Search

Nutritional assessment is used to implement early nutritional interventions and reduce complications associated with malnutrition, which plays a crucial role in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing pancreas and/or kidney transplantation., Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the nutritional status (NS) in patients eligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKTx)., Methods: We analyzed the database of hospitalized patients from 2020 to 2023 to identify preoperative parameters of NS in patients eligible for KTx and SPKTx. A total of 59 patients participated in the study, all of whom were candidates for KTx-23 or SPKTx-36. The study population consisted of 35 women (W) and 24 men (M), with an overall mean age of 44.8 ± 10.2 years (43.5 ± 10.2 years for W and 46.2 ± 10.9 years for M). Both groups included patients on hemodialysis (n = 34) and peritoneal dialysis (n = 12), and patients in the predialysis period (pre-emptive, n = 13). The examined parameters included Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (PNIO), the nutritional risk index (NRI), proper body mass calculated using the Lorenz formula, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). All patients were assessed according to the NRS 2002 scale., Results: Analysis of the obtained results revealed that the NLR was only one differentiating parameter between Ktx and SPKtx group. Multivariate analysis adjusted for patients' age and gender, comparing quantitative NS indicators was performed. Albumin serum concentration was not dependent on patients' group (KTx/SPKTx) neither age nor gender P = .382. BMI was dependent on patients' age and gender, but not a group (KTx/SPKTx) P = .008. PNIO, NRI, and NRL were not dependent on patients' group (KTx/SPKTx) neither age nor gender., Conclusions: Additional effort should be devoted to the development of a proper nutrition plan for SPKTx a especially in peritoneal dialysis patients. Toward patients on the waiting list, the regular assessment of nutritional status should be performed which is not a rule in dialysis centers. SPKTx candidates in the perioperative period should receive proper nutrition taking into account their caloric and protein needs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Not much is known about the significance of nutritional status and support in transplant surgery, least of all in simultaneous pancreatic and kidney transplantation. Malnutrition in the context of simultaneous pancreatic-kidney transplantation seems to be complex and a still poorly investigated problem. Since SPKTX is highly qualified and also has a small volume procedure, it is difficult to obtain data from large cohorts of patients. The aim of this article is to gather existing evidence and information about the subject, as well as to elicit some questions and goals for the future., Methods: We searched through the Pub-Med database using the keywords "pancreas and kidney transplantation" combined with "nutritional risk", "nutritional status", "malnutrition", "nutritional intervention", and "frailty", finding a total of 4103 matching results. We then narrowed it down to articles written in English with the full text available. We also researched through the references of articles most accurately matching our researched terms., Results: There are numerous tools that have been investigated for the screening of malnutrition, such as the NRI index, PNI index, NLR, SGA scale, and NRS-2002 scale, each of which proved to be of some use in predicting patient outcomes in different surgical settings. Since all of them differed in components and assessed parameters and, in the absence of more sensitive or infallible indicators, the most reasonable approach seems to evaluate them jointly., Conclusion: It is important to underline the necessity of nutritional screening and the subsequent introduction of adequate therapy while awaiting transplantation in an attempt to improve results. Considering the complexity of surgical procedures and the severity of underlying diseases with their intense metabolic components, the patient's nutritional status seems to significantly influence results. Consequently, nutritional risk assessments should be a part of the routine care of patients qualified for transplantation.

