Search

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)as it has shown a better quality of life and longer survival compared to dialysis. Patients with ESRD have associated vascular pathology in a significant percentage, with abundant calcifications at the level of the aorto-iliac axis.The survival of transplanted patients has also increased so an important number of patients have multiple transplants,patients with an indication for a third, fourth and even fifth transplant.In these cases, in which the iliac fossa is no longer practicable(atheromatosis, vascular abnormalities, occupied iliac fossae for previous kidney transplant…), orthotopic kidney transplantation offers a viable option with good results.

TRANSFORM (TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen) was a 24-month, prospective, open-label trial in 2037 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized (1:1) within 24 hours of transplantation to receive everolimus (EVR) with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR + rCNI) or mycophenolate with standard-exposure CNI. Consistent with previously reported 12-month findings, noninferiority of the EVR + rCNI regimen for the primary endpoint of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 was achieved at month 24 (47.9% vs 43.7%; difference = 4.2%; 95% confidence interval = -0.3, 8.7; P = .006). Mean eGFR was stable up to month 24 (52.6 vs 54.9 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) in both arms. The incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) was lower in the EVR + rCNI arm (12.3% vs 17.6%) among on-treatment patients. Although discontinuation rates due to adverse events were higher with EVR + rCNI (27.2% vs 15.0%), rates of cytomegalovirus (2.8% vs 13.5%) and BK virus (5.8% vs 10.3%) infections were lower. Cytomegalovirus infection rates were significantly lower with EVR + rCNI even in the D+/R- high-risk group (P < .0001). In conclusion, the EVR + rCNI regimen offers comparable efficacy and graft function with low tBPAR and dnDSA rates and significantly lower incidence of viral infections relative to standard-of-care up to 24 months. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01950819., (© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant before starting dialysis again (pre-reTR) with a group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant after restarting dialysis (reTR)., Methods: This retrospective cohort included all the kidney retransplantations (second transplantations) between 2000 and 2012 performed at our center and their follow-up until July 2014. We analysed graft and patient survival, rejection rates, and immunologic parameters of these patients., Results: We studied 18 patients who had pre-reTR and 83 who had reTR. In the pre-reTR group no patient had panel-reactive assay (PRA) >10% at any time. In the reTR group 26.5% had PRA >10% at the time of transplantation (P = .014) and 54.2% had a historical highest PRA >10% (P < .001). The rejection rate was 11.1% in the pre-reTR group and 27.7% in the reTR group during the first year post-retransplantation (P = .227). Patient survival rate was 100% in the pre-reTR group at 5 years of follow-up, whereas in the reTR group at 1 year it was 95.2% and 85.9% at 5 years after retransplantation. Allograft survival at 1 and 5 years was 88% and 89%, respectively, in the pre-reTR group. On the other hand, in the reTR group it was 89% after the first year and 65% at 5 years post-retransplantation., Conclusion: Pre-emptive renal retransplantation is a feasible option that should be assessed in patients with kidney graft failure and may help to minimize the morbidity associated with dialysis reinitiation., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) with low iso-agglutinin (IG) titers (IGT), standard pre-conditioning treatment might be excessive. To try to answer this question, we evaluated the pre-conditioning requirements of a group of ABOi KT with low ABO IGT in our center. Our main objective was to assess desensitization requirements for ABOi KT with low IGT (<16) at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2006 to 2014., Methods: A retrospective study of desensitization (rituximab and plasma exchange [PE]) requirements for ABOi KT with IGT <16 was conducted., Results: One and 5 years after KT, patient survival was 100%. Renal graft survival was 90% at 1 and 5 years after KT. Mean PE performed before KT was 1.7 (standard deviation [SD], 1.703); 50% of the patients did not receive PE after transplantation, 30% received 2 sessions of PE, and 20% received only 1. The average is 0.8 (SD, 0.91).Follow-up IG determinations remained with low titers (≤8/8). No rebounds of titers were observed during the