Search

Background: To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of adefovir (ADV) plus lamivudine (LMV) in LMV-resistant (R) kidney transplants with chronic hepatitis B, 11 such patients were treated with add-on ADV., Methods: Serum alanine aminotransferase, renal function and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were assessed every 3 months; ADV mutations were searched for by INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay., Results: During 36 months (12-48), nine patients cleared serum HBV DNA with a 3-year cumulative virological response rate of 88%, without the emergence of ADV mutations. ADV dose was reduced in six patients (55%) showing a decline of creatinine clearance, in the absence of proximal tubulopathy., Conclusions: In LMV-R kidney graft recipients, long-term add-on therapy with ADV is efficacious and safe with timely adaptation of ADV dose.

Background: In renal allograft recipients, most cases of liver dysfunction are caused by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The natural history of hepatitis C and B was studied in 286 renal allograft recipients who received a kidney allograft between 1972 and 1989 when tests for anti-HCV became available., Methods: In all patients, hepatitis B (HB) surface (s) antigen (Ag) was tested before and anti-HCV (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay II) after transplantation., Results: At enrollment in 1989 (5.5+/-4 years after transplantation), 209 patients were anti-HCV positive (C+), 42 patients were HBsAg-positive (B+), and 35 patients were both B+ and C+ (C+B+). One hundred four patients were receiving azathioprine (AZA) and 182 were on cyclosporine A (CsA). Since transplantation, the median follow-up was 18 years in AZA-treated and 13 years in CsA-treated patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic hepatitis in 73 patients, cirrhosis in 20 patients, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. In 34 patients, liver biopsy was repeated, and progression of fibrosis was observed in 24 patients. The 12-year patient survival rate was similar in B+, C+, and B+C+ patients (67%, 78%, and 71%, respectively; P=not significant). Liver-related death was the first cause of death in B+ and B+C+ infected patients (58% and 72%, respectively), whereas cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in C+ patients (40%). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (>40 years) (relative risk [RR], 2.8), B+ status (RR, 2.36), and C+ status (RR, 1.65) were independently associated with a worse patient survival., Conclusions: In the long term, B+ patients had a higher risk of death related to liver disease than C+ patients, and co-infection did not worsen patient survival.

Aim: To study the natural history of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplantation, 464 HbsAg negative patients were prospectively studied from 1989., Methods: AntiHCV was tested by ELISA II and HCVRNA by Amplicor HCV RNA tests., Results: Two hundred nine patients were antiHCV positive (C+). HCVRNA was confirmed in 89% of C+ patients. Compared with the 255 anti-HCV negative (C-), C+ had undergone longer periods of dialysis (P = .0001), were more transfused (P = .01), and included more retransplants (P = .002). Immunosuppression was azathioprine (AZA) plus steroids in 133 and cyclosporine (CsA) in 331 patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic active hepatitis in 50, cirrhosis in 8, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. Histologic progression of liver disease was confirmed in 18 of 26 patients. The causes of death in 84 patients (51 C+ vs 33 C-) were cardiovascular disease in 49%, sepsis in 13%, liver failure in 14%, neoplasia in 21%, and hepatocarcinoma in 2%. The 14-year patient survival was 75% in C+ and 86% in C- (P = .002). By multivariate analysis, age (>40) (P = .001) and C+ (P = .019) correlated with a worse patient survival. If patients were stratified according to age (<40 vs > or =40), younger C+ patients had a lower survival probability (P = .03). The 14-year graft survival was 44% in C+ vs 60% in C- patients (P = .001) but pure graft survival was similar (68% in C+ vs 72% in C-) (P = .13)., Conclusion: The presence of C+ significantly reduced both patient and graft survival in the long-term with liver failure being the second most frequent cause of death.