Solid graft recipients are at an increased risk of serious complications and death. Out of 130 outpatient recipients of pancreas grafts at our Clinic, 20 patients (15.73%) had a confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (SARS-CoV-2). Each patient had a different course of the disease, and the forms of infection varied from mild to severe and lethal. According to recommendations, after confirmation of the infection, mycophenolate mofetil was withdrawn and the immunosuppression was based on steroids and a calcineurin inhibitor. In this study, we performed an analysis of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients after pancreatic transplantation. Twenty pancreas recipients were confirmed to have COVID-19 infections; 4 of whom required hospitalization owing to severe complications. Patients reported weakness, excessive intensity of fatigue, shortness of breath with exertion, cough, and periodically increased temperature. Weakness and fatigue persisted in these patients for about 6 weeks. In 2 patients there was a need for oxygen supplementation and empirical antibiotic. Mortality was 5%, and there was 1 graftectomy. Deterioration of either kidney or pancreas graft were not observed in any other patients. The course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid graft recipients is similar to that of the rest of the population. Because of immunosuppression, recipients were accustomed to avoiding crowds and complying with obligations to wear masks., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 51-year-old patient with type I diabetes and end-stage renal disease was qualified for a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant. The procedure was performed in a typical manner: arterial anastomosis to the right common iliac artery, the graft's portal vein with inferior vena cava, and side-to-side duodenal intestinal anastomosis. The kidney was implanted retroperitoneally. Six months after the transplant, the patient reported pain in the right lower abdomen, and imaging examinations revealed arterial anastomosis. Reconstruction of the right common iliac artery was performed with a Gore-Tex prosthesis and the pancreatic artery reanastomosed to the right external iliac artery. After the surgery, the function of the transplanted pancreas deteriorated, the level of C-peptide was decreased, and the patient required low doses of insulin. After another 8 months, the imaging studies revealed an aneurysm located in the bifurcation of the aorta up to the anastomosis of the pancreatic graft artery with the iliac artery. The patient was qualified for the implantation of an endovascular of 2 prosthesis, which improved the graft's function. After another 2 months, the presence of an aneurysm at the endovascular prosthesis was found again. The patient was requalified for endovascular prosthesis implantation. Currently, there is no aneurysm but the function of the pancreas graft is impaired, though the kidney graft function is good. Patients after simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant are a group of patients with an increased risk of vascular complications. Treatment should take place in a multidisciplinary center., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kidney transplant recipients are at high risk of severe complications and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: The first part of the article describes a case of COVID-19 in our patient after a recent kidney transplant. The second part of the article presents the outcome of literature search from multiple resources from April 2020 until March 2021. Abstracts were screened, followed by full-text review with data extraction. Part 2 discusses current treatment options of COVID-19, and part 3 refers to this treatment application in patients after solid organ transplant., Results: We have summarized 45 studies from China, France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Mortality rates from published studies were variable. Based on early data from Spain, 42% of patients who developed COVID-19 within 60 days of transplant died. According to results of the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database collaboration group, the 28-day COVID-19-related mortality is 21.3% for kidney transplant recipients, which is still markedly higher than what is observed in other populations. Acute kidney injury was common, and mycophenolate mofetil and mammalian target of rapamycin were discontinued in most patients., Conclusions: Effective therapy has been sought since the outbreak of the pandemic, and at the same time intensive work has been done to produce a vaccine that could effectively protect against the disease. Summing up the efforts of numerous groups of researchers from around the world that have been continued since the beginning of 2020, we may assume the following: (1) we still do not have causal drugs that would reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication and allow its complete elimination, but antispike monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 seem to be very promising, and (2) the withdrawal of antiproliferative and antimetabolic drugs and the continuation of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors is now a commonly accepted approach in patients after organ transplant., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pseudoaneurysm is a rare vascular complication in pancreas transplantation that can lead into life-threatening situations. A 44-year-old male patient after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant was admitted to the hospital for routine tests 3 months after surgery. A computed tomography scan and ultrasound examination were done, and a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm was made. The patient was qualified for endovascular treatment. The pseudoaneurysm was closed using coils, and kidney and pancreas grafts stayed in proper condition. Endovascular interventions in patients after pancreas transplantation are safe and preferable in managing postoperative complications., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The influence of peritoneal dialysis on outcomes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant is still vague. In addition, whether peritoneal dialysis leads to a higher risk of infectious complications and higher mortality rates in these transplant patients has not been unambiguously confirmed. In this study, our aim was to verify whether dialysis type determined outcomes on the pancreas graft and whether dialysis type was a risk factor for graftectomy or recipient death., Materials and Methods: Our study group included 44 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Analyzed parameters included type and duration of dialysis treatment, age, sex, long-term pancreas graft survival and patient survival, overall mortality, and number of graftectomies., Results: Of 44 patients, 3 (7%) required a graftectomy. Mortality rate of the group was 5%. Of 44 patients, 33 had hemodialysis and 11 had peritoneal dialysis. In those who had hemodialysis, the mean duration of renal replacement therapy was 30.5 months, which was significantly longer than duration for those who had peritoneal dialysis (20.4 mo; P < .01). There were 3 graftectomies and 1 death in the hemodialysis group. In the peritoneal dialysis group, there were no graftectomies and 1 death, with no significant differences in the number of graftectomies and mortality rates between the groups. Long-term survival also did not differ between the groups., Conclusions: We found that type of dialysis did not affect outcomes in our group of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Before transplant, each patient requires an individual approach to treatment. The type of dialysis performed should not be viewed as a contradiction for transplant.