first 4 to 6 months after transplantation., Conclusions: Recipients with IGT ≤8 required none or only 1 PE session to reach acceptable titers (titers ≤4) to perform ABOi KT safely. This information is useful to assess the possibility of a minimized desensitization protocol in ABOi KT donors with low titers of IG to reduce adverse effects, reduce cost, and simplify pre-transplant logistics., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients represents a major clinical challenge leading to long periods on the waiting list. When a living donor is available, the use of different strategies to desensitize recipients with preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies can allow a successful transplantation., Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study including all living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) with desensitization (DS) from 2008 to 2014 in our transplant unit. The rates of rejection and graft survival were evaluated. DS consisted of plasma exchange (PE), rituximab (RTX), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) induction with thymoglobulin and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil., Results: From 2008 to 2014, we performed 368 LDKT, with 31 receiving desensitization. Seven cases from a clinical trial were excluded. Demographic data and outcomes were recorded. All of the patients received RTX + PE + IVIG. DS was performed for positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match (4.2%), T-cell- and/or B-cell-positive flow cytometry cross-match (87.5%) and presence of donor-specific antibodies alone (8.3%). We identified 23 episodes of rejection in 12 patients (50%); 79% were antibody-mediated rejections (AMR). Graft failure was 12.5%, with a mean time to graft loss of 229 ± 203 days. Mean follow-up was 37 ± 27 months, and graft survival was 91% and 86% at 1 and 5 years, respectively., Conclusions: Desensitization in LDKT appears to offer an acceptable option for highly sensitized patients. In our series, 41% presented an AMR and 12.5% showed transplant glomerulopathy in protocol and/or indication biopsies. However, short-term outcomes and graft survival were satisfactory., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The lack of donors is favoring living kidney donor (LKD) transplantation worldwide, quite often beyond the classic age-matching rules. We analysed renal function (RF) at 1 and 5 years in all donor and recipients as well as death-censored graft and patient survival. LKD recipients were divided into 4 subgroups: young recipients-young donors (YR-YD; N = 355), elderly recipients-young donors (ER-YD; N = 13), young recipients-elderly donors (YR-ED; N = 67), and elderly recipients-elderly donors (ER-ED; N = 38). "Elderly" was defined as ≥60 years. RF was better in those who received a young allograft (YR-YD/ER-YD) at any time (P < .001). There was a trend toward higher proteinuria among the recipients of an old allograft (YR-ED/ER-ED) at any time (P = not significant [NS]). However, our population showed low levels of proteinuria and this was not a risk factor for graft failure. Logistic regression model showed that creatinine level at 1 year is a good predictor of graft losses. Graft survival was worse in the allografts from elderly donors (P < .001). Analysing the young recipients, renal survival was inferior in those who received an old kidney (YR-ED; P < .00005) as well as mortality rates at 14 years (P = .03). The RF of young (N = 295) and elderly donors (N = 98) was optimal with no progression to ESRD or deaths registered during follow-up. In conclusion, young recipients of elderly kidneys pay the price of a worse RF, allograft prognosis, and patient prognosis. The pair YR-ED is a doable option, but we recommend age matching when it is possible., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Identifying a short-term endpoint for use in clinical trials that accurately reflects the influence of specific immunosuppressive regimens on long-term kidney graft survival is challenging. The number, timing, type (T-cell-mediated or antibody mediated), and severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes in terms of histological changes and functional impact are highly influential for graft prognosis, and a crude measure of overall acute rejection incidence alone is unlikely to be a robust predictor of graft outcome. A series of studies has shown remarkably consistent results in terms of the cutoff point for one-yr renal function which predicts poor long-term graft survival, indicating that a threshold of 50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) is likely to be appropriate. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at one yr post-transplant discriminates effectively among immunosuppressive regimens with regard to graft survival, primarily calcineurin inhibitor reduction strategies. Several other factors that can affect graft survival, such as pathological changes in the graft, may be partly influenced by the immunosuppressive regimen, but the contribution of drug therapy is difficult to define. A combined approach in which both treated BPAR and renal function at one yr are used to assess novel immunosuppressive regimens appears to be promising as the emphasis shifts toward sustaining kidney allograft survival over the long term., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major public health problem in the Spanish health system. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice, offering better survival and cost-effectiveness than other alternatives. This study aimed to compare the cost of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) during the first year after transplantation with that of hemodialysis (HD)., Method: A prospective, descriptive study of cost and efficacy was performed in the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona from January to December 2011. We included 106 patients (57 undergoing HD and 49 receiving a LDKT). The costs of LDKT (donor and recipient) and HD were calculated based on our economic database program., Results: The mean age of recipients and donors was 46 ± 15 and 52 ± 10 years, respectively, and 67% of the recipients were men. In HD patients, the mean age was 67 ± 11 years and 62% were men. The total cost of LDKT was €29,897.91 (€8,128.44 for donors and €21,769.47 for recipients). The total cost of HD was €43,000.88 (€37,917 for HD and related procedures plus €5,082 for transport). LDKT represented a savings of €13,102.97 per patient/year and the payback period was less than 1 year. Quality-adjusted life years were higher in LDKT than in HD patients., Conclusion: LDKT is cost effective during the first year after transplantation and is associated with enhanced quality of life. From both the medical and economic points of view, pre-emptive LDKD should be encouraged in Spain to reduce the health budget for ESRD., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the recent years, more than 60% of available deceased donors are either older than 50 yr or have significant vascular comorbidities. This makes the acceptance and rejection criteria of renal allografts very rigorous, especially in cases of younger recipients, and at the same time encourages live donations. In our country, there is a lack of homogeneity in the percentages of use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) allografts between the different autonomous communities. Furthermore, the criteria vary greatly, and in some cases, great importance is given to the biopsy while in others very little. In this study, we present a unified and homogenous criteria agreed upon by consensus of a 10-member Panel representing major scientific societies related to renal transplantation in Spain. The criteria are to be used in accepting and/or rejecting kidneys from the so-called ECDs. The goal was to standardize the use of these organs, to optimize the results, and most importantly to provide for the maximum well being of our patients. Finally, we believe that after taking into account the Panel's thorough review of specific scientific literature, this document will be adaptable to other national renal transplant programmes., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Objectives: To analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of renal transplantation in patients with ESRD due to SLE from January 1986 to December 2013 in a single center., Results: Fifty renal transplantations were performed in 40 SLE patients (32 female (80%), mean age at transplantation 36±10.4 years). The most frequent lupus nephropathy was type IV (72.2%). Graft failure occurred in a total of 15 (30%) transplantations and the causes of graft failure were chronic allograft nephropathy (n=12), acute rejection (n=2), and chronic humoral rejection (1). The death-censored graft survival rates were 93.9% at 1 year, 81.5% at 5 years, and 67.6% at the end of study. The presence of deceased donor allograft (P=0.007) and positive anti-HCV antibodies (P=0.001) negatively influence the survival of the renal transplant. The patient survival rate was 91.4% at the end of the study. Recurrence of lupus nephritis in renal allograft was observed in one patient., Conclusion: Renal transplantation is a good alternative for renal replacement therapy in patients with SLE. In our cohort, the presence of anti-HCV antibodies and the type of donor source were related to the development of graft failure.