Background: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal-transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in renal-transplant recipients with HBV-related cirrhosis., Methods: Seventeen such patients [median age: 45 years; 7 with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)] received daily oral doses of 75-150 mg lamivudine for a median of 48 (range 11-81) months. All patients had baseline serum levels of HBV DNA of over 6 log10 copies per ml and of alanine transaminase (ALT) of over 1.5 times the upper normal limit (UNL). Clinical lamivudine resistance was defined as a rebound of serum HBV DNA above 5.3 log10 copies per ml and of serum ALT of over 1.5 times the UNL in patients who initially responded with HBV DNA levels of less than 5.3 log10 copies per ml and normal ALT values. Controls were 14 renal-transplant patients (median age 44 years; 3 with HBeAg) with HBV-related cirrhosis, naive to any anti-HBV therapy, followed for 58 months (4-135)., Results: Thirteen (77%) treated patients had a persistent response throughout the study period, including three (18%) who developed genotypic resistance, compared with none of the untreated controls (77% versus 0%, P < 0.0001). Four (23%) developed clinical resistance. Two of three patients with initially decompensated cirrhosis had a durable response and clinical improvement compared with the transient responder, whose liver function worsened following lamivudine resistance. Two responders developed chronic rejection requiring chronic haemodialysis. Overall, one treated patient developed liver-related complications, compared with eight untreated controls (6% versus 57%, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Most renal-transplant patients treated with lamivudine achieved a rapid and durable suppression of HBV, which substantially lowered the risk of liver decompensation and death.

Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the leading cause of organ failure in renal transplant recipients. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of varying immunosuppression in CAN patients on long-term graft survival., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 158 cyclosporin (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven CAN with follow-up of >1 year. Immunosuppression remained unchanged in 75 (NOVAR) and was modified in 83 patients (VAR). In 36.1% of VAR patients, it was increased; in 63.8%, the addition of other immunosuppressants was associated with a 20% reduction in or withdrawal of CsA. A regression model, for creatinine clearance (CrCl) slope analysis after therapy variation, and Cox's analysis were applied., Results: In VAR patients, two-phase regression did not show a correlation between the inflection point in the CrCl slope and treatment variation. Changing immunosuppression gave a borderline advantage in long-term graft survival compared with NOVAR (P = 0.088). In univariate analysis, severe histological lesions, proteinuria >0.5 g/day and CrCl <25 ml/min at biopsy correlated with poor graft outcome (P = 0.0009). In multivariate analysis, only proteinuria and low CrCl remained significative. Stratifying histological lesions in relation to therapy variation showed that severe lesions significantly decreased survival in both VAR and NOVAR groups; however, the highly negative impact of severe lesions in NOVAR patients on graft survival [relative risk (RR) 3.602] was reduced in VAR patients (RR 1.951), with a 10 year graft survival since biopsy of 0.16 vs 0.34 (P = 0.0001)., Conclusions: In transplant patients with CAN, variation of immunosuppression can reduce the negative impact of severe chronic lesions.

Background: It is still unknown whether it is better to administer cyclosporine (CsA) once or twice a day to renal-transplant patients., Methods: Fifty-four patients were randomized to receive CsA once a day (OD group, 28 patients) or twice a day (BD group, 26 patients). Clinical parameters and pharmacokinetic studies were regularly monitored over the first year., Results: Two patients lost their grafts because of renal vascular thrombosis. A patient in the BD group died. The other 51 patients were alive with graft functioning after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Five patients per group had reversible acute rejection. There was a not significant trend toward a lower mean serum creatinine in OD than in BD (1.38 +/- 0.38 and 1.7 +/- 0.80 mg/dL at 1 year posttransplant, respectively). In 47 patients, 319 pharmacokinetic studies were performed. We measured the area under the concentration-time curve during the first 4 hours (AUC0-4) and CsA blood levels at 0, 2, and 4 hours after dosing. C0 was significantly lower in OD than in BD (P=0.0011), whereas C2 (P<0.0001) and C4 (P<0.0001) were significantly higher in OD than in BD. In OD, the AUC was higher than in BD (P<0.0001). OD allows us to reach high levels of C2 and AUC for several hours after dosing, whereas BD showed persistently high levels throughout the whole day., Conclusion: No difference in survival and rejection rates were observed between OD and BD groups.

Liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation (RT). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of liver disease after RT. The impact of HCV infection on patient and graft survival is currently a major concern. Retrospective studies with appropriate follow-up have mainly demonstrated that HCV positive patients have greater mortality compared to HCV negative recipients after RT. Novel investigations by large databases (United States Renal Data Systems (USRDS)) have shown that recipients of donor HCV-positive kidneys are at an independently increased risk of mortality, adjusted hazard ratio 2.12 (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.72-2.87, p<0.001); there was no evidence that any subgroup was less affected. With appropriate informed consent, the use of a renal graft from an HCV positive donor could be offered to an HCV infected recipient. Many renal transplant candidates have satisfactory virological responses to antiviral therapy; the persistence of HCV clearance over a prolonged follow-up after RT has been recently noted. Further prospective studies are needed to define better the course of HCV infection among renal allograft recipients.

Bone disease is a very frequent complication after renal transplantation (RTx). The main features of transplant bone disease include the osteopenic-osteoporotic syndrome, often complicated by fractures, avascular osteonecrosis of bones, bone pain syndrome and growth retardation in the children. The bone loss is greater during the first 12 months after RTx and can reach the osteoporotic range in above 40% of patients, with a fracture rate of 2-3% per year. The story of bone disease over the long pre-uremic and uremic period is one of the main causal factors. After RTx, glucocorticoid therapy seems to play the major causal role. Much more disputed is the role of the other immunosuppressive drugs, of persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism, and age. Hypophosphatemia and some genetic factors could also affect bone loss after RTx. Diabetic patients are particularly prone to develop bone disease after RTx. The main prophylactic interventions consist in the optimal control of hyperparathyroidism during the pre-transplant period, prescribing parathyroidectomy for autonomous hyperparathyroidism, not-responding to medical therapy. After RTx, both bisphosphonate and vitamin D metabolites, variably associated with calcium supplementation, have been demonstrated to have some beneficial effect on bone loss, at least in the first year after RTx. However, there are no data about the possible efficacy of these treatments on fracture rate.

We present the study design of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial aimed at comparing the effects of two different combinations of sirolimus. Renal transplant recipients will be allocated to receive either sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (group A) or sirolimus and cyclosporine (group B). The primary endpoint will be the graft function at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A number of secondary endpoints will also be considered. To obtain a significant difference in the primary endpoint 180 patients will be enrolled.

Background: Bone loss is a frequent and well-known complication in the first months after renal transplantation, but there are no data considering body composition variables (bone, fat, and lean mass) together in transplant recipients. This prospective study investigated total body bone density, fat mass, and lean mass before and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis., Methods: Twenty consecutive renal transplant male patients aged 23-64 years (mean, 40 years; median, 41 years) received one of two immunosuppressive therapies (cyclosporine+methylprednisolone, or cyclosporine+methylprednisolone+azathioprine). The bone, fat, and lean mass of the total body and its related subregions were assessed by means of dual X-ray photon absorptiometry. Mixed factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used for the statistical analysis., Results: During the 6 months after transplantation, there was a reduction in trabecular bone mass in the spine, ribs, and pelvis total body subregions; the reduction was statistically significant in the last two subregions. There was no statistically significant difference in the lean mass of the total body or its subregions over time, but there was a statistically significant increase in the fat mass of the total body and all of its subregions; the increase in total and trunk fat mass seemed to be greater in the patients not receiving azathioprine., Conclusions: Up to 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis, there is a marked increase in fat mass, a significant loss of trabecular bone mass, and no change in cortical bone and lean mass.

Background: Prevalence and pathogenicity of hepatitis G virus infection in long-term renal transplant recipients, are not fully known., Aim: To evaluate long-term impact of HGV infection on liver disease of renal transplanted patients., Patients and Methods: A total of 155 hepatitis B surface antigen negative kidney transplant recipients, followed for a mean of 11 years after renal transplantation, were studied. Of these 48 (31%) patients had persistently elevated serum aminotransferase values. Frozen serum samples were tested for HGV-RNA and HCV-RNA by nested reverse transcribed polymerase chain reaction, and for anti-hepatitis G virus and anti-hepatitis C virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Hepatitis C virus-RNA was typed by a line probe assay and quantified by a branched DNA signal amplification assay, Results: Hepatitis G virus-RNA was detected in 37 (24%) patients and anti-hepatitis G virus in another 26 (17%). Seventy (45%) patients had serum anti-hepatitis C virus and 63 of these (90%) had serum hepatitis C virus-RNA. Hepatitis G virus-RNA positive and negative patients were similar in terms of age, sex, duration of dialysis, rate of transfusion, chronic liver disease, rate of hepatitis C virus infection and immunosuppressive therapy. Fifteen (41%) hepatitis G virus-RNA seropositive patients were hepatitis C virus co-infected. Hepatitis C virus-RNA levels were significantly lower in the 15 hepatitis C virus/hepatitis G virus co-infected patients than in the 48 patients with hepatitis C virus infection only (2.2 vs 10.8 MEq/ml, p = 0.02). Only 3 hepatitis G virus carriers had persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase compared to 29 hepatitis C virus carriers (14% vs 60%, p < 0.001), 10 patients co-infected with both hepatitis G virus and hepatitis C virus, and in 6 patients with neither infection (67% vs 8%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Hepatitis G virus infection is common among kidney transplant patients, it carries a low risk of chronic liver disease even in long-term follow-up. Low levels of hepatitis C virus-RNA found in hepatitis G virus carriers suggest an interaction between these two viruses in immunosuppressed patients.

An abnormal vascular status is present in the transplanted kidney. To define whether vascular factors might influence kidney function of the graft, the renal volume, blood flow and vascular resistance of a group of healthy subjects were compared with those of a group of well functioning renal transplants by color Doppler ultrasonography. Sixty healthy subjects and 75 well functioning cadaver renal transplant recipients were compared by color Doppler ultrasonography. Subsequently, 15 couples of donors and recipients of a living related renal graft were compared to observe the differences between the two organs of the same subject in a different environment. The variables studied were: the diameters and the volume of the kidney, renal blood flow and renal resistance index (RI). The group of cadaver renal transplant patients showed higher mean blood pressure (P = 0.009), higher serum creatinine levels (P = 0.0001) and lower endogenous creatinine clearance (P < 0.0001) than healthy controls. The length (P < 0.00001) and volume (P < 0.001) of the kidneys of cadaver transplanted patients were significantly greater than those of healthy subjects, while the length and volume of the living donors kidneys were identical to those of the recipients. RI, measured on renal vessels, showed lower values in healthy subjects and in kidney donors than in transplanted patients (P < 0.00001). Well functioning transplanted kidneys showed increased renal arterial RI. This non-immunologic factor did not appear to be detrimental with renal function in time, at least until 50 months after successful grafting.

In this paper we assessed the clinical status of 150 cadaveric renal transplant patients who received cyclosporine without interruption for 10 yr. The mean creatinine clearance was 59.2 +/- 15.71 at 1 yr and 55.6 +/- 24.91 mL/min at 10 yr (p = 0.039). Patients were subdivided into four quartiles according to the mean creatinine clearance at 1 yr. The 14 patients with the lowest quartile showed a significant decrease of creatinine clearance from the 1st to 10th year (from 31.5 +/- 5.83 to 24.8 +/- 14.00 mL/min; p = 0.038) while no difference between the mean creatinine clearance at 1 and at 10 yr was found in the other three quartiles. At 10 yr, 84.6% patients needed antihypertensive therapy, a rate similar to that seen at 1 yr (81.4%). The mean plasma cholesterol (253 +/- 57.8 mg/dL) and triglyceride (197 +/- 113.1 mg/dL) at 10 yr were similar to those found at +/- yr (243 +/- 48.2 and 201 +/- 143.0 mg/dL, respectively). Most patients have a high degree of rehabilitation 10 yr after uninterrupted cyclosporine therapy and all patients but 3 were able to work.

The influence of three different immunosuppressive regimens with cyclosporine (CsA) on the development of osteopenia in renal transplant patients was assessed. Fifty-three adults with first kidney transplants participated in a randomized trial to analyze the efficacy of three different immunosuppressive regimens: CsA alone (group 1), CsA plus steroids (group 2), and CsA plus steroids plus azathioprine (group 3). Lumbar spine bone mineral density was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry every 6 months for 18 months. The values for trabecular mass were expressed as bone mineral density and as a fraction of the standard deviation of the mean of the normal value for patient's sex and decade of age (Z-score). Statistical analysis was performed on Z-score and "Z-score change" (value after 6 months minus the basal value at transplantation). At the 18th month, the Z-score increased significantly in treatment group 1 without steroids (P=0.006) and decreased significantly in steroid-treated groups 2 (P<0.001) and 3 (P<0.001). Comparing the two genders, Z-score decreased less in premenopausal women than in men (P=0.018). "Z-score change" did not correlate with steroid dosage, was high in patients with high basal bone mineral density, and was directly associated with the duration of dialysis (P=0.008). In conclusion, premenopausal transplant recipients showed a lower decrease of lumbar bone mineral density than men. In transplant recipients given CsA with steroids, lumbar bone mineral density decreased significantly, while it increased significantly in patients given CsA alone.