BACKGROUND Vascular failures are serious complications in pancreas transplantation. Open surgery is a reliable and quick intervention method, but it carries a risk of infection and bleeding. Endovascular procedures are rare among patients after a SPK, but are becoming more frequently used. One of the main risks of the endovascular approach is that the renal function impairment caused by contrast agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 200 transplanted pancreases at our center over the last 14 years. The analyses included those patients after pancreas transplantation who required the most challenging vascular interventions and ones that were non-standard for the procedure. RESULTS Severe vascular conditions requiring endovascular intervention were observed in 3% of SPKs. In one retransplanted patient, there was an acute ischemia of the lower extremity due to the narrowing of the common iliac artery following a previous transplantectomy, above the new pancreas graft anastomoses. In another patient, local inflammation led to the disruption of the external iliac artery on the level of transplantectomy, caused severe bleeding, and we had to implement a stent-graft to reconstruct the iliac artery wall. A third patient had a pseudoaneurysm demanding further treatment with a stent-graft implemented into the femoral artery due to a pseudoaneurysm of the right external iliac artery. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous interventions in patients with a transplanted or retransplanted pancreas are safe and feasible. It is a technically demanding procedure, but the risk of kidney graft function deterioration, as well as of bleeding due to the high dose of heparin used, is lower than with open vascular surgery.

Unlabelled: The aim of the study was to evaluate complication during and after surgical procedure without connection with transplantation among patients after kidney, kidney and pancreas transplantation with stable function of graft., Material and Methods: 54 patients underwent 62 surgical procedures without connection with transplantation procedure. Main characteristic: standard immunosuppressive treatment, main age 51.1±13.95 years, men 77.4%, hospitalization time 5.27±3.31 day, group 1 - 55 procedures among patients after kidney transplantation, group 2 - 7 procedure among patients after kidney and pancreas transplantation., Results: Procedures from general surgery comprised 60% [cholecystectomy 19 (51%), left hemicolectomy 1 (3%), esophagus removal 1 (3%), hernia repair 8 (22%), nefrectomy 3 (8%), pancreas transplantation in patients with functional renal graft 1 (3%), laparotomy 4 (11%), vascular surgery 27% (correction of arteriovenosus fistula 13 (76%), by-pass surgery 1 (6%), embolectomy 1 (6%), implantation of aortal - iliac stentgraft 1 (6%), surgery of iliac artery 1 (6%)]. There has been no difference between parameters measured before and after procedure: creatinine (p=0.93), GFR (p=0.07), urea (p=0.25), glycaemia (p=0.322), glycated hemoglobin (p=0.3), C-peptide (p=0.3). In both groups were no differences in levels of creatinine (p=0.78) and urea (p=0.23), measured in the next years after surgical procedure. Mortality 0%, lost of graft 0%, in - hospital morbidity 10 (16.2%) (hematoma 1.6%, endocavitary electrode 1.6%, wound healing defect 16.2%). Morbidity in group 1 - 12.7%, group 2 - 48.8%, p=0.04., Conclusions: Surgical procedures performed in a specialist center do not impaire prognosis of patients with stable function of graft, after kidney, kidney and pancreas transplantation.

The main cause of a negative response to grafting is immune rejection connected with a reaction to the donor's antigens. The process of rejecting transplanted organs is a whole-body process. The reaction of the organism begins when the donor's antigens reach the recipient's lymphatic organs via blood or lymph. The donor's genetic material (DNA) is detected in the recipient's blood and lymphoid tissues even a few months after transplant rejection. Microchimerism occurs when in an individual patient the cells and genetic material from both the donor and recipient are present and the cell count of one of these is overrepresented. Such situations can occur after blood transfusions, grafts or pregnancies. It is suggested that this phenomenon could have an influence on tolerance, prolonged graft survival or the rejection process. The results of many experiments are thus far equivocal; therefore further research is needed elucidate the process and mechanisms of graft rejection and its molecular aspects.

