Search

Abstract: Patient''s history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiographic evaluation are the cornerstones of postoperative surveillance. It has been shown that localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can recur in nearly all organs of the body, but most commonly in the lung, bone, liver, brain, and renal fossa. Lung metastases can be sensitively detected through radiographic evaluation. Treatment of lung metastases might prolong survival, which supports surveillance x-ray or computed tomography scans. Surgical treatment of early detected liver metastases and local recurrences may also prolong survival, which supports a close abdominal surveillance program. Brain and bone metastases are usually symptomatic when they occur, and their treatment is generally palliative. Hence, surveillance protocols do not usually include their routine radiographic evaluation. Because partial nephrectomy does not increase the risk of local recurrence over radical nephrectomy, we recommend identical surveillance for completely resected tumors regardless of surgical approach. The risk of recurrence after nephrectomy is generally related to tumor stage, tumor grade, and patient performance status. The majority of recurrences occur within the first 5 years after surgery, supporting a more intense surveillance strategy within the first 5 years. The University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) combines TNM stage, Fuhrman grade, and performance status, and categorizes patients into 3 different risk groups. The current surveillance protocol at our institution is based on the UISS. It is expected that molecular markers such as p53 will allow more individualized surveillance strategies in the future. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

OBJECTIVES To compare cancer-specific mortality in patients with unclassified renal cell carcinoma (URCC) vs clear cell RCC (CRCC) after nephrectomy, as URCC is a rare but very aggressive histological subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-five patients with URCC and 4322 with CRCC were identified within 6530 patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy at 18 institutions. Of 85 patients with URCC, 55 were matched with 166 of 4322 for grade, tumour size, and Tumour, Node and Metastasis stages. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to address RCC-specific survival. Subsequently, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to test for differences in RCC-specific survival in unmatched samples. RESULTS Of patients with URCC, 80% had Fuhrman grades III or IV, vs 37.8% for CRCC. Moreover, 36.5% of patients with URCC had pathologically confirmed nodal metastases, vs 8.6% with CRCC. Finally, 54.1% of patients with URCC had distant metastases at the time of nephrectomy, vs 16.8% with CRCC. Despite these differences in the overall analyses, after matching for tumour characteristics, the URCC-specific mortality rate was 1.6 times higher ( P = 0.04) in matched analyses and 1.7 times higher ( P = 0.001) in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that URCC presents with a higher stage and grade, and even after controlling for the stage and grade differences, predisposes patients to 1.6–1.7 times the mortality of CRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on the open surgical management of renal cell carcinoma in the era of minimally invasive kidney surgery. Evidence showing that nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for patients with small tumors is equivalent to total radical nephroctomy in terms of long-term survival; Safety and efficacy of NSS; Clinical factors determining prognosis and survival in the management of the disease.

The foundations of the generally accepted principles underlying the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were best annunciated in 1969 by Robson in his classic description of the radical nephrectomy [J Urol 1969;101;297]. Since then, much has changed in our understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer, advances in renal imaging and clinical staging have led to the increased detection of incidental, lower stage, organ-confined tumors more amendable to expanded surgical options, surgical techniques themselves have evolved, and surgical equipment technology has advanced to make possible new methods of managing renal tumors in situ. Thus, the management of both localized and metastatic RCC has changed dramatically in the last 20 years, predicated on these major advancements in renal imaging, surgical techniques, and the development of effective immunotherapies for advanced disease. In this review, the evolution in thinking regarding the tenets of the radical nephrectomy will be examined, including the necessity for removal of the entire kidney, the possibility of sparing the adrenal gland, when and how extensive a lymphadenectomy should be performed, the development of laparoscopic and percutaneous nephron-sparing surgery using ablative technologies, and the role of nephrectomy and metastasectomy in patients with metastatic RCC. Here, we review current concepts and outcomes on the surgical management of RCC to help elucidate some of these changes, from the evolution of open to laparoscopic to percutaneous, from radical to partial to ablative approaches. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]