Antiretroviral therapy has been immensely successful in reducing the incidence of opportunistic infections and death after HIV infection. This has resulted in heightened interest in noninfectious comorbidities including kidney disease. Although HIV-associated nephropathy, the most ominous kidney disease related to the direct effects of HIV, may be prevented and treated with antiretrovirals, kidney disease remains an important issue in this population. In addition to the common risk factors for kidney disease of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, HIV-infected individuals have a high prevalence of other risk factors, including hepatitis C and exposure to antiretrovirals and other medications. Therefore, the differential diagnosis is vast. Early identification (through efficient screening) and prompt treatment of kidney disease in HIV-infected individuals are critical to lead to better outcomes. This review focuses on clinical and epidemiological issues, treatment strategies (including dialysis and kidney transplantation), and recent advances among kidney disease in the HIV population.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MRP2 genes and mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients of the Symphony Pharmacogenomic substudy., Methods: Sixty-six renal transplant recipients of eight Spanish centres were randomized into four branches of immunosuppressive regimen: low dose of cyclosporine, standard dose of cyclosporine, tacrolimus and sirolimus, all in addition to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Fifty-five patients were genotyped for SNPs in MRP2, C24T and C3972T. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done before MPA administration and up to 12 h post-dose at Day 7, 1 month and 3 months post-transplant. Relationships of area under the curve (AUC) of MPA and MPAG plasma sampling with the presence of MRP2 SNPs and with the immunosuppressive regimens were studied., Results: At steady-state conditions, MPA-reduced exposure was observed in C24T variant allele in MRP2 (CC: 68.73 ± 6.78; *T: 48.12 ± 4.90, P = 0.023); no significant differences linked to C3972T SNP were observed. Taking into account groups of treatment, lower MPA AUC in variant allele of C24T was only found under macrolides treatment with statistically significant differences at Month 3 (Tac and SRL, CC: 86.52 ± 10.98 versus *T: 41.99 ± 4.82, P = 0.001; CsA, CC: 52.31 ± 5.30 versus *T: 54.24 ± 8.30, P = 0.772); for C3972T, the same tendency was found but differences at steady state did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: Renal transplant recipients T carriers of C24T MRP2 with macrolides treatment were associated with reduced MPA AUC in steady-state conditions. Patients treated with cyclosporine lost the effect of this polymorphism.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the experience of a renal transplantation unit in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)., Methods: A prospective study was performed between 2005 and 2010 among 23 patients with ESRD., Results: In this study 83% of HIV-infected patients with ESRD were included on the waiting list for renal transplantation with 4 patients in a clinical evaluation phase. During the follow-up, 52% of waiting list patients (n = 11) received a renal transplant, and 1 patient underwent a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Among the waiting list group we observed a significant later exclusion (43%; n = 3). Among the transplanted group there was a high but clinically inconsequential prevalence of acute tubular necrosis (36%; n = 4) and acute rejection episodes (36%; n = 4). The renal function showed a serum creatinine of 1.1 mg/dL at a follow-up of 24 + 12 months. All patients on the waiting list and after the transplantation are prescribed combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) with a low viral load <50 with CD4 >200., Conclusions: HIV-infected patients with ESRD should be considered to be candidates for renal transplantation if they meet the HIV inclusion criteria. Renal transplantation in adequately selected HIV-infected patients is a safe procedure with acceptable patient and graft survivals., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The prognosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has improved in recent years with the introduction of antiretroviral treatment. While the frequency of AIDS-defining events has decreased as a cause of death, mortality from non-AIDS-related events including end-stage renal diseases has increased. The etiology of chronic kidney disease is multifactorial: immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, HIV-associated nephropathy, thrombotic microangiopathies, and so on. HIV infection is no longer a contraindication to transplantation and is becoming standard therapy in most developed countries. The HIV criteria used to select patients for renal transplantation are similar in Europe and North America. Current criteria state that prior opportunistic infections are not a strict exclusion criterion, but patients must have a CD4+ count above 200 cells/mm(3) and a HIV-1 RNA viral load suppressible with treatment. In recent years, more than 200 renal transplants have been performed in HIV-infected patients worldwide, and mid-term patient and graft survival rates have been similar to that of HIV-negative patients. The main issues in post-transplant period are pharmacokinetic interactions between antiretrovirals and immunosuppressants, a high rate of acute rejection, the management of hepatitis C virus coinfection, and the high cardiovascular risk after transplantation. More studies are needed to determine the most appropriate antiretroviral and immunosuppressive regimens and the long-term outcome of HIV infection and kidney graft., (© 2011 International Society of Nephrology)