Background: Hyperhomocysteinemia occurs in approximately 60-70% of renal transplant recipients and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, mortality and kidney allograft loss. In normal subjects N-acetylcysteine (NAC) given either orally or intravenously markedly reduces plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) level. In cardiac transplant recipients it was reported, that oral treatment with NAC does not affect Hcy levels. We have therefore, investigated the effect of intravenous NAC on plasma tHcy levels in renal transplant recipients., Material/methods: Eleven renal transplant recipients who had normal plasma levels of vitamin B12 and folic acid, were treated with intravenous NAC or placebo in a crossover manner., Results: Intravenous administration of NAC significantly reduced plasma tHcy (p=0.0008). Decrease in tHcy was related to its initial concentration., Conclusions: Intravenous NAC profoundly reduces tHcy level in renal transplant recipients. Further research is needed to establish the effect of orally administered NAC on plasma homocysteine concentration in this clinical condition.

Introduction: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is associated with high risk of infectious complications., Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of bacterial infections within 3 months after SPK transplantation., Patients and Methods: 17 patients with type 1 diabetes at the age of 32-54 years (mean age 42.5 +/- 7.1) were retrospectively analyzed within 3 months after SPK., Results: No septic complications were observed in 2 patients (12%). In the remaining 15 patients (88%), at least 1 (from 1 to 5, a total of 30) infection episode was observed during follow-up. The infections were located: only at the surgical site (1 patient--6.7%), only in the urinary tract (6 patients--40%), both at the surgical site and in the urinary tract (7 patients--46.7%), at the surgical site and in blood (1 patient--6.7%). 2 groups of microbes were predominant, namely enterococci represented by 1 species, E. faecium (13 isolates) and the so-called intestinal bacilli, Enterobacteriaceae (19 isolates). No methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated. Candida species fungi were isolated only 3 times., Conclusions: In our study only 2 types of infections were observed (urinary tract and surgical site infections) and each of them comprised nearly half of all the septic episodes recorded. Gram-negative bacilli were collected more often than Gram-positive cocci, both from the surgical site and urinary tract infections. All infections ended with full recovery.

Background: Transplanted vascularized organs shed passenger cells, normal constituents of whole organs, that migrate to recipient lymphoid tissues and produce microchimerism. These cells lyzed by recipient cytotoxic cells release cellular organelles into the recipient circulation. In addition, warm and cold ischemia as well as immune rejection of the transplanted organ or tissue bring about destructive changes in the graft parenchymatous cells. The knowledge of the fate of donor DNA distributed in passenger cells and in fragments of disrupted nuclei as well as the role of recipient cells internalizing donor DNA could give some insight into the mechanism of graft destruction and immunization or tolerance to donor antigens., Material/methods: In this study we provide evidence that forensic medicine testing of polymorphic genes for phospholipase A2, cytochrome P450 and locus D1S80 may be useful for the detection of donor DNA microchimerism in kidney transplant recipients in sex-matched combinations as well as previous blood transfusion recipients., Results: Donor DNA was detected in recipient whole blood even 2 years after kidney transplantation., Conclusions: The biological significance of our findings is not clear. We speculate that donor DNA fragments in recipient immune cells may play a role in the immunization/tolerance process to allogeneic antigens.

Pancreatic transplantation is a generally accepted treatment modality for patients with type I diabetes mellitus to control metabolism of glucose and prevent complications of diabetes. Graft thrombosis, chronic rejection, surgical complications are the leading cause of pancreatic graft loss among diabetic patients who undergo pancreas transplantation. Pancreas retransplantation is an important option for patients, who lost their primary pancreatic grafts. The 1-year graft survival rates for pancreas retransplantations are comparable to a primary pancreas transplantation. We report a case of pancreas retransplantation in 51-year-old male with a history of type I diabetes mellitus of a 40-year duration, after SKP 20 month before and graft pancreatectomy because of thrombosis 2 weeks after SKP. Pancreatic graft was placed on the right side of the pelvis and enteric drainage was used. Immunosuppressive regimen included daclizumab and thymoglobulin for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus and short-term steroids for the maintenance of treatment. Four reexplorations were performed due to donor duodenum perforation caused by the stricture of the intestine situated in the area of previous anastomosis or/and after the transplant pancreatectomy. Enteroplasty was performed. Three months after surgery the patient remains normoglycemic, insulin-independent with good kidney function.

Aim: Ophthalmic evaluation of patients after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) due to complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus, and type 1 diabetic patients assessed for eligibility for SPK. Material and methods: We performed an ophthalmic evaluation in 37 patients after SPK and 49 patients assessed for eligibility for SPK in the Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior in Warsaw between January 2016 and March 2020. Ophthalmic evaluation included measurements of best corrected visual acuity, anterior and posterior eye segment examinations, fundus digital photography, and OCT. Results: In the patients after SPK, we found a statistically significant correlation between atrophy in the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment junction (IS/OS line) on OCT and the pre-transplant HbA1 level. In the group of patients evaluated before and within one year after SPK, we confirmed activation of retinopathy in 66.7% of examined eyes. OCT performed during the assessment of eligibility for SPK revealed atrophy in the IS/OS line in 47% of examined eyes. Conclusions: Changes in the retina associated with poor pretransplant diabetes control determine the best achievable visual acuity even after long-term normalization of glycemia following SPK. Patients after SPK require frequent comprehensive ophthalmological follow-up examinations during the first year after transplantation because of the risk of diabetic retinopathy progression. Despite the limitations resulting from their baseline status, more than half of all patients after SPK (51%) have a visual acuity of > 0.6 at least in one eye, which is sufficient for independent functioning. Patients eligible for SPK exhibit macular changes on OCT, hypoperfusion on angio-OCT, and 47% atrophy in the IS/OS line. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a new technique, which allows subsurface histological diagnosis at a cellular and subcellular level in vivo and could provide histological diagnosis during endoscopic examination. Up to now histological examination of the tissue sample is the only definitive way of diagnosis and monitoring organ rejection after transplantation. In case of pancreas transplantation percutaneous pancreas biopsy under imaging control is still the method of choice for obtaining tissue samples. However in 73–89% of biopsy attempts, it was shown that the duodenal histology predicts the initial diagnosis of rejection of the pancreas, usefulness of transplanted duodenum biopsies for graft rejection monitoring was also described. The histology technique is time consuming, and the therapeutic decision could not be made quickly, in spite of clinical necessity. In this paper we described feasibility of visualization and biopsy of donor duodenum and detection of microscopic changes in 2 cases of transplanted duodenum, expressed as destruction of the villi and dispersed goblet cells in comparison to a microscopic view of their own healthy duodenum No or only small, endoscopically non-significant macroscopic changes in transplanted duodenum in those patients were observed. In both cases, the histological examination confirmed acute organ rejection. We demonstrated for the first time that CLE is promising and effective method to detect acute phase of organ rejection and also for follow up in those patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• mRNA vaccines are safe and should be recommended to patients after pancreas transplantation. • A steady increase in the number of transplants, as well as an increase in the reporting of potential organ donors, was observed in Poland before the COVID-19 pandemic. • After transplantation, antibodies produced after vaccination disappear faster, so patients awaiting transplantation should be vaccinated. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was a real test of doctors' abilities to adapt and respond to patients' needs. The course of infection varied from influenza-like symptoms to severe infections with multi-organ failure and death. Therefore, the possibility of vaccination against the COVID-19 virus brought great hope. Since 2004, 240 pancreas and pancreas with kidney (simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation, pancreas after kidney, pancreas transplants alone) transplants were performed in our center. Currently, 130 transplant patients are under the care of the transplant clinic. All patients were informed about the possibility of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with the mRNA vaccine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the development of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patients who had previously undergone transplantation. Fifty-three patients were vaccinated with the full double dose and 37 patients received an additional third dose. The level of antibodies in the IgM and IgG classes was assessed in patients' serum. The level of antibodies was assessed before administration of the vaccine and then after administration of the first and second doses. Most patients had no response to vaccination after 1 dose of the vaccine and 21 patients achieved therapeutic antibody levels after the full dose of vaccination. However, the highest titer of immunoglobulins was found in recipients who received the third dose. The use of vaccinations is safe and can protect the group of patients after pancreas transplantation from serious complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection despite the use of immunosuppressive drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]