Search

Introduction: Cough as a symptom of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was first described by Creevy in 1935, and despite one (unpublished) study suggesting it may affect 31% of these patients, as well as cough being discussed in forums for patients with kidney cancer, few clinicians are aware of this association. The cough has been described as unusual in nature, resolving rapidly after treatment with nephrectomy/embolisation but returning if the tumour recurs., Methods and Analysis: A prospective study using a questionnaire will identify the prevalence of cough in patients with suspected or confirmed RCC attending the Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer (London, UK). A longitudinal study in a representative sample of these patients, using EQ-5D-5L and Leicester Cough Questionnaires, together with the use of semi-structured interviews with patients, will identify the impact of cough in addition to having a diagnosis of suspected or confirmed RCC on quality of life. To investigate cough mechanisms, a pilot study using cough hypersensitivity testing will be performed on patients with RCC, with and without a cough. Clinical samples (urine, blood, phlegm and breath condensate) from patients with RCC, with and without a cough, will be collected and analysed for the presence of substances known to trigger or enhance cough and compared with the results obtained from healthy volunteers., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted (UK HR REC 22/PR/0791 dated 25/08/2022). Study outputs will be presented and published nationally and internationally at relevant conferences. This study will establish the prevalence of cough in patients with suspected or confirmed kidney cancer and support the education of clinicians to consider this diagnosis in patients with chronic cough (eg, recommending protocols to include both kidneys when investigating respiratory symptoms with chest CT scans). If substances known to trigger or enhance cough are identified and elevated in clinical samples, this research could offer potential targets for treatment for this distressing symptom., Trial Registration Number: NIHR CRN portfolio CPMS ID:53 372., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None except for the promotions and salaries that Kurinchi Gurusamy receive, are dependent on the publishing research protocols and findings., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Mutations in von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene (VHL) underlie the VHL hereditary cancer syndrome and also occur in most sporadic clear cell renal cell cancers (CCRCC). Currently, the mechanism(s) by which VHL loss of function promotes tumor development in the kidney are not fully elucidated. Here, we show that VHL inactivation in precancerous lesions in kidneys from patients with VHL disease correlates with marked down-regulation of the intercellular adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Moreover, in VHL-defective cell lines (RCC4 and RCC10) derived from sporadic CCRCC, reexpression of VHL was found to restore E-cadherin expression. The product of the VHL gene has multiple reported functions, the best characterized of which is its role as the recognition component of an ubiquitin E3 ligase complex responsible for mediating oxygen-dependent destruction of hypoxia-inducible factor-alpha (HIF-alpha) subunits. We show that HIF activation is necessary and sufficient to suppress E-cadherin in renal cancer cells. Given the fundamental role of E-cadherin in controlling epithelial behavior, our findings give insight into how VHL inactivation/HIF activation may lead to kidney cancer and also indicate a mechanism by which reduced oxygenation could alter E-cadherin expression in other cancers and influence normal homeostasis in other epithelia.

Defective function of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor ablates proteolytic regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor alpha subunits (HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha), leading to constitutive activation of hypoxia pathways in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we report a comparative analysis of the functions of HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in RCC and non-RCC cells. We demonstrate common patterns of HIF-alpha isoform transcriptional selectivity in VHL-defective RCC that show consistent and striking differences from patterns in other cell types. We also show that HIF-alpha isoforms display unexpected suppressive interactions in RCC cells, with enhanced expression of HIF-2alpha suppressing HIF-1alpha and vice-versa. In VHL-defective RCC cells, we demonstrate that the protumorigenic genes encoding cyclin D1, transforming growth factor alpha, and vascular endothelial growth factor respond specifically to HIF-2alpha and that the proapoptotic gene encoding BNip3 responds positively to HIF-1alpha and negatively to HIF-2alpha, indicating that HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha have contrasting properties in the biology of RCC. In keeping with this, HIF-alpha isoform-specific transcriptional selectivity was matched by differential effects on the growth of RCC as tumor xenografts, with HIF-1alpha retarding and HIF-2alpha enhancing tumor growth. These findings indicate that therapeutic approaches to targeting of the HIF system, at least in this setting, will need to take account of HIF isoform-specific functions.