Background: A renal transplant is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease due to its superior short- and long-term survival benefits compared with dialysis treatment. A common trend for kidney transplantation in developed countries is an increasing acceptance of older patients, patients with comorbidities, and patients with vascular problems (eg, atheromatosis, venous thrombosis). For those patients, an orthotopic kidney transplant (OKT) is an option., Objective: Our aim was to analyze the results of the largest OKT series in the world (surgical technique, complications, and outcomes) and to compare indications, surgical techniques, and long-term results from two different periods (before and after February 1987)., Design, Settings, and Participants: Between April 1978 and September 2009, 223 OKT were performed. We compared the results of transplants performed in two different periods: from April 1978 to January 1987 with 139 patients and from February 1987 to September 2009 with 84 patients., Intervention: OKT were performed in all cases as described in the first report published in 1989 by Gil-Vernet et al., Measurements: The clinical data, surgical reports, and complications rate of all patients were reviewed retrospectively. From a database maintained prospectively, two different periods were described, and the long-term results of the OKT were compared. Graft and patient survival in orthotopic versus heterotopic transplants from the same period were also compared., Results and Limitations: During the second period an important decrease in the number of OKT was observed due to the change in indication for this specific technique. No important differences between periods were noted in terms of surgical technique. The rate of urinary complications rate was similar in both periods. No differences in graft survival between series have been observed (p=0.22), but a higher mortality rate was seen in the second period mostly due to an older unfit population (p=0.031). No differences were observed in overall graft and patient survival between orthotopic and heterotopic kidney transplants performed during the same period., Conclusions: OKT is a good alternative with acceptable rates of urologic and vascular complications for those patients for whom heterotopic transplant is considered unsuitable., (Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Osteoarticular complications are common in patients with chronic renal failure and they often require implantation of a hip arthroplasty (total or partial) due to osteoarthritis, femoral neck fracture or ischemic necrosis of multifactor aetiology. Between 1992 and 2005 we operated on eighteen patients (23 hips) with chronic renal failure who were receiving renal replacement therapy (ten haemodialysis and eight renal transplants), and in each case either a total or partial hip arthroplasty was implanted. This group comprised nine women and nine men, with a mean age of 56 years (range: 30-83). Five cases were bilateral. The clinical diagnoses were necrosis (fourteen cases), femoral neck fracture (five cases) and osteoarthritis (three cases). The main early complications were haemorrhage in seventeen cases (74%) and infection in six cases (33%) (two urinary infections and four of the surgical wound). The late complications involved eight cases (35%) of prosthetic loosening (five aseptic and three septic). The surgery-related mortality rate was 17% (three cases). Prosthetic hip surgery in patients receiving renal replacement therapy is associated with high morbidity and mortality, thus highlighting the importance of careful patient selection.

Persistent hyperparathyroidism is the most frequent cause of hypercalcemia after renal transplantation, namely, hypercalcemia is observed in about 10% of patients at 1 year. This prospective study evaluated the effect of cinacalcet, a second-generation calcimimetic, on serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) blood levels among recipients with hypercalcemia due to persistent hyperparathyroidism. Thirteen renal transplanted patients (10 women and 3 men) were included based upon: a total serum calcium >10.5 mg/dL; intact PTH (iPTH) blood levels >65 pg/mL; graft function >6 months, and stable maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. After inclusion, patients initially received 30 mg of cinacalcet once daily. The mean time of initiation was 64 +/- 7 months after transplantation. The follow-up was 6 months. The median dose of cinacalcet was 30 mg/d (5 patients received 60 mg/d). During the study period, renal function remained stable. Serum calcium levels decreased significantly from 11.7 +/- 0.39 to 10.35 +/- 0.8 mg/dL (P < .001). Serum phosphate levels increased from 2.82 +/- 0.34 mg/dL to 3.2 +/- 0.41 mg/dL (P < .05). The mean iPTH levels significantly decreased from 308 +/- 120 to 210 +/- 80 pg/mL (P < .05). There were no significant change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 blood levels (from 17.7 +/- 9 to 17.4 +/- 6 ng/mL), but the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 blood levels decreased from 53.8 +/- 18.2 to 32.6 +/- 9.2 pg/mL (P < .01). There were no significant changes in blood levels of alkaline phosphatase, magnesium, bicarbonate, calciuria, phosphaturia, and immunosuppressive drugs. Cinacalcet was well tolerated in all patients except one who had gastrointestinal discomfort. In summary, cinacalcet corrected hypercalcemia and improved phosphatemia in patients with persistent hyperparathyroidism after transplantation with no negative effects on renal function.

