1. Discovery and Validation of a 15-Gene Prognostic Signature for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
- Author
-
Mehra R, Nallandhighal S, Cotta B, Knuth Z, Su F, Kasputis A, Zhang Y, Wang R, Cao X, Udager AM, Dhanasekaran SM, Cieslik MP, Morgan TM, and Salami SS
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Prognosis, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Transcriptome, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local genetics, Carcinoma, Renal Cell genetics, Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality, Kidney Neoplasms genetics, Kidney Neoplasms pathology, Kidney Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
Purpose: Develop and validate gene expression-based biomarker associated with recurrent disease to facilitate risk stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 110 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for ccRCC ( discovery cohort). Patients who recurred were matched on the basis of grade/stage to patients without recurrence. Capture whole-transcriptome sequencing was performed on RNA isolated from archival tissue using the Illumina platform. We developed a gene-expression signature to predict recurrence-free survival/disease-free survival (DFS) using a 15-fold lasso and elastic-net regularized linear Cox model. We derived the 31-gene cell cycle progression (mxCCP) score using RNA-seq data for each patient. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard testing were used to validate the independent prognostic impact of the gene-expression signature on DFS, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) in two validation data sets (combined n = 761)., Results: After quality control, the discovery cohort comprised 50 patients with recurrence and 41 patients without, with a median follow-up of 26 and 36 months, respectively. We developed a 15-gene (15G) signature, which was independently associated with worse DFS and DSS (DFS: hazard ratio [HR], 11.08 [95% CI, 4.9 to 25.1]; DSS: HR, 9.67 [95% CI, 3.4 to 27.7]) in a multivariable model adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters (including stage, size, grade, and necrosis [SSIGN] score and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram) and mxCCP score. The 15G signature was also independently associated with worse DFS and DSS in both validation data sets (Validation A [n = 382], DFS: HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.6 to 4.3]; DSS: HR, 3 [95% CI, 1.4 to 6.1] and Validation B (n = 379), DFS: HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.2 to 3.6]; OS: HR, 3 [95% CI, 1.6 to 5.7]) adjusting for clinicopathologic variables and mxCCP score., Conclusion: We developed and validated a novel 15G prognostic signature to improve risk stratification of patients with ccRCC. Pending further validation, this signature has the potential to facilitate optimal treatment allocation.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF