threshold of 3 ng/mL must be reached in the first week posttransplantation. We suggest careful monitoring of EVL exposure and increased EVL starting doses. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]