In this retrospective historical study, we compared the incidences of malignancies observed among 854 renal transplant recipients (RT) with at least 1 yr of follow-up, with the incidences of neoplasias among patients under regular dialytic treatment (RDT) and a control population from Northern Italy. Cox's proportional hazard model was used in RT recipients in order to evaluate the prognostic factors related to the development of neoplasia. Seventy six out of 854 RT patients (8.9%) developed some malignant neoplasia: 46% of these 76 were cutaneous neoplasias including melanomas, and the remaining 54% non cutaneous cancers: 33% miscellaneous tumors (MT), mostly adenocarcinomas, 17% Kaposi's sarcomas (KS), 4% non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Malignancies had a higher incidence (p < 0.01) among RT recipients than among control and RDT patients. However, MT were equally frequent among the three groups. RDT patients on the contrary, had similar incidence of neoplasias when compared to the control population, but showed a lower incidence of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The risk ratios (RR) for the most frequent neoplasias among RT recipients vs. control population were: 224.7 for KS, 7.4 for NHL, 6.2 for SCC, 5.7 for basal cell carcinomas (BCC), 4.0 for MT. The risk of developing a de novo neoplasia was of about 13% at 10 yr and of 34% at 20 yr. In RT recipients, Cox's proportional analysis showed that age > 40 at transplantation and male sex were the only risk factors associated with an increased incidence of neoplasias, while no difference was observed between conventional (azathioprine+methylprednisolone: Aza+MP) and CsA therapy or in CsA monotherapy vs. double or triple therapy. However, KS occurrence correlated both with CsA dose (RR 15.2 for monotherapy; 12.5 for double therapy; 2.98 for triple therapy) and with 10 or more i.v. methylprednisolone pulses for treatment of rejection (RR 5.2). We conclude that in our series CsA does not increase the risk for development of neoplasias, when compared to conventional immunosuppression.

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of third-generation assays for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), sera from 244 renal transplant patients (113 positive for anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]-2) were studied. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by a reverse-transcripted nested polymerase chain reaction. Antibody to HCV was detected by ELISA-3 in 108 (96%) ELISA-2-positive samples. Five (4%) ELISA-2-positive sera were negative by both ELISA-3 and polymerase chain reaction. In the anti-HCV-negative group, six (5%) additional cases were ELISA-3-positive; three of these were confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay-3 (RIBA-3) and polymerase chain reaction. Recombinant immunoblot assay-3 was used to resolve 82 RIBA-2-indeterminate and three RIBA-2-negative sera. Using RIBA-3, 49 (60%) RIBA-2-indeterminate samples were positive, five (6%) ELISA-3-negative samples were negative, and 28 (34%) were remained indeterminate. Recombinant immunoblot assay-2-negative samples were indeterminate with RIBA-3. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in all RIBA-3-positive and 58% of the RIBA-3-indeterminate samples. Third-generation assays for anti-HCV are more sensitive and specific than second-generation assays in renal transplant patients.

This is the 7-year update of a randomized trial comparing triple (TT) and double (DT) immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. At 7 years, patient survival rate was 85% in DT vs. 87% in TT (P = NS); graft survival rate was 73% in DT and 68% in TT (P = NS); pure graft survival was 86% in DT vs. 77% in TT (P = 0.096). The 7-year graft survival rate was 67% for cadaver graft recipients vs. 92% for living-related graft recipients (P = 0.044). No difference in the slopes of plasma creatinine between the two groups was observed. Ten DT and 13 TT patients changed their original therapy: statistical analysis, however, was carried out according to intention to treat. Both CsA levels and doses were significantly higher in DT than in TT group (P < 0.001) at any time point up to the 7th year. At univariate analysis, a living-related donor kidney (P = 0.044) and immediate recovery of renal function (P < 0.001) were the only two parameters associated with graft survival at 7 years. At multivariate analysis, only early graft function recovery was correlated with late graft survival (RR = 10.480). Thus, even in the longterm, there is no difference between DT and TT, either in patient or in graft survival: at the doses we used, TT had a lower prevalence of late side effects than DT, however, long-term pure graft survival was better, although not significantly, in DT than in TT. The possibility of a safe shift from one regimen to the other one makes the two treatments complementary rather than alternatives.