HIV infection has experienced dramatic improvement in morbidity and mortality with the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). This prompted a reevaluation of organ-solid transplantation as a treatment option for HIV-infected patients. Some trials in the United States have shown that one- and 2-year graft and patient survival is comparable to HIV-negative transplant population. In Europe the experience is still scarce. The aim of this study is to analyse the outcome and the clinical characteristics of HIV-infected patients who received kidney transplantation in Spain in the HAART era. Ten patients were transplanted in our country since 2001. Only one patient was black. The main cause of end-stage renal disease reported was glomerulonephritis. Six of the recipients were coinfected by hepatitis C virus. Inclusion criteria included undetectable HIV viral load and CD4 counts greater than 200/pL. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, with antibody induction in 4 cases. The median and mean follow-up was 11 and 16.3+/-15.6 (3-46) months, respectively. One recipient lost his graft because of early renal venous thrombosis. The remaining patients are functioning graft with mean serum creatinina level of 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was diagnosed in 4 recipients and was reversed in all cases with antirejection treatment. The plasma HIV RNA levels have remained controlled and CD4 counts have been stable in excess of 200 cell/microL. None of patients have developed AIDS complications. Recipients receiving protease inhibitor-based HAART regimens required significant dosing modification to maintain appropriate tacrolimus levels. Our results show that renal transplantation can be a safe and effective treatment in select HIV-infected patients. Like other series, the acute rejection rate was higher than in non-HIV recipients. The reasons of this rejection incidence remain unknown.

The prevalence of human immunodeficience virus (HIV) infection among patients under renal replacement therapy varies, with estimates of 1% for Europe and 1.5% for the United States. Survival in HIV infected individuals receiving renal replacement therapy has improved since the introduction of high activity antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Current experience in renal transplantation in HIV-infected patients in the United States indicates that the three-year survival rate is similar to that of HIV-negative transplant recipients, with virological and immunological control of the infection by HAART and no increase in the number of opportunistic infections or tumors. The criteria for selecting renal transplantation candidates in this population are the following: no aids-defining events, CD4 cells > 200 cells/.l and undetectable viral load under HAART. In Spain, where most of these patients are former drug abusers, a two-year period of abstinence from cocaine and heroine abuse is also required, although patients can be participating in the methadone program. The main problems in the post-transplantation period have been interactions between HAART and immunosuppressive drugs, management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and the high rate of acute rejection. To date, seven such renal transplantations have been performed in Spain, with favorable patient and graft survival and no progression to aids.

Background/aims: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the main cause of late graft loss and nonimmunological factors, including hypertension and proteinuria, the principal etiological factors. In this context, blockage of the renin-angiotensin system could be helpful. The aim of the present study was to review the renoprotective efficacy of losartan in a large group of renal transplant patients undergoing long-term follow-up., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 276 renal transplant patients treated with losartan was performed. The indication for losartan was arterial hypertension in 163 patients, proteinuria in 37 patients and hypertension plus proteinuria in the remaining 76 patients. Clinical and biochemical parameters before starting losartan treatment (-6 months, -3 months and at baseline) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months after the introduction of losartan were analyzed., Results: Arterial hypertension significantly decreased after the introduction of losartan (p = 0.000). Serum creatinine was significantly decreased by losartan therapy, and changes in the serum creatinine slope (1/sCr) before and after losartan were statistically significant. Proteinuria markedly decreased after the introduction of losartan. Clinical and biochemical tolerance of losartan was excellent in most patients and only 9 out of the 276 patients (3%) treated with losartan discontinued the drug because of an adverse event. During follow-up, only 3 patients required substitutive treatment with dialysis due to progressive deterioration of renal function in the context of chronic allograft nephropathy., Conclusion: Losartan demonstrated high efficacy as a renoprotective agent in renal transplant patients and could be useful in the treatment and prevention of chronic allograft nephropathy., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)