In 212 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients with stable graft function at 1 year and with potential follow-up of 5 years the prevalence of arterial hypertension was 81.6% at 1 year and 81.2% at 5 years. The logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of hypertension before transplantation (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 3.5), a plasma creatinine level higher than 2 mg/dL at 1 year (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 3.8), and a maintenance therapy with corticosteroids (P = 0.008; odds ratio 3.3) were positively associated with hypertension at 1 year after transplantation. The mean number of graft failures between 1 and 5 years was significantly higher and the mean reciprocal of plasma creatinine was significantly worse at 1 and 5 years in patients with noncontrolled hypertension than in normotensive patients or in patients with hypertension well controlled by drugs. We also investigated the potential protective role of nifedipine. The episodes of acute tubular necrosis (four versus three), of acute rejections (28 versus 29), the mean arterial pressure at 1 year (105 +/- 9 versus 104 +/- 9 mm Hg) and 5 years (105 +/- 10 versus 108 +/- 12 mm Hg), and the mean plasma creatinine level at 1 year (1.4 +/- 0.4 versus 1.6 +/- 0.4 mg/dL) and 5 years (1.8 +/- 1 versus 1.9 +/- 1 mg/dL) were similar in 52 patients who were given nifedipine for at least 4 years and 58 hypertensive patients who never took calcium channel blockers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

278 azathioprine and methylprednisolone (AZA)-treated and 406 ciclosporin (CS) treated patients with a kidney graft functioning for more than 1 year were investigated for the presence of chronic liver disease (CLD), defined as an increase in transaminases of 1.5 times the upper normal limits for a period of at least 12 months. The prevalence of CLD was 36 and 27% in the two groups, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that male sex, alcohol abuse and HBsAg positivity correlated with CLD onset in the AZA group while blood transfusions, length of dialysis treatment, pretransplantation CLD, HBsAg positivity and ferritin levels over 800 ng/ml correlated with CLD onset in CS. The multivariate analysis identified male sex and HBsAg positivity in the AZA group and age over 18 years, high ferritin levels and HBsAg positivity in the CS group as risk factors predictive of CLD onset. Liver failure represented the 4th cause of death in the AZA group but 1 of the 2 most important causes of death in CS in the long term. However, these drawbacks were overcome by the overall low mortality rate in CS. Therefore, renal transplantation should not be refused to patients positive for HBsAg and/or with preexisting liver disease.

In a prospective trial 151 recipients of renal transplants were randomly assigned to treatment with CsA alone (74 patients) and to low dose of AZA, prednisolone, and CsA (77 patients). At two years, graft survival was 84% for the monotherapy and 90% for the triple therapy. This difference was not statistically significant. The number of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the patients on monotherapy. More kidneys were lost because of rejection (6 versus 3), and a higher number of methylprednisolone pulses was used for treating rejection (5.2 +/- 2.3 versus 4.3 +/- 2.9; P = 0.0077). CsA nephrotoxicity episodes were more frequent among patients on monotherapy (23 versus 7; P less than 0.02). Infectious episodes were equally distributed between the two groups. Creatinine clearance was poorer in the monotherapy-treated patients at the third month (42 +/- 16 ml/min versus 48 +/- 15 ml/min; P = 0.02), but no differences were observed between the two groups since the sixth month after transplantation. Many patients on monotherapy required changes in maintenance therapy. In fact, one patient was switched to conventional immunosuppression because of Cremophor-induced anaphylaxis. Another patient who developed Kaposi's sarcoma 4 months after surgery was switched to steroids alone. Excluding 5 patients who lost their grafts a few days after transplantation, only 30 of 74 patients (40%) could be kept without steroids. We conclude that both the therapeutic protocols can give good results in renal allotransplantation; however, monotherapy could create some problems in keeping the balance between drug toxicity and significant immunosuppression. On the contrary, triple therapy is easier to handle, especially in the early posttransplant period when the differential diagnosis between acute rejection and CsA-related nephrotoxicity can be difficult even for a skilled clinician.

To assess the impact of cyclosporine on long-term kidney function in transplant patients, we retrospectively analyzed 273 patients on azathioprine and 308 on CsA with graft functioning at 1 year. To balance the length of follow-ups, the observation of patients was cut at 5 years. Actual graft survival rate at 5 years was similar in Aza and CsA (88% vs. 90%). Multivariate analysis in Aza pts showed that proteinuria (P = 0.006) and hypertension at 1 year (P = 0.002) increased the probability of irreversible graft failure by 2.47 and 2.85, respectively. In CsA patients, proteinuria (P = 0.007) and plasma creatinine higher than 2.5 mg/dl (P = 0.006) increased the probability of graft failure by 5.12 and 6.48, respectively. In both Aza and CsA patients with a follow-up of at least 5 years, plasma creatinine levels were significantly worse at 5 years vs. 1 year (P = 0.004). The slopes of plasma creatinine values plotted vs time were not different between the two groups. Chronic graft dysfunction (CGD) was defined as a stable increase of plasma creatinine of at least 50% above stable values at 1 year. The probability of remaining without CGD at 5 years was 75% for CsA and 80% for Aza patients (P = N.S.). Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the development of CGD showed that hypertension (P = 0.003) and proteinuria at 1 year (P = 0.081) increased the probability of developing CGD by 2.19 and 1.76, respectively, in Aza, while in CsA patients proteinuria only (P = 0.063) increased the probability of developing CGD by 2.29. Graft survival at 5 years after development of CGD was 34% in Aza and 53% in CsA-treated patients. These data confirm that in the long-term CsA does not cause a higher prevalence of CGD and show that, in the presence of CGD, CsA has a superior protective effect than Aza.

In a previous study we demonstrated that cyclosporin-treated renal transplanted patients have a reduced 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesis in comparison with azathioprine-treated transplanted patients. To assess the impact of this defect on intestinal calcium transport we compared the plasma calcium variation and the urinary calcium excretion in 14 cyclosporin-treated and in 12 azathioprine-treated patients, in fasting conditions and 4 hours after an oral calcium load (1 g). In ten cyclosporin patients we also correlated cyclosporin plasma values with plasma 1,25(OH)2D3 values before and after a 25(OH)D3 oral load. After the oral calcium load, plasma and urinary calcium increased significantly in the azathioprine group, while remaining unchanged in the cyclosporin group. A negative correlation between plasma concentrations of cyclosporin and the increment in 1,25(OH)2D3 after 25(OH)D3 oral load was also observed. Thus, our data suggest that cyclosporin impairs 1-alpha hydroxylase activity and alters the response to an oral calcium load.

A controlled trial was carried out in 86 cadaveric and 14 living haploidentical renal transplant recipients to compare the effects of low doses of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (Aza) and steroids with those of higher doses of CsA plus steroids. Patients were followed for 12-26 months after transplantation. The actuarial 2-year patient and graft survival rate was 100% for living-donor transplants. In cadaver renal transplants the 2-year patient survival rate was 100% for patients assigned to the triple regimen and 93% for those allocated to the double regimen. The actuarial 2-year cadaver graft survival rates were 86% and 90.6%, respectively. There were significantly more patients who had severe infections (P less than 0.05), particularly interstitial pneumonia (P less than 0.005), in the double-therapy group. On the other hand, there were more patients who rejected and more patients with severe rejections; more pulses of steroids were also required for patients on the triple regimen, although these differences were not significant. The mean trough blood levels of cyclosporine at the various times were about half as high in patients on triple therapy. There were no differences between the two groups in creatinine clearance at any time. A control renal biopsy, taken from patients with stable renal function after 6-12 months, showed only mild abnormalities. The lesions were semiquantitatively assessed. There was a higher score for interstitial infiltrate in patients on triple therapy (P less than 0.05). On the other hand, the incidence and the mean score of interstitial fibrosis were greater in patients on double therapy, although these differences were not significant. Thus, although similar results were obtained with both regimens, at the doses we used double therapy seems to have more powerful immunosuppressive effects and may prevent rejection, either acute or chronic, better. However, it might expose the patient to a greater risk of infection and of cyclosporine-related nephrotoxicity than triple